Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206, 69605 [E5-6307]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 16, 2005 / Notices
November 22, 2005, 1
p.m.–2 p.m. (ET)
PLACE: National Science Foundation,
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA
22230, Public Meeting Room 120.
STATUS: This meeting will be open to the
public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Tuesday,
November 22, 2005, Open Session
DATE AND TIME:
Open Session (1–2 p.m.)
Discussion of draft NSB report,
National Science Board 2020 Vision for
the National Science Foundation (NSB–
05–142), https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/
documents/2005/nsb05142/
cover_letter.pdf.
Dr.
Michael P. Crosby, Executive Officer
and NSB Office Director. (703) 292–
7000. https://www.nsf.gov/nsb.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael P. Crosby,
Executive Officer and NSB Office Director.
[FR Doc. 05–22705 Filed 11–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. STN 50–454]
[License No. NPF–37]
Exelon Generation Company, LLC;
Notice of Issuance of Director’s
Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206
Notice is hereby given that the
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, has issued a director’s
decision with regard to a petition dated
March 2, 2005, filed by Mr. Barry
Quigley, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘petitioner.’’ On March 4, 2005, the
petitioner provided additional clarifying
information during a conference call
with the Petition Review Board. The
conference call was recorded; a
transcript is publicly available in the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s
(NRC’s) Agencywide Document Access
and Management System (ADAMS) at
Accession No. ML050870619. The
petition concerns the operation of the
Byron Station, Unit 1 which is owned
and operated by Exelon Generation
Company, LLC (Exelon).
The petition requested that the NRC
take enforcement action against Exelon’s
Byron Station for failure to comply with
10 CFR part 50, Appendix B, Criterion
XVI. Specifically, the petitioner stated
that the 1C loop stop isolation valve
(LSIV) has been broken for at least 6
years and has not been repaired.
The petition of March 2, 2005, raises
concerns originating from the condition
that the 1C LSIV can be difficult to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:56 Nov 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
close, to the point that the protective
features of the motor actuate. The
petitioner indicated that the failure
mechanism is metal-to-metal contact
between the valve disc and a misaligned
valve guide which introduces debris
into the reactor coolant system (RCS).
A public meeting with Exelon was
held in the NRC Region III offices on
March 21, 2005; a summary of the
meeting is available at ADAMS
Accession No. ML050820530. The
petitioner was in attendance and offered
comments prior to adjournment of the
meeting. The licensee made several
submittals containing additional
information regarding the LSIV
performance and testing as well as a
May 27, 2005, response to an NRC staff
Request for Additional Information.
As a result of evaluation of the
information provided, the NRC prepared
a proposed Director’s Decision, copies
of which were sent to the petitioner and
to the licensee for comment on July 29,
2005, and August 1, 2005, respectively.
The petitioner responded with
comments on August 14, 2005, and the
licensee responded on August 12, 2005.
The comments and the NRC staff’s
response to them are included in the
Director’s Decision.
The Director of the Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation has determined that
the request to take enforcement action
against Exelon’s Byron Station for
failure to comply with 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix B, Criterion XVI, be denied.
The reasons for this decision are
explained in the director’s decision
pursuant to Title 10 of Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.206 DD–
05–05, the complete text of which is
available in ADAMS for inspection at
the Commission’s Public Document
Room, located at One White Flint North,
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland, and from the ADAMS Public
Library component on the NRC’s Web
site, https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm.html (the Public Electronic Reading
Room).
The staff concluded that the 1C LSIV
(which does not perform a safety
function) is unlikely to be degraded to
a condition where the valve guides, or
a portion of the valve guides, can loosen
and migrate to the reactor vessel during
normal plant operation. Nevertheless,
the NRC considered the potential for the
release of loose parts into the RCS at
Byron Station, Unit 1. The NRC
concluded that loose parts from the 1C
LSIV have an acceptability low potential
of occurrence. Even so, the licensee has
provisions to locate, identify, and
respond to both large and small loose
parts. Further, because the licensee
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69605
complies with NRC Staff Position RSB
5–1, ‘‘Design Requirements of the
Residual Heat Removal System,’’ the
NRC is assured that for LSIV loose parts
scenarios that postulate obstruction of
the chemical and volume control system
letdown line or obstruction of the
pressurizer spray line/nozzle will not
prevent safe shutdown of Byron Station,
Unit 1.
