Security Zone; Cape Fear River, Eagle Island, North Carolina State Port Authority Terminal, Wilmington, NC, 69279-69282 [05-22576]
Download as PDF
69279
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 15, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1301(a), 1302(b)(3),
1341, 1344, 1362.
PART 4044—ALLOCATION OF
ASSETS IN SINGLE-EMPLOYER
PLANS
Appendix B to Part 4044—Interest
Rates Used to Value Benefits
5. In appendix B to part 4044, a new
entry for December 2005, as set forth
below, is added to the table.
*
I
4. The authority citation for part 4044
continues to read as follows:
I
*
*
*
*
The values of it are:
For valuation dates occurring in the month—
it
*
*
*
December 2005 ................................................................
Issued in Washington, DC, on this 9th day
of November 2005.
James J. Armbruster,
Acting Director, Legislative and Regulatory
Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05–22604 Filed 11–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7708–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–05–126]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Approaches to Annapolis
Harbor, Spa Creek and Severn River,
Annapolis, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce
the special local regulations at 33 CFR
100.511 during the Eastport Yacht Club
Lights Parade, a marine event to be held
December 10, 2005, on the waters of Spa
Creek and the Severn River at
Annapolis, Maryland. These special
local regulations are necessary to
control vessel traffic due to the confined
nature of the waterway and expected
vessel congestion during the event. The
effect will be to restrict general
navigation in the regulated area for the
safety of event participants, spectators
and vessels transiting the event area.
DATES: 33 CFR 100.511 will be enforced
from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on
December 10, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ronald Houck, Marine Events
Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point
Road, Baltimore, MD 21226–1971, and
(410) 576–2674.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:15 Nov 14, 2005
Jkt 208001
for t =
it
for t =
1–20
*
.0475
>20
*
.0400
The
Eastport Yacht Club will sponsor a
lighted boat parade on the waters of Spa
Creek and the Severn River at
Annapolis, Maryland. The event will
consist of approximately 50 boats
traveling at slow speed along two
separate parade routes in Annapolis
Harbor. The participating boats will
range in length from 10 to 60 feet, and
each will be decorated with holiday
lights. In order to ensure the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting
vessels, 33 CFR 100.511 will be
enforced for the duration of the event.
Under provisions of 33 CFR 100.511,
vessels may not enter the regulated area
without permission from the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander. Spectator
vessels may anchor outside the
regulated area but may not block a
navigable channel. Because these
restrictions will be in effect for a limited
period, they should not result in a
significant disruption of maritime
traffic.
In addition to this notice, the
maritime community will be provided
extensive advance notification via the
Local Notice to Mariners, marine
information broadcasts, and area
newspapers, so mariners can adjust
their plans accordingly.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: November 2, 2005.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–22574 Filed 11–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PO 00000
it
*
for t =
*
N/A
N/A
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05–05–123]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Cape Fear River, Eagle
Island, North Carolina State Port
Authority Terminal, Wilmington, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
at the North Carolina State Port
Authority (NCSPA), Wilmington to
include the Cape Fear River and Eagle
Island. Entry into or movement within
the security zone will be prohibited
without authorization from the Captain
of the Port (COTP), Wilmingon, NC.
This action is necessary to safeguard the
vessels and the facility from sabotage,
subversive acts, or other threats.
DATES: This rule is effective from
October 1, 2005, until December 31,
2005.
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket CGD05–05–
123 and are available for inspection or
copying at the Marine Safety Unit 721
Medical Center Drive, Suite 100,
Wilmington, North Carolina 28401
between 7:30 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LTJG Diego Benavides, Branch Chief,
Port Safety and Security (910) 772–2200
or toll free (877) 229–0770.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
rule. The Coast Guard is promulgating
this security zone regulation to protect
NCSPA Wilmington and the
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
69280
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 15, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
surrounding vicinity from threats to
national security. Accordingly, based on
the military function exception set forth
in the Administrative Procedure Act, 5
U.S.C. 553(a)(1), notice and comment
rulemaking and advance publication are
not required for this regulation.
