Price-Anderson Act Financial Protection Regulations and Elimination of Antitrust Reviews, 61885-61888 [05-21342]
Download as PDF
61885
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 207
Thursday, October 27, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Parts 2, 50, 52, and 140
RIN 3150–AH78
Price-Anderson Act Financial
Protection Regulations and Elimination
of Antitrust Reviews
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is amending its
regulations to conform with the
requirements of the Energy Policy Act of
2005. The revised regulations include
Congress’s prescribed increase in the
amount of the required annual financial
contributions required from commercial
reactors in the event of a nuclear
accident to pay for third party liability
under the Price-Anderson Act. Another
revision provides Congress’s
accommodation for modular reactors,
which permits a defined combination of
these reactors to be considered a single
reactor for the determination of
financial obligations under the PriceAnderson Act. Additional revisions,
essentially deletions, result from
Congress’s terminating NRC’s authority
and responsibility to conduct antitrust
reviews of future applications to
construct or operate a nuclear reactor.
DATES: This rule is effective on
November 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marjorie Nordlinger, Senior Attorney,
Office of the General Counsel, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone
(301) 415–1616, e-mail MSN@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Final Rule
III. Voluntary Consensus Standards
IV. Finding of No Significant Impact:
Environmental Assessment
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Oct 26, 2005
Jkt 208001
V. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
VI. Regulatory Analysis
VII. Backfit Analysis
VIII. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) is amending its regulations to
conform with recently enacted
provisions contained in the Energy
Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109–58.
In that act, Congress amended Section
170 of the Atomic Energy Act (the PriceAnderson Act) to increase the amount
reactor licensees must contribute
annually to compensate the public for
damages if a nuclear accident occurs.
Congress also provided special
treatment for potential licensees of
modular reactors by defining what
combination of reactors is entitled to be
considered a single reactor under the
Price-Anderson Act for determining the
applicable financial requirements. In the
same legislation, Congress eliminated
NRC’s authority and responsibility to
conduct antitrust reviews of future
applications for a license to construct or
operate a nuclear reactor.
This rule revises the Commission’s
regulations solely to comply with the
Energy Policy Act of 2005. The changes
simply incorporate mandatory statutory
requirements or eliminate authorities
and actions under a Congressional
mandate, which by its terms applies
only to future nuclear reactor
construction permits and operating
license applications and has no effect on
the Commissions’ authority relative to
existing nuclear reactor operating
license antitrust conditions.
Accordingly, good cause exists under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to publish this final
rule without soliciting public comment
because the Commission has no
discretion in these matters and public
comment would serve no useful
purpose. The revisions are being
published as a final rule that will
become effective 30 days from the date
of publication in the Federal Register.
II. Discussion of the Final Rule
A. Antitrust Amendments
The Atomic Energy Commission and
its successor the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission have had the authority and
obligation to conduct antitrust reviews
of applicants for licenses to construct
and operate nuclear reactors. In
determining whether to grant such a
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
license, the Commission was required to
make a finding whether the activities
under the license would create or
maintain a situation inconsistent with
the Nation’s antitrust laws. Sometimes
the Commission has needed to conduct
a lengthy hearing on antitrust issues
before issuing its decision. In recent
years, other Government agencies more
specialized in financial matters have
demonstrated oversight and authority
sufficient to discern and address
potential anticompetitive behavior of
nuclear energy producers. In light of the
redundant antitrust responsibilities of
the Commission and those agencies,
Congress enacted section 625 of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 which
eliminated the Commission’s antitrust
authority with respect to future license
applications. The final rule’s changes in
the regulations remove all antitrust
review requirements and references to
the discontinued antitrust review.
B. Price-Anderson Act Amendments
In the event of a serious nuclear
accident with substantial offsite
damages, the Price-Anderson
Amendments Act of 1988 required each
licensee of a commercial reactor (one
with a rated capacity of 100,000
electrical kilowatts or more) to pay into
a retrospective premium pool, as
needed, $10 million annually per
reactor up to the sum of $63 million as
adjusted for inflation to pay for harm to
person or property caused by the
accident. By August 2003, that sum, as
adjusted for inflation, had reached the
amount of $95,800,000. In section 603 of
The Energy Policy Act of 2005, Congress
replaced the $63 million limit with the
$95,800,000 current limit, already
incorporated in the Commission’s rules
as the new base for inflation adjustment.
Congress also decided that the $10
million annual payment which had
remained unchanged since 1988 should
be increased to $15 million and should
be adjusted for inflation in the future.
Accordingly, the Commission is
changing the regulation to reflect the
current $15 million amount the nuclear
reactor licensees would pay annually if
public liability damages exceeded the
insurance required to be carried by the
licensee.
In section 608 of the Energy Policy
Act of 2005, Congress recognized that
new designs of reactors known as
modular reactors could result in
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
61886
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
groupings of a smaller capacity reactor
than the typical commercial reactor
currently in use, but where each single
modular reactor still exceeds the
100,000 electrical kilowatts that would
trigger the financial obligations
currently required of a large reactor. To
make the small modular reactors
economically feasible while maintaining
for them an equitable obligation to
assure available funds for the public, the
Energy Policy Act provided that a
prescribed combination of facilities
should be considered as a single facility
for the sole purpose of assessing
financial obligations under the PriceAnderson Act. The Commission is
amending its rules to include the
description of the combination of
modular reactors which is to be treated
as a single reactor for assessing
obligations to contribute to the pool that
will pay for public harm if a serious
nuclear accident occurs.
III. Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995, Public
Law 104–113, requires that Federal
agencies use technical standards that are
developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies unless the
use of such a standard is inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. In this rule, the NRC is
revising its regulations to reflect
statutory mandates contained in the
Energy Policy Act of 2005. This action
does not constitute the establishment of
a standard that contains generally
applicable requirements.