A copy of the Director’s Decision will
be filed with the Secretary of the
Commission for the Commission’s
review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206
of the Commission’s regulations. As
provided for by this regulation, the
Director’s Decision will constitute the
final action of the Commission 25 days
after the date of the decision, unless the
Commission, on its own motion,
institutes a review of the director’s
decision in that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day
of November, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
J.E. Dyer,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E5–6307 Filed 11–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 72–27]
Notice of Availability of Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for Construction
and Operation of the Humboldt Bay
Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Availability and
Finding of No Significant Impact.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Park, Environmental and
Performance Assessment Directorate,
Division of Waste Management and
Environmental Protection, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555. Telephone:
(301) 415–5835; Fax number: (301) 415–
5397; E-mail: jrp@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
By letter dated December 15, 2003,
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
(PG&E) submitted an application to the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC), requesting a site-specific license
to build and operate an Independent
Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI),
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-6307]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. STN 50-454]
[License No. NPF-37]
Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Director's
Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206
Notice is hereby given that the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, has issued a director's decision with regard to a petition
dated March 2, 2005, filed by Mr. Barry Quigley, hereinafter referred
to as the ``petitioner.'' On March 4, 2005, the petitioner provided
additional clarifying information during a conference call with the
Petition Review Board. The conference call was recorded; a transcript
is publicly available in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's)
Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) at Accession
No. ML050870619. The petition concerns the operation of the Byron
Station, Unit 1 which is owned and operated by Exelon Generation
Company, LLC (Exelon).
The petition requested that the NRC take enforcement action against
Exelon's Byron Station for failure to comply with 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix B, Criterion XVI. Specifically, the petitioner stated that the
1C loop stop isolation valve (LSIV) has been broken for at least 6
years and has not been repaired.
The petition of March 2, 2005, raises concerns originating from the
condition that the 1C LSIV can be difficult to close, to the point that
the protective features of the motor actuate. The petitioner indicated
that the failure mechanism is metal-to-metal contact between the valve
disc and a misaligned valve guide which introduces debris into the
reactor coolant system (RCS).
A public meeting with Exelon was held in the NRC Region III offices
on March 21, 2005; a summary of the meeting is available at ADAMS
Accession No. ML050820530. The petitioner was in attendance and offered
comments prior to adjournment of the meeting. The licensee made several
submittals containing additional information regarding the LSIV
performance and testing as well as a May 27, 2005, response to an NRC
staff Request for Additional Information.
As a result of evaluation of the information provided, the NRC
prepared a proposed Director's Decision, copies of which were sent to
the petitioner and to the licensee for comment on July 29, 2005, and
August 1, 2005, respectively. The petitioner responded with comments on
August 14, 2005, and the licensee responded on August 12, 2005. The
comments and the NRC staff's response to them are included in the
Director's Decision.
The Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has
determined that the request to take enforcement action against Exelon's
Byron Station for failure to comply with 10 CFR part 50, Appendix B,
Criterion XVI, be denied. The reasons for this decision are explained
in the director's decision pursuant to Title 10 of Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.206 DD-05-05, the complete text of which
is available in ADAMS for inspection at the Commission's Public
Document Room, located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and from
the ADAMS Public Library component on the NRC's Web site, https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
The staff concluded that the 1C LSIV (which does not perform a
safety function) is unlikely to be degraded to a condition where the
valve guides, or a portion of the valve guides, can loosen and migrate
to the reactor vessel during normal plant operation. Nevertheless, the
NRC considered the potential for the release of loose parts into the
RCS at Byron Station, Unit 1. The NRC concluded that loose parts from
the 1C LSIV have an acceptability low potential of occurrence. Even so,
the licensee has provisions to locate, identify, and respond to both
large and small loose parts. Further, because the licensee complies
with NRC Staff Position RSB 5-1, ``Design Requirements of the Residual
Heat Removal System,'' the NRC is assured that for LSIV loose parts
scenarios that postulate obstruction of the chemical and volume control
system letdown line or obstruction of the pressurizer spray line/nozzle
will not prevent safe shutdown of Byron Station, Unit 1.
A copy of the Director's Decision will be filed with the Secretary
of the Commission for the Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR
2.206 of the Commission's regulations. As provided for by this
regulation, the Director's Decision will constitute the final action of
the Commission 25 days after the date of the decision, unless the
Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the director's
decision in that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of November, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
J.E. Dyer,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E5-6307 Filed 11-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P