Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Maintenance Dredging Around Pier 39, San Francisco, California, 69955-69959 [05-22861]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2005 / Notices
voting, ex officio members. Since its
establishment, the advisory council has
played a vital role in advising the
sanctuary and NOAA on critical issues.
In addition to providing advice on
management issues facing the
Sanctuary, the Council members serve
as a communication bridge between
constituents and the Sanctuary staff.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Availability of Seats for the Olympic
Coast National Marine Sanctuary
Advisory Council
National Marine Sanctuary
Program (NMSP), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice and request for
applications.
AGENCY:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. Sections 1431, et seq.
(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog
Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary Program)
SUMMARY: The Olympic Coast National
Marine Sanctuary (OCNMS or
Sanctuary) is seeking applicants for the
following vacant seats on its Sanctuary
Advisory Council (Council):
Conservation/Environmental, Marine
Business/Ports/Industry, and Research.
Applicants are chosen based upon their
particular expertise and experience in
relation to the seat for which they are
applying; community and professional
affiliations; philosophy regarding the
protection and management of marine
resources; and possibly the length of
residence in the area affected by the
Sanctuary. Applicants who are chosen
as members or alternates should expect
to serve 3-year terms, pursuant to the
Council’s Charter.
DATES: Applications are due by
December 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Application kits may be
obtained from Andrew Palmer,
Advisory Council Coordinator, 115 East
Railroad Ave., Suite 301, Port Angeles,
WA 98362. Completed applications
should be sent to the same address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Palmer, Advisory Council
Coordinator, 115 East Railroad Ave.,
Suite 301, Port Angeles, WA 98362,
(360) 457–6622 extension 15, e-mail
andrew.palmer@noaa.gov.
Sanctuary
Advisory Council members and
alternatives serve three-year terms. The
Advisory Council meets bi-monthly in
public sessions in communities in and
around the Olympic Coast National
Marine Sanctuary.
The Olympic Coast National Marine
Sanctuary Advisory Council was
established in December 1998 to assure
continued public participation in the
management of the sanctuary. Serving
in a volunteer capacity, the advisory
council’s 15 voting members represent a
variety of local user groups, as well as
the general public. In addition, five
Federal government agencies and one
federally funded program serve as non-
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Nov 17, 2005
Jkt 208001
Dated: November 10, 2005.
Daniel J. Basta,
Director, National Marine Sanctuary Program,
National Ocean Service, National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–22860 Filed 11–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 052405C]
Small Takes of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Specified Activities;
Maintenance Dredging Around Pier 39,
San Francisco, California
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of incidental
harassment authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
provisions of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA) as amended,
notification is hereby given that NMFS
has issued an Incidental Harassment
Authorization (IHA) to Bay Marina
Management Incorporated (BMMI) to
take marine mammals by Level B
harassment incidental to dredging on
the west side of the Pier 39 Marina on
the San Francisco waterfront, CA.
DATES: Effective from October 17, 2005,
through October 16, 2006.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the IHA and the
application are available by writing to
Steve Leathery, Chief, Permits,
Conservation, and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225, or by telephoning the
contact listed here. A copy of the
application containing a list of
references used in this document may
be obtained by writing to this address,
by telephoning the contact listed here
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT)
or online at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
prot_res/PR2/Small_Take/
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69955
smalltake_info.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular
business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolie
Harrison, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext 166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
may be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have no more than a
negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of the
species or stock(s) for subsistence uses,
and that the permissible methods of
taking and requirements pertaining to
the monitoring and reporting of such
taking are set forth.
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected
to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.
Subsection 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
for certain categories of activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[‘‘Level A harassment’’]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[‘‘Level B harassment’’].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorization for the
incidental harassment of small numbers
of marine mammals. Within 45 days of
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
69956
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2005 / Notices
the close of the comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny issuance of
the authorization.
Summary of Request
On August 9, 2004, NMFS received an
application from BMMI requesting an
IHA for the take, by harassment, of
small numbers of California sea lions
(Zalophus californianus) and Pacific
harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) incidental
to the maintenance dredging the I, J, and
K Docks on the west side of Pier 39
Marina on the San Francisco waterfront,
California.
Description of the Activity
BMMI will perform maintenance
dredging using a small, self-contained
clamshell-style crane barge between
docks I, J, and K at the Pier 39 west
marina. These maintenance measures
are necessary to maintain safe
navigation depths at the marina, which
currently has reduced water depths
attributed to the accretion of bay
sediment. The dredging at Pier 39 will
remove sediment to create water depths
in the project area of 9 ft (2.7 m) Mean
Lower Low Water (MLLW), plus an
additional two-foot overdredge
allowance. Dredging design area limits
(footprints) include the faces,
approaches, and entrance channels to
each berthing area up to the limit of the
adjacent pier. Dredging will occur
between June 1 and November 30 to
avoid impacts to steelhead trout and
chinook salmon.
Dredging operations at the Pier 39
west marina will occur in late fall of
2005 or the summer of 2006 and are
expected to take approximately one to
two weeks to complete. Dredge
machinery will operate from 8 a.m. to
3:30 p.m. daily. Approximately 13,000
yd3 (9,939 m3) of material will be
removed. Dredged material will be
tested for pollutants and toxins by the
Dredge Material Management Office
prior to approval to begin dredging, and
dredged materials will be deposited in
accordance with local, state and Federal
regulations. Once removed, the dredged
material will be transferred to Piers 96/
98, which are owned and operated by
the Port of San Francisco, and from
there it will be disposed of at an
approved upland disposal site.
The proposed dredging of the Pier 39
west berthing area will focus on the
channels and slips of I and J docks and
half of the channel between J and K
docks. The original K dock was
destroyed by the combined weight of
hundreds of California sea lions that
frequently use the area as a haul-out.
