Safety Zone; Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, Unalaska Island, AK, 70732-70734 [05-23235]
Download as PDF
70732
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
I 2. A new temporary § 165.T07–154 is
added to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
§ 165.T07–154 Security Zone; St. John’s
River, Jacksonville, FL to Ribault Bay.
(a) Regulated area. The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary moving
security zone for a foreign navy
submarine within the area 12 nautical
miles seaward from the baseline at the
mouth of the St. John’s River to Ribault
Bay. The temporary security zone
encompasses all waters within 500
yards in any direction around a foreign
navy submarine transiting within the
area between 12 nautical miles seaward
of the sea buoy at the entrance to the St.
John’s River to Ribault Bay.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
Designated representatives means
Coast Guard Patrol Commanders
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers and other officers operating
Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State,
and local officers designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP),
Jacksonville, Florida, in the enforcement
of the regulated navigation areas and
security zones.
Minimum Safe Speed means the
speed at which a vessel proceeds when
it is fully off plane, completely settled
in the water and not creating excessive
wake. Due to the different speeds at
which vessels of different sizes and
configurations may travel while in
compliance with this definition, no
specific speed is assigned to minimum
safe speed. In no instance should
minimum safe speed be interpreted as a
speed less than that required for a
particular vessel to maintain
steerageway. A vessel is not proceeding
at minimum safe speed if it is:
(1) On a plane;
(2) In the process of coming up onto
or coming off a plane; or
(3) Creating an excessive wake.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.33 of
this part, anchoring, mooring or
transiting in this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port Jacksonville, FL or
his designated representative. Persons
or vessels that receive permission to
enter the security zone must proceed at
a minimum safe speed, must comply
with all orders issued by the COTP or
his designated representative, and must
not proceed any closer than 100 yards,
in any direction, to the submarine.
(d) Dates. This section is effective
from 8 a.m. on November 9, 2005, until
11:59 p.m. on December 1, 2005.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Nov 22, 2005
Jkt 208001
Dated: November 9, 2005.
David L. Lersch,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 05–23236 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP Western Alaska–04–003]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Bering Sea, Aleutian
Islands, Unalaska Island, AK
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule; change of
effective period.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is extending
the effective period of the safety zone in
the Bering Sea, Unalaska Island, Alaska.
The zone is needed to facilitate safe
salvage operations related to the
grounding of the merchant vessel (M/V)
SELENDANG AYU. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District, the Coast Guard Captain of the
Port, Western Alaska, or their on-scene
representative. The intended effect of
the proposed safety zone is to mitigate
safety risks to salvage personnel.
DATES: The effective period of
§ 165.T17–010 is extended from
November 30, 2005 through October 31,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are available for inspection and
copying at Coast Guard Marine Safety
Office Anchorage, 510 ‘‘L’’ Street, Suite
100, Anchorage, AK 99501. Normal
Office hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT
Meredith Gillman, Marine Safety Office
Anchorage, at (907) 271–6700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM and for
making this regulation effective less
than 30 days after its publication in the
Federal Register. Any delay
encountered in this regulation’s
effective date would be contrary to
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
public interest because immediate
action is needed to prevent
unauthorized vessel traffic from
hindering salvage operations.
The Coast Guard will terminate the
zone when salvage operations are
complete and the area adjacent to the
grounded vessel is considered safe to
vessel traffic.
Background and Purpose
The M/V SELENDANG AYU ran
aground at a position of 53.634° N,
167.125° W on December 9, 2004. The
vessel then broke in half and discharged
its fuel oil into the water. A marine
salvor is removing sections of the wreck
from the bow and stern sections of the
grounded vessel, as well as from the
adjacent shoreline. The safety zone is
necessary to prevent unauthorized
vessels from impeding salvage
operations.
Discussion of Rule
The Unified Command, which is
responding to the grounding of the M/
V Selendang Ayu, identified the safety
zone in the area where subsequent
salvage operations will be taking place.
This area is defined by a circle centered
at 53 degrees, 38 minutes North; 167
degrees, 7 minutes, 20 seconds West
with a radius of 750 yards. All
coordinates reference Datum: NAD
1983.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential cost
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not significant under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). The Coast Guard expects the
economic impact of this rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory
Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the area defined by a circle centered at
53 degrees, 38 minutes North; 167
degrees, 7 minutes, 20 seconds West
with a radius of 750 yards.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. Vessel traffic
transiting from the north to south side
of Unalaska Island can pass safely
around the safety zone. We will
terminate the safety zone once salvage
operations are complete and the area
adjacent to the grounded vessel is
considered safe for vessel traffic. The
safety zone is not located in a navigable
channel.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Nov 22, 2005
Jkt 208001
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70733
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f). A final
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a final ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. From November 30, 2005 to
October 31, 2006, amend temporary
§ 165.T17–010 to read as follows:
I
§ 165.T17–010 Safety Zone; Bering Sea,
Aleutian Islands, Unalaska Island, AK.
(a) Description. This safety zone is
defined by a circle centered at 53
degrees, 38 minutes North; 167 degrees,
7 minutes, 20 seconds West with a
radius of 750 yards. All coordinates
reference Datum: NAD 1983.
(b) Enforcement period. The safety
zone in this section will be enforced
from November 30, 2005 through
October 31, 2006.
(c) Regulations. (1) The Captain of the
Port and the Duty Officer at Marine
Safety Office, Anchorage, Alaska can be
contacted at telephone number (907)
271–6700.
(2) The Captain of the Port may
authorize and designate any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer to act on his behalf in enforcing
the safety zone.
(3) The general regulations governing
safety zones contained in § 165.23
apply. No person or vessel may enter or
remain in this safety zone, with the
exception of attending vessels, without
first obtaining permission from the
Captain of the Port or his on-scene
representative.
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
70734
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: November 10, 2005.
M.R. DeVries,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Western Alaska.
[FR Doc. 05–23235 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ARCHITECTURAL AND
TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS
COMPLIANCE BOARD
36 CFR Parts 1190 and 1191
[Docket No. 02–1]
RIN 3014–AA26
Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings
and Facilities; Architectural Barriers
Act (ABA) Accessibility Guidelines;
Public Rights-of-Way
Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board.
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft
guidelines.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board (Access Board) has placed in the
docket and on its Web site for public
review draft guidelines which address
accessibility in the public right-of-way.
The draft guidelines are under
consideration by the Board. The
purpose of placing the draft guidelines
in the docket is to facilitate gathering of
additional information for the regulatory
assessment and the preparation of
technical assistance materials to
accompany a future rule. The Board is
not seeking comments on the draft
guidelines. The Board will issue a
notice of proposed rulemaking at a
future date and will solicit comments at
that time, prior to issuing a final rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Windley, Office of Technical and
Information Services, Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board, 1331 F Street, NW., suite 1000,
Washington, DC 20004–1111.
Telephone number (202) 272–0025
(voice); (202) 272–0082 (TTY).
Electronic mail address:
windley@access-board.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1999,
the Architectural and Transportation
Barriers Compliance Board (Access
Board) established the Public Rights-ofWay Access Advisory Committee
(Committee) to make recommendations
on accessibility guidelines for newly
constructed and altered public rights-ofway covered by the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 and the
Architectural Barriers Act of 1968. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Nov 22, 2005
Jkt 208001
Committee was comprised of
representatives from disability
organizations, public works
departments, transportation and traffic
engineering groups, design professionals
and civil engineers, pedestrian and
bicycle organizations, Federal agencies,
and standard-setting bodies. The
Committee met on five occasions
between December 1999 and January
2001. On January 10, 2001, the
Committee presented its
recommendations on accessible public
rights-of-way in a report entitled
‘‘Building a True Community.’’ The
Committee’s report provided
recommendations on access to
sidewalks, street crossings, and other
related pedestrian facilities and
addressed various issues and design
constraints specific to public rights-ofway. The report is available on the
Access Board’s Web site at https://
www.access-board.gov/prowac/
commrept/index.htm or can be ordered
by calling the Access Board at (202)
272–0080. Persons using a TTY should
call (202) 272–0082. The report is
available in alternate formats upon
request. Persons who want a copy in an
alternate format should specify the type
of format (cassette tape, braille, large
print, or ASCII disk).
The Access Board convened an ad hoc
committee of Board members to review
the Committee’s recommendations.
After reviewing the report in detail, the
Board’s ad hoc committee prepared
recommendations for guidelines
addressing accessibility in the public
right-of-way. On June 17, 2002, the
Board made the recommendations of the
ad hoc committee available for public
comment and review by notice in the
Federal Register (67 FR 41206).
Over 1,400 comments were received
from the public in response to the
publication of the draft. Of this total,
almost 900 comments were from
persons with disabilities and groups
representing them; the great
preponderance of comments in this
category came from people who
indicated that they were blind or had
low vision. Respondents from the
transportation industry, including
design engineers and consultants,
submitted slightly over 200 comments.
Another 100 were received from State
and local government administrative
agencies. Comments are posted on the
Board’s Web site at https://www.accessboard.gov/prowac/comments/
index.htm. Further discussion of the
comments received is available in the
supplementary information
accompanying the draft guidelines.
