Miscellaneous Revisions to EPAAR Clauses, 61567-61571 [05-21196]
Download as PDF
61567
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
COLORADO—PM–10
Designation
date
Designated area
*
*
*
Prowers County Lamar .........................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
48 CFR Parts 1504, 1509, 1529, 1536,
1537, and 1552
[FRL–7986–2]
Miscellaneous Revisions to EPAAR
Clauses
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action on administrative changes to the
EPA Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR).
This action revises the EPAAR, but does
not impose any new requirements on
Agency contractors. The revisions in
this direct final rule will make minor
corrections to and streamline Agency
acquisition processes to be consistent
with and non-duplicative of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Some
EPAAR clauses will be revised and
others will be removed. FAR clauses are
available to provide coverage for the
EPAAR clauses that are removed by this
rule.
DATES: This rule is effective on
December 27, 2005 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by November 25, 2005. If we
receive such comment, we will publish
a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that this
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. OARM–
2005–0004, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
www.epa.gov/edocket. EDOCKET, EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: oei.docket@epa.gov.
15:21 Oct 24, 2005
*
*
*
...............................................................................
*
[FR Doc. 05–21262 Filed 10–24–05; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12/27/05
Jkt 208001
*
*
• Surface Mail: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Attention Docket ID # No. OARM–2005–
0004.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. OARM–2005–0004. EPA’s
policy is that all comments received
will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made
available online at https://www.epa.gov/
edocket, including any personal
information provided, unless the
comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do
not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through EDOCKET,
regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA
EDOCKET and the federal
regulations.gov Web sites are
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit
EDOCKET online or see the Federal
Register of May 31, 2002 (67 FR 38102).
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the EDOCKET index at
https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Classification date
Type
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Type
*
Attainment
*
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the OEI Docket, EPA/DC, EPA
West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566–
1752.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tiffany Schermerhorn, Policy, Training
and Oversight Division, Office of
Acquisition Management, Mail Code
3802R, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; e-mail address:
schermerhorn.tiffany@epa.gov,
telephone (202) 564–9902.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
This rule revises the Environmental
Protection Agency Acquisition
Regulation (EPAAR) to make
administrative changes. EPA is
publishing this rule without prior
proposal because we view this as a
noncontroversial amendment and
anticipate no adverse comment. This
rule does not impose any new
requirements on Agency contractors. All
changes are minor and are consistent
with the FAR.
II. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this rule
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under the terms of Executive Order
12866 and is therefore not subject to
OMB review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. This rule
does not impose any new information
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
61568
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
collection or other requirements on
Agency contractors.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts
of today’s rule on small entities, small
entity is defined as: (1) A small business
as defined by the Small Business
Administration’s (SBA) regulations at 13
CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic
impacts of today’s direct final rule on
small entities, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This direct final rule will not
impose any requirements on small
entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
EPA generally must prepare a written
statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules
with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures to State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or to the private sector, of $100 million
or more in any one year. Before
promulgating an EPA rule for which a
written statement is needed, section 205
of the UMRA generally requires EPA to
identify and consider a reasonable
number of regulatory alternatives and
adopt the least costly, most costeffective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule.
The provisions of section 205 do not
apply when they are inconsistent with
applicable law. Moreover, section 205
allows EPA to adopt an alternative other
than the least costly, most cost-effective
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Oct 24, 2005
Jkt 208001
or least burdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final
rule an explanation why that alternative
was not adopted. Before EPA establishes
any regulatory requirements that may
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including tribal
governments, it must have developed
under section 203 of the UMRA a small
government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially
affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments
to have meaningful and timely input in
the development of EPA regulatory
proposals with significant Federal
intergovernmental mandates, and
informing, educating, and advising
small governments on compliance with
the regulatory requirements.
Today’s rule contains no Federal
mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for
State, local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. The rule imposes no
enforceable duty on any State, local or
tribal governments or the private sector.
Thus, today’s rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
the UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), requires EPA to develop an
accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’
This direct final rule does not have
federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. Thus, Executive
Order 13132 does not apply to this rule.
F. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments)
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ This direct final rule
does not have tribal implications, as
specified in Executive Order 13175. It
will not have substantial direct effects
on tribal governments, or on the
relationship between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175. The
direct final rule amends acquisition
regulations that are administrative in
nature. Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
Executive Order 13045: ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) applies to any rule that:
(1) Is determined to be ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
EPA has reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If
the regulatory action meets both criteria,
the Agency must evaluate the
environmental health or safety effects of
the planned rule on children, and
explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective
and reasonably feasible alternatives
considered by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 because it is not an
economically significant rule as defined
by Executive Order 12866, and because
it does not involve decisions on
environmental health or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211 (Energy
Effects)
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)) because it is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. The NTTAA directs
EPA to provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
not to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards.
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards. Therefore, EPA is
not considering the use of any voluntary
consensus standards. EPA welcomes
comments on this aspect of the
proposed rulemaking and, specifically,
invites the public to identify
potentially-applicable voluntary
consensus standards and to explain why
such standards should be used in this
regulation.
J. Submission to Congress and the
General Accounting Office
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will be effective 60 days from date of
publication.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1504,
1509, 1529, 1535, 1536, 1537, and 1552
Government procurement.
Dated: October 6, 2005.
John C. Gherardini,
Acting Director, Office of Acquisition
Management.
For the reasons set forth in the
Preamble, Chapter 15 of Title 48 Code
of Federal Regulations, parts 1504, 1509,
1529, 1536, 1537, and 1552 are
amended as follows:
I 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 1504, 1509, 1529, 1536, 1537, and
1552 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390 as
amended, 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
PART 1504—ADMINISTRATIVE
MATTERS
1504.670
[Removed and reserved]
2. Remove and reserve section
1504.670.
I
PART 1509—CONTRACTOR
QUALIFICATIONS
3. Revise section 1509.507–2(c) to
read as follows:
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Oct 24, 2005
Jkt 208001
1509.507–2
Contract clause.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The Contracting Officer shall
include the clause at 1552.209–74 or its
alternates in the following solicitations
and contracts for Superfund work in
excess of the simplified acquisition
threshold and, as appropriate, in
simplified acquisition procedures for
Superfund work. The Contracting
Officer shall include the clause at
1552.209–74 in all Response Action
Contract (RAC) solicitations and
contracts, except Site Specific
solicitations and contracts. The term
‘‘RAC’’ in the Limitation of Future
Contracting clauses includes not only
RAC solicitations and contracts but
other long term response action
solicitations and contracts that provide
professional architect/engineer,
technical, and management services to
EPA to support remedial response,
enforcement oversight and non-time
critical removal activities under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability
Act of 1980, as amended by the
Superfund Amendments
Reauthorization Act of 1986; and the
Robert T. Stafford Natural Disaster Act
pursuant to the Federal Response Plan
and other laws to help address and/or
mitigate endangerment to the public
health, welfare or environment during
emergencies and natural disasters, and
to support States and communities in
preparing for the responses to releases
of hazardous substances.
(1) Alternate I shall be used in all
Emergency and Rapid Response
Services (ERRS) solicitations and
contracts, except site specific
solicitations and contracts. The term
‘‘ERRS’’ in the Limitation of Future
Contracting clauses includes not only
ERRS solicitations and contracts but
other emergency response type
solicitations and contracts that provide
fast responsive environmental cleanup
services for hazardous substances/
wastes/contaminants/material and
petroleum products/oil. Environmental
cleanup response to natural disasters
and terrorist activities may also be
required. ERRS pilot scale studies are
included in the term ‘‘treatability
studies.’’
(2) Alternate II shall be used in all
Superfund Technical Assistance and
Removal Team (START) solicitations
and contracts. The term ‘‘START’’ in the
Limitation of Future Contracting clauses
include not only START solicitations
and contracts but other site removal and
technical support solicitations and
contracts that include activities related
to technical analyses in determining the
nature and extent of contamination at a
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61569
site and making recommendations
regarding response technologies.
(3) Alternate III shall be used in all
Environmental Services Assistance
Team (ESAT) solicitations and
contracts.
