Tralkoxydim; Pesticide Tolerance, 70737-70740 [05-23106]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
by rule (PBR). The direct final action
was published without prior proposal
because EPA anticipated no adverse
comment. EPA stated in the direct final
rule that if EPA received adverse
comment by October 28, 2005, EPA
would publish a timely withdrawal in
the Federal Register. EPA subsequently
received a timely adverse comment on
the direct final rule. Therefore, EPA is
withdrawing the direct final approval.
EPA will address the comment in a
subsequent final action based on the
parallel proposal also published on
September 28, 2005 (70 FR 56612). As
stated in the parallel proposal, EPA will
not institute a second comment period
on this action.
DATES: The direct final rule published
on September 28, 2005 (70 FR 56566) is
withdrawn as of November 23, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley M. Spruiell, Air Permits Section
(6PD–R), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
telephone (214) 665–7212; fax number
214–665–7263; e-mail address
spruiell.stanley@epa.gov.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: November 15, 2005.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 05–23216 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP–2005–0175; FRL–7722–6]
Tralkoxydim; Pesticide Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a
tolerance for residues of tralkoxydim in
or on barley grain, barley hay, barley
straw, wheat grain, and wheat hay,
wheat forage, and wheat straw.
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.
requested this tolerance under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), as amended by the Food
Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
November 23, 2005. Objections and
15:18 Nov 22, 2005
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
requests for hearings must be received
on or before January 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: To submit a written
objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in
Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
identification (ID) number OPP–2005–
0175. All documents in the docket are
listed in the EDOCKET index at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed
in the index, some information is not
publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the Public Information and
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm.
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Tompkins, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–5697; e-mail
address:Tompkins.Jim@epa.gov.
Jkt 208001
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g.,
agricultural workers; greenhouse,
nursery, and floriculture workers;
farmers.
• Animal production (NAICS 112),
e.g., cattle ranchers and farmers, dairy
cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
• Food manufacturing (NAICS 311),
e.g., agricultural workers; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; ranchers; pesticide applicators.
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
32532), e.g., agricultural workers;
commercial applicators; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70737
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document and Other Related
Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET (https://
www.epa.gov/edocket/), you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A
frequently updated electronic version of
40 CFR part 180 is available at E-CFR
Beta Site Two at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of June 22,
2005 (70 FR 36162) (FRL–7715–6), EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section
408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 6F4631) by
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., P.O. Box
18300, Greensboro, NC, 27419–8300.
The petition requested that 40 CFR
180.548 be amended by establishing a
tolerance for residues of the herbicide
tralkoxydim, 2-(Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-[1(ethoxyimino)propyl]-3-hydroxy-5(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-(9Cl), in or on
barley grain, barley hay, wheat grain,
and wheat hay at 0.02 parts per million
(ppm) and barley straw, wheat forage,
and wheat straw at 0.05 ppm. That
notice included a summary of the
petition prepared by Syngenta Crop
Protection, Inc., the registrant.
Public comments were received from
B. Sachau who objected to the ‘‘sale or
marketing’’ of this product. She asserted
that the registrant’s statement in the
notice of filing that ‘‘it is unlikely’’ that
secondary residues would occur in
animal commodities is not a ‘‘strong
enough’’ standard. B. Sachau’s
comments contained no scientific data
or evidence to rebut the Agency’s
conclusion that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to tralkoxydim,
including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information. EPA
has determined that there is no
reasonable expectation of dietary risk
due to residues of tralkoxydim
occurring in meat, milk, poultry, or eggs
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
70738
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
from its use on wheat and barley based
on low levels of residues in wheat and
barley and risk assessments that were
conducted by the Agency. EPA has
responded to B. Sachau’s generalized
comments on numerous previous
occasions (see 70 FR 1349, 1354
(January 7, 2005); 69 FR 63083, 63096
(October 29, 2004).
Time limited tolerances for these
commodities were previously
established in the Federal Register of
August 13, 2003 (68 FR 48299) (FRL–
7315–9). The tolerances expired on May
1, 2005. The tolerances were time
limited because a second species
carcinogenicity study needed to be
submitted and reviewed. The study was
submitted and reviewed and is
discussed below.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
EPA performs a number of analyses to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide residues. For
further discussion of the regulatory
requirements of section 408 of FFDCA
and a complete description of the risk
assessment process, see the final rule on
Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances (62 FR
62961, November 26, 1997) (FRL–5754–
7).
