Federal Transit Administration Cooperative Procurement Pilot Program, 67211-67213 [05-22058]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices
one hand, and Saltillo, Guadalajara, and
Monterrey, Mexico, on the other.
Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 05–22022 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–62–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Supplemental Draft Environmental
Impact Statement: Loudon, Anderson,
and Knox Counties, TN
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) is issuing this
notice to advise the public of its intent
to prepare a Supplemental Draft
Environmental Impact Statement in
cooperation with the Tennessee
Department of Transportation (TDOT)
for Route 475 (Knoxville Parkway) in
Loudon, Knox, and Anderson Counties,
Tennessee. This project is intended to
improve regional and national
transportation needs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Walter Boyd, P.E., Field Operations
Team Leader, Federal Highway
Administration—Tennessee Division
Office, 640 Grassmere Park Road, Suite
112, Nashville, TN 37211.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Department of Transportation Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), in
cooperation with the Tennessee
Department of Transportation (TDOT),
intends to prepare a Supplemental Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
(SDEIS) for the Route 475 (Knoxville
Parkway).
A Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) FHWA–EIS–(TN–EIS–
01–02–D) for the project was approved
and released for public review in
December 2001. The original DEIS
contained analysis of three alternative
alignments, called the Blue, Orange, and
Green Alternatives. Based on the
findings of the DEIS and comments
provided by the public, TDOT identified
the Orange Alternative as the preferred
alignment to carry forward in the Final
Environmental Impact Statement. The
proposed project corridor begins at
Interstate 75 (I–75) approximately 5.8
miles southwest of the I–40/I–75 merge
southwest of Knoxville near Lenoir City.
From this location, the corridor extends
in a northeasterly direction to I–75
approximately 3.0 miles northwest of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:35 Nov 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
the I–75/SR–61 interchange, north of
Knoxville near the City of Norris.
Since the DEIS was approved, the
alternatives development and screening
process for the Route 475 project has
continued through the Context Sensitive
Solutions (CSS) process (https://
www.knoxvilleparkway.com). The CSS
process identified two new alternatives
that follow the general alignment of the
original Orange alternative, but have
been shifted at various locations based
primarily on input from the CSS team.
Furthermore, the number and type of
access points along the corridor have
been modified on these two alternatives.
The purpose of the SDEIS is to develop
and study these two new alternatives.
Letters describing the proposed NEPA
study and soliciting input will be sent
to the appropriate Federal, State, and
local agencies that have expressed or are
known to have an interest or legal role
in this proposal. Private organizations,
citizens, and interest groups will have
an opportunity to provide input into the
development of the SDEIS and identify
issues that should be addressed. Notices
of public meetings or public hearings
will be given through various forums
providing the time and place of the
meeting along with other relevant
information. The SDEIS will be
available for public and agency review
and comment prior to the public
hearings.
To ensure that the full range of issues
related to this proposed action are
identified and taken into account,
comments and suggestions are invited
from all interested parties. Comments
and questions concerning the proposed
action and SDEIS should be directed to
FHWA at the address provided above.
Issued on: October 31, 2005.
Walter Boyd,
Field Operations Team Leader, Nashville,
Tennessee.
[FR Doc. 05–22008 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Federal Transit Administration
Cooperative Procurement Pilot
Program
AGENCY:
Federal Transit Administration,
DOT.
ACTION:
Notice; request for proposals.
SUMMARY: This notice solicits proposals
for consideration for the Cooperative
Procurement Pilot Program (CPPP).
Section 166 of the Transportation,
Treasury, and Independent Agencies
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67211
Appropriations Act, 2004 directs the
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to
establish a pilot program to determine
the benefits of encouraging cooperative
procurement of major capital
equipment. As specified in the
Appropriations Act, three pilot projects
were selected in November 2004.
Section 167 of the Transportation
Treasury, and Independent Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2005 directs the
FTA to continue the CPPP and to
expand the program to five pilot
projects. Under the CPPP, competitively
selected grantees, consortiums of
grantees, or members of the private
sector acting as agents of grantees will
develop cooperative specifications and
conduct joint procurements. For this
program, Congress has raised the
Federal share to be provided from 80
percent to 90 percent.
DATES: Proposals (2 copies) and/or
comments will be evaluated in the order
they are received and the proposing
party will receive notification of
acceptance or denial no later than 90
days after FTA receives the proposal.