(4) Alternate IV shall be used in all
Enforcement Support Services (ESS)
solicitations and contracts. The term
‘‘ESS’’ in the Limitation of Future
Contracting clauses not only includes
ESS solicitation and contracts but other
enforcement support type solicitations
and contracts that involve removal
actions, mandatory notices to
Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs),
penalty assessments, public comment
periods, negotiations with PRPs, and
statutes of limitations for pursuing cost
recovery. The enforcement support
services required under the contract
may be conducted to support EPA
enforcement actions under any
environmental statute.
(5) Alternate V shall be used in all
Superfund Headquarters Support
solicitations and contracts. The
Contracting Officer is authorized to
modify paragraph (c) of Alternate V to
reflect any unique limitations applicable
to the program requirements.
(6) Alternate VI shall be used in all
Site Specific solicitations and contracts.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 1529—TAXES
1529.401–70
I
[Removed]
4. Remove section 1529.401–70.
PART 1536—CONSTRUCTION AND
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS
5. Revise section 1536.602–2(a) to
read as follows:
I
1536.602–2
boards.
Establishment of evaluation
(a) The Environmental Protection
Agency Architect-Engineer Evaluation
Board is established as a central
permanent Board located at
Headquarters EPA under authority
delegated to the Director, Office of
Acquisition Management, which may be
re-delegated.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 1537—SERVICE CONTRACTING
1537.110
[Amended]
6. Remove section 1537.110(d) and
redesignate paragraphs (e) through (g) as
paragraphs (d) through (f).
I
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
61570
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
PART 1552—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
1552.204–70
[Removed and reserved]
7. Remove and reserve section
1552.204–70.
I 8. Section 1552.208–70 is amended by
adding an ‘‘Incidental’’ definition after
the definition of ‘‘Requirement’’ in
paragraph (a), and revising the heading
of the clause and paragraphs (b) and
(d)(2) through (d)(4) to read as follows:
I
1552.208–70
*
*
*
Printing.
*
*
Printing (Dec 2005)
(a) * * *
‘‘Incidental’’ means a draft and/or proofed
document (not a final document) that is not
prohibited from printing under EPA
contracts.
(b) Prohibition. (1) The contractor shall not
engage in, nor subcontract for, any printing
in connection with the performance of work
under this contract. Duplication of more than
5,000 copies of one page or more than 25,000
copies of multiple pages in the aggregate per
requirement constitutes printing. The intent
of the printing limitation is to eliminate
duplication of final documents.
(2) In compliance with EPA Order 2200.4a,
EPA Publication Review Procedure, the
Office of Communications, Education, and
Media Relations is responsible for the review
of materials generated under a contract
published or issued by the Agency under a
contract intended for release to the public.
(c) * * *
(d) * * *
(2) The contractor may perform a
requirement involving the duplication of less
than 5,000 copies of only one page, or less
than 25,000 copies of multiple pages in the
aggregate, using one color (black), such pages
shall not exceed the maximum image size of
103⁄4 by 141⁄4 inches, or 11 by 17 paper stock.
Duplication services below these thresholds
are not considered printing. If performance of
the contract will require duplication in
excess of these thresholds, contractors must
immediately notify the contracting officer in
writing. The contracting officer must obtain
a waiver from the U.S. Congress Joint
Committee on Printing if it is deemed
appropriate to exceed the duplication
thresholds. Duplication services of
‘‘incidentals’’ in excess of the thresholds, are
allowable.
(3) The contractor may perform a
requirement involving the multi-color
duplication of no more than 100 pages in the
aggregate using color copier technology, such
pages shall not exceed the maximum image
size of 103⁄4 by 141⁄4 inches, or 11 by 17 paper
stock. Duplication services below these
thresholds are not considered printing. If
performance of the contract will require
duplication in excess of these limits,
contractors must immediately notify the
contracting officer in writing. The contracting
officer must obtain a waiver from the U.S.
Congress Joint Committee on Printing.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Oct 24, 2005
Jkt 208001
(4) The contractor may perform the
duplication of no more than a total of 100
diskettes or CD–ROM’s. Duplication services
below these thresholds are not considered
printing. If performance of the contract will
require duplication in excess of these
thresholds, contractors must immediately
notify the contracting officer in writing. The
contracting officer must obtain a waiver from
the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on
Printing.