Pier 39 replaced the damaged dock with
a number of ten by twelve-foot floats for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Nov 17, 2005
Jkt 208001
the sea lions to use. Since there are no
actual berthing sites at K dock, no
dredging will be necessary in the area
immediately surrounding or under K
dock. The crane barge will be situated
at the furthest distance possible from K
dock during each dredging episode. The
closest that the barge will be to the K
dock haul-out is when dredging the
channel between J and K docks. When
the barge is dredging this channel it will
be moored to the bayside of J dock and
extend the clamshell dredge arm out
into the channel, towards K dock. Since
the distance between J and K docks is
100 ft (30 m) and the barge is 30 ft (9
m) wide, it will never be positioned
closer than 50 ft (15 m) to K dock at any
time during the dredging project.
Comments and Responses
A notice of receipt of the BMMI
application and proposed IHA was
published in the Federal Register on
September 6, 2005 (70 FR 52990). The
Federal Register notice also invited
comments on NMFS’s associated draft
Environmental Assessment (EA), which
was posted on the NMFS website.
During the comment period, NMFS
received one comment from the Marine
Mammal Commission (MMC).
Comment: The MMC recommended
that the requested authorization be
issued, provided that the mitigation and
monitoring activities proposed in the
application and NMFS’s Federal
Register notice are carried out as
described.
Response: The mitigation and
monitoring activities described in the
application and the Federal Register
notice have been incorporated into the
requirements of the IHA.
Description of Habitat and Marine
Mammals Affected by the Activity
The marine mammal species known
to be present at the Pier 39 Marina area
are the California sea lion (Zalophus
californianus) and the Pacific harbor
seal (Phoca vitulina). Since 1993, a
single adult male Steller sea lion
(Eumetopias jubatus) has been observed
hauled out on K dock intermittently
during the months of July and August,
and occasionally in September (30
sightings in the last 10 years). However,
this project will not affect the Steller sea
lion because dredging activities will be
halted if a Steller sea lion is observed.
Additional information on these
species can be found in Marine Mammal
Stock Assessment Reports, which are
available online at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/PR2/
Stock_Assessment_Program/sars.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
California Sea Lions
California sea lions range from
southern Mexico to southwestern
Canada. In the United States, they breed
during July after pupping in late May to
June, primarily in the Channel Islands
of California. Most individuals breed on
the Channel Islands off southern
California and off Baja and mainland
Mexico, although a few pups have been
born on Ano Nuevo Island and this year
a pup was born on the docks at
Monterey and subsequently transferred
to Ano Nuevo Island with its mother.
Following the breeding season on the
Channel Islands, most adult and subadult males migrate northward to
central and northern California and to
the Pacific Northwest, while most
females and young animals either
remain on or near the breeding grounds
throughout the year or move southward
or northward, as far as Monterey Bay.
Since nearing extinction in the early
1900’s, the California sea lion
population has increased and is now
growing at a rate of 5.4 to 6.1 percent
per year (based on pup counts) with an
estimated minimum population of
138,881 animals. Actual population
numbers may be as high as 237,000 to
244,000 animals. The population is not
listed as ‘‘endangered’’ or ‘‘threatened’’
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA), nor is this species listed as
‘‘depleted’’ or as a ‘‘strategic stock’’
under the MMPA.
California sea lions first appeared at
Pier 39 in September, 1989. Numbers of
hauled-out sea lions were relatively low
the first year and K Dock was only used
as a haul out from late summer through
the winter. Within a few years, larger
numbers of sea lions were observed at
K Dock and they began using the haulout throughout the year. The Marine
Mammal Center (MMC) began
monitoring California sea lions at Pier
39 in the late 1990’s and counts indicate
peak usage of K dock at Pier 39 in May
and early June, just prior to the breeding
season. Although numbers decrease
during mid-summer (when most adults
relocate to the rookeries for pupping
and breeding) some sea lions of all age
classes remain in the area and continue
to haul out at Pier 39. Within the
dredging work window (June 1 to
November 30) the largest numbers of
California sea lions are found at K Dock
in the late summer and fall. The highest
number of individuals ever observed at
once between June 1 and November 30
at Pier 39 to date was 1244, in August
of 2003. If the number of individuals
observed at one count is averaged by
month, from June to November, since
2000, the averages range from 169 for
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2005 / Notices
July to 709 in September. Since
monitoring began in 1991, only 10
California sea lion pups have been
observed at Pier 39, in 1997 and 1998.
These pups, which were all weaned,
most likely hauled out at K Dock due to
El Nino, and pups are not expected at
the project site in ‘‘normal’’ years.
Pacific Harbor Seals
Although not commonly observed at
Pier 39, Pacific harbor seals have been
documented as visitors to K dock
numerous times in the past decade.
Harbor seals range from Baja California
in Mexico northward to the Aleutian
Islands of Alaska. The population
estimate for the California stock is
27,863 individuals (Caretta et al., 2004)
and is relatively stable.
Harbor seals inhabit coastal waters
within their range and prefer sheltered
bays and inlets to the exposed coastline.
Daily haul-out behavior of harbor seals
is typically dependent on the tides,
weather and time of day. Harbor seals
exhibit seasonal variation in
reproductive timing depending on
geography. The pupping season for
California populations is in the spring,
with populations in the San Francisco
Bay typically bearing young from March
15 through May 31 (Green et al., 2001).
There are two active pupping sites in
the San Francisco Bay, Mowry Slough
in the South Bay and Castro Rocks in
the North Bay. Pups have been observed
at Yerba Buena Island and Corte Madera
Marsh in the San Francisco Bay. No
births have been witnessed at these
locations, but Yerba Buena is thought to
be a potential pupping site. No harbor
seal pups have ever been seen at Pier 39.
Annual counts of harbor seals at Pier
39 range from 0 seals observed in 1999
and 2004, to a high of nine observations
in 2000 for a total of 28 observations
between 1997–2004. No more than two
harbor seals have been observed hauled
out simultaneously at any given time at
K Dock. No harbor seals have been
observed hauling out at Pier 39 July
through September. No pups have been
observed at Pier 39. Observations by
MMC volunteers indicate that observed
harbor seals at Pier 39 tend to distance
themselves from the California sea lions
hauling out in the vicinity.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine
Mammals
The applicant is authorized to take
California sea lions and Pacific harbor
seals, by Level B harassment, incidental
to the dredging activities described
previously. Level B harassment may
occur if hauled animals flush the
haulout and/or move to increase their
distance from dredging-related
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Nov 17, 2005
Jkt 208001
activities, such as noise associated with
dredging, presence of a crane barge, the
presence of workers, or unfamiliar
activity in proximity to the haulout site.