IV. Finding of No Significant Impact:
Environmental Assessment
The Commission has determined
under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and the
Commission’s regulations in Subpart A
of 10 CFR Part 51, that this rule is not
a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment and, therefore, an
environmental impact statement is not
required. The basis for this
determination is that the rule relates to
liability under the Price-Anderson Act
and the elimination of NRC’s antitrust
reviews. In addition, the changes to the
regulations in Parts 2, 50, 52 and 140 are
actions that fall within the categorical
exclusions set out in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(1)
and (3).
V. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
This final rule does not contain new
or amended information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). Existing requirements were
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Oct 26, 2005
Jkt 208001
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget, approval numbers 3150–
0011, 3150–0151, and 3150–0039.
and recordkeeping requirements,
Standard design, Standard design
certification.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a request for information or an
information collection requirement
unless the requesting document
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
10 CFR Part 140
Criminal penalties, Extraordinary
nuclear occurrence, Insurance,
Intergovernmental relations, Nuclear
materials, Nuclear power plants and
reactors, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set out in the
preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974,
as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553;
the NRC is adopting the following
amendments to 10 CFR parts 2, 50, 52,
and 140.
VI. Regulatory Analysis
A regulatory analysis has not been
prepared for this regulation. This rule
amends NRC regulations to be
consistent with provisions in the Energy
Policy Act of 2005. This rule does not
involve an exercise of Commission
discretion and, therefore, does not
necessitate preparation of a regulatory
analysis.
VII. Backfit Analysis
The NRC has determined that the
backfit rule does not apply to this final
rule; and therefore, a backfit analysis is
not required for this final rule because
these amendments are mandated by the
Energy Policy Act of 2005.
VIII. Congressional Review Act
In accordance with the Congressional
Review Act, the NRC has determined
that this action is not a major rule and
has verified this determination with the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of OMB.
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and
procedure, Antitrust, Byproduct
material, Classified information,
Environmental protection, Nuclear
materials, Nuclear power plants and
reactors, Penalties, Sex discrimination,
Source material, Special nuclear
material, Waste treatment and disposal.
10 CFR Part 50
Antitrust, Classified information,
Criminal penalties, Fire protection,
Intergovernmental relations, Nuclear
power plants and reactors, Radiation
protection, Reactor siting criteria,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
10 CFR Part 52
Administrative practice and
procedure, Antitrust, Backfitting,
Combined license, Early site permit,
Emergency planning, Fees, Inspection,
Limited work authorization, Nuclear
power plants and reactors, Probabilistic
risk assessment, Prototype, Reactor
siting criteria, Redress of site, Reporting
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 2—RULES OF PRACTICE FOR
DOMESTIC LICENSING PROCEEDINGS
AND ISSUANCE OF ORDERS
1. The authority citation for part 2 is
revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 161, 181, 68 Stat. 948,
953, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201, 2231); sec.
191, as amended, Pub. L. 87–615, 76 Stat. 409
(42 U.S.C. 2241); sec. 201, 88 Stat. 1242, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 5841); 5 U.S.C. 552; sec.
1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note).
Section 2.101 also issued under secs. 53,
62, 63, 81, 103, 104, 68 Stat. 930, 932, 933,
935, 936, 937, 938, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2073, 2092, 2093, 2111, 2133, 2134, 2135);
sec. 114(f), Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2213, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 10143(f)), sec. 102, Pub.
L. 91–190, 83 Stat. 853, as amended (42
U.S.C. 4332); sec. 301, 88 Stat. 1248 (42
U.S.C. 5871).
Sections 2.102, 2.103, 2.104, 2.105, 2.721
also issued under secs. 102, 103, 104, 183i,
189, 68 Stat. 936, 937, 938, 954, 955, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 2132, 2133, 2134, 2135,
2233, 2239). Sections 2.105 also issued under
Pub. L. 97–415, 96 Stat. 2073 (42 U.S.C.
2239).
Sections 2.200–2.206 also issued under
secs. 161b, I, o, 182, 186, 234, 68 Stat. 948–
951, 955, 83 Stat. 444, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2201(b), (I), (o), 2236, 2282); sec. 206, 88 Stat
1246 (42 U.S.C. 5846). Section 2.205(j) also
issued under Pub. L. 101–410, 104 Stat. 90,
as amended by section 3100(s), Pub. L. 104–
134, 110 Stat. 1321–373 (28 U.S.C. 2461
note). Sections 2.600–2.606 also issued under
sec. 102, Pub. L. 91–190, 83 Stat. 853, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4332). Sections 2.700a,
2.719 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 554.
Sections 2.754, 2.760, 2.770, 2.780 also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 557. Section 2.764 also
issued under secs. 135, 141, Pub. L. 97–425,
96 Stat. 2232, 2241 (42 U.S.C. 10155, 10161).
Section 2.790 also issued under sec. 103, 68
Stat. 936, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2133), and
5 U.S.C. 552. Sections 2.800 and 2.808 also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 553. Section 2.809 also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 553, and sec. 29, Pub.
L. 85–256, 71 Stat. 579, as amended (42
U.S.C. 2039). Subpart K also issued under
sec. 189, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 2239); sec.
134, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2230 (42 U.S.C.
10154).
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart L also issued under sec. 189, 68
Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 2239). Subpart M also
issued under sec. 184 (42 U.S.C. 2234) and
sec. 189, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 2239).
Appendix A also issued under sec. 6, Pub. L.
91–560, 84 Stat. 1473 (42 U.S.C. 2135).