*
*
*
*
*
9. In section 1552.209–74, revise the
clause heading; revise paragraphs (c)
through (i) and remove paragraph (j),
revise the heading and paragraph (d) of
Alternate I; revise the heading and
paragraph (d) of Alternate II; revise the
headings of Alternate III and Alternate
IV; revise the heading and paragraph (c)
of Alternate V; and revise the heading
and paragraphs (d) introductory text and
(d)(1) of Alternate VI to read as follows:
I
1552.209–74
contracting.
*
*
*
Limitation of future
*
*
Limitation of Future Contracting (RAC) (Apr
2004)
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The following applies when work is
performed under this contract: Unless prior
written approval is obtained from the
cognizant EPA Contracting Officer, the
Contractor, during the life of the work
assignment, task order, or tasking document
and for a period of five (5) years after the
completion of the work assignment, task
order, or tasking document, agrees not to
enter into a contract with or to represent any
party, other than EPA, with respect to: (1)
Any work relating to CERCLA activities
which pertain to a site where the Contractor
previously performed work for EPA under
this contract; or (2) any work that may
jeopardize CERCLA enforcement actions
which pertain to a site where the Contractor
previously performed work for the EPA
under this contract.
(d) The Contractor and any subcontractors,
during the life of this contract, shall be
ineligible to enter into an EPA contract or a
subcontract under an EPA contract, which
supports EPA’s performance of Superfund
Headquarters policy work including support
for the analysis and development of
regulations, policies, or guidance that govern,
affect, or relate to the conduct of response
action activities, unless otherwise authorized
by the Contracting Officer. Examples of such
contracts include, but are not limited to,
Superfund Management and Analytical
support contracts, and Superfund Technical
and Analytical support contracts.
(e) The Contractor agrees in advance that
if any bids/proposals are submitted for any
work that would require written approval of
the Contracting Officer prior to entering into
a contract subject to the restrictions of this
clause, then the bids/proposals are submitted
at the Contractor’s own risk. Therefore, no
claim shall be made against the Government
to recover bid/proposal costs as a direct cost
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
whether the request for authorization to enter
into the contract is denied or approved.
(f) To the extent that the work under this
contract requires access to proprietary or
confidential business or financial data of
other companies, and as long as such data
remains proprietary or confidential, the
Contractor shall protect such data from
unauthorized use and disclosure.
(g) The Contractor agrees to insert in each
subcontract or consultant agreement placed
hereunder, except for subcontracts or
consultant agreements for nondiscretionary
technical or engineering services, including
treatability studies, well drilling, fence
erecting, plumbing, utility hookups, security
guard services, or electrical services,
provisions which shall conform substantially
to the language of this clause, including this
paragraph (g) unless otherwise authorized by
the Contracting Officer. The Contractor may
request in writing that the Contracting Officer
exempt from this clause a particular
subcontract or consultant agreement for
nondiscretionary technical or engineering
services not specifically listed above,
including laboratory analysis. The
Contracting Officer will review and evaluate
each request on a case-by-case basis before
approving or disapproving the request.
(h) If the Contractor seeks an expedited
decision regarding its initial future
contracting request, the Contractor may
submit its request to both the Contracting
Officer and the next administrative level
within the Contracting Officer’s organization.
(i) A review process available to the
Contractor when an adverse determination is
received shall consist of a request for
reconsideration to the Contracting Officer or
a request for review submitted to the next
administrative level within the Contracting
Officer’s organization. An adverse
determination resulting from a request for
reconsideration by the Contracting Officer
will not preclude the contractor from
requesting a review by the next
administrative level. Either a request for
review or a request for reconsideration must
be submitted to the appropriate level within
30 calendar days after receipt of the initial
adverse determination.
(End of Clause)
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate I
(ERRS) (Apr 2004)
*
*
*
*
*
(d) During the life of this contract,
including any options, the Contractor agrees
that unless otherwise authorized by the
Contracting Officer:
(1) It will not provide any Superfund
Technical Assistance and Removal Team
(START); type activities (e.g., START
contracts) to EPA within the Contractor’s
ERRS assigned geographical area(s), either as
a prime contractor, subcontractor, or
consultant.
(2) It will not provide any START type
activities (e.g., START contracts) to EPA as
a prime contractor, subcontractor or
consultant at a site where it has performed
or plans to perform ERRS work.