This disturbance from acoustic and
visual stimuli is the principal means of
marine mammal taking associated with
these activities.
Sudden brief noises have been shown
to elicit startle reactions in some
pinnipeds. Novel looming visual stimuli
may induce similar startle reactions in
pinnipeds. Daily engine starts and
movements of the dredge bucket and
vessel may induce startled and/or flight
behavior in marine mammals using K
dock as a haul out. However, this area
has become a tourist spot for viewing
sea lions, and the current population of
animals utilizing K dock is accustomed
to human activities and regular noise
levels from people, traffic, use of nearby
boat slips, and other marine operations.
If animals do flush into the water, they
may return to the haul-out site
immediately, stay in the water for a
length of time and then return to the
haul-out, or temporarily haul-out at
another site. Many factors contribute to
the degree of behavioral modification, if
any, including seasonality, group
composition of the pinnipeds, type of
activity they are engaged in and what
noises they may be accustomed to
experiencing. Short-term reactions such
as startle or alert reactions are unlikely
to disrupt behavior patterns such as
migrating, breeding, feeding and
sheltering, nor would they be likely to
result in serious injury to marine
mammals.
The small, self-contained, clamshell
dredge used for this activity may
produce noise of a sufficient level to
behaviorally harass marine mammals at
K dock. Measured sound exposure
levels (SELs) of similar equipment
ranged between 75–88 dBA (re 20
microPa) measured at 15 m (50 feet) (the
closest distance that the dredge unit will
be to K dock) (Boeing, 2005). Results of
an ongoing study at Vandenberg Air
Force Base of the effects of rocket
launches on pinnipeds indicate that the
percentage of Pacific harbor seals
leaving the haul-out increases with
noise level up to an SEL of
approximately 100 dBA, after which
almost all seals leave, although recent
data have shown that an increasing
percentage of seals have remained on
shore during the noise, and those that
remain are adults. Though harbor seals
are more sensitive to audio stimuli than
sea lions, these results indicate that
animals are flushed at an SEL less than
100 dBA, and it is possible that marine
mammals at K Dock may modify their
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69957
behavior as a result of the lesser dredge
noise.
If startle reactions were accompanied
by large-scale movements of marine
mammals, such as stampedes into the
water, the disruption could escalate into
Level A harassment and could result in
injury of individuals, especially if pups
were present. However, due to the
uniqueness of this particular haul-out
area, the unlikely presence of pups, and
the proposed shut-down procedures
should pups be sighted, NMFS believes
there is a very low likelihood of such
injury occurring at the Pier 39 site.
Specifically, the haul-out consists of
many separate floating platforms that
can hold up to about 25 marine
mammals each. If disrupted to the point
of flushing off the platforms, pinnipeds
can quickly leap or roll into the water
in any direction off the relatively small
platforms, avoiding a dangerous
stampede-like situation that may occur
at normal haul-out locations such as
exposed rocks. Additionally, marine
mammal pups use this haul-out very
infrequently (approximately 10 pups
have been sighted at K Dock, in 1997
and 1998, during El Nino), further
reducing potential harm to the species.
Over the last 13 years, BMMI has
observed the sea lions either ignore
various unfamiliar intrusions and
remain hauled out, or adapt to them and
eventually become habituated and
return to their normal behavior.
Disturbance from these proposed
dredging activities is expected to have a
only a short-term negligible impact to a
small number of California sea lions
relative to their population size and a
few Pacific harbor seals. At a maximum,
short-term impacts are expected to
result in a temporary reduction in
utilization of K dock as a haulout site
while work is in progress or until seals
habituate to the disturbance. The project
is not expected to result in any
permanent reduction in the number of
animals at Pier 39. NMFS agrees with
BMMI that effects will be limited to
short-term and localized behavioral
changes falling within the MMPA
definition of Level B harassment.
Mitigation
To minimize disturbance of marine
mammals from visual and acoustic
stimuli associated with the dredging
activities, BMMI will use a small
(relative to the range of sizes of
equipment that could accomplish the
task) clamshell dredge that can easily
target the specific areas to be dredged.
The smaller equipment will also
minimize the amount of turbidity
resulting from the dredging activities.
The dredge material will be
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
69958
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2005 / Notices
immediately loaded onto a barge and
transported to a nearby terrestrial
disposal site at Piers 96 and 98, which
will allow for a shorter project duration.
When not in use, the clamshell dredge
and dredge barge will be parked as far
as feasible from the K Dock. After
starting engines in morning, the
clamshell dredge will be moved as
slowly as possible to the area to be
dredged and the dredge head lowered
slowly and carefully into the water.
As mentioned previously, if a Steller
sea lion of any age or a marine mammal
pup of any species is spotted at any time
during dredging operations, operations
will cease until the animal has left the
area.
Monitoring
The K dock haulout will be monitored
periodically during dredging activities
by two NMFS-approved observers
according to the following schedule:
(1) During the week prior to the
commencement of dredging activities,
morning counts will be taken every
morning at the same time. One
afternoon count will be taken at
approximately the same time the
dredging is scheduled to stop in the
following days.
(2) During the dredging operations:
(a) One count will be taken every
morning before dredging work begins
and every afternoon once operations
cease.
(b) On the first day of dredging and on
one other day near the end of dredging
operations, monitors will be present all
day (starting one hour before operations
begin and remaining until 2 hours after
operations cease) and they will
document specific behaviors as they
relate to specific aspects of the dredging
operations and other activities. An
additional count will be conducted 2
hours after dredging operations cease.
Rates of departure and arrival of animals
from/to the haulout will be noted.