2. In § 2.101 paragraphs (a–1)(5) and
(e) are removed, paragraphs (f) and (g)
are redesignated as paragraphs (e) and
(f) respectively, and paragraphs (a)(5),
(a–1) introductory text, and (c) are
revised to read as follows:
I
§ 2.101
Filing of application.
(a) * * *
(5) An applicant for a construction
permit for a production or utilization
facility which is subject to § 51.20(b) of
this chapter, and is of the type specified
in § 50.21(b)(2) or (3) or § 50.22 of this
chapter or is a testing facility may
submit the information required of
applicants by part 50 of the chapter in
two parts. One part shall be
accompanied by the information
required by § 50.30(f) of this chapter,
another part shall include any
information required by § 50.34(a) and,
if applicable, § 50.34a of this chapter.
One part may precede or follow other
parts by no longer than six (6) months.
If it is determined that either of the parts
as described above is incomplete and
not acceptable for processing, the
Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
or Director of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards, as appropriate, will
inform the applicant of this
determination and the respects in which
the document is deficient. Such a
determination of completeness will
generally be made within a period of
thirty (30) days. Whichever part is filed
first shall also include the fee required
by §§ 50.30(e) and 170.21 of this chapter
and the information required by
§§ 50.33, 50.34(a)(1) and 50.37 of this
chapter. The Director of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation or Director of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, as
appropriate, will accept for docketing an
application for a construction permit for
a production or utilization facility
which is subject to § 51.20(b) of this
chapter, and is of the type specified in
§ 50.21(b)(2) or (3) or § 50.22 of this
chapter or is a testing facility where one
part of the application as described
above is complete and conforms to the
requirements of part 50 of this chapter.
The additional parts will be docketed
upon a determination by the Director of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation or Director
of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards, as appropriate, that it is
complete.
(a–1) Early consideration of site
suitability issues. An applicant for a
construction permit for a utilization
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Oct 26, 2005
Jkt 208001
facility which is subject to § 51.20(b) of
this chapter and is of the type specified
in § 50.21(b)(2) or (3) or § 50.22 of this
chapter or is a testing facility, may
request that the Commission conduct an
early review and hearing and render an
early partial decision in accordance
with subpart F on issues of site
suitability within the purview of the
applicable provisions of parts 50, 51 and
100 of this chapter. In such cases, the
applicant for the construction permit
may submit the information required of
applicants by the provisions of this
chapter in three parts:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Upon receipt and acceptance for
docketing of the required portions of the
application dealing with radiological
health and safety and environmental
matters, notice of receipt will be
published in the Federal Register
including an appropriate notice of
hearing.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 2.102
Notice of hearing.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) In an application for a
construction permit or an operating
license for a facility on which a hearing
is required by the Act or this chapter,
the notice of hearing will, unless the
Commission determines otherwise,
state:
(1) A time of the hearing which will
be as soon as practicable after
compliance with section 189a of the Act
and this part;
(2) The presiding officer for the
hearing who shall be either an
administrative law judge or an atomic
safety and licensing board established
by the Commission or by the Chief
Administrative Judge of the Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board Panel; and
*
*
*
*
*
I 5. In § 2.105, paragraph (f) is removed
and paragraph (e)(2) is revised to read
as follows:
§ 2.105
Notice of proposed action.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) If a request for a hearing or a
petition for leave to intervene is filed
within the time prescribed in the notice,
the presiding officer who shall be an
PO 00000
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
established by the Commission or by the
Chief Administrative Judge of the
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
Panel, will rule on the request and/or
petition, and the Secretary or the
presiding officer will issue a notice of
hearing or an appropriate order.
I 6. In § 2.402, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
§ 2.402 Separate hearings on separate
issues; consolidation of proceedings.
(a) In the case of applications under
appendix N of part 52 of this chapter for
construction permits for nuclear power
reactors of a type described in § 50.22 of
this chapter, the Commission or the
presiding officer may order separate
hearings on particular phases of the
proceeding, such as matters related to
the acceptability of the design of the
reactor, in the context of the site
parameters postulated for the design or
environmental matters.
*
*
*
*
*
[Amended]
3. In § 2.102, paragraph (d) is
removed.
I 4. In § 2.104, footnote 4 and paragraph
(d)(3) are removed, paragraph (d)(4) is
redesignated as paragraph (d)(3), the
introductory text of paragraph (d) and
paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) are revised
to read as follows:
I
§ 2.104
61887
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 50—DOMESTIC LICENSING OF
PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION
FACILITIES
7. The authority citation for part 50 is
revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 102, 103, 104, 161, 182,
183, 186, 189, 68 Stat. 936, 937, 938, 948,
953, 954, 955, 956, as amended, sec. 234, 83
Stat. 444, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2132, 2133,
2134, 2135, 2201, 2232, 2233, 2236, 2239,
2282); secs. 201, as amended, 202, 206, 88
Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244, 1246 (42 U.S.C.
5841, 5842, 5846); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750
(44 U.S.C. 3504 note). Section 50.7 also
issued under Pub. L. 95–601, sec. 10, 92 Stat.
2951 (42 U.S.C. 5841). Section 50.10 also
issued under secs. 101, 185, 68 Stat. 955, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 2131, 2235); sec. 102,
Pub. L. 91–190, 83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332).
Sections 50.13, 50.54(dd), and 50.103 also
issued under sec. 108, 68 Stat. 939, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 2138).
Sections 50.23, 50.35, 50.55, and 50.56 also
issued under sec. 185, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C.
2235). Sections 50.33a, 50.55a and Appendix
Q also issued under sec. 102, Pub. L. 91–190,
83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332). Sections 50.34
and 50.54 also issued under sec. 204, 88 Stat.
