Design Standards for Highways; Interstate System, 71792-71794 [05-23476]
Download as PDF
71792
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 229
Wednesday, November 30, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 625
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2005–22476]
RIN 2125–AF06
Design Standards for Highways;
Interstate System
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM); request for comments.
SUMMARY: The FHWA is requesting
comments on a proposed amendment to
the design standards that apply to
highway construction and
reconstruction projects on the Interstate
System. A 2005 revision of the
American Association of State Highway
and Transportation Officials’ (AASHTO)
publication entitled A Policy on Design
Standards Interstate System, January
2005, has replaced the previous version
of this policy published in 1991. If
adopted by the FHWA, the new
AASHTO publication would constitute
the FHWA’s policy on geometric design
standards for all construction and
reconstruction projects on the Interstate
System.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver
comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Dockets Management
Facility, Room PL–401, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, or
submit electronically at https://
dmses.dot.gov/submit. Alternatively,
comments may be submitted via the
eRulemaking Portal at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
should include the docket number that
appears in the heading of this
document. All comments received will
be available for examination and
copying at the above address from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays. Those
desiring notification of receipt of
17:39 Nov 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
For
technical information: Mr. Jon
Obenberger, Office of Program
Administration (HIPA–20), (202) 366–
2221. For legal information: Mr. Robert
Black, Office of the Chief Counsel
(HCC–32), (202) 366–1359, Federal
Highway Administration, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590–
0001. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to
4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
comments must include a selfaddressed, stamped postcard or you
may print the acknowledgment page
that appears after submitting comments
electronically. Anyone is able to search
the electronic form on all documents
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
You may submit or retrieve comments
online through the Document
Management System (DMS) at: https://
dmses.dot.gov/submit. The DMS is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. Electronic submission and
retrieval help and guidelines are
available under the help section of the
Web site.
An electronic copy of this document
may also be downloaded from the Office
of the Federal Register’s home page at:
https://www.archives.gov and the
Government Printing Office’s Web page
at: https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara.
Background
The standards, policies, and standard
specifications that have been approved
by the FHWA for application on all
construction and reconstruction projects
on the National Highway System (NHS)
are incorporated by reference in 23 CFR
part 625 (Design Standards for
Highways). For the Interstate System,
the current document specified in
§ 625.4(a)(2) is the 1991 edition of A
Policy on Design Standards—Interstate
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
System 1 (Interstate Standards). The
AASHTO recently revised the Interstate
Standards and issued the January 2005
edition.2 The primary reason for
revising the Interstate Standards was to
reflect the latest design criteria and
perform minor editorial changes to the
previous Interstate Standards. The
FHWA proposes to adopt this latest
edition of the Interstate Standards as its
geometric design standards for all
construction and reconstruction projects
on the Interstate System. See ‘‘Summary
of Changes’’ below for a description of
the changes made in the January 2005
edition.
The Interstate Standards, being only 6
pages, are not intended to be a ‘‘stand
alone’’ document for all of the geometric
design standards that are used in the
development of projects on the
Interstate System. The Interstate
Standards contain criteria that were
developed specifically in keeping with
the importance of the Interstate System
as the backbone of the Nation’s highway
system. Specific examples include:
Design traffic, right-of-way, geometric
design controls and criteria, cross
section elements, interchanges, and
bridges and other structures. Other
publications, such as A Policy on
Geometric Design of Highways and
Streets and the Standard Specifications
for Highway Bridges 3 are referenced in
the Interstate Standards and used for all
geometric design issues not specifically
addressed in the Interstate Standards.
The policies, standards, and standard
specifications FHWA has adopted for all
construction and reconstruction projects
on the National Highway System (NHS)
are incorporated by reference in 23 CFR
part 625. The NHS was established by
the National Highway System
Designation Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104–59,
Nov. 28, 1995, 109 Stat. 568. The NHS
includes the Interstate System and other
principal arterials serving major travel
destinations and transportation needs,
connectors to major transportation
terminals, the Strategic Highway
1 A Policy on Design Standards—Interstate
System, 1991, is available by ordering from
AASHTO at their Web site at https://
www.aashto.org.