(3) Following completion of the
dredging:
(a) Morning counts (taken at
approximately same time as those taken
previously (See 1)) will be made every
day for a week.
(b) An afternoon count will be
conducted the day after dredging ceases
and on the last day of the post-dredging
monitoring.
(4) During all monitoring periods the
following data will be recorded: date,
time, observer, tidal height, species
present, maximum number of animals
hauled out, number of adults and subadults, number of males and females (if
possible), any observed behavioral
disturbances to the animals, and the
number of animals disturbed (for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Nov 17, 2005
Jkt 208001
example, if animals flushed, reports
should include the number of animals
that returned to the water, and those
that remained hauled out). During
periods of dredging a description of
dredging activities will also occur
(including location of dredge, i.e.,
between J and K Docks, or between I
and J Docks).
marine mammal habitat, including a
temporary increase in the turbidity in
the area of the dredging and a temporary
decrease in the quality of K dock as a
haul-out site as a result of increased
visual and audio stimuli.
Reporting
A draft report will be submitted to the
NMFS Southwest Assistant Regional
Administrator for Protected Resources
and to the NMFS Division of Permits,
Conservation, and Education, Office of
Protected Resources, within 90 days
after project completion. A final report
will be submitted within 30 days of
receiving NMFS’ comments, if any, on
the draft report. The Report will
contain, analyze, and summarize the
information required under Monitoring,
above. BMMI will share data collected
as a result of these monitoring activities
with other interested parties, such as the
Marine Mammal Center and other boat
marinas.
There are no subsistence uses for
California sea lions or Pacific harbor
seals in California waters, and thus,
there are no anticipated effects on their
availability for subsistence uses.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected
to be Harassed
The highest number of California sea
lions ever counted at one time on the K
Dock between June 1 and November 30
was 1244 individuals in August 2003.
The average number of individuals
counted at one time within the work
window since 2000 is lowest in July
(169) and highest in September (709).
The effects of the proposed dredging
activities are expected to be limited to
short-term startle responses and
localized behavioral changes. Based on
an average of 169 to 709 animals over
the maximum of 14 days, NMFS
estimates that California sea lions could
be exposed to audio or visual stimulus
likely to cause harassment between
2360 and 9930 times. However, based
on review of the Pier 39 observer logs
maintained over the last 14 years, which
indicate that sea lions may remain in
the area and haul out for several days in
a row at the K dock, NMFS estimates
that between 1180 to 4965 individual
animals will be harassed. The highest
total number of harbor seals ever seen
in one month between June 1 and
November 30 was 3 in November of
1997. NMFS anticipates that no more
than 3 Pacific harbor seals will be
harassed by this activity. These are
small numbers relative to the size of the
affected species or stocks.
Possible Effects of Activities on Marine
Mammal Habitat
NMFS anticipates that the action will
result in minor and short-term effects on
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Possible Effects of Activities on
Subsistence Needs
Endangered Species Act
Though a single Steller sea lion has
infrequently been sighted at the K Dock,
BMMI plans to cease dredging
operations immediately if one is seen,
and not begin dredging again until the
animal has left the area of its own
volition. NMFS does not anticipate any
impacts to Steller sea lions to result
from the issuance of the IHA.
In the 1998 programmatic Biological
Opinion addressing dredging in San
Francisco Bay, NMFS established a June
1 to November 30 work window for
dredging activities in the San Francisco
Bay to avoid impacts to steelhead trout
and Chinook salmon. BMMI proposes to
dredge between June 1 and November
30, and therefore NMFS does not
anticipate any impacts to ESA-listed
fish.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NMFS prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) on the Issuance of an
IHA for the Dredging at Pier 39, posted
the EA on the NMFS website
concurrently with the Federal Register
receipt of application notice, and
received public comment on both the
proposed IHA and the EA. NMFS issued
a Finding of No Significant Impact on
October 13, 2005. A copy of the EA and
FONSI are available upon request (see
ADDRESSES).
Conclusions
NMFS has determined that the
dredging activities described in this
document and in the application for an
IHA may result in short-term and
localized changes in behavior by small
numbers of California sea lions and
Pacific harbor seals. While behavioral
modifications may be made by the seals,
including temporarily vacating the K
Dock haulout, this action is expected to
have a negligible impact on the animals.
In addition, no take by injury or death
is anticipated, and take by harassment
will be at the lowest level practicable
due to incorporation of the mitigation
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2005 / Notices
measures mentioned previously in this
document.
NMFS has determined that the
proposed activity would result in the
harassment of small numbers of
California sea lions and Pacific harbor
seals, and that the takings will have no
more than a negligible impact on these
marine mammal stocks. Accordingly,
NMFS has issued an IHA to BMMI for
the harassment of small numbers of
California sea lions and Pacific harbor
seals incidental to dredging around Pier
39, provided the previously mentioned
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements are incorporated.
Authorization
NMFS has issued a 1–year IHA to
BMMI for the take, by harassment, of
small numbers of California sea lions
and Pacific harbor seals incidental to
maintenance dredging around I, J, and K
Docks at Pier 39 in San Francisco,
California, provided the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements are incorporated.
NMFS has determined that the proposed
activity would result in the harassment
of small numbers of marine mammals;
would have no more than a negligible
impact on the affected marine mammal
stocks; and would not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of species or stocks for
subsistence uses.
Dated: November 14, 2005.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–22861 Filed 11–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
Department of the Air Force
Program Comment for Capehart and
Wherry Era Housing and Associated
Structures and Landscape Features
(1949–1962)
Department of the Navy,
Department of the Air Force, and
Department of the Army.
ACTION: Notice of Approval of Program
Comment on Air Force and Navy
Capehart and Wherry Era Housing.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On November 18th, 2004 the
Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation (Council) approved a
program comment that facilitates the
Navy’s and Air Force’s compliance with
the National Historic Preservation Act,
with regard to management of their
inventories of Capehart and Wherry Era
15:21 Nov 17, 2005
Authority: 36 CFR 800.14.
The program comment went into
effect on November 18th, 2004.
