Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS); Specification of Requirements for Mobile Transmitting Unit Type Approval, 61941-61944 [05-21486]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 / Notices
fibropapillomatosis tumor removal
surgery and subsequent rehabilitation.
In the case that a turtle has evidence
of severe internal tumors, the turtle
would be euthanized. The applicant
does not expect that more than 2 turtles
would require euthanasia. The goal of
the additional research would be to
create baseline parameters of health
assessments, determine groups’
heterogenity and dispersal, and provide
insight into the pathogenesis of the
disease in the wild through the use of
long-term capture and release surveys.
Dated: October 20, 2005.
Stephen L. Leathery,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–21487 Filed 10–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 082605B]
Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS);
Specification of Requirements for
Mobile Transmitting Unit Type
Approval
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Revision of type approval
requirements for mobile transmitting
units.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document provides
notice of type approval requirements for
Mobile Transmitting Units (MTU) to be
authorized for use on any vessel
participating in the NOAA Vessel
Monitoring System (VMS ) program.
Vessels participating in VMS programs
must acquire an OLE - approved MTU
to comply with VMS standards set forth
in NMFS rules requiring the use of
VMS.
To obtain copies of the list
of NOAA-approved VMS MTU and
VMS communications service providers,
or to obtain information regarding the
status of VMS systems being evaluated
by NOAA, write to NOAA Fisheries,
Office for Law Enforcement (OLE), 8484
Georgia Avenue, Suite 415, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
current listing information contact Mark
Oswell, Outreach Specialist, or for
questions regarding VMS installation
and status of evaluations contact
Jonathan Pinkerton, National VMS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:12 Oct 26, 2005
Jkt 208001
Program Manager by phone: 301–427–
2300 or by fax: 301–427–2055.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice supersedes all previous notices
on MTU type approval requirements.
Previously installed MTU approved
under prior notices will continue to be
approved for the remainder of their
service life. New installations of a
previously approved MTU occurring
120 days or more after the publication
date of this notice must comply with all
of the requirements herein. All new
requests for type approval must comply
with all of the requirements herein.
Background
The Department of Commerce,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, National Marine
Fisheries Service, Office for Law
Enforcement (OLE) maintains MTU
specification requirements as an OLE
National Directive. This notice sets
prerequisite standards for the purpose of
type approval that must be met by an
MTU and any associated software before
it is authorized for use in the NOAA
VMS program. Vessels participating in
VMS programs must acquire an OLEapproved MTU to comply with the
specific VMS standards set forth in
NMFS rules requiring the use of VMS.
The MTU is a transceiver or
communications device, including
antennae, installed on fishing vessels
participating in the VMS requirement.
The MTU allows OLE to determine the
geographic position of the vessel during
specified intervals or events. In
addition, it enables mobile
communications services between OLE
and the vessel when using an OLEaccepted Mobile Communication
Service Provider (MCSP). (Note:
Standards for the MCSP are written in
the complementary directive titled
Mobile Communication Service
Provider Specification of Requirements.)
Goal
OLE seeks to deploy an ‘‘open
system,’’ whereby the fishing industry
participants may select from a variety of
suppliers that qualify and have been
approved to participate in VMS
programs. Fishermen must comply with
their Federal fishery regulations
regarding VMS and therefore may be
cited for a violation and held
accountable for monitoring anomalies
not attributable to faults in the MCSP or
MTU. Therefore, type approval is
essential to establish and maintain
uniformly high system integrity. By this
directive, OLE seeks to approve reliable,
robust, and secure MTU products and
thereby create and maintain a VMS
meeting the requirement of high
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61941
integrity. Specific VMS programs are
created to support particular NMFS
rules requiring the use of VMS, which
typically are designed to manage or
protect fish and other marine species
within designated areas.
Process
Based on a request for type approval
from an MTU supplier and certification
of certain minimal standards, OLE will
conduct a thorough evaluation and then
issue a statement accepting or denying
the type approval of the particular MTU.
An MTU must meet the minimal
national VMS standards, as required by
this directive, and the requirements of
the specific fisheries for which approval
is sought. MTU supplier requestors are
encouraged to review the national VMS
standards and NMFS rules requiring the
use of VMS prior to submitting a request
for approval. Upon successful
demonstration of compliance with the
requirements set forth in this directive,
OLE will issue an MTU type approval
within a particular communications
Class applicable to one or more VMS
operations targeting particular NMFS
rules requiring the use of VMS. OLE
will maintain a current list of type
approved MTU(s). OLE will forward
lists of type approved MTU(s) to the
respective regional Fisheries
Management Council(s), post the
information on the OLE website and
provide it by fax upon request.
OLE approval will not necessarily
result in NMFS procurement of the
MTU. Instead, OLE will request the
MTU supplier to provide a fact sheet to
provide information to the fishing
industry. This fact sheet will allow
fishermen to make purchase decisions
that are compatible with the VMS
standards and their individual needs.
Purchasing strategies are determined on
a per rule implementation basis.
Initiation
OLE will initiate the MTU type
approval process upon written request
from the supplier, subject to the
demonstration of compliance with this
directive and the availability of test
units. The requestor for type approval,
may include the manufacturer, or an
OEM/labeler, distributor, and/or reseller
acting as a representative of the
manufacturer. The evaluation may
include consideration if that MTU has
already passed a comparable type
approval process to qualify for use in a
foreign fisheries management effort. If
applicable, the supplier should provide
the MTU’s identifying characteristics,
the details of foreign VMS requirement
specifications, the MTU’s level of
compliance with them, and appropriate
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
61942
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 / Notices
contact details of the approving
authorities. OLE also will consider
approving an MTU OEM (original
equipment manufacturer) model built
from an equivalent MTU that already
has received OLE type approval under
this directive.