ADDRESSES: Proposals and/or comments
should be submitted to Bruce Robinson,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Suite 9401,
Washington, DC 20490 or
bruce.robinson@fta.dot.gov and shall
reference CPPP.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bruce Robinson, Office of Research,
Demonstration, and Innovation, Federal
Transit Administration, (202) 366–4209,
or e-mail: bruce.robinson@fta.dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Federal Transit Administration
provides grants to State and local
government agencies to support public
transportation in communities across
America. A major portion of these funds
is used to purchase major capital
equipment (e.g., buses, vans, railcars)
used in providing public transit service.
FTA’s annual budget exceeds $7 billion,
or which more than $3 billion is
distributed by formula to more than
1,000 grantees nationwide. On average,
FTA funds more than half of the bus
purchases in any given year in the
United States. The bus industry and
FTA have promoted standard contract
terms and conditions to try to reduce
the number of individualized bus
orders. Voluntary standard technical
specifications and warranties have been
developed and promoted by FTA and
the American Public Transportation
Association. To date, none of these
efforts has reduced the use of
individualized designs and
specifications. This phenomenon also
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
67212
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices
occurs, perhaps less visibly, in the small
vehicle groups (vans) and rail vehicles
as well. The result is higher prices for
vehicles. FTA believes that, in addition
to cost savings, cooperative
procurements could ease the burden on
individual transit agencies and their
specification writers, manufacturers,
and suppliers, and promote healthy,
competitive, and predictable transit
related capital equipment markets. The
program may also serve as an
opportunity to improve the existing
standard bus procurement guidelines.
This document lays out the proposed
demonstration elements, as specified in
FTA’s 2004 Appropriations Act (Pub. L.
108–199), the benefits of the program,
the application process, the evaluation
criteria, and the technical assistance
available. In addition this notice briefly
describes the FTA report to Congress
mandated for this demonstration.
The Cooperative Procurement section
166 of Public Law 108–199 directs FTA
to conduct a Cooperative Procurement
Pilot Program. The legislation contains
specific language concerning the
purpose of the pilot program, eligible
expenses, maximum Federal share,
outreach, and reporting. A summary of
the section follows.
Section 167 of the Transportation
Treasury, and Independent Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2005 directs the
FTA to continue the CPPP and to
expand the program to five pilot
projects. Section 166 calls for the
Secretary of Transportation to conduct a
pilot of three cooperative procurements
of major capital equipment under
sections 4307 (Urban Formula grants),
5309 (Discretionary Capital grants), and
5311 (Rural Formula grants) of FTA’s
authorizing legislation. It authorizes a
90 percent Federal share for grants to
purchase major capital equipment under
this program, compared to the 80
percent otherwise authorized in sections
5307, 5309 and 5311. Title 49 of the
United States Code, chapter 53,
authorizes FTA to provide grants to
governmental agencies to promote the
provision of transit services. The full
text of section 166 is as follows:
Sec. 166. (a) In General—The
Secretary shall establish a pilot program
to determine the benefits of encouraging
cooperative procurement of major
capital equipment under sections 5307,
5309, and 5311. The program shall
consist of three pilot projects.
Cooperative procurements in these
projects may be carried out by grantees,
consortiums of grantees, or members of
the private sector acting as agents of
grantees.
(b) Federal Share—Notwithstanding
any other provision of law, the Federal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:35 Nov 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
share for a grant under this pilot
program shall be 90 percent of the net
project cost.
(c) Permissible Activities—
(1) Developing Specifications—
Cooperative specifications may be
developed either by the grantees or their
agents.
(2) Requests for Proposals—To the
extent permissible under State and local
law, cooperative procurements under
this section may be carried out, either
by the grantees or their agents, by
issuing one request for proposal for each
cooperative procurement, covering all
agencies that are participating in the
procurement.
(3) Best and Final Offers—The cost of
evaluating best and final offers either by
the grantees or their agents, is an
eligible expense under this program.
(d) Technology—To the extent
feasible, cooperative procurements
under this section shall maximize use of
Internet-based software technology
designed specifically for transit buses
and other major capital equipment to
develop specifications; aggregate
equipment requirements with other
transit agencies; generate cooperative
request for proposal packages; create
cooperative specifications; and
automate the request for approved
equals process.
