Permits for Recreation on Public Lands, 70570-70574 [05-23113]
Download as PDF
70570
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
would have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution or use of
energy. This proposed rule would
provide limited, temporary flexibility to
entities in the highway diesel
distribution system downstream of the
refineries and import facilities. Other
proposed amendments contained in
today’s action pertain to ensuring the
enforceability of the highway diesel
program. The remaining proposed
amendments in today’s rule would
provide technical correction and
clarification to the requirements under
the highway diesel, the nonroad diesel,
and the Tier 2 gasoline programs.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless doing so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (such as materials
specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that
are developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies. NTTAA
directs EPA to provide Congress,
through OMB, explanations when the
Agency decides not to use available and
applicable voluntary consensus
standards.
This proposed rule does not involve
technical standards. Thus, we have
determined that the requirements of the
NTTAA do not apply.
II. Statutory Provisions and Legal
Requirements
The statutory authority for this action
comes from sections 211(c) and (i) of the
Clean Air Act as amended 42 U.S.C.
7545(c) and (i). This action is a
rulemaking subject to the provisions of
Clean Air Act section 307(d). See 42
U.S.C. 7606(d)(1). Additional support
for the procedural and enforcement
related aspects of the rule comes from
sections 144(a) and 301(a) of the Clean
Air Act. 42 U.S.C. 7414(a) and 7601(a).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80
Environmental protection, Diesel fuel,
Fuel additives, Gasoline, Motor vehicle
Pollution, Penalties, Recordkeeping and
reporting requirements.
Dated: November 8, 2005.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–22806 Filed 11–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:30 Nov 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
IV. Procedural Matters
Bureau of Land Management
I. Public Comment Procedures
43 CFR Part 2930
A. How do I comment on the proposed
rule?
If you wish to comment, you may
submit your comments by any one of
several methods.
• You may mail comments to Director
(630), Bureau of Land Management,
Administrative Record, Room 401 LS,
Eastern States Office, 7450 Boston
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153.
• You may deliver comments to
Room 401, 1620 L Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20036.
• You may comment on the rule at
the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• You may also comment via e-mail
to: comments_washington@blm.gov.
Please make your comments on the
proposed rule as specific as possible,
confine them to issues pertinent to the
proposed rule, and explain the reason
for any changes you recommend. Where
possible, your comments should
reference the specific section or
paragraph of the proposal that you are
addressing.
BLM may not necessarily consider or
include in the Administrative Record
for the final rule comments that BLM
receives after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) or comments
delivered to an address other than those
listed above (see ADDRESSES).
RIN: 1004–AD68
[WO–250–1220–PA–24 1A]
Permits for Recreation on Public
Lands
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
update the regulations of the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) that tell how
to obtain recreation permits for
commercial recreational operations,
competitive events and activities,
organized group activities and events,
and individual recreational use of
special areas.
The proposed rule is needed to
remove from the regulations
inconsistencies with the Federal Lands
Recreation Enhancement Act (REA),
which authorizes the Secretaries of the
Interior and Agriculture to establish,
modify, charge, and collect recreation
fees at Federal recreation lands and
waters for the next 10 years.
DATES: You should submit your
comments by January 23, 2006. BLM
will not necessarily consider comments
postmarked or received by messenger or
electronic mail after the above date in
the decisionmaking process on the
proposed rule.
ADDRESSES:
Mail: Director (630), Bureau of Land
Management, Administrative Record,
Room 401-LS, Eastern States Office,
7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield,
Virginia 22153.
Personal or messenger delivery: Room
401, 1620 L Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20036.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Internet e-mail:
comments_washington@blm.gov.
(Include ‘‘Attn: AD68’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee
Larson at (202) 452–5168 as to the
substance of the proposed rule, or Ted
Hudson at (202) 452–5042 as to
procedural matters. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may contact either individual by
calling the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at (800) 877–8339, 24
hours a day, 7 days a week.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Comment Procedures
II. Background
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
B. May I review comments submitted by
others?
Comments, including names and
street addresses of respondents, will be
available for public review at the
address listed under ‘‘ADDRESSES:
Personal or messenger delivery’’ during
regular business hours (7:45 a.m. to 4:15
p.m.), Monday through Friday, except
holidays.
Individual respondents may request
confidentiality, which we will honor to
the extent allowable by law. If you wish
to withhold your name or address,
except for the city or town, you must
state this prominently at the beginning
of your comment. We will make all
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
II. Background
The REA was passed in the 2005
Omnibus Appropriations bill signed
into law on December 8, 2004. The Act
provides authority for 10 years for the
Secretaries of the Interior and
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Agriculture to establish, modify, charge,
and collect recreation fees for use of
some Federal recreation lands and
waters.
Section 13 of REA repealed certain
admission and use fee authorities,
including Section 4(a) through (i) of the
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act
of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l–6a et seq.), and
Section 315 of the Department of the
Interior and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 1996 (as contained
in section 101(c) of Public Law 104–134;
16 U.S.C. 460l–6a). The latter provision
authorized the Recreational Fee
Demonstration Program, which BLM has
used to fund many of our recreation
sites. Because these authorities have
been repealed, we need to amend BLM’s
recreation permit regulations to remove
references to them.
