Draft Document Reassessing Methods To Estimate Population Size and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) Population, 70632-70633 [05-23057]

Download as PDF 70632 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 22, 2005 / Notices (2) Title of the Form/Collection: USCIS Case Status Service Online. (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Homeland Security sponsoring the collection: No Agency Form No. (File No. OMB–33). U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Individuals or households. This system allows individuals or their representatives to request case status of their pending application through the USCIS website. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: 24,000,000 respondents at 2.75 minutes (.046) per response. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: 1,104,000 annual burden hours. If you have additional comments, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions, or additional information, please visit the USCIS Web site at: https://uscis.gov/ graphics/formsfee/forms/pra/index.htm. If additional information is required contact: USCIS Regulatory Management Division, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20529, (202) 272–8377. Dated: November 17, 2005. Richard A. Sloan, Director, Regulatory Management Division, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. [FR Doc. 05–23060 Filed 11–21–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–10–M DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Draft Document Reassessing Methods To Estimate Population Size and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) Population Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of document availability; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces the availability for public review of the draft document Reassessing Methods to Estimate Population Size and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear. Once comments are received, analyzed, and addressed, the final revised population methodology will be appended to the Grizzly Bear VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:49 Nov 21, 2005 Jkt 208001 Recovery Plan and the Final Conservation Strategy for the Grizzly Bear in the Greater Yellowstone Area. The Service solicits review and comment from the public on this draft information prior to appending it to the Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan. DATES: Comments on the draft document Reassessing Methods to Estimate Population Size and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear must be received on or before February 21, 2006 to ensure that they will be received in time for our consideration prior to finalization of the revised methodology. ADDRESSES: Written comments and materials regarding this information should be sent to the Recovery Coordinator, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, University Hall, Room 309, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812. Comments and materials received are available on request for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the above address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Christopher Servheen, Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator (see ADDRESSES above), at telephone (406) 243–4903. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Document Availability Persons wishing to review this document may obtain a copy by contacting the Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator, at the above address, contacting the above official by telephone, or by viewing it online at https://mountain-prairie.fws.gov/species/ mammals/grizzly/yellowstone.htm. You also may make an appointment to view the documents at the above address during normal business hours. Background Restoring an endangered or threatened animal or plant to the point where it is again a secure, selfsustaining member of its ecosystem is a primary goal of the Service’s endangered species program. To help guide the recovery effort, the Service prepares recovery plans for most of the listed species native to the United States. Recovery plans describe actions considered necessary for conservation of the species; establish criteria for recovery levels for downlisting or delisting them, and estimate time and cost for implementing the recovery measures needed. Under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the Service approved the revised Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan on September 10, 1993. PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 In 1994, The Fund for Animals, Inc., and 42 other organizations and individuals filed suit over the adequacy of the 1993 Recovery Plan (Fund for Animals v. Babbitt, 903 F. Supp. 96 (D. D.C. 1995); 967 F. Supp. 6 (D. D.C. 1997). In 1995, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order which remanded for further study and clarification four issues that are relevant to the Yellowstone grizzly bear population, including—(1) The methods used to measure the status of bear populations; (2) the impacts of genetic isolation; (3) how mortalities related to livestock are monitored; and (4) the monitoring of disease. The Service also agreed to append habitat-based recovery criteria to the Recovery Plan prior to any delisting action. All of these issues, except the draft revised methodology for calculating total population size and establishing sustainable mortality limits for the Yellowstone grizzly bear population, have been addressed prior to publication of this Notice and were made available for public review and comment previously (62 FR 19777, April 23, 1997; 62 FR 47677, September 10, 1997; 64 FR 38464, July 16, 1999; 64 FR 38465, July 16, 1999). As recommended by Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan Task Y11 and as per the Court Opinion, the Service has worked to ‘‘determine population conditions at which the species is viable and self sustaining’’ and ‘‘reevaluate and refine population criteria as new information becomes available’’ for the Yellowstone population of grizzly bears (Service 1993 p. 44). At the request of the Service beginning in 2000, the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team (IGBST), led by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with various University specialists, began a comprehensive evaluation of the demographic data and the methodology used to estimate population size and establish the sustainable level of mortality for grizzly bears in the Yellowstone Ecosystem. Accordingly, the IGBST (2005) produced a critical review of the current methods for estimating population size and calculating the sustainable mortality levels for the Yellowstone grizzly population. This product is a report compiled by the IGBST that evaluates current methods, reviews recent scientific literature, examines alternative methods, and recommends the most valid technique based on the best available science (IGBST 2005). The end result of this review is the draft document Reassessing Methods to Estimate Population Size and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear. E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM 22NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 22, 2005 / Notices The method for calculating population size using females with cubs sightings (Keating et al. 2002) and the method for calculating the unknown and unreported mortalities (Cherry et al. 2002) have been published in