Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A319-100, A320-200, A321-100, and A321-200 Series Airplanes, 68384-68386 [05-22443]
Download as PDF
68384
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 217 / Thursday, November 10, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, has the
authority to approve alternative methods of
compliance for RRC gas producer rotor
assembly tie bolts addressed in this AD, if
requested, using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. The Manager, Southwest Special
Certification Office, has the authority to
approve alternative methods of compliance
for SAP gas producer rotor assembly tie bolts
addressed in this AD, if requested, using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(j) RRC Commercial Engine Bulletin (CEB)
CEB A–304, CEB A–1371, CEB A–72–4076,
TP CEB A–176, TP CEB A–1319, TP CEB A–
72–2027, Revision N/C dated May 23, 2005,
and EXTEX Service Bulletin T–090, Revision
N/C, dated May 23, 2005, pertain to the
subject of this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
November 4, 2005.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–22437 Filed 11–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22919; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–087–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A319–100, A320–200, A321–100, and
A321–200 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A319–100, A320–
200, A321–100, and A321–200 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require repetitive inspections for
corrosion in the inside and outside
lower walls of each type A, D, E, and F
lavatory wall that has at least one wallmounted cabin attendant seat, and
related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. The repetitive
inspections may be terminated by
repairing the wall with composite
material, or replacing the entire wall
with a new wall made of composite
material. This proposed AD results from
reports of corrosion in the lower part of
the lavatory walls due to water ingress.
We are proposing this AD to detect and
15:31 Nov 09, 2005
Jkt 208001
Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• By fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France.
You can examine the contents of this
AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of
the Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
This docket number is FAA–2005–
22919; the directorate identifier for this
docket is 2005–NM–087–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2141;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) None.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
correct corrosion and damage on the
lower part of the lavatory walls, which
could compromise the structural
integrity of the cabin attendant seat
attachments, and cause injury to the
cabin attendants during a crash landing.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 12,
2005.
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2005–22919; Directorate Identifier
2005–NM–087–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments submitted by the
closing date and may amend the
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of our docket
Web site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You can
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you can visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You can examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System (DMS) receives
them.
Discussion
´ ´
The Direction Generale de l’Aviation
Civile (DGAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for France,
notified us that an unsafe condition may
exist on certain Airbus Model A319–
100, A320–200, A321–100, and A321–
200 series airplanes. The DGAC advises
that an operator reported cracks in the
lavatory floor pans of the affected
airplanes in its fleet. Further
investigation showed that the cracks
resulted from corrosion in the lower
part of the lavatory wall, possibly
caused by liquid that entered during
cleaning and operation, and by rain
entering through the main entry door.
Extensive corrosion of the lower part of
the lavatory wall could compromise the
structural integrity of the cabin
attendant seat (CAS) attachments. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in injury to the cabin attendants during
a crash landing.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
A320–25–1365, dated February 18,
2005. The service bulletin describes
procedures for doing a repetitive
detailed visual inspection for corrosion
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 217 / Thursday, November 10, 2005 / Proposed Rules
and damage in the inside and outside
lower walls of each type A, D, E, and F
lavatory wall that has at least one wallmounted CAS. The service bulletin also
describes procedures for related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary, including any supporting
non-destructive testing. The related
investigative and corrective actions are
as follows:
If no corrosion is detected, the service
bulletin describes procedures for
repeating the inspection. If any
corrosion or damage is detected during
any inspection that does not exceed the
allowable limits specified in the service
bulletin, the service bulletin gives
procedures for cleaning the area with
cleaning agent, protecting against
further corrosion, operating the CAS
within specified limits, repeating the
inspection, and, within a specified
amount of time, repairing the corroded
wall.
If any corrosion or damage is detected
during any inspection that does exceed
the allowable limits specified in the
service bulletin, the service bulletin
gives procedures for repairing the wall
within a specified amount of time, and
specifies not to use the affected CAS
until the wall is repaired.
