Walnuts Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate, 67096-67098 [05-22047]
Download as PDF
67096
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 213
Friday, November 4, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Docket No. FV05–984–2 PR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Walnut Marketing Board (Board) for the
2005–06 and subsequent fiscal periods
from $0.0094 to $0.0096 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The Board locally administers
the marketing order which regulates the
handling of walnuts grown in
California. Assessments upon walnut
handlers are used by the Board to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of
the program. The marketing year began
August 1 and ends July 31. The
assessment rate would remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by
November 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202)
720–8938, E-mail:
moab.docketclerk@usda.gov. Comments
should reference the docket number and
the date and page number of this issue
of the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shereen Marino, Marketing Specialist,
California Marketing Field Office, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:34 Nov 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
Telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559)
487–5906; or George Kelhart, Technical
Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938. Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 984, both as amended (7
CFR part 984), regulating the handling
of walnuts grown in California,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, California walnut handlers are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as proposed herein
would be applicable to all assessable
walnuts beginning on August 1, 2005,
and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Board for the 2005–06 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $0.0094 to $0.0096
per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts.
The California walnut marketing
order provides authority for the Board,
with the approval of USDA, to formulate
an annual budget of expenses and
collect assessments from handlers to
administer the program. The members
of the Board are producers and handlers
of California walnuts. They are familiar
with the Board’s needs and the costs for
goods and services in their local area
and are thus in a position to formulate
an appropriate budget and assessment
rate. The assessment rate is formulated
and discussed at a public meeting.
Thus, all directly affected persons have
an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2004–05 and subsequent fiscal
periods, the Board recommended, and
USDA approved, an assessment rate of
$0.0094 per kernelweight of assessable
walnuts that would continue in effect
from year to year unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on September 9, 2005,
and unanimously recommended 2005–
06 expenditures of $2,937,600 and an
assessment rate of $0.0096 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. In comparison, last year’s
budgeted expenditures were $2,749,500.
The assessment rate of $0.0096 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts is $0.0002 per pound higher
than the rate currently in effect. The
increased assessment rate is necessary
because this year’s crop is estimated by
the California Agricultural Statistics
Service (CASS) to be 340,000 tons
(306,000,000 kernelweight pounds
merchantable), and the budget is about
6.4 percent more than last year’s budget.
The crop is smaller than expected due
to sunburn caused by warmer than
E:\FR\FM\04NOP1.SGM
04NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
normal temperatures during the growing
season. The higher assessment rate
should generate sufficient income to
cover anticipated 2005–06 expenses.
The following table compares major
budget expenditures recommended by
the Board for the 2004–05 and 2005–06
marketing years:
Budget expense categories
2004–05
Administrative Staff/Field Salaries & Benefits .........................................................................................................
Travel/Board Expenses ...........................................................................................................................................
Office Costs/Annual Audit ........................................................................................................................................
Program Expenses Including Research Controlled Purchases ..............................................................................
Crop Acreage Survey ..............................................................................................................................................
Crop Estimate ..........................................................................................................................................................
Production Research Director .................................................................................................................................
Production Research ...............................................................................................................................................
Domestic Market Development ...............................................................................................................................
Reserve for Contingency .........................................................................................................................................
$332,000
69,000
124,000
5,000
........................
94,000
76,500
548,500
1,393,500
107,000
The assessment rate recommended by
the Board was derived by dividing
anticipated expenses by expected
shipments of California walnuts
certified as merchantable. Merchantable
shipments for the year are estimated at
306,000,000 kernelweight pounds
which should provide $2,937,600 in
assessment income and allow the Board
to cover its expenses. Unexpended
funds may be used temporarily to defray
expenses of the subsequent marketing
year, but must be made available to the
handlers from whom collected within 5
months after the end of the year,
according to § 984.69.
The proposed assessment rate would
continue in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the Board or
other available information.
Although this assessment rate would
be in effect for an indefinite period, the
Board would continue to meet prior to
or during each marketing year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Board meetings are
available from the Board or USDA.
Board meetings are open to the public
and interested persons may express
their views at these meetings. USDA
would evaluate Board recommendations
and other available information to
determine whether modification of the
assessment rate is needed. Further
rulemaking would be undertaken as
necessary. The Board’s 2005–06 budget
and those for subsequent fiscal periods
would be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:34 Nov 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
67097
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 50 handlers
of California walnuts subject to
regulation under the marketing order
and approximately 5,500 growers in the
production area. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those whose annual receipts
are less than $6,000,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $750,000.
Current industry information shows
that 15 of the 50 handlers (30 percent)
shipped over $6,000,000 of
merchantable walnuts and could be
considered large handlers by the Small
Business Administration. Thirty-five of
the 50 walnut handlers (70 percent)
shipped under $6,000,000 of
merchantable walnuts and could be
considered small handlers.