peerreviewed scientific journals. We are seeking comments only on the document Reassessing Methods to Estimate Population Size and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear, which applies these peer-reviewed methods to the Yellowstone grizzly bear population. Based on the comments received, the Service will finalize this methodology for calculating total population size and establishing sustainable mortality limits for the Yellowstone grizzly bear population and append it to the Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan prior to publishing a final rule to designate the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of grizzly bears as a distinct population segment and to remove the Yellowstone distinct population segment of grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife. Public Comments Solicited Section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, as amended in 1988, requires that public notice and an opportunity for public review and comment be provided during recovery plan development. We consider all information presented during a public comment period prior to approval of each new or revised recovery plan. We and other Federal management agencies also will take these comments into account in the course of implementing approved recovery plans. We now seek public comment on the draft document Reassessing Methods to Estimate Population Size and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear to address both Task Y11 in the Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan and the Court Opinion (Fund for Animals v. Babbitt, 903 F. Supp. 96 (D. D.C. 1995); 967 F. Supp. 6 (D. D.C. 1997)). All comments received by the date specified in the DATES section above will be considered prior to finalization of the information. Appropriate portions of the information will be appended to, and become part of, the 1993 Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan and the Final Conservation Strategy for the Grizzly Bear in the Greater Yellowstone Area. Literature Cited Cherry, S., M.A. Haroldson, J. Robison-Cox, and C.C. Schwartz. 2002. Estimating total human-caused mortality from reported mortality using data from radioinstrumented grizzly bears. Ursus 13:175–184. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:22 Nov 21, 2005 Jkt 208001 Keating, K.A., C.C. Schwartz, M.A. Haroldson, and D. Moody. 2002. Estimating numbers of females with cubs-of-the-year in the Yellowstone grizzly bear population. Ursus 13:161– 174. Authority: The authority for this Notice is under section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f). Dated: July 11, 2005. Ralph O. Morgenweck, Regional Director, Denver, Colorado. [FR Doc. 05–23057 Filed 11–21–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Minerals Management Service Preparation of an Environmental Assessment for Proposed Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sale 200 in the Western Gulf of Mexico (2006) Minerals Management Service, Interior. ACTION: Preparation of an environmental assessment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Minerals Management Service (MMS) is issuing this notice to advise the public, pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., that MMS intends to prepare an environmental assessment (EA) for proposed Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) oil and gas Lease Sale 200 in the Western Gulf of Mexico (GOM) (Lease Sale 200) scheduled for August 2006. The MMS is issuing this notice to facilitate public involvement. The preparation of this EA is an important step in the decision process for Lease Sale 200. The proposal and alternatives for Lease Sale 200 were identified by the MMS Director in January 2002 following the Call for Information and Nominations/Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and were analyzed in the Gulf of Mexico OCS Oil and Gas Lease Sales: 2003–2007; Central Planning Area Sales 185, 190, 194, 198, and 201; Western Planning Area Sales 187, 192, 196, and 200—Final Environmental Impact Statement; Volumes I and II (Multisale EIS, OCS EIS/EA MMS 2002–052). This EA will reexamine the potential environmental effects of the proposed action (the offering of all available unleased acreage in the Western Planning Area (WPA)) and its alternatives (the proposed action excluding the unleased blocks near biologically sensitive topographic features; and no action) based on any new information regarding potential PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 70633 impacts and issues that were not available at the time the Multisale EIS was prepared. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Dennis Chew, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, MS 5410, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123– 2394. You may also contact Mr. Chew by telephone at (504) 736–2793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In November 2002, MMS prepared a Multisale EIS that addressed nine proposed Federal actions that offer for lease areas on the GOM OCS that may contain economically recoverable oil and gas resources. Federal regulations allow for several related or similar proposals to be analyzed in one EIS (40 CFR 1502.4). Since each proposed lease sale and its projected activities are very similar each year for each planning area, a single EIS was prepared for the nine Central Planning Area (CPA) and WPA lease sales scheduled in the OCS Oil and Gas Leasing Program: 2002–2007 (5Year Program, OCS EIS/EA MMS 2002– 006). Under the current 5-Year Program, five annual areawide lease sales were scheduled for the CPA (Lease Sales 185, 190, 194, 198, and 201) and five annual areawide lease sales were scheduled for the WPA (Lease Sales 184, 187, 192, 196, and 200). Lease Sale 184 was not addressed in the Multisale EIS; a separate EA was prepared for that proposal. The Multisale EIS addressed CPA Lease Sales 185, 190, 194, 198, and 201 scheduled for 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively, and WPA Lease Sales 187, 192, 196, and 200 scheduled for 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively. Although the Multisale EIS addresses nine proposed lease sales, decisions were made only for proposed CPA Lease Sale 185 and proposed WPA Lease Sale 187 based on the EIS. For the subsequent sales, an additional NEPA review (an EA) will be conducted the year prior to each proposed lease sale, to address any new information relevant to that proposed action. After completion of the EA, MMS will determine whether to prepare a Finding of No New Significant Impact (FONNSI) or a Supplemental EIS. The MMS will then prepare and send Consistency Determinations (CD’s) to the affected States to determine whether the lease sale is consistent with their federally-approved State coastal zone management programs. Finally, MMS will solicit comments via the Proposed Notice of Sale (PNOS) from the governors of the affected States on the size, timing, and location of the lease sale. The tentative schedule for the prelease decision process for Lease Sale E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM 22NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70632-70633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23057]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Draft Document Reassessing Methods To Estimate Population Size 
and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear 
(Ursus arctos horribilis) Population