(e) Eligible Expenses—The cost of the
permissible activities under (c) and
procurement under (d) are eligible
expenses under the pilot program.
(f) Proportionate Contributions—
Cooperating agencies may contribute
proportionately to the non-Federal share
of any of the eligible expenses under (e).
(g) Outreach—The Secretary shall
conduct outreach on cooperative
procurement. Under this program the
Secretary shall: (1) Offer technical
assistance to transit agencies to facilitate
the use of cooperative procurement of
major capital equipment; and (2)
conduct seminars and conferences for
grantees, nationwide, on the concept of
cooperative procurement of major
capital equipment.
(h) Report—Not later than 30 days
after delivery of the base order under
each of the pilot projects, the Secretary
shall submit to the House and Senate
Committees on Appropriations a report
on the results of that pilot project. Each
report shall evaluate any savings
realized through the cooperative
procurement and the benefits of
incorporating cooperative procurement,
as shown by that project, into the mass
transit program as a whole.
On November 16, 2004 FTA
announced the selection of the first 3
CPPP pilot projects. Theses are:
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. A consortium organized and led by
STV. This group will focus on
purchasing low floor diesel buses in 30′,
35′ and 40′ configurations.
2. The Texas Department of
Transportation. TxDOT will enter into a
requirements contract applicable to its
subgrantees and other local government
entities thoughtout the state. They will
focus on purchasing diesel cutaway
buses appropriate for rural and
paratransit applications.
3. A consortium led by the Regional
Transportation Commission of Southern
Nevada. This group expects to focus on
purchasing CNG buses in several
configurations.
Goals
FTA’s goals for the CPPP are to
develop, refine, and prove innovative
procurement practices that provide
significant benefits to the public transit
industry, including cost savings
compared to a standard procurement
(both in initial procurement costs and
operational costs over the life of the
equipment); improved efficiency of the
procurement processes; procurement
methods that are easily implemented;
decreased managerial burden on the
organization involved; and efficient use
of Interned-based software technology
in developing specifications, aggregating
equipment requirements with other
transit agencies, and generating
cooperative requests for proposal
packages.
Initial Issues
By introducing a number of
innovative procurement practices, this
program could identify and provide
significant advantages to the transit
industry. We also recognize that the
failure to consider the full effects of any
particular project could prove
disruptive to the transit industry. The
major issues related to competition are
captured in this section and proposers
are asked to address these concerns in
their proposals.
• It is important that this program not
artificially skew the bus, supplier, or
other major capital equipment markets.
Sound manufacturing and supply
markets are vital to maintaining the
availability of high quality, reasonably
priced buses and other major capital
equipment. In this program, FTA hopes
to secure the best available pricing and
quality for grantees’ major capital
equipment purchases and achieve the
best value for taxpayer dollars.
• The pilot projects ought to be
narrowly tailored (e.g., one project may
involve procurement of 40′, 102″-wide,
low-floor, clean diesel buses) toor
enhance the program’s viability and our
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices
ability to obtain realistic comparisons of
the procurement methods employed.
• Because procurements of buses and
other rolling stock often extend to five
years of requirements, many interested
transit agencies may be obligated under
the terms of existing multi-year
contracts. A transit agency obligated
under a current contract may wish to be
involved in a pilot project’s out-years.
For example, a transit agency obligated
to buy buses under a current contract for
two more years may wish to join the
project for purchases effective in year
three (assuming a five-year contract
duration under a project). If a transit
agency holds an existing option or other
right to purchase buses in the future,
participation in the CPPP might provide
better pricing that would warrant a
decision not to exercise the option. A
proposal including participants facing
this situation should explain how it will
address this issue, e.g., forego or assign
the option to other nonparticipants.
• Similarly, current practice allows
transit agencies to assign rights to
purchase buses to other transit agencies
not parties to the original contract, a
practice known in the industry as
‘‘piggybacking.’’ This practice may be
inconsistent with the concept of joint
procurement, a potential threat to the
market, or otherwise inappropriate in
this program. Proposals should address
this issue in terms of the intent to allow
or not allow assignments.