The repair depends on the extent of
damage and includes doing one of the
following, as applicable:
• Installing a temporary aluminum
repair for the existing aluminum
lavatory wall in accordance with
procedures in the service bulletin;
• Repairing the lower attachments of
the existing aluminum lavatory walls in
accordance with the lavatory
component maintenance manual
(CMM);
• Repairing the existing aluminum
lavatory wall with composite material in
accordance with the lavatory CMM (the
service bulletin specifies that no further
action is necessary after this repair); or
• Replacing the existing aluminum
lavatory wall with a composite wall in
accordance with the lavatory CMM, or
in accordance with additional Airbus
service bulletins described below, as
applicable. (The service bulletin
specifies that no further action is
necessary after this repair).
Doing the temporary aluminum repair
in accordance with the service bulletin
ends the repetitive inspections in the
service bulletin. However, the service
bulletin specifies that operators who do
the temporary aluminum repair should,
within 18 months, repair the wall with
composite material, or permanently
replace the aluminum wall with a new
wall made of composite material. For
lavatories that have the repair to the
lower attachments of the aluminum
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Nov 09, 2005
Jkt 208001
lavatory wall in accordance with the
lavatory CMM, the service bulletin
specifies that operators repeat the
detailed visual inspection until the
aluminum wall has the temporary
aluminum repair, or until it is repaired
with composite material, or until it is
permanently replaced with a new wall
made of composite material.
The service bulletin notes that the
temporary aluminum repair and the
repair to the lower attachments of the
aluminum lavatory walls can each be
done only one time. If any inspection
shows corrosion damage after the lower
attachments are repaired, the service
bulletin states that the wall must have
the temporary aluminum repair, or the
composite repair, or be replaced with a
new wall made of composite material;
as applicable to the extent of damage.
Airbus has also issued Service
Bulletin A320–25–1289, Revision 01,
dated October 29, 2003 (for lavatory A);
and Service Bulletin A320–25–1357,
dated July 19, 2004 (for lavatory F).
These service bulletins describe
procedures for replacing the existing
aluminum lavatory wall for lavatory
types A and F respectively, with a wall
made of composite material.
The compliance times for doing the
inspections and related investigative
and corrective actions described above
are summarized in Figure 1 Sheet 1 of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–25–1365,
dated February 18, 2005. The intervals
for repeating the detailed inspection are
from 15 months to 18 months
depending on previous repairs. The
compliance time specified for doing
applicable repairs ranges from 600 flight
hours to 18 months, depending on the
extent of the damage.
We have determined that
accomplishment of the actions specified
in the service information will
adequately address the unsafe
condition. The DGAC mandated the
service information and issued French
airworthiness directive F–2005–046,
dated March 16, 2005, to ensure the
continued airworthiness of these
airplanes in France.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
These airplane models are
manufactured in France and are type
certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of section
21.29 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the
applicable bilateral airworthiness
agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral
airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has
kept the FAA informed of the situation
described above. We have examined the
DGAC’s findings, evaluated all pertinent
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68385
information, and determined that we
need to issue an AD for products of this
type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the
actions specified in the service
information described previously.
Clarification of Inspection Terminology
In this proposed AD, the ‘‘detailed
visual inspection’’ specified in the
Airbus service bulletin is referred to as
a ‘‘detailed inspection.’’ We have
included the definition for a detailed
inspection in a note in the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD would affect about
393 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
proposed inspection would take about 2
work hours per lavatory, at an average
labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based
on these figures, the estimated cost of
the proposed AD for U.S. operators is
$51,090, or $130 per lavatory, per
inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
68386
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 217 / Thursday, November 10, 2005 / Proposed Rules
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the
regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2005–22919;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–087–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
must receive comments on this AD action by
December 12, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A319–
111, –112, –113, –114, –115, –131, –132, and
–133 airplanes; Model A320–211, –212, –214,
–231, –232, and –233 airplanes; Model
A321–111, –112, and –131 airplanes; and
Model A321–211 and –231 airplanes;
certificated in any category; equipped with
the lavatories in Table 1 of this AD, onto
which at least one cabin attendant seat (CAS)
is attached; except those airplanes with
lavatory walls that have not been modified
since the application of Airbus Modification
31574 in production.