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of document availability; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces the 
availability for public review of the draft document Reassessing 
Methods to Estimate Population Size and Sustainable Mortality Limits 
for the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear. Once comments are received, analyzed, 
and addressed, the final revised population methodology will be 
appended to the Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan and the Final Conservation 
Strategy for the Grizzly Bear in the Greater Yellowstone Area. The 
Service solicits review and comment from the public on this draft 
information prior to appending it to the Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan.

DATES: Comments on the draft document Reassessing Methods to Estimate 
Population Size and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the Yellowstone 
Grizzly Bear must be received on or before February 21, 2006 to ensure 
that they will be received in time for our consideration prior to 
finalization of the revised methodology.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and materials regarding this information 
should be sent to the Recovery Coordinator, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, University Hall, Room 309, University of Montana, Missoula, 
Montana 59812. Comments and materials received are available on request 
for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at 
the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Christopher Servheen, Grizzly Bear 
Recovery Coordinator (see ADDRESSES above), at telephone (406) 243-
4903.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Document Availability

    Persons wishing to review this document may obtain a copy by 
contacting the Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator, at the above address, 
contacting the above official by telephone, or by viewing it online at 
https://mountain-prairie.fws.gov/species/mammals/grizzly/
yellowstone.htm. You also may make an appointment to view the documents 
at the above address during normal business hours.