• One joint procurement model
involves designating a lead transit
agency to act as the ‘‘contracting officer’’
for all project participants, with other
participants limited to the role of
‘‘authorized purchaser’’ without
authority to change, curtail, or extend
the single contract. Another model
could have all participants in a project
cooperate in issuing specifications but
independently contract with the
supplier(s) selected according to each
transit agency’s independent analysis of
the suppliers’ proposals. CPPP
proposals should explain how this, or
other methods they propose to use,
would serve the program’s goals and the
intent of the individual project.
• Bonding and payment terms, as
well as overall risk management and
mitigation, are concerns for both transit
agencies and suppliers. This program
offers an opportunity to foster
innovative approaches to these issues
that fairly and economically allocate
risks.
• The voluntary industry bus
specification (the Standard Bus
Procurement Guidelines) funded by
FTA and issued by the American Public
Transportation Association may serve as
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:35 Nov 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
a baseline for one or more project
specifications.
Submission of Proposals
FTA solicits proposals for two pilot
CPPP projects. Proposals should present
an overview of the proposed project, a
preliminary list of the participants, the
objectives of the procurement,
technological aspects of the proposed
project, anticipated costs (not including
the purchase price of the equipment to
be procured), and a description of how
the project meets the selection criteria
below and approaches the issues
described above. Not all project
participants need be identified at the
time of the proposal; they may be added
to the project once the selection is
made.
Selection Criteria
In selecting the pilot CPPP projects,
FTA will give preference to proposals
aimed primarily at procurements of
rolling stock, but will consider
cooperative procurement proposals of
other major capital equipment as well.
FTA’s selection will be based on a
determination of how to best test
different methods of joint procurement,
so that FTA can compare and contrast
those methods and report the results to
Congress and the industry as a guide for
future procurement actions. FTA will
select the two pilot projects after
consideration of:
• Sound business planning. Proposals
should demonstrate a clear, concise
procurement plan, ordering procedures,
financial and contractual aspects of
their approach, and contract
administration techniques.
• Identification, mitigation,
management, and sharing of risk. This
includes approaches to bonding,
payment terms, warranties, and other
elements of risk that affect pricing.
• Amount and likelihood of economic
benefits. Proposals should present, to
the extent possible, projected costs
savings to be garnered through
administrative efficiencies, as well as
potential savings predicated on volume
buying.
• Administrative efficiency. This
includes streamlining efforts that assist
buyers and sellers alike.
• Innovative techniques. This
includes the use of technology to
promote efficiency and/or reduce costs
for buyers and sellers, novel approaches
to financing, maintenance, parts
supplies, or other aspects of total costs
of ownership.
• Approach to the initial issues.
Proposals should explain how they will
approach FTA’s systemic concerns
explained above.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67213
• Technical capacity. This refers to
the capacity of the proposers to
undertake and manage a joint
procurement of this nature.
Evaluation Process
FTA staff will evaluate all proposals
based on the selection criteria listed
above. We may engage in discussions
with individual proposers to further
define the pilot projects, but reserve the
right to select one or more pilot projects
based on the original submissions and
without discussions.
Program Evaluation and Reporting
Following the award of the
procurement contract(s) in each pilot
project, FTA will evaluate the
procurement process used and the
results achieved in each project, and
report the findings to Congress. FTA’s
evaluation will be based on the cost
savings compared to a standard
procurement; the improvement in the
efficiency of the procurement process;
the ease of implementing the
procurement methods; the decrease in
managerial burden on the organizations
involved; and the use of Internet-based
software technology in developing
specifications, aggregating equipment
requirements with other transit
agencies, and generating cooperative
requests for proposal packages. FTA
will use the results of this evaluation to
formulate guidance for grantees on the
use of cooperative procurement
methods. Participating entities will be
required to cooperate in the information
gathering, reporting, and outreach
processes.
Issued on: November 1, 2005.