1245 (42 U.S.C. 5844). Sections 50.58, 50.91,
and 50.92 also issued under Pub. L. 97–415,
96 Stat. 2073 (42 U.S.C. 2239). Section 50.78
also issued under sec. 122, 68 Stat. 939 (42
U.S.C. 2152). Sections 50.80—50.81 also
issued under sec. 184, 68 Stat. 954, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 2234). Appendix F also
issued under sec. 187, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C.
2237).
8. Section 50.8 paragraph (b) is
revised to read as follows:
I
§ 50.8 Information collection
requirements: OMB approval.
*
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
*
*
27OCR1
*
*
61888
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(b) The approved information
collection requirements contained in
this part appear in §§ 50.30, 50.33,
50.34, 50.34a, 50.35, 50.36, 50.36a,
50.36b, 50.44, 50.46, 50.47, 50.48, 50.49,
50.54, 50.55, 50.55a, 50.59, 50.60, 50.61,
50.62, 50.63, 50.64, 50.65, 50.66, 50.68,
50.69, 50.70, 50.71, 50.72, 50.74, 50.75,
50.80, 50.82, 50.90, 50.91, 50.120, and
appendices A, B, E, G, H, I, J, K, M, N,O,
Q, R, and S to this part.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 50.33a
[Removed]
Transfer of licenses.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) An application for transfer of a
license shall include as much of the
information described in §§ 50.33 and
50.34 of this part with respect to the
identity and technical and financial
qualifications of the proposed transferee
as would be required by those sections
if the application were for an initial
license. The Commission may require
additional information such as data
respecting proposed safeguards against
hazards from radioactive materials and
the applicant’s qualifications to protect
against such hazards. The application
shall include also a statement of the
purposes for which the transfer of the
license is requested, the nature of the
transaction necessitating or making
desirable the transfer of the license, and
an agreement to limit access to
Restricted Data pursuant to § 50.37. The
Commission may require any person
who submits an application for license
pursuant to the provisions of this
section to file a written consent from the
existing licensee or a certified copy of
an order or judgment of a court of
competent jurisdiction attesting to the
person’s right (subject to the licensing
requirements of the Act and these
regulations) to possession of the facility
involved.
*
*
*
*
*
Appendix L to Part 50—[Removed and
Reserved]
11. Appendix L to part 50 is removed
and reserved.
I 12. In Appendix N to part 50,
paragraph 2, is revised to read as
follows:
I
Appendix N to Part 50—
Standardization of Nuclear Power Plant
Designs; Licenses To Construct and
Operate Nuclear Power Reactors of
Duplicate Design at Multiple Sites
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
16:58 Oct 26, 2005
Jkt 208001
*
*
*
*
PART 52—EARLY SITE PERMITS;
STANDARD DESIGN
CERTIFICATIONS; AND COMBINED
LICENSES FOR NUCLEAR POWER
PLANTS
13. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
*
*
I
9. Section 50.33a is removed.
10. Section 50.80 paragraph (b) is
revised to read as follows:
I
§ 50.80
2. Applications for construction permits
submitted pursuant to this appendix must
include the information required by §§ 50.33,
50.34(a) and 50.34a(a) and (b) and be
submitted as specified in § 50.4. The
applicant shall also submit the information
required by § 51.50 of this chapter.
Authority: Sec. 161, 68 Stat. 948, as
amended, sec. 274, 73 Stat. 688 (42 U.S.C.
2201, 2021); sec. 201, 88 Stat. 1242, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 5841); sec. 1704, 112
Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note). Sections
150.3, 150.15, 150.15a, 150.31, 150.32 also
issued under secs. 11e(2), 81, 68 Stat. 923,
935, as amended, secs. 83, 84, 92 Stat. 3033,
3039 (42 U.S.C. 2014e(2), 2111, 2113, 2114).
Section 150.14 also issued under sec. 53, 68
Stat. 930, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2073).
Section 150.15 also issued under secs. 135,
141, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2232, 2241 (42
U.S.C. 10155, 10161). Section 150.17a also
issued under sec. 122, 68 Stat. 939 (42 U.S.C.
2152). Section 150.30 also issued under sec.
234, 83 Stat. 444 (42 U.S.C. 2282).
14. Section 52.77 is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 52.77 Contents of applications; general
information.
The application must contain all of
the information required by 10 CFR
50.33, as that section would apply to
applicants for construction permits and
operating licenses.
PART 140—FINANCIAL PROTECTION
REQUIREMENTS AND INDEMNITY
AGREEMENTS
15. The authority citation for part 140
is revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 161, 170, 68 Stat. 948, 71
Stat. 576 as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201, 2210);
secs. 201, as amended, 202, 88 Stat. 1242, as
amended, 1244 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842); sec.
1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note);
Pub. L. 109–58.
16. In § 140.11, paragraph (a)(4) is
revised to read as follows:
I
§ 140.11 Amounts of financial protection
for certain reactors.