Under REA, BLM will—
• Reinvest a majority of fees back to
the site of collection to enhance visitor
services and reduce the backlog of
maintenance needs for recreation
facilities (including trail maintenance,
toilet facilities, boat ramps, hunting
blinds, interpretive signs and programs);
• Participate in an interagency fee
program that reduces the number of
national passes from four to one
allowing visitors access to all Federal
recreation lands and sites;
• Provide more opportunities for
public involvement in BLM’s
determination of recreation fee sites and
fees; and
• Provide for cooperation with
gateway communities through fee
management agreements for visitor and
recreation services, emergency medical
services, and law enforcement services.
BLM does not and will not charge a
fee for many recreation activities and
sites on public lands. The REA includes
additional provisions that build on
BLM’s past experiences in the recreation
fee program and improve the fee
program by clarifying the circumstances
in which fees may be charged. Under
the Act, BLM will not charge standard
or expanded amenity recreation fees
for—
• General access to BLM areas;
• Horseback riding, walking through,
driving through, or boating through
public lands where no facilities or
services are used;
• Access to overlooks or scenic
pullouts;
• Undesignated parking areas where
no facilities are provided; or
• Picnicking along roads or trails.
In addition, individuals under 16 will
not be charged an entrance or standard
amenity fee.
Under the REA, BLM will form and
use Recreation Resource Advisory
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:30 Nov 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
Committees for BLM sites and areas, or
in lieu of a Recreation Resource
Advisory Committee, may use a
Resource Advisory Committee under
another provision of law, to give
communities additional opportunities to
provide input on the establishment of a
specific recreation fee site or the
implementation of a fee, and will
provide other opportunities for notice
and public participation before
establishing a new fee. We will also
keep the visiting public informed on
how we are using fee revenues to
improve visitor facilities and services.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule makes changes in
the existing regulations on permits for
recreation on public lands in order to
bring them into conformance with the
law, including the REA. This section of
the preamble describes the changes
made in each section of the regulations.
Section 2931.3 What are the
authorities for these regulations?
The proposed rule would amend this
section to remove references to the
repealed authority, portions of the Land
and Water Conservation Fund Act, 16
U.S.C. 460l–6a, and add reference to the
REA. It explains that the REA authorizes
BLM to collect fees for recreational use
of certain kinds of areas, and to issue
special recreation permits for group
activities, such as commercial outings,
and recreation events, such as races or
traditional assemblies. The rule also
clarifies the authority contained in
Section 303 of the Federal Land Policy
and Management Act (FLPMA), 43
U.S.C. 1733. It also restates the
functions of 18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 et
seq., that they establish penalties of
fines and imprisonment for violation of
regulations. Finally, in this section, the
rule removes paragraph (b) discussing
36 CFR part 71, because the regulations
there are outdated.
Section 2932.57 Prohibited acts and
penalties.
In this section, which covers
prohibited acts and penalties related to
special recreation permits, the proposed
rule would amend paragraph (b)(3) by
removing reference to the Land and
Water Conservation Fund Act and
adding the REA in its place.
Section 12(d) of the REA establishes
limits on penalties for failure to pay
recreation fees established under the
Act. It provides for such failures to be
punishable as Class A or Class B
misdemeanors, but limits fines for a first
offense to $100. (Under 18 U.S.C. 3571
and 3581, a Class A misdemeanor is
subject to a penalty of not more than
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70571
$100,000 for an individual ($200,000 for
an organization) or one year in jail. A
Class B misdemeanor is subject to a fine
of not more than $5,000 for an
individual ($10,000 for an organization)
or six months in jail.) We have also
revised paragraph (b) of section 2932.57
to reflect this provision of the REA.
Section 2933.33
penalties.
Prohibited acts and
The proposed rule would amend this
section, which states prohibitions and
imposes penalties related to recreation
use permits, by removing references to
the Land and Water Conservation Fund
Act, and substituting REA, where
appropriate. To conform the prohibited
acts in paragraph (a) of the section with
the table of penalties in paragraph (d),
we have added a provision to paragraph
(a) requiring compliance with recreation
use permit stipulations and conditions.
The proposed rule would also remove
unnecessary internal cross-references in
this section, and correct inaccurate legal
citations.
IV. Procedural Matters
Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O.
12866)
This document is not a significant
rule and was not subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
under Executive Order 12866.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of
$100 million or more on the economy.
It will not adversely affect in a material
way the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or state, local, or
tribal governments or communities.
(2) This rule will not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency. The rule implements a
new statute that affects all land
managing agencies. The other agencies
are cooperating with BLM in developing
general guidelines for implementing the
statute.
(3) This rule does not alter the
budgetary effects or entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights
or obligations of their recipients. It
maintains current policies on user fees.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal
or policy issues. It cites new statutory
authority that does not have
substantially different effects on the
program or the public.