Interoperability
A supplier of an MTU seeking type
approval within a particular
communications Class for VMS shall
demonstrate that it meets the standards
when using at least one qualified MCSP
within that same Class. The standards in
this directive are intended to ensure that
type approval for a particular MTU will
permit its interoperability with all
qualified MCSPs within its same Class.
A Class refers to the medium, protocol,
and frequency of the mobile
communications technology. Some
examples of existing Classes include
Inmarsat-C and Qualcomm/OmniTracs.
To best promote interoperability within
a Class, MTU and MCSP acceptance
standards are outlined in separate
directives. However, concurrent with
the approval process for an MTU, the
approval for a same-class MCSP must be
either in place or pending. Data received
by OLE from the MTU via an approved
MCSP must be in a format compatible
with OLE tracking software.
Submission
A supplier of an MTU requesting type
approval shall begin by certifying that
the MTU meets the minimum national
VMS standards as required by this
directive. Suppliers must describe in
detail the extent to which its MTU
complies with each of the requirements
for the VMS rule implementation of
interest as stated within this directive.
The supplier, or requestor for type
approval, must provide OLE with two
MTUs for each fishery for which
application is made for a 90-day test and
approval period. The supplier must also
provide thorough MTU documentation,
including fact sheets, installation
guides, operator manuals, user
handbooks, the applicable interfacing
software, and technical support. OLE
shall review the submissions against the
criteria of this directive. Next, OLE shall
perform field test and sea trials. For this,
OLE will coordinate test conditions
with volunteer and/or contract fishing
vessels. These tests may involve
demonstrating every aspect of MTU
operation, including installation of a
registered MTU, location tracking,
messaging, and maintenance
procedures.
Submit requests for type approval,
along with hard and soft copies of
support material to: U.S. Department of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:12 Oct 26, 2005
Jkt 208001
Commerce; National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration; National
Marine Fisheries Service; Office for Law
Enforcement; Attention: Vessel
Monitoring System Program; 8484
Georgia Ave. Suite 415; Silver Spring,
MD 20910 USA; voice 301–427–2300;
fax 301–427–2055.
Litigation Support
Due to the use of VMS for law
enforcement, all technical aspects of a
supplier’s submission are subject to
being admitted as evidence in a court of
law, if needed. The reliability of all
technologies utilized in the MTU may
be analyzed in court for, inter alia,
testing procedures, error rates, peer
review, and general industry
acceptance. Further, the supplier may
be required to provide technical and
expert support for a litigation to support
the MTU capabilities to establish OLE’s
case against violators. If the
technologies have previously been
subject to such scrutiny in a court of
law, the supplier should describe the
evidence and any court finding on the
reliability of the technology.
Additionally, to maintain the integrity
of VMS for fisheries management, the
supplier will be required to sign a nondisclosure agreement limiting the
release of certain information that might
compromise the effectiveness of the
VMS operations, such as details of antitampering safeguards. The supplier
shall include a statement confirming its
agreement with these conditions.
Change Control
Once an MTU is approved, it is the
supplier’s responsibility to notify OLE
of any substantive change in the original
submission, such as changes to
firmware versions, and customer
support contacts. OLE reserves the right
to reconsider and revoke the MTU
approval if as a result of a change to the
MTU or VMS requirement the unit no
longer satisfies the requirement.
Any modification to the functionality
of an approved MTU including but not
limited to firmware, software, services,
or passwords unless expressly
authorized by NMFS OLE will
invalidate the type approval of the unit
and render it out of compliance with
NMFS rules requiring the use of VMS.
Any addition, deletion or change of the
firmware, software, services, or
passwords of an MTU unless expressly
authorized by NMFS OLE will also
invalidate the type approval of the unit
and render it out of compliance with
NMFS rules requiring the use of VMS.
Fishermen that are determined to be out
of compliance with Federal Fisheries
VMS regulations may be cited for
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
violations and held accountable for
monitoring anomalies not attributable to
faults in the MCSP or MTU.
Requestor
Requestors must respond to each of
the items listed in sections 1 through 6
of this document. The response should
indicate how the requestor complies
with the requirement referred to in the
item. Items that the requestor does not
currently comply with must be
responded to by explaining how the
requestor will comply with the
requirement prior to approval.
Section 1. Identifiers
1. 1. Specify the identifying
characteristics of the MTU:
1.1.1. Communications Class.
1.1.2. Manufacturer.
1.1.3. Brand Name.
1.1.4. Model Name.
1.1.5. Model Number.
1.1.6. Software Version Number and
Date.
1.1.7. Firmware Version Number and
Date.
1.1.8. Hardware Version Number and
Date.
1.1.9. Antenna Type.
1.1.10. Antenna Model Number and
Date.
1.1.11. MCSP Providing
Communications Services.
1.2. For the following responsibilities,
name the business entities who act on
behalf of the manufacturer and supplier
applying for type approval. Include the
address, phone, contacts, email, and
designated geographic territory where
applicable.
1.2.1. Manufacturer.
1.2.2. Label or use MTU for an OEM.
This includes re-labeling OEM MTUs or
reselling. Reselling includes valueadded reselling. The MTU that is type
approved is the final, value-added
product and not the original
manufacturer’s MTU, if enhancements
or modifications have been made. For
example, if a transceiver is contained
within an enclosure, it is the new
enclosure including the transceiver that
is being type approved.
1.2.3. Distribute.
1.2.4. Sell.
1.2.5. Bench configures the MTU at
the warehouse or point of supply.
1.2.6. Install MTU onboard the vessel.
1.2.7. Offer limited warranty.
1.2.8. Offer maintenance and service
agreement.