(a) * * *
(4) In an amount equal to the sum of
$300,000,000 and the amount available
as secondary financial protection (in the
form of private liability insurance
available under an industry
retrospective rating plan providing for
deferred premium charges equal to the
pro rata share of the aggregate public
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
liability claims and costs, excluding
costs payment of which is not
authorized by section 170o.(1)(D) of the
Act, in excess of that covered by
primary financial protection) for each
nuclear reactor which is licensed to
operate and which is designed for the
production of electrical energy and has
a rated capacity of 100,000 electrical
kilowatts or more: Provided, however,
that under such a plan for deferred
premium charges for each nuclear
reactor which is licensed to operate, no
more than $95,800,000 with respect to
any nuclear incident (plus any
surcharge assessed under subsection
170o.(1)(E) of the Act) and no more than
$15,000,000 per incident within one
calendar year shall be charged. Except
that, where a person is authorized to
operate a combination of 2 or more
nuclear reactors located at a single site,
each of which has a rated capacity of
100,000 or more electrical kilowatts but
not more than 300,000 electrical
kilowatts with a combined rated
capacity of not more than 1,300,000
electrical kilowatts, each such
combination of reactors shall be
considered to be a single nuclear reactor
for the sole purpose of assessing the
applicable financial protection required
under this section.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 11th day
of October, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Luis A. Reyes,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–21342 Filed 10–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 61
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19630; Amendment
No. 61–109]
RIN 2120–AI38
Second-in-Command Pilot Type Rating
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are correcting errors in a
final rule published in the Federal
Register on August 4, 2005. That final
rule revised pilot certification
regulations by establishing a second-incommand (SIC) pilot type rating and
associated qualifying procedures. We
are also correcting cross references and
other minor errors in the pre-existing
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 207 (Thursday, October 27, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61885-61888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21342]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 61885]]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Parts 2, 50, 52, and 140
RIN 3150-AH78
Price-Anderson Act Financial Protection Regulations and
Elimination of Antitrust Reviews
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its
regulations to conform with the requirements of the Energy Policy Act
of 2005. The revised regulations include Congress's prescribed increase
in the amount of the required annual financial contributions required
from commercial reactors in the event of a nuclear accident to pay for
third party liability under the Price-Anderson Act. Another revision
provides Congress's accommodation for modular reactors, which permits a
defined combination of these reactors to be considered a single reactor
for the determination of financial obligations under the Price-Anderson
Act. Additional revisions, essentially deletions, result from
Congress's terminating NRC's authority and responsibility to conduct
antitrust reviews of future applications to construct or operate a
nuclear reactor.
DATES: This rule is effective on November 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marjorie Nordlinger, Senior Attorney,
Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-1616, e-mail
MSN@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Final Rule
III. Voluntary Consensus Standards
IV. Finding of No Significant Impact: Environmental Assessment
V. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
VI. Regulatory Analysis
VII. Backfit Analysis
VIII. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its regulations
to conform with recently enacted provisions contained in the Energy
Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58. In that act, Congress amended
Section 170 of the Atomic Energy Act (the Price-Anderson Act) to
increase the amount reactor licensees must contribute annually to
compensate the public for damages if a nuclear accident occurs.
Congress also provided special treatment for potential licensees of
modular reactors by defining what combination of reactors is entitled
to be considered a single reactor under the Price-Anderson Act for
determining the applicable financial requirements. In the same
legislation, Congress eliminated NRC's authority and responsibility to
conduct antitrust reviews of future applications for a license to
construct or operate a nuclear reactor.
This rule revises the Commission's regulations solely to comply
with the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The changes simply incorporate
mandatory statutory requirements or eliminate authorities and actions
under a Congressional mandate, which by its terms applies only to
future nuclear reactor construction permits and operating license
applications and has no effect on the Commissions' authority relative
to existing nuclear reactor operating license antitrust conditions.
Accordingly, good cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to publish this
final rule without soliciting public comment because the Commission has
no discretion in these matters and public comment would serve no useful
purpose. The revisions are being published as a final rule that will
become effective 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal
Register.
II. Discussion of the Final Rule
A. Antitrust Amendments
The Atomic Energy Commission and its successor the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission have had the authority and obligation to conduct
antitrust reviews of applicants for licenses to construct and operate
nuclear reactors. In determining whether to grant such a license, the
Commission was required to make a finding whether the activities under
the license would create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the
Nation's antitrust laws. Sometimes the Commission has needed to conduct
a lengthy hearing on antitrust issues before issuing its decision. In
recent years, other Government agencies more specialized in financial
matters have demonstrated oversight and authority sufficient to discern
and address potential anticompetitive behavior of nuclear energy
producers. In light of the redundant antitrust responsibilities of the
Commission and those agencies, Congress enacted section 625 of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 which eliminated the Commission's antitrust
authority with respect to future license applications. The final rule's
changes in the regulations remove all antitrust review requirements and
references to the discontinued antitrust review.
B. Price-Anderson Act Amendments
In the event of a serious nuclear accident with substantial offsite
damages, the Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988 required each
licensee of a commercial reactor (one with a rated capacity of 100,000
electrical kilowatts or more) to pay into a retrospective premium pool,
as needed, $10 million annually per reactor up to the sum of $63
million as adjusted for inflation to pay for harm to person or property
caused by the accident. By August 2003, that sum, as adjusted for
inflation, had reached the amount of $95,800,000. In section 603 of The
Energy Policy Act of 2005, Congress replaced the $63 million limit with
the $95,800,000 current limit, already incorporated in the Commission's
rules as the new base for inflation adjustment. Congress also decided
that the $10 million annual payment which had remained unchanged since
1988 should be increased to $15 million and should be adjusted for
inflation in the future. Accordingly, the Commission is changing the
regulation to reflect the current $15 million amount the nuclear
reactor licensees would pay annually if public liability damages
exceeded the insurance required to be carried by the licensee.
In section 608 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Congress
recognized that new designs of reactors known as modular reactors could
result in
[[Page 61886]]
groupings of a smaller capacity reactor than the typical commercial
reactor currently in use, but where each single modular reactor still
exceeds the 100,000 electrical kilowatts that would trigger the
financial obligations currently required of a large reactor. To make
the small modular reactors economically feasible while maintaining for
them an equitable obligation to assure available funds for the public,
the Energy Policy Act provided that a prescribed combination of
facilities should be considered as a single facility for the sole
purpose of assessing financial obligations under the Price-Anderson
Act. The Commission is amending its rules to include the description of
the combination of modular reactors which is to be treated as a single
reactor for assessing obligations to contribute to the pool that will
pay for public harm if a serious nuclear accident occurs.
III. Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995,
Public Law 104-113, requires that Federal agencies use technical
standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies unless the use of such a standard is inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. In this rule, the NRC is
revising its regulations to reflect statutory mandates contained in the
Energy Policy Act of 2005. This action does not constitute the
establishment of a standard that contains generally applicable
requirements.
IV. Finding of No Significant Impact: Environmental Assessment
The Commission has determined under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and the Commission's regulations in
Subpart A of 10 CFR Part 51, that this rule is not a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment
and, therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. The
basis for this determination is that the rule relates to liability
under the Price-Anderson Act and the elimination of NRC's antitrust
reviews. In addition, the changes to the regulations in Parts 2, 50, 52
and 140 are actions that fall within the categorical exclusions set out
in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(1) and (3).
V. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
This final rule does not contain new or amended information
collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing requirements were approved by the
Office of Management and Budget, approval numbers 3150-0011, 3150-0151,
and 3150-0039.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection
requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
VI. Regulatory Analysis
A regulatory analysis has not been prepared for this regulation.
This rule amends NRC regulations to be consistent with provisions in
the Energy Policy Act of 2005. This rule does not involve an exercise
of Commission discretion and, therefore, does not necessitate
preparation of a regulatory analysis.
VII. Backfit Analysis
The NRC has determined that the backfit rule does not apply to this
final rule; and therefore, a backfit analysis is not required for this
final rule because these amendments are mandated by the Energy Policy
Act of 2005.
VIII. Congressional Review Act
In accordance with the Congressional Review Act, the NRC has
determined that this action is not a major rule and has verified this
determination with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of
OMB.
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and procedure, Antitrust, Byproduct
material, Classified information, Environmental protection, Nuclear
materials, Nuclear power plants and reactors, Penalties, Sex
discrimination, Source material, Special nuclear material, Waste
treatment and disposal.
10 CFR Part 50
Antitrust, Classified information, Criminal penalties, Fire
protection, Intergovernmental relations, Nuclear power plants and
reactors, Radiation protection, Reactor siting criteria, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
10 CFR Part 52
Administrative practice and procedure, Antitrust, Backfitting,
Combined license, Early site permit, Emergency planning, Fees,
Inspection, Limited work authorization, Nuclear power plants and
reactors, Probabilistic risk assessment, Prototype, Reactor siting
criteria, Redress of site, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Standard design, Standard design certification.
10 CFR Part 140
Criminal penalties, Extraordinary nuclear occurrence, Insurance,
Intergovernmental relations, Nuclear materials, Nuclear power plants
and reactors, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization Act of
1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553; the NRC is adopting the
following amendments to 10 CFR parts 2, 50, 52, and 140.
PART 2--RULES OF PRACTICE FOR DOMESTIC LICENSING PROCEEDINGS AND
ISSUANCE OF ORDERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 2 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 161, 181, 68 Stat. 948, 953, as amended (42
U.S.C. 2201, 2231); sec. 191, as amended, Pub. L. 87-615, 76 Stat.
409 (42 U.S.C. 2241); sec. 201, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended (42 U.S.C.
5841); 5 U.S.C. 552; sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504
note).
Section 2.101 also issued under secs. 53, 62, 63, 81, 103, 104,
68 Stat. 930, 932, 933, 935, 936, 937, 938, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2073, 2092, 2093, 2111, 2133, 2134, 2135); sec. 114(f), Pub. L. 97-
425, 96 Stat. 2213, as amended (42 U.S.C. 10143(f)), sec. 102, Pub.
L. 91-190, 83 Stat. 853, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4332); sec. 301, 88
Stat. 1248 (42 U.S.C. 5871).
Sections 2.102, 2.103, 2.104, 2.105, 2.721 also issued under
secs. 102, 103, 104, 183i, 189, 68 Stat. 936, 937, 938, 954, 955, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 2132, 2133, 2134, 2135, 2233, 2239). Sections
2.105 also issued under Pub. L. 97-415, 96 Stat. 2073 (42 U.S.C.
2239).
Sections 2.200-2.206 also issued under secs. 161b, I, o, 182,
186, 234, 68 Stat. 948-951, 955, 83 Stat. 444, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2201(b), (I), (o), 2236, 2282); sec. 206, 88 Stat 1246 (42 U.S.C.
5846). Section 2.205(j) also issued under Pub. L. 101-410, 104 Stat.
90, as amended by section 3100(s), Pub. L. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321-
373 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note). Sections 2.600-2.606 also issued under
sec. 102, Pub. L. 91-190, 83 Stat. 853, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4332).
Sections 2.700a, 2.719 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 554. Sections
2.754, 2.760, 2.770, 2.780 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 557. Section
2.764 also issued under secs. 135, 141, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat.
2232, 2241 (42 U.S.C. 10155, 10161). Section 2.790 also issued under
sec. 103, 68 Stat. 936, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2133), and 5 U.S.C.
552. Sections 2.800 and 2.808 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 553.
Section 2.809 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 553, and sec. 29, Pub. L.
85-256, 71 Stat. 579, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2039). Subpart K also
issued under sec. 189, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 2239); sec. 134, Pub.
L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2230 (42 U.S.C. 10154).
[[Page 61887]]
Subpart L also issued under sec. 189, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C.
2239). Subpart M also issued under sec. 184 (42 U.S.C. 2234) and
sec. 189, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 2239). Appendix A also issued
under sec. 6, Pub. L. 91-560, 84 Stat. 1473 (42 U.S.C. 2135).
0
2. In Sec. 2.101 paragraphs (a-1)(5) and (e) are removed, paragraphs
(f) and (g) are redesignated as paragraphs (e) and (f) respectively,
and paragraphs (a)(5), (a-1) introductory text, and (c) are revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 2.101 Filing of application.
(a) * * *
(5) An applicant for a construction permit for a production or
utilization facility which is subject to Sec. 51.20(b) of this
chapter, and is of the type specified in Sec. 50.21(b)(2) or (3) or
Sec. 50.22 of this chapter or is a testing facility may submit the
information required of applicants by part 50 of the chapter in two
parts. One part shall be accompanied by the information required by
Sec. 50.30(f) of this chapter, another part shall include any
information required by Sec. 50.34(a) and, if applicable, Sec. 50.34a
of this chapter. One part may precede or follow other parts by no
longer than six (6) months. If it is determined that either of the
parts as described above is incomplete and not acceptable for
processing, the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation or Director of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, as appropriate, will inform the
applicant of this determination and the respects in which the document
is deficient. Such a determination of completeness will generally be
made within a period of thirty (30) days. Whichever part is filed first
shall also include the fee required by Sec. Sec. 50.30(e) and 170.21
of this chapter and the information required by Sec. Sec. 50.33,
50.34(a)(1) and 50.37 of this chapter. The Director of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation or Director of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, as
appropriate, will accept for docketing an application for a
construction permit for a production or utilization facility which is
subject to Sec. 51.20(b) of this chapter, and is of the type specified
in Sec. 50.21(b)(2) or (3) or Sec. 50.22 of this chapter or is a
testing facility where one part of the application as described above
is complete and conforms to the requirements of part 50 of this
chapter. The additional parts will be docketed upon a determination by
the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation or Director of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, as appropriate, that it is complete.
(a-1) Early consideration of site suitability issues. An applicant
for a construction permit for a utilization facility which is subject
to Sec. 51.20(b) of this chapter and is of the type specified in Sec.
50.21(b)(2) or (3) or Sec. 50.22 of this chapter or is a testing
facility, may request that the Commission conduct an early review and
hearing and render an early partial decision in accordance with subpart
F on issues of site suitability within the purview of the applicable
provisions of parts 50, 51 and 100 of this chapter. In such cases, the
applicant for the construction permit may submit the information
required of applicants by the provisions of this chapter in three
parts:
* * * * *
(c) Upon receipt and acceptance for docketing of the required
portions of the application dealing with radiological health and safety
and environmental matters, notice of receipt will be published in the
Federal Register including an appropriate notice of hearing.
* * * * *
Sec. 2.102 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 2.102, paragraph (d) is removed.
0
4. In Sec. 2.104, footnote 4 and paragraph (d)(3) are removed,
paragraph (d)(4) is redesignated as paragraph (d)(3), the introductory
text of paragraph (d) and paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) are revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 2.104 Notice of hearing.
* * * * *
(d) In an application for a construction permit or an operating
license for a facility on which a hearing is required by the Act or
this chapter, the notice of hearing will, unless the Commission
determines otherwise, state:
(1) A time of the hearing which will be as soon as practicable
after compliance with section 189a of the Act and this part;
(2) The presiding officer for the hearing who shall be either an
administrative law judge or an atomic safety and licensing board
established by the Commission or by the Chief Administrative Judge of
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel; and
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 2.105, paragraph (f) is removed and paragraph (e)(2) is
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 2.105 Notice of proposed action.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) If a request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene
is filed within the time prescribed in the notice, the presiding
officer who shall be an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board established
by the Commission or by the Chief Administrative Judge of the Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the request and/or
petition, and the Secretary or the presiding officer will issue a
notice of hearing or an appropriate order.
0
6. In Sec. 2.402, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 2.402 Separate hearings on separate issues; consolidation of
proceedings.
(a) In the case of applications under appendix N of part 52 of this
chapter for construction permits for nuclear power reactors of a type
described in Sec. 50.22 of this chapter, the Commission or the
presiding officer may order separate hearings on particular phases of
the proceeding, such as matters related to the acceptability of the
design of the reactor, in the context of the site parameters postulated
for the design or environmental matters.
* * * * *
PART 50--DOMESTIC LICENSING OF PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION
FACILITIES
0
7. The authority citation for part 50 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 102, 103, 104, 161, 182, 183, 186, 189, 68
Stat. 936, 937, 938, 948, 953, 954, 955, 956, as amended, sec. 234,
83 Stat. 444, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2132, 2133, 2134, 2135, 2201,
2232, 2233, 2236, 2239, 2282); secs. 201, as amended, 202, 206, 88
Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244, 1246 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846);
sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note). Section 50.7 also
issued under Pub. L. 95-601, sec. 10, 92 Stat. 2951 (42 U.S.C.
5841). Section 50.10 also issued under secs. 101, 185, 68 Stat. 955,
as amended (42 U.S.C. 2131, 2235); sec. 102, Pub. L. 91-190, 83
Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332). Sections 50.13, 50.54(dd), and 50.103
also issued under sec. 108, 68 Stat. 939, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2138).
Sections 50.23, 50.35, 50.55, and 50.56 also issued under sec.
185, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 2235). Sections 50.33a, 50.55a and
Appendix Q also issued under sec. 102, Pub. L. 91-190, 83 Stat. 853
(42 U.S.C. 4332). Sections 50.34 and 50.54 also issued under sec.
204, 88 Stat. 1245 (42 U.S.C. 5844). Sections 50.58, 50.91, and
50.92 also issued under Pub. L. 97-415, 96 Stat. 2073 (42 U.S.C.
2239). Section 50.78 also issued under sec. 122, 68 Stat. 939 (42
U.S.C. 2152). Sections 50.80--50.81 also issued under sec. 184, 68
Stat. 954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2234). Appendix F also issued under
sec. 187, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 2237).
