Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Indiana, 71071-71072 [05-23278]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 226 / Friday, November 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules EPA is then using the PPM model to evaluate the potential impacts of regulatory options described in the proposed rule. To do this, EPA adjusts the life stage-specific rates of impingement and entrainment mortality to reflect the estimated effectiveness of a given regulatory option. EPA then compares the model’s estimates with and without implementation of a given regulatory option to estimate the option’s impact on population abundance. Given the limited number of species populations for which sufficient data is available to implement the PPM model, EPA foresees using the model as a supplement to, rather than as a replacement for, the modeling efforts described in the proposal. Some preliminary results from use of the PPM model are described in Section 4 of DCN 8–5201. EPA has also conducted a peer review of the model.25 EPA solicits comment on the use of the PPM model for the final rule. EPA also solicits submission of data that may be used to implement the model. Dated: November 18, 2005. Benjamin H. Grumbles, Assistant Administrator for Water. [FR Doc. 05–23276 Filed 11–23–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–U ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [R05–OAR–2005–IN–0007; FRL–7999–4] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Indiana Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve Indiana’s April 8, 2005, submittal which revises existing sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission limits for sources in Dearborn County. On April 8, 2005, Indiana submitted its final rule as published in the Indiana Register. Indiana held public hearings on the submittal on May 5, 2004 and October 6, 2004. Indiana is requesting that EPA approve the revisions to Indiana’s SO2 rule for Dearborn County, which removes obsolete rule language and updates information for sources listed in the rule. These revisions will not result in National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC. DCN 8–5201. 25 A.L. Allen (EPA). Memorandum to EPA Docket OW–2004–0002. Materials for Peer Review of the Population Projection Matrix Model. DCN 8–5200. VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:23 Nov 23, 2005 Jkt 205001 an increase in SO2 emissions in Dearborn County because no emission limits were increased. In the final rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal, because EPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If we do not receive any adverse comments in response to these direct final and proposed rules, we do not contemplate taking any further action in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse comments, we will withdraw the direct final rule and will respond to all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 27, 2005. Submit comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID No. R05–OAR–2005– IN–0007 by one of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. Agency Web site: https:// docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA’s electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA’s preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov. Fax: (312) 886–5824. Mail: You may send written comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Hand delivery: Deliver your comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office’s normal hours of operation. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R05–OAR–2005–IN–0007. EPA’s policy is that all comments ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 71071 received will be included in the public docket without change, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and the Federal regulations.gov Web site are ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting comments, go to section I(B) of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the RME index at https://www.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in RME or in hard copy at Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. (Please telephone Charles Hatten at (312) 886–6031 before visiting the Region 5 Office.) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), USEPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031. Hatten.Charles@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information. A. Does This Action Apply to Me? B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA? II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM 25NOP1 71072 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 226 / Friday, November 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the Corresponding Direct Final Rule? I. General Information A. Does This Action Apply to Me? This action only applies to specific SO2 sources located in Dearborn County, Indiana. B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI to EPA through RME, regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD–ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, remember to: a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number). b. Follow directions—The agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number. c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes. d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/ or data that you used. e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced. f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives. g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats. h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? EPA is proposing to approve revisions to Indiana’s SO2 SIP for specified existing stationary sources located in Dearborn County, Indiana. The SIP revisions amend 326 IAC 7–4–13, by VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:23 Nov 23, 2005 Jkt 205001 removing obsolete rule language for the Indiana Michigan Power Tanners Creek Station. The SIP revision also updates information for other companies listed in 326 IAC 7–4–13, including adding source identification numbers. The amendments to this rule are minor, and will not result in an increase in SO2 emissions in Dearborn County because no emission limits were increased. III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the Corresponding Direct Final Rule? For additional information, see the Direct Final Rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. Copies of the request and the EPA’s analysis are available electronically at RME or in hard copy at the above address. (Please telephone Charles Hatten at (312) 886–6031 before visiting the Region 5 Office.) Dated: November 10, 2005. Bharat Mathur, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 05–23278 Filed 11–23–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 11 [EB Docket No. 04–296; FCC 05–191] Review of the Emergency Alert System Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) examines the reach of Emergency Alert System (EAS), as currently constituted, to cover digital communications technologies that are increasingly being used by the American public to receive news and entertainment—digital television and radio, digital cable, and satellite television and radio. The Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is the most recent in a series of proceedings in which the Commission has sought to contribute to an efficient and technologically current public alert and warning system. DATES: Comments are due on or before January 24, 2006, and reply comments are due on or before February 23, 2006. Written comments on the Paperwork Reduction Act proposed information collection requirements must be submitted to the public, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 other interested parties on or before January 24, 2006. ADDRESSES: Send comments and reply comments to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room TW–A325, Washington, DC 20554. You may submit comments, identified by EB Docket No. 04–296, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Federal Communications Commission’s Web site: https:// www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202– 418–0432. For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. You may submit your Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments by electronic mail or U.S. mail. To submit your PRA comments by electronic mail, send comments to: PRA@fcc.gov. To submit your PRA comments by U.S. mail, mark them to the attention of Judith B. Herman and address them to the Federal Communications Commission, Room 1– C804, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Ann Collins, Senior Counsel, Office of Homeland Security, Enforcement Bureau, at (202) 418–1199. For additional information concerning the Paperwork Reduction Act information collection requirements contained in this document, send an e-mail to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Judith B. Herman at (202) 418–0214. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission’s Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) in EB Docket No. 04–296, FCC 05–191, adopted November 3, 2005, and released November 10, 2005. The complete text of this document is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. This document may also be purchased from the Commission’s duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800) 378–3160 or (202) 863–2893, facsimile E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM 25NOP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 226 (Friday, November 25, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71071-71072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[R05-OAR-2005-IN-0007; FRL-7999-4]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve Indiana's April 8, 2005, submittal 
which revises existing sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission limits 
for sources in Dearborn County. On April 8, 2005, Indiana submitted its 
final rule as published in the Indiana Register. Indiana held public 
hearings on the submittal on May 5, 2004 and October 6, 2004. Indiana 
is requesting that EPA approve the revisions to Indiana's 
SO2 rule for Dearborn County, which removes obsolete rule 
language and updates information for sources listed in the rule. These 
revisions will not result in an increase in SO2 emissions in 
Dearborn County because no emission limits were increased.
    In the final rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is 
approving the SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior 
proposal, because EPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and 
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval 
is set forth in the direct final rule. If we do not receive any adverse 
comments in response to these direct final and proposed rules, we do 
not contemplate taking any further action in relation to this proposed 
rule. If EPA receives adverse comments, we will withdraw the direct 
final rule and will respond to all public comments in a subsequent 
final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on 
this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 27, 
2005.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket 
(RME) ID No. R05-OAR-2005-IN-0007 by one of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    Agency Web site: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/.
    RME, EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's 
preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system, select 
``quick search,'' then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification 
number. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
    E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
    Fax: (312) 886-5824.
    Mail: You may send written comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604.
    Hand delivery: Deliver your comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted 
during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional 
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R05-OAR-2005-IN-
0007. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in 
the public docket without change, including any personal information 
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you 
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov, 
or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and the Federal regulations.gov Web 
site are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know 
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body 
of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without 
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be 
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is 
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you 
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name 
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any 
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA 
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid 
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of 
any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting 
comments, go to section I(B) of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 
of this document.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the 
RME index at https://www.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the index, 
some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Publicly 
available docket materials are available either electronically in RME 
or in hard copy at Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and 
Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 
(Please telephone Charles Hatten at (312) 886-6031 before visiting the 
Region 5 Office.)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental 
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
USEPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, 
(312) 886-6031. Hatten.Charles@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information.
    A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
    B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?

