Safety Zone; Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, Unalaska Island, AK, 70732-70734 [05-23235]

Download as PDF 70732 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. I 2. A new temporary § 165.T07–154 is added to read as follows: BILLING CODE 4910–15–P § 165.T07–154 Security Zone; St. John’s River, Jacksonville, FL to Ribault Bay. (a) Regulated area. The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary moving security zone for a foreign navy submarine within the area 12 nautical miles seaward from the baseline at the mouth of the St. John’s River to Ribault Bay. The temporary security zone encompasses all waters within 500 yards in any direction around a foreign navy submarine transiting within the area between 12 nautical miles seaward of the sea buoy at the entrance to the St. John’s River to Ribault Bay. (b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section: Designated representatives means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State, and local officers designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP), Jacksonville, Florida, in the enforcement of the regulated navigation areas and security zones. Minimum Safe Speed means the speed at which a vessel proceeds when it is fully off plane, completely settled in the water and not creating excessive wake. Due to the different speeds at which vessels of different sizes and configurations may travel while in compliance with this definition, no specific speed is assigned to minimum safe speed. In no instance should minimum safe speed be interpreted as a speed less than that required for a particular vessel to maintain steerageway. A vessel is not proceeding at minimum safe speed if it is: (1) On a plane; (2) In the process of coming up onto or coming off a plane; or (3) Creating an excessive wake. (c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.33 of this part, anchoring, mooring or transiting in this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Jacksonville, FL or his designated representative. Persons or vessels that receive permission to enter the security zone must proceed at a minimum safe speed, must comply with all orders issued by the COTP or his designated representative, and must not proceed any closer than 100 yards, in any direction, to the submarine. (d) Dates. This section is effective from 8 a.m. on November 9, 2005, until 11:59 p.m. on December 1, 2005. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:18 Nov 22, 2005 Jkt 208001 Dated: November 9, 2005. David L. Lersch, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Jacksonville. [FR Doc. 05–23236 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [COTP Western Alaska–04–003] RIN 1625–AA00 Safety Zone; Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, Unalaska Island, AK Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule; change of effective period. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is extending the effective period of the safety zone in the Bering Sea, Unalaska Island, Alaska. The zone is needed to facilitate safe salvage operations related to the grounding of the merchant vessel (M/V) SELENDANG AYU. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District, the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Western Alaska, or their on-scene representative. The intended effect of the proposed safety zone is to mitigate safety risks to salvage personnel. DATES: The effective period of § 165.T17–010 is extended from November 30, 2005 through October 31, 2006. ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket are available for inspection and copying at Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Anchorage, 510 ‘‘L’’ Street, Suite 100, Anchorage, AK 99501. Normal Office hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Meredith Gillman, Marine Safety Office Anchorage, at (907) 271–6700. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Regulatory Information We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM and for making this regulation effective less than 30 days after its publication in the Federal Register. Any delay encountered in this regulation’s effective date would be contrary to PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 public interest because immediate action is needed to prevent unauthorized vessel traffic from hindering salvage operations. The Coast Guard will terminate the zone when salvage operations are complete and the area adjacent to the grounded vessel is considered safe to vessel traffic. Background and Purpose The M/V SELENDANG AYU ran aground at a position of 53.634° N, 167.125° W on December 9, 2004. The vessel then broke in half and discharged its fuel oil into the water. A marine salvor is removing sections of the wreck from the bow and stern sections of the grounded vessel, as well as from the adjacent shoreline. The safety zone is necessary to prevent unauthorized vessels from impeding salvage operations. Discussion of Rule The Unified Command, which is responding to the grounding of the M/ V Selendang Ayu, identified the safety zone in the area where subsequent salvage operations will be taking place. This area is defined by a circle centered at 53 degrees, 38 minutes North; 167 degrees, 7 minutes, 20 seconds West with a radius of 750 yards. All coordinates reference Datum: NAD 1983. Regulatory Evaluation This rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential cost and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM 23NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in the area defined by a circle centered at 53 degrees, 38 minutes North; 167 degrees, 7 minutes, 20 seconds West with a radius of 750 yards. This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Vessel traffic transiting from the north to south side of Unalaska Island can pass safely around the safety zone. We will terminate the safety zone once salvage operations are complete and the area adjacent to the grounded vessel is considered safe for vessel traffic. The safety zone is not located in a navigable channel. Collection of Information This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520). Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. Taking of Private Property This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:18 Nov 22, 2005 Jkt 208001 Civil Justice Reform This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. Protection of Children We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Energy Effects We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under that order because it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 70733 This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f). A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical Exclusion Determination’’ will be available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. I For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 2. From November 30, 2005 to October 31, 2006, amend temporary § 165.T17–010 to read as follows: I § 165.T17–010 Safety Zone; Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, Unalaska Island, AK. (a) Description. This safety zone is defined by a circle centered at 53 degrees, 38 minutes North; 167 degrees, 7 minutes, 20 seconds West with a radius of 750 yards. All coordinates reference Datum: NAD 1983. (b) Enforcement period. The safety zone