Background and Purpose
Vessels frequenting the North
Carolina State Port Authority (NCSPA)
Wilmington facility serve as a vital link
in the transportation of military
munitions, explosives, equipment, and
personnel in support of Department of
Defense missions at home and abroad.
This vital transportation link is
potentially at risk to acts of terrorism,
sabotage and other criminal acts.
Munitions and explosives laden vessels
also pose a unique threat to the safety
and security of the NCSPA Wilmington,
vessel crews, and others in the maritime
and surrounding community should the
vessels be subject to acts of terrorism or
sabotage, or other criminal acts. The
ability to control waterside access to
vessels laden with munitions and
explosives, as well as those used to
transport military equipment and
personnel, moored at the NCSPA
Wilmington is critical to national
defense and security, as well as to the
safety and security of the NCSPA
Wilmington, vessel crews, and others in
the maritime and surrounding
community. Therefore, the Coast Guard
is establishing this security zone to
safeguard human life, vessels and
facilities from sabotage, terrorist acts or
other criminal acts.
Discussion of Rule
The security zone is necessary to
provide security for, and prevent acts of
terrorism against vessels loading or
offloading at the NCSPA Wilmington
facility during a military operation. It
will include an area from 800 yards
south of the Cape Fear River Bridge
encompassing the southern end of Eagle
Island, the Cape Fear River, and the
grounds of the State Port Authority
Terminal south to South Wilmington
Terminal. The security zone will
prevent access to unauthorized persons
who may attempt to enter the secure
area via the Cape Fear River, the North
Carolina State Port Authority terminal,
or use Eagle Island as vantage point for
surveillance of the secure area. The
security zone will protect vessels
moored at the facility, their crews,
others in the maritime community and
the surrounding communities from
subversive or terrorist attack that could
cause serious negative impact to vessels,
the port, or the environment, and result
in numerous casualties.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:15 Nov 14, 2005
Jkt 208001
No person or vessel may enter or
remain in the security zone at any time
without the permission of the COTP,
Wilmington NC. Each person or vessel
operating within the security zone must
obey any direction or order of the COTP.
The COTP may take possession and
control of any vessel in a security zone
and/or remove any person, vessel,
article or thing from this security zone.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
Although this regulation restricts
access to the security zone, the effect of
this regulation will not be significant
because: (i) The COTP or his or her
representative may authorize access to
the security zone; (ii) the security zone
will be enforced for limited duration;
and (iii) the Coast Guard will make
notifications via maritime advisories so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the Cape Fear River that is
within the security zone.
This security zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. Although the
security zone will apply to the entire
width of the river, traffic will be
allowed to pass through the zone with
the permission of the COTP or his or her
designated representative. Before the
effective period, we will issue maritime
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
advisories widely available to users of
the river.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process. If
the rule will affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the address
listed under ADDRESSES.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 15, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:15 Nov 14, 2005
Jkt 208001
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. A final ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a final
‘‘Categorical Exclusion Determination’’
will be available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–
1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–123 to
read as follows: § 165.T05–123 Security
Zone: Cape Fear River, Eagle Island and
North Carolina State Port Authority
Terminal, Wilmington, NC.
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone: The grounds of the North
Carolina State Port Authority,
Wilmington Terminal and the southern
portion of Eagle Island; and an area
encompassed from South Wilmington
Terminal at 34°10′38.394″ N,
077°57′16.248″ W (Point 1); across Cape
Fear River to Southern most entrance of
Brunswick River on the West Bank at
34°10′38.052″ N, 077°57′43.143″ W
(Point 2); extending along the West bank
of the Brunswick River for
approximately 750 yards to
34°10′57.062″ N, 077°58′01.342″ W
(Point 3); proceeding North across the
Brunswick River to the east bank at
34°11′04.846″ N, 077°58′02.861″ W
I
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69281
(Point 4) and continuing north on the
east bank for approximately 5000 yards
along Eagle Island to 34°13′17.815″ N,
077°58′30.671″ W (Point 5); proceeding
East to 34°13′19.488″ N, 077°58′24.414″
W (Point 6); and then approximately
1700 yards to 34°13′27.169″ N,
077°57′51.753″ W (Point 7); proceeding
East to 34°13′21.226″ N, 077°57′19.264″
W (Point 8); then across Cape Fear River
to the Northeast corner of the Colonial
Terminal Pier at 34°13′18.724″ N,
077°57′07.401″ W (Point 9), 800 yards
South of Cape Fear Memorial Bridge;
Proceeding South along shoreline (east
bank) of Cape Fear River for
approximately 500 yards; Proceeding
east inland to Wilmington State Port
property line at 34°13′03.196″ N,
077°56′52.211″ W (Point 10); extending
South along Wilmington State Port
property line to 34°12′43.409″ N,
077°56′50.815″ W (Point 11); Proceeding
to the North entrance of Wilmington
State Port at 34°12′28.854″ N,
077°57′01.017″ W (Point 12); Proceeding
South along Wilmington State Port
property line to 34°12′20.819″ N,
077°57′08.871″ W (Point 13); Continuing
South along the Wilmington State Port
property line to 34°12′08.164″ N,
077°57′08.530″ W (Point 14); Continuing
along State Port property to
34°11′44.426″ N, 077°56′55.003″ W
(Point 15); Proceeding South to the main
gate of the Wilmington State Port at
34°11′29.578″ N, 077°56′55.240″ W
(Point 16); Proceeding South
approximately 750 yards to the
Southeast property corner of the Apex
facility at 34°11′10.936″ N,
077°57′04.798″ W (Point 17); Proceeding
West to East bank of Cape Fear River at
34°11′11.092″ N, 077°57′17.146″ W
(Point 18); Proceeding South along East
bank of Cape Fear River to Original
point of origin at 34°10′38.394″ N,
077°57′16.248″ W (Point 1). (NAD 1983)
(b) Captain of the Port. Captain of the
Port means the Commanding Officer of
the Marine Safety Unit Wilmington, NC,
or any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized to act on his or her behalf.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons are
required to comply with the general
regulations governing security zones in
33 CFR 165.33.
(2) Persons or vessels with a need to
enter or get passage within the security
zone, must first request authorization
from the Captain of the Port. The
Captain of the Port’s representative
enforcing the zone can be contacted on
VHF marine band radio, channel 16.
The Captain of the Port can be contacted
at (910) 772–2200 or toll free (877) 229–
0770.
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
69282
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 15, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The operator of any vessel within
this security zone must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by the Captain
of the Port or his or her designated
representative.
(ii) Proceed as directed by the Captain
of the Port or his or her designated
representative.
(d) Effective period. This section is
effective from October 1, 2005, until
December 31, 2005.
Dated: September 30, 2005.
Byron L. Black,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port, Commanding Officer Marine Safety
Unit Wilmington, North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 05–22576 Filed 11–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Electronic Access
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 050801214–5283–02; I.D.
072105D]
RIN 0648–AQ91
Fisheries Off West Coast States and in
the Western Pacific; Western Pacific
Pelagic Fisheries; Sea Turtle Mitigation
Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS issues a final rule to
reduce and mitigate interactions
between sea turtles and fisheries
managed under the Fishery
Management Plan for the Pelagic
Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region
(Pelagics FMP). This rule includes
requirements for attending protected
species workshops, for handling,
resuscitating, and releasing sea turtles
that are hooked or entangled in fishing
gear, and for fishing gear configuration.
This action is being taken in part to
comply with the terms and conditions
of a 2004 Biological Opinion on impacts
on sea turtles by fisheries managed
under the Pelagics FMP.