1.2.9. Repair.
1.2.10. Train.
1.2.11. Advertise.
Section 2. Messaging
The MTU must provide the following
messaging functionality:
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 / Notices
2.1. Transmit mandatory,
automatically generated position
reports.
2.2. Onboard visible or audible alarms
for malfunctioning of the MTU.
2.3. Ability to disable non-essential
alarms in non-Global Maritime Distress
and Safety System (GMDSS)
installations.
2.4. Ability to provide comprehensive
and transparent communications, which
function uniformly within the entire
geographic coverage area for that
communications class.
2.5. Two-way communications
between MCSP and MTU.
2.6. The ability to send and receive
free-form Internet email text messages.
Section 3. Position Data Formats and
Transmission
3.1. The MTU must provide position
information as required by the
applicable VMS rule in addition to:
3.1.1. Position fixes latitude and
longitude, including the hemisphere of
each.
3.1.2. The position fix precision must
be to the decimal minute hundredths.
3.1.3. Accuracy of the reported
position must be within 100 meters,
unless otherwise indicated by an
existing regulation or VMS requirement.
3.1.4. Communications between MTU
and MCSP must be secure from
tampering or interception, including the
reading of passwords and data.
Therefore, the MTU must have
mechanisms to prevent to the extent
possible:
3.1.4.1. Interception and ‘‘sniffing’’
during transmission from the MTU to
MCSP via either wireless or terrestrial
facilities.
3.1.4.2. Spoofing, whereby one MTU
is fraudulently identifying itself as
another MTU.
3.1.4.3. Modification of MTU
identification.
3.1.4.4. Interference with GMDSS or
other safety/distress functions.
3.1.4.5. Introduction of viruses that
may corrupt the messages, transmission,
or the VMS system.
3.2. MTU shall provide the ability to
meet minimum reporting requirements
and intervals as required for specific
NMFS rules requiring the use of VMS.
3.2.1. Provide automatically generated
position reporting, for vessels managed
individually or grouped by fleet, such
that OLE automatically receives position
reports at defined intervals transparent
to the geographic region.
3.2.2. Have the ability to store 100
position fixes in local, non-volatile
memory when the MTU is either unable
to transmit or OLE configured the MTU
to a ‘‘store and retrieve’’ mode. These
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:12 Oct 26, 2005
Jkt 208001
positions must be either transferred to
local storage media or transmitted via
MCSP. (This requirement is waived for
any MTU that was approved and
purchased under previously published
directives.)
3.2.3. Allow for variable reporting
intervals between 5 minutes and 24
hours.
3.2.4. MTU must be able to change
reporting intervals remotely, and only
by authorized users.
3.3. An MTU must be able to transmit
automatically generated position
reports, which contain the following:
3.3.1. Unique identification of an
MTU within the communications class.
3.3.2. Date (year/month/day with
century in the year) and time (GMT)
stamp of the position fix.
3.4. In addition to automatically
generated position reports, specially
identified position reports shall be
generated upon:
3.4.1. Antenna disconnection
3.4.2. Loss of the positioning
reference signals.
3.4.3.Loss of the mobile
communications signals.
3.4.4. Security events, power-up,
power-down, and other status data.
3.4.5. The vessel crossing a predefined geographic boundary.
3.4.6. MTU status information such as
configuration of programming and
reporting intervals.
3.4.7. When an MTU is powered up,
it must automatically re-establish its
position reporting function without
manual intervention.
Section 4. Enhanced Vessel Monitoring
System Terminals
In addition to the VMS requirements
defined in prior sections of this Type
Approval Specification; certain fisheries
require support for two way e-mail and
forms capabilities onboard the vessel.
Such VMS equipment is defined as an
‘‘Enhanced MTU,’’ or E-MTU. Before
submission of equipment for testing as
an E-MTU, the equipment must pass all
type approval tests as a standard MTU
configuration. Then, compliance with
the functions and features defined in
Section 4 will be tested. VMS
Equipment that passes these additional
tests will be Type Approved for use as
both an MTU (position reporting only)
and an E-MTU (position, text and formsbased reporting). The terminal may use
protocols other than SMTP but
translation to SMTP, and support for the
SMTP (Internet) addressing scheme is
required.
4.1. Text messaging
4.1.1. Text messaging from vessel to
shore with a minimum supported
message length of 1kb.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61943
4.1.2. User interface must support an
’address book’ capability and a function
permitting a ‘‘reply’’ to a received
message without re-entry of the senders
e-mail address.
4.1.3. A confirmation of delivery
function is required such that a user can
ascertain whether a specific message
was successfully transmitted via the
satellite system to the MCSP
e-mail server(s).
4.1.4. Onward delivery to NMFS must
be reliable and make use of features
such as SMTP retries and delivery
confirmation to ensure a reliable
transport path exists for text messages
sent from the vessel to NMFS.
4.1.5. The user interface must provide
the ability to review by date order, or by
recipient, messages that were previously
sent. The terminal must support a
minimum message history of 20
messages - commonly referred to as an
’Outbox’ or ’Sent’ messages display.
4.1.6. Text messaging from shore to
vessel with a minimum supported
message length of 1kb.
Attachment support is not required.
4.1.7. The user interface must provide
the ability to review by date order, or by
sender, all messages received. The
terminal must support a minimum
message history of 20 messages commonly referred to as an ’Inbox’.
4.1.8. Negative delivery notifications
must be sent to the originator where
delivery to the terminal could not be
completed for any reason. Such Non
Delivery Notification must include
sufficient information to uniquely
identify the message that failed and the
cause of failure (i.e., mobile number
invalid, mobile switched off etc.).