During fiscal year 2004, BLM issued
just over 109,000 Special Recreation
Permits of all kinds, with revenues
totaling a little over $8 million
deposited into the Land and Water
Conservation Fund (LWCF), the Fee
Demonstration Project, and other
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
70572
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
miscellaneous accounts. These numbers
are derived from the Public Land
Statistics, and represent an increase of
slightly more than fivefold since 1996.
On the other hand, according to the
American Recreation Coalition,
Americans spent more than $108 billion
on wildlife-related recreation (fishing,
hunting, birdwatching, and so forth)
alone. We give these numbers to
illustrate that the fees charged under
BLM’s recreation program are
minuscule compared with those
realized by the overall national
recreation industry. Special Recreation
Permits are generally obtained by
commercial outfitters and guides, river
running companies, sponsors of
competitive events, ‘‘snow bird’’
seasonal mobile home campers who use
BLM’s long-term visitor areas, and
private individuals and groups using
certain special areas. Under current
regulations, use fees are established by
the BLM Director, who may adjust them
from time to time to reflect changes in
costs and the market, and published
periodically in the Federal Register.
BLM may charge actual costs, subject to
certain limitations. During fiscal year
2004, BLM issued just over 655,000
Recreation Use Permits for use of fee
sites, with revenues totaling a little over
$5,200,000. We state these figures to
give some idea of the scope of the BLM
recreation program in economic terms,
and to show that the revenues from the
program do not approach $100 million
annually. The REA makes changes in
the authorities for BLM’s recreation fees,
but Section 3 of the Act does not change
the policy for setting those fees: ‘‘The
amount of the recreation fee shall be
commensurate with the benefits and
services provided to the visitor,’’ and
‘‘[t]he Secretary shall consider
comparable fees charged elsewhere and
by other public agencies and by nearby
private sector operators.’’ Thus, it is
clear that the changes in the proposed
rule will not have economic effects
exceeding $100 million annually.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). BLM recognizes that
most commercial recreation
enterprises—outfitters, guides, riverrunning companies, local retail
outlets—are small businesses, and that
over 5,000 of them annually hold BLM
commercial or competitive permits.
Nevertheless, this proposed rule does
not change permit fees, but rather
updates the regulations to reflect
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:30 Nov 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
changes in authorities for the fees and
changes their allocation. Penalties for
non-payment of fees would not affect
outfitters, event organizers, and other
commercial permittees, who must pay
the fees before receiving permits.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
• Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
See the discussion under Regulatory
Planning and Review, above.
• Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, state, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions. The rule will have
no effect on the 3 percent basic use fee
that BLM s fee schedule (set by the 1984
policy, not regulations) requires
outfitters to pay.
• Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The changes in the regulations required
by enactment of the REA will not lead
to increases in user fees or any other
cost factors that would impel
recreationists to travel to comparable
foreign recreation destinations.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on state, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on state, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector. The
rule has no effect on governmental or
Tribal entities. A statement containing
the information required by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, BLM finds that the rule does not
have significant takings implications.
The proposed rule does not provide for
forfeiture or derogation of private
property rights. It merely updates the
regulations to reflect changes in
statutory authorities for the BLM
recreation program covered by the
regulations. A takings implications
assessment is not required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, BLM finds that the rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement.
The rule does not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. The rule does not
preempt state law.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order
12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that this rule does not
unduly burden the judicial system and
meets the requirements of sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments.
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have found that this final rule
does not include policies that have
Tribal implications. The rule has no
effect on Tribal lands, and affect
member of Tribes only to the extent that
they use public lands and facilities for
recreation. The rule merely updates the
regulations to reflect changes in
statutory authorities.
E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not a significant energy
action. It will not have an adverse effect
on energy supplies. The rule does not
limit land use by energy companies. It
applies only to permits for recreational
use of public lands, how BLM collects
revenues and applies them to the
program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These regulations do not contain
information collection requirements that
the Office of Management and Budget
must approve under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.
National Environmental Policy Act
BLM has determined that this
proposed rule updating the recreation
permit regulations to recognize and
reflect changes in statutory authorities
governing the payment and allocation of
permit fees and the penalties for
nonpayment is a regulation of an
administrative, financial, legal, and
procedural nature. Therefore, it is
categorically excluded from
environmental review under section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act, pursuant to 516
Departmental Manual (DM), Chapter 2,
Appendix 1. In addition, the proposed
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
rule does not meet any of the 10 criteria
for exceptions to categorical exclusions
listed in 516 DM, Chapter 2, Appendix
2. Pursuant to Council on
Environmental Quality regulations (40
CFR 1508.4) and the environmental
policies and procedures of the
Department of the Interior, the term
‘‘categorical exclusions’’ means a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment and that have been found
to have no such effect in procedures
adopted by a Federal agency and for
which neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental
impact statement is required. Therefore,
a detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 is not
required.
Author
The principal author of this proposed
rule is Lee Larson of the Recreation
Group, Washington Office, BLM,
assisted by Ted Hudson of the
Regulatory Affairs Group, Washington
Office, BLM.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 2930
Penalties; Public lands; Recreation
and recreation areas; Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements; Surety
bonds.
