Eldorado National Forest, CA; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement To Designate Routes for Public Off-Highway Wheeled Motor Vehicles, 61778-61781 [05-21340]
Download as PDF
61778
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices
documentation for the EIS. Additional
scoping will follow the release of the
DEIS, expected in January 2006. This
proposal also includes openings greater
than 40 acres. A 60-day public review
period was initiated with the scoping of
this project on May 16, 2001. Approval
to exceed the 40-acre limitation was
received from the Regional Forester on
March 21, 2003.
Preliminary Issues that could be
affected by proposed activities include
aesthetics/scenery; air quality;
economics; fuels treatment; future
management accessibility; heritage
resources; old growth; retention of live
and dead trees; riparian areas; size of
openings; soil compaction and
productivity; threatened, endangered,
sensitive, and management indicator
specifies of wildlife, fish and plants;
tribal treaty rights; and water quality.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 533 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Oct 25, 2005
Jkt 208001
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21.
Dated: October 19, 2005.
Thomas K. Reilly,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05–21334 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Eldorado National Forest, CA; Notice
of Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement To Designate Routes
for Public Off-Highway Wheeled Motor
Vehicles
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will
prepare an environmental impact
statement to designate a portion of the
inventoried routes on the Eldorado
National Forest open to public offhighway wheeled motor vehicle 1 use,
and assign the type of use(s) and season
of use allowed on each road and trail or
portion thereof. Inventoried routes not
selected for designation for public offhighway wheeled motor vehicle use will
be closed to public wheeled motor
vehicles year round. Eldorado National
Forest maintenance level 3, 4, and 5
system roads subject to the Federal
Highway Safety Act are currently
designated open to highway legal
vehicles. The Forest Supervisor will not
propose to redesignate these roads for
off-highway wheeled motor vehicles.
The Rock Creek multi-use trail area on
1 The term off-highway wheeled motor vehicle in
this proposal means ‘‘any (wheeled) motorized
vehicle designed or capable of cross-country travel
on or immediately over land, water, sand, snow,
ice, marsh, swampland, or other natural terrain
* * * ’’ (Executive Order 11644, as amended).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Eldorado National Forest is not
affected by this decision and is outside
the scope of the project.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
action should be submitted within 30
days of the date of publication of this
Notice of Intent. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected by June 2006 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected in October 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
John D. Berry, Forest Supervisor,
Eldorado National Forest, 100 Forni
Road, Placerville, CA 95667.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony V. Scardina, Route Designation
Interdisciplinary Team Leader, Eldorado
National Forest Supervisor’s Office by
telephone at (530) 621–5276, FAX (530)
621–5297, or by e-mail at
ascardina@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
It is Forest Service policy to provide
a diversity of road and trail
opportunities for experiencing a variety
of environments and modes of travel
consistent with the National Forest
recreation role and land capability (FSM
2353.03(2)). Modes of travel include
hiking, horseback riding, motor biking,
and so forth (FSM 2353.2). The
Eldorado National Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan (ENF
LRMP) prohibits wheeled vehicle travel
off of designated roads, trails, and
limited off-highway vehicle (OHV) use
areas (Sierra Nevada Forest Plan
Amendment (SNFPA) Record of
Decision (ROD), January 2004, S&G
#69).
In recent years, the use of OHVs
across the Eldorado National Forest has
increased substantially. This increased
use has led to development of usercreated trails, increased conflict
between motorized and non-motorized
uses; complaints about noise from
adjacent landowners; and areas of
degraded soil, water, vegetation, and
wildlife habitat conditions. The current
route inventory for Eldorado National
Forest identified approximately 2,830
miles of roads and trails currently
receiving some level of OHV use. Of
these, 2,110 miles of National Forest
System roads and trails are managed for
OHV use.
The underlying need for this proposal
is to designate routes for public offhighway wheeled motor vehicle use on
the Eldorado National Forest. In meeting
this need, the selection of designated
routes shall achieve the following
purposes:
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices
Compliance With Code of Federal
Regulation
• Minimize damage to soil,
watersheds, vegetation, or other
resources (36 CFR 295.2(b)(1)).
• Minimize soil erosion and
compaction of soils resulting in loss of
soil productivity and sedimentation to
waterways.
• Minimize disturbance and
sedimentation to riparian areas,
wetlands, and waterways adversely
impacting fish, amphibians, and
wildlife.
• Minimize spread of invasive, nonnative, and noxious weeds along travel
routes.