0
8. Section 50.8 paragraph (b) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 50.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval.
* * * * *
[[Page 61888]]
(b) The approved information collection requirements contained in
this part appear in Sec. Sec. 50.30, 50.33, 50.34, 50.34a, 50.35,
50.36, 50.36a, 50.36b, 50.44, 50.46, 50.47, 50.48, 50.49, 50.54, 50.55,
50.55a, 50.59, 50.60, 50.61, 50.62, 50.63, 50.64, 50.65, 50.66, 50.68,
50.69, 50.70, 50.71, 50.72, 50.74, 50.75, 50.80, 50.82, 50.90, 50.91,
50.120, and appendices A, B, E, G, H, I, J, K, M, N,O, Q, R, and S to
this part.
* * * * *
Sec. 50.33a [Removed]
0
9. Section 50.33a is removed.
0
10. Section 50.80 paragraph (b) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 50.80 Transfer of licenses.
* * * * *
(b) An application for transfer of a license shall include as much
of the information described in Sec. Sec. 50.33 and 50.34 of this part
with respect to the identity and technical and financial qualifications
of the proposed transferee as would be required by those sections if
the application were for an initial license. The Commission may require
additional information such as data respecting proposed safeguards
against hazards from radioactive materials and the applicant's
qualifications to protect against such hazards. The application shall
include also a statement of the purposes for which the transfer of the
license is requested, the nature of the transaction necessitating or
making desirable the transfer of the license, and an agreement to limit
access to Restricted Data pursuant to Sec. 50.37. The Commission may
require any person who submits an application for license pursuant to
the provisions of this section to file a written consent from the
existing licensee or a certified copy of an order or judgment of a
court of competent jurisdiction attesting to the person's right
(subject to the licensing requirements of the Act and these
regulations) to possession of the facility involved.
* * * * *
Appendix L to Part 50--[Removed and Reserved]
0
11. Appendix L to part 50 is removed and reserved.
0
12. In Appendix N to part 50, paragraph 2, is revised to read as
follows:
Appendix N to Part 50--Standardization of Nuclear Power Plant Designs;
Licenses To Construct and Operate Nuclear Power Reactors of Duplicate
Design at Multiple Sites
* * * * *
2. Applications for construction permits submitted pursuant to
this appendix must include the information required by Sec. Sec.
50.33, 50.34(a) and 50.34a(a) and (b) and be submitted as specified
in Sec. 50.4. The applicant shall also submit the information
required by Sec. 51.50 of this chapter.
* * * * *
PART 52--EARLY SITE PERMITS; STANDARD DESIGN CERTIFICATIONS; AND
COMBINED LICENSES FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
0
13. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 161, 68 Stat. 948, as amended, sec. 274, 73
Stat. 688 (42 U.S.C. 2201, 2021); sec. 201, 88 Stat. 1242, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 5841); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504
note). Sections 150.3, 150.15, 150.15a, 150.31, 150.32 also issued
under secs. 11e(2), 81, 68 Stat. 923, 935, as amended, secs. 83, 84,
92 Stat. 3033, 3039 (42 U.S.C. 2014e(2), 2111, 2113, 2114). Section
150.14 also issued under sec. 53, 68 Stat. 930, as amended (42
U.S.C. 2073). Section 150.15 also issued under secs. 135, 141, Pub.
L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2232, 2241 (42 U.S.C. 10155, 10161). Section
150.17a also issued under sec. 122, 68 Stat. 939 (42 U.S.C. 2152).
Section 150.30 also issued under sec. 234, 83 Stat. 444 (42 U.S.C.
2282).
0
14. Section 52.77 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 52.77 Contents of applications; general information.
The application must contain all of the information required by 10
CFR 50.33, as that section would apply to applicants for construction
permits and operating licenses.
PART 140--FINANCIAL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS AND INDEMNITY
AGREEMENTS
0
15. The authority citation for part 140 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 161, 170, 68 Stat. 948, 71 Stat. 576 as amended
(42 U.S.C. 2201, 2210); secs. 201, as amended, 202, 88 Stat. 1242,
as amended, 1244 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750
(44 U.S.C. 3504 note); Pub. L. 109-58.
0
16. In Sec. 140.11, paragraph (a)(4) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 140.11 Amounts of financial protection for certain reactors.
(a) * * *
(4) In an amount equal to the sum of $300,000,000 and the amount
available as secondary financial protection (in the form of private
liability insurance available under an industry retrospective rating
plan providing for deferred premium charges equal to the pro rata share
of the aggregate public liability claims and costs, excluding costs
payment of which is not authorized by section 170o.(1)(D) of the Act,
in excess of that covered by primary financial protection) for each
nuclear reactor which is licensed to operate and which is designed for
the production of electrical energy and has a rated capacity of 100,000
electrical kilowatts or more: Provided, however, that under such a plan
for deferred premium charges for each nuclear reactor which is licensed
to operate, no more than $95,800,000 with respect to any nuclear
incident (plus any surcharge assessed under subsection 170o.(1)(E) of
the Act) and no more than $15,000,000 per incident within one calendar
year shall be charged. Except that, where a person is authorized to
operate a combination of 2 or more nuclear reactors located at a single
site, each of which has a rated capacity of 100,000 or more electrical
kilowatts but not more than 300,000 electrical kilowatts with a
combined rated capacity of not more than 1,300,000 electrical
kilowatts, each such combination of reactors shall be considered to be
a single nuclear reactor for the sole purpose of assessing the
applicable financial protection required under this section.
* * * * *
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 11th day of October, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Luis A. Reyes,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 05-21342 Filed 10-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P