DATES: Effective December 15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the following
documents are available from William
L. Robinson, Administrator, NMFS,
Pacific Islands Region (PIR), 1601
Kapiolani Boulevard, Suite 1110,
Honolulu, HI 96814:
• Regulatory amendment document
entitled ‘‘Sea Turtle Mitigation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:15 Nov 14, 2005
Jkt 208001
Measures Gear and Handling
Requirements, Protected Species
Workshop Attendance, and ShallowSetting Restrictions A Regulatory
Amendment to the Western Pacific
Pelagics Fishery Management Plan,’’
which contains an Environmental
Assessment (EA), Regulatory Impact
Review and a Final Regulatory
Flexibility Assessment;
• The Final Regulatory Flexibility
Assessment; and
• The Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) for the EA.
Requests for these documents should
indicate whether paper copies or
electronic copies on CD–ROM are
preferred. The documents are also
available at the following web site:
https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/pir.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Harman, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, PIR, NMFS, 808–944–2271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This Federal Register document is
also accessible via the Internet at: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/
publications.
On August 15, 2005, NMFS published
in the Federal Register a proposed rule
(70 FR 47777) that would require vessel
owners and operators to attend
protected species workshops, to handle,
resuscitate, and release sea turtles that
are hooked or entangled in fishing gear,
and to modify fishing gear
configuration. This action is being taken
in part to comply with the terms and
conditions of a 2004 Biological Opinion
resulting from a section 7 consultation
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) that analyzed the impacts on sea
turtles caused by fisheries managed
under the Pelagics FMP.
In a Biological Opinion issued on
February 23, 2004, NMFS concluded
that the fisheries managed under the
Pelagics FMP were not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
sea turtles or other species listed as
threatened or endangered under the
ESA.. Among other things, the terms
and conditions of the 2004 Biological
Opinion require the following: (1)
owners and operators of vessels
registered for use under longline general
permits to attend protected species
workshops annually, (2) owners and
operators of vessels registered for use
under longline general permits to carry
and use dip nets, line clippers, and bolt
cutters, and follow handling,
resuscitation, and release requirements
for incidentally hooked or entangled sea
turtles, and (3) operators of non-longline
vessels using hooks to target pelagic
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
management unit species to follow sea
turtle handling, resuscitation, and
release requirements, as well as to
remove the maximum amount of the
gear possible from incidentally hooked
or entangled sea turtles.
In addition to recommending the
above three measures, the Western
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(WPFMC) also recommended that
NMFS include a fourth measure in this
rule to extend to all longline vessels
managed under the Pelagics FMP that
may shallow-set north of the Equator the
conservation benefits derived from the
use of circle hooks, mackerel-type bait,
and dehookers. The fourth measure also
removes incentives for owners of
Hawaii-based longline vessels to shed
their permits in favor of general permits
for the purpose of avoiding the
requirement to use circle hooks,
mackerel bait, etc., when shallowsetting north of the Equator.
Additional background on this final
rule is found in the preamble to the
proposed rule (70 FR 47777, published
August 15, 2005) and is not repeated
here.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received comments on the
proposed rule (70 FR 47777, published
August 15, 2005) from one interested
person. NMFS responds to the
comment, as follows:
Comment: The commenter supported
the requirement for vessel owners and
operators to attend protected species
workshops, and the requirement for the
owners and operators to be recertified
regularly so that their knowledge of
protected species stays current.
Response: NMFS appreciates the
support for the protected species
workshop requirement, and notes that
owners and operators must attend the
workshop annually to obtain updated
information about protected resources.
Changes to the Proposed Rule
In § 660.32, the regulatory text in
paragraph (a)(3) is corrected to clarify
that vessels affected by this paragraph
are those with freeboards of 3 ft (0.91 m)
or less. The proposed rule had
accurately referred in the preamble and
in the title of the regulatory text to
vessels with freeboards of 3 ft (0.91 m)
or less, but had inadvertently referred in
the regulatory text described the
paragraph as applying to vessels with
freeboards ‘‘greater than’’ 3 ft (0.91 m).
NMFS received no public comment on
this inadvertency.