• Minimize disturbance,
displacement of artifacts, destruction,
and malicious access (including theft) to
historic and archaeological sites.
• Prevent the creation of additional
routes in environmentally sensitive
areas.
• Minimize harassment of wildlife or
significant disruption of wildlife habitat
(36 CFR 295.2(b)(2)).
• Minimize disturbance and impacts
to wildlife and botanical resources.
• Minimize conflicts between offhighway vehicle use and other existing
or proposed recreational uses of the
same or neighboring public lands (36
CFR 295.2(b)(3)).
• Balance recreational uses, including
campers, hunters, anglers, hikers,
mountain biking, equestrians, wildlife
viewers, photographers, and motorized
OHV users, to minimize conflicts.
• Minimize conflicts between
motorized OHV use and other forest
permittees (e.g., recreation residences,
range permittees, campground
concessionaires, outfitters, and guides).
• Ensure the compatibility of OHV
use with existing conditions in
populated areas, taking into account
noise and other factors (36 CFR
295.2(b)(3)).
• Minimize adverse impacts to air
quality (e.g., dust and exhaust).
• Minimize conflict between OHV
use and private landowners (e.g.,
trespass, noise, dust, exhaust,
vandalism).
Compliance with standards and
guidelines in the Eldorado National
Forest Land and Resource Management
Plan as amended by the Sierra Nevada
Forest Plan Amendment, January 2004
(Numerous standards and guidelines
apply to the designation and use of OHV
routes. However, the following
standards and guidelines are those
directly applicable to the purpose and
need for this proposal).
• Prohibit wheeled vehicle travel off
of designated roads, trails, and limited
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Oct 25, 2005
Jkt 208001
OHV use areas (SNFPA ROD, Standard
and Guideline 69, page 59).
• Maintenance level 2 forest roads
will generally be designated as open to
green sticker OHV use unless adverse
environmental impacts or conflicts with
other uses are identified (ENF LRMP,
Management Practice 27, page 4–83).
• Selected maintenance level 1 forest
roads (currently blocked) may be
designated for OHV use if such use is
not found to be in conflict with the
original reason for closing the road ENF
LRMP, Management Practice 27, page 4–
83).
• Selected maintenance level 3, 4,
and 5 Forest roads may be considered
for combined use designation where
their use would enhance opportunities
for OHVs and would not conflict with
other uses or resource considerations
(ENF LRMP, Management Practice, page
4–83).
• In each deer herd winter range and
fawning areas, motorized trails will be
limited to an average of 2.5 miles per
square mile. Open roads will be limited
to an average of 2.5 miles per square
mile (ENF LRMP, Management Practice
27, page 4–84).
• A closure plan will be instituted for
motorized use, during wet weather
periods to reduce damage to native
surface trails. The plan will allow for
trails to be open when soil conditions
permit (ENF LRMP, Management
Practice 27, page 4–84).
• Stabilize the surface of roads
available for all weather use (ENF
LRMP, Management Practice 102, page
4–107). Confine use to the dry seasons
except on stabilized roads and trails
(ENF LRMP, Management Practice 27,
page 4–288).
• Roads and trails for which required
rights-of-way do not exist and those
located predominantly on private land
will not be designated for OHV use
* * * (ENF LRMP, Management
Practice 27, page 4–84).
Consistency With the Memorandum of
Intent Between the USDA Forest
Service and the California Off-Highway
Motor Vehicle Recreation Commission,
and the Off-Highway Motor Vehicle
Recreation Division of the California
Department of Parks and Recreation
• Designate OHV roads, trails, and
specifically defined open areas for
motorized wheeled vehicles on maps of
the 19 National Forests in California.
• Improve management of OHV use
on National Forest System lands in
California by accomplishing the
following: ‘‘ * * * (3) designate trails,
roads, and specifically defined open
areas for OHV use; (4) develop Forest
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61779
Orders to protect natural resources and
aid law enforcement.* * * ’’
Compliance With the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of
California (Case CIV–S–02–0325 LKK/
JFM, August 16, 2005, Senior Judge
Lawrence K. Karlton)
• Issue a Final Environmental Impact
Statement and Record of Decision on a
new ENF OHV Plan to be consistent
with regional guidelines for OHV route
designation, with new national OHV
regulations which the Forest Service
expects will be promulgated later this
year, and with the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act and
the National Forest Management Act.
