Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, 71176-71177 [05-23298]
Download as PDF
71176
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 226 / Friday, November 25, 2005 / Notices
Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Request from a Federal Credit
Union to Convert to a Community
Charter.
2. NCUA’s Operating Budget for 2006/
2007.
3. NCUA’s Overhead Transfer Rate.
4. NCUA’s Operating Fee Scale for
2006.
5. Interim Final Rule and Request for
Comments: Part 707 of NCUA’s Rules
and Regulations, Truth in Savings.
6. Final Rule: Part 796 of NCUA’s
Rules and Regulations, PostEmployment Restrictions for Certain
NCUA Examiners.
RECESS: 11:15 a.m.
TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Tuesday,
November 29, 2005.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Part 703 of NCUA’s Rules and
Regulations, Pilot Program Request.
Closed pursuant to Exemption (4).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
Telephone: 703–518–6304.
PLACE:
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05–23375 Filed 11–22–05; 3:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–M
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans
to request reinstatement and approval of
this data collection. In accordance with
the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
we are providing opportunity for public
comment on this information collection.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Agency’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information on
respondents, including through the use
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:11 Nov 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written comments should be
received by January 24, 2006 to be
assured of consideration. Comments
received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the information collection and
requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request should be
addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm.
295, Arlington, VA 22230, or by e-mail
to splimpto@nsf.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Plimpton on (703) 292–7556 or
send e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m, eastern time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: 2007 and 2009
Survey of Science and Engineering
Research Facilities.
Expiration Date of Approval: April 31,
2006.
Type of Request: Intent to seek
approval to renew an information
collection for three years.
Proposed Project: The National
Science Foundation Survey of Science
and Engineering Research Facilities is a
Congressionally mandated (Pub. L. 99–
159), biennial survey that has been
conducted since 1986. The survey
collects data on the amount, condition,
and costs of the physical facilities used
to conduct science and engineering
research. It was expected by Congress
that this survey would provide the data
necessary to describe the status and
needs of science and engineering
research facilities and to formulate
appropriate solutions to documented
needs. During the 2003 and 2005 survey
cycles, data were collected from a
population of approximately 465
research-performing colleges and
universities. This survey population
was supplemented with approximately
190 nonprofit biomedical research
institutions receiving research support
from the National Institutes of Health.
Beginning with the FY 2003 cycle, a
new section was added to the survey
requesting information on the
computing and networking capacity at
the surveyed institutions, an
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
increasingly important part of the
infrastructure for science and
engineering research. Other important
changes include updating the
networking and computing section,
based on technological changes and
issues that may occur.
Use of the Information: Analysis of
the Facilities Survey data will provide
updated information on the status of
scientific and engineering research
facilities and capabilities. The
information can be used by Federal
policy makers, planners, and budget
analysts in making policy decisions, as
well as by institutional academic
officials, the scientific/engineering
establishment, and state agencies and
legislatures that fund universities.
Burden on the Public: The Facilities
Survey will be sent by mail to
approximately 465 academic
institutions and 190 nonprofit research
organizations and hospitals. The
completion time per academic
institution is expected to average 41
hours and the completion time per
research organization/hospitals is
expected to average 7 hours. Assuming
a 90% response rate, this would result
in an estimated burden of 17,159 hours
for academic institutions and 1,197
hours for nonprofit research
organizations/hospitals.
Dated: November 21, 2005.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 05–23290 Filed 11–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Availability of Final
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
National Science Foundation.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Final Environmental
Assessment (EA) and Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for the
Construction of Northern Arizona
University’s Merriam-Powell Research
Station at The Arboretum at Flagstaff,
Flagstaff, Arizona.
DATES: November 25, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR COMMENTS:
Electronic copies of the Final EA and
FONSI of the National Science
Foundation (NSF) are available for
review at https://www.nsf.gov/bio/pubs/
reports/ea_mprs.doc. Please direct any
requests for paper copies of the Final EA
and FONSI to Amy V. Whipple,
Merriam-Powell Center for
Environmental Research, PO Box 5640,
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 226 / Friday, November 25, 2005 / Notices
Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff,
AZ 86011 or Amy.Whipple@NAU.EDU.
The NSF Program contact for this
project is Gerald B. Selzer, Director of
the Field Stations and Marine
Laboratories Program, 4201 Wilson
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230 or
gselzer@nsf.gov.
Northern
Arizona University proposes to
construct and operate the MerriamPowell Research Station (MPRS) in
collaboration with an on property leased
from The Arboretum at Flagstaff. This
project is funded by the NSF, which is
the Federal agency responsible for the
environmental review process. The
environmental review process was
conducted in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and other applicable Federal
laws and regulations. The proposed
research station will provide facilities
for visiting researchers, students,
instructors, and agency personnel. It
will leverage productive collaborations
involving NAU researchers and the
numerous field research opportunities
in Northern Arizona, including the
adjacent NAU Centennial Forest. The
two alternative sites considered for the
MPRS were on undeveloped land on the
NAU Centennial Forest and adjacent to
existing development at The Arboretum
at Flagstaff. It is expected that
construction will be completed in July
of 2006.
A Draft Environmental Assessment
(EA) was prepared and made available
for a period of public comment that
ended November 7, 2005. A Final EA
was prepared after NSF considered all
comments received on the Draft EA.
