Finding of No Significant Impact for Silt Salinity Control Project, Garfield County, CO, 69732-69733 [05-22809]
Download as PDF
69732
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 221
Thursday, November 17, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Glenn/Colusa County Resource
Advisory Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Glenn/Colusa County
Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)
will meet in Willows, California.
Agenda items to be covered include: (1)
Introductions, (2) approval of minutes,
(3) public comment, (4) project
proposals/possible action, (5) Web site
update, (6) general discussion, (7) next
agenda.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
November 28, 2005, from 1:30 p.m. and
end at approximately 4:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Mendocino National Forest
Supervisor’s Office, 825 N. Humboldt
Ave., Willows, CA 95988. Individuals
wishing to speak or propose agenda
items must send their names and
proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N.
Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bobbin Gaddini, Committee
Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino
National Forest, Grindstone Ranger
District, P.O. Box 164, Elk Creek, CA
95939. (530) 968–1815; e-mail
ggaddini@fs.fed.us.
The
meeting is open to the public.
Committee discussion is limited to
Forest Service staff and Committee
members. However, persons who wish
to bring matters to the attention of the
Committee any file written statements
with the Committee staff before or after
the meeting. Public input sessions will
be provided and individuals who made
written requests by November 25, 2005
will have the opportunity to address the
committee at those sessions.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Nov 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resource Conservation
Service
Finding of No Significant Impact for
Silt Salinity Control Project, Garfield
County, CO
Forest Service
ACTION:
Dated: November 9, 2005.
James F. Giachino,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 05–22793 Filed 11–16–05; 8:45 am]
Introduction
The plan/environmental assessment
was developed under the authority of
the Soil Conservation and Domestic
Allotment Act of 1936. Funding for
implementation is expected to be
provided under the Federal
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996,
Public Law 104–127, as amended; Food
Security Act of 1985, Subtitle D, Title
XII, 16 U.S.C. 3830 et seq. An
environmental evaluation was
undertaken in conjunction with the
development of the watershed plan.
This evaluation was conducted in
consultation with local, State and
Federal agencies as well as with
interested organizations and
individuals. Copies of the Plan/
Environmental may be obtained by
contacting Allen Green, Colorado State
Conservationist at the following
address. Data developed during the
environmental evaluation is available
for public review at the following
location as well: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resource
Conservation Service, 655 Parfet St.,
Lakewood, Colorado 80215–5517.
Background
The Silt unit was not identified by
name in Title II of the Colorado River
Basin Salinity Control Act, but was
identified by USDA as an area which
should be studied for possible salinity
control.
The combined environmental
assessment has three major components:
(1) To determine the contribution of salt
loading from the irrigated farmland; (2)
to determine the opportunity for USDA
to reduce salt loading through
improvements in irrigation delivery and
application systems; (3) to determine
environmental effects of the proposed
action.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Approximately 7,430 acres can be
irrigated in the Silt Unit by five
irrigation ditches. One of the aspects of
the environmental evaluation involved
inventorying and analyzing current
irrigation systems and management
practices. Data was analyzed on the five
irrigation ditch systems. Each of the
systems was analyzed to determine
what types of improvements are needed.
The remaining ditches were not studied
because they are small or no longer in
use.
The Wasatch Formation, a claystone
shale marine formation with a very high
salt content, underlies much of the
valley and is the principal source of salt
contributed to the Colorado River.
Lenses of crystaline salt often are
exposed during excavation into shale.
Because of the arid climate, salts have
not been leached naturally and applying
excess irrigation water to the soil greatly
accelerates the leaching process.
The Silt Unit contributes
approximately 24,700 tons of salt
annually to the Colorado River based on
the 17-year USGS record of volume and
concentration of outflow, minus volume
and concentration of inflow. The 17year record spans a good representation
of dry and wet years. Approximately
14,030 tons come from irrigation
practices, and is in the middle of the
range of values used for the seven
salinity project areas e.g. Grand Valley,
Colorado; Lower Gunnison, Colorado;
Mancos Valley, Colorado; McElmo
Creek, Colorado; Uinta Basin, Utah;
Price-San Rafael, Utah; and Big Sandy
River, Wyoming. The remaining 10,670
tons represents salt produced from
natural sources. Salt loading estimates
include approximately 4,160 tons from
ditch seepage and approximately 9,870
tons from on-farm deep percolation of
irrigation water.