(3) It will be ineligible for award of START
type activities contracts for sites within its
respective ERRS assigned geographical
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
area(s) which result from a CERCLA
administrative order, a CERCLA or RCRA
consent decree or a court order.
*
*
*
*
1552.229–70
*
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate II
(Start) (Apr 2004)
*
*
*
*
*
(d) During the life of this contract,
including any options, the Contractor agrees
that unless otherwise authorized by the
Contracting Officer:
(1) It will not provide to EPA cleanup
services (e.g., Emergency and Rapid
Response Services (ERRS) contracts) within
the Contractor’s START assigned
geographical area(s), either as a prime
Contractor, subcontractor, or consultant.
(2) Unless an individual design for the site
has been prepared by a third party, it will not
provide to EPA as a prime contractor,
subcontractor or consultant any remedial
construction services at a site where it has
performed or plans to perform START work.
This clause will not preclude START
contractors from performing construction
management services under other EPA
contracts.
(3) It will be ineligible for award of ERRS
type activities contracts for sites within its
respective START assigned geographical
area(s) which result from a CERCLA
administrative order, a CERCLA or RCRA
consent decree or a court order.
*
*
*
*
*
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate
III (ESAT) (Apr 2004)
*
*
*
*
*
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate
IV (TES) (Apr 2004)
*
*
*
*
*
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate V
(Headquarters Support) (Apr 2004)
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The Contractor, during the life of this
contract, will be ineligible to enter into a
contract with EPA to perform response action
work (e.g., Response Action Contract (RAC),
Emergency and Rapid Response Services
(ERRS), Superfund Technical Assistance and
Removal Team (START), and Enforcement
Support Services (ESS) contracts), unless
otherwise authorized by the Contracting
Officer.
*
*
*
*
*
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate
VI (Site Specific) (Apr 2004)
*
*
*
*
*
(d) During the life of this contract,
including any options, the Contractor agrees
that unless otherwise authorized by the
Contracting Officer:
(1) It will not provide any Superfund
Technical Assistance and Removal Team
(START) type activities (e.g., START
contracts) to EPA on the site either as a prime
contractor, subcontractor, or consultant.
*
*
*
1552.215–76
*
*
[Removed and reserved]
10. Remove and reserve section
1552.215–76.
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Oct 24, 2005
Jkt 208001
[Removed and reserved]
11. Remove and reserve section
1552.229–70.
I
1552.237–73
[Removed and reserved]
12. Remove and reserve section
1552.237–73.
I
[FR Doc. 05–21196 Filed 10–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 192 and 195
[Docket No. RSPA–04–16855; Amdt. 192–
101 and 195–85]
RIN 2137—AD97
Pipeline Safety: Standards for Direct
Assessment of Gas and Hazardous
Liquid Pipelines
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Under current regulations
governing integrity management of gas
transmission lines, if an operator uses
direct assessment to evaluate corrosion
risks, it must carry out the direct
assessment according to PHMSA
standards. In response to a statutory
directive, this Final Rule prescribes
similar standards operators must meet
when they use direct assessment on
certain other onshore gas, hazardous
liquid, and carbon dioxide pipelines.
PHMSA believes broader application of
direct assessment standards will
enhance public confidence in the use of
direct assessment to assure pipeline
safety.
This Final Rule takes effect
November 25, 2005. Incorporation by
reference of NACE Standard RP0502–
2002 in this rule is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of
November 25, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: L.M.
Furrow by phone at 202–366–4559, by
fax at 202–366–4566, by mail at U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590, or by e-mail at
buck.furrow@dot.gov.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This Final Rule concerns direct
assessment, a process of managing the
effects of external corrosion, internal
corrosion, or stress corrosion cracking
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61571
on pipelines made primarily of steel or
iron. The process involves data
collection, indirect inspection, direct
examination, and evaluation. Operators
use direct assessment not only to find
existing corrosion defects but also to
prevent future corrosion problems.
Congress recognized the advantages of
using direct assessment on U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT)
regulated gas, hazardous liquid, and
carbon dioxide pipeline facilities.
Section 14 of the Pipeline Safety
Improvement Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–
355; Dec. 17, 2002) directs DOT to issue
regulations on using internal inspection,
pressure testing, and direct assessment
to manage the risks to gas pipeline
facilities in high consequence areas. In
addition, Section 23 directs DOT to
issue regulations prescribing standards
for inspecting pipeline facilities by
direct assessment.
