Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Extraordinary Contractual Actions, 67923-67924 [05-22106]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
concurrence of the ACO, may initiate a
special review of specific weaknesses in
the contractor’s purchasing system. See
PGI 244.304(b) for examples of
weaknesses.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
252.244–7000
[Amended]
4. Section 252.244–7000 is amended
as follows:
I a. By revising the clause date to read
‘‘(NOV 2005)’’; and
I b. In the introductory text of the
clause by removing the phrase ‘‘and
Commercial Components’’.
I
[FR Doc. 05–22105 Filed 11–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Part 250
[DFARS Case 2003–D048]
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Extraordinary
Contractual Actions
Department of Defense (DoD).
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to update text pertaining to the
processing of requests for extraordinary
contract adjustments. This rule is a
result of a transformation initiative
undertaken by DoD to dramatically
change the purpose and content of the
DFARS.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 9, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Euclides Barrera, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System,
OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132,
3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–3062. Telephone (703) 602–0296;
facsimile (703) 602–0350. Please cite
DFARS Case 2003–D048.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DFARS Transformation is a major
DoD initiative to dramatically change
the purpose and content of the DFARS.
The objective is to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of the
acquisition process, while allowing the
acquisition workforce the flexibility to
innovate. The transformed DFARS will
contain only requirements of law, DoDwide policies, delegations of FAR
authorities, deviations from FAR
requirements, and policies/procedures
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Nov 08, 2005
Jkt 208001
that have a significant effect beyond the
internal operating procedures of DoD or
a significant cost or administrative
impact on contractors or offerors.
Additional information on the DFARS
Transformation initiative is available at
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/
dfars/transformation/index.htm.
This final rule is a result of the
DFARS Transformation initiative. The
rule—
• Updates requirements for DoD
processing of requests for extraordinary
contract adjustments; and
• Deletes procedures for preparation
of records and submittal of requests to
a contract adjustment board. This text
has been relocated to the new DFARS
companion resource, Procedures,
Guidance, and Information (PGI),
available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/
dpap/dars/pgi.
DoD published a proposed rule at 70
FR 6393 on February 7, 2005. DoD
received no comments on the proposed
rule. Therefore, DoD has adopted the
proposed rule as a final rule without
change.
This rule was not subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
Executive Order 12866, dated
September 30, 1993.
250.105
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD certifies that this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule relates primarily to
DoD internal administrative procedures
for the processing of requests for
extraordinary contract adjustments.
250.303–1
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the rule does not
impose any information collection
requirements that require the approval
of the Office of Management and Budget
under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
250.305
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 250
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR Part 250 is
amended as follows:
I
PART 250—EXTRAORDINARY
CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
Part 250 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
Chapter 1.
2. Section 250.105 is revised to read
as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67923
Records.
Follow the procedures at PGI 250.105
for preparation of records.
I 3. Section 250.201–70 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) and the last
sentence of paragraph (b) introductory
text to read as follows:
250.201–70
Delegations.
(a) Military Departments. The
Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air
Force will specify delegations and levels
of authority for actions under the Act
and the Executive Order in
departmental supplements or agency
acquisition guidance.
(b) * * * The agency supplements or
agency acquisition guidance shall
specify the delegations and levels of
authority.
*
*
*
*
*
I 4. Subpart 250.3 is revised to read as
follows:
Subpart 250.3—Contract Adjustments
Sec.
250.303–1 Contractor requests.
250.305 Processing cases.
250.306 Disposition.
Contractor requests.
Requests should be filed with the
procuring contracting officer (PCO).
However, if filing with the PCO is
impractical, requests may be filed with
an authorized representative, an
administrative contracting officer, or the
Office of General Counsel of the
applicable department or agency, for
forwarding to the cognizant PCO.
Processing cases.
(1) At the time the request is filed, the
activity shall prepare the record
described at PGI 250.105(1)(i) and
forward it to the appropriate official
within 30 days after the close of the
month in which the record is prepared.
(2) The officer or official responsible
for the case shall forward to the contract
adjustment board, through departmental
channels, the documentation described
at PGI 250.305.
