Privacy Act; Implementation, 66314 [05-21783]
Download as PDF
66314
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 2, 2005 / Proposed Rules
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–21817 Filed 11–1–05; 8:45 am]
because they are concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act
systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 6750–01–C
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
impose no information requirements
beyond the Department of Defense and
that the information collected within
the Department of Defense is necessary
and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a,
known as the Privacy Act of 1974.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Contract Audit Agency
32 CFR Part 317
Privacy Act; Implementation
Defense Contract Audit
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Defense Contract Audit
Agency (DCAA) is proposing to update
the DCAA Privacy Act Program Rules,
32 CFR, Part 317, by deleting references
to a cancelled publication and by
adding guidance concerning the blanket
exemption for classified material.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 3, 2006 to be
considered by this agency.
Send comments to Senior
Advisor, Defense Contract Audit
Agency, Information and Privacy, CM,
8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2135,
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060–6201.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Debbie Teer at (703) 767–1002.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:45 Nov 01, 2005
Jkt 208001
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rulemaking for the Department of
Defense does not involve a Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have federalism implications.
The rules do not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 317
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 317 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 317—DCAA PRIVACY ACT
PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 317 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5
U.S.C. 552a)
§ 317.4
[Amended]
2. Amend § 317.4 as follows:
a. Remove paragraph (c)(5).
b. Redesignate paragraphs (c)(6),
(c)(7), and (c)(8) as (c)(5), (c)(6), and
(c)(7).
3. Amend part 317 by adding § 317.7
as follows:
§ 317.7
Exemptions.
All systems of records maintained by
DCAA will be exempt from the
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a(d) and
(e)(4)(H) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1)
to the extent that the system contains
any information properly classified
under Executive Order 12958, that is
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
required by the Executive Order to be
kept secret in the interest of national
defense or foreign policy. This
exemption, which may be applicable to
parts of all systems of records, is
necessary since certain record systems,
not otherwise specifically designated for
exemptions herein, may contain isolated
items of information which have been
properly classified.
Dated: October 27, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05–21783 Filed 11–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
Bundling Flat-Size and Irregular Parcel
Mail—Bundle Integrity
Postal Service.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Postal Service proposes
that mailers use two bands to secure all
bundles of presorted rate flat-size mail
and irregular parcels that are not
shrinkwrapped. This proposal would
remove the option to secure bundles up
to 1 inch thick with only one band.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before December 2, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver comments to
the Manager, Mailing Standards, U.S.
Postal Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW.,
Rm. 3436, Washington, DC 20260–3436.
You may inspect and photocopy all
written comments between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, at USPS
Headquarters Library, 11th Floor North,
475 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Washington,
DC 20260.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill
Chatfield at 202–268–7278.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are
proposing a revision to Mailing
Standards of the United States Postal
Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM)
that would require mailers to use at
least two bands—one around the length
and one around the girth—when only
banding is used to secure bundles of
flat-size and irregular parcel mailpieces.
‘‘Bundle integrity’’—the ability of
bundles to remain intact—is crucial for
our new, high-speed Automated
Package Processing System (APPS).
Bundles with only one band tend to curl
up and allow mailpieces to escape the
bundle. When these or other bundles
break open, we lose the value of mailers’
presort, and we have to handle
individual pieces manually. Manual
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 66314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21783]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Contract Audit Agency
32 CFR Part 317
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Defense Contract Audit Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) is proposing to
update the DCAA Privacy Act Program Rules, 32 CFR, Part 317, by
deleting references to a cancelled publication and by adding guidance
concerning the blanket exemption for classified material.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 3, 2006 to be
considered by this agency.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Senior Advisor, Defense Contract Audit
Agency, Information and Privacy, CM, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite
2135, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6201.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Debbie Teer at (703) 767-1002.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities because they are concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department
of Defense.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of
Defense and that the information collected within the Department of
Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the
Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 317
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 317 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 317--DCAA PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 317 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a)
Sec. 317.4 [Amended]
2. Amend Sec. 317.4 as follows:
a. Remove paragraph (c)(5).
b. Redesignate paragraphs (c)(6), (c)(7), and (c)(8) as (c)(5),
(c)(6), and (c)(7).
3. Amend part 317 by adding Sec. 317.7 as follows:
Sec. 317.7 Exemptions.
All systems of records maintained by DCAA will be exempt from the
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a(d) and (e)(4)(H) pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1) to the extent that the system contains any information
properly classified under Executive Order 12958, that is required by
the Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national
defense or foreign policy. This exemption, which may be applicable to
parts of all systems of records, is necessary since certain record
systems, not otherwise specifically designated for exemptions herein,
may contain isolated items of information which have been properly
classified.
Dated: October 27, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-21783 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M