TABLE 1.—LAVATORY INSTALLATIONS
AFFECTED BY THIS AD
Lavatory—
Type
Type
Type
Type
A DASELL
D DASELL
E DASELL
F DASELL
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Installed by Airbus
modification—
.............
.............
.............
.............
15:31 Nov 09, 2005
23125
22815
22819
23695
Jkt 208001
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of
corrosion in the lower part of the lavatory
walls due to water ingress. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct corrosion and
damage on the lower part of the lavatory
walls, which could compromise the
structural integrity of the CAS attachments,
and cause injury to the cabin attendants
during a crash landing.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Service Bulletin Reference
(f) For the purposes of this AD, unless
otherwise specified, the term ‘‘service
bulletin’’ means the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
25–1365, dated February 18, 2005.
Repetitive Inspections and Corrective
Actions
(g) Within 2,400 flight hours or 15 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs earlier: Do a detailed inspection for
corrosion and damage in the inside and
outside lower walls of each type A, D, E, and
F lavatory wall that has at least one wallmounted CAS, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary, including any supporting nondestructive testing and related investigative
actions. Do all actions in accordance with the
procedures and time-frames defined in the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin. Repeat the inspection at the
applicable time specified in Figure 1 Sheet 1
of the service bulletin.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
Optional Terminating Action
(h) Doing the permanent repair in
paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD
terminates the repetitive inspection
requirements of this AD.
(1) Repair the aluminum wall with
composite material in accordance with the
lavatory component maintenance manual
(CMM).
(2) Replace the aluminum wall with a new
wall made of composite material in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service bulletin
in paragraph (h)(2)(i), (h)(2)(ii), or (h)(2)(iii)
of this AD.
(i) For lavatory A: Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–25–1289, Revision 01, dated October
29, 2003.
(ii) For lavatories D and E: Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–25–1365, dated February 18,
2005, which references the lavatory CMM as
an additional source of service information
for doing the replacement.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(iii) For lavatory F: Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–25–1357, dated July 19, 2004.
Actions Accomplished in Accordance With
Previous Issue of a Service Bulletin
(i) Replacement of the lavatory A wall done
before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–25–1289, dated October 11, 2002, is
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this
AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(k) French airworthiness directive F–2005–
046, dated March 16, 2005, also addresses the
subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
31, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–22443 Filed 11–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22745; Airspace
Docket No. 05–ACE–31]
Proposed Establishment of Class E5
Airspace; Hill City, KS
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice proposes to
establish Class E5 airspace at Hill City,
KS.
DATES: Comments for inclusion in the
Rules Docket must be received on or
before November 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the Docket Management
System, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001. You must identify the
docket number FAA–2005–22745/
Airspace Docket No. 05–ACE–31, at the
beginning of your comments. You may
also submit comments on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov. You may review the
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68384-68386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22443]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-22919; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-087-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A319-100, A320-200, A321-
100, and A321-200 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Airbus Model A319-100, A320-200, A321-100, and A321-200
series airplanes. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections
for corrosion in the inside and outside lower walls of each type A, D,
E, and F lavatory wall that has at least one wall-mounted cabin
attendant seat, and related investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. The repetitive inspections may be terminated by repairing
the wall with composite material, or replacing the entire wall with a
new wall made of composite material. This proposed AD results from
reports of corrosion in the lower part of the lavatory walls due to
water ingress. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct corrosion
and damage on the lower part of the lavatory walls, which could
compromise the structural integrity of the cabin attendant seat
attachments, and cause injury to the cabin attendants during a crash
landing.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 12,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
By fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France.