4.2. Electronic Forms
Pre-formatted messages are required
for the collection of validated data for
specific fisheries programs (i.e.,
declaration systems, catch effort
reporting). This capability is referred to
as Electronic Forms. The E-MTU must
support a minimum of 20 Forms,
selectable by the user from a menu.
Forms must be updatable over the air.
Copies of forms currently used by
NMFS are available upon request. From
time to time NMFS will provide all EMTU approved vendors with updates
defining new forms or modifying
existing forms. Such notice will be at
least 60 (sixty) days prior to the
introduction date for the new or
changed form. Vendors will be
responsible for translating the
requirements into E-MTU specific forms
definitions and transmitting the same to
all VMS terminals supplied to fishing
vessels. All forms software provided
with the E-MTU must be capable of
supporting the requirements described
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
61944
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 / Notices
in this specification. Additional
capabilities beyond those stated here are
acceptable, provided that the minimum
requirements are satisfied.
4.2.1. A form is defined as: (a) 1–40
characters describing the form, (b)
Delivery address (i.e., e-mail or other
network identifier), (c) Form number as
defined by NMFS to uniquely identify
the form, (d) Form version number
(numeric with one decimal place; i.e.,
1.2), and (e) a collection of 1–30 fields
and associated logic rules.
4.2.2. Each field (within a form) is
defined by the following elements.
Except where noted, all elements of the
field definition are mandatory: (a) Label
(0 to 40 characters, alpha numeric), (b)
Context Help Text (0 to 200 characters,
alpha numeric), (c)Type (Either;
enumeration, numeric, alpha,
alphanumeric or Boolean), (d) Default
Value, (e) Optional/Mandatory/Hidden/
Logic indicator, (f) Min/Max values (for
numeric fields only) in range 0.000 to
999,999, (g) Decimal places (for numeric
fields only) 0–3, and (h) Min/Max
characters (for alpha/alphanumeric
fields only).
4.2.3. Up to 100 code/value/help text
pairs (enumerations only) must be
provided, where codes are defined as 1–
20 alphanumeric characters, values are
1–80 alphanumeric characters and help
text is 0–200 characters. Such fields are
typically used to permit a user to select
from a range of options (i.e., geographic
areas, gear types, fish species). Codes
are used to compress the form data for
efficient transmission. Help text would
typically be displayed only when the
user selects a specific value from the
enumeration.
4.2.4. Form Validation: Each field
must be defined as; Optional,
Mandatory or Logic Driven. Mandatory
fields must be entered by the user before
the form is complete, optional fields
that do not require data entry, and logic
driven fields have their attributes
determined by earlier form selections.
Specifically; it must be possible for
selection of an enumeration to change
the optional/mandatory setting, min/
max values, or the permitted
enumeration values on a later field
within the same form.
4.2.5. State Information: The
capability to populate a form based on
the last values used must be available.
This provides the user with an easy
mechanism to ’modify’ or ’update’ a
prior submission - without unnecessary
re-entry of data. The user must be able
to review a minimum of 20 past form
submissions and ascertain for each form
when the form was transmitted and
whether delivery was successfully
completed to the vendor’s processing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:12 Oct 26, 2005
Jkt 208001
center. In the case of a transmission
failure, the user must be provided with
details of the cause and have the
opportunity to retry the form
submission.
4.2.6. Inclusion of VMS Position
Report: In addition to the manually
entered fields, the forms package must
permit the inclusion of VMS position
report fields such as latitude, longitude,
date and time. Such fields must be
obtained from the GPS function of the
MTU and transmitted along with the
manually entered form data within the
same transaction.
4.2.7. Delivery Format for Form Data:
It is preferred that form data be
transferred from the terminal to NMFS
using the same transport as for either
text messages or VMS position reports
(the selected option to be at the election
of the E-MTU vendor). Currently
supported protocols for transfer are;
FTP, SMTP, XML and HTTP Post. The
field coding within the data must follow
either CSV or XML formatting rules. For
CSV format the form must contain an
identifier and the version number, and
then the fields in the order defined on
the form. In the CSV format strings that
may contain ’’,’’ (comma) characters
must be quoted. XML representations
must use the field label to define the
XML element that contains each field
value.
Section 5. Customer Service
The MTU supplier or its designated
entities shall provide customer service
that is professional, courteous, and
responsive. It should provide MTU
diagnostic and troubleshooting support
to OLE and the fishermen. No services
shall be billed to any NOAA or OLE
office without being specifically
contracted for in writing by an
authorized entity. Services shall
include:
5.1. Service level, warranty, and
maintenance agreements. Clarify
constraints, if any, on the geographic
territory, personnel availability, and
escalation procedures for problem
resolution covered by such services.
5.2. Facilities and procedures in place
to assist the fisherman in maintaining
and repairing their MTU, including
response and general system turn
around time.
5.3. Help in the determination and
isolation of the cause of
communications anomalies.
5.4. Assist in the resolution of
communications anomalies that are
traced to the MTU.
5.5. All services will be considered to
be free of charge unless specifically
listed in service or purchase agreements.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Section 6. Other Information
6.1. The MTU must have the
durability and reliability necessary to
provide acceptable service in a marine
environment where the unit may be
subjected to saltwater (spray) in smaller
vessels, and in larger vessels where the
unit may be maintained in a
wheelhouse. The unit, cabling and
antenna must be resistant to moisture
and shock associate with the marine
environments.
6.2. The MTU must comply with any
additional requirements specified in the
regulations for the VMS implementation
for which application is made. The
requestor must review the applicable
NMFS rules requiring the use of VMS
and respond here to any specific
requirements listed therein.
6.3. All personally identifying
information provided by vessels owners
or other authorized personnel for the
purchase or activation of MTU or EMTU, or for the participation in any
NMFS VMS-approved fishery must be
protected from unauthorized disclosure.
