Notice of Public Workshop on Draft Report for Comment: “Estimating Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) Frequencies Through the Elicitation Process,” NUREG-1829, 62352-62353 [05-21650]
Download as PDF
62352
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 209 / Monday, October 31, 2005 / Notices
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Workshop on Draft
Report for Comment: ‘‘Estimating
Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA)
Frequencies Through the Elicitation
Process,’’ NUREG–1829
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Announcement of public
workshop. Revision of workshop date.
AGENCY:
Workshop date, November 9,
2005.
Background: The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) issued draft
NUREG–1829, ‘‘Estimating Loss-ofCoolant Accident (LOCA) Frequencies
Through the Elicitation Process,’’ for
public comment in June 2005. The
report is available under ADAMS
Accession Number ML051520574 and
on the NRC Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/nuregs/staff/sr1829/. A
separate notice was published in the
Federal Register on October 4, 2005,
announcing the availability of this
report (70 FR 57901). This report
describes LOCA frequency estimates
developed using an expert elicitation
process in support of an effort to
develop a risk-informed revision of the
emergency core cooling system (ECCS)
requirements for commercial nuclear
power plants by redefinition of the
design-basis break size. The expert
elicitation process consolidates service
history data and insights from
probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM)
studies with knowledge of plant design,
operation, and material performance to
arrive at the LOCA frequency estimates.
The ECCS requirements in the United
States are contained in 10 CFR 50.46,
Appendix K to part 50, and General
Design Criterion (GDC) 35. Specifically,
ECCS design, reliability, and operating
requirements exist to ensure that the
system can successfully mitigate
postulated LOCAs. Consideration of an
instantaneous break with a flow rate
equivalent to a double-ended guillotine
break (DEGB) of the largest pipe in the
primary piping system of the plant
generally provides the limiting
condition in the required 10 CFR part
50, Appendix K analysis. However, the
DEGB is widely recognized as an
DATES:
extremely unlikely event, so NRC staff
is performing a risk-informed revision of
the design-basis break size
requirements.
A central consideration in selecting a
risk-informed design basis break size is
an evaluation of the LOCA frequency as
a function of break size. The most recent
NRC-sponsored study of pipe break
failure frequencies is contained in
NUREG/CR–5750 (Poloski, 1999).
Unfortunately, these estimates are not
sufficient for design basis break size
selection because they do not address
all current passive-system degradation
concerns (e.g., primary water stress
corrosion cracking) and they do not
discriminate among breaks having
effective diameters greater than 6
inches.
There have been two approaches
traditionally used to estimate LOCA
frequencies and their relationship to
pipe size: (i) Estimates based on
statistical analysis of service experience
data, and (ii) PFM analysis of specific
postulated failure mechanisms. Neither
approach is fully suitable for evaluating
LOCA event frequencies due to the
rarity of these events and the modeling
complexity. This study used an expert
elicitation process, which is wellrecognized for quantifying
phenomenological knowledge when
data or modeling approaches are
insufficient. Elicitation responses from a
panel of 12 experts determined
individual LOCA frequency estimates
for the 5th percentile, median, mean
and 95th percentile of the frequency
distribution for each of six LOCA
categories. Group estimates were
determined by aggregating the
individual estimates using the geometric
mean of the individual estimates for
each frequency parameter (i.e., median,
mean, 5th and 95th percentiles). Group
variability was estimated by calculating
95% confidence bounds for each of the
group frequency parameters. A number
of sensitivity analyses were conducted
to examine the effects on the
quantitative results from variation of the
assumptions, structure and techniques
of the baseline analysis procedure.
Public Workshop: The NRC will
conduct a public workshop on
Wednesday, November 9, 2005, to be
held in room O6B4 at NRC
Headquarters, 11545 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland. This is a revision
ADAMS Accession
No.
Document title
NUREG–1829 .........................................................................................................................
BWR Non-piping Raw Data for NUREG–1829 .......................................................................
BWR Piping Raw Data for NUREG–1829 ..............................................................................
PWR Non-piping Raw Data for NUREG–1829 .......................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Oct 28, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
to the October 31, 2005, workshop date
announced in the Federal Register
Notice published, October 4, 2005; 70
FR 57901. The purpose of the workshop
is to facilitate the comment process. In
the workshop, the staff will provide an
overview of the report and address
clarification of items identified by the
public. A preliminary agenda is
attached. Persons planning to attend
this meeting are urged to contact the
below named individual at least two
working days prior to the meeting to be
advised of any potential changes to the
agenda. The NRC seeks comments on
the report and is especially interested in
comments on the following questions:
1. Is the structure of the expert
elicitation process appropriate for the
stated problem and goals of the study?