You can examine the contents of this AD docket on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-
401, on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Washington, DC. This
docket number is FAA-2005-22919; the directorate identifier for this
docket is 2005-NM-087-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2141; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2005-22919;
Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-087-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments submitted by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of our
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You can review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
can visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System
(DMS) receives them.
Discussion
The Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC),
which is the airworthiness authority for France, notified us that an
unsafe condition may exist on certain Airbus Model A319-100, A320-200,
A321-100, and A321-200 series airplanes. The DGAC advises that an
operator reported cracks in the lavatory floor pans of the affected
airplanes in its fleet. Further investigation showed that the cracks
resulted from corrosion in the lower part of the lavatory wall,
possibly caused by liquid that entered during cleaning and operation,
and by rain entering through the main entry door. Extensive corrosion
of the lower part of the lavatory wall could compromise the structural
integrity of the cabin attendant seat (CAS) attachments. This
condition, if not corrected, could result in injury to the cabin
attendants during a crash landing.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-25-1365, dated February 18,
2005. The service bulletin describes procedures for doing a repetitive
detailed visual inspection for corrosion
[[Page 68385]]
and damage in the inside and outside lower walls of each type A, D, E,
and F lavatory wall that has at least one wall-mounted CAS. The service
bulletin also describes procedures for related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary, including any supporting non-
destructive testing. The related investigative and corrective actions
are as follows:
If no corrosion is detected, the service bulletin describes
procedures for repeating the inspection. If any corrosion or damage is
detected during any inspection that does not exceed the allowable
limits specified in the service bulletin, the service bulletin gives
procedures for cleaning the area with cleaning agent, protecting
against further corrosion, operating the CAS within specified limits,
repeating the inspection, and, within a specified amount of time,
repairing the corroded wall.
If any corrosion or damage is detected during any inspection that
does exceed the allowable limits specified in the service bulletin, the
service bulletin gives procedures for repairing the wall within a
specified amount of time, and specifies not to use the affected CAS
until the wall is repaired.
The repair depends on the extent of damage and includes doing one
of the following, as applicable:
Installing a temporary aluminum repair for the existing
aluminum lavatory wall in accordance with procedures in the service
bulletin;
Repairing the lower attachments of the existing aluminum
lavatory walls in accordance with the lavatory component maintenance
manual (CMM);
Repairing the existing aluminum lavatory wall with
composite material in accordance with the lavatory CMM (the service
bulletin specifies that no further action is necessary after this
repair); or
Replacing the existing aluminum lavatory wall with a
composite wall in accordance with the lavatory CMM, or in accordance
with additional Airbus service bulletins described below, as
applicable. (The service bulletin specifies that no further action is
necessary after this repair).
Doing the temporary aluminum repair in accordance with the service
bulletin ends the repetitive inspections in the service bulletin.
However, the service bulletin specifies that operators who do the
temporary aluminum repair should, within 18 months, repair the wall
with composite material, or permanently replace the aluminum wall with
a new wall made of composite material. For lavatories that have the
repair to the lower attachments of the aluminum lavatory wall in
accordance with the lavatory CMM, the service bulletin specifies that
operators repeat the detailed visual inspection until the aluminum wall
has the temporary aluminum repair, or until it is repaired with
composite material, or until it is permanently replaced with a new wall
made of composite material.
The service bulletin notes that the temporary aluminum repair and
the repair to the lower attachments of the aluminum lavatory walls can
each be done only one time. If any inspection shows corrosion damage
after the lower attachments are repaired, the service bulletin states
that the wall must have the temporary aluminum repair, or the composite
repair, or be replaced with a new wall made of composite material; as
applicable to the extent of damage.
Airbus has also issued Service Bulletin A320-25-1289, Revision 01,
dated October 29, 2003 (for lavatory A); and Service Bulletin A320-25-
1357, dated July 19, 2004 (for lavatory F). These service bulletins
describe procedures for replacing the existing aluminum lavatory wall
for lavatory types A and F respectively, with a wall made of composite
material.