In response to the first statutory
directive, Section 14, DOT’s Research
and Special Programs Administration
(RSPA) 1 published regulations in 49
CFR part 192, subpart O, that require
operators to follow detailed programs to
manage the integrity of gas transmission
line segments in high consequence
areas. Subpart O also requires an
operator electing to use direct
assessment in its integrity management
program, to carry out the direct
assessment according to § § 192.925,
192.927, and 192.929, as appropriate.2
Sections 192.925, 192.927, and
192.929 cross-reference the American
Society of Mechanical Engineers’
(ASME), ASME B31.8S–2001,
‘‘Managing System Integrity of Gas
Pipelines.’’ ASME B31.8S–2001
describes a comprehensive process to
assess and mitigate the likelihood and
consequences of gas pipeline risks. In
addition, § 192.925 cross-references a
1 The Norman Y. Mineta Research and Special
Programs Improvement Act (Pub. L. 108–426, 118;
November 30, 2004) reorganized RSPA into two
new DOT administrations: the Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) and the Research and Innovative
Technology Administration. RSPA’s regulatory
authority over pipeline and hazardous materials
safety was transferred to PHMSA.
2 The standard on external corrosion direct
assessment § 192.925) requires operators to
integrate data on physical characteristics and
operating history, conduct indirect aboveground
inspections, directly examine pipe surfaces, and
evaluate the effectiveness of the assessment process.
Under the standard for direct assessment of internal
corrosion (§ 192.927), operators must predict
locations where electrolytes may accumulate in
normally dry-gas pipelines, examine those
locations, and validate the assessment process. The
standard for direct assessment of stress corrosion
cracking (§ 192.929) involves collecting data
relevant to stress corrosion cracking, assessing the
risk of pipeline segments, and examining and
evaluating segments at risk.
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 25, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61567-61571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21196]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
48 CFR Parts 1504, 1509, 1529, 1536, 1537, and 1552
[FRL-7986-2]
Miscellaneous Revisions to EPAAR Clauses
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on administrative changes to
the EPA Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR). This action revises the EPAAR,
but does not impose any new requirements on Agency contractors. The
revisions in this direct final rule will make minor corrections to and
streamline Agency acquisition processes to be consistent with and non-
duplicative of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Some EPAAR
clauses will be revised and others will be removed. FAR clauses are
available to provide coverage for the EPAAR clauses that are removed by
this rule.
DATES: This rule is effective on December 27, 2005 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by November 25, 2005. If we
receive such comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. OARM-2005-
0004, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://www.epa.gov/edocket. EDOCKET,
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's preferred
method for receiving comments. Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
E-mail: oei.docket@epa.gov.
Surface Mail: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection
Agency, Mailcode: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC
20460. Attention Docket ID No. OARM-2005-0004.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. OARM-2005-0004.
EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change and may be made available online at http:/
/www.epa.gov/edocket, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through EDOCKET, regulations.gov, or e-
mail. The EPA EDOCKET and the federal regulations.gov Web sites are
``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit EDOCKET online or see the Federal Register of May 31, 2002
(67 FR 38102).
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the EDOCKET index
at https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the OEI Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the
telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-1752.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tiffany Schermerhorn, Policy, Training
and Oversight Division, Office of Acquisition Management, Mail Code
3802R, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; e-mail address: schermerhorn.tiffany@epa.gov,
telephone (202) 564-9902.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
This rule revises the Environmental Protection Agency Acquisition
Regulation (EPAAR) to make administrative changes. EPA is publishing
this rule without prior proposal because we view this as a
noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comment. This rule
does not impose any new requirements on Agency contractors. All changes
are minor and are consistent with the FAR.
II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this rule is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is
therefore not subject to OMB review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
This rule does not impose any new information
[[Page 61568]]
collection or other requirements on Agency contractors.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as defined
by the Small Business Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR
121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of
a city, county, town, school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is
any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated
and is not dominant in its field.