The number of large walnut growers
(annual walnut revenue greater than
$750,000) can be estimated as follows.
According to the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS), the average
yield per acre for 2002–04 is 1.457 tons.
A grower with 420 acres would produce
approximately 612 tons. The average of
grower prices for 2002–04 (published by
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2005–06
$360,000
80,000
132,500
5,000
85,000
95,000
75,000
500,000
1,550,000
55,100
NASS) is $1,227 per ton. At that average
price, the 612 tons produced on 420
acres would yield approximately
$750,000 in annual revenue. The 2002
Agricultural Census indicated 56
percent of walnut farms were 500 acres
or larger, which is close to the 420 acres
required to produce $750,000 in
revenue. Thus, it can be concluded that
the number of large walnut farms in
2005 is still likely to be under one
percent. Based on the foregoing, it can
be concluded that the majority of
California walnut handlers and
producers may be classified as small
entities.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Board and collected from handlers for
the 2005–06 and subsequent marketing
years from $0.0094 per kernelweight
pound of assessable walnuts to $0.0096
per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The Board unanimously
recommended 2005–06 expenditures of
$2,937,600 and an assessment rate of
$0.0096 per kernelweight pound of
assessable walnuts. The proposed
assessment rate of $0.0096 is $0.0002
higher than the rate currently in effect.
The quantity of assessable walnuts for
the 2005–06 marketing year is estimated
at 340,000 tons. Thus, the $0.0096 rate
should provide $2,937,600 in
assessment income and be adequate to
meet this year’s expenses. The increased
assessment rate is primarily due to
increased budget expenditures and
based on an estimated crop of 340,000
tons for the year (306,000,000
kernelweight pounds estimated
merchantable).
The following table compares major
budget expenditures recommended by
the Board for the 2004–05 and 2005–06
fiscal years:
E:\FR\FM\04NOP1.SGM
04NOP1
67098
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Budget expense categories
2004–05
Administrative Staff/Field Salaries & Benefits .........................................................................................................
Travel/Board Expenses ...........................................................................................................................................
Office Costs/Annual Audit ........................................................................................................................................
Program Expenses Including Research Controlled Purchases ..............................................................................
Crop Acreage Survey ..............................................................................................................................................
Crop Estimate ..........................................................................................................................................................
Production Research Director .................................................................................................................................
Production Research ...............................................................................................................................................
Domestic Market Development ...............................................................................................................................
Reserve for Contingency .........................................................................................................................................
$332,000
69,000
124,000
5,000
........................
94,000
76,500
548,500
1,393,500
107,000
The Board reviewed and unanimously
recommended 2005–06 expenditures of
$2,937,600, which included an increase
in audit expenses. Prior to arriving at
this budget, the Board considered
alternative expenditure levels, but
ultimately decided that the
recommended levels were reasonable to
properly administer the order. The
assessment rate recommended by the
Board was derived by dividing
anticipated expenses by expected
shipments of California walnuts
certified as merchantable. Merchantable
shipments for the year are estimated at
306,000,000 kernelweight pounds
which should provide $2,937,600 in
assessment income and allow the Board
to cover its expenses. Unexpended
funds may be used temporarily to defray
expenses of the subsequent marketing
year, but must be made available to the
handlers from whom collected within 5
months after the end of the year,
according to § 984.69.
According to NASS, the season
average grower prices for years 2003 and
2004 were $1,160 and $1,350 per ton
respectively. Dividing these average
grower prices by 2,000 pounds per ton
provides an inshell price per pound
range of between $.58 and $.68.
Adjusting by a few cents above and
below those prices ($0.55 to $0.70 per
inshell pound) provides a reasonable
price range within which the 2005–06
season average price is likely to fall.
Dividing these inshell prices per pound
by the 0.45 conversion factor designated
in the order yields a 2005–06 price
range estimate of $1.22 and $1.56 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts.
To calculate the percentage of grower
revenue represented by the assessment
rate, the assessment rate of $0.0096 (per
kernelweight pound) is divided into the
low and high estimates of the price
range. The estimated assessment
revenue for the 2005–06 marketing year
as a percentage of total grower revenue
would likely range between .8 and .6
percent.
This action would increase the
assessment obligation imposed on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:34 Nov 03, 2005
Jkt 208001
handlers. While assessments impose
some additional costs on handlers, the
costs are minimal and uniform on all
handlers. Some of the additional costs
may be passed on to producers.