Classification
The Administrator, Pacific Islands
Region, NMFS, determined that this rule
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 15, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69279-69282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22576]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05-05-123]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Cape Fear River, Eagle Island, North Carolina
State Port Authority Terminal, Wilmington, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone at
the North Carolina State Port Authority (NCSPA), Wilmington to include
the Cape Fear River and Eagle Island. Entry into or movement within the
security zone will be prohibited without authorization from the Captain
of the Port (COTP), Wilmingon, NC. This action is necessary to
safeguard the vessels and the facility from sabotage, subversive acts,
or other threats.
DATES: This rule is effective from October 1, 2005, until December 31,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket CGD05-05-123 and are available for
inspection or copying at the Marine Safety Unit 721 Medical Center
Drive, Suite 100, Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 between 7:30 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTJG Diego Benavides, Branch Chief,
Port Safety and Security (910) 772-2200 or toll free (877) 229-0770.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
rule. The Coast Guard is promulgating this security zone regulation to
protect NCSPA Wilmington and the
[[Page 69280]]
surrounding vicinity from threats to national security. Accordingly,
based on the military function exception set forth in the
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1), notice and comment
rulemaking and advance publication are not required for this
regulation.
Background and Purpose
Vessels frequenting the North Carolina State Port Authority (NCSPA)
Wilmington facility serve as a vital link in the transportation of
military munitions, explosives, equipment, and personnel in support of
Department of Defense missions at home and abroad. This vital
transportation link is potentially at risk to acts of terrorism,
sabotage and other criminal acts. Munitions and explosives laden
vessels also pose a unique threat to the safety and security of the
NCSPA Wilmington, vessel crews, and others in the maritime and
surrounding community should the vessels be subject to acts of
terrorism or sabotage, or other criminal acts. The ability to control
waterside access to vessels laden with munitions and explosives, as
well as those used to transport military equipment and personnel,
moored at the NCSPA Wilmington is critical to national defense and
security, as well as to the safety and security of the NCSPA
Wilmington, vessel crews, and others in the maritime and surrounding
community. Therefore, the Coast Guard is establishing this security
zone to safeguard human life, vessels and facilities from sabotage,
terrorist acts or other criminal acts.
Discussion of Rule
The security zone is necessary to provide security for, and prevent
acts of terrorism against vessels loading or offloading at the NCSPA
Wilmington facility during a military operation. It will include an
area from 800 yards south of the Cape Fear River Bridge encompassing
the southern end of Eagle Island, the Cape Fear River, and the grounds
of the State Port Authority Terminal south to South Wilmington
Terminal. The security zone will prevent access to unauthorized persons
who may attempt to enter the secure area via the Cape Fear River, the
North Carolina State Port Authority terminal, or use Eagle Island as
vantage point for surveillance of the secure area. The security zone
will protect vessels moored at the facility, their crews, others in the
maritime community and the surrounding communities from subversive or
terrorist attack that could cause serious negative impact to vessels,
the port, or the environment, and result in numerous casualties.
No person or vessel may enter or remain in the security zone at any
time without the permission of the COTP, Wilmington NC. Each person or
vessel operating within the security zone must obey any direction or
order of the COTP. The COTP may take possession and control of any
vessel in a security zone and/or remove any person, vessel, article or
thing from this security zone.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
Although this regulation restricts access to the security zone, the
effect of this regulation will not be significant because: (i) The COTP
or his or her representative may authorize access to the security zone;
(ii) the security zone will be enforced for limited duration; and (iii)
the Coast Guard will make notifications via maritime advisories so
mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of the Cape Fear River that is within the
security zone.
This security zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons.
