Digital Television Distributed Transmission System Technologies; Clarification Order, 72723-72724 [05-23660]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
[FR Doc. 05–23717 Filed 12–6–05; 8:45 am]
Summary of the Clarification
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
I. Introduction
1. In the Second DTV Periodic Report
and Order, we approved in principle the
use of distributed transmission system
(DTS) technologies but deferred to a
separate proceeding the development of
rules for DTS operation and the
examination of several policy issues
related to its use. (See Second Periodic
Review of the Commission’s Rules and
Policies Affecting the Conversion to
Digital Television, 69 FR 59500, October
4, 2004, (Second DTV Periodic Report
and Order)). With this Clarification, we
clarify the interim rules established in
the Second DTV Periodic Report and
Order, which will continue to be
available for stations that wish to apply
to use DTS technology during the
pendency of this rulemaking
proceeding. In the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM), which is
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, we examine the issues
related to the use of DTS and propose
rules for future DTS operation. The
rules we propose in the NPRM will
apply with respect to existing
authorized facilities and to use of DTS
after establishment of the new DTV
Table of Allotments, which may afford
stations the opportunity to apply to
maximize their service areas after our
current freeze on the filing of most
applications.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 05–312; FCC 05–192]
Digital Television Distributed
Transmission System Technologies;
Clarification Order
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Clarification.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission clarifies the interim
guidelines relating to DTS that were
established in the Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order. The interim rules
apply to stations that wish to use DTS
during the pendency of this rulemaking
proceeding in this docket.
DATES: Effective October 4, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information on this
proceeding, contact Evan Baranoff,
Evan.Baranoff@fcc.gov of the Media
Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418–
2120.
This is a
summary of the Commission’s
Clarification Order, FCC 05–192,
adopted on November 3, 2005, and
released on November 4, 2005. The full
text of this document is available for
public inspection and copying during
regular business hours in the FCC
Reference Center, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., CY–A257, Washington, DC
20554. These documents will also be
available via ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/
cgb/ecfs/). (Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/
or Adobe Acrobat.) The complete text
may be purchased from the
Commission’s copy contractor, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554. To request this
document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Analysis
This document does not contain
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–13.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:30 Dec 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
II. Background
2. In the Second DTV Periodic NPRM
in MB Docket No. 03–15, we sought
comment on whether we should permit
DTV stations to use DTS technologies.
(See Second Periodic Review of the
Commission’s Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 03–15, 68 FR
7737 February 18, 2003, (Second DTV
Periodic NPRM).). A DTV distributed
transmission system would employ
multiple synchronized transmitters
spread around a station’s service area.
Each transmitter would broadcast the
station’s DTV signal on the same
channel, relying on the performance of
‘‘adaptive equalizer’’ circuitry in DTV
receivers to cancel or combine the
multiple signals plus any reflected
signals to produce a single signal. Such
distributed transmitters could be
considered to be similar to analog TV
booster stations, a secondary, low power
service used to fill in unserved areas in
the parent station’s coverage area, but
DTV technology has the ability to enable
this type of operation in a much more
efficient manner. For analog TV
boosters, in contrast to DTV DTS
operation, significant self-interference
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72723
will occur unless there is substantial
terrain blocking the arrival of multiple
signals into the same area (for example,
interference will occur if one signal
arrives from the primary analog station
directly and a second signal arrives from
a booster station).
3. We received 18 comments in the
Second DTV Periodic Report and Order
relating to the use of DTS, with the
parties generally supporting use of this
technology. We agreed with the
generally supportive comments that
DTS technology offers potential benefits
to the public and noted the encouraging,
though limited, reports of the
technology tested thus far. Accordingly,
in the Second DTV Periodic Report and
Order we approved in principle the use
of DTS technology, set forth interim
guidelines, and committed to undertake
a rulemaking proceeding to adopt rules
for DTS operations. We now initiate that
rulemaking to propose rules for future
DTS operation, seek further comment on
DTS operations and clarify certain
aspects of the interim rules established
in the Second DTV Periodic Report and
Order.
III. Clarification of DTS Interim
Authorization Policy
4. In the Second DTV Periodic Report
and Order, we decided to permit
interim DTS operations if they provided
predicted service only within a station’s
currently authorized area (including its
replication area as well as any
maximization area resulting from
facilities granted by a construction
permit or license). In addition, for an
interim DTS proposal to be approved,
we stated that it needed to be designed
to serve essentially all of its replication
coverage area. We now take this
opportunity to respond to informal
industry inquiries by clarifying how the
interim guidelines apply to DTS during
the pendency of this proceeding.