Personally identifying information
includes, but is not limited to, names,
addresses, telephone numbers, social
security account numbers, credit card
numbers, vessel names, federal, state,
and local documentation numbers, email addresses, and crew lists. Any
information sent electronically to the
OLE must be transmitted by a secure
means that prevents interception,
spoofing, or viewing by unauthorized
individuals. Any release of such
information must be requested and
approved in writing by the vessel owner
or authorized personnel, or the OLE.
Inadvertent or intentional unauthorized
release of personally identifying
information will be grounds for
reconsideration and possible revocation
of the type approval for any MTU or EMTU supplied by the offending
provider.
Dated: October 24, 2005.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–21486 Filed 10–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Publication of State Plan Pursuant to
the Help America Vote Act
Election Assistance
Commission (EAC).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to sections
254(a)(11)(A) and 255(b) of the Help
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 207 (Thursday, October 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61941-61944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21486]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 082605B]
Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS); Specification of Requirements
for Mobile Transmitting Unit Type Approval
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Revision of type approval requirements for mobile transmitting
units.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice of type approval requirements
for Mobile Transmitting Units (MTU) to be authorized for use on any
vessel participating in the NOAA Vessel Monitoring System (VMS )
program. Vessels participating in VMS programs must acquire an OLE -
approved MTU to comply with VMS standards set forth in NMFS rules
requiring the use of VMS.
ADDRESSES: To obtain copies of the list of NOAA-approved VMS MTU and
VMS communications service providers, or to obtain information
regarding the status of VMS systems being evaluated by NOAA, write to
NOAA Fisheries, Office for Law Enforcement (OLE), 8484 Georgia Avenue,
Suite 415, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For current listing information
contact Mark Oswell, Outreach Specialist, or for questions regarding
VMS installation and status of evaluations contact Jonathan Pinkerton,
National VMS Program Manager by phone: 301-427-2300 or by fax: 301-427-
2055.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice supersedes all previous notices
on MTU type approval requirements. Previously installed MTU approved
under prior notices will continue to be approved for the remainder of
their service life. New installations of a previously approved MTU
occurring 120 days or more after the publication date of this notice
must comply with all of the requirements herein. All new requests for
type approval must comply with all of the requirements herein.
Background
The Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office for Law
Enforcement (OLE) maintains MTU specification requirements as an OLE
National Directive. This notice sets prerequisite standards for the
purpose of type approval that must be met by an MTU and any associated
software before it is authorized for use in the NOAA VMS program.
Vessels participating in VMS programs must acquire an OLE-approved MTU
to comply with the specific VMS standards set forth in NMFS rules
requiring the use of VMS. The MTU is a transceiver or communications
device, including antennae, installed on fishing vessels participating
in the VMS requirement. The MTU allows OLE to determine the geographic
position of the vessel during specified intervals or events. In
addition, it enables mobile communications services between OLE and the
vessel when using an OLE-accepted Mobile Communication Service Provider
(MCSP). (Note: Standards for the MCSP are written in the complementary
directive titled Mobile Communication Service Provider Specification of
Requirements.)
Goal
OLE seeks to deploy an ``open system,'' whereby the fishing
industry participants may select from a variety of suppliers that
qualify and have been approved to participate in VMS programs.
Fishermen must comply with their Federal fishery regulations regarding
VMS and therefore may be cited for a violation and held accountable for
monitoring anomalies not attributable to faults in the MCSP or MTU.
Therefore, type approval is essential to establish and maintain
uniformly high system integrity. By this directive, OLE seeks to
approve reliable, robust, and secure MTU products and thereby create
and maintain a VMS meeting the requirement of high integrity. Specific
VMS programs are created to support particular NMFS rules requiring the
use of VMS, which typically are designed to manage or protect fish and
other marine species within designated areas.
Process
Based on a request for type approval from an MTU supplier and
certification of certain minimal standards, OLE will conduct a thorough
evaluation and then issue a statement accepting or denying the type
approval of the particular MTU. An MTU must meet the minimal national
VMS standards, as required by this directive, and the requirements of
the specific fisheries for which approval is sought. MTU supplier
requestors are encouraged to review the national VMS standards and NMFS
rules requiring the use of VMS prior to submitting a request for
approval. Upon successful demonstration of compliance with the
requirements set forth in this directive, OLE will issue an MTU type
approval within a particular communications Class applicable to one or
more VMS operations targeting particular NMFS rules requiring the use
of VMS. OLE will maintain a current list of type approved MTU(s). OLE
will forward lists of type approved MTU(s) to the respective regional
Fisheries Management Council(s), post the information on the OLE
website and provide it by fax upon request.
OLE approval will not necessarily result in NMFS procurement of the
MTU. Instead, OLE will request the MTU supplier to provide a fact sheet
to provide information to the fishing industry. This fact sheet will
allow fishermen to make purchase decisions that are compatible with the
VMS standards and their individual needs. Purchasing strategies are
determined on a per rule implementation basis.
Initiation
OLE will initiate the MTU type approval process upon written
request from the supplier, subject to the demonstration of compliance
with this directive and the availability of test units. The requestor
for type approval, may include the manufacturer, or an OEM/labeler,
distributor, and/or reseller acting as a representative of the
manufacturer. The evaluation may include consideration if that MTU has
already passed a comparable type approval process to qualify for use in
a foreign fisheries management effort. If applicable, the supplier
should provide the MTU's identifying characteristics, the details of
foreign VMS requirement specifications, the MTU's level of compliance
with them, and appropriate
[[Page 61942]]
contact details of the approving authorities. OLE also will consider
approving an MTU OEM (original equipment manufacturer) model built from
an equivalent MTU that already has received OLE type approval under
this directive.
