Private Land Mobile Services; 800 MHz Public Safety Interference Proceeding; NPSPAC Regions Assigned to Wave 2, 61823-61825 [05-21297]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices rural status need not re-certify for purposes of receiving support beginning January 1, 2001 and need only file thereafter if their status changes. Further, carriers serving more than 100,000 access lines need to file rural certifications for their year 2001 status and thereafter only if their status has changed. The Commission received an extension with no change to this information collection. OMB Control No.: 3060–0515. OMB Approval date: September 21, 2005. Expiration Date: September 30, 2008. Title: Section 43.21(c), Miscellaneous Common Carrier Annual Letter Filing Requirement. Form No.: N/A. Estimated Annual Burden: 38 responses; 38 total annual burden hours; 1 hour per respondent. Needs and Uses: Section 43.21(c) requires each miscellaneous common carrier with operating revenues in excess of the indexed threshold as defined in 47 CFR 32.9000 for a calendar year to file with the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau (formerly the Common Carrier Bureau) a letter showing its operating revenues for that year and the value of its total communications plant at the end of that year. The letter must be filed no later than April 1 of the following year. The information is used by FCC staff members to regulate and monitor the telephone industry and by the public to analyze the industry. The information on revenues and total plant is compiled and published in the Commission’s annual common carrier statistical publication and trends in telephone service report. The Commission received an extension with no change to this information collection. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. 05–21405 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [DA 05–2731] Announcement of Next Meeting Date and Agenda of Consumer Advisory Committee Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice; announcement of meeting. AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Oct 25, 2005 Jkt 208001 SUMMARY: This document announces the next meeting date and agenda of the Consumer Advisory Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to make recommendations to the Federal Communications Commission (‘‘Commission’’) regarding consumer issues within the jurisdiction of the Commission and to facilitate the participation of all consumers in proceedings before the Commission. DATES: The next meeting of the Committee will take place on Friday, November 18, 2005, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Marshall, (202) 418–2809 (voice), (202) 418–0179 (TTY) or e-mail: scott.marshall@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission’s Public Notice DA 0–2731 released October 18, 2005. The Commission announced the next meeting date and meeting agenda of its Consumer Advisory Committee. Purpose and Functions The purpose of the Committee is to make recommendations to the Commission regarding consumer issues within the jurisdiction of the Commission and to facilitate the participation of all consumers in proceedings before the Commission. Meeting Agenda At its November 18, 2004 meeting, the Committee will (1) receive briefings by FCC staff regarding Agency activities; (2) receive a report and recommendations from its TRS Working Group regarding access to VRS networks; and (3) receive a report and recommendations from its Media working group regarding public interest obligations related to digital television. The full Committee may take action on any or all of these agenda items. A copy of the October 18, 2005, Public Notice is available in alternate formats (Braille, cassette tape, large print or diskette) upon request. It is also posted on the Commission’s Web site at www.fcc.gov/cgb/cac. Meeting minutes will be available for public inspection at the FCC headquarters building. The Committee meeting will be open to the public and interested persons may attend the meeting and communicate their views. Members of the public will have an opportunity to address the Committee on issues of interest to them and the Committee. Written comments for the Committee may also be sent to the Committee’s PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 61823 Designated Federal Officer, Scott Marshall. The meeting site is fully accessible to people using wheelchairs or other mobility aids. Meeting agendas and handouts will be provided in accessible format; sign language interpreters, open captioning, and assistive listening devices will be provided on site. The meeting will be webcast with open captioning at https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ cac. Request other reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities as early as possible; please allow at least 14 days advance notice. Include a description of the accommodation you will need including as much detail as you can. Also include a way we can contact you if we need more information. Send an e-mail to: fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 (TTY). Federal Communications Commission. Monica Desai, Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau. [FR Doc. 05–21403 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [WT Docket No. 02–55; DA 05–2390] Private Land Mobile Services; 800 MHz Public Safety Interference Proceeding; NPSPAC Regions Assigned to Wave 2 Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: As part of the 800 MHz band reconfiguration process, the Commission stated that it would issue a public notice thirty days before reconfiguration is scheduled to start in each National Public Safety Planning Advisory Committee (NPSPAC) region. Each such public notice will specify a three-month voluntary negotiation period during which time identified licensees in the regions being reconfigured are encouraged to reach agreement with Nextel on the details of relocating. The voluntary negotiation period would be followed by a threemonth mandatory negotiation period, if necessary. The Commission also stated that it would freeze the filing of certain 800 MHz applications for the regions being reconfigured when it issued a public notice announcing the date when voluntary negotiation of relocation agreements must be concluded. The Commission explained that this freeze is E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1 61824 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices necessary in order to maintain a stable spectral landscape during the reconfiguration process in each region. DATES: This Notice announces that 800 MHz band reconfiguration for NPSPAC Regions in Wave 2 commenced on October 3, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberto Mussenden, Roberto.Mussenden@FCC.gov, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418–0680, TTY (202) 418– 7233. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of a public notice released on September 2, 2005. 1. In July 2004, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) adopted a Report and Order in this docket which, inter alia, reconfigured the 800 MHz band to eliminate interference to public safety and other land mobile communication systems operating in the band. See 69 FR 67823, November 22, 2004, modified by 70 FR 6758, February 8, 2005. As specified in the Report and Order, the band reconfiguration process is being overseen by a Transition Administrator (TA) which has provided the Commission with a plan detailing when band reconfiguration will commence in each of the fifty-five 800 MHz National Public Safety Planning Advisory Committee (NPSPAC) regions. On March 11, 2005, the Bureau approved the TA’s basic 800 MHz band reconfiguration schedule, i.e., the grouping of the NPSPAC regions into four waves (Waves 1–4) and starting the reconfiguration process in each wave on the dates recommended by the TA. See 70 FR 21786, April 27, 2005. 2. As part of the 800 MHz band reconfiguration process, the Commission stated that it would issue a Public Notice thirty days before reconfiguration is scheduled to start in each NPSPAC region. Each such Public Notice specifies a three-month voluntary negotiation period during which time identified licensees in the regions being reconfigured are encouraged to reach agreement with Nextel on the details of relocating. The voluntary negotiation period is followed by a three-month mandatory negotiation period, if necessary. The Commission also stated that it would freeze the filing of certain 800 MHz applications for the regions being reconfigured when it issued a Public Notice announcing the date when voluntary negotiation of relocation agreements must be concluded. The Commission explained that this freeze is necessary in order to maintain a stable spectral landscape VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Oct 25, 2005 Jkt 208001 during the reconfiguration process in each region. The Commission delegated authority to issue these Public Notices to the Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB). 3. On May 27, 2005, WTB released a Public Notice announcing the reconfiguration start date for the NPSPAC regions assigned to Wave 1 (i.e., for the non-NPSPAC channels therein). See 70 FR 34764–02, June 15, 2005. This Wave 1 PN also specified the 800 MHz reconfiguration benchmark compliance dates. By this Public Notice, we announce that the 800 MHz band reconfiguration process for nonNPSPAC channels will start October 3, 2005, in the NPSPAC regions assigned to Wave 2. A list of NPSPAC regions assigned to Wave 2 is attached below. The three-month period during which non-NPSPAC 800 MHz licensees have the option of negotiating on a voluntary basis will end January 2, 2006. The three-month mandatory negotiation period will end April 2, 2006. 4. We also announce by this Public Notice that, effective immediately, we are freezing the filing of 800 MHz applications for non-NPSPAC channels in Wave 2. The freeze applies to stations located in all of the NPSPAC regions assigned to Wave 2 and to stations within seventy miles of the borders of the Wave 2 regions. This freeze is effective on the release date of this Public Notice and will last until thirty working days after the date for completion of mandatory negotiations as specified above, i.e., until May 12, 2006. The freeze does not apply to modification applications filed to implement 800 MHz band reconfiguration, modification applications filed that do not change an 800 MHz frequency or expand a 800 MHz station’s existing coverage area (e.g., administrative updates), assignments/transfers, or renewal-only applications. 5. To facilitate the 800 MHz reconfiguration process, the Commission has established the following new radio service codes for licenses that list 800 MHz band frequencies governed by part 90 of the Commission’s Rules: Site specific licenses: • Public safety (conventional)—GE • Public safety (trunked)—YE • Business/Industrial/Land Transportation (conventional)—GJ • Business/Industrial/Land Transportation (trunked)—YJ • SMR (conventional)—GM and GL (The GL code is used only for applications listing both 800 MHz and 900 MHz frequencies) PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 • SMR (trunked)—YM and YL (The YL code is used only for applications listing both 800 MHz and 900 MHz frequencies) Geographic area licenses: • SMR, market area—YH and CY (The CY code is used only for applications listing both 800 MHz and 1.9 GHz frequencies) APPENDIX.—NPSPAC REGIONS ASSIGNED TO WAVE 2 NPSPAC region 1 4 12 15 16 17 22 24 25 26 32 34 38 39 40 44 46 47 48 49 51 52 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... * ............ Description of region 2 Arkansas. Idaho. Iowa. Kansas. Kentucky. Minnesota. Missouri. Montana. Nebraska. North Dakota. Oklahoma. South Dakota. Tennessee. Texas (Central & Northeast). West Virginia. Wyoming. Puerto Rico. U.S. Virgin Islands. Texas (Central—Austin area). Texas (East—Houston area). Texas (Panhandle, High Plains & Northwest-Lubbock area). Large non-public safety systems that cover multiple NPSPAC regions. 3 1 Per the TA’s request, we are moving the Louisiana NPSPAC region (#18) from Wave 2 to Wave 3. See letter from Bob Kelly to Michael Wilhelm, Chief Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, dated September 2, 2005. 2 Regions that are only a portion of a state or states are defined by counties. A list of the counties in each of these regions can be accessed at https://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.txt. 3 Large non-public safety systems that had no systems in Wave 1 and that provide coverage beyond the border of NPSPAC regions in Wave 2 will commence reconfiguration of their entire system, including base stations located outside the boundaries of Wave 2 NPSPAC regions, as part of the Wave 2 reconfiguration process. 6. The Commission’s Universal Licensing System (ULS) will automatically update modification applications filed to implement 800 MHz band reconfiguration to show the appropriate new radio service code (i.e., applicants should file using their current radio service codes). Once the radio service code has been changed on the license by the Commission, licensees filing subsequent applications concerning that license must use the new radio service code. E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2005 / Notices 7. The Reconfiguration Plan filed by the TA is available on the Commission’s 800 MHz band reconfiguration Web page at https://www.800MHz.gov. Questions concerning the plan, and other Transition Administrator matters, including whether your 800 MHz system must be relocated, should be directed to Brett Haan, BearingPoint, 1676 International Drive, McLean, VA 22102, Brett.Haan@800ta.org. For additional information on 800 MHz band reconfiguration issues, generally, please contact Roberto Mussenden, Esq., Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418–0680, TTY (202) 418–7233, or via e-mail to Roberto.Mussenden@fcc.gov. Federal Communications Commission. Scot Stone, Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. [FR Doc. 05–21297 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [Report No. 2730] Petitions For Reconsideration Of Action In Rulemaking Proceeding October 13, 2005. Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission’s Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of these documents is available for viewing and copying in Room CY–B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission’s copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1–800–378–3160). Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by November 10, 2005. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission’s rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired. Subject: In the Matter of Auction of Direct Broadcast Satellite Licenses (WT Docket No. 05–251). Number Of Petitions Filed: 1. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. 05–21207 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION [Report No. 2729] The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are available through the Commission’s Office of Agreements (202–523–5793 or tradeanalysis@fmc.gov). Agreement No.: 009857–009. Title: Florida-Caribbean Cruise Association (‘‘FCCA’’). Parties: Carnival Cruise Lines; Celebrity Cruises; Costa Cruise Lines; Cunard Line; Disney Cruise Line; Holland America Line; Norwegian Cruise Line; Princess Cruises; Radisson Seven Seas Cruises; Royal Caribbean International; Topaz International Cruises; Windstar Cruises; and MSC Cruises (USA) Inc. Filing Party: Matthew Thomas, Esq.; Troutman Sanders LLP; 401 9th Street NW; Suite 1000; Washington, DC 20004–2134. Synopsis: The subject modification would revise the agreement authority to more clearly describe the FCCA’s activities, delete authority for the members to take joint action on rates and charges, update the membership list and contact information, and republish the agreement. Agreement No.: 011843–001. Title: LT/ZIM Cross Space Charter and Sailing Agreement. Parties: Lloyd Triestino di Navigazione S.p.A. and Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd. Filing Party: Paul M. Keane, Esq.; Cichanowicz, Callan, Keane, Vengrow & Textor, LLP; 61 Broadway; Suite 3000; New York, NY 10006–2802. Synopsis: The modification updates Zim’s corporate name. Agreement No.: 011922. Title: TNWA/GA Cooperative Working Agreement. Parties: APL Co. Pte. Ltd./American President Lines, Ltd.; Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; Hapag-Lloyd Container Linie GmbH; Nippon Yusen Kaisha; and Orient Overseas Container Line Limited/Orient Overseas Container Line Inc./Orient Overseas Container Line (Europe) Limited. Filing Party: David F. Smith, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street NW; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036. Synopsis: The proposed agreement would authorize the parties to share Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding October 13, 2005. Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission’s Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of these documents is available for viewing and copying in Room CY–B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission’s copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1–800–378–3160). Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by November 10, 2005. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission’s rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired. Subject: In the Matter of the 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review Streamlining and Other Revisions of Part 25 of the Commission’s Rule Governing the Licensing of, and Spectrum Usage by, Satellite Network Earth Stations and Space Stations (IB Docket No. 00–248). In the Matter of Amendment of Part 25 of the Commission’s Rules and Regulations to Reduce Alien Carrier Interference Between Fixed-Satellite at Reduced Orbital Spacings and to Revise Application Procedures for Satellite Communication Services (CC Docket No. 86–496). Number of Petitions Filed: 3. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. 05–21208 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Performance Review Board As required by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–454), Chairman Kevin J. Martin appointed the following executives to the Performance Review Board (PRB): Michelle Carey, Thomas Navin, and Monica Desai. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. 05–20999 Filed 10–25–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:03 Oct 25, 2005 Jkt 208001 61825 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Notice of Agreements Filed E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61823-61825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[WT Docket No. 02-55; DA 05-2390]