The proposed alternative plan
contains structural and management
improvements to irrigation systems
which will in turn reduce salt loading
to the Colorado River by 3,990 tons.
Consultation-Public Participation
The Bookcliff Conservation District
led the public participation process,
which included several Public meetings.
Public involvement primarily consisted
of meetings; however, local newspapers
were used to publicize the project.
Several State and Federal agencies were
consulted during project plan
development.
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2005 / Notices
Proposed Action
The proposed action will result in
reducing seepage from the lateral
ditches and increasing the irrigation
efficiency to reduce deep percolation on
2,800 acres.
This action will consist of piping or
concrete lining 45,000 linear feet of
earthen irrigation ditches. On-farm
irrigation improvements would consist
of improved surface application systems
and sprinkler irrigation.
The estimated total construction cost
for the pipeline and sprinkler systems is
$3,546,000. The total estimated project
cost is $4,964,400. It is recommended
that the federal cost-share used to
implement the plan not be greater than
75 percent. A cost effectiveness analysis
was used to determine the annual cost
per ton of salt reduction.
agencies did not reveal any violations of
any laws, including the National
Environmental Policy Act.
Many of the wetlands in the project
area are ‘‘irrigation induced.’’ A
minimal number of these acres would
be impacted. Wetland functions for the
majority of these are already impacted
by the land use associated with them.
The distribution and size of these
wetlands is not likely to change.
The water quality of the Colorado
River will be enhanced due to a
reduction in salt loading from
agriculture.
The agricultural producers
participating in the project will benefit
from the labor savings associated with
implementation of improved on-farm
irrigation application systems.
Basic Conclusions
The conservation treatment associated
with the proposed action will not
change the air quality or potable water
quality of the area. The project will not
create any new hazards to the
transportation network within the
effected project area. For these reasons
it is felt that the public health and safety
conditions of the effected area will not
be significantly impacted.
There are no known unique
geographic features in the project area
that could be impacted by the proposed
action.
During the inter-agency review
process of the project plan no highly
controversial effects were identified.
Past experience with similar projects
in the area provide a high degree of
confidence in the predicted impacts of
the proposed actions.
This project is not unusual in nature
and is quite similar to a project
currently being implemented in Mesa
County. For this reason we feel
confident that no precedents are being
set with this project.
No significant individual or
cumulative effects to the human
environment are expected when
considering the context and intensity of
the proposed action.
Our project investigations did not
identify any cultural resource sites
currently listed on the National List of
Historic Places. In light of this, the
proposed action will not impact any
such sites.
Threatened and endangered species
habitats do exist within the project
boundaries. The proposed treatment
will not change the extent or
composition of this habitat therefore no
impact is anticipated.
Communications with State and
Federal natural resource management
I find that the proposed action is not
a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Nov 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
Ultimate Conclusion
Dennis Alexander,
Assistant State Conservationist-Programs.
[FR Doc. 05–22809 Filed 11–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 05–BIS–03]
Action Affecting Export Privileges;
Performance Medical Supplies; In the
Matter of: Performance Medical
Supplies, 16 Gardenia Cresent,
Cheltenham, Victoria 3192, Australia;
Respondent; Order Relating to
Performance Medical Supplies
The Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’)
has initiated an administrative
proceeding against Performance Medical
Supplies (‘‘Performance Medical
Supplies’’) pursuant to Section 766.3 of
the Export Administration Regulations
(currently codified at 15 CFR Parts 730–
774 (2005)) (‘‘Regulations’’),1 and
Section 13(c) of the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended
(50 U.S.C. app. 2401–2420 (2000))
(‘‘Act’’),2 through issuance of a charging
1 The
violations charged occurred in 2000. The
Regulations governing the violations at issue are
found in the 2000 version of the Code of Federal
Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730–774 (2000)). The
2005 Regulations establish the procedures that
apply to this matter.