2 A Policy on Design Standards Interstate System,
January 2005, is available by ordering from
AASHTO at their Web site at https://
www.aashto.org.
3 A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and
Streets and Standard Specifications for Highway
Bridges are available by ordering from AASHTO at
their Web site at https://www.aashto.org.
E:\FR\FM\30NOP1.SGM
30NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Network and major connectors, and
high priority corridors identified by law.
The AASHTO is an organization
which represents 52 State highway and
transportation agencies (including the
District of Columbia and Puerto Rico).
Its members consist of the duly
constituted heads and other chief
officials of those agencies. The Secretary
of Transportation is an ex officio
member, and U.S. DOT officials
participate in various AASHTO
activities as non-voting representatives.
Among other functions, the AASHTO
develops and issues standards,
specifications, policies, guides and
related materials for use by the States
for highway projects. Many of the
standards, policies, and standard
specifications approved by the FHWA
and incorporated into 23 CFR part 625
were originally developed and issued by
the AASHTO. Revisions to AASHTO
policies, standards, and standard
specifications are independently
reviewed, considered, and where
appropriate adopted by the FHWA for
their application to projects on the NHS.
Summary of Changes
The changes in the Interstate
Standards were developed as the result
of information contributed by AASHTO
and FHWA staff experts. The changes
made to the Interstate Standards
(January 2005 edition) consist of the
following:
1. Metric values have been added for
all dimensions. The previous edition
contained only U.S. Customary values.
2. In ‘‘Design Speed,’’ the sentence
specifying a separate design speed for
rolling terrain has been deleted. The
impacts of construction in level and
rolling terrain are considered
sufficiently close that individual criteria
are no longer considered necessary.
3. In ‘‘Gradients,’’ the table for
maximum grade has been expanded to
include higher design speeds and
intermediate design speeds. All of the
values in the previous edition have been
incorporated in the new table without
any changes. The wording of the table
footnote has been revised.
4. In ‘‘Shoulders,’’ the discussion of
shoulder width in mountainous terrain
has been revised to clarify the values
that may be used.
5. In ‘‘Horizontal Clearance to
Obstructions,’’ the discussion of
horizontal clearance to obstructions has
been revised and updated.
6. In ‘‘Curbs,’’ the discussion of curbs
has been revised and expanded to
clarify the use of curbs in conjunction
with guardrail.
7. In ‘‘Existing Bridges to Remain in
Place,’’ the wording has been revised to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:39 Nov 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
include bridges on future additions to
the Interstate System.
8. In ‘‘Tunnels,’’ the discussion of the
minimum width of a tunnel has been
revised and a discussion of a safety
shape barrier at the tunnel wall in lieu
of a safety walk has been added.
Conclusion
The FHWA proposes to amend the
design standards that apply to highway
construction and reconstruction projects
on the Interstate System by adopting the
2005 edition of AASHTO’s A Policy on
Design Standards Interstate System.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
All comments received on or before
the close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above will be
considered and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above
address. Comments received after the
comment closing date will be filed in
the docket and will be considered to the
extent practicable. In addition to late
comments, the FHWA will also
continue to file relevant information in
the docket as it becomes available after
the comment period closing date, and
interested persons should continue to
examine the docket for new material. A
final rule may be published at any time
after close of the comment period.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The FHWA has determined
preliminarily that this action would not
be a significant regulatory action within
the meaning of Executive Order 12866
or would not be significant within the
meaning of the U.S. Department of
Transportation regulatory policies and
procedures. It is anticipated that the
economic impact of this rulemaking
would be minimal because the basic
design standard criteria remain
essentially the same. The proposed
changes would not adversely affect, in
a material way, any sector of the
economy. In addition, the changes
would not interfere with any action
taken or planned by another agency and
would not materially alter the budgetary
impact of any entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a
full regulatory evaluation is not
required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354, 5 U.S.C.