Additional Purpose and Needs
Identified from Public Input
• Provide for a safe and sustainable
variety of OHV access and
opportunities. Ensure a balance of 4X4,
ATV, and motorcycle routes.
• Provide motorized access to heavily
used and traditional dispersed sites and
destinations.
• Consider designating existing nonsystem routes that create loops, thruroutes, and/or bypass sensitive areas.
• Review and evaluate previous
decisions of OHV road closures and
restrictions.
• Review and evaluate the current
assignment of maintenance levels of
system roads, and modify where
appropriate.
Proposed Action
The Eldorado National Forest
Supervisor proposes to designate
National Forest System maintenance
level 1 roads (‘‘closed to vehicular
traffic’’), maintenance level 2 roads
(‘‘open for use by high clearance
vehicles’’), and system motorized trails
open to specific types of public offhighway wheeled motor vehicle use and
for season of use. Eldorado National
Forest maintenance level 3, 4, and 5
system roads subject to the Federal
Highway Safety Act are currently
designated open to highway legal
vehicles. The Forest Supervisor will not
propose to redesignate these roads for
off-highway wheeled motor vehicles;
however, portions of these roads may be
designated for combined use of highway
legal and off-highway wheeled motor
vehicles. The Forest Supervisor will
also consider non-system motor vehicle
routes in the current route inventory for
designation as system roads or trails or
specific types of public off-highway
wheeled motor vehicle use and for
season of use. Entire roads or road
segments may be added to the road
system or assigned a dual designation as
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
61780
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices
a National Forest System trail. This
proposal specifically considers:
• Approximately 590 miles of
maintenance level 1 roads to be
designated as system trails for ATVs
and/or motorcycles.
• Approximately 990 miles of
maintenance level 2 roads to be
designated for 4×4s, ATVs, and/or
motorcycles.
• Approximately 130 miles of native
surface maintenance level 3 roads to be
reassigned as maintenance level 2 roads
for 4×4x, ATVs, and/or motorcycles.
• Approximately 3 miles of
maintenance level 3, 4, 5 roads to be
designated for combined use of highway
legal and off-highway wheeled motor
vehicles.
• Approximately 136 miles of system
motorized trails to be designated for
ATVs and/or motorcycles.
• Approximately 11 miles of nonsystem routes in the current route
inventory to be designated as
maintenance level 2 roads for 4×4s,
ATVs, and/or motorcycles.
• Approximately 3 miles of nonsystem routes in the current route
inventory to be designated as system
trails for ATVs and/or motorcycles.
All routes designated for public offhighway wheeled motor vehicle use will
meet the standards and guidelines in the
ENF LRMP as amended by the SNFPA.
All native surface routes designated for
public off-highway wheeled motor
vehicle use will be closed from
November 1 to May 1 each year.
Inventoried routes not selected for
designation for public off-highway
wheeled motor vehicle use will be
closed to public wheeled motor vehicles
year round. The Rock Creek multi-use
trail area on the Eldorado National
Forest is not affected by this decision
and is outside the scope of the project.
Travel off of designated routes will be
prohibited. Such designations and
restrictions will be implemented by a
issuing a forest order, pursuant to 36
CFR 261.
This proposal involves the
designation of routes only and in no
way authorizes any ground disturbing
activities, including: (1) The
construction of new routes; (2) the
deconstruction or decommissioning of
inventoried routes; (3) the
reconstruction of road or trails; (4) the
construction of trailheads, staging areas,
or parking areas; (5) the installation of
gates or barriers; (6) restoration/
rehabilitation projects; or (7) wheeled
motor vehicle use of dispersed camping
sites.
The following uses are not affected by
this decision and are outside the scope
of the project: (1) Highway legal (non-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Oct 25, 2005
Jkt 208001
green sticker) vehicle use of National
Forest System roads subject to the
Federal Highway Safety Act, as well as
state and county roads; (2)
snowmobiles; (3) aircraft; (4) watercraft;
(5) non-motorized uses (e.g. hiking,
equestrian, mountain bikes); (6) search
and rescue operations; (7) firefighting
operations and other emergency
incident operations; (8) law enforcement
operations; (9) special events (event
only trails); (10) permitted uses (e.g.
woodcutting, livestock herding/fence
maintenance); (11) administrative
access; (12) government contractors (e.g.
timber, construction, and service
contractors); and Homeland Security
and Defense Department operations;
(13) access by wheelchairs (motorized or
non-motorized); (14) legal ingress and
egress to private land; (15) RS 2477
claims and processes; (16) the Rock
Creek multi-use trail area (under
separate EIS and supplement); (17) the
designation of inventoried roadless
areas or proposed wilderness additions;
and (18) changes to ENF LRMP land-use
allocations.