Jennifer L. Dorn,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–22058 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Docket No. AB–1081X] 1
San Pedro Railroad Operating
Company, LLC—Abandonment
Exemption—in Cochise County, AZ
On October 17, 2005, San Pedro
Railroad Operating Company, LLC
1 This filing is a resubmission of a petition for
exemption previously filed on June 6, 2005,
wherein SPROC sought authorization to abandon
the above lines. See San Pedro Railroad Operating
Company, LLC—Abandonment Exemption—in
Cochise County, AZ, STB Docket No. AB–441 (SubNo. 4X). Notice of the filing was served and
published in the Federal Register on June 24, 2005
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
Continued
04NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67211-67213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22058]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Federal Transit Administration Cooperative Procurement Pilot
Program
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice; request for proposals.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice solicits proposals for consideration for the
Cooperative Procurement Pilot Program (CPPP). Section 166 of the
Transportation, Treasury, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act,
2004 directs the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to establish a
pilot program to determine the benefits of encouraging cooperative
procurement of major capital equipment. As specified in the
Appropriations Act, three pilot projects were selected in November
2004. Section 167 of the Transportation Treasury, and Independent
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2005 directs the FTA to continue the CPPP
and to expand the program to five pilot projects. Under the CPPP,
competitively selected grantees, consortiums of grantees, or members of
the private sector acting as agents of grantees will develop
cooperative specifications and conduct joint procurements. For this
program, Congress has raised the Federal share to be provided from 80
percent to 90 percent.
DATES: Proposals (2 copies) and/or comments will be evaluated in the
order they are received and the proposing party will receive
notification of acceptance or denial no later than 90 days after FTA
receives the proposal.
ADDRESSES: Proposals and/or comments should be submitted to Bruce
Robinson, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Suite 9401, Washington, DC 20490 or
bruce.robinson@fta.dot.gov and shall reference CPPP.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Robinson, Office of Research,
Demonstration, and Innovation, Federal Transit Administration, (202)
366-4209, or e-mail: bruce.robinson@fta.dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Federal Transit Administration provides grants to State and
local government agencies to support public transportation in
communities across America. A major portion of these funds is used to
purchase major capital equipment (e.g., buses, vans, railcars) used in
providing public transit service. FTA's annual budget exceeds $7
billion, or which more than $3 billion is distributed by formula to
more than 1,000 grantees nationwide. On average, FTA funds more than
half of the bus purchases in any given year in the United States. The
bus industry and FTA have promoted standard contract terms and
conditions to try to reduce the number of individualized bus orders.
Voluntary standard technical specifications and warranties have been
developed and promoted by FTA and the American Public Transportation
Association. To date, none of these efforts has reduced the use of
individualized designs and specifications. This phenomenon also
[[Page 67212]]
occurs, perhaps less visibly, in the small vehicle groups (vans) and
rail vehicles as well. The result is higher prices for vehicles. FTA
believes that, in addition to cost savings, cooperative procurements
could ease the burden on individual transit agencies and their
specification writers, manufacturers, and suppliers, and promote
healthy, competitive, and predictable transit related capital equipment
markets. The program may also serve as an opportunity to improve the
existing standard bus procurement guidelines.
This document lays out the proposed demonstration elements, as
specified in FTA's 2004 Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 108-199), the
benefits of the program, the application process, the evaluation
criteria, and the technical assistance available. In addition this
notice briefly describes the FTA report to Congress mandated for this
demonstration.
The Cooperative Procurement section 166 of Public Law 108-199
directs FTA to conduct a Cooperative Procurement Pilot Program. The
legislation contains specific language concerning the purpose of the
pilot program, eligible expenses, maximum Federal share, outreach, and
reporting. A summary of the section follows.
Section 167 of the Transportation Treasury, and Independent
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2005 directs the FTA to continue the CPPP
and to expand the program to five pilot projects. Section 166 calls for
the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a pilot of three cooperative
procurements of major capital equipment under sections 4307 (Urban
Formula grants), 5309 (Discretionary Capital grants), and 5311 (Rural
Formula grants) of FTA's authorizing legislation. It authorizes a 90
percent Federal share for grants to purchase major capital equipment
under this program, compared to the 80 percent otherwise authorized in
sections 5307, 5309 and 5311. Title 49 of the United States Code,
chapter 53, authorizes FTA to provide grants to governmental agencies
to promote the provision of transit services. The full text of section
166 is as follows:
Sec. 166. (a) In General--The Secretary shall establish a pilot
program to determine the benefits of encouraging cooperative
procurement of major capital equipment under sections 5307, 5309, and
5311. The program shall consist of three pilot projects. Cooperative
procurements in these projects may be carried out by grantees,
consortiums of grantees, or members of the private sector acting as
agents of grantees.
(b) Federal Share--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the
Federal share for a grant under this pilot program shall be 90 percent
of the net project cost.
(c) Permissible Activities--
(1) Developing Specifications--Cooperative specifications may be
developed either by the grantees or their agents.
(2) Requests for Proposals--To the extent permissible under State
and local law, cooperative procurements under this section may be
carried out, either by the grantees or their agents, by issuing one
request for proposal for each cooperative procurement, covering all
agencies that are participating in the procurement.
(3) Best and Final Offers--The cost of evaluating best and final
offers either by the grantees or their agents, is an eligible expense
under this program.
(d) Technology--To the extent feasible, cooperative procurements
under this section shall maximize use of Internet-based software
technology designed specifically for transit buses and other major
capital equipment to develop specifications; aggregate equipment
requirements with other transit agencies; generate cooperative request
for proposal packages; create cooperative specifications; and automate
the request for approved equals process.
(e) Eligible Expenses--The cost of the permissible activities under
(c) and procurement under (d) are eligible expenses under the pilot
program.
(f) Proportionate Contributions--Cooperating agencies may
contribute proportionately to the non-Federal share of any of the
eligible expenses under (e).
(g) Outreach--The Secretary shall conduct outreach on cooperative
procurement. Under this program the Secretary shall: (1) Offer
technical assistance to transit agencies to facilitate the use of
cooperative procurement of major capital equipment; and (2) conduct
seminars and conferences for grantees, nationwide, on the concept of
cooperative procurement of major capital equipment.
(h) Report--Not later than 30 days after delivery of the base order
under each of the pilot projects, the Secretary shall submit to the
House and Senate Committees on Appropriations a report on the results
of that pilot project. Each report shall evaluate any savings realized
through the cooperative procurement and the benefits of incorporating
cooperative procurement, as shown by that project, into the mass
transit program as a whole.
On November 16, 2004 FTA announced the selection of the first 3
CPPP pilot projects. Theses are:
1. A consortium organized and led by STV. This group will focus on
purchasing low floor diesel buses in 30', 35' and 40' configurations.
2. The Texas Department of Transportation. TxDOT will enter into a
requirements contract applicable to its subgrantees and other local
government entities thoughtout the state. They will focus on purchasing
diesel cutaway buses appropriate for rural and paratransit
applications.
3. A consortium led by the Regional Transportation Commission of
Southern Nevada. This group expects to focus on purchasing CNG buses in
several configurations.
Goals
FTA's goals for the CPPP are to develop, refine, and prove
innovative procurement practices that provide significant benefits to
the public transit industry, including cost savings compared to a
standard procurement (both in initial procurement costs and operational
costs over the life of the equipment); improved efficiency of the
procurement processes; procurement methods that are easily implemented;
decreased managerial burden on the organization involved; and efficient
use of Interned-based software technology in developing specifications,
aggregating equipment requirements with other transit agencies, and
generating cooperative requests for proposal packages.
Initial Issues
By introducing a number of innovative procurement practices, this
program could identify and provide significant advantages to the
transit industry. We also recognize that the failure to consider the
full effects of any particular project could prove disruptive to the
transit industry. The major issues related to competition are captured
in this section and proposers are asked to address these concerns in
their proposals.
It is important that this program not artificially skew
the bus, supplier, or other major capital equipment markets. Sound
manufacturing and supply markets are vital to maintaining the
availability of high quality, reasonably priced buses and other major
capital equipment. In this program, FTA hopes to secure the best
available pricing and quality for grantees' major capital equipment
purchases and achieve the best value for taxpayer dollars.
The pilot projects ought to be narrowly tailored (e.g.,
one project may involve procurement of 40', 102''-wide, low-floor,
clean diesel buses) toor enhance the program's viability and our
[[Page 67213]]
ability to obtain realistic comparisons of the procurement methods
employed.
Because procurements of buses and other rolling stock
often extend to five years of requirements, many interested transit
agencies may be obligated under the terms of existing multi-year
contracts. A transit agency obligated under a current contract may wish
to be involved in a pilot project's out-years. For example, a transit
agency obligated to buy buses under a current contract for two more
years may wish to join the project for purchases effective in year
three (assuming a five-year contract duration under a project). If a
transit agency holds an existing option or other right to purchase
buses in the future, participation in the CPPP might provide better
pricing that would warrant a decision not to exercise the option. A
proposal including participants facing this situation should explain
how it will address this issue, e.g., forego or assign the option to
other nonparticipants.