Private Land Mobile Services; 800 MHz Public Safety Interference 
Proceeding; NPSPAC Regions Assigned to Wave 2

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As part of the 800 MHz band reconfiguration process, the 
Commission stated that it would issue a public notice thirty days 
before reconfiguration is scheduled to start in each National Public 
Safety Planning Advisory Committee (NPSPAC) region. Each such public 
notice will specify a three-month voluntary negotiation period during 
which time identified licensees in the regions being reconfigured are 
encouraged to reach agreement with Nextel on the details of relocating. 
The voluntary negotiation period would be followed by a three-month 
mandatory negotiation period, if necessary. The Commission also stated 
that it would freeze the filing of certain 800 MHz applications for the 
regions being reconfigured when it issued a public notice announcing 
the date when voluntary negotiation of relocation agreements must be 
concluded. The Commission explained that this freeze is

[[Page 61824]]

necessary in order to maintain a stable spectral landscape during the 
reconfiguration process in each region.

DATES: This Notice announces that 800 MHz band reconfiguration for 
NPSPAC Regions in Wave 2 commenced on October 3, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberto Mussenden, 
Roberto.Mussenden@FCC.gov, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure 
Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418-0680, TTY (202) 
418-7233.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of a public notice 
released on September 2, 2005.
    1. In July 2004, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) 
adopted a Report and Order in this docket which, inter alia, 
reconfigured the 800 MHz band to eliminate interference to public 
safety and other land mobile communication systems operating in the 
band. See 69 FR 67823, November 22, 2004, modified by 70 FR 6758, 
February 8, 2005. As specified in the Report and Order, the band 
reconfiguration process is being overseen by a Transition Administrator 
(TA) which has provided the Commission with a plan detailing when band 
reconfiguration will commence in each of the fifty-five 800 MHz 
National Public Safety Planning Advisory Committee (NPSPAC) regions. On 
March 11, 2005, the Bureau approved the TA's basic 800 MHz band 
reconfiguration schedule, i.e., the grouping of the NPSPAC regions into 
four waves (Waves 1-4) and starting the reconfiguration process in each 
wave on the dates recommended by the TA. See 70 FR 21786, April 27, 
2005.
    2. As part of the 800 MHz band reconfiguration process, the 
Commission stated that it would issue a Public Notice thirty days 
before reconfiguration is scheduled to start in each NPSPAC region. 
Each such Public Notice specifies a three-month voluntary negotiation 
period during which time identified licensees in the regions being 
reconfigured are encouraged to reach agreement with Nextel on the 
details of relocating. The voluntary negotiation period is followed by 
a three-month mandatory negotiation period, if necessary. The 
Commission also stated that it would freeze the filing of certain 800 
MHz applications for the regions being reconfigured when it issued a 
Public Notice announcing the date when voluntary negotiation of 
relocation agreements must be concluded. The Commission explained that 
this freeze is necessary in order to maintain a stable spectral 
landscape during the reconfiguration process in each region. The 
Commission delegated authority to issue these Public Notices to the 
Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division of the Wireless 
Telecommunications Bureau (WTB).
    3. On May 27, 2005, WTB released a Public Notice announcing the 
reconfiguration start date for the NPSPAC regions assigned to Wave 1 
(i.e., for the non-NPSPAC channels therein). See 70 FR 34764-02, June 
15, 2005. This Wave 1 PN also specified the 800 MHz reconfiguration 
benchmark compliance dates. By this Public Notice, we announce that the 
800 MHz band reconfiguration process for non-NPSPAC channels will start 
October 3, 2005, in the NPSPAC regions assigned to Wave 2. A list of 
NPSPAC regions assigned to Wave 2 is attached below. The three-month 
period during which non-NPSPAC 800 MHz licensees have the option of 
negotiating on a voluntary basis will end January 2, 2006. The three-
month mandatory negotiation period will end April 2, 2006.
    4. We also announce by this Public Notice that, effective 
immediately, we are freezing the filing of 800 MHz applications for 
non-NPSPAC channels in Wave 2. The freeze applies to stations located 
in all of the NPSPAC regions assigned to Wave 2 and to stations within 
seventy miles of the borders of the Wave 2 regions. This freeze is 
effective on the release date of this Public Notice and will last until 
thirty working days after the date for completion of mandatory 
negotiations as specified above, i.e., until May 12, 2006. The freeze 
does not apply to modification applications filed to implement 800 MHz 
band reconfiguration, modification applications filed that do not 
change an 800 MHz frequency or expand a 800 MHz station's existing 
coverage area (e.g., administrative updates), assignments/transfers, or 
renewal-only applications.
    5. To facilitate the 800 MHz reconfiguration process, the 
Commission has established the following new radio service codes for 
licenses that list 800 MHz band frequencies governed by part 90 of the 
Commission's Rules:
    Site specific licenses:
     Public safety (conventional)--GE
     Public safety (trunked)--YE
     Business/Industrial/Land Transportation (conventional)--GJ
     Business/Industrial/Land Transportation (trunked)--YJ
     SMR (conventional)--GM and GL (The GL code is used only 
for applications listing both 800 MHz and 900 MHz frequencies)
     SMR (trunked)--YM and YL (The YL code is used only for 
applications listing both 800 MHz and 900 MHz frequencies)
    Geographic area licenses:
     SMR, market area--YH and CY (The CY code is used only for 
applications listing both 800 MHz and 1.9 GHz frequencies)