Although the security zone will apply to the entire width of the river,
traffic will be allowed to pass through the zone with the permission of
the COTP or his or her designated representative. Before the effective
period, we will issue maritime advisories widely available to users of
the river.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the rule
will affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the address listed under
ADDRESSES.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and
[[Page 69281]]
Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. A final ``Environmental Analysis Check
List'' and a final ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C
191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-123 to read as follows: Sec. 165.T05-
123 Security Zone: Cape Fear River, Eagle Island and North Carolina
State Port Authority Terminal, Wilmington, NC.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone: The grounds of
the North Carolina State Port Authority, Wilmington Terminal and the
southern portion of Eagle Island; and an area encompassed from South
Wilmington Terminal at 34[deg]10'38.394'' N, 077[deg]57'16.248'' W
(Point 1); across Cape Fear River to Southern most entrance of
Brunswick River on the West Bank at 34[deg]10'38.052'' N,
077[deg]57'43.143'' W (Point 2); extending along the West bank of the
Brunswick River for approximately 750 yards to 34[deg]10'57.062'' N,
077[deg]58'01.342'' W (Point 3); proceeding North across the Brunswick
River to the east bank at 34[deg]11'04.846'' N, 077[deg]58'02.861'' W
(Point 4) and continuing north on the east bank for approximately 5000
yards along Eagle Island to 34[deg]13'17.815'' N, 077[deg]58'30.671'' W
(Point 5); proceeding East to 34[deg]13'19.488'' N, 077[deg]58'24.414''
W (Point 6); and then approximately 1700 yards to 34[deg]13'27.169'' N,
077[deg]57'51.753'' W (Point 7); proceeding East to 34[deg]13'21.226''
N, 077[deg]57'19.264'' W (Point 8); then across Cape Fear River to the
Northeast corner of the Colonial Terminal Pier at 34[deg]13'18.724'' N,
077[deg]57'07.401'' W (Point 9), 800 yards South of Cape Fear Memorial
Bridge; Proceeding South along shoreline (east bank) of Cape Fear River
for approximately 500 yards; Proceeding east inland to Wilmington State
Port property line at 34[deg]13'03.196'' N, 077[deg]56'52.211'' W
(Point 10); extending South along Wilmington State Port property line
to 34[deg]12'43.409'' N, 077[deg]56'50.815'' W (Point 11); Proceeding
to the North entrance of Wilmington State Port at 34[deg]12'28.854'' N,
077[deg]57'01.017'' W (Point 12); Proceeding South along Wilmington
State Port property line to 34[deg]12'20.819'' N, 077[deg]57'08.871'' W
(Point 13); Continuing South along the Wilmington State Port property
line to 34[deg]12'08.164'' N, 077[deg]57'08.530'' W (Point 14);
Continuing along State Port property to 34[deg]11'44.426'' N,
077[deg]56'55.003'' W (Point 15); Proceeding South to the main gate of
the Wilmington State Port at 34[deg]11'29.578'' N, 077[deg]56'55.240''
W (Point 16); Proceeding South approximately 750 yards to the Southeast
property corner of the Apex facility at 34[deg]11'10.936'' N,
077[deg]57'04.798'' W (Point 17); Proceeding West to East bank of Cape
Fear River at 34[deg]11'11.092'' N, 077[deg]57'17.146'' W (Point 18);
Proceeding South along East bank of Cape Fear River to Original point
of origin at 34[deg]10'38.394'' N, 077[deg]57'16.248'' W (Point 1).
(NAD 1983)
(b) Captain of the Port. Captain of the Port means the Commanding
Officer of the Marine Safety Unit Wilmington, NC, or any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized to act
on his or her behalf.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons are required to comply with the
general regulations governing security zones in 33 CFR 165.33.
(2) Persons or vessels with a need to enter or get passage within
the security zone, must first request authorization from the Captain of
the Port. The Captain of the Port's representative enforcing the zone
can be contacted on VHF marine band radio, channel 16. The Captain of
the Port can be contacted at (910) 772-2200 or toll free (877) 229-
0770.
[[Page 69282]]
(3) The operator of any vessel within this security zone must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by the
Captain of the Port or his or her designated representative.
(ii) Proceed as directed by the Captain of the Port or his or her
designated representative.
(d) Effective period. This section is effective from October 1,
2005, until December 31, 2005.
Dated: September 30, 2005.
Byron L. Black,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Commanding Officer
Marine Safety Unit Wilmington, North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 05-22576 Filed 11-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P