Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 777-200 and -300 Series Airplanes, 67952-67954 [05-22306]
Download as PDF
67952
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Proposed Rules
examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious
damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of
inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror
may be necessary to ensure visual access to
all surfaces in the inspection area. This level
of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as
daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or
opening of access panels or doors. Stands,
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.’’
Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
ACTION:
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 777–200 and –300 Series
Airplanes
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 777–200 and –300
series airplanes. This proposed AD
would require inspecting the lower web
of the aft fairing of engine struts for any
discoloration and doing any related
investigative and corrective action if
necessary; inspecting the heat shield
castings for any damage and doing any
corrective action if necessary; installing
gap cover strips; and replacing
insulation blankets with new insulation
blankets. This proposed AD results from
a report that several discolored fairing
lower webs and some damaged/
deteriorated insulation blankets were
found in the aft fairings of engine struts.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
cracking of lower webs of the aft
fairings, which could result in
flammable hydraulic fluid leaking onto
or near an ignition source, and possibly
result in an uncontrollable fire in the
engine strut area.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 27,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207, for the service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Vann, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion
Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6513;
fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
Note 2: The service bulletins identified in
paragraph (g) of this AD refer to Messier
Dowty Service Bulletin 32–70SD, Revision 1,
dated July 3, 1995, as an additional source of
service information for the inspection and
corrective actions.
(h) If any crack is detected during any
inspection required by this AD and the
service information specifies to contact the
manufacturer for repair instructions: Before
further flight, repair using a method
approved by either the Manager,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the Civil
Aviation Authority (CAA) (or its delegated
agent).
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(j) British airworthiness directive G–2004–
0022, dated August 25, 2004, also addresses
the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
28, 2005.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–22305 Filed 11–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22874; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–173–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 Nov 08, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2005–22874; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–173–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
We have received a report indicating
that damaged/deteriorated thermal
insulation blankets and discolored
fairing lower webs were found in the aft
fairings of engine struts on several
Model 777–200 and –300 series
airplanes. Gaps in the segmented heat
shield in the strut aft fairings allow
engine primary/main exhaust to enter
the heat shield cavity in the strut aft
fairing. The temperature of the exhaust
that leaks into the heat shield cavity
exceeds the insulation blankets’
maximum design tolerance. Since the
insulation blankets provide thermal
protection for the aluminum fairing
lower web, degradation of an insulation
blanket allows thermal distress of the
lower web and eventually, cracking of
the lower web. A cracked lower web is
E:\FR\FM\09NOP1.SGM
09NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Proposed Rules
also a possible leak path for hydraulic
fluid to come into direct contact with
the heat shield, the temperature of
which can exceed the hydraulic fluid’s
auto-ignition temperature (750 degrees
Fahrenheit). Gaps in the heat shield, if
not corrected, could result in cracked
fairing lower webs and consequently
leak flammable hydraulic fluid onto or
near an ignition source and possibly
result in an uncontrollable fire in the
engine strut area.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777–54–
0021, dated June 23, 2005. The service
bulletin describes the following
procedures:
• Doing a general visual inspection of
the lower web of the aft fairing for any
discoloration and doing any related
investigative and corrective action if
necessary;
• Doing a general visual inspection of
the heat shield castings for any damage
(crack(s), dent(s), gouge(s), warpage, or
fretting) and doing any corrective action
if necessary;
• Installing gap cover strips; and
• Replacing insulation blankets with
new blankets.
The related investigative action is a
special detailed inspection for heat
damage and for cracks at the fastener
holes of areas with discolored paint or
primer. The corrective action is to
contact Boeing for repair instructions if
any damage is found during the
inspections.
The corrective action for any damage
found during an inspection of the heat
shield castings involves contacting
Boeing for instructions on repairing or
replacing damaged heat shields before
further flight.
Replacing the insulation blankets
with new insulation blankets may
involve modifying the configuration of
the insulation blanket velcro strips into
a new configuration if the strips were
previously installed in a particular
configuration before 1997.
Accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information is intended to
adequately address the unsafe
condition.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of this same
type design. For this reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed under
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 Nov 08, 2005
Jkt 208001
‘‘Difference Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Bulletin.’’
Difference Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Bulletin
The service bulletin specifies that you
may contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain
conditions, but this proposed AD would
require you to repair those conditions in
one of the following ways:
• Using a method that we approve; or
• Using data that meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and
that have been approved by an
Authorized Representative for the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization
Organization who has been authorized
by the FAA to make those findings.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 294 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
This proposed AD would affect about 72
airplanes of U.S. registry. The proposed
actions would take about 9 to 11 work
hours per airplane, depending on engine
manufacturer (configuration), at an
average labor rate of $65 per work hour.
Required parts would cost about
$15,368 to $16,179 per airplane. Based
on these figures, the estimated cost of
the proposed AD for U.S. operators is
$1,148,616 to $1,216,368, or $15,953 to
$16,894 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
67953
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2005–22874;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–173–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by December 27, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 777–
200 and –300 series airplanes, certificated in
any category; as identified in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777–54–0021,
dated June 23, 2005.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report that
several discolored fairing lower webs and
some damaged/deteriorated insulation
blankets were found in the aft fairings of
engine struts. We are issuing this AD to
prevent cracking of lower webs of the aft
fairings, which could result in flammable
hydraulic fluid leaking onto or near an
ignition source, and possibly result in an
uncontrollable fire in the engine strut area.
E:\FR\FM\09NOP1.SGM
09NOP1
67954
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Compliance
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection, Installation, and Replacement
Actions
(f) Except as provided by paragraph (g) of
this AD: Within 12 months after the effective
date of this AD, do the actions specified in
paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), (f)(3), and (f)(4) in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 777–54–0021, dated June 23,
2005. Do any corrective or related
investigative action before further flight in
accordance with the service bulletin.
(1) Do a general visual inspection of the
lower web of the aft fairing for any
discoloration and do any applicable related
investigative and corrective action.
(2) Do a general visual inspection of the
heat shield castings for any damage (crack(s),
dent(s), gouge(s), warpage, or fretting) and do
any applicable corrective action.
(3) Install gap cover strips on the heat
shield pans.
(4) Replace insulation blankets on the heat
shield pans with new insulation blankets.
45 CFR Part 1621
Notice of Rulemaking Workshop—
Request for Expressions of Interest in
Participation
Legal Services Corporation.
Notice of Rulemaking Workshop
and Request for Expressions of Interest
in Participation in Workshop.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
LSC is conducting a
Rulemaking Workshop in connection
with its rulemaking to consider
revisions to its regulations on client
grievance procedures at 45 CFR part
1621. LSC hereby solicits expressions of
interest in participation in the
Workshop from the regulated
community, its clients, advocates, the
organized bar and other interested
parties.
SUMMARY:
Repair Instructions
(g) If any damage, discoloration, heat
damage, or crack(s) is found during any
inspection required by this AD, and Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–54–
0021, dated June 23, 2005, specifies
contacting Boeing for appropriate action:
Before further flight, repair the damage using
a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD.
Expressions of interest must be
received by December 2, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President &
General Counsel, Legal Services
Corporation, 3333 K St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20007; (202) 295–1620
(phone); 202–337–6831 (fax) or
vfortuno@lsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
the appropriate principal inspector in the
FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding
District Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
26, 2005.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–22306 Filed 11–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 Nov 08, 2005
Jkt 208001
DATES:
The Legal
Services Corporation (‘‘LSC’’) has
initiated a rulemaking to consider
revisions to 45 CFR part 1621 (Client
Grievance Procedure). As part of this
rulemaking proceeding, LSC is
convening a Rulemaking Workshop
prior to the development of a Draft
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The
Rulemaking Workshop will be held on
January 18, 2006, from 9 a.m.–5 p.m,
EST. The Rulemaking Workshop will be
held in LSC’s Conference Center, on the
3rd floor of 3333 K St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20007.