              Appendix.--NPSPAC Regions Assigned to Wave 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        NPSPAC region \1\                Description of region \2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 4...............................  Arkansas.
12...............................  Idaho.
15...............................  Iowa.
16...............................  Kansas.
17...............................  Kentucky.
22...............................  Minnesota.
24...............................  Missouri.
25...............................  Montana.
26...............................  Nebraska.
32...............................  North Dakota.
34...............................  Oklahoma.
38...............................  South Dakota.
39...............................  Tennessee.
40...............................  Texas (Central & Northeast).
44...............................  West Virginia.
46...............................  Wyoming.
47...............................  Puerto Rico.
48...............................  U.S. Virgin Islands.
49...............................  Texas (Central--Austin area).
51...............................  Texas (East--Houston area).
52...............................  Texas (Panhandle, High Plains &
                                    Northwest-Lubbock area).
*................................  Large non-public safety systems that
                                    cover multiple NPSPAC regions. \3\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Per the TA's request, we are moving the Louisiana NPSPAC region
  (18) from Wave 2 to Wave 3. See letter from Bob Kelly to
  Michael Wilhelm, Chief Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure
  Division, dated September 2, 2005.
\2\ Regions that are only a portion of a state or states are defined by
  counties. A list of the counties in each of these regions can be
  accessed at https://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/
fcc98191.txt.
\3\ Large non-public safety systems that had no systems in Wave 1 and
  that provide coverage beyond the border of NPSPAC regions in Wave 2
  will commence reconfiguration of their entire system, including base
  stations located outside the boundaries of Wave 2 NPSPAC regions, as
  part of the Wave 2 reconfiguration process.

    6. The Commission's Universal Licensing System (ULS) will 
automatically update modification applications filed to implement 800 
MHz band reconfiguration to show the appropriate new radio service code 
(i.e., applicants should file using their current radio service codes). 
Once the radio service code has been changed on the license by the 
Commission, licensees filing subsequent applications concerning that 
license must use the new radio service code.

[[Page 61825]]

    7. The Reconfiguration Plan filed by the TA is available on the 
Commission's 800 MHz band reconfiguration Web page at https://
www.800MHz.gov. Questions concerning the plan, and other Transition 
Administrator matters, including whether your 800 MHz system must be 
relocated, should be directed to Brett Haan, BearingPoint, 1676 
International Drive, McLean, VA 22102, Brett.Haan@800ta.org. For 
additional information on 800 MHz band reconfiguration issues, 
generally, please contact Roberto Mussenden, Esq., Public Safety and 
Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 
at (202) 418-0680, TTY (202) 418-7233, or via e-mail to 
Roberto.Mussenden@fcc.gov.

Federal Communications Commission.
Scot Stone,
Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, 
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05-21297 Filed 10-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.