601–612) the FHWA has evaluated the
effects of this proposed action on small
entities and has determined that the
proposed action would not have a
significant economic impact on a
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
71793
substantial number of small entities. As
stated above the basic design standard
criteria remain essentially the same.
Additionally, the proposed changes
address design standards for States to
follow in constructing or reconstructing
the Interstate System. States are not
included in the definition of small
entity set forth in 5 U.S.C. 601. For these
reasons, the FHWA certifies that this
action would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule would not impose
unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4, March 22, 1995, 109
Stat. 48). This proposed rule will not
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million
or more in any one year (2 U.S.C. 1532).
Further, in compliance with the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, the FHWA will evaluate any
regulatory action that might be proposed
in subsequent stages to assess the effects
on States, local, and tribal governments
and the private sector. Additionally, the
definition of ‘‘Federal Mandate’’ in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
excludes financial assistance of the type
in which State, local, or tribal
governments have authority to adjust
their participation in the program in
accordance with changes made in the
program by the Federal government.
The Federal-aid Highway Program
permits this type of flexibility.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism
Assessment)
This proposed action has been
analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132, and the FHWA
has determined that this proposed
action would not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism assessment.
The FHWA has also determined that
this proposed action would not preempt
any State law or State regulation or
affect the States’ ability to discharge
traditional State governmental
functions.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction.
The regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
E:\FR\FM\30NOP1.SGM
30NOP1
71794
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Proposed Rules
this program. Accordingly, the FHWA
solicits comments on this issue.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et. seq.),
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. The FHWA
has determined that this proposal does
not contain collection of information
requirements for the purposes of the
PRA.
National Environmental Policy Act
The agency has analyzed this
proposed action for the purpose of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321) and has
determined that this proposed action
would not have any effect on the quality
of the environment.
rulemaking addresses obligation of
Federal funds to States for Federal-aid
highway projects and would not impose
any direct compliance requirements on
Indian tribal governments. Therefore, a
tribal summary impact statement is not
required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
We have analyzed this action under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use dated May 18, 2001.
We have determined that it is not a
significant energy action under that
order since it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 and is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore,
a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
Regulation Identification Number
The FHWA has analyzed this
proposed rule under Executive Order
12630, Governmental Actions and
Interface with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights. The FHWA
does not anticipate that this proposed
action would affect a taking of private
property or otherwise have taking
implications under Executive Order
12630.
A regulation identification number
(RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
Information Service Center publishes
the Unified Agenda in April and
October of each year. The RIN contained
in the heading of this document can be
used to cross reference this action with
the Unified Agenda.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 625
This action meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Design standards, Grant programs—
transportation, highways and roads,
Incorporation by reference.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. The FHWA
certifies that this proposed action would
not cause an environmental risk to
health or safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation)
The FHWA has analyzed this action
under Executive Order 13175, dated
November 6, 2000, and believes that the
proposed action would not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes; would not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments; and would
not preempt tribal laws. The proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:39 Nov 29, 2005
Jkt 208001
Issued on: November 21, 2005.
J. Richard Capka,
Acting Federal Highway Administrator.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
FHWA proposes to amend title 23, Code
of Federal Regulations, part 625, as set
forth below:
PART 625—DESIGN STANDARDS FOR
HIGHWAYS
1. The authority citation for part 625
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 109, 315, and 402;
Sec. 1073 of Pub. L. 102–240, 105 Stat. 1914,
2012; 49 CFR 1.48(b) and (n).
2. In § 625.4, revise paragraph (a)(2) to
read as follows:
§ 625.4 Standards, policies, and standard
specifications.