2 From August 21, 1994 through November 12,
2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the
President, through Executive Order 12924, which
had been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69733
letter to Performance Medical Supplies
that alleged that Performance Medical
Supplies committed 10 violations of the
Regulations. Specifically, the charges
are:
1. One violation of 15 CFR 764.2(d)—
Conspiracy to Export Physical Therapy
Equipment to Iran Without the Required
U.S. Government Authorizations: In or
about April 2000, Performance Medical
Supplies conspired and acted in concert
with others, known and unknown, to
bring about acts that constitute
violations of the Regulations by
knowingly participating in the export of
physical therapy equipment from the
United States, via Australia, to Iran
without the required U.S. Government
authorization. Pursuant to Section 746.7
of the Regulations, authorization was
required from the Office of Foreign
Assets Control, U.S. Department of the
Treasury (‘‘OFAC’’) before the physical
therapy equipment, items subject to the
Regulations and the Iranian
Transactions Regulations, could be
exported from the United States to Iran.
In furtherance of conspiracy,
Performance Medical Supplies and its
co-conspirator devised and employed a
scheme under which Performance
Medical Supplies would purchase the
items from its co-conspirator in the
United States and would then forward
the items to Iran.
2. Three violations of 15 CFR
764.2(b)—Aiding the Export of Physical
Therapy Equipment to Iran Without the
Required U.S. Government
Authorization: From on or about March
28, 2000 through and including April 7,
2000, Performance Medical Supplies
engaged in conduct prohibited by
Regulations when it, on three occasions,
aided the export of physical therapy
equipment from the United States to
Iran, via Australia, without the required
U.S. Government authorization.
Pursuant to Section 746.7 of the
Regulations, authorization from OFAC
was required for the export of physical
therapy equipment, items subject to the
Regulations and the Iranian
Transactions Regulations, from the
United States to Iran. The U.S. exporter
did not have OFAC authorization for the
export.
CFR 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the
Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–
1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). On November 13, 2000, the
Act was reauthorized and it remained in effect
through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as extended by the Notice
of August 2, 2005 (70 FR 45273, August 5, 2005),
has continued the Regulations in effect under
IEEPA.
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 221 (Thursday, November 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69732-69733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22809]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resource Conservation Service
Finding of No Significant Impact for Silt Salinity Control
Project, Garfield County, CO
Introduction
The plan/environmental assessment was developed under the authority
of the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act of 1936. Funding
for implementation is expected to be provided under the Federal
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996, Public Law 104-127, as amended;
Food Security Act of 1985, Subtitle D, Title XII, 16 U.S.C. 3830 et
seq. An environmental evaluation was undertaken in conjunction with the
development of the watershed plan. This evaluation was conducted in
consultation with local, State and Federal agencies as well as with
interested organizations and individuals. Copies of the Plan/
Environmental may be obtained by contacting Allen Green, Colorado State
Conservationist at the following address. Data developed during the
environmental evaluation is available for public review at the
following location as well: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resource Conservation Service, 655 Parfet St., Lakewood, Colorado
80215-5517.
Background
The Silt unit was not identified by name in Title II of the
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act, but was identified by USDA
as an area which should be studied for possible salinity control.
The combined environmental assessment has three major components:
(1) To determine the contribution of salt loading from the irrigated
farmland; (2) to determine the opportunity for USDA to reduce salt
loading through improvements in irrigation delivery and application
systems; (3) to determine environmental effects of the proposed action.
Approximately 7,430 acres can be irrigated in the Silt Unit by five
irrigation ditches. One of the aspects of the environmental evaluation
involved inventorying and analyzing current irrigation systems and
management practices. Data was analyzed on the five irrigation ditch
systems. Each of the systems was analyzed to determine what types of
improvements are needed. The remaining ditches were not studied because
they are small or no longer in use.