The members of the Board’s ad hoc
committee subsequently reviewed and
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
considered the comments received in
response to the 2002 Federal Register
notice. The draft guidelines made
available today on the Board’s Web site
are the result of those deliberations. The
Access Board is making the draft
guidelines available in order to facilitate
the gathering of additional information
for a regulatory assessment prior to
publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking and to assist in the
development of technical assistance
materials. The Board is not soliciting
comments on the draft guidelines. The
Board will solicit comments when a
proposed rule is issued in conjunction
with the regulatory assessment. The
draft guidelines along with
supplementary information have been
placed in the rulemaking docket (Docket
No. 02–1) for public review. The draft
guidelines and supplementary
information are also available on the
Access Board’s Web site at https://
www.access-board.gov/prowac/
draft.htm. You may also obtain a copy
of the draft guidelines and
supplementary information by
contacting the Access Board at (202)
272–0080. Persons using a TTY should
call (202) 272–0082. The documents are
available in alternate formats upon
request. Persons who want a copy in an
alternate format should specify the type
of format (cassette tape, braille, large
print, or ASCII disk).
Lawrence W. Roffee,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 05–23161 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R09–OAR–2005–CA–0006; FRL–7998–4]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Imperial and
Santa Barbara County Air Pollution
Control Districts
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the
Imperial County Air Pollution Control
District (ICAPCD) and Santa Barbara
County Air Pollution Control District
(SBCAPCD) portions of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). Under
authority of the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), we
are approving local rules that are
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70732-70734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23235]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP Western Alaska-04-003]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, Unalaska Island, AK
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule; change of effective period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is extending the effective period of the
safety zone in the Bering Sea, Unalaska Island, Alaska. The zone is
needed to facilitate safe salvage operations related to the grounding
of the merchant vessel (M/V) SELENDANG AYU. Entry of vessels or persons
into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the
Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District, the Coast Guard Captain of
the Port, Western Alaska, or their on-scene representative. The
intended effect of the proposed safety zone is to mitigate safety risks
to salvage personnel.
DATES: The effective period of Sec. 165.T17-010 is extended from
November 30, 2005 through October 31, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are available for inspection and copying at Coast Guard
Marine Safety Office Anchorage, 510 ``L'' Street, Suite 100, Anchorage,
AK 99501. Normal Office hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Meredith Gillman, Marine Safety
Office Anchorage, at (907) 271-6700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM and for making this regulation
effective less than 30 days after its publication in the Federal
Register. Any delay encountered in this regulation's effective date
would be contrary to public interest because immediate action is needed
to prevent unauthorized vessel traffic from hindering salvage
operations.
The Coast Guard will terminate the zone when salvage operations are
complete and the area adjacent to the grounded vessel is considered
safe to vessel traffic.
Background and Purpose
The M/V SELENDANG AYU ran aground at a position of 53.634[deg] N,
167.125[deg] W on December 9, 2004. The vessel then broke in half and
discharged its fuel oil into the water. A marine salvor is removing
sections of the wreck from the bow and stern sections of the grounded
vessel, as well as from the adjacent shoreline. The safety zone is
necessary to prevent unauthorized vessels from impeding salvage
operations.
Discussion of Rule
The Unified Command, which is responding to the grounding of the M/
V Selendang Ayu, identified the safety zone in the area where
subsequent salvage operations will be taking place. This area is
defined by a circle centered at 53 degrees, 38 minutes North; 167
degrees, 7 minutes, 20 seconds West with a radius of 750 yards. All
coordinates reference Datum: NAD 1983.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential cost and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not significant under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this
rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph
10(e) of the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
[[Page 70733]]
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the area defined by a circle centered at 53 degrees, 38
minutes North; 167 degrees, 7 minutes, 20 seconds West with a radius of
750 yards.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Vessel
traffic transiting from the north to south side of Unalaska Island can
pass safely around the safety zone. We will terminate the safety zone
once salvage operations are complete and the area adjacent to the
grounded vessel is considered safe for vessel traffic. The safety zone
is not located in a navigable channel.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). A final
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final ``Categorical
Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 165 as follows:
PART 165--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. From November 30, 2005 to October 31, 2006, amend temporary Sec.
165.T17-010 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T17-010 Safety Zone; Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, Unalaska
Island, AK.
(a) Description. This safety zone is defined by a circle centered
at 53 degrees, 38 minutes North; 167 degrees, 7 minutes, 20 seconds
West with a radius of 750 yards. All coordinates reference Datum: NAD
1983.
(b) Enforcement period. The safety zone in this section will be
enforced from November 30, 2005 through October 31, 2006.
(c) Regulations. (1) The Captain of the Port and the Duty Officer
at Marine Safety Office, Anchorage, Alaska can be contacted at
telephone number (907) 271-6700.
(2) The Captain of the Port may authorize and designate any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer to act on his behalf in
enforcing the safety zone.
(3) The general regulations governing safety zones contained in
Sec. 165.23 apply. No person or vessel may enter or remain in this
safety zone, with the exception of attending vessels, without first
obtaining permission from the Captain of the Port or his on-scene
representative.
[[Page 70734]]
Dated: November 10, 2005.
M.R. DeVries,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Western Alaska.
[FR Doc. 05-23235 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P