The compliance times for doing the inspections and related
investigative and corrective actions described above are summarized in
Figure 1 Sheet 1 of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1365, dated
February 18, 2005. The intervals for repeating the detailed inspection
are from 15 months to 18 months depending on previous repairs. The
compliance time specified for doing applicable repairs ranges from 600
flight hours to 18 months, depending on the extent of the damage.
We have determined that accomplishment of the actions specified in
the service information will adequately address the unsafe condition.
The DGAC mandated the service information and issued French
airworthiness directive F-2005-046, dated March 16, 2005, to ensure the
continued airworthiness of these airplanes in France.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
These airplane models are manufactured in France and are type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. We have examined the DGAC's findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that we need to
issue an AD for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in the service information
described previously.
Clarification of Inspection Terminology
In this proposed AD, the ``detailed visual inspection'' specified
in the Airbus service bulletin is referred to as a ``detailed
inspection.'' We have included the definition for a detailed inspection
in a note in the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD would affect about 393 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The proposed inspection would take about 2 work hours per lavatory, at
an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the proposed AD for U.S. operators is $51,090, or
$130 per lavatory, per inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
[[Page 68386]]
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2005-22919; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-
087-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration must receive comments on
this AD action by December 12, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114,
-115, -131, -132, and -133 airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -
231, -232, and -233 airplanes; Model A321-111, -112, and -131
airplanes; and Model A321-211 and -231 airplanes; certificated in
any category; equipped with the lavatories in Table 1 of this AD,
onto which at least one cabin attendant seat (CAS) is attached;
except those airplanes with lavatory walls that have not been
modified since the application of Airbus Modification 31574 in
production.
Table 1.--Lavatory Installations Affected by This AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installed by
Lavatory-- Airbus
modification--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type A DASELL........................................ 23125
Type D DASELL........................................ 22815
Type E DASELL........................................ 22819
Type F DASELL........................................ 23695
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of corrosion in the lower part
of the lavatory walls due to water ingress. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct corrosion and damage on the lower part of the
lavatory walls, which could compromise the structural integrity of
the CAS attachments, and cause injury to the cabin attendants during
a crash landing.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Service Bulletin Reference
(f) For the purposes of this AD, unless otherwise specified, the
term ``service bulletin'' means the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1365, dated February 18, 2005.
Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions
(g) Within 2,400 flight hours or 15 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs earlier: Do a detailed inspection
for corrosion and damage in the inside and outside lower walls of
each type A, D, E, and F lavatory wall that has at least one wall-
mounted CAS, and do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary, including any supporting non-
destructive testing and related investigative actions. Do all
actions in accordance with the procedures and time-frames defined in
the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. Repeat the
inspection at the applicable time specified in Figure 1 Sheet 1 of
the service bulletin.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
Optional Terminating Action
(h) Doing the permanent repair in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of
this AD terminates the repetitive inspection requirements of this
AD.
(1) Repair the aluminum wall with composite material in
accordance with the lavatory component maintenance manual (CMM).
(2) Replace the aluminum wall with a new wall made of composite
material in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin in paragraph (h)(2)(i), (h)(2)(ii), or
(h)(2)(iii) of this AD.
(i) For lavatory A: Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1289,
Revision 01, dated October 29, 2003.
(ii) For lavatories D and E: Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-
1365, dated February 18, 2005, which references the lavatory CMM as
an additional source of service information for doing the
replacement.
(iii) For lavatory F: Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1357,
dated July 19, 2004.
Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Issue of a Service
Bulletin
(i) Replacement of the lavatory A wall done before the effective
date of this AD in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-
1289, dated October 11, 2002, is acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Related Information
(k) French airworthiness directive F-2005-046, dated March 16,
2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 31, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-22443 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P