For the reasons explained in the
preamble, and under the authority of 43
U.S.C. 1740, we propose to amend
chapter II, subtitle B of title 43 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
Dated: October 24, 2005.
Chad Calvert,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior,
Land and Minerals Management.
§ 2931.3 What are the authorities for these
regulations?
The statutory authorities underlying
the regulations in this part are the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act, 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., and the
Federal Land Recreation Enhancement
Act, 16 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.
(a) The Federal Land Policy and
Management Act (FLPMA) contains the
Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s)
general land use management authority
over the public lands, and establishes
outdoor recreation as one of the
principal uses of those lands (43 U.S.C.
1701(a)(8)). Section 302(b) of FLPMA
directs the Secretary of the Interior to
regulate through permits or other
instruments the use of the public lands,
which includes commercial recreation
use. Section 303 of FLPMA authorizes
BLM to promulgate and enforce
regulations, and establishes the
penalties for violations of the
regulations.
(b) The Federal Land Recreation
Enhancement Act (REA) authorizes
BLM to collect fees for recreational use
in areas meeting certain criteria (16
U.S.C. 6802(f) and (g)(2)), and to issue
special recreation permits for group
activities and recreation events (16
U.S.C. 6802(h).
(c) 18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 et seq.
establish sentences of fines and
imprisonment for violation of
regulations.
Subpart 2932—Special Recreation
Permits for Commercial Use,
Competitive Events, Organized
Groups, and Recreation Use in Special
Areas [Amended]
3. Amend section 2932.57 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 2932.57
PART 2930—PERMITS FOR
RECREATION ON PUBLIC LANDS
Prohibited acts and penalties.
*
1. The authority citation for part 2930
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1740; 16 U.S.C. 6802.
Subpart 2931—Permits for Recreation;
General
2. Revise section 2931.3 to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
(b) Penalties. (1) If you are convicted
of any act prohibited by paragraphs
(a)(2)–(a)(7) of this section, you may be
subject to a sentence of a fine or
imprisonment or both for a Class A
misdemeanor in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 et seq. under the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a)).
(2) If you are convicted of any act
prohibited by paragraph (a)(1) of this
70573
section, you may be subject to a
sentence of a fine not to exceed $100 for
the first offense, or a sentence of a fine
and or imprisonment for a Class A or B
misdemeanor in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 et seq. for all
subsequent offenses.
(3) You may also be subject to civil
action for unauthorized use of the
public lands or related waters and their
resources, for violations of permit terms,
conditions, or stipulations, or for uses
beyond those allowed by permit.
Subpart 2933—Recreation Use Permits
for Fee Areas
4. Amend section 2933.33 by revising
paragraphs (a), (b), and (d) to read as
follows:
§ 2933.33
Prohibited acts and penalties.
(a) Prohibited acts. You must not—
(1) Fail to obtain a use permit or pay
any fees required by this subpart;
(2) Violate the stipulations or
conditions of a permit issued under this
subpart;
(3) Fail to pay any fees within the
time specified;
(4) Fail to display any required proof
of payment of fees;
(5) Willfully and knowingly possess,
use, publish as true, or sell to another,
any forged, counterfeited, or altered
document or instrument used as proof
of or exemption from fee payment;
(6) Willfully and knowingly use any
document or instrument used as proof
of or exemption from fee payment, that
BLM issued to or intended another to
use; or
(7) Falsely represent yourself to be a
person to whom BLM has issued a
document or instrument used as proof
of or exemption from fee payment.
(b) Evidence of nonpayment. BLM
will consider failure to display proof of
payment on your unattended vehicle
parked within a fee area, where
payment is required to be prima facie
evidence of nonpayment.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Types of penalties. You may be
subject to the following fines or
penalties for violating the provisions of
this subpart:
If you are convicted of * * *
then you may be subject to * * *
under * * *
(1) Any act prohibited by paragraph (a)(4), (5),
or (6) of this section.
A sentence of a fine and/or imprisonment for
a Class A misdemeanor in accordance with
18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 et seq.
A sentence of a fine and/or imprisonment for
a Class A misdemeanor in accordance with
18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 et seq.
The Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a)).
(2) Violating any regulation in this subpart or
any condition of a Recreation Use Permit.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:30 Nov 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a)).
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
70574
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
If you are convicted of * * *
then you may be subject to * * *
under * * *
(3) Any act prohibited by paragraph (a)(1), (2),
or (3) of this section.
A fine not to exceed $100 for the first offense,
or a sentence of a fine and/or imprisonment
for a Class A or B misdemeanor in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 et seq.
for all subsequent offenses.
The Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement
Act (16 U.S.C. 6811).
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–0050–
P, P.O. Box 8014, Baltimore, MD 21244–
8014.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–0050–P, Mail Stop C4–26–05,
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments (one original
and two copies) before the close of the
comment period to one of the following
addresses. If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786–
7195 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Room 445–G, Hubert H. Humphrey
Building, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20201; or, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
(Because access to the interior of the
HHH Building is not readily available to
persons without Federal Government
identification, commenters are
encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main
lobby of the building. A stamp-in clock
is available for persons wishing to retain
a proof of filing by stamping in and
retaining an extra copy of the comments
being filed.)