Under the LSC Rulemaking Protocol:
Rulemaking Workshops [* * *] enable
LSC Board members and staff to meet with
stakeholders prior to the development of a
draft NPRM to discuss, but not negotiate, LSC
rules and regulations. LSC believes the
Notice and Comment process, including
Rulemaking Workshops, [* * *] allow for an
effective dialog between LSC and its
recipients and other interested parties, in
those instances in which Negotiated
Rulemaking is not used.
When the Board has decided to initiate a
rulemaking and to conduct a Rulemaking
Workshop, [LSC’s Office of Legal Affairs] will
work with the Board and staff to select a date
for the Rulemaking Workshop and will invite
participants from the interested stakeholder
community. The Workshop will be a meeting
at which the participants hold open
discussions designed to elicit information
about problems or concerns with the
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regulation (or certain aspects thereof) and
provide an opportunity for sharing ideas
regarding how to address those issues. The
Workshop is not intended [to] develop
detailed alternatives or to obtain consensus
on regulatory proposals. Upon the conclusion
of the Workshop, the Board shall provide
LSC staff with policy guidance on the issues
discussed to aid staff in the development of
the Draft Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(‘‘NPRM’’). 67 FR 69762, 69763 (November
19, 2002).
With this notice, LSC is inviting
expressions of interest from the
interested stakeholder community to
participate in the Rulemaking
Workshop. Expressions of interest
should be forwarded in writing to Victor
M. Fortuno, Vice President & General
Counsel, Legal Services Corporation,
3333 K Street, NW., Washington, DC
20007. Such expressions of interest may
be alternatively sent via e-mail to
vfortuno@lsc.gov or via fax to (202) 337–
6831, but must be received by close of
business on December 2, 2005. LSC will
select participants shortly thereafter and
will inform all those who expressed
interest of whether or not they have
been selected.
The Workshops will be open to public
observation but only persons selected
will be allowed to participate.
Participants are expected to cover their
own expenses (travel, lodging, etc.). LSC
may consider providing financial
assistance to participants for whom
travel costs would represent a
significant hardship and barrier to
participation. Any such person should
so note in his/her expression of interest
for LSC’s consideration.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President & General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05–22288 Filed 11–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050–01–P
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
45 CFR Part 1624
Notice of Rulemaking Workshop—
Request for Expressions of Interest in
Participation
Legal Services Corporation.
Notice of Rulemaking Workshop
and Request for Expressions of Interest
in Participation in Workshop.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: LSC is conducting a
Rulemaking Workshop in connection
with its rulemaking to consider
revisions to its regulations on
prohibition on discrimination on the
basis of handicap at 45 CFR part 1624.
LSC hereby solicits expressions of
interest in participation in the
Workshop from the regulated
E:\FR\FM\09NOP1.SGM
09NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 9, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67952-67954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22306]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-22874; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-173-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 777-200 and -300 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Boeing Model 777-200 and -300 series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require inspecting the lower web of the aft fairing
of engine struts for any discoloration and doing any related
investigative and corrective action if necessary; inspecting the heat
shield castings for any damage and doing any corrective action if
necessary; installing gap cover strips; and replacing insulation
blankets with new insulation blankets. This proposed AD results from a
report that several discolored fairing lower webs and some damaged/
deteriorated insulation blankets were found in the aft fairings of
engine struts. We are proposing this AD to prevent cracking of lower
webs of the aft fairings, which could result in flammable hydraulic
fluid leaking onto or near an ignition source, and possibly result in
an uncontrollable fire in the engine strut area.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 27,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for the service information identified in this
proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Vann, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone
(425) 917-6513; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2005-
22874; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-173-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System
receives them.