in this section will be enforced from November 30, 2005 through October 31, 2006. (c) Regulations. (1) The Captain of the Port and the Duty Officer at Marine Safety Office, Anchorage, Alaska can be contacted at telephone number (907) 271–6700. (2) The Captain of the Port may authorize and designate any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer to act on his behalf in enforcing the safety zone. (3) The general regulations governing safety zones contained in § 165.23 apply. No person or vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone, with the exception of attending vessels, without first obtaining permission from the Captain of the Port or his on-scene representative. E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM 23NOR1 70734 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations Dated: November 10, 2005. M.R. DeVries, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Western Alaska. [FR Doc. 05–23235 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD 36 CFR Parts 1190 and 1191 [Docket No. 02–1] RIN 3014–AA26 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities; Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Accessibility Guidelines; Public Rights-of-Way Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. ACTION: Notice of availability of draft guidelines. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board) has placed in the docket and on its Web site for public review draft guidelines which address accessibility in the public right-of-way. The draft guidelines are under consideration by the Board. The purpose of placing the draft guidelines in the docket is to facilitate gathering of additional information for the regulatory assessment and the preparation of technical assistance materials to accompany a future rule. The Board is not seeking comments on the draft guidelines. The Board will issue a notice of proposed rulemaking at a future date and will solicit comments at that time, prior to issuing a final rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Windley, Office of Technical and Information Services, Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, 1331 F Street, NW., suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004–1111. Telephone number (202) 272–0025 (voice); (202) 272–0082 (TTY). Electronic mail address: windley@access-board.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1999, the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board) established the Public Rights-ofWay Access Advisory Committee (Committee) to make recommendations on accessibility guidelines for newly constructed and altered public rights-ofway covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968. The VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:18 Nov 22, 2005 Jkt 208001 Committee was comprised of representatives from disability organizations, public works departments, transportation and traffic engineering groups, design professionals and civil engineers, pedestrian and bicycle organizations, Federal agencies, and standard-setting bodies. The Committee met on five occasions between December 1999 and January 2001. On January 10, 2001, the Committee presented its recommendations on accessible public rights-of-way in a report entitled ‘‘Building a True Community.’’ The Committee’s report provided recommendations on access to sidewalks, street crossings, and other related pedestrian facilities and addressed various issues and design constraints specific to public rights-ofway. The report is available on the Access Board’s Web site at https:// www.access-board.gov/prowac/ commrept/index.htm or can be ordered by calling the Access Board at (202) 272–0080. Persons using a TTY should call (202) 272–0082. The report is available in alternate formats upon request. Persons who want a copy in an alternate format should specify the type of format (cassette tape, braille, large print, or ASCII disk). The Access Board convened an ad hoc committee of Board members to review the Committee’s recommendations. After reviewing the report in detail, the Board’s ad hoc committee prepared recommendations for guidelines addressing accessibility in the public right-of-way. On June 17, 2002, the Board made the recommendations of the ad hoc committee available for public comment and review by notice in the Federal Register (67 FR 41206). Over 1,400 comments were received from the public in response to the publication of the draft. Of this total, almost 900 comments were from persons with disabilities and groups representing them; the great preponderance of comments in this category came from people who indicated that they were blind or had low vision. Respondents from the transportation industry, including design engineers and consultants, submitted slightly over 200 comments. Another 100 were received from State and local government administrative agencies. Comments are posted on the Board’s Web site at https://www.accessboard.gov/prowac/comments/ index.htm. Further discussion of the comments received is available in the supplementary information accompanying the draft guidelines. The members of the Board’s ad hoc committee subsequently reviewed and PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 considered the comments received in response to the 2002 Federal Register notice. The draft guidelines made available today on the Board’s Web site are the result of those deliberations. The Access Board is making the draft guidelines available in order to facilitate the gathering of additional information for a regulatory assessment prior to publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking and to assist in the development of technical assistance materials. The Board is not soliciting comments on the draft guidelines. The Board will solicit comments when a proposed rule is issued in conjunction with the regulatory assessment. The draft guidelines along with supplementary information have been placed in the rulemaking docket (Docket No. 02–1) for public review. The draft guidelines and supplementary information are also available on the Access Board’s Web site at https:// www.access-board.gov/prowac/ draft.htm. You may also obtain a copy of the draft guidelines and supplementary information by contacting the Access Board at (202) 272–0080. Persons using a TTY should call (202) 272–0082. The documents are available in alternate formats upon request. Persons who want a copy in an alternate format should specify the type of format (cassette tape, braille, large print, or ASCII disk). Lawrence W. Roffee, Executive Director. [FR Doc. 05–23161 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8150–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [R09–OAR–2005–CA–0006; FRL–7998–4] Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Imperial and Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control Districts Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) and Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), we are approving local rules that are E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM 23NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70732-70734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23235]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[COTP Western Alaska-04-003]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, Unalaska Island, AK