Responsible Official
John D. Berry, Forest Supervisor,
Eldorado National Forest, 100 Forni
Road, Placerville, CA 95667.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The responsible official will decide
whether to adopt and implement the
proposed action, an alternative to the
proposed action, or take no action to
designate a portion of the inventoried
routes on the Eldorado National Forest
open to public off-highway wheeled
motor vehicle use, and assign the type
of use(s) and season of use allowed on
each road and trail or portion thereof.
Inventoried routes not selected for
designation for public off-highway
wheeled motor vehicle use will be
closed to all wheeled motor vehicles
year round. The Rock Creek multi-use
trail area on the Eldorado National
Forest is not affected by this decision
and is outside the scope of the project.
Travel off of designated routes will be
prohibited. Such designations and
restrictions will be implemented by a
issuing a forest order (pursuant to 36
CFR 261).
Scoping Process
Public participation will be especially
important at several points during the
analysis. The Forest Service will be
seeking information, comments, and
assistance from the Federal, State, and
local agencies and other individuals or
organizations who may be interested in
or affected by the proposed action.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Notice of Intent is expected to be
published in the Federal Register on
October 29, 2005. The comment period
on the proposed action will extend 30
days from the date the Notice of Intent
is published in the Federal Register.
The draft environmental impact
statement is expected to be filed with
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and to be available for public
review by June 2006. EPA will publish
a notice of availability of the draft EIS
in the Federal Register. The comment
period on the draft EIS will extend 45
days from the date the EPA notice
appears in the Federal Register. At that
time, copies of the draft EIS will be
distributed to interested and affected
agencies, organizations, and members of
the public for their review and
comment. It is very important that those
interested in the management of the
Eldorado National Forest participate at
that time.
The final EIS is scheduled to be
completed in October 2006. In the final
EIS, the Forest Service is required to
respond to substantive comments
received during the comment period
that pertain to the environmental
consequences discussed in the draft EIS
and applicable laws, regulations, and
policies considered in making the
decision regarding route designation.
Substantive comments are defined as
‘‘comments within the scope of the
proposed action, specific to the
proposed action, and have a direct
relationship to the proposed action, and
include supporting reasons for the
Responsible Official to consider’’ (36
CFR 215.2). Submission of substantive
comments is a prerequisite for eligibility
to appeal under the 36 CFR part 215
regulations.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft supplemental
environmental impact statements must
structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so
that it is meaningful and alerts an
agency to the reviewer’s position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553
(1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft
supplemental environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
supplemental environmental impact
statement may be waived or dismissed
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices
by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel,
803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and
Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this
proposed action participate by the close
of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections
are made available to the Forest Service
at a time when it can meaningfully
consider them and respond to them in
the final supplemental environmental
impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposed and will
be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21.
Dated: October 20, 2005.
John D. Berry,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05–21340 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Rocky Mountain Region; Grand Mesa,
Uncompahgre and Gunnison National
Forest; Mesa County, CO; Hunter
Reservoir Expansion Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In order to provide additional
water storage capacity for a growing
population in the Grand Junction Area,
Ute Water Conservancy District (UWCD)
is proposing to enlarge Hunter Reservoir
while also addressing dam safety issues.
The existing reservoir is 16 surface
acres. The proposed expanded reservoir
would be approximately 80 surface
acres.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Oct 25, 2005
Jkt 208001
Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
November 28, 2005. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected in March 2006 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected in September 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Hunter Reservoir Project, Grand Valley
Ranger district, 2777 Crossroads Blvd,
Unit 1, Grand Junction, Colorado 81506.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carrie Surber, Team leader at
csurber@fs.fed.us or (970) 242–8211.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Ute Water
Conservancy District (UWCD) has
decreed water rights for 110 acre-feet
(AF) of storage in Hunter Reservoir
located near the headwaters of Leon
Creek. Leon Creek is located on the
northern slopes of the Grand Mesa, a
prominent geologic feature in Mesa,
Delta and Gunnison Counties in western
Colorado. The Hunter Reservoir project
location is located approximately 11
miles south of Vega Reservoir in Section
27, T. 11 S., R. 93 W. Sixth Principle
Meridian, Mesa County, Colorado.