2. Are the assumptions and
methodology of the analysis framework
used to process the panel responses
appropriate and reasonable? Are they
consistent with the type of information
provided by the expert panel and the
goals of the study?
3. Is the geometric mean aggregation
methodology appropriate for the panel
responses and the study goals? Should
other aggregation methodologies be
considered and what are their
advantages and disadvantages?
As previously published in the
Federal Register, October 4, 2005; 70 FR
57901, the NRC will consider all written
comments on draft NUREG–1829,
‘‘Estimating Loss-of-Coolant Accident
(LOCA) Frequencies Through the
Elicitation Process,’’ received before
November 30, 2005. Comments received
after November 30, 2005, will be
considered if time permits. Comments
should be addressed to the contact
listed below. An electronic version of
the report and the accompanying
experts’ raw data files, are available
electronically at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/
sr1829/ and through the NRC’s
Electronic Reading Room at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
From the latter site, you can access the
NRC’s Agencywide Document Access
and Management System (ADAMS),
which provides text and image files of
NRC’s public documents. The ADAMS
accession numbers for the documents
related to this notice are:
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ML051520574
ML051580341
ML051580344
ML051580346
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
.........
.........
.........
.........
31OCN1
File format
Adobe
Adobe
Adobe
Adobe
Acrobat
Acrobat
Acrobat
Acrobat
Document.
Document.
Document.
Document.
62353
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 209 / Monday, October 31, 2005 / Notices
Document title
ADAMS Accession
No.
PWR Piping Raw Data for NUREG–1829 ..............................................................................
ML051580347 .........
If you do not have access to ADAMS
or if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the NRC Public Document Room (PDR)
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O1F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Charles A. Greene, Mail Stop T10E10,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD
20852, telephone (301) 415–6177,
facsimile number: (301) 415–5074, email cag2@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day
of October 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jennifer Uhle,
Chief, Materials Engineering Branch, Division
of Engineering Technology, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research.
Attachment—Preliminary Agenda
Public Workshop on Draft Report for
Comment: ‘‘Estimating Loss-of-Coolant
Accident (LOCA) Frequencies through
the Elicitation Process,’’ NUREG–1829
November 9, 2005*—9 a.m.–12 p.m.,
Room O–4B6
Preliminary Agenda
9 a.m.–9:15 a.m.—Introduction
9:15 a.m.–9:45 a.m.—Overview of
NUREG–1829
9:45 a.m.–10:15 a.m.—Clarification of
items identified by the public
10:15 a.m.–10:30 a.m.—Break
10:30 a.m.–12 noon—Clarification of
items identified by the audience
12 noon—Adjourn
*Revised date
[FR Doc. 05–21650 Filed 10–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Excepted Service
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This gives notice of OPM
decisions granting authority to make
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Oct 28, 2005
Jkt 208001
appointments under Schedules A, B,
and C in the excepted service as
required by 5 CFR 6.6 and 213.103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Guilford, Center for Leadership
and Executive Resources Policy,
Division for Strategic Human Resources
Policy, 202–606–1391.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Appearing
in the listing below are the individual
authorities established under Schedules
A, B, and C between September 1, 2005,
and September 30, 2005.
Future notices will be published on
the fourth Tuesday of each month, or as
soon as possible thereafter.
A consolidated listing of all
authorities as of June 30 is published
each year.
Schedule A
No Schedule A appointments were
approved for September 2005.
Schedule B
No Schedule B appointments were
approved for September 2005.
Schedule C
The following Schedule C
appointments were approved during
September 2005:
Section 213.3303
the President
Executive Office of
Office of Management and Budget
BOGS60150 Confidential Assistant to
the Controller, Office of Federal
Financial Management.
Effective September 29, 2005.
Office of National Drug Control Policy
QQGS00041 Legislative Assistant to
the Associate Director, Legislative
Affairs. Effective September 20, 2005.
Section 213.3304 Department of State
DSGS60987 Program Support
Assistant to the Deputy Chief of
Protocol. Effective September 02,
2005.