After considering the economic impacts of today's direct final rule
on small entities, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This direct final rule will not impose any requirements on small
entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that
may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
one year. Before promulgating an EPA rule for which a written statement
is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires EPA to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt
the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205
do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover,
section 205 allows EPA to adopt an alternative other than the least
costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that
alternative was not adopted. Before EPA establishes any regulatory
requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including tribal governments, it must have developed under
section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments to have meaningful and timely
input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant
Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and
advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory
requirements.
Today's rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. The rule imposes no enforceable duty
on any State, local or tribal governments or the private sector. Thus,
today's rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205
of the UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
This direct final rule does not have federalism implications. It
will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. Thus, Executive
Order 13132 does not apply to this rule.
F. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments)
Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' This direct final rule does
not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. It
will not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, or on
the relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175. The direct final rule amends
acquisition regulations that are administrative in nature. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
Executive Order 13045: ``Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies
to any rule that: (1) Is determined to be ``economically significant''
as defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may
have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action
meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health
or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the
planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and
reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is not
an economically significant rule as defined by Executive Order 12866,
and because it does not involve decisions on environmental health or
safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)) because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C.
272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA
to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides
[[Page 61569]]
not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. Therefore,
EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus standards.
EPA welcomes comments on this aspect of the proposed rulemaking and,
specifically, invites the public to identify potentially-applicable
voluntary consensus standards and to explain why such standards should
be used in this regulation.
J. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2). This rule will be effective 60 days from date of publication.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1504, 1509, 1529, 1535, 1536,
1537, and 1552
Government procurement.
Dated: October 6, 2005.
John C. Gherardini,
Acting Director, Office of Acquisition Management.
0
For the reasons set forth in the Preamble, Chapter 15 of Title 48 Code
of Federal Regulations, parts 1504, 1509, 1529, 1536, 1537, and 1552
are amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 1504, 1509, 1529, 1536,
1537, and 1552 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390 as amended, 40 U.S.C.
486(c).
PART 1504--ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
1504.670 [Removed and reserved]
0
2. Remove and reserve section 1504.670.
PART 1509--CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS
0
3. Revise section 1509.507-2(c) to read as follows:
1509.507-2 Contract clause.
* * * * *
(c) The Contracting Officer shall include the clause at 1552.209-74
or its alternates in the following solicitations and contracts for
Superfund work in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold and,
as appropriate, in simplified acquisition procedures for Superfund
work. The Contracting Officer shall include the clause at 1552.209-74
in all Response Action Contract (RAC) solicitations and contracts,
except Site Specific solicitations and contracts. The term ``RAC'' in
the Limitation of Future Contracting clauses includes not only RAC
solicitations and contracts but other long term response action
solicitations and contracts that provide professional architect/
engineer, technical, and management services to EPA to support remedial
response, enforcement oversight and non-time critical removal
activities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation
and Liability Act of 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments
Reauthorization Act of 1986; and the Robert T. Stafford Natural
Disaster Act pursuant to the Federal Response Plan and other laws to
help address and/or mitigate endangerment to the public health, welfare
or environment during emergencies and natural disasters, and to support
States and communities in preparing for the responses to releases of
hazardous substances.
(1) Alternate I shall be used in all Emergency and Rapid Response
Services (ERRS) solicitations and contracts, except site specific
solicitations and contracts. The term ``ERRS'' in the Limitation of
Future Contracting clauses includes not only ERRS solicitations and
contracts but other emergency response type solicitations and contracts
that provide fast responsive environmental cleanup services for
hazardous substances/wastes/contaminants/material and petroleum
products/oil. Environmental cleanup response to natural disasters and
terrorist activities may also be required. ERRS pilot scale studies are
included in the term ``treatability studies.''
(2) Alternate II shall be used in all Superfund Technical
Assistance and Removal Team (START) solicitations and contracts. The
term ``START'' in the Limitation of Future Contracting clauses include
not only START solicitations and contracts but other site removal and
technical support solicitations and contracts that include activities
related to technical analyses in determining the nature and extent of
contamination at a site and making recommendations regarding response
technologies.
(3) Alternate III shall be used in all Environmental Services
Assistance Team (ESAT) solicitations and contracts.
(4) Alternate IV shall be used in all Enforcement Support Services
(ESS) solicitations and contracts. The term ``ESS'' in the Limitation
of Future Contracting clauses not only includes ