Notice Establishing Expedited Schedule, 71819 [E5-6691]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices
need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the
Applicant.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–6694 Filed 11–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Notice Establishing Expedited
Schedule
November 23, 2005.
[Docket No. EL00–95–000; Docket No. EL00–
98–000; Docket No. PA02–2–000; Docket No.
EL03–180–000; Docket No. EL03–154–000;
Docket No. EL02–114–007; Docket No. EL02–
115–008; Docket No. EL02–113–000; and
Docket No. EL04–1–000]
San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Sellers
of Energy and Ancillary Services;
Investigation of Practices of the
California Independent System Operator
and the California Power Exchange;
Fact-Finding Investigation into Possible
Manipulation of Electric and Natural
Gas Prices; Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
and Enron Energy Services, Inc.; Enron
Power Marketing, Inc. and Enron Energy
Services, Inc.; Portland General Electric
Company; Enron Power Marketing, Inc.;
El Paso Electric Company, Enron Power
Marketing, Inc., and Enron Capital and
Trade Resources Corporation; and Enron
Power Marketing, Inc.
Take notice that on November 18,
2005, Enron 1 and the Nevada
1 According to the motion, ‘‘Enron’’ or ‘‘Enron
Parties’’ means the Enron Debtors and the Enron
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:12 Nov 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
Companies 2 (collectively the Parties)
filed a motion asking that the
Commission establish an expedited
schedule for consideration of the
Settlement and Release of Claims filed
on November 16, 2005, in the abovecaptioned dockets (the Settlement). The
Parties state that the Settlement resolves
claims raised in the above-captioned
proceedings arising from Enron’s
actions and transactions in western
energy markets during the period from
January 16 through June 25, 2005,
including Enron’s largest contract
termination payment dispute.
According to the Parties, expedited
filing of comments on the Settlement
will facilitate Commission consideration
of the Settlement, and will also
streamline the captioned proceedings by
removing issues surrounding the
Nevada Companies’ dealings with Enron
from the proceedings without
prejudicing participants. The Parties
have requested that the Commission
establish the following schedule: Initial
comments on the Settlement should be
filed by November 30, 2005, reply
comments should be filed by December
7, 2005, and the Commission’s decision
should be rendered by January 31, 2006.
The Parties also request that the
Commission review the Settlement
without prior certification by an
Administrative Law Judge and an
expedited decision by January 31, 2006,
‘‘to achieve the full benefits of the
Settlement, to eliminate additional
litigation expenses, to effectuate judicial
economy, and to protect the interests of
all Remaining Participants.3 Finally, the
Parties assert that they are authorized to
state that Commission Trial Staff does
not object to the expedited procedures
requested for the comment and review
process.
Upon consideration, the Commission
establishes the following shorted
Non-Debtor Gas Entities. The ‘‘Enron Debtors’’ are
Enron Corp.; Enron Power Marketing, Inc.; (EPMI);
Enron North America Corp. (formerly known as
Enron Capital and Trade Resources Corp.); Enron
Energy Marketing Corp.; Enron Energy Services
Inc.; Enron Energy Services North America, Inc.;
Enron Capital & Trade Resources International
Corp.; Enron Energy Services, LLC; Enron Energy
Services Operations, Inc.; Enron Natural Gas
Marketing Corp.; and ENA Upstream Company,
LLC. The ‘‘Enron Non-Debtor Gas Entities’’ are
Enron Canada Corp.; Enron Compression Services
Company; and Enron MW, L.L.C.
2 For purposes of the motion, the ‘‘Nevada
Companies’’ means Nevada Power Company, Sierra
Pacific Power Company and Sierra Pacific
Resources.
3 According to the Parties, ‘‘Remaining
Participants’’ include the Commission’s Trial Staff,
the City of Santa Clara, d/b/a/ Silicon Valley Power,
the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish
County, Washington, Valley Electric Association,
Inc., and the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71819
comment procedures, as requested by
the Parties: Initial comments on the
Settlement must be filed no later than
November 30, 2005, and reply
comments must be filed no later than
December 7, 2005.
Initial Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern
time on November 30, 2005.
Reply Comments Date: 5 p.m. eastern
time on December 7, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–6691 Filed 11–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP06–22–000]
Texas Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice
of Request Under Blanket
Authorization
November 22, 2005.
Take notice that on November 9,
2005, Texas Gas Transmission, LLC
(Texas Gas), 3800 Frederica Street,
Owensboro, Kentucky 42301, filed in
Docket No. CP06–22–000, an
application pursuant to Sections
157.205, 157.208, and 157.216 of the
Commission’s Regulations under the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) as amended, for
authorization to construct the West
Greenville—Elkton Lateral in
Muhlenberg and Todd Counties,
Kentucky, to decrease the risk of service
interruption during periods of peak
customer demand, under Texas Gas’
blanket certificate issued in Docket No.