Background

    Restoring an endangered or threatened animal or plant to the point 
where it is again a secure, self-sustaining member of its ecosystem is 
a primary goal of the Service's endangered species program. To help 
guide the recovery effort, the Service prepares recovery plans for most 
of the listed species native to the United States. Recovery plans 
describe actions considered necessary for conservation of the species; 
establish criteria for recovery levels for downlisting or delisting 
them, and estimate time and cost for implementing the recovery measures 
needed. Under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the Service approved the revised 
Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan on September 10, 1993.
    In 1994, The Fund for Animals, Inc., and 42 other organizations and 
individuals filed suit over the adequacy of the 1993 Recovery Plan 
(Fund for Animals v. Babbitt, 903 F. Supp. 96 (D. D.C. 1995); 967 F. 
Supp. 6 (D. D.C. 1997). In 1995, the U.S. District Court for the 
District of Columbia issued an order which remanded for further study 
and clarification four issues that are relevant to the Yellowstone 
grizzly bear population, including--(1) The methods used to measure the 
status of bear populations; (2) the impacts of genetic isolation; (3) 
how mortalities related to livestock are monitored; and (4) the 
monitoring of disease. The Service also agreed to append habitat-based 
recovery criteria to the Recovery Plan prior to any delisting action. 
All of these issues, except the draft revised methodology for 
calculating total population size and establishing sustainable 
mortality limits for the Yellowstone grizzly bear population, have been 
addressed prior to publication of this Notice and were made available 
for public review and comment previously (62 FR 19777, April 23, 1997; 
62 FR 47677, September 10, 1997; 64 FR 38464, July 16, 1999; 64 FR 
38465, July 16, 1999).
    As recommended by Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan Task Y11 and as per 
the Court Opinion, the Service has worked to ``determine population 
conditions at which the species is viable and self sustaining'' and 
``reevaluate and refine population criteria as new information becomes 
available'' for the Yellowstone population of grizzly bears (Service 
1993 p. 44). At the request of the Service beginning in 2000, the 
Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team (IGBST), led by the U.S. Geological 
Survey in cooperation with various University specialists, began a 
comprehensive evaluation of the demographic data and the methodology 
used to estimate population size and establish the sustainable level of 
mortality for grizzly bears in the Yellowstone Ecosystem. Accordingly, 
the IGBST (2005) produced a critical review of the current methods for 
estimating population size and calculating the sustainable mortality 
levels for the Yellowstone grizzly population. This product is a report 
compiled by the IGBST that evaluates current methods, reviews recent 
scientific literature, examines alternative methods, and recommends the 
most valid technique based on the best available science (IGBST 2005). 
The end result of this review is the draft document Reassessing Methods 
to Estimate Population Size and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the 
Yellowstone Grizzly Bear.

[[Page 70633]]

    The method for calculating population size using females with cubs 
sightings (Keating et al. 2002) and the method for calculating the 
unknown and unreported mortalities (Cherry et al. 2002) have been 
published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. We are seeking comments 
only on the document Reassessing Methods to Estimate Population Size 
and Sustainable Mortality Limits for the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear, 
which applies these peer-reviewed methods to the Yellowstone grizzly 
bear population.
    Based on the comments received, the Service will finalize this 
methodology for calculating total population size and establishing 
sustainable mortality limits for the Yellowstone grizzly bear 
population and append it to the Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan prior to 
publishing a final rule to designate the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem 
population of grizzly bears as a distinct population segment and to 
remove the Yellowstone distinct population segment of grizzly bears 
from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife.

Public Comments Solicited

    Section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, as amended in 1988, 
requires that public notice and an opportunity for public review and 
comment be provided during recovery plan development. We consider all 
information presented during a public comment period prior to approval 
of each new or revised recovery plan. We and other Federal management 
agencies also will take these comments into account in the course of 
implementing approved recovery plans. We now seek public comment on the 
draft document Reassessing Methods to Estimate Population Size and 
Sustainable Mortality Limits for the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear to 
address both Task Y11 in the Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan and the Court 
Opinion (Fund for Animals v. Babbitt, 903 F. Supp. 96 (D. D.C. 1995); 
967 F. Supp. 6 (D. D.C. 1997)). All comments received by the date 
specified in the DATES section above will be considered prior to 
finalization of the information. Appropriate portions of the 
information will be appended to, and become part of, the 1993 Grizzly 
Bear Recovery Plan and the Final Conservation Strategy for the Grizzly 
Bear in the Greater Yellowstone Area.

Literature Cited

Cherry, S., M.A. Haroldson, J. Robison-Cox, and C.C. Schwartz. 2002. 
Estimating total human-caused mortality from reported mortality 
using data from radio-instrumented grizzly bears. Ursus 13:175-184.
Keating, K.A., C.C. Schwartz, M.A. Haroldson, and D. Moody. 2002. 
Estimating numbers of females with cubs-of-the-year in the 
Yellowstone grizzly bear population. Ursus 13:161-174.

    Authority: The authority for this Notice is under section 4(f) 
of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).

    Dated: July 11, 2005.
Ralph O. Morgenweck,
Regional Director, Denver, Colorado.
[FR Doc. 05-23057 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.