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lorraine Doo, 410–786–6597.
Submitting Comments: We welcome
comments from the public on all issues
set forth in the September 23, 2005
proposed rule to assist us in fully
considering issues, developing policies
and adopting standards. You can assist
us by referencing the file code CMS–
0050–P and the specific ‘‘issue
identifier’’ that precedes the section on
which you choose to comment.
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. CMS posts all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on its public Web site
as soon as possible after they have been
received. Comments received timely
will be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 23, 2005, we published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(70 FR 55990) that would recommend
the adoption of a set of standards to
facilitate the electronic exchange of
clinical and administrative data to
further improve the claims adjudication
process when additional documentation
is required. This rule proposes two
X12N transaction standards: One to
request the information, and one to
respond to that request with the answer
or additional information. This rule also
proposes the use of Health Level 7 (HL7)
specifications for the content and format
of communicating the actual clinical
information. Finally, this rule proposes
the adoption of the Logical Observation
Identifiers, Names and Codes or
LOINC for specific identification of the
additional information being requested,
and the coded answers that respond to
the requests. Due to the highly technical
nature of the materials, and the size
(length) of the technical documents
being reviewed, we want to provide
additional time for the industry to
review and comment upon all of the
technical documents (implementation
guides, specifications, code sets,
modifiers), and the policies proposed in
the September 23, 2005 proposed rule.
Due to the complexity of this
proposed rule, the length of time
[FR Doc. 05–23113 Filed 11–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
45 CFR Part 162
[CMS–0050–N]
RIN 0938–AK62
HIPAA Administrative Simplification:
Standards for Electronic Health Care
Claims Attachments; Extension of
Comment Period
Notice of extension of comment
period for proposed rule.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice extends the
comment period for a proposed rule
published in the Federal Register on
September 23, 2005 (70 FR 55990) that
would recommend the adoption of a set
of standards to facilitate the electronic
exchange of clinical and administrative
data to further improve the claims
adjudication process when additional
documentation is required. Due to the
very technical nature of this rule, the
industry is asking for additional time to
conduct a more comprehensive and
thorough review in order to provide
comments to the Standards
Development Organizations as well as to
CMS. The comment period is extended
for 60 days.
DATES: The comment period is extended
to 5 p.m. on January 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–0050–P. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (no duplicates, please):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on specific issues
in the September 23, 2005 proposed rule
to https://www.cms.hhs.gov/regulations/
ecomments. (Attachments should be in
Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or Excel;
however, we prefer Microsoft Word.)
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments (one original and two
copies) to the following address ONLY:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Nov 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 22, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70570-70574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23113]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 2930
RIN: 1004-AD68
[WO-250-1220-PA-24 1A]
Permits for Recreation on Public Lands
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would update the regulations of the Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) that tell how to obtain recreation permits for
commercial recreational operations, competitive events and activities,
organized group activities and events, and individual recreational use
of special areas.
The proposed rule is needed to remove from the regulations
inconsistencies with the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act
(REA), which authorizes the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture
to establish, modify, charge, and collect recreation fees at Federal
recreation lands and waters for the next 10 years.
DATES: You should submit your comments by January 23, 2006. BLM will
not necessarily consider comments postmarked or received by messenger
or electronic mail after the above date in the decisionmaking process
on the proposed rule.
ADDRESSES:
Mail: Director (630), Bureau of Land Management, Administrative
Record, Room 401-LS, Eastern States Office, 7450 Boston Boulevard,
Springfield, Virginia 22153.
Personal or messenger delivery: Room 401, 1620 L Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20036.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Internet e-mail: comments_washington@blm.gov. (Include ``Attn:
AD68'').
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee Larson at (202) 452-5168 as to the
substance of the proposed rule, or Ted Hudson at (202) 452-5042 as to
procedural matters. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may contact either individual by calling the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at (800) 877-8339, 24 hours a day, 7
days a week.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Comment Procedures
II. Background
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
IV. Procedural Matters
I. Public Comment Procedures
A. How do I comment on the proposed rule?
If you wish to comment, you may submit your comments by any one of
several methods.
You may mail comments to Director (630), Bureau of Land
Management, Administrative Record, Room 401 LS, Eastern States Office,
7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153.
You may deliver comments to Room 401, 1620 L Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20036.
You may comment on the rule at the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
You may also comment via e-mail to: comments_
washington@blm.gov.
Please make your comments on the proposed rule as specific as
possible, confine them to issues pertinent to the proposed rule, and
explain the reason for any changes you recommend. Where possible, your
comments should reference the specific section or paragraph of the
proposal that you are addressing.
BLM may not necessarily consider or include in the Administrative
Record for the final rule comments that BLM receives after the close of
the comment period (see DATES) or comments delivered to an address
other than those listed above (see ADDRESSES).