ADDRESSES: Address comments to: HQ
AF/ILE, Environmental Programs,
ATTN: Lt Col Douglas Burkett, 1260 Air
Force Pentagon, Washington DC, 20030–
1260 (AIR FORCE) Commander, Naval
Facilities Engineering Command (BDD),
ATTN: Dr. Jay Thomas, 1322 Patterson
Ave SE Ste 1000, Washington Navy
Yard DC 20374–5065.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lt
Col Douglas Burkett at (703) 604–0632
or Dr. Jay Thomas at (202) 685–9196.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the effects of these undertakings on
historic properties and provide the
Council a reasonable opportunity to
comment with regard to such
undertakings. The Council issued the
regulations that set forth the process
through which Federal agencies may
comply with these requirements. Those
regulations are codified under 36 CFR
part 800 (‘‘Section 106 regulations’’).
The Section 106 regulations, under 36
CFR 800.14(e), provide that an agency
may request the Council for a ‘‘Program
Comment’’ allowing it to comply with
Section 106 for a category of
undertakings in lieu of conducting a
separate review for each individual
undertaking under the regular
consultation process.
DATES:
I. Background
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
VerDate Aug<31>2005
housing units, associated structures, and
landscape features.
Jkt 208001
According to the requirements for
obtaining a Program Comment, the Navy
and Air Force formally requested the
Council comment on Capehart and
Wherry Era family housing and
associated structures and landscape
features in lieu of requiring separate
reviews under §§ 800.4 through 800.6 of
the Section 106 regulations for each
individual undertaking. The Navy and
Air Force identified the category of
undertakings as maintenance, repair,
layaway, mothballing, privatization and
transfer out of federal agency
ownership, substantial alteration
through renovation, demolition, and
demolition and replacement, affecting
Navy and Air Force family housing built
between 1949 and 1962 termed
‘Capehart and Wherry’. The Air Force
and Navy also specified the likely
effects that these management actions
would have on historic properties and
the steps the Air Force and Navy would
take to ensure that the effects are taken
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69959
into account. The Air Force and Navy
included in their request to the Council
the public comments that it received
from a 60-day public comment
opportunity provided through an earlier
notice (69 FR 48462, August 10, 2004).
The Council subsequently published a
notice of intent to issue the Program
Comment (69 FR 54763, September 10,
2004) and notified the State Historic
Preservation Officers (SHPOs), the
National Conference of State Historic
Preservation Officers (NCSHPO), the
National Trust for Historic Preservation
(NTHP), Tribal Historic Preservation
Officers (THPOs), and the National
Association of Tribal Historic
Preservation Officers, and requested
their views on the Air Force and Navy’s
proposed Program Comment. During its
November 18, 2004 business meeting,
the Council membership (with the
Department of Defense recusing itself)
voted unanimously to approve and issue
the Program Comment found at the end
of this notice. The vote was 16 in favor
of approving and issuing the Program
Comment, 0 votes against, and 1
abstention (the Department of Defense),
with 3 voting members absent.
Neither the Council nor the Air Force
and Navy have engaged in consultation
with Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian
organizations, pursuant to 36 CFR
800.14(e)(4), since such consultation is
not warranted. All Air Force and Navy
actions considered under this Program
Comment will be undertaken on Air
Force and Navy property. The Program
Comment will not affect historic
properties of religious and cultural
significance, regardless of location, to
any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization since any Capehart and
Wherry actions that would affect these
types of properties are specifically
excluded under the Program Comment.
II. Response to Public Comments
Clarify a separate step for identifying
properties of particular importance. The
proposed comment does not include a
specific process for identifying
properties of particular importance.
This Program Comment now includes a
specific process of identifying
properties of particular importance. The
Air Force and Navy will notify the
Council, NCSHPO, and NTHP whether
any of these properties are of particular
importance and permits an opportunity
to review the findings.
Report for the General Public: The
requirement to prepare a report for the
general public should be separated out
from the requirement to revise the
historic context study, and should be
more clearly delineated as a separate
deliverable item. The Program Comment
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 222 (Friday, November 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69955-69959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22861]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 052405C]
Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Maintenance Dredging Around Pier 39, San Francisco, California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of incidental harassment authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the provisions of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA) as amended, notification is hereby given that
NMFS has issued an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to Bay
Marina Management Incorporated (BMMI) to take marine mammals by Level B
harassment incidental to dredging on the west side of the Pier 39
Marina on the San Francisco waterfront, CA.
DATES: Effective from October 17, 2005, through October 16, 2006.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the IHA and the application are available by
writing to Steve Leathery, Chief, Permits, Conservation, and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225, or by
telephoning the contact listed here. A copy of the application
containing a list of references used in this document may be obtained
by writing to this address, by telephoning the contact listed here (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) or online at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/PR2/Small_Take/smalltake_
info.htm#applications. Documents cited in this notice may be viewed, by
appointment, during regular business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolie Harrison, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2289, ext 166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings may be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have no more than a negligible impact on the
species or stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses, and that
the permissible methods of taking and requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking are set forth.
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.
Subsection 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited
process by which citizens of the United States can apply for an
authorization to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by
harassment. Except for certain categories of activities not pertinent
here, the MMPA defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [``Level A harassment'']; or (ii) has the potential to disturb
a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[``Level B harassment''].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS
review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment
period on any proposed authorization for the incidental harassment of
small numbers of marine mammals. Within 45 days of
[[Page 69956]]
the close of the comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny
issuance of the authorization.
Summary of Request
On August 9, 2004, NMFS received an application from BMMI
requesting an IHA for the take, by harassment, of small numbers of
California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) and Pacific harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina) incidental to the maintenance dredging the I, J, and K
Docks on the west side of Pier 39 Marina on the San Francisco
waterfront, California.