*
*
*
(a) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00003
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
(2) A Policy on Design Standards
Interstate System, AASHTO, January
2005. [See § 625.4(d)(1)]
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–23476 Filed 11–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[R09–OAR–2005–CA–0010; FRL–8002–5]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and Designation
of Areas for Air Quality Planning
Purposes; California; Carbon
Monoxide Maintenance Plan Update for
Ten Planning Areas; Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budgets; Technical
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a State Implementation Plan revision,
submitted by the California Air
Resources Board on November 8, 2004,
that includes the 2004 Revision to the
California State Implementation Plan
for Carbon Monoxide, Updated
Maintenance Plan for Ten Federal
Planning Areas. This revision will
provide a ten-year update to the carbon
monoxide maintenance plan, as well as
replace existing and establish new
carbon monoxide motor vehicle
emissions budgets for the purposes of
determining transportation conformity,
for the following ten areas: Bakersfield
Metropolitan Area, Chico Urbanized
Area, Fresno Urbanized Area, Lake
Tahoe North Shore Area, Lake Tahoe
South Shore Area, Modesto Urbanized
Area, Sacramento Urbanized Area, San
Diego Area, San Francisco-Oakland-San
Jose Area, and Stockton Urbanized Area.
In connection with the motor vehicle
emissions budgets, we are proposing to
deny a request by the California Air
Resources Board for EPA to limit the
duration of our approval of the budgets.
Lastly, EPA is proposing to correct
certain errors made in our 1998 final
rule approving California’s
redesignation request for these ten
planning areas.
DATES: Comments on this proposal must
be received by December 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number R09–OAR–
2005–CA–0010, by one of the following
methods:
1. Agency Web site:
https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. EPA
E:\FR\FM\30NOP1.SGM
30NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 30, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71792-71794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23476]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 71792]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 625
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA-2005-22476]
RIN 2125-AF06
Design Standards for Highways; Interstate System
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA is requesting comments on a proposed amendment to the
design standards that apply to highway construction and reconstruction
projects on the Interstate System. A 2005 revision of the American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO)
publication entitled A Policy on Design Standards Interstate System,
January 2005, has replaced the previous version of this policy
published in 1991. If adopted by the FHWA, the new AASHTO publication
would constitute the FHWA's policy on geometric design standards for
all construction and reconstruction projects on the Interstate System.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Dockets Management Facility, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, or submit electronically at https://
dmses.dot.gov/submit. Alternatively, comments may be submitted via the
eRulemaking Portal at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should
include the docket number that appears in the heading of this document.
All comments received will be available for examination and copying at
the above address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. Those desiring notification of receipt of
comments must include a self-addressed, stamped postcard or you may
print the acknowledgment page that appears after submitting comments
electronically. Anyone is able to search the electronic form on all
documents received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information: Mr. Jon
Obenberger, Office of Program Administration (HIPA-20), (202) 366-2221.
For legal information: Mr. Robert Black, Office of the Chief Counsel
(HCC-32), (202) 366-1359, Federal Highway Administration, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m.
to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
You may submit or retrieve comments online through the Document
Management System (DMS) at: https://dmses.dot.gov/submit. The DMS is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. Electronic submission
and retrieval help and guidelines are available under the help section
of the Web site.
An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded from the
Office of the Federal Register's home page at: https://www.archives.gov
and the Government Printing Office's Web page at: https://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara.
Background
The standards, policies, and standard specifications that have been
approved by the FHWA for application on all construction and
reconstruction projects on the National Highway System (NHS) are
incorporated by reference in 23 CFR part 625 (Design Standards for
Highways). For the Interstate System, the current document specified in
Sec. 625.4(a)(2) is the 1991 edition of A Policy on Design Standards--
Interstate System \1\ (Interstate Standards). The AASHTO recently
revised the Interstate Standards and issued the January 2005
edition.\2\ The primary reason for revising the Interstate Standards
was to reflect the latest design criteria and perform minor editorial
changes to the previous Interstate Standards. The FHWA proposes to
adopt this latest edition of the Interstate Standards as its geometric
design standards for all construction and reconstruction projects on
the Interstate System. See ``Summary of Changes'' below for a
description of the changes made in the January 2005 edition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A Policy on Design Standards--Interstate System, 1991, is
available by ordering from AASHTO at their Web site at https://
www.aashto.org.