B. May I review comments submitted by others?
Comments, including names and street addresses of respondents, will
be available for public review at the address listed under ``ADDRESSES:
Personal or messenger delivery'' during regular business hours (7:45
a.m. to 4:15 p.m.), Monday through Friday, except holidays.
Individual respondents may request confidentiality, which we will
honor to the extent allowable by law. If you wish to withhold your name
or address, except for the city or town, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your comment. We will make all
submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
II. Background
The REA was passed in the 2005 Omnibus Appropriations bill signed
into law on December 8, 2004. The Act provides authority for 10 years
for the Secretaries of the Interior and
[[Page 70571]]
Agriculture to establish, modify, charge, and collect recreation fees
for use of some Federal recreation lands and waters.
Section 13 of REA repealed certain admission and use fee
authorities, including Section 4(a) through (i) of the Land and Water
Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a et seq.), and Section
315 of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 1996 (as contained in section 101(c) of Public Law
104-134; 16 U.S.C. 460l-6a). The latter provision authorized the
Recreational Fee Demonstration Program, which BLM has used to fund many
of our recreation sites. Because these authorities have been repealed,
we need to amend BLM's recreation permit regulations to remove
references to them.
Under REA, BLM will--
Reinvest a majority of fees back to the site of collection
to enhance visitor services and reduce the backlog of maintenance needs
for recreation facilities (including trail maintenance, toilet
facilities, boat ramps, hunting blinds, interpretive signs and
programs);
Participate in an interagency fee program that reduces the
number of national passes from four to one allowing visitors access to
all Federal recreation lands and sites;
Provide more opportunities for public involvement in BLM's
determination of recreation fee sites and fees; and
Provide for cooperation with gateway communities through
fee management agreements for visitor and recreation services,
emergency medical services, and law enforcement services.
BLM does not and will not charge a fee for many recreation
activities and sites on public lands. The REA includes additional
provisions that build on BLM's past experiences in the recreation fee
program and improve the fee program by clarifying the circumstances in
which fees may be charged. Under the Act, BLM will not charge standard
or expanded amenity recreation fees for--
General access to BLM areas;
Horseback riding, walking through, driving through, or
boating through public lands where no facilities or services are used;
Access to overlooks or scenic pullouts;
Undesignated parking areas where no facilities are
provided; or
Picnicking along roads or trails.
In addition, individuals under 16 will not be charged an entrance
or standard amenity fee.
Under the REA, BLM will form and use Recreation Resource Advisory
Committees for BLM sites and areas, or in lieu of a Recreation Resource
Advisory Committee, may use a Resource Advisory Committee under another
provision of law, to give communities additional opportunities to
provide input on the establishment of a specific recreation fee site or
the implementation of a fee, and will provide other opportunities for
notice and public participation before establishing a new fee. We will
also keep the visiting public informed on how we are using fee revenues
to improve visitor facilities and services.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule makes changes in the existing regulations on
permits for recreation on public lands in order to bring them into
conformance with the law, including the REA. This section of the
preamble describes the changes made in each section of the regulations.
Section 2931.3 What are the authorities for these regulations?
The proposed rule would amend this section to remove references to
the repealed authority, portions of the Land and Water Conservation
Fund Act, 16 U.S.C. 460l-6a, and add reference to the REA. It explains
that the REA authorizes BLM to collect fees for recreational use of
certain kinds of areas, and to issue special recreation permits for
group activities, such as commercial outings, and recreation events,
such as races or traditional assemblies. The rule also clarifies the
authority contained in Section 303 of the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. 1733. It also restates the functions
of 18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 et seq., that they establish penalties of
fines and imprisonment for violation of regulations. Finally, in this
section, the rule removes paragraph (b) discussing 36 CFR part 71,
because the regulations there are outdated.
Section 2932.57 Prohibited acts and penalties.
In this section, which covers prohibited acts and penalties related
to special recreation permits, the proposed rule would amend paragraph
(b)(3) by removing reference to the Land and Water Conservation Fund
Act and adding the REA in its place.
Section 12(d) of the REA establishes limits on penalties for
failure to pay recreation fees established under the Act. It provides
for such failures to be punishable as Class A or Class B misdemeanors,
but limits fines for a first offense to $100. (Under 18 U.S.C. 3571 and
3581, a Class A misdemeanor is subject to a penalty of not more than
$100,000 for an individual ($200,000 for an organization) or one year
in jail. A Class B misdemeanor is subject to a fine of not more than
$5,000 for an individual ($10,000 for an organization) or six months in
jail.) We have also revised paragraph (b) of section 2932.57 to reflect
this provision of the REA.
Section 2933.33 Prohibited acts and penalties.
The proposed rule would amend this section, which states
prohibitions and imposes penalties related to recreation use permits,
by removing references to the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act, and
substituting REA, where appropriate. To conform the prohibited acts in
paragraph (a) of the section with the table of penalties in paragraph
(d), we have added a provision to paragraph (a) requiring compliance
with recreation use permit stipulations and conditions. The proposed
rule would also remove unnecessary internal cross-references in this
section, and correct inaccurate legal citations.