Interoperability
A supplier of an MTU seeking type approval within a particular
communications Class for VMS shall demonstrate that it meets the
standards when using at least one qualified MCSP within that same
Class. The standards in this directive are intended to ensure that type
approval for a particular MTU will permit its interoperability with all
qualified MCSPs within its same Class. A Class refers to the medium,
protocol, and frequency of the mobile communications technology. Some
examples of existing Classes include Inmarsat-C and Qualcomm/OmniTracs.
To best promote interoperability within a Class, MTU and MCSP
acceptance standards are outlined in separate directives. However,
concurrent with the approval process for an MTU, the approval for a
same-class MCSP must be either in place or pending. Data received by
OLE from the MTU via an approved MCSP must be in a format compatible
with OLE tracking software.
Submission
A supplier of an MTU requesting type approval shall begin by
certifying that the MTU meets the minimum national VMS standards as
required by this directive. Suppliers must describe in detail the
extent to which its MTU complies with each of the requirements for the
VMS rule implementation of interest as stated within this directive.
The supplier, or requestor for type approval, must provide OLE with two
MTUs for each fishery for which application is made for a 90-day test
and approval period. The supplier must also provide thorough MTU
documentation, including fact sheets, installation guides, operator
manuals, user handbooks, the applicable interfacing software, and
technical support. OLE shall review the submissions against the
criteria of this directive. Next, OLE shall perform field test and sea
trials. For this, OLE will coordinate test conditions with volunteer
and/or contract fishing vessels. These tests may involve demonstrating
every aspect of MTU operation, including installation of a registered
MTU, location tracking, messaging, and maintenance procedures.
Submit requests for type approval, along with hard and soft copies
of support material to: U.S. Department of Commerce; National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration; National Marine Fisheries Service;
Office for Law Enforcement; Attention: Vessel Monitoring System
Program; 8484 Georgia Ave. Suite 415; Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA;
voice 301-427-2300; fax 301-427-2055.
Litigation Support
Due to the use of VMS for law enforcement, all technical aspects of
a supplier's submission are subject to being admitted as evidence in a
court of law, if needed. The reliability of all technologies utilized
in the MTU may be analyzed in court for, inter alia, testing
procedures, error rates, peer review, and general industry acceptance.
Further, the supplier may be required to provide technical and expert
support for a litigation to support the MTU capabilities to establish
OLE's case against violators. If the technologies have previously been
subject to such scrutiny in a court of law, the supplier should
describe the evidence and any court finding on the reliability of the
technology. Additionally, to maintain the integrity of VMS for
fisheries management, the supplier will be required to sign a non-
disclosure agreement limiting the release of certain information that
might compromise the effectiveness of the VMS operations, such as
details of anti-tampering safeguards. The supplier shall include a
statement confirming its agreement with these conditions.
Change Control
Once an MTU is approved, it is the supplier's responsibility to
notify OLE of any substantive change in the original submission, such
as changes to firmware versions, and customer support contacts. OLE
reserves the right to reconsider and revoke the MTU approval if as a
result of a change to the MTU or VMS requirement the unit no longer
satisfies the requirement.
Any modification to the functionality of an approved MTU including
but not limited to firmware, software, services, or passwords unless
expressly authorized by NMFS OLE will invalidate the type approval of
the unit and render it out of compliance with NMFS rules requiring the
use of VMS. Any addition, deletion or change of the firmware, software,
services, or passwords of an MTU unless expressly authorized by NMFS
OLE will also invalidate the type approval of the unit and render it
out of compliance with NMFS rules requiring the use of VMS. Fishermen
that are determined to be out of compliance with Federal Fisheries VMS
regulations may be cited for violations and held accountable for
monitoring anomalies not attributable to faults in the MCSP or MTU.
Requestor
Requestors must respond to each of the items listed in sections 1
through 6 of this document. The response should indicate how the
requestor complies with the requirement referred to in the item. Items
that the requestor does not currently comply with must be responded to
by explaining how the requestor will comply with the requirement prior
to approval.
Section 1. Identifiers
1. 1. Specify the identifying characteristics of the MTU:
1.1.1. Communications Class.
1.1.2. Manufacturer.
1.1.3. Brand Name.
1.1.4. Model Name.
1.1.5. Model Number.
1.1.6. Software Version Number and Date.
1.1.7. Firmware Version Number and Date.
1.1.8. Hardware Version Number and Date.
1.1.9. Antenna Type.
1.1.10. Antenna Model Number and Date.
1.1.11. MCSP Providing Communications Services.
1.2. For the following responsibilities, name the business entities
who act on behalf of the manufacturer and supplier applying for type
approval. Include the address, phone, contacts, email, and designated
geographic territory where applicable.
1.2.1. Manufacturer.
1.2.2. Label or use MTU for an OEM. This includes re-labeling OEM
MTUs or reselling. Reselling includes value-added reselling. The MTU
that is type approved is the final, value-added product and not the
original manufacturer's MTU, if enhancements or modifications have been
made. For example, if a transceiver is contained within an enclosure,
it is the new enclosure including the transceiver that is being type
approved.
1.2.3. Distribute.
1.2.4. Sell.
1.2.5. Bench configures the MTU at the warehouse or point of
supply.
1.2.6. Install MTU onboard the vessel.
1.2.7. Offer limited warranty.
1.2.8. Offer maintenance and service agreement.
1.2.9. Repair.
1.2.10. Train.
1.2.11. Advertise.
Section 2. Messaging
The MTU must provide the following messaging functionality:
[[Page 61943]]
2.1. Transmit mandatory, automatically generated position reports.
2.2. Onboard visible or audible alarms for malfunctioning of the
MTU.