From the information contained in the
Final EA, NSF determined that no
significant environmental impacts
would result from construction of the
Merriam-Powell Research Station on the
preferred site at the Arboretum at
Flagstaff. Therefore, NSF has issued a
Finding of No significant Impact
(FONSI) in conformance with Federal
regulations at 45 Code of Federal
Regulations 640.4(e).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Gerald B. Selzer,
Program Director for Field Stations and
Marine Laboratories, Division of Biological
Infrastructure, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 05–23298 Filed 11–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 1–10606]
Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application
of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. To
Withdraw Its Common Stock, $.01 Par
Value, and the Preferred Share
Purchase Rights From Listing and
Registration on the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc.
November 18, 2005.
On October 27, 2005, Cadence Design
Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(‘‘Issuer’’), filed an application with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 12d2–2(d)
thereunder,2 to withdraw its common
stock, $.01 par value, and the preferred
share purchase rights (collectively
‘‘Securities’’), from listing and
registration on the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’).
The Board of Directors (‘‘Board’’) of
the Issuer unanimously approved a
resolution on October 24, 2005, to
withdraw the Securities from listing and
registration on NYSE and to list the
Securities on the Nasdaq National
Market (‘‘Nasdaq’’). The Issuer stated
that the Board determined that it is in
the best interests of the Issuer to
withdraw the Securities from NYSE and
list the Securities on Nasdaq. In
addition, the Issuer stated that as a
result of the Issuer’s participation in
Nasdaq’s dual-listing program, pursuant
to which the Issuer’s common stock was
listed on both NYSE and Nasdaq, the
Board has determined that Nasdaq is the
preferred marketplace for many of the
Issuer’s institutional investors and that
listing solely on Nasdaq would be costeffective for the Issuer without
adversely affecting the market for the
Issuer’s common stock.
The Issuer stated in its application
that it has complied with NYSE’s rules
governing an issuer’s voluntary
withdrawal of a security from listing
and registration by providing NYSE
with the required documents governing
the removal of securities from listing
and registration on NYSE.
The Issuer’s application relates solely
to the withdrawal of the Security from
listing on NYSE and from registration
under Section 12(b) of the Act,3 and
shall not affect its obligation to be
registered under Section 12(g) of the
Act.4
U.S.C. 78l(d).
CFR 240.12d2–2(d).
3 15 U.S.C. 78l(b).
4 15 U.S.C. 78l(g).
Any interested person may, on or
before December 14, 2005, comment on
the facts bearing upon whether the
application has been made in
accordance with the rules of NYSE, and
what terms, if any, should be imposed
by the Commission for the protection of
investors. All comment letters may be
submitted by either of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/delist.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include the
File Number 1–10606 or;
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
Number 1–10606. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help us process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml).
Comments are also available for public
inspection and copying in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
All comments received will be posted
without change; we do not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
The Commission, based on the
information submitted to it, will issue
an order granting the application after
the date mentioned above, unless the
Commission determines to order a
hearing on the matter.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.5
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–6512 Filed 11–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
1 15
2 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:11 Nov 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
5 17
Sfmt 4703
71177
CFR 200.30–3(a)(1).
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 226 (Friday, November 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71176-71177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23298]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Final Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Construction of Northern Arizona
University's Merriam-Powell Research Station at The Arboretum at
Flagstaff, Flagstaff, Arizona.
DATES: November 25, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Electronic copies of the Final EA
and FONSI of the National Science Foundation (NSF) are available for
review at https://www.nsf.gov/bio/pubs/reports/ea_mprs.doc. Please
direct any requests for paper copies of the Final EA and FONSI to Amy
V. Whipple, Merriam-Powell Center for Environmental Research, PO Box
5640,
[[Page 71177]]
Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 or
Amy.Whipple@NAU.EDU. The NSF Program contact for this project is Gerald
B. Selzer, Director of the Field Stations and Marine Laboratories
Program, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230 or gselzer@nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Northern Arizona University proposes to
construct and operate the Merriam-Powell Research Station (MPRS) in
collaboration with an on property leased from The Arboretum at
Flagstaff. This project is funded by the NSF, which is the Federal
agency responsible for the environmental review process. The
environmental review process was conducted in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable Federal
laws and regulations. The proposed research station will provide
facilities for visiting researchers, students, instructors, and agency
personnel. It will leverage productive collaborations involving NAU
researchers and the numerous field research opportunities in Northern
Arizona, including the adjacent NAU Centennial Forest. The two
alternative sites considered for the MPRS were on undeveloped land on
the NAU Centennial Forest and adjacent to existing development at The
Arboretum at Flagstaff. It is expected that construction will be
completed in July of 2006.
A Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared and made
available for a period of public comment that ended November 7, 2005. A
Final EA was prepared after NSF considered all comments received on the
Draft EA. From the information contained in the Final EA, NSF
determined that no significant environmental impacts would result from
construction of the Merriam-Powell Research Station on the preferred
site at the Arboretum at Flagstaff. Therefore, NSF has issued a Finding
of No significant Impact (FONSI) in conformance with Federal
regulations at 45 Code of Federal Regulations 640.4(e).
Gerald B. Selzer,
Program Director for Field Stations and Marine Laboratories, Division
of Biological Infrastructure, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 05-23298 Filed 11-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M