[[Page 71072]]

III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the 
Corresponding Direct Final Rule?

I. General Information

A. Does This Action Apply to Me?

    This action only applies to specific SO2 sources located 
in Dearborn County, Indiana.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI to EPA through RME, 
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, 
remember to:
    a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying 
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    b. Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific 
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and 
substitute language for your requested changes.
    d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information 
and/or data that you used.
    e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you 
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be 
reproduced.
    f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and 
suggest alternatives.
    g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of 
profanity or personal threats.
    h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline 
identified.

II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?

    EPA is proposing to approve revisions to Indiana's SO2 
SIP for specified existing stationary sources located in Dearborn 
County, Indiana. The SIP revisions amend 326 IAC 7-4-13, by removing 
obsolete rule language for the Indiana Michigan Power Tanners Creek 
Station. The SIP revision also updates information for other companies 
listed in 326 IAC 7-4-13, including adding source identification 
numbers. The amendments to this rule are minor, and will not result in 
an increase in SO2 emissions in Dearborn County because no 
emission limits were increased.

III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the 
Corresponding Direct Final Rule?

    For additional information, see the Direct Final Rule which is 
located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. Copies of the 
request and the EPA's analysis are available electronically at RME or 
in hard copy at the above address. (Please telephone Charles Hatten at 
(312) 886-6031 before visiting the Region 5 Office.)

    Dated: November 10, 2005.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 05-23278 Filed 11-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.