2.3. Ability to disable non-essential alarms in non-Global Maritime
Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) installations.
2.4. Ability to provide comprehensive and transparent
communications, which function uniformly within the entire geographic
coverage area for that communications class.
2.5. Two-way communications between MCSP and MTU.
2.6. The ability to send and receive free-form Internet email text
messages.
Section 3. Position Data Formats and Transmission
3.1. The MTU must provide position information as required by the
applicable VMS rule in addition to:
3.1.1. Position fixes latitude and longitude, including the
hemisphere of each.
3.1.2. The position fix precision must be to the decimal minute
hundredths.
3.1.3. Accuracy of the reported position must be within 100 meters,
unless otherwise indicated by an existing regulation or VMS
requirement.
3.1.4. Communications between MTU and MCSP must be secure from
tampering or interception, including the reading of passwords and data.
Therefore, the MTU must have mechanisms to prevent to the extent
possible:
3.1.4.1. Interception and ``sniffing'' during transmission from the
MTU to MCSP via either wireless or terrestrial facilities.
3.1.4.2. Spoofing, whereby one MTU is fraudulently identifying
itself as another MTU.
3.1.4.3. Modification of MTU identification.
3.1.4.4. Interference with GMDSS or other safety/distress
functions.
3.1.4.5. Introduction of viruses that may corrupt the messages,
transmission, or the VMS system.
3.2. MTU shall provide the ability to meet minimum reporting
requirements and intervals as required for specific NMFS rules
requiring the use of VMS.
3.2.1. Provide automatically generated position reporting, for
vessels managed individually or grouped by fleet, such that OLE
automatically receives position reports at defined intervals
transparent to the geographic region.
3.2.2. Have the ability to store 100 position fixes in local, non-
volatile memory when the MTU is either unable to transmit or OLE
configured the MTU to a ``store and retrieve'' mode. These positions
must be either transferred to local storage media or transmitted via
MCSP. (This requirement is waived for any MTU that was approved and
purchased under previously published directives.)
3.2.3. Allow for variable reporting intervals between 5 minutes and
24 hours.
3.2.4. MTU must be able to change reporting intervals remotely, and
only by authorized users.
3.3. An MTU must be able to transmit automatically generated
position reports, which contain the following:
3.3.1. Unique identification of an MTU within the communications
class.
3.3.2. Date (year/month/day with century in the year) and time
(GMT) stamp of the position fix.
3.4. In addition to automatically generated position reports,
specially identified position reports shall be generated upon:
3.4.1. Antenna disconnection
3.4.2. Loss of the positioning reference signals.
3.4.3.Loss of the mobile communications signals.
3.4.4. Security events, power-up, power-down, and other status
data.
3.4.5. The vessel crossing a pre-defined geographic boundary.
3.4.6. MTU status information such as configuration of programming
and reporting intervals.
3.4.7. When an MTU is powered up, it must automatically re-
establish its position reporting function without manual intervention.
Section 4. Enhanced Vessel Monitoring System Terminals
In addition to the VMS requirements defined in prior sections of
this Type Approval Specification; certain fisheries require support for
two way e-mail and forms capabilities onboard the vessel. Such VMS
equipment is defined as an ``Enhanced MTU,'' or E-MTU. Before
submission of equipment for testing as an E-MTU, the equipment must
pass all type approval tests as a standard MTU configuration. Then,
compliance with the functions and features defined in Section 4 will be
tested. VMS Equipment that passes these additional tests will be Type
Approved for use as both an MTU (position reporting only) and an E-MTU
(position, text and forms-based reporting). The terminal may use
protocols other than SMTP but translation to SMTP, and support for the
SMTP (Internet) addressing scheme is required.
4.1. Text messaging
4.1.1. Text messaging from vessel to shore with a minimum supported
message length of 1kb.
4.1.2. User interface must support an 'address book' capability and
a function permitting a ``reply'' to a received message without re-
entry of the senders e-mail address.
4.1.3. A confirmation of delivery function is required such that a
user can ascertain whether a specific message was successfully
transmitted via the satellite system to the MCSP
e-mail server(s).
4.1.4. Onward delivery to NMFS must be reliable and make use of
features such as SMTP retries and delivery confirmation to ensure a
reliable transport path exists for text messages sent from the vessel
to NMFS.
4.1.5. The user interface must provide the ability to review by
date order, or by recipient, messages that were previously sent. The
terminal must support a minimum message history of 20 messages -
commonly referred to as an 'Outbox' or 'Sent' messages display.
4.1.6. Text messaging from shore to vessel with a minimum supported
message length of 1kb.
Attachment support is not required.
4.1.7. The user interface must provide the ability to review by
date order, or by sender, all messages received. The terminal must
support a minimum message history of 20 messages - commonly referred to
as an 'Inbox'.
4.1.8. Negative delivery notifications must be sent to the
originator where delivery to the terminal could not be completed for
any reason. Such Non Delivery Notification must include sufficient
information to uniquely identify the message that failed and the cause
of failure (i.e., mobile number invalid, mobile switched off etc.).
4.2. Electronic Forms
Pre-formatted messages are required for the collection of validated
data for specific fisheries programs (i.e., declaration systems, catch
effort reporting). This capability is referred to as Electronic Forms.
The E-MTU must support a minimum of 20 Forms, selectable by the user
from a menu. Forms must be updatable over the air. Copies of forms
currently used by NMFS are available upon request. From time to time
NMFS will provide all E-MTU approved vendors with updates defining new
forms or modifying existing forms. Such notice will be at least 60
(sixty) days prior to the introduction date for the new or changed
form. Vendors will be responsible for translating the requirements into
E-MTU specific forms definitions and transmitting the same to all VMS
terminals supplied to fishing vessels. All forms software provided with
the E-MTU must be capable of supporting the requirements described
[[Page 61944]]
in this specification. Additional capabilities beyond those stated here
are acceptable, provided that the minimum requirements are satisfied.