Description of the Activity
BMMI will perform maintenance dredging using a small, self-
contained clamshell-style crane barge between docks I, J, and K at the
Pier 39 west marina. These maintenance measures are necessary to
maintain safe navigation depths at the marina, which currently has
reduced water depths attributed to the accretion of bay sediment. The
dredging at Pier 39 will remove sediment to create water depths in the
project area of 9 ft (2.7 m) Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW), plus an
additional two-foot overdredge allowance. Dredging design area limits
(footprints) include the faces, approaches, and entrance channels to
each berthing area up to the limit of the adjacent pier. Dredging will
occur between June 1 and November 30 to avoid impacts to steelhead
trout and chinook salmon.
Dredging operations at the Pier 39 west marina will occur in late
fall of 2005 or the summer of 2006 and are expected to take
approximately one to two weeks to complete. Dredge machinery will
operate from 8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. daily. Approximately 13,000 yd\3\
(9,939 m\3\) of material will be removed. Dredged material will be
tested for pollutants and toxins by the Dredge Material Management
Office prior to approval to begin dredging, and dredged materials will
be deposited in accordance with local, state and Federal regulations.
Once removed, the dredged material will be transferred to Piers 96/98,
which are owned and operated by the Port of San Francisco, and from
there it will be disposed of at an approved upland disposal site.
The proposed dredging of the Pier 39 west berthing area will focus
on the channels and slips of I and J docks and half of the channel
between J and K docks. The original K dock was destroyed by the
combined weight of hundreds of California sea lions that frequently use
the area as a haul-out. Pier 39 replaced the damaged dock with a number
of ten by twelve-foot floats for the sea lions to use. Since there are
no actual berthing sites at K dock, no dredging will be necessary in
the area immediately surrounding or under K dock. The crane barge will
be situated at the furthest distance possible from K dock during each
dredging episode. The closest that the barge will be to the K dock
haul-out is when dredging the channel between J and K docks. When the
barge is dredging this channel it will be moored to the bayside of J
dock and extend the clamshell dredge arm out into the channel, towards
K dock. Since the distance between J and K docks is 100 ft (30 m) and
the barge is 30 ft (9 m) wide, it will never be positioned closer than
50 ft (15 m) to K dock at any time during the dredging project.
Comments and Responses
A notice of receipt of the BMMI application and proposed IHA was
published in the Federal Register on September 6, 2005 (70 FR 52990).
The Federal Register notice also invited comments on NMFS's associated
draft Environmental Assessment (EA), which was posted on the NMFS
website. During the comment period, NMFS received one comment from the
Marine Mammal Commission (MMC).
Comment: The MMC recommended that the requested authorization be
issued, provided that the mitigation and monitoring activities proposed
in the application and NMFS's Federal Register notice are carried out
as described.
Response: The mitigation and monitoring activities described in the
application and the Federal Register notice have been incorporated into
the requirements of the IHA.
Description of Habitat and Marine Mammals Affected by the Activity
The marine mammal species known to be present at the Pier 39 Marina
area are the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) and the
Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). Since 1993, a single adult male
Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) has been observed hauled out on K
dock intermittently during the months of July and August, and
occasionally in September (30 sightings in the last 10 years). However,
this project will not affect the Steller sea lion because dredging
activities will be halted if a Steller sea lion is observed.
Additional information on these species can be found in Marine
Mammal Stock Assessment Reports, which are available online at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/PR2/Stock_Assessment_Program/sars.html.
California Sea Lions
California sea lions range from southern Mexico to southwestern
Canada. In the United States, they breed during July after pupping in
late May to June, primarily in the Channel Islands of California. Most
individuals breed on the Channel Islands off southern California and
off Baja and mainland Mexico, although a few pups have been born on Ano
Nuevo Island and this year a pup was born on the docks at Monterey and
subsequently transferred to Ano Nuevo Island with its mother. Following
the breeding season on the Channel Islands, most adult and sub-adult
males migrate northward to central and northern California and to the
Pacific Northwest, while most females and young animals either remain
on or near the breeding grounds throughout the year or move southward
or northward, as far as Monterey Bay.
Since nearing extinction in the early 1900's, the California sea
lion population has increased and is now growing at a rate of 5.4 to
6.1 percent per year (based on pup counts) with an estimated minimum
population of 138,881 animals. Actual population numbers may be as high
as 237,000 to 244,000 animals. The population is not listed as
``endangered'' or ``threatened'' under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA), nor is this species listed as ``depleted'' or as a ``strategic
stock'' under the MMPA.
California sea lions first appeared at Pier 39 in September, 1989.
Numbers of hauled-out sea lions were relatively low the first year and
K Dock was only used as a haul out from late summer through the winter.
Within a few years, larger numbers of sea lions were observed at K Dock
and they began using the haul-out throughout the year. The Marine
Mammal Center (MMC) began monitoring California sea lions at Pier 39 in
the late 1990's and counts indicate peak usage of K dock at Pier 39 in
May and early June, just prior to the breeding season. Although numbers
decrease during mid-summer (when most adults relocate to the rookeries
for pupping and breeding) some sea lions of all age classes remain in
the area and continue to haul out at Pier 39. Within the dredging work
window (June 1 to November 30) the largest numbers of California sea
lions are found at K Dock in the late summer and fall. The highest
number of individuals ever observed at once between June 1 and November
30 at Pier 39 to date was 1244, in August of 2003. If the number of
individuals observed at one count is averaged by month, from June to
November, since 2000, the averages range from 169 for
[[Page 69957]]
July to 709 in September. Since monitoring began in 1991, only 10
California sea lion pups have been observed at Pier 39, in 1997 and
1998. These pups, which were all weaned, most likely hauled out at K
Dock due to El Nino, and pups are not expected at the project site in
``normal'' years.
Pacific Harbor Seals
Although not commonly observed at Pier 39, Pacific harbor seals
have been documented as visitors to K dock numerous times in the past
decade. Harbor seals range from Baja California in Mexico northward to
the Aleutian Islands of Alaska. The population estimate for the
California stock is 27,863 individuals (Caretta et al., 2004) and is
relatively stable.