IV. Procedural Matters
Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866)
This document is not a significant rule and was not subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of $100 million or more on
the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or state, local, or tribal governments or
communities.
(2) This rule will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency. The rule
implements a new statute that affects all land managing agencies. The
other agencies are cooperating with BLM in developing general
guidelines for implementing the statute.
(3) This rule does not alter the budgetary effects or entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or obligations of
their recipients. It maintains current policies on user fees.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal or policy issues. It cites
new statutory authority that does not have substantially different
effects on the program or the public.
During fiscal year 2004, BLM issued just over 109,000 Special
Recreation Permits of all kinds, with revenues totaling a little over
$8 million deposited into the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF),
the Fee Demonstration Project, and other
[[Page 70572]]
miscellaneous accounts. These numbers are derived from the Public Land
Statistics, and represent an increase of slightly more than fivefold
since 1996. On the other hand, according to the American Recreation
Coalition, Americans spent more than $108 billion on wildlife-related
recreation (fishing, hunting, birdwatching, and so forth) alone. We
give these numbers to illustrate that the fees charged under BLM's
recreation program are minuscule compared with those realized by the
overall national recreation industry. Special Recreation Permits are
generally obtained by commercial outfitters and guides, river running
companies, sponsors of competitive events, ``snow bird'' seasonal
mobile home campers who use BLM's long-term visitor areas, and private
individuals and groups using certain special areas. Under current
regulations, use fees are established by the BLM Director, who may
adjust them from time to time to reflect changes in costs and the
market, and published periodically in the Federal Register. BLM may
charge actual costs, subject to certain limitations. During fiscal year
2004, BLM issued just over 655,000 Recreation Use Permits for use of
fee sites, with revenues totaling a little over $5,200,000. We state
these figures to give some idea of the scope of the BLM recreation
program in economic terms, and to show that the revenues from the
program do not approach $100 million annually. The REA makes changes in
the authorities for BLM's recreation fees, but Section 3 of the Act
does not change the policy for setting those fees: ``The amount of the
recreation fee shall be commensurate with the benefits and services
provided to the visitor,'' and ``[t]he Secretary shall consider
comparable fees charged elsewhere and by other public agencies and by
nearby private sector operators.'' Thus, it is clear that the changes
in the proposed rule will not have economic effects exceeding $100
million annually.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of
small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). BLM recognizes that most commercial recreation enterprises--
outfitters, guides, river-running companies, local retail outlets--are
small businesses, and that over 5,000 of them annually hold BLM
commercial or competitive permits. Nevertheless, this proposed rule
does not change permit fees, but rather updates the regulations to
reflect changes in authorities for the fees and changes their
allocation. Penalties for non-payment of fees would not affect
outfitters, event organizers, and other commercial permittees, who must
pay the fees before receiving permits.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more. See the discussion under Regulatory Planning and
Review, above.
Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. The rule will have no effect on the 3
percent basic use fee that BLM s fee schedule (set by the 1984 policy,
not regulations) requires outfitters to pay.
Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. The
changes in the regulations required by enactment of the REA will not
lead to increases in user fees or any other cost factors that would
impel recreationists to travel to comparable foreign recreation
destinations.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on state, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on state,
local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. The rule has no
effect on governmental or Tribal entities. A statement containing the
information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.) is not required.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, BLM finds that the rule
does not have significant takings implications. The proposed rule does
not provide for forfeiture or derogation of private property rights. It
merely updates the regulations to reflect changes in statutory
authorities for the BLM recreation program covered by the regulations.
A takings implications assessment is not required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, BLM finds that the rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The rule does not
have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship
between the national government and the states, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
The rule does not preempt state law.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Office of the
Solicitor has determined that this rule does not unduly burden the
judicial system and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments.
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have found that this
final rule does not include policies that have Tribal implications. The
rule has no effect on Tribal lands, and affect member of Tribes only to
the extent that they use public lands and facilities for recreation.
The rule merely updates the regulations to reflect changes in statutory
authorities.
E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not a significant energy action. It will not have an
adverse effect on energy supplies. The rule does not limit land use by
energy companies. It applies only to permits for recreational use of
public lands, how BLM collects revenues and applies them to the
program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These regulations do not contain information collection
requirements that the Office of Management and Budget must approve
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
National Environmental Policy Act
BLM has determined that this proposed rule updating the recreation
permit regulations to recognize and reflect changes in statutory
authorities governing the payment and allocation of permit fees and the
penalties for nonpayment is a regulation of an administrative,
financial, legal, and procedural nature. Therefore, it is categorically
excluded from environmental review under section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act, pursuant to 516 Departmental Manual
(DM), Chapter 2, Appendix 1. In addition, the proposed
[[Page 70573]]
rule does not meet any of the 10 criteria for exceptions to categorical
exclusions listed in 516 DM, Chapter 2, Appendix 2. Pursuant to Council
on Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR 1508.4) and the
environmental policies and procedures of the Department of the
Interior, the term ``categorical exclusions'' means a category of
actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment and that have been found to have no
such effect in procedures adopted by a Federal agency and for which
neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact
statement is required. Therefore, a detailed statement under the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 is not required.