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)
of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess
the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure,
consistent with section 408(b)(2) of
FFDCA, for a tolerance for residues of
tralkoxydim on barley grain, barley hay,
wheat grain, and wheat hay at 0.02 parts
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Nov 22, 2005
Jkt 208001
per million (ppm) and barley straw,
wheat forage, and wheat straw at 0.05
ppm.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and
risks associated with establishing the
tolerance was discussed in the Federal
Register final rule of December 16, 1998
(63 FR 69194) (FRL–6048–4).
The only new data that have been
submitted since this prior action are
data from the second species
carcinogenicity study. Based on this
study, EPA downgraded the cancer
classification of tralkoxydim from
‘‘likely human carcinogen’’ to
‘‘suggestive evidence of
carcinogenicity.’’ This classification was
based on the occurrence of benign
testicular tumors at the high dose in
male rats and equivocal evidence of
carcinogenicity in female hamsters. In
light of the prior cancer classification,
EPA had previously conducted a
quantitative cancer risk assessment for
tralkoxydim and concluded that the
cancer risk was negligible. Given that
the new data indicate that tralkoxydim
is less likely to be carcinogenic, EPA
finds that its earlier cancer risk
assessment more than adequately
demonstrates that tralkoxydim poses a
negligible cancer risk. Accordingly, in
reliance on its previous risk assessment,
as presented in the December 16, 1998
notice, and the new cancer study, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the
general population, and to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to
tralkoxydim residues.
IV. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerance is established
for residues of tralkoxydim, 2(Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-[1(ethoxyimino)propyl]-3-hydroxy-5(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-(9Cl), in or on
the raw agricultural commodity barley
grain, barley hay, wheat grain, and
wheat hay at 0.02 ppm and barley straw,
wheat forage, and wheat straw at 0.05
ppm.
V. Objections and Hearing Requests
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as
amended by FQPA, any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this
regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA
procedural regulations which govern the
submission of objections and requests
for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
Although the procedures in those
regulations require some modification to
reflect the amendments made to FFDCA
by FQPA, EPA will continue to use
those procedures, with appropriate
adjustments, until the necessary
modifications can be made. The new
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
section 408(g) of FFDCA provides
essentially the same process for persons
to ‘‘object’’ to a regulation for an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance issued by EPA under new
section 408(d) of FFDCA, as was
provided in the old sections 408 and
409 of FFDCA. However, the period for
filing objections is now 60 days, rather
than 30 days.
A. What Do I Need to Do to File an
Objection or Request a Hearing?
You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in this unit and in 40 CFR part
178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
you must identify docket ID number
OPP–2005–0175 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
on or before January 23, 2006.
1. Filing the request. Your objection
must specify the specific provisions in
the regulation that you object to, and the
grounds for the objections (40 CFR
178.25). If a hearing is requested, the
objections must include a statement of
the factual issues(s) on which a hearing
is requested, the requestor’s contentions
on such issues, and a summary of any
evidence relied upon by the objector (40
CFR 178.27). Information submitted in
connection with an objection or hearing
request may be claimed confidential by
marking any part or all of that
information as CBI. Information so
marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2. A copy of the
information that does not contain CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public record. Information not marked
confidential may be disclosed publicly
by EPA without prior notice.
Mail your written request to: Office of
the Hearing Clerk (1900L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. You may also deliver
your request to the Office of the Hearing
Clerk in Suite 350, 1099 14th St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20005. The Office of
the Hearing Clerk is open from 8 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Office of the Hearing
Clerk is (202) 564–6255.
2. Copies for the Docket. In addition
to filing an objection or hearing request
with the Hearing Clerk as described in
Unit VI.A., you should also send a copy
of your request to the PIRIB for its
inclusion in the official record that is
described in ADDRESSES. Mail your
copies, identified by docket ID number
OPP–2005–0175, to: Public Information
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
and Records Integrity Branch,
Information Technology and Resource
Management Division (7502C), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001. In person or by courier, bring a
copy to the location of the PIRIB
described in ADDRESSES. You may also
send an electronic copy of your request
via e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov.
Please use an ASCII file format and
avoid the use of special characters and
any form of encryption. Copies of
electronic objections and hearing
requests will also be accepted on disks
in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 or ASCII file
format. Do not include any CBI in your
electronic copy. You may also submit an
electronic copy of your request at many
Federal Depository Libraries.
B. When Will the Agency Grant a
Request for a Hearing?
A request for a hearing will be granted
if the Administrator determines that the
material submitted shows the following:
There is a genuine and substantial issue
of fact; there is a reasonable possibility
that available evidence identified by the
requestor would, if established resolve
one or more of such issues in favor of
the requestor, taking into account
uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual
issues(s) in the manner sought by the
requestor would be adequate to justify
the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
under section 408(d) of FFDCA in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has
been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any
enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public
Law 104–4). Nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Nov 22, 2005
Jkt 208001
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or OMB review or any Agency
action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are
established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply. In addition, the
Agency has determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires
EPA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ is
defined in the Executive Order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ This final rule
directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers and food
retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of section 408(n)(4) of
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the
Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ‘‘tribal implications’’
as described in Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop
an accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70739
implications’’ is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
rule will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
VII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of this final
rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: October 28, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—AMENDED
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.548 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
I
§ 180.548 Tralkoxydim; tolerances for
residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are
established for residues of the herbicide,
tralkoxydim, 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-[1(ethoxyimino)propyl]-3-hydroxy-5-
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
70740
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Indiana authorization for changes to its
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act program, listed in Section F of that
Parts per
notice, which was subject to public
million
comment. No comments were received.
We hereby determine that Indiana’s
0.02
0.02 hazardous waste program revisions
0.05 satisfy all of the requirements necessary
0.05 to qualify for final authorization.
(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-(9Cl) in or on
the raw agricultural commodities:
Commodity
Barley, grain .............................
Barley, hay ................................
Barley, straw .............................
Wheat, forage ...........................
Wheat, grain .............................
Wheat, hay ...............................
Wheat, straw .............................
*
*
*
*
0.02
0.02
0.05
*
[FR Doc. 05–23106 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[FRL–8001–3]
Indiana: Final Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA is granting Indiana
Final authorization of the changes to its
hazardous waste program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). The agency published a
proposed rule on June 30, 2005 at 70 FR
37726 and provided for public
comment. The public comment period
ended on August 1, 2005. We received
no comments. No further opportunity
for comment will be provided. EPA has
determined that these changes satisfy all
requirements needed to qualify for Final
authorization, and is authorizing the
State’s changes through this proposed
final action.
DATES: This final authorization will be
effective on November 23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You can view and copy
Indiana’s application from 9 a.m. to 4
p.m. at the following addresses: Indiana
Department of Environmental
Management, 100 North Senate,
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46204–2210,
contact Steve Mojonnier (317) 233–
1655, or Lynn West (317) 232–3593; and
EPA Region 5, contact Gary Westefer at
the following address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Westefer, Indiana Regulatory Specialist,
U.S. EPA Region 5, DM–7J, 77 West
JacksonBoulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 886–7450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
30, 2005, U.S. EPA published a
proposed rule proposing to grant
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Nov 22, 2005
Jkt 208001
A. Why Are Revisions to State
Programs Necessary?
States which have received final
authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to State programs may
be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, States must
change their programs because of
changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in
This Rule?
We conclude that Indiana’s
application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and
regulatory requirements established by
RCRA. Therefore, we propose to grant
Indiana Final authorization to operate
its hazardous waste program with the
changes described in the authorization
application. Indiana has responsibility
for permitting Treatment, Storage, and
Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within its
borders (except in Indian Country) and
for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA
program described in its revised
program application, subject to the
limitations of the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA).
New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that EPA promulgates under
the authority of HSWA take effect in
authorized States before they are
authorized for the requirements. Thus,
EPA will implement those requirements
and prohibitions in Indiana, including
issuing permits, until the State is
granted authorization to do so.
C. What Is the Effect of Today’s
Authorization Decision?
This decision means that a facility in
Indiana subject to RCRA will now have
to comply with the authorized State
requirements (listed in section F of this
notice) instead of the equivalent Federal
requirements in order to comply with
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RCRA. Indiana has enforcement
responsibilities under its State
hazardous waste program for violations
of such program, but EPA retains its
authority under RCRA sections 3007,
3008, 3013, and 7003, which include,
among others, authority to:
1. Do inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses or reports.
2. Enforce RCRA requirements and
suspend or revoke permits.
3. Take enforcement actions
regardless of whether the State has
taken its own actions.
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations for which Indiana is being
authorized by today’s action are already
effective, and are not changed by today’s
action.
D. Proposed Rule
On June 30, 2005 (70 FR 37726), EPA
published a proposed rule. In that rule
we proposed granting authorization of
changes to Indiana’s hazardous waste
program and opened our decision to
public comment. The Agency received
no comments on this proposal. EPA
found Indiana’s RCRA program to be
satisfactory.
E. What Has Indiana Previously Been
Authorized For?
Indiana initially received Final
authorization on January 31, 1986,
effective January 31, 1986 (51 FR 3955),
to implement the RCRA hazardous
waste management program. We granted
authorization for changes to their
program on October 31, 1986, effective
December 31, 1986 (51 FR 39752);
January 5, 1988, effective January 19,
1988 (53 FR 128); July 13, 1989,
effective September 11, 1989 (54 FR
29557); July 23, 1991, effective
September 23, 1991 (56 FR 33717); July
24, 1991, effective September 23, 1991
(56 FR 33866); July 29, 1991, effective
September 27, 1991 (56 FR 35831); July
30, 1991, effective September 30, 1991
(56 FR 36010); August 20, 1996,
effective October 21, 1996 (61 FR
43018); September 1, 1999, effective
November 30, 1999 (64 FR 47692);
January 4, 2001 effective January 4,
2001, (66 FR 733); December 6, 2001,
effective December 6, 2001 (66 FR
63331); and October 29, 2004, effective
October 29, 2004 (69 FR 63100).
F. What Changes Are We Authorizing
With Today’s Action?
On August 30, 2004, Indiana
submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking
authorization of their changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. We
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70737-70740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23106]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP-2005-0175; FRL-7722-6]
Tralkoxydim; Pesticide Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of
tralkoxydim in or on barley grain, barley hay, barley straw, wheat
grain, and wheat hay, wheat forage, and wheat straw. Syngenta Crop
Protection, Inc. requested this tolerance under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act
of 1996 (FQPA).
DATES: This regulation is effective November 23, 2005. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before January 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: To submit a written objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
identification (ID) number OPP-2005-0175. All documents in the docket
are listed in the EDOCKET index at https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in EDOCKET or in hard copy at the Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1801 S.
Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Tompkins, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 305-5697; e-mail address:Tompkins.Jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g., agricultural workers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; farmers.
Animal production (NAICS 112), e.g., cattle ranchers and
farmers, dairy cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
Food manufacturing (NAICS 311), e.g., agricultural
workers; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers;
ranchers; pesticide applicators.
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532), e.g., agricultural
workers; commercial applicators; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and
floriculture workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other
Related Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET (https://www.epa.gov/edocket/), you may
access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA
Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at https://www.epa.gov/
fedrgstr/. A frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
is available at E-CFR Beta Site Two at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of June 22, 2005 (70 FR 36162) (FRL-7715-
6), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
6F4631) by Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro,
NC, 27419-8300. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.548 be amended
by establishing a tolerance for residues of the herbicide tralkoxydim,
2-(Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)propyl]-3-hydroxy-5-(2,4,6-
trimethylphenyl)-(9Cl), in or on barley grain, barley hay, wheat grain,
and wheat hay at 0.02 parts per million (ppm) and barley straw, wheat
forage, and wheat straw at 0.05 ppm. That notice included a summary of
the petition prepared by Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., the
registrant.
Public comments were received from B. Sachau who objected to the
``sale or marketing'' of this product. She asserted that the
registrant's statement in the notice of filing that ``it is unlikely''
that secondary residues would occur in animal commodities is not a
``strong enough'' standard. B. Sachau's comments contained no
scientific data or evidence to rebut the Agency's conclusion that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate
exposure to tralkoxydim, including all anticipated dietary exposures
and all other exposures for which there is reliable information. EPA
has determined that there is no reasonable expectation of dietary risk
due to residues of tralkoxydim occurring in meat, milk, poultry, or
eggs
[[Page 70738]]
from its use on wheat and barley based on low levels of residues in
wheat and barley and risk assessments that were conducted by the
Agency. EPA has responded to B. Sachau's generalized comments on
numerous previous occasions (see 70 FR 1349, 1354 (January 7, 2005); 69
FR 63083, 63096 (October 29, 2004).
Time limited tolerances for these commodities were previously
established in the Federal Register of August 13, 2003 (68 FR 48299)
(FRL-7315-9). The tolerances expired on May 1, 2005. The tolerances
were time limited because a second species carcinogenicity study needed
to be submitted and reviewed. The study was submitted and reviewed and
is discussed below.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408 of FFDCA and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see the final rule on
Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances (62 FR 62961, November 26, 1997) (FRL-
5754-7).
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to
make a determination on aggregate exposure, consistent with section
408(b)(2) of FFDCA, for a tolerance for residues of tralkoxydim on
barley grain, barley hay, wheat grain, and wheat hay at 0.02 parts per
million (ppm) and barley straw, wheat forage, and wheat straw at 0.05
ppm.
EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with
establishing the tolerance was discussed in the Federal Register final
rule of December 16, 1998 (63 FR 69194) (FRL-6048-4).
The only new data that have been submitted since this prior action
are data from the second species carcinogenicity study. Based on this
study, EPA downgraded the cancer classification of tralkoxydim from
``likely human carcinogen'' to ``suggestive evidence of
carcinogenicity.'' This classification was based on the occurrence of
benign testicular tumors at the high dose in male rats and equivocal
evidence of carcinogenicity in female hamsters. In light of the prior
cancer classification, EPA had previously conducted a quantitative
cancer risk assessment for tralkoxydim and concluded that the cancer
risk was negligible. Given that the new data indicate that tralkoxydim
is less likely to be carcinogenic, EPA finds that its earlier cancer
risk assessment more than adequately demonstrates that tralkoxydim
poses a negligible cancer risk. Accordingly, in reliance on its
previous risk assessment, as presented in the December 16, 1998 notice,
and the new cancer study, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the general population, and to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to tralkoxydim residues.
IV. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerance is established for residues of
tralkoxydim, 2-(Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)propyl]-3-hydroxy-
5-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-(9Cl), in or on the raw agricultural
commodity barley grain, barley hay, wheat grain, and wheat hay at 0.02
ppm and barley straw, wheat forage, and wheat straw at 0.05 ppm.
V. Objections and Hearing Requests
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, any person may
file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request
a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which
govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in
40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those regulations require
some modification to reflect the amendments made to FFDCA by FQPA, EPA
will continue to use those procedures, with appropriate adjustments,
until the necessary modifications can be made. The new section 408(g)
of FFDCA provides essentially the same process for persons to
``object'' to a regulation for an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance issued by EPA under new section 408(d) of FFDCA, as was
provided in the old sections 408 and 409 of FFDCA. However, the period
for filing objections is now 60 days, rather than 30 days.
A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit
and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number OPP-2005-0175 in the subject line on the
first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and
must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before January
23, 2006.
1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific
provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for
the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the
objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a
hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a
summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27).
Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing
request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that
information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the
information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. You may also deliver your request to the
Office of the Hearing Clerk in Suite 350, 1099 14\th\ St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20005. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is open from 8
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is (202) 564-6255.
2. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VI.A., you
should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its inclusion
in the official record that is described in ADDRESSES. Mail your
copies, identified by docket ID number OPP-2005-0175, to: Public
Information
[[Page 70739]]
and Records Integrity Branch, Information Technology and Resource
Management Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the
location of the PIRIB described in ADDRESSES. You may also send an
electronic copy of your request via e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov.
Please use an ASCII file format and avoid the use of special characters
and any form of encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing
requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 or ASCII
file format. Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may
also submit an electronic copy of your request at many Federal
Depository Libraries.
B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?
A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would,
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the
requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40
CFR 178.32).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does
not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose
any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4). Nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does
not involve any technical standards that would require Agency
consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a
petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has
determined that this rule does not have any ``tribal implications'' as
described in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6,
2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.''
``Policies that have tribal implications'' is defined in the Executive
Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.''
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
this rule.
VII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 28, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--AMENDED
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Section 180.548 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 180.548 Tralkoxydim; tolerances for residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are established for residues of the
herbicide, tralkoxydim, 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)propyl]-
3-hydroxy-5-
[[Page 70740]]
(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-(9Cl) in or on the raw agricultural
commodities:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barley, grain.............................................. 0.02
Barley, hay................................................ 0.02
Barley, straw.............................................. 0.05
Wheat, forage.............................................. 0.05
Wheat, grain............................................... 0.02
Wheat, hay................................................. 0.02
Wheat, straw............................................... 0.05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-23106 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S