\2\ A Policy on Design Standards Interstate System, January
2005, is available by ordering from AASHTO at their Web site at
https://www.aashto.org.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Interstate Standards, being only 6 pages, are not intended to
be a ``stand alone'' document for all of the geometric design standards
that are used in the development of projects on the Interstate System.
The Interstate Standards contain criteria that were developed
specifically in keeping with the importance of the Interstate System as
the backbone of the Nation's highway system. Specific examples include:
Design traffic, right-of-way, geometric design controls and criteria,
cross section elements, interchanges, and bridges and other structures.
Other publications, such as A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways
and Streets and the Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges \3\ are
referenced in the Interstate Standards and used for all geometric
design issues not specifically addressed in the Interstate Standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets and
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges are available by
ordering from AASHTO at their Web site at https://www.aashto.org.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The policies, standards, and standard specifications FHWA has
adopted for all construction and reconstruction projects on the
National Highway System (NHS) are incorporated by reference in 23 CFR
part 625. The NHS was established by the National Highway System
Designation Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-59, Nov. 28, 1995, 109 Stat. 568.
The NHS includes the Interstate System and other principal arterials
serving major travel destinations and transportation needs, connectors
to major transportation terminals, the Strategic Highway
[[Page 71793]]
Network and major connectors, and high priority corridors identified by
law.
The AASHTO is an organization which represents 52 State highway and
transportation agencies (including the District of Columbia and Puerto
Rico). Its members consist of the duly constituted heads and other
chief officials of those agencies. The Secretary of Transportation is
an ex officio member, and U.S. DOT officials participate in various
AASHTO activities as non-voting representatives. Among other functions,
the AASHTO develops and issues standards, specifications, policies,
guides and related materials for use by the States for highway
projects. Many of the standards, policies, and standard specifications
approved by the FHWA and incorporated into 23 CFR part 625 were
originally developed and issued by the AASHTO. Revisions to AASHTO
policies, standards, and standard specifications are independently
reviewed, considered, and where appropriate adopted by the FHWA for
their application to projects on the NHS.
Summary of Changes
The changes in the Interstate Standards were developed as the
result of information contributed by AASHTO and FHWA staff experts. The
changes made to the Interstate Standards (January 2005 edition) consist
of the following:
1. Metric values have been added for all dimensions. The previous
edition contained only U.S. Customary values.
2. In ``Design Speed,'' the sentence specifying a separate design
speed for rolling terrain has been deleted. The impacts of construction
in level and rolling terrain are considered sufficiently close that
individual criteria are no longer considered necessary.
3. In ``Gradients,'' the table for maximum grade has been expanded
to include higher design speeds and intermediate design speeds. All of
the values in the previous edition have been incorporated in the new
table without any changes. The wording of the table footnote has been
revised.
4. In ``Shoulders,'' the discussion of shoulder width in
mountainous terrain has been revised to clarify the values that may be
used.
5. In ``Horizontal Clearance to Obstructions,'' the discussion of
horizontal clearance to obstructions has been revised and updated.
6. In ``Curbs,'' the discussion of curbs has been revised and
expanded to clarify the use of curbs in conjunction with guardrail.
7. In ``Existing Bridges to Remain in Place,'' the wording has been
revised to include bridges on future additions to the Interstate
System.
8. In ``Tunnels,'' the discussion of the minimum width of a tunnel
has been revised and a discussion of a safety shape barrier at the
tunnel wall in lieu of a safety walk has been added.
Conclusion
The FHWA proposes to amend the design standards that apply to
highway construction and reconstruction projects on the Interstate
System by adopting the 2005 edition of AASHTO's A Policy on Design
Standards Interstate System.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
All comments received on or before the close of business on the
comment closing date indicated above will be considered and will be
available for examination in the docket at the above address. Comments
received after the comment closing date will be filed in the docket and
will be considered to the extent practicable. In addition to late
comments, the FHWA will also continue to file relevant information in
the docket as it becomes available after the comment period closing
date, and interested persons should continue to examine the docket for
new material. A final rule may be published at any time after close of
the comment period.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The FHWA has determined preliminarily that this action would not be
a significant regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order
12866 or would not be significant within the meaning of the U.S.