DSGS60988 Special Assistant to the
Assistant Secretary, Bureau for
Educational and Cultural Affairs.
Effective September 09, 2005.
DSGS60990 Senior Advisor to the
Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern
and South Asian Affairs. Effective
September 16, 2005.
DSGS60965 Public Affairs Specialist
to the Deputy Chief of Protocol.
Effective September 27, 2005.
DSGS60997 Public Affairs Specialist
to the Assistant Secretary for Public
Affairs. Effective September 30, 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
File format
Adobe Acrobat Document.
Section 213.3305 Department of the
Treasury
DYGS00424 Senior Advisor to the
Assistant Secretary (Economic
Policy). Effective September 20, 2005.
DYGS00410 Senior Advisor to the
Deputy Secretary of the Treasury.
Effective September 29, 2005.
DYGS00359 Senior Advisor to the
Under Secretary for International
Affairs. Effective September 29, 2005.
DYGS00463 Special Assistant to the
Assistant Secretary (Management) and
Chief Financial Officer. Effective
September 29, 2005.
Section 213.3306 Office of the
Secretary of Defense
DDGS16888 Staff Assistant to the
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Eurasia). Effective September 06,
2005.
DDGS16890 Special Assistant to the
Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
(Resource Planning/Management).
Effective September 06, 2005.
DDGS16894 Personal and Confidential
Assistant to the Principal Under
Secretary of Defense (Policy).
Effective September 06, 2005.
DDGS16895 Staff Assistant to the
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Negotiations Policy). Effective
September 20, 2005.
Section 213.3307 Department of the
Army
DWGS60084 Personal and
Confidential Assistant to the Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the
Army (Manpower and Reserve
Affairs)/Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Training, Readiness and
Mobilization). Effective September 08,
2005.
DWGS60018 Special Assistant to the
Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Installations and Environment).
Effective September 27, 2005.
Section 213.3309 Department of the
Air Force
DFGS60014 Personal and Confidential
Assistant to the General Counsel.
Effective September 27, 2005.
Section 213.3310 Department of
Justice
DJGS00403 Public Affairs Specialist to
the Director, Office of Public Affairs.
Effective September 02, 2005.
DJGS00135 Special Assistant to the
Assistant Attorney General, Tax
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 209 (Monday, October 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62352-62353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21650]
[[Page 62352]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Notice of Public Workshop on Draft Report for Comment:
``Estimating Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) Frequencies Through the
Elicitation Process,'' NUREG-1829
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Announcement of public workshop. Revision of workshop date.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Workshop date, November 9, 2005.
Background: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued draft
NUREG-1829, ``Estimating Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) Frequencies
Through the Elicitation Process,'' for public comment in June 2005. The
report is available under ADAMS Accession Number ML051520574 and on the
NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/
staff/sr1829/. A separate notice was published in the Federal Register
on October 4, 2005, announcing the availability of this report (70 FR
57901). This report describes LOCA frequency estimates developed using
an expert elicitation process in support of an effort to develop a
risk-informed revision of the emergency core cooling system (ECCS)
requirements for commercial nuclear power plants by redefinition of the
design-basis break size. The expert elicitation process consolidates
service history data and insights from probabilistic fracture mechanics
(PFM) studies with knowledge of plant design, operation, and material
performance to arrive at the LOCA frequency estimates.
The ECCS requirements in the United States are contained in 10 CFR
50.46, Appendix K to part 50, and General Design Criterion (GDC) 35.
Specifically, ECCS design, reliability, and operating requirements
exist to ensure that the system can successfully mitigate postulated
LOCAs. Consideration of an instantaneous break with a flow rate
equivalent to a double-ended guillotine break (DEGB) of the largest
pipe in the primary piping system of the plant generally provides the
limiting condition in the required 10 CFR part 50, Appendix K analysis.
However, the DEGB is widely recognized as an extremely unlikely event,
so NRC staff is performing a risk-informed revision of the design-basis
break size requirements.
A central consideration in selecting a risk-informed design basis
break size is an evaluation of the LOCA frequency as a function of
break size. The most recent NRC-sponsored study of pipe break failure
frequencies is contained in NUREG/CR-5750 (Poloski, 1999).
Unfortunately, these estimates are not sufficient for design basis
break size selection because they do not address all current passive-
system degradation concerns (e.g., primary water stress corrosion
cracking) and they do not discriminate among breaks having effective
diameters greater than 6 inches.