Author
The principal author of this proposed rule is Lee Larson of the
Recreation Group, Washington Office, BLM, assisted by Ted Hudson of the
Regulatory Affairs Group, Washington Office, BLM.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 2930
Penalties; Public lands; Recreation and recreation areas; Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements; Surety bonds.
For the reasons explained in the preamble, and under the authority
of 43 U.S.C. 1740, we propose to amend chapter II, subtitle B of title
43 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
Dated: October 24, 2005.
Chad Calvert,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Land and Minerals
Management.
PART 2930--PERMITS FOR RECREATION ON PUBLIC LANDS
1. The authority citation for part 2930 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1740; 16 U.S.C. 6802.
Subpart 2931--Permits for Recreation; General
2. Revise section 2931.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 2931.3 What are the authorities for these regulations?
The statutory authorities underlying the regulations in this part
are the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.,
and the Federal Land Recreation Enhancement Act, 16 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.
(a) The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) contains the
Bureau of Land Management's (BLM's) general land use management
authority over the public lands, and establishes outdoor recreation as
one of the principal uses of those lands (43 U.S.C. 1701(a)(8)).
Section 302(b) of FLPMA directs the Secretary of the Interior to
regulate through permits or other instruments the use of the public
lands, which includes commercial recreation use. Section 303 of FLPMA
authorizes BLM to promulgate and enforce regulations, and establishes
the penalties for violations of the regulations.
(b) The Federal Land Recreation Enhancement Act (REA) authorizes
BLM to collect fees for recreational use in areas meeting certain
criteria (16 U.S.C. 6802(f) and (g)(2)), and to issue special
recreation permits for group activities and recreation events (16
U.S.C. 6802(h).
(c) 18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 et seq. establish sentences of fines
and imprisonment for violation of regulations.
Subpart 2932--Special Recreation Permits for Commercial Use,
Competitive Events, Organized Groups, and Recreation Use in Special
Areas [Amended]
3. Amend section 2932.57 by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 2932.57 Prohibited acts and penalties.
* * * * *
(b) Penalties. (1) If you are convicted of any act prohibited by
paragraphs (a)(2)-(a)(7) of this section, you may be subject to a
sentence of a fine or imprisonment or both for a Class A misdemeanor in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 et seq. under the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a)).
(2) If you are convicted of any act prohibited by paragraph (a)(1)
of this section, you may be subject to a sentence of a fine not to
exceed $100 for the first offense, or a sentence of a fine and or
imprisonment for a Class A or B misdemeanor in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 et seq. for all subsequent offenses.
(3) You may also be subject to civil action for unauthorized use of
the public lands or related waters and their resources, for violations
of permit terms, conditions, or stipulations, or for uses beyond those
allowed by permit.
Subpart 2933--Recreation Use Permits for Fee Areas
4. Amend section 2933.33 by revising paragraphs (a), (b), and (d)
to read as follows:
Sec. 2933.33 Prohibited acts and penalties.
(a) Prohibited acts. You must not--
(1) Fail to obtain a use permit or pay any fees required by this
subpart;
(2) Violate the stipulations or conditions of a permit issued under
this subpart;
(3) Fail to pay any fees within the time specified;
(4) Fail to display any required proof of payment of fees;
(5) Willfully and knowingly possess, use, publish as true, or sell
to another, any forged, counterfeited, or altered document or
instrument used as proof of or exemption from fee payment;
(6) Willfully and knowingly use any document or instrument used as
proof of or exemption from fee payment, that BLM issued to or intended
another to use; or
(7) Falsely represent yourself to be a person to whom BLM has
issued a document or instrument used as proof of or exemption from fee
payment.
(b) Evidence of nonpayment. BLM will consider failure to display
proof of payment on your unattended vehicle parked within a fee area,
where payment is required to be prima facie evidence of nonpayment.
* * * * *
(d) Types of penalties. You may be subject to the following fines
or penalties for violating the provisions of this subpart:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are convicted of * * then you may be
* subject to * * * under * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Any act prohibited by A sentence of a fine The Federal Land
paragraph (a)(4), (5), or and/or imprisonment Policy and
(6) of this section. for a Class A Management Act of
misdemeanor in 1976 (43 U.S.C.
accordance with 18 1733(a)).
U.S.C. 3571 and
3581 et seq.
(2) Violating any regulation A sentence of a fine The Federal Land
in this subpart or any and/or imprisonment Policy and
condition of a Recreation for a Class A Management Act of
Use Permit. misdemeanor in 1976 (43 U.S.C.
accordance with 18 1733(a)).
U.S.C. 3571 and
3581 et seq.
[[Page 70574]]
(3) Any act prohibited by A fine not to exceed The Federal Lands
paragraph (a)(1), (2), or $100 for the first Recreation
(3) of this section. offense, or a Enhancement Act (16
sentence of a fine U.S.C. 6811).
and/or imprisonment
for a Class A or B
misdemeanor in
accordance with 18
U.S.C. 3571 and
3581 et seq. for
all subsequent
offenses.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 05-23113 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P