However, these costs would be offset by
the benefits derived by the operation of
the marketing order. In addition, the
Board’s meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California walnut
industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Board deliberations on all
issues. Like all Board meetings, the
September 9, 2005, meeting was a
public meeting and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express
views on this issue. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit
information on the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
This proposed rule would impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
California walnut handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
A 10-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. Ten days is
deemed appropriate because: (1) The
2005–06 marketing year began on
August 1, 2005, and the marketing order
requires that the rate of assessment for
each year apply to all assessable
walnuts handled during the year; (2) the
Board needs to have sufficient funds to
pay its expenses which are incurred on
a continuous basis and; (3) handlers are
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2005–06
$360,000
80,000
132,500
5,000
85,000
95,000
75,000
500,000
1,550,000
55,100
aware of this action which was
unanimously recommended by the
Board at a public meeting and is similar
to other assessment rate actions issued
in past years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Walnuts, Marketing agreements, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 984 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 984.347 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 984.347
Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2005, an
assessment rate of $0.0096 per
kernelweight pound is established for
California merchantable walnuts.
Dated: October 31, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–22047 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 63
RIN 3150–AH68
Implementation of a Dose Standard
After 10,000 Years; Extension of
Comment Period
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule: Extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On September 8, 2005 (70 FR
53313), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) published for public
comment a proposed rule that would
E:\FR\FM\04NOP1.SGM
04NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67096-67098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22047]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 67096]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Docket No. FV05-984-2 PR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the assessment rate established for
the Walnut Marketing Board (Board) for the 2005-06 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $0.0094 to $0.0096 per kernelweight pound of
assessable walnuts. The Board locally administers the marketing order
which regulates the handling of walnuts grown in California.
Assessments upon walnut handlers are used by the Board to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The marketing year
began August 1 and ends July 31. The assessment rate would remain in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by November 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov.
Comments should reference the docket number and the date and page
number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be available for
public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/
moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shereen Marino, Marketing Specialist,
California Marketing Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS,
USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906; or George
Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch,
Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax:
(202) 720-8938. Small businesses may request information on complying
with this regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 984, both as amended (7 CFR part 984),
regulating the handling of walnuts grown in California, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California
walnut handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as proposed herein would be applicable to all
assessable walnuts beginning on August 1, 2005, and continue until
amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State
or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Board for the 2005-06 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.0094 to
$0.0096 per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts.
The California walnut marketing order provides authority for the
Board, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the
program. The members of the Board are producers and handlers of
California walnuts. They are familiar with the Board's needs and the
costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and discussed at a public meeting. Thus,
all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2004-05 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Board
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate of $0.0094 per
kernelweight of assessable walnuts that would continue in effect from
year to year unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon
recommendation and information submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on September 9, 2005, and unanimously recommended
2005-06 expenditures of $2,937,600 and an assessment rate of $0.0096
per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts. In comparison, last
year's budgeted expenditures were $2,749,500. The assessment rate of
$0.0096 per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts is $0.0002 per
pound higher than the rate currently in effect. The increased
assessment rate is necessary because this year's crop is estimated by
the California Agricultural Statistics Service (CASS) to be 340,000
tons (306,000,000 kernelweight pounds merchantable), and the budget is
about 6.4 percent more than last year's budget. The crop is smaller
than expected due to sunburn caused by warmer than
[[Page 67097]]
normal temperatures during the growing season. The higher assessment
rate should generate sufficient income to cover anticipated 2005-06
expenses.
The following table compares major budget expenditures recommended
by the Board for the 2004-05 and 2005-06 marketing years:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget expense categories 2004-05 2005-06
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Staff/Field Salaries & $332,000 $360,000
Benefits...............................
Travel/Board Expenses................... 69,000 80,000
Office Costs/Annual Audit............... 124,000 132,500
Program Expenses Including Research 5,000 5,000
Controlled Purchases...................
Crop Acreage Survey..................... .............. 85,000
Crop Estimate........................... 94,000 95,000
Production Research Director............ 76,500 75,000
Production Research..................... 548,500 500,000
Domestic Market Development............. 1,393,500 1,550,000
Reserve for Contingency................. 107,000 55,100
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The assessment rate recommended by the Board was derived by
dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of California
walnuts certified as merchantable. Merchantable shipments for the year
are estimated at 306,000,000 kernelweight pounds which should provide
$2,937,600 in assessment income and allow the Board to cover its
expenses. Unexpended funds may be used temporarily to defray expenses
of the subsequent marketing year, but must be made available to the
handlers from whom collected within 5 months after the end of the year,
according to Sec. 984.69.
The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation
and information submitted by the Board or other available information.
Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Board would continue to meet prior to or during each
marketing year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Board meetings are available from the Board or USDA. Board
meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express
their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate Board
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would
be undertaken as necessary. The Board's 2005-06 budget and those for
subsequent fiscal periods would be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 50 handlers of California walnuts subject
to regulation under the marketing order and approximately 5,500 growers
in the production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those whose
annual receipts are less than $6,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$750,000.
Current industry information shows that 15 of the 50 handlers (30
percent) shipped over $6,000,000 of merchantable walnuts and could be
considered large handlers by the Small Business Administration. Thirty-
five of the 50 walnut handlers (70 percent) shipped under $6,000,000 of
merchantable walnuts and could be considered small handlers.
The number of large walnut growers (annual walnut revenue greater
than $750,000) can be estimated as follows. According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), the average yield per acre for
2002-04 is 1.457 tons. A grower with 420 acres would produce
approximately 612 tons. The average of grower prices for 2002-04
(published by NASS) is $1,227 per ton. At that average price, the 612
tons produced on 420 acres would yield approximately $750,000 in annual
revenue. The 2002 Agricultural Census indicated 56 percent of walnut
farms were 500 acres or larger, which is close to the 420 acres
required to produce $750,000 in revenue. Thus, it can be concluded that
the number of large walnut farms in 2005 is still likely to be under
one percent. Based on the foregoing, it can be concluded that the
majority of California walnut handlers and producers may be classified
as small entities.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Board and collected from handlers for the 2005-06 and subsequent
marketing years from $0.0094 per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts to $0.0096 per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts. The
Board unanimously recommended 2005-06 expenditures of $2,937,600 and an
assessment rate of $0.0096 per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The proposed assessment rate of $0.0096 is $0.0002 higher than
the rate currently in effect. The quantity of assessable walnuts for
the 2005-06 marketing year is estimated at 340,000 tons. Thus, the
$0.0096 rate should provide $2,937,600 in assessment income and be
adequate to meet this year's expenses. The increased assessment rate is
primarily due to increased budget expenditures and based on an
estimated crop of 340,000 tons for the year (306,000,000 kernelweight
pounds estimated merchantable).
The following table compares major budget expenditures recommended
by the Board for the 2004-05 and 2005-06 fiscal years:
[[Page 67098]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget expense categories 2004-05 2005-06
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Staff/Field Salaries & $332,000 $360,000
Benefits...............................
Travel/Board Expenses................... 69,000 80,000
Office Costs/Annual Audit............... 124,000 132,500
Program Expenses Including Research 5,000 5,000
Controlled Purchases...................
Crop Acreage Survey..................... .............. 85,000
Crop Estimate........................... 94,000 95,000
Production Research Director............ 76,500 75,000
Production Research..................... 548,500 500,000
Domestic Market Development............. 1,393,500 1,550,000
Reserve for Contingency................. 107,000 55,100
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board reviewed and unanimously recommended 2005-06 expenditures
of $2,937,600, which included an increase in audit expenses. Prior to
arriving at this budget, the Board considered alternative expenditure
levels, but ultimately decided that the recommended levels were
reasonable to properly administer the order. The assessment rate
recommended by the Board was derived by dividing anticipated expenses
by expected shipments of California walnuts certified as merchantable.
Merchantable shipments for the year are estimated at 306,000,000
kernelweight pounds which should provide $2,937,600 in assessment
income and allow the Board to cover its expenses. Unexpended funds may
be used temporarily to defray expenses of the subsequent marketing
year, but must be made available to the handlers from whom collected
within 5 months after the end of the year, according to Sec. 984.69.
According to NASS, the season average grower prices for years 2003
and 2004 were $1,160 and $1,350 per ton respectively. Dividing these
average grower prices by 2,000 pounds per ton provides an inshell price
per pound range of between $.58 and $.68. Adjusting by a few cents
above and below those prices ($0.55 to $0.70 per inshell pound)
provides a reasonable price range within which the 2005-06 season
average price is likely to fall. Dividing these inshell prices per
pound by the 0.45 conversion factor designated in the order yields a
2005-06 price range estimate of $1.22 and $1.56 per kernelweight pound
of assessable walnuts.
To calculate the percentage of grower revenue represented by the
assessment rate, the assessment rate of $0.0096 (per kernelweight
pound) is divided into the low and high estimates of the price range.
The estimated assessment revenue for the 2005-06 marketing year as a
percentage of total grower revenue would likely range between .8 and .6
percent.
This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
would be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the
marketing order. In addition, the Board's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California walnut industry and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Board
deliberations on all issues. Like all Board meetings, the September 9,
2005, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit information on the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on small businesses.
This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California walnut
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 10-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposed rule. Ten days is deemed appropriate because:
(1) The 2005-06 marketing year began on August 1, 2005, and the
marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each year
apply to all assessable walnuts handled during the year; (2) the Board
needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses which are incurred
on a continuous basis and; (3) handlers are aware of this action which
was unanimously recommended by the Board at a public meeting and is
similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Walnuts, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 984--WALNUTS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 984 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. Section 984.347 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 984.347 Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2005, an assessment rate of $0.0096 per
kernelweight pound is established for California merchantable walnuts.
Dated: October 31, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-22047 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P