Harbor seals inhabit coastal waters within their range and prefer
sheltered bays and inlets to the exposed coastline. Daily haul-out
behavior of harbor seals is typically dependent on the tides, weather
and time of day. Harbor seals exhibit seasonal variation in
reproductive timing depending on geography. The pupping season for
California populations is in the spring, with populations in the San
Francisco Bay typically bearing young from March 15 through May 31
(Green et al., 2001). There are two active pupping sites in the San
Francisco Bay, Mowry Slough in the South Bay and Castro Rocks in the
North Bay. Pups have been observed at Yerba Buena Island and Corte
Madera Marsh in the San Francisco Bay. No births have been witnessed at
these locations, but Yerba Buena is thought to be a potential pupping
site. No harbor seal pups have ever been seen at Pier 39.
Annual counts of harbor seals at Pier 39 range from 0 seals
observed in 1999 and 2004, to a high of nine observations in 2000 for a
total of 28 observations between 1997-2004. No more than two harbor
seals have been observed hauled out simultaneously at any given time at
K Dock. No harbor seals have been observed hauling out at Pier 39 July
through September. No pups have been observed at Pier 39. Observations
by MMC volunteers indicate that observed harbor seals at Pier 39 tend
to distance themselves from the California sea lions hauling out in the
vicinity.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine Mammals
The applicant is authorized to take California sea lions and
Pacific harbor seals, by Level B harassment, incidental to the dredging
activities described previously. Level B harassment may occur if hauled
animals flush the haulout and/or move to increase their distance from
dredging-related activities, such as noise associated with dredging,
presence of a crane barge, the presence of workers, or unfamiliar
activity in proximity to the haulout site. This disturbance from
acoustic and visual stimuli is the principal means of marine mammal
taking associated with these activities.
Sudden brief noises have been shown to elicit startle reactions in
some pinnipeds. Novel looming visual stimuli may induce similar startle
reactions in pinnipeds. Daily engine starts and movements of the dredge
bucket and vessel may induce startled and/or flight behavior in marine
mammals using K dock as a haul out. However, this area has become a
tourist spot for viewing sea lions, and the current population of
animals utilizing K dock is accustomed to human activities and regular
noise levels from people, traffic, use of nearby boat slips, and other
marine operations. If animals do flush into the water, they may return
to the haul-out site immediately, stay in the water for a length of
time and then return to the haul-out, or temporarily haul-out at
another site. Many factors contribute to the degree of behavioral
modification, if any, including seasonality, group composition of the
pinnipeds, type of activity they are engaged in and what noises they
may be accustomed to experiencing. Short-term reactions such as startle
or alert reactions are unlikely to disrupt behavior patterns such as
migrating, breeding, feeding and sheltering, nor would they be likely
to result in serious injury to marine mammals.
The small, self-contained, clamshell dredge used for this activity
may produce noise of a sufficient level to behaviorally harass marine
mammals at K dock. Measured sound exposure levels (SELs) of similar
equipment ranged between 75-88 dBA (re 20 microPa) measured at 15 m (50
feet) (the closest distance that the dredge unit will be to K dock)
(Boeing, 2005). Results of an ongoing study at Vandenberg Air Force
Base of the effects of rocket launches on pinnipeds indicate that the
percentage of Pacific harbor seals leaving the haul-out increases with
noise level up to an SEL of approximately 100 dBA, after which almost
all seals leave, although recent data have shown that an increasing
percentage of seals have remained on shore during the noise, and those
that remain are adults. Though harbor seals are more sensitive to audio
stimuli than sea lions, these results indicate that animals are flushed
at an SEL less than 100 dBA, and it is possible that marine mammals at
K Dock may modify their behavior as a result of the lesser dredge
noise.
If startle reactions were accompanied by large-scale movements of
marine mammals, such as stampedes into the water, the disruption could
escalate into Level A harassment and could result in injury of
individuals, especially if pups were present. However, due to the
uniqueness of this particular haul-out area, the unlikely presence of
pups, and the proposed shut-down procedures should pups be sighted,
NMFS believes there is a very low likelihood of such injury occurring
at the Pier 39 site. Specifically, the haul-out consists of many
separate floating platforms that can hold up to about 25 marine mammals
each. If disrupted to the point of flushing off the platforms,
pinnipeds can quickly leap or roll into the water in any direction off
the relatively small platforms, avoiding a dangerous stampede-like
situation that may occur at normal haul-out locations such as exposed
rocks. Additionally, marine mammal pups use this haul-out very
infrequently (approximately 10 pups have been sighted at K Dock, in
1997 and 1998, during El Nino), further reducing potential harm to the
species.
Over the last 13 years, BMMI has observed the sea lions either
ignore various unfamiliar intrusions and remain hauled out, or adapt to
them and eventually become habituated and return to their normal
behavior. Disturbance from these proposed dredging activities is
expected to have a only a short-term negligible impact to a small
number of California sea lions relative to their population size and a
few Pacific harbor seals. At a maximum, short-term impacts are expected
to result in a temporary reduction in utilization of K dock as a
haulout site while work is in progress or until seals habituate to the
disturbance. The project is not expected to result in any permanent
reduction in the number of animals at Pier 39. NMFS agrees with BMMI
that effects will be limited to short-term and localized behavioral
changes falling within the MMPA definition of Level B harassment.
Mitigation
To minimize disturbance of marine mammals from visual and acoustic
stimuli associated with the dredging activities, BMMI will use a small
(relative to the range of sizes of equipment that could accomplish the
task) clamshell dredge that can easily target the specific areas to be
dredged. The smaller equipment will also minimize the amount of
turbidity resulting from the dredging activities. The dredge material
will be
[[Page 69958]]
immediately loaded onto a barge and transported to a nearby terrestrial
disposal site at Piers 96 and 98, which will allow for a shorter
project duration.
When not in use, the clamshell dredge and dredge barge will be
parked as far as feasible from the K Dock. After starting engines in
morning, the clamshell dredge will be moved as slowly as possible to
the area to be dredged and the dredge head lowered slowly and carefully
into the water.