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule; change of effective period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is extending the effective period of the 
safety zone in the Bering Sea, Unalaska Island, Alaska. The zone is 
needed to facilitate safe salvage operations related to the grounding 
of the merchant vessel (M/V) SELENDANG AYU. Entry of vessels or persons 
into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the 
Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District, the Coast Guard Captain of 
the Port, Western Alaska, or their on-scene representative. The 
intended effect of the proposed safety zone is to mitigate safety risks 
to salvage personnel.

DATES: The effective period of Sec.  165.T17-010 is extended from 
November 30, 2005 through October 31, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are available for inspection and copying at Coast Guard 
Marine Safety Office Anchorage, 510 ``L'' Street, Suite 100, Anchorage, 
AK 99501. Normal Office hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Meredith Gillman, Marine Safety 
Office Anchorage, at (907) 271-6700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM and for making this regulation 
effective less than 30 days after its publication in the Federal 
Register. Any delay encountered in this regulation's effective date 
would be contrary to public interest because immediate action is needed 
to prevent unauthorized vessel traffic from hindering salvage 
operations.
    The Coast Guard will terminate the zone when salvage operations are 
complete and the area adjacent to the grounded vessel is considered 
safe to vessel traffic.

Background and Purpose

    The M/V SELENDANG AYU ran aground at a position of 53.634[deg] N, 
167.125[deg] W on December 9, 2004. The vessel then broke in half and 
discharged its fuel oil into the water. A marine salvor is removing 
sections of the wreck from the bow and stern sections of the grounded 
vessel, as well as from the adjacent shoreline. The safety zone is 
necessary to prevent unauthorized vessels from impeding salvage 
operations.

Discussion of Rule

    The Unified Command, which is responding to the grounding of the M/
V Selendang Ayu, identified the safety zone in the area where 
subsequent salvage operations will be taking place. This area is 
defined by a circle centered at 53 degrees, 38 minutes North; 167 
degrees, 7 minutes, 20 seconds West with a radius of 750 yards. All 
coordinates reference Datum: NAD 1983.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does 
not require an assessment of potential cost and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. It is not significant under the 
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS). The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this 
rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 
10(e) of the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.

[[Page 70733]]

    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be 
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit 
or anchor in the area defined by a circle centered at 53 degrees, 38 
minutes North; 167 degrees, 7 minutes, 20 seconds West with a radius of 
750 yards.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Vessel 
traffic transiting from the north to south side of Unalaska Island can 
pass safely around the safety zone. We will terminate the safety zone 
once salvage operations are complete and the area adjacent to the 
grounded vessel is considered safe for vessel traffic. The safety zone 
is not located in a navigable channel.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we 
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). A final 
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final ``Categorical 
Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR 
part 165 as follows:

PART 165--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. 
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. From November 30, 2005 to October 31, 2006, amend temporary Sec.  
165.T17-010 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T17-010  Safety Zone; Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, Unalaska 
Island, AK.

    (a) Description. This safety zone is defined by a circle centered 
at 53 degrees, 38 minutes North; 167 degrees, 7 minutes, 20 seconds 
West with a radius of 750 yards. All coordinates reference Datum: NAD 
1983.
    (b) Enforcement period. The safety zone in this section will be 
enforced from November 30, 2005 through October 31, 2006.
    (c) Regulations. (1) The Captain of the Port and the Duty Officer 
at Marine Safety Office, Anchorage, Alaska can be contacted at 
telephone number (907) 271-6700.
    (2) The Captain of the Port may authorize and designate any Coast 
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer to act on his behalf in 
enforcing the safety zone.
    (3) The general regulations governing safety zones contained in 
Sec.  165.23 apply. No person or vessel may enter or remain in this 
safety zone, with the exception of attending vessels, without first 
obtaining permission from the Captain of the Port or his on-scene 
representative.


[[Page 70734]]


    Dated: November 10, 2005.
M.R. DeVries,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Western Alaska.
[FR Doc. 05-23235 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.