(3) Contract adjustment boards will
render decisions as expeditiously as
practicable. The Chair shall sign a
memorandum of decision disposing of
the case. The decision shall be dated
and shall contain the information
required by FAR 50.306. The
memorandum of decision shall not
contain any information classified
‘‘Confidential’’ or higher. The board’s
decision will be sent to the appropriate
official for implementation.
E:\FR\FM\09NOR1.SGM
09NOR1
67924
250.306
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Disposition.
For requests denied or approved
below the Secretarial level, follow the
disposition procedures at PGI 250.306.
[FR Doc. 05–22106 Filed 11–8–05; 8:45 am]
guidebook.dcma.mil/20/
guidebook_process.htm (paragraph 4.2).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–22112 Filed 11–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
48 CFR Part 252
Fish and Wildlife Service
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Technical
Amendment
50 CFR Part 17
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Final Determination
Concerning Critical Habitat for the San
Miguel Island Fox, Santa Rosa Island
Fox, Santa Cruz Island Fox, and Santa
Catalina Island Fox
RIN 1018–AT78
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: DoD is making a technical
amendment to the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement to
update the Internet address for
obtaining a list of processes accepted
under the DoD Single Process Initiative
(SPI).
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 9, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Michele Peterson, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L)
DPAP (DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3062.
Telephone (703) 602–0311; facsimile
(703) 602–0350.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 252 is
amended as follows:
I
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 252 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
Chapter 1.
2. Section 252.211–7005 is amended
by revising the clause date and the
second sentence of paragraph (b) to read
as follows:
I
252.211–7005 Substitutions for Military or
Federal Specifications and Standards.
*
*
*
*
*
SUBSTITUTIONS FOR MILITARY OR
FEDERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND
STANDARDS (NOV 2005)
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * A listing of SPI processes
accepted at specific facilities is available
via the Internet at https://
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Nov 08, 2005
Jkt 208001
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The San Miguel Island fox
(Urocyon littoralis littoralis), Santa Rosa
Island fox (U. l. santarosae), Santa Cruz
Island fox (U. l. santacruzae), and Santa
Catalina Island fox (U. l. catalinae) were
listed as endangered under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act), on March 5, 2004. We,
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, do
not find any habitat on the four islands
occupied by the foxes that meets the
definition of critical habitat under the
Act. Because there is no habitat that
meets the definition of critical habitat
for these island fox subspecies, there is
none to designate; therefore, we are not
designating any critical habitat.
DATES: This rule becomes effective on
December 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and materials
received, as well as supporting
documentation used in the preparation
of this final rule, will be available for
public inspection, by appointment,
during normal business hours, at the
Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, 2493
Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA
93003.
For
the San Miguel Island fox, Santa Rosa
Island fox, and Santa Cruz Island fox,
contact Diane Noda, Field Supervisor,
Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, at the
above address, (telephone 805/644–
1766; facsimile 805/644–3958). For the
Santa Catalina Island fox, contact Jim
Bartel, Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish
and Wildlife Office, 6010 Hidden Valley
Road, Carlsbad, CA (telephone 760/431–
9440; facsimile 760/431–9624).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Background
It is our intent to discuss only those
topics directly relevant to the
designation of critical habitat in this
rule. For more information on the four
island fox subspecies, refer to the March
5, 2004, final listing rule (69 FR 10335)
and the October 7, 2004, proposed
critical habitat rule (69 FR 60134).
Previous Federal Actions
For information on previous Federal
actions concerning the four island fox
subspecies, refer to the proposed critical
habitat rule (69 FR 60134; October 7,
2004).
Summary of Comments and
Recommendations
We requested written comments from
the public on the proposed designation
of critical habitat for four island fox
subspecies in the proposed rule (69 FR
60134; October 7, 2004). We also
contacted appropriate Federal, State,
and local agencies; scientific
organizations; and other interested
parties and invited them to comment on
the proposed rule.
During the comment period that
opened on October 7, 2004 and closed
on December 6, 2004, we received three
comments directly addressing the
proposed critical habitat designation:
two from peer reviewers and one from
a member of the public. The State of
California, where the islands on which
these subspecies live are located, did
not provide comments. The two peer
reviewers who commented generally
supported our proposal to not designate
critical habitat for the island fox
subspecies, although one thought
additional research was needed. The
other commenter opposed our proposal.
Comments received are addressed in the
following summary and incorporated
into the final rule as appropriate. We
did not receive any requests for a public
hearing.