The Wasatch Formation, a claystone shale marine formation with a
very high salt content, underlies much of the valley and is the
principal source of salt contributed to the Colorado River. Lenses of
crystaline salt often are exposed during excavation into shale. Because
of the arid climate, salts have not been leached naturally and applying
excess irrigation water to the soil greatly accelerates the leaching
process.
The Silt Unit contributes approximately 24,700 tons of salt
annually to the Colorado River based on the 17-year USGS record of
volume and concentration of outflow, minus volume and concentration of
inflow. The 17-year record spans a good representation of dry and wet
years. Approximately 14,030 tons come from irrigation practices, and is
in the middle of the range of values used for the seven salinity
project areas e.g. Grand Valley, Colorado; Lower Gunnison, Colorado;
Mancos Valley, Colorado; McElmo Creek, Colorado; Uinta Basin, Utah;
Price-San Rafael, Utah; and Big Sandy River, Wyoming. The remaining
10,670 tons represents salt produced from natural sources. Salt loading
estimates include approximately 4,160 tons from ditch seepage and
approximately 9,870 tons from on-farm deep percolation of irrigation
water.
The proposed alternative plan contains structural and management
improvements to irrigation systems which will in turn reduce salt
loading to the Colorado River by 3,990 tons.
Consultation-Public Participation
The Bookcliff Conservation District led the public participation
process, which included several Public meetings. Public involvement
primarily consisted of meetings; however, local newspapers were used to
publicize the project. Several State and Federal agencies were
consulted during project plan development.
[[Page 69733]]
Proposed Action
The proposed action will result in reducing seepage from the
lateral ditches and increasing the irrigation efficiency to reduce deep
percolation on 2,800 acres.
This action will consist of piping or concrete lining 45,000 linear
feet of earthen irrigation ditches. On-farm irrigation improvements
would consist of improved surface application systems and sprinkler
irrigation.
The estimated total construction cost for the pipeline and
sprinkler systems is $3,546,000. The total estimated project cost is
$4,964,400. It is recommended that the federal cost-share used to
implement the plan not be greater than 75 percent. A cost effectiveness
analysis was used to determine the annual cost per ton of salt
reduction.
Basic Conclusions
The conservation treatment associated with the proposed action will
not change the air quality or potable water quality of the area. The
project will not create any new hazards to the transportation network
within the effected project area. For these reasons it is felt that the
public health and safety conditions of the effected area will not be
significantly impacted.
There are no known unique geographic features in the project area
that could be impacted by the proposed action.
During the inter-agency review process of the project plan no
highly controversial effects were identified.
Past experience with similar projects in the area provide a high
degree of confidence in the predicted impacts of the proposed actions.
This project is not unusual in nature and is quite similar to a
project currently being implemented in Mesa County. For this reason we
feel confident that no precedents are being set with this project.
No significant individual or cumulative effects to the human
environment are expected when considering the context and intensity of
the proposed action.
Our project investigations did not identify any cultural resource
sites currently listed on the National List of Historic Places. In
light of this, the proposed action will not impact any such sites.
Threatened and endangered species habitats do exist within the
project boundaries. The proposed treatment will not change the extent
or composition of this habitat therefore no impact is anticipated.
Communications with State and Federal natural resource management
agencies did not reveal any violations of any laws, including the
National Environmental Policy Act.
Many of the wetlands in the project area are ``irrigation
induced.'' A minimal number of these acres would be impacted. Wetland
functions for the majority of these are already impacted by the land
use associated with them. The distribution and size of these wetlands
is not likely to change.
The water quality of the Colorado River will be enhanced due to a
reduction in salt loading from agriculture.
The agricultural producers participating in the project will
benefit from the labor savings associated with implementation of
improved on-farm irrigation application systems.
Ultimate Conclusion
I find that the proposed action is not a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
Dennis Alexander,
Assistant State Conservationist-Programs.
[FR Doc. 05-22809 Filed 11-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P