Similarly, current practice allows transit agencies to
assign rights to purchase buses to other transit agencies not parties
to the original contract, a practice known in the industry as
``piggybacking.'' This practice may be inconsistent with the concept of
joint procurement, a potential threat to the market, or otherwise
inappropriate in this program. Proposals should address this issue in
terms of the intent to allow or not allow assignments.
One joint procurement model involves designating a lead
transit agency to act as the ``contracting officer'' for all project
participants, with other participants limited to the role of
``authorized purchaser'' without authority to change, curtail, or
extend the single contract. Another model could have all participants
in a project cooperate in issuing specifications but independently
contract with the supplier(s) selected according to each transit
agency's independent analysis of the suppliers' proposals. CPPP
proposals should explain how this, or other methods they propose to
use, would serve the program's goals and the intent of the individual
project.
Bonding and payment terms, as well as overall risk
management and mitigation, are concerns for both transit agencies and
suppliers. This program offers an opportunity to foster innovative
approaches to these issues that fairly and economically allocate risks.
The voluntary industry bus specification (the Standard Bus
Procurement Guidelines) funded by FTA and issued by the American Public
Transportation Association may serve as a baseline for one or more
project specifications.
Submission of Proposals
FTA solicits proposals for two pilot CPPP projects. Proposals
should present an overview of the proposed project, a preliminary list
of the participants, the objectives of the procurement, technological
aspects of the proposed project, anticipated costs (not including the
purchase price of the equipment to be procured), and a description of
how the project meets the selection criteria below and approaches the
issues described above. Not all project participants need be identified
at the time of the proposal; they may be added to the project once the
selection is made.
Selection Criteria
In selecting the pilot CPPP projects, FTA will give preference to
proposals aimed primarily at procurements of rolling stock, but will
consider cooperative procurement proposals of other major capital
equipment as well. FTA's selection will be based on a determination of
how to best test different methods of joint procurement, so that FTA
can compare and contrast those methods and report the results to
Congress and the industry as a guide for future procurement actions.
FTA will select the two pilot projects after consideration of:
Sound business planning. Proposals should demonstrate a
clear, concise procurement plan, ordering procedures, financial and
contractual aspects of their approach, and contract administration
techniques.
Identification, mitigation, management, and sharing of
risk. This includes approaches to bonding, payment terms, warranties,
and other elements of risk that affect pricing.
Amount and likelihood of economic benefits. Proposals
should present, to the extent possible, projected costs savings to be
garnered through administrative efficiencies, as well as potential
savings predicated on volume buying.
Administrative efficiency. This includes streamlining
efforts that assist buyers and sellers alike.
Innovative techniques. This includes the use of technology
to promote efficiency and/or reduce costs for buyers and sellers, novel
approaches to financing, maintenance, parts supplies, or other aspects
of total costs of ownership.
Approach to the initial issues. Proposals should explain
how they will approach FTA's systemic concerns explained above.
Technical capacity. This refers to the capacity of the
proposers to undertake and manage a joint procurement of this nature.
Evaluation Process
FTA staff will evaluate all proposals based on the selection
criteria listed above. We may engage in discussions with individual
proposers to further define the pilot projects, but reserve the right
to select one or more pilot projects based on the original submissions
and without discussions.
Program Evaluation and Reporting
Following the award of the procurement contract(s) in each pilot
project, FTA will evaluate the procurement process used and the results
achieved in each project, and report the findings to Congress. FTA's
evaluation will be based on the cost savings compared to a standard
procurement; the improvement in the efficiency of the procurement
process; the ease of implementing the procurement methods; the decrease
in managerial burden on the organizations involved; and the use of
Internet-based software technology in developing specifications,
aggregating equipment requirements with other transit agencies, and
generating cooperative requests for proposal packages. FTA will use the
results of this evaluation to formulate guidance for grantees on the
use of cooperative procurement methods. Participating entities will be
required to cooperate in the information gathering, reporting, and
outreach processes.
Issued on: November 1, 2005.
Jennifer L. Dorn,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-22058 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-M