Discussion
We have received a report indicating that damaged/deteriorated
thermal insulation blankets and discolored fairing lower webs were
found in the aft fairings of engine struts on several Model 777-200 and
-300 series airplanes. Gaps in the segmented heat shield in the strut
aft fairings allow engine primary/main exhaust to enter the heat shield
cavity in the strut aft fairing. The temperature of the exhaust that
leaks into the heat shield cavity exceeds the insulation blankets'
maximum design tolerance. Since the insulation blankets provide thermal
protection for the aluminum fairing lower web, degradation of an
insulation blanket allows thermal distress of the lower web and
eventually, cracking of the lower web. A cracked lower web is
[[Page 67953]]
also a possible leak path for hydraulic fluid to come into direct
contact with the heat shield, the temperature of which can exceed the
hydraulic fluid's auto-ignition temperature (750 degrees Fahrenheit).
Gaps in the heat shield, if not corrected, could result in cracked
fairing lower webs and consequently leak flammable hydraulic fluid onto
or near an ignition source and possibly result in an uncontrollable
fire in the engine strut area.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-
0021, dated June 23, 2005. The service bulletin describes the following
procedures:
Doing a general visual inspection of the lower web of the
aft fairing for any discoloration and doing any related investigative
and corrective action if necessary;
Doing a general visual inspection of the heat shield
castings for any damage (crack(s), dent(s), gouge(s), warpage, or
fretting) and doing any corrective action if necessary;
Installing gap cover strips; and
Replacing insulation blankets with new blankets.
The related investigative action is a special detailed inspection
for heat damage and for cracks at the fastener holes of areas with
discolored paint or primer. The corrective action is to contact Boeing
for repair instructions if any damage is found during the inspections.
The corrective action for any damage found during an inspection of
the heat shield castings involves contacting Boeing for instructions on
repairing or replacing damaged heat shields before further flight.
Replacing the insulation blankets with new insulation blankets may
involve modifying the configuration of the insulation blanket velcro
strips into a new configuration if the strips were previously installed
in a particular configuration before 1997.
Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously, except as discussed under
``Difference Between the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin.''
Difference Between the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin
The service bulletin specifies that you may contact the
manufacturer for instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but
this proposed AD would require you to repair those conditions in one of
the following ways:
Using a method that we approve; or
Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by an Authorized Representative
for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization
Organization who has been authorized by the FAA to make those findings.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 294 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 72 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The proposed actions would take about 9 to 11 work hours
per airplane, depending on engine manufacturer (configuration), at an
average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Required parts would cost
about $15,368 to $16,179 per airplane. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the proposed AD for U.S. operators is $1,148,616 to
$1,216,368, or $15,953 to $16,894 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2005-22874; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-
173-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by December
27, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 777-200 and -300 series
airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-0021, dated June 23, 2005.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report that several discolored
fairing lower webs and some damaged/deteriorated insulation blankets
were found in the aft fairings of engine struts. We are issuing this
AD to prevent cracking of lower webs of the aft fairings, which
could result in flammable hydraulic fluid leaking onto or near an
ignition source, and possibly result in an uncontrollable fire in
the engine strut area.
[[Page 67954]]
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection, Installation, and Replacement Actions
(f) Except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD: Within 12
months after the effective date of this AD, do the actions specified
in paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), (f)(3), and (f)(4) in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777-54-0021, dated June 23, 2005. Do any corrective or
related investigative action before further flight in accordance
with the service bulletin.
(1) Do a general visual inspection of the lower web of the aft
fairing for any discoloration and do any applicable related
investigative and corrective action.
(2) Do a general visual inspection of the heat shield castings
for any damage (crack(s), dent(s), gouge(s), warpage, or fretting)
and do any applicable corrective action.
(3) Install gap cover strips on the heat shield pans.
(4) Replace insulation blankets on the heat shield pans with new
insulation blankets.
Repair Instructions
(g) If any damage, discoloration, heat damage, or crack(s) is
found during any inspection required by this AD, and Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-0021, dated June 23, 2005,
specifies contacting Boeing for appropriate action: Before further
flight, repair the damage using a method approved in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with 14 CFR
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 26, 2005.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-22306 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P