Peer Review
In accordance with our policy
published on July 1, 1994 (59 FR
34270), we solicited expert opinions
from five knowledgeable individuals
with scientific expertise that included
familiarity with the species, the
geographic region in which the species
occurs, and conservation biology
principles. We received responses from
two of the peer reviewers. One of the
peer reviewers agreed with our
conclusion in the proposed rule that
designating critical habitat would not
confer additional benefits to the
conservation of the four island fox
subspecies. This peer reviewer’s
extensive experience with the three
E:\FR\FM\09NOR1.SGM
09NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 9, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67923-67924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22106]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Part 250
[DFARS Case 2003-D048]
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Extraordinary
Contractual Actions
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to update text pertaining to
the processing of requests for extraordinary contract adjustments. This
rule is a result of a transformation initiative undertaken by DoD to
dramatically change the purpose and content of the DFARS.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 9, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Euclides Barrera, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone (703) 602-0296;
facsimile (703) 602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2003-D048.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DFARS Transformation is a major DoD initiative to dramatically
change the purpose and content of the DFARS. The objective is to
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the acquisition process,
while allowing the acquisition workforce the flexibility to innovate.
The transformed DFARS will contain only requirements of law, DoD-wide
policies, delegations of FAR authorities, deviations from FAR
requirements, and policies/procedures that have a significant effect
beyond the internal operating procedures of DoD or a significant cost
or administrative impact on contractors or offerors. Additional
information on the DFARS Transformation initiative is available at
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/transformation/index.htm.
This final rule is a result of the DFARS Transformation initiative.
The rule--
Updates requirements for DoD processing of requests for
extraordinary contract adjustments; and
Deletes procedures for preparation of records and
submittal of requests to a contract adjustment board. This text has
been relocated to the new DFARS companion resource, Procedures,
Guidance, and Information (PGI), available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/
dpap/dars/pgi.
DoD published a proposed rule at 70 FR 6393 on February 7, 2005.
DoD received no comments on the proposed rule. Therefore, DoD has
adopted the proposed rule as a final rule without change.
This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review
under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD certifies that this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule relates primarily to DoD internal administrative
procedures for the processing of requests for extraordinary contract
adjustments.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does
not impose any information collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 250
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
0
Therefore, 48 CFR Part 250 is amended as follows:
PART 250--EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 250 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.
0
2. Section 250.105 is revised to read as follows:
250.105 Records.
Follow the procedures at PGI 250.105 for preparation of records.
0
3. Section 250.201-70 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and the last
sentence of paragraph (b) introductory text to read as follows:
250.201-70 Delegations.
(a) Military Departments. The Departments of the Army, Navy, and
Air Force will specify delegations and levels of authority for actions
under the Act and the Executive Order in departmental supplements or
agency acquisition guidance.
(b) * * * The agency supplements or agency acquisition guidance
shall specify the delegations and levels of authority.
* * * * *
0
4. Subpart 250.3 is revised to read as follows:
Subpart 250.3--Contract Adjustments
Sec.
250.303-1 Contractor requests.
250.305 Processing cases.
250.306 Disposition.
250.303-1 Contractor requests.
Requests should be filed with the procuring contracting officer
(PCO). However, if filing with the PCO is impractical, requests may be
filed with an authorized representative, an administrative contracting
officer, or the Office of General Counsel of the applicable department
or agency, for forwarding to the cognizant PCO.
250.305 Processing cases.
(1) At the time the request is filed, the activity shall prepare
the record described at PGI 250.105(1)(i) and forward it to the
appropriate official within 30 days after the close of the month in
which the record is prepared.
(2) The officer or official responsible for the case shall forward
to the contract adjustment board, through departmental channels, the
documentation described at PGI 250.305.
(3) Contract adjustment boards will render decisions as
expeditiously as practicable. The Chair shall sign a memorandum of
decision disposing of the case. The decision shall be dated and shall
contain the information required by FAR 50.306. The memorandum of
decision shall not contain any information classified ``Confidential''
or higher. The board's decision will be sent to the appropriate
official for implementation.
[[Page 67924]]
250.306 Disposition.
For requests denied or approved below the Secretarial level, follow
the disposition procedures at PGI 250.306.
[FR Doc. 05-22106 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P