There have been two approaches traditionally used to estimate LOCA
frequencies and their relationship to pipe size: (i) Estimates based on
statistical analysis of service experience data, and (ii) PFM analysis
of specific postulated failure mechanisms. Neither approach is fully
suitable for evaluating LOCA event frequencies due to the rarity of
these events and the modeling complexity. This study used an expert
elicitation process, which is well-recognized for quantifying
phenomenological knowledge when data or modeling approaches are
insufficient. Elicitation responses from a panel of 12 experts
determined individual LOCA frequency estimates for the 5th percentile,
median, mean and 95th percentile of the frequency distribution for each
of six LOCA categories. Group estimates were determined by aggregating
the individual estimates using the geometric mean of the individual
estimates for each frequency parameter (i.e., median, mean, 5th and
95th percentiles). Group variability was estimated by calculating 95%
confidence bounds for each of the group frequency parameters. A number
of sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the effects on the
quantitative results from variation of the assumptions, structure and
techniques of the baseline analysis procedure.
Public Workshop: The NRC will conduct a public workshop on
Wednesday, November 9, 2005, to be held in room O6B4 at NRC
Headquarters, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. This is a
revision to the October 31, 2005, workshop date announced in the
Federal Register Notice published, October 4, 2005; 70 FR 57901. The
purpose of the workshop is to facilitate the comment process. In the
workshop, the staff will provide an overview of the report and address
clarification of items identified by the public. A preliminary agenda
is attached. Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to
contact the below named individual at least two working days prior to
the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda. The
NRC seeks comments on the report and is especially interested in
comments on the following questions:
1. Is the structure of the expert elicitation process appropriate
for the stated problem and goals of the study?
2. Are the assumptions and methodology of the analysis framework
used to process the panel responses appropriate and reasonable? Are
they consistent with the type of information provided by the expert
panel and the goals of the study?
3. Is the geometric mean aggregation methodology appropriate for
the panel responses and the study goals? Should other aggregation
methodologies be considered and what are their advantages and
disadvantages?
As previously published in the Federal Register, October 4, 2005;
70 FR 57901, the NRC will consider all written comments on draft NUREG-
1829, ``Estimating Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) Frequencies Through
the Elicitation Process,'' received before November 30, 2005. Comments
received after November 30, 2005, will be considered if time permits.
Comments should be addressed to the contact listed below. An electronic
version of the report and the accompanying experts' raw data files, are
available electronically at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-
collections/nuregs/staff/sr1829/ and through the NRC's Electronic
Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From the
latter site, you can access the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and
Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC's
public documents. The ADAMS accession numbers for the documents related
to this notice are:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document title ADAMS Accession No. File format
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NUREG-1829......................... ML051520574..................... Adobe Acrobat Document.
BWR Non-piping Raw Data for NUREG- ML051580341..................... Adobe Acrobat Document.
1829.
BWR Piping Raw Data for NUREG-1829. ML051580344..................... Adobe Acrobat Document.
PWR Non-piping Raw Data for NUREG- ML051580346..................... Adobe Acrobat Document.
1829.
[[Page 62353]]
PWR Piping Raw Data for NUREG-1829. ML051580347..................... Adobe Acrobat Document.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public
Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed electronically on the public
computers located at the NRC's PDR, O1F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction contractor
will copy documents for a fee.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Charles A. Greene, Mail Stop
T10E10, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 11545 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, MD 20852, telephone (301) 415-6177, facsimile number: (301)
415-5074, e-mail cag2@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of October 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jennifer Uhle,
Chief, Materials Engineering Branch, Division of Engineering
Technology, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
Attachment--Preliminary Agenda
Public Workshop on Draft Report for Comment: ``Estimating Loss-of-
Coolant Accident (LOCA) Frequencies through the Elicitation Process,''
NUREG-1829
November 9, 2005*--9 a.m.-12 p.m., Room O-4B6
Preliminary Agenda
9 a.m.-9:15 a.m.--Introduction
9:15 a.m.-9:45 a.m.--Overview of NUREG-1829
9:45 a.m.-10:15 a.m.--Clarification of items identified by the public
10:15 a.m.-10:30 a.m.--Break
10:30 a.m.-12 noon--Clarification of items identified by the audience
12 noon--Adjourn
*Revised date
[FR Doc. 05-21650 Filed 10-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P