UWCD also has conditional rights to
store 582.5 AF more water at the Hunter
Reservoir location. In addition to the
Hunter Reservoir water rights, UWCD
have conditional water rights for 5,650
AF of storage at a Big Park site, also in
the Leon Creek drainage basin
downstream of Hunter Reservoir. UWCD
has determined that a new dam at the
Big Park site would not be economically
feasible for the volume of water they
would be allowed to store. UWCD
desires to perfect its Big Park
conditional water rights at the Hunter
Reservoir location by enlarging the
existing dam and reservoir.
Irrespective of UWCD’s storage and
conditional water right desires, the
Colorado Dam Safety Engineer is
requiring UWCD to make structural
improvements to the existing Hunter
Reservoir dam in order to keep using
that facility to store water.
UWCD would like to address both of
these aspects of their water facility’s
management and responsibilities by
enlarging the dam at Hunter Reservoir to
both rectify dam safety concerns and
put their conditional water rights to
beneficial use.
The U.S.D.A Forest Service and the
Army Corps of Engineers, as a requested
cooperating agency, will prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
addressing the environmental
consequences associated with
rehabilitating the dam and enlarging the
reservoir at the Hunter Reservoir
location.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61781
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the proposed action is
to bring the Hunter Reservoir dam into
compliance with Colorado Dam Safety
requirements and to enlarge the storage
capacity of the reservoir so that UWCD
can make beneficial use of its existing
and conditional water rights in the Leon
Creek drainage basin.
The need for this combined action is
to afford UWCD the ability to address
both the dam safety and water right use
aspects of their water facilities
management and responsibilities in a
manner that is environmentally,
economically, and technically sound.
The dam safety issues at Hunter
Reservoir go back as far as 1964 when
state inspection reports began to
identify safety concerns at the existing
dam. These 1964 concerns and others
have continued to worsen to the extent
that actions to rectify dam safety
problems must be addressed by UWCD
to continue operations at Hunter
Reservoir.
UWCD needs include providing a
continued supply of water to meet the
public needs for a service area that is
experiencing continued and rapid
growth. As a public utility, UWCD has
a responsibility to operate and manage
its facilities with respect to feature
demand with sound environmental and
economic management.
This proposed action will also meet
the intent of the 2004 Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between the
Rocky Mountain Region of the Forest
Service and the State of Colorado,
which states, in part, that the State and
Forest Service agree to explore creative
ways to assure continued operation of
water use facilities on NFS lands while
protecting aquatic resources, that
conflicts are best avoided by careful
advance planning and a spirit of
cooperation, and that reauthorization of
existing water facilities will be done in
cooperation and collaboration with the
holders of the permits and with other
parties such as local governments,
tribes, and state and federal agencies, as
appropriate.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to authorize
Ute Water Conservancy District (UWCD)
to enlarge Hunter Reservoir and
rehabilitate the dam to address safety
issues. The construction necessary to
accomplish these actions is expected to
take two summer seasons due to the
high elevation of the Hunter Reservoir
site. UWCD would like to begin
construction in the summer of 2007 and
anticipates completion at the end of the
summer in 2008.
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61778-61781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21340]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Eldorado National Forest, CA; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement To Designate Routes for Public Off-
Highway Wheeled Motor Vehicles
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement to designate a portion of the inventoried routes on the
Eldorado National Forest open to public off-highway wheeled motor
vehicle \1\ use, and assign the type of use(s) and season of use
allowed on each road and trail or portion thereof. Inventoried routes
not selected for designation for public off-highway wheeled motor
vehicle use will be closed to public wheeled motor vehicles year round.
Eldorado National Forest maintenance level 3, 4, and 5 system roads
subject to the Federal Highway Safety Act are currently designated open
to highway legal vehicles. The Forest Supervisor will not propose to
redesignate these roads for off-highway wheeled motor vehicles. The
Rock Creek multi-use trail area on the Eldorado National Forest is not
affected by this decision and is outside the scope of the project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The term off-highway wheeled motor vehicle in this proposal
means ``any (wheeled) motorized vehicle designed or capable of
cross-country travel on or immediately over land, water, sand, snow,
ice, marsh, swampland, or other natural terrain * * * '' (Executive
Order 11644, as amended).
DATES: Comments on the proposed action should be submitted within 30
days of the date of publication of this Notice of Intent. The draft
environmental impact statement is expected by June 2006 and the final
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
environmental impact statement is expected in October 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to John D. Berry, Forest Supervisor,
Eldorado National Forest, 100 Forni Road, Placerville, CA 95667.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony V. Scardina, Route Designation
Interdisciplinary Team Leader, Eldorado National Forest Supervisor's
Office by telephone at (530) 621-5276, FAX (530) 621-5297, or by e-mail
at ascardina@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
It is Forest Service policy to provide a diversity of road and
trail opportunities for experiencing a variety of environments and
modes of travel consistent with the National Forest recreation role and
land capability (FSM 2353.03(2)). Modes of travel include hiking,
horseback riding, motor biking, and so forth (FSM 2353.2). The Eldorado
National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (ENF LRMP) prohibits
wheeled vehicle travel off of designated roads, trails, and limited
off-highway vehicle (OHV) use areas (Sierra Nevada Forest Plan
Amendment (SNFPA) Record of Decision (ROD), January 2004, S&G
69).
In recent years, the use of OHVs across the Eldorado National
Forest has increased substantially. This increased use has led to
development of user-created trails, increased conflict between
motorized and non-motorized uses; complaints about noise from adjacent
landowners; and areas of degraded soil, water, vegetation, and wildlife
habitat conditions. The current route inventory for Eldorado National
Forest identified approximately 2,830 miles of roads and trails
currently receiving some level of OHV use. Of these, 2,110 miles of
National Forest System roads and trails are managed for OHV use.
The underlying need for this proposal is to designate routes for
public off-highway wheeled motor vehicle use on the Eldorado National
Forest. In meeting this need, the selection of designated routes shall
achieve the following purposes:
[[Page 61779]]
Compliance With Code of Federal Regulation
Minimize damage to soil, watersheds, vegetation, or other
resources (36 CFR 295.2(b)(1)).
Minimize soil erosion and compaction of soils resulting in
loss of soil productivity and sedimentation to waterways.
Minimize disturbance and sedimentation to riparian areas,
wetlands, and waterways adversely impacting fish, amphibians, and
wildlife.
Minimize spread of invasive, non-native, and noxious weeds
along travel routes.
Minimize disturbance, displacement of artifacts,
destruction, and malicious access (including theft) to historic and
archaeological sites.
Prevent the creation of additional routes in
environmentally sensitive areas.
Minimize harassment of wildlife or significant disruption
of wildlife habitat (36 CFR 295.2(b)(2)).
Minimize disturbance and impacts to wildlife and botanical
resources.
Minimize conflicts between off-highway vehicle use and
other existing or proposed recreational uses of the same or neighboring
public lands (36 CFR 295.2(b)(3)).
Balance recreational uses, including campers, hunters,
anglers, hikers, mountain biking, equestrians, wildlife viewers,
photographers, and motorized OHV users, to minimize conflicts.
Minimize conflicts between motorized OHV use and other
forest permittees (e.g., recreation residences, range permittees,
campground concessionaires, outfitters, and guides).
Ensure the compatibility of OHV use with existing
conditions in populated areas, taking into account noise and other
factors (36 CFR 295.2(b)(3)).
Minimize adverse impacts to air quality (e.g., dust and
exhaust).
Minimize conflict between OHV use and private landowners
(e.g., trespass, noise, dust, exhaust, vandalism).
Compliance with standards and guidelines in the Eldorado National
Forest Land and Resource Management Plan as amended by the Sierra
Nevada Forest Plan Amendment, January 2004 (Numerous standards and
guidelines apply to the designation and use of OHV routes. However, the
following standards and guidelines are those directly applicable to the
purpose and need for this proposal).
Prohibit wheeled vehicle travel off of designated roads,
trails, and limited OHV use areas (SNFPA ROD, Standard and Guideline
69, page 59).
Maintenance level 2 forest roads will generally be
designated as open to green sticker OHV use unless adverse
environmental impacts or conflicts with other uses are identified (ENF
LRMP, Management Practice 27, page 4-83).
Selected maintenance level 1 forest roads (currently
blocked) may be designated for OHV use if such use is not found to be
in conflict with the original reason for closing the road ENF LRMP,
Management Practice 27, page 4-83).
Selected maintenance level 3, 4, and 5 Forest roads may be
considered for combined use designation where their use would enhance
opportunities for OHVs and would not conflict with other uses or
resource considerations (ENF LRMP, Management Practice, page 4-83).