CP82–407–000, all as more fully set
forth in the application which is on file
with the Commission and open to
public inspection.
Texas Gas states that it proposes to
construct and operate the West
Greenville—Elkton Lateral, which
would consist of approximately 27.5
miles of natural gas pipeline (12.8 miles
of 12-inch diameter and 14.7 miles of
10-inch diameter pipe) and appurtenant
facilities, to provide an additional
means of transporting natural gas to the
Bowling Green, Kentucky, market area.
Texas Gas also states that the proposed
lateral would decrease the risk of
service interruptions during customer
demand periods. Texas Gas estimates
that it would spend $14,165,000 to
construct the proposed lateral.
Any questions concerning this
application may be directed to counsel
for Texas Gas, Kathy D. Fort, Manager
of Certificates and Tariffs, Texas Gas
Transmission, LLC, P.O. Box 20008,
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 71819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-6691]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Notice Establishing Expedited Schedule
November 23, 2005.
[Docket No. EL00-95-000; Docket No. EL00-98-000; Docket No. PA02-2-000;
Docket No. EL03-180-000; Docket No. EL03-154-000; Docket No. EL02-114-
007; Docket No. EL02-115-008; Docket No. EL02-113-000; and Docket No.
EL04-1-000]
San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary
Services; Investigation of Practices of the California Independent
System Operator and the California Power Exchange; Fact-Finding
Investigation into Possible Manipulation of Electric and Natural Gas
Prices; Enron Power Marketing, Inc. and Enron Energy Services, Inc.;
Enron Power Marketing, Inc. and Enron Energy Services, Inc.; Portland
General Electric Company; Enron Power Marketing, Inc.; El Paso Electric
Company, Enron Power Marketing, Inc., and Enron Capital and Trade
Resources Corporation; and Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
Take notice that on November 18, 2005, Enron \1\ and the Nevada
Companies \2\ (collectively the Parties) filed a motion asking that the
Commission establish an expedited schedule for consideration of the
Settlement and Release of Claims filed on November 16, 2005, in the
above-captioned dockets (the Settlement). The Parties state that the
Settlement resolves claims raised in the above-captioned proceedings
arising from Enron's actions and transactions in western energy markets
during the period from January 16 through June 25, 2005, including
Enron's largest contract termination payment dispute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ According to the motion, ``Enron'' or ``Enron Parties''
means the Enron Debtors and the Enron Non-Debtor Gas Entities. The
``Enron Debtors'' are Enron Corp.; Enron Power Marketing, Inc.;
(EPMI); Enron North America Corp. (formerly known as Enron Capital
and Trade Resources Corp.); Enron Energy Marketing Corp.; Enron
Energy Services Inc.; Enron Energy Services North America, Inc.;
Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp.; Enron Energy
Services, LLC; Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc.; Enron Natural
Gas Marketing Corp.; and ENA Upstream Company, LLC. The ``Enron Non-
Debtor Gas Entities'' are Enron Canada Corp.; Enron Compression
Services Company; and Enron MW, L.L.C.
\2\ For purposes of the motion, the ``Nevada Companies'' means
Nevada Power Company, Sierra Pacific Power Company and Sierra
Pacific Resources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Parties, expedited filing of comments on the
Settlement will facilitate Commission consideration of the Settlement,
and will also streamline the captioned proceedings by removing issues
surrounding the Nevada Companies' dealings with Enron from the
proceedings without prejudicing participants. The Parties have
requested that the Commission establish the following schedule: Initial
comments on the Settlement should be filed by November 30, 2005, reply
comments should be filed by December 7, 2005, and the Commission's
decision should be rendered by January 31, 2006. The Parties also
request that the Commission review the Settlement without prior
certification by an Administrative Law Judge and an expedited decision
by January 31, 2006, ``to achieve the full benefits of the Settlement,
to eliminate additional litigation expenses, to effectuate judicial
economy, and to protect the interests of all Remaining Participants.\3\
Finally, the Parties assert that they are authorized to state that
Commission Trial Staff does not object to the expedited procedures
requested for the comment and review process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ According to the Parties, ``Remaining Participants'' include
the Commission's Trial Staff, the City of Santa Clara, d/b/a/
Silicon Valley Power, the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish
County, Washington, Valley Electric Association, Inc., and the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon consideration, the Commission establishes the following
shorted comment procedures, as requested by the Parties: Initial
comments on the Settlement must be filed no later than November 30,
2005, and reply comments must be filed no later than December 7, 2005.
Initial Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on November 30, 2005.
Reply Comments Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on December 7, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-6691 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P