Department of Transportation regulatory policies and procedures. It is
anticipated that the economic impact of this rulemaking would be
minimal because the basic design standard criteria remain essentially
the same. The proposed changes would not adversely affect, in a
material way, any sector of the economy. In addition, the changes would
not interfere with any action taken or planned by another agency and
would not materially alter the budgetary impact of any entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a full regulatory
evaluation is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354,
5 U.S.C. 601-612) the FHWA has evaluated the effects of this proposed
action on small entities and has determined that the proposed action
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. As stated above the basic design standard criteria
remain essentially the same. Additionally, the proposed changes address
design standards for States to follow in constructing or reconstructing
the Interstate System. States are not included in the definition of
small entity set forth in 5 U.S.C. 601. For these reasons, the FHWA
certifies that this action would not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule would not impose unfunded mandates as defined by
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4, March 22,
1995, 109 Stat. 48). This proposed rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year (2
U.S.C. 1532).
Further, in compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, the FHWA will evaluate any regulatory action that might be
proposed in subsequent stages to assess the effects on States, local,
and tribal governments and the private sector. Additionally, the
definition of ``Federal Mandate'' in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
excludes financial assistance of the type in which State, local, or
tribal governments have authority to adjust their participation in the
program in accordance with changes made in the program by the Federal
government. The Federal-aid Highway Program permits this type of
flexibility.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)
This proposed action has been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132, and the
FHWA has determined that this proposed action would not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism
assessment. The FHWA has also determined that this proposed action
would not preempt any State law or State regulation or affect the
States' ability to discharge traditional State governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
[[Page 71794]]
this program. Accordingly, the FHWA solicits comments on this issue.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501,
et. seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they
conduct, sponsor, or require through regulations. The FHWA has
determined that this proposal does not contain collection of
information requirements for the purposes of the PRA.
National Environmental Policy Act
The agency has analyzed this proposed action for the purpose of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321) and has
determined that this proposed action would not have any effect on the
quality of the environment.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
The FHWA has analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order
12630, Governmental Actions and Interface with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights. The FHWA does not anticipate that this
proposed action would affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This action meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. The FHWA
certifies that this proposed action would not cause an environmental
risk to health or safety that might disproportionately affect children.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)
The FHWA has analyzed this action under Executive Order 13175,
dated November 6, 2000, and believes that the proposed action would not
have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes; would not
impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal
governments; and would not preempt tribal laws. The proposed rulemaking
addresses obligation of Federal funds to States for Federal-aid highway
projects and would not impose any direct compliance requirements on
Indian tribal governments. Therefore, a tribal summary impact statement
is not required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
We have analyzed this action under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use dated May 18, 2001. We have determined that it is
not a significant energy action under that order since it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations.
The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda
in April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of
this document can be used to cross reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 625
Design standards, Grant programs--transportation, highways and
roads, Incorporation by reference.
Issued on: November 21, 2005.
J. Richard Capka,
Acting Federal Highway Administrator.
In consideration of the foregoing, the FHWA proposes to amend title
23, Code of Federal Regulations, part 625, as set forth below:
PART 625--DESIGN STANDARDS FOR HIGHWAYS
1. The authority citation for part 625 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 109, 315, and 402; Sec. 1073 of Pub. L.
102-240, 105 Stat. 1914, 2012; 49 CFR 1.48(b) and (n).
2. In Sec. 625.4, revise paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 625.4 Standards, policies, and standard specifications.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(2) A Policy on Design Standards Interstate System, AASHTO, January
2005. [See Sec. 625.4(d)(1)]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-23476 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P