Specifically, consistent with the
requirement to serve the population that
is currently served, DTS transmitters
must be located within the DTV
station’s predicted noise-limited service
contour (PNLC). We will consider on a
case-by-case basis requests to extend
beyond the PNLC by a minimal
distance, provided such extension is
necessary to permit coverage of the area
within the PNLC. Further, consistent
with this limitation, DTS transmitters
will be limited to power levels such that
any individual DTS transmitter’s PNLC
would only exceed the station’s PNLC
by a minimal amount consistent with
the use of DTS to serve viewers within
the PNLC. For this interim policy, a
station’s PNLC is based on its existing
authorizations (combined coverage areas
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
72724
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
from its DTV allotment, also referred to
as its ‘‘replication’’ service area, plus its
maximization construction permit, if
any, and maximization license, if any).
This policy reflects the decisions made
in the Second DTV Periodic Review
Report and Order to (1) require that DTS
provide service to essentially all of a
station’s replication coverage area; (2)
permit but not require coverage of any
maximization area; and (3) prohibit use
of DTS on a primary basis beyond a
station’s currently authorized area
(including its replication area as well as
any maximization area resulting from
facilities granted by a construction
permit or license).
5. We also clarify the requirement that
the combined DTS noise-limited service
be provided over all of a station’s
replication service area. To evaluate
whether a request to use DTS during
this interim period conforms to this
requirement, we examine whether every
location in a station’s replication service
area is within the PNLC of at least one
proposed DTS transmitter. Because we
do not protect DTS service beyond the
station’s PNLC, DTS signals beyond the
PNLC are considered to have secondary
status and must protect other licensed
operations. Stations designing DTS
operations should also recognize that
DTS service beyond the area that the
station ‘‘certified’’ it intends to serve (on
Form 381 filed in accordance with the
channel election process) may be
considered secondary and unprotected
in the planning for post-transition DTV
service, and therefore may not be
allowed to continue past the end of the
transition unless specifically reauthorized. Consistent with our
determination in the Second DTV
Periodic Report and Order, the
threshold for unacceptable interference
to other stations will be new
interference exceeding 0.1 percent based
on the strongest of the multiple DTS
signals (not based on the combined
effect of the multiple DTS transmitters).
Stations wishing to use DTS, like all
other stations, are required to comply
with § 73.625 of our rules with respect
to service within the station’s
community of license (sometimes
referred to as a predicted signal strength
that is ‘‘noise-limited plus 7 dB’’) (47
CFR 73.625).
6. A station’s desire to explore DTS
operation is not acceptable grounds for
an extension of the replication and
maximization interference protection
deadline. Any station employing an
interim arrangement of DTS transmitters
on its build-out deadline will be
expected to demonstrate that its DTS
operation meets the appropriate buildout requirement. Beyond these
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:30 Dec 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
decisions, our staff will determine on a
case-by-case basis the adequacy of other
aspects of proposed operation
(including permissible power, antenna
height, and the acceptability of
interference showings).
IV. Procedural Matters
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
7. No Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis is legally required in the case
of this Clarification.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Analysis
8. This document does not contain
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–13.
C. Congressional Review Act
9. In order to supplement the
submission of the Second Periodic DTV
Report and Order which was made on
October 8, 2004, the Commission will
send a copy of Clarification in a report
to be sent to Congress and the General
Accountability Office, pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act.
IV. Ordering Clauses
10. It is ordered pursuant to sections
1, 4(i) and (j), 5(c)(1), 7, 301, 302, 303(f)
and (r), 307, 308, 309, 316, 319, and 336,
of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 51, 154(i) and (j),
155(c)(1), 157, 301, 302, 303(f) and (r),
307, 308, 309, 316, 319, and 336, that
the policy regarding interim use of
distributed transmission systems (DTS)
is clarified as described herein. It is
further ordered that, pursuant to 47
U.S.C. 155(c), the Chief, Media Bureau,
is granted delegated authority to review
and process applications to use DTS.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Digital television, Radio.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–23660 Filed 12–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[I.D. 112305D]
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
SUMMARY: NMFS has determined that an
Atlantic bluefin tuna (BFT) quota
transfer from the Atlantic tunas General
category to the Reserve category in the
amount of 200 metric tons (mt), is
warranted. This action is being taken to
account for any potential overharvests
that may occur in the Angling category
during the 2005 fishing year (June 1,
2005 through May 31, 2006) and to
ensure that U.S. BFT harvest is
consistent with recommendations of the
International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT),
pursuant to the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (ATCA), and to meet
the domestic management objectives
under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) and the Fishery
Management Plan for Atlantic Tunas,
Swordfish, and Sharks (HMS FMP).