4.2.1. A form is defined as: (a) 1-40 characters describing the
form, (b) Delivery address (i.e., e-mail or other network identifier),
(c) Form number as defined by NMFS to uniquely identify the form, (d)
Form version number (numeric with one decimal place; i.e., 1.2), and
(e) a collection of 1-30 fields and associated logic rules.
4.2.2. Each field (within a form) is defined by the following
elements. Except where noted, all elements of the field definition are
mandatory: (a) Label (0 to 40 characters, alpha numeric), (b) Context
Help Text (0 to 200 characters, alpha numeric), (c)Type (Either;
enumeration, numeric, alpha, alphanumeric or Boolean), (d) Default
Value, (e) Optional/Mandatory/Hidden/Logic indicator, (f) Min/Max
values (for numeric fields only) in range 0.000 to 999,999, (g) Decimal
places (for numeric fields only) 0-3, and (h) Min/Max characters (for
alpha/alphanumeric fields only).
4.2.3. Up to 100 code/value/help text pairs (enumerations only)
must be provided, where codes are defined as 1-20 alphanumeric
characters, values are 1-80 alphanumeric characters and help text is 0-
200 characters. Such fields are typically used to permit a user to
select from a range of options (i.e., geographic areas, gear types,
fish species). Codes are used to compress the form data for efficient
transmission. Help text would typically be displayed only when the user
selects a specific value from the enumeration.
4.2.4. Form Validation: Each field must be defined as; Optional,
Mandatory or Logic Driven. Mandatory fields must be entered by the user
before the form is complete, optional fields that do not require data
entry, and logic driven fields have their attributes determined by
earlier form selections. Specifically; it must be possible for
selection of an enumeration to change the optional/mandatory setting,
min/max values, or the permitted enumeration values on a later field
within the same form.
4.2.5. State Information: The capability to populate a form based
on the last values used must be available. This provides the user with
an easy mechanism to 'modify' or 'update' a prior submission - without
unnecessary re-entry of data. The user must be able to review a minimum
of 20 past form submissions and ascertain for each form when the form
was transmitted and whether delivery was successfully completed to the
vendor's processing center. In the case of a transmission failure, the
user must be provided with details of the cause and have the
opportunity to retry the form submission.
4.2.6. Inclusion of VMS Position Report: In addition to the
manually entered fields, the forms package must permit the inclusion of
VMS position report fields such as latitude, longitude, date and time.
Such fields must be obtained from the GPS function of the MTU and
transmitted along with the manually entered form data within the same
transaction.
4.2.7. Delivery Format for Form Data: It is preferred that form
data be transferred from the terminal to NMFS using the same transport
as for either text messages or VMS position reports (the selected
option to be at the election of the E-MTU vendor). Currently supported
protocols for transfer are; FTP, SMTP, XML and HTTP Post. The field
coding within the data must follow either CSV or XML formatting rules.
For CSV format the form must contain an identifier and the version
number, and then the fields in the order defined on the form. In the
CSV format strings that may contain '','' (comma) characters must be
quoted. XML representations must use the field label to define the XML
element that contains each field value.
Section 5. Customer Service
The MTU supplier or its designated entities shall provide customer
service that is professional, courteous, and responsive. It should
provide MTU diagnostic and troubleshooting support to OLE and the
fishermen. No services shall be billed to any NOAA or OLE office
without being specifically contracted for in writing by an authorized
entity. Services shall include:
5.1. Service level, warranty, and maintenance agreements. Clarify
constraints, if any, on the geographic territory, personnel
availability, and escalation procedures for problem resolution covered
by such services.
5.2. Facilities and procedures in place to assist the fisherman in
maintaining and repairing their MTU, including response and general
system turn around time.
5.3. Help in the determination and isolation of the cause of
communications anomalies.
5.4. Assist in the resolution of communications anomalies that are
traced to the MTU.
5.5. All services will be considered to be free of charge unless
specifically listed in service or purchase agreements.
Section 6. Other Information
6.1. The MTU must have the durability and reliability necessary to
provide acceptable service in a marine environment where the unit may
be subjected to saltwater (spray) in smaller vessels, and in larger
vessels where the unit may be maintained in a wheelhouse. The unit,
cabling and antenna must be resistant to moisture and shock associate
with the marine environments.
6.2. The MTU must comply with any additional requirements specified
in the regulations for the VMS implementation for which application is
made. The requestor must review the applicable NMFS rules requiring the
use of VMS and respond here to any specific requirements listed
therein.
6.3. All personally identifying information provided by vessels
owners or other authorized personnel for the purchase or activation of
MTU or E-MTU, or for the participation in any NMFS VMS-approved fishery
must be protected from unauthorized disclosure. Personally identifying
information includes, but is not limited to, names, addresses,
telephone numbers, social security account numbers, credit card
numbers, vessel names, federal, state, and local documentation numbers,
e-mail addresses, and crew lists. Any information sent electronically
to the OLE must be transmitted by a secure means that prevents
interception, spoofing, or viewing by unauthorized individuals. Any
release of such information must be requested and approved in writing
by the vessel owner or authorized personnel, or the OLE. Inadvertent or
intentional unauthorized release of personally identifying information
will be grounds for reconsideration and possible revocation of the type
approval for any MTU or E-MTU supplied by the offending provider.
Dated: October 24, 2005.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-21486 Filed 10-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S