In each deer herd winter range and fawning areas,
motorized trails will be limited to an average of 2.5 miles per square
mile. Open roads will be limited to an average of 2.5 miles per square
mile (ENF LRMP, Management Practice 27, page 4-84).
A closure plan will be instituted for motorized use,
during wet weather periods to reduce damage to native surface trails.
The plan will allow for trails to be open when soil conditions permit
(ENF LRMP, Management Practice 27, page 4-84).
Stabilize the surface of roads available for all weather
use (ENF LRMP, Management Practice 102, page 4-107). Confine use to the
dry seasons except on stabilized roads and trails (ENF LRMP, Management
Practice 27, page 4-288).
Roads and trails for which required rights-of-way do not
exist and those located predominantly on private land will not be
designated for OHV use * * * (ENF LRMP, Management Practice 27, page 4-
84).
Consistency With the Memorandum of Intent Between the USDA Forest
Service and the California Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation
Commission, and the Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division of
the California Department of Parks and Recreation
Designate OHV roads, trails, and specifically defined open
areas for motorized wheeled vehicles on maps of the 19 National Forests
in California.
Improve management of OHV use on National Forest System
lands in California by accomplishing the following: `` * * * (3)
designate trails, roads, and specifically defined open areas for OHV
use; (4) develop Forest Orders to protect natural resources and aid law
enforcement.* * * ''
Compliance With the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of California (Case CIV-S-02-0325 LKK/JFM, August 16, 2005,
Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton)
Issue a Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of
Decision on a new ENF OHV Plan to be consistent with regional
guidelines for OHV route designation, with new national OHV regulations
which the Forest Service expects will be promulgated later this year,
and with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act and
the National Forest Management Act.
Additional Purpose and Needs Identified from Public Input
Provide for a safe and sustainable variety of OHV access
and opportunities. Ensure a balance of 4X4, ATV, and motorcycle routes.
Provide motorized access to heavily used and traditional
dispersed sites and destinations.
Consider designating existing non-system routes that
create loops, thru-routes, and/or bypass sensitive areas.
Review and evaluate previous decisions of OHV road
closures and restrictions.
Review and evaluate the current assignment of maintenance
levels of system roads, and modify where appropriate.
Proposed Action
The Eldorado National Forest Supervisor proposes to designate
National Forest System maintenance level 1 roads (``closed to vehicular
traffic''), maintenance level 2 roads (``open for use by high clearance
vehicles''), and system motorized trails open to specific types of
public off-highway wheeled motor vehicle use and for season of use.
Eldorado National Forest maintenance level 3, 4, and 5 system roads
subject to the Federal Highway Safety Act are currently designated open
to highway legal vehicles. The Forest Supervisor will not propose to
redesignate these roads for off-highway wheeled motor vehicles;
however, portions of these roads may be designated for combined use of
highway legal and off-highway wheeled motor vehicles. The Forest
Supervisor will also consider non-system motor vehicle routes in the
current route inventory for designation as system roads or trails or
specific types of public off-highway wheeled motor vehicle use and for
season of use. Entire roads or road segments may be added to the road
system or assigned a dual designation as
[[Page 61780]]
a National Forest System trail. This proposal specifically considers:
Approximately 590 miles of maintenance level 1 roads to be
designated as system trails for ATVs and/or motorcycles.
Approximately 990 miles of maintenance level 2 roads to be
designated for 4x4s, ATVs, and/or motorcycles.
Approximately 130 miles of native surface maintenance
level 3 roads to be reassigned as maintenance level 2 roads for 4x4x,
ATVs, and/or motorcycles.
Approximately 3 miles of maintenance level 3, 4, 5 roads
to be designated for combined use of highway legal and off-highway
wheeled motor vehicles.
Approximately 136 miles of system motorized trails to be
designated for ATVs and/or motorcycles.
Approximately 11 miles of non-system routes in the current
route inventory to be designated as maintenance level 2 roads for 4x4s,
ATVs, and/or motorcycles.
Approximately 3 miles of non-system routes in the current
route inventory to be designated as system trails for ATVs and/or
motorcycles.
All routes designated for public off-highway wheeled motor vehicle
use will meet the standards and guidelines in the ENF LRMP as amended
by the SNFPA. All native surface routes designated for public off-
highway wheeled motor vehicle use will be closed from November 1 to May
1 each year. Inventoried routes not selected for designation for public
off-highway wheeled motor vehicle use will be closed to public wheeled
motor vehicles year round. The Rock Creek multi-use trail area on the
Eldorado National Forest is not affected by this decision and is
outside the scope of the project. Travel off of designated routes will
be prohibited. Such designations and restrictions will be implemented
by a issuing a forest order, pursuant to 36 CFR 261.