DATES: The effective date of the BFT
quota transfer is December 2, 2005
through May 31, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brad
McHale, 978–281–9260.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations implemented under the
authority of the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.)
and the Magnuson-Stevens Act, (16
U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) governing the
harvest of BFT by persons and vessels
subject to U.S. jurisdiction are found at
50 CFR part 635. Section 635.27
subdivides the U.S. BFT quota
recommended by ICCAT among the
various domestic fishing categories. The
categories, together with the General
category effort controls, are specified
annually through procedures provided
at § 635.23(a) and § 635.27(a). The 2005
BFT fishing year began on June 1, 2005,
and ends May 31, 2006. The final initial
2005 BFT specifications and General
category effort controls were published
on June 7, 2005 (70 FR 33033).
Quota Transfer
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
PO 00000
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; quota transfer.
Sfmt 4700
To date, preliminary fishing reports
from the 2005 recreational BFT fishery
indicate a season of strong effort and
participation which could potentially
equate to high landings. This is in
contrast with the low landing rates
across the commercial BFT categories.
The Angling category quota allocation of
288.6 mt for the 2005 season addressed
several issues including Angling
category quota overages during the last
several years, consistency with baseline
quota percentages established in the
HMS FMP, and the Agency’s intent to
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 7, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72723-72724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23660]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 05-312; FCC 05-192]
Digital Television Distributed Transmission System Technologies;
Clarification Order
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Clarification.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission clarifies the interim
guidelines relating to DTS that were established in the Second DTV
Periodic Report and Order. The interim rules apply to stations that
wish to use DTS during the pendency of this rulemaking proceeding in
this docket.
DATES: Effective October 4, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information on this
proceeding, contact Evan Baranoff, Evan.Baranoff@fcc.gov of the Media
Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418-2120.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's
Clarification Order, FCC 05-192, adopted on November 3, 2005, and
released on November 4, 2005. The full text of this document is
available for public inspection and copying during regular business
hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission,
445 12th Street, SW., CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. These documents
will also be available via ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/).
(Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or
Adobe Acrobat.) The complete text may be purchased from the
Commission's copy contractor, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402,
Washington, DC 20554. To request this document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send
an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432
(TTY).
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
This document does not contain information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13.
Summary of the Clarification
I. Introduction
1. In the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, we approved in
principle the use of distributed transmission system (DTS) technologies
but deferred to a separate proceeding the development of rules for DTS
operation and the examination of several policy issues related to its
use. (See Second Periodic Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television, 69 FR 59500, October 4,
2004, (Second DTV Periodic Report and Order)). With this Clarification,
we clarify the interim rules established in the Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order, which will continue to be available for stations that
wish to apply to use DTS technology during the pendency of this
rulemaking proceeding. In the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM),
which is published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, we
examine the issues related to the use of DTS and propose rules for
future DTS operation. The rules we propose in the NPRM will apply with
respect to existing authorized facilities and to use of DTS after
establishment of the new DTV Table of Allotments, which may afford
stations the opportunity to apply to maximize their service areas after
our current freeze on the filing of most applications.
II. Background
2. In the Second DTV Periodic NPRM in MB Docket No. 03-15, we
sought comment on whether we should permit DTV stations to use DTS
technologies. (See Second Periodic Review of the Commission's Rules and
Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television, MB Docket No.
03-15, 68 FR 7737 February 18, 2003, (Second DTV Periodic NPRM).). A
DTV distributed transmission system would employ multiple synchronized
transmitters spread around a station's service area. Each transmitter
would broadcast the station's DTV signal on the same channel, relying
on the performance of ``adaptive equalizer'' circuitry in DTV receivers
to cancel or combine the multiple signals plus any reflected signals to
produce a single signal. Such distributed transmitters could be
considered to be similar to analog TV booster stations, a secondary,
low power service used to fill in unserved areas in the parent
station's coverage area, but DTV technology has the ability to enable
this type of operation in a much more efficient manner. For analog TV
boosters, in contrast to DTV DTS operation, significant self-
interference will occur unless there is substantial terrain blocking
the arrival of multiple signals into the same area (for example,
interference will occur if one signal arrives from the primary analog
station directly and a second signal arrives from a booster station).