As mentioned previously, if a Steller sea lion of any age or a
marine mammal pup of any species is spotted at any time during dredging
operations, operations will cease until the animal has left the area.
Monitoring
The K dock haulout will be monitored periodically during dredging
activities by two NMFS-approved observers according to the following
schedule:
(1) During the week prior to the commencement of dredging
activities, morning counts will be taken every morning at the same
time. One afternoon count will be taken at approximately the same time
the dredging is scheduled to stop in the following days.
(2) During the dredging operations:
(a) One count will be taken every morning before dredging work
begins and every afternoon once operations cease.
(b) On the first day of dredging and on one other day near the end
of dredging operations, monitors will be present all day (starting one
hour before operations begin and remaining until 2 hours after
operations cease) and they will document specific behaviors as they
relate to specific aspects of the dredging operations and other
activities. An additional count will be conducted 2 hours after
dredging operations cease. Rates of departure and arrival of animals
from/to the haulout will be noted.
(3) Following completion of the dredging:
(a) Morning counts (taken at approximately same time as those taken
previously (See 1)) will be made every day for a week.
(b) An afternoon count will be conducted the day after dredging
ceases and on the last day of the post-dredging monitoring.
(4) During all monitoring periods the following data will be
recorded: date, time, observer, tidal height, species present, maximum
number of animals hauled out, number of adults and sub-adults, number
of males and females (if possible), any observed behavioral
disturbances to the animals, and the number of animals disturbed (for
example, if animals flushed, reports should include the number of
animals that returned to the water, and those that remained hauled
out). During periods of dredging a description of dredging activities
will also occur (including location of dredge, i.e., between J and K
Docks, or between I and J Docks).
Reporting
A draft report will be submitted to the NMFS Southwest Assistant
Regional Administrator for Protected Resources and to the NMFS Division
of Permits, Conservation, and Education, Office of Protected Resources,
within 90 days after project completion. A final report will be
submitted within 30 days of receiving NMFS' comments, if any, on the
draft report. The Report will contain, analyze, and summarize the
information required under Monitoring, above. BMMI will share data
collected as a result of these monitoring activities with other
interested parties, such as the Marine Mammal Center and other boat
marinas.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected to be Harassed
The highest number of California sea lions ever counted at one time
on the K Dock between June 1 and November 30 was 1244 individuals in
August 2003. The average number of individuals counted at one time
within the work window since 2000 is lowest in July (169) and highest
in September (709). The effects of the proposed dredging activities are
expected to be limited to short-term startle responses and localized
behavioral changes. Based on an average of 169 to 709 animals over the
maximum of 14 days, NMFS estimates that California sea lions could be
exposed to audio or visual stimulus likely to cause harassment between
2360 and 9930 times. However, based on review of the Pier 39 observer
logs maintained over the last 14 years, which indicate that sea lions
may remain in the area and haul out for several days in a row at the K
dock, NMFS estimates that between 1180 to 4965 individual animals will
be harassed. The highest total number of harbor seals ever seen in one
month between June 1 and November 30 was 3 in November of 1997. NMFS
anticipates that no more than 3 Pacific harbor seals will be harassed
by this activity. These are small numbers relative to the size of the
affected species or stocks.
Possible Effects of Activities on Marine Mammal Habitat
NMFS anticipates that the action will result in minor and short-
term effects on marine mammal habitat, including a temporary increase
in the turbidity in the area of the dredging and a temporary decrease
in the quality of K dock as a haul-out site as a result of increased
visual and audio stimuli.
Possible Effects of Activities on Subsistence Needs
There are no subsistence uses for California sea lions or Pacific
harbor seals in California waters, and thus, there are no anticipated
effects on their availability for subsistence uses.
Endangered Species Act
Though a single Steller sea lion has infrequently been sighted at
the K Dock, BMMI plans to cease dredging operations immediately if one
is seen, and not begin dredging again until the animal has left the
area of its own volition. NMFS does not anticipate any impacts to
Steller sea lions to result from the issuance of the IHA.
In the 1998 programmatic Biological Opinion addressing dredging in
San Francisco Bay, NMFS established a June 1 to November 30 work window
for dredging activities in the San Francisco Bay to avoid impacts to
steelhead trout and Chinook salmon. BMMI proposes to dredge between
June 1 and November 30, and therefore NMFS does not anticipate any
impacts to ESA-listed fish.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NMFS prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the Issuance of
an IHA for the Dredging at Pier 39, posted the EA on the NMFS website
concurrently with the Federal Register receipt of application notice,
and received public comment on both the proposed IHA and the EA. NMFS
issued a Finding of No Significant Impact on October 13, 2005. A copy
of the EA and FONSI are available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
Conclusions
NMFS has determined that the dredging activities described in this
document and in the application for an IHA may result in short-term and
localized changes in behavior by small numbers of California sea lions
and Pacific harbor seals. While behavioral modifications may be made by
the seals, including temporarily vacating the K Dock haulout, this
action is expected to have a negligible impact on the animals. In
addition, no take by injury or death is anticipated, and take by
harassment will be at the lowest level practicable due to incorporation
of the mitigation
[[Page 69959]]
measures mentioned previously in this document.
NMFS has determined that the proposed activity would result in the
harassment of small numbers of California sea lions and Pacific harbor
seals, and that the takings will have no more than a negligible impact
on these marine mammal stocks. Accordingly, NMFS has issued an IHA to
BMMI for the harassment of small numbers of California sea lions and
Pacific harbor seals incidental to dredging around Pier 39, provided
the previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements are incorporated.
Authorization
NMFS has issued a 1-year IHA to BMMI for the take, by harassment,
of small numbers of California sea lions and Pacific harbor seals
incidental to maintenance dredging around I, J, and K Docks at Pier 39
in San Francisco, California, provided the previously mentioned
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements are incorporated.
NMFS has determined that the proposed activity would result in the
harassment of small numbers of marine mammals; would have no more than
a negligible impact on the affected marine mammal stocks; and would not
have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of species or
stocks for subsistence uses.
Dated: November 14, 2005.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-22861 Filed 11-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S