This proposal involves the designation of routes only and in no way
authorizes any ground disturbing activities, including: (1) The
construction of new routes; (2) the deconstruction or decommissioning
of inventoried routes; (3) the reconstruction of road or trails; (4)
the construction of trailheads, staging areas, or parking areas; (5)
the installation of gates or barriers; (6) restoration/rehabilitation
projects; or (7) wheeled motor vehicle use of dispersed camping sites.
The following uses are not affected by this decision and are
outside the scope of the project: (1) Highway legal (non-green sticker)
vehicle use of National Forest System roads subject to the Federal
Highway Safety Act, as well as state and county roads; (2) snowmobiles;
(3) aircraft; (4) watercraft; (5) non-motorized uses (e.g. hiking,
equestrian, mountain bikes); (6) search and rescue operations; (7)
firefighting operations and other emergency incident operations; (8)
law enforcement operations; (9) special events (event only trails);
(10) permitted uses (e.g. woodcutting, livestock herding/fence
maintenance); (11) administrative access; (12) government contractors
(e.g. timber, construction, and service contractors); and Homeland
Security and Defense Department operations; (13) access by wheelchairs
(motorized or non-motorized); (14) legal ingress and egress to private
land; (15) RS 2477 claims and processes; (16) the Rock Creek multi-use
trail area (under separate EIS and supplement); (17) the designation of
inventoried roadless areas or proposed wilderness additions; and (18)
changes to ENF LRMP land-use allocations.
Responsible Official
John D. Berry, Forest Supervisor, Eldorado National Forest, 100
Forni Road, Placerville, CA 95667.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The responsible official will decide whether to adopt and implement
the proposed action, an alternative to the proposed action, or take no
action to designate a portion of the inventoried routes on the Eldorado
National Forest open to public off-highway wheeled motor vehicle use,
and assign the type of use(s) and season of use allowed on each road
and trail or portion thereof. Inventoried routes not selected for
designation for public off-highway wheeled motor vehicle use will be
closed to all wheeled motor vehicles year round. The Rock Creek multi-
use trail area on the Eldorado National Forest is not affected by this
decision and is outside the scope of the project. Travel off of
designated routes will be prohibited. Such designations and
restrictions will be implemented by a issuing a forest order (pursuant
to 36 CFR 261).
Scoping Process
Public participation will be especially important at several points
during the analysis. The Forest Service will be seeking information,
comments, and assistance from the Federal, State, and local agencies
and other individuals or organizations who may be interested in or
affected by the proposed action.
The Notice of Intent is expected to be published in the Federal
Register on October 29, 2005. The comment period on the proposed action
will extend 30 days from the date the Notice of Intent is published in
the Federal Register.
The draft environmental impact statement is expected to be filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and to be available for
public review by June 2006. EPA will publish a notice of availability
of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. The comment period on the
draft EIS will extend 45 days from the date the EPA notice appears in
the Federal Register. At that time, copies of the draft EIS will be
distributed to interested and affected agencies, organizations, and
members of the public for their review and comment. It is very
important that those interested in the management of the Eldorado
National Forest participate at that time.
The final EIS is scheduled to be completed in October 2006. In the
final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to substantive
comments received during the comment period that pertain to the
environmental consequences discussed in the draft EIS and applicable
laws, regulations, and policies considered in making the decision
regarding route designation. Substantive comments are defined as
``comments within the scope of the proposed action, specific to the
proposed action, and have a direct relationship to the proposed action,
and include supporting reasons for the Responsible Official to
consider'' (36 CFR 215.2). Submission of substantive comments is a
prerequisite for eligibility to appeal under the 36 CFR part 215
regulations.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft supplemental environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft supplemental environmental impact statement stage but that are
not raised until after completion of the final supplemental
environmental impact statement may be waived or dismissed
[[Page 61781]]
by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338
(E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close
of the 45-day comment period so that substantive comments and
objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it
can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final
supplemental environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also
address the adequacy of the draft environmental impact statement or the
merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement.
Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposed
and will be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21.
Dated: October 20, 2005.
John D. Berry,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05-21340 Filed 10-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M