3. We received 18 comments in the Second DTV Periodic Report and
Order relating to the use of DTS, with the parties generally supporting
use of this technology. We agreed with the generally supportive
comments that DTS technology offers potential benefits to the public
and noted the encouraging, though limited, reports of the technology
tested thus far. Accordingly, in the Second DTV Periodic Report and
Order we approved in principle the use of DTS technology, set forth
interim guidelines, and committed to undertake a rulemaking proceeding
to adopt rules for DTS operations. We now initiate that rulemaking to
propose rules for future DTS operation, seek further comment on DTS
operations and clarify certain aspects of the interim rules established
in the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order.
III. Clarification of DTS Interim Authorization Policy
4. In the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order, we decided to
permit interim DTS operations if they provided predicted service only
within a station's currently authorized area (including its replication
area as well as any maximization area resulting from facilities granted
by a construction permit or license). In addition, for an interim DTS
proposal to be approved, we stated that it needed to be designed to
serve essentially all of its replication coverage area. We now take
this opportunity to respond to informal industry inquiries by
clarifying how the interim guidelines apply to DTS during the pendency
of this proceeding. Specifically, consistent with the requirement to
serve the population that is currently served, DTS transmitters must be
located within the DTV station's predicted noise-limited service
contour (PNLC). We will consider on a case-by-case basis requests to
extend beyond the PNLC by a minimal distance, provided such extension
is necessary to permit coverage of the area within the PNLC. Further,
consistent with this limitation, DTS transmitters will be limited to
power levels such that any individual DTS transmitter's PNLC would only
exceed the station's PNLC by a minimal amount consistent with the use
of DTS to serve viewers within the PNLC. For this interim policy, a
station's PNLC is based on its existing authorizations (combined
coverage areas
[[Page 72724]]
from its DTV allotment, also referred to as its ``replication'' service
area, plus its maximization construction permit, if any, and
maximization license, if any). This policy reflects the decisions made
in the Second DTV Periodic Review Report and Order to (1) require that
DTS provide service to essentially all of a station's replication
coverage area; (2) permit but not require coverage of any maximization
area; and (3) prohibit use of DTS on a primary basis beyond a station's
currently authorized area (including its replication area as well as
any maximization area resulting from facilities granted by a
construction permit or license).
5. We also clarify the requirement that the combined DTS noise-
limited service be provided over all of a station's replication service
area. To evaluate whether a request to use DTS during this interim
period conforms to this requirement, we examine whether every location
in a station's replication service area is within the PNLC of at least
one proposed DTS transmitter. Because we do not protect DTS service
beyond the station's PNLC, DTS signals beyond the PNLC are considered
to have secondary status and must protect other licensed operations.
Stations designing DTS operations should also recognize that DTS
service beyond the area that the station ``certified'' it intends to
serve (on Form 381 filed in accordance with the channel election
process) may be considered secondary and unprotected in the planning
for post-transition DTV service, and therefore may not be allowed to
continue past the end of the transition unless specifically re-
authorized. Consistent with our determination in the Second DTV
Periodic Report and Order, the threshold for unacceptable interference
to other stations will be new interference exceeding 0.1 percent based
on the strongest of the multiple DTS signals (not based on the combined
effect of the multiple DTS transmitters). Stations wishing to use DTS,
like all other stations, are required to comply with Sec. 73.625 of
our rules with respect to service within the station's community of
license (sometimes referred to as a predicted signal strength that is
``noise-limited plus 7 dB'') (47 CFR 73.625).
6. A station's desire to explore DTS operation is not acceptable
grounds for an extension of the replication and maximization
interference protection deadline. Any station employing an interim
arrangement of DTS transmitters on its build-out deadline will be
expected to demonstrate that its DTS operation meets the appropriate
build-out requirement. Beyond these decisions, our staff will determine
on a case-by-case basis the adequacy of other aspects of proposed
operation (including permissible power, antenna height, and the
acceptability of interference showings).
IV. Procedural Matters
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
7. No Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis is legally required in
the case of this Clarification.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
8. This document does not contain information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law
104-13.
C. Congressional Review Act
9. In order to supplement the submission of the Second Periodic DTV
Report and Order which was made on October 8, 2004, the Commission will
send a copy of Clarification in a report to be sent to Congress and the
General Accountability Office, pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act.
IV. Ordering Clauses
10. It is ordered pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 5(c)(1), 7,
301, 302, 303(f) and (r), 307, 308, 309, 316, 319, and 336, of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 51, 154(i) and (j),
155(c)(1), 157, 301, 302, 303(f) and (r), 307, 308, 309, 316, 319, and
336, that the policy regarding interim use of distributed transmission
systems (DTS) is clarified as described herein. It is further ordered
that, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 155(c), the Chief, Media Bureau, is granted
delegated authority to review and process applications to use DTS.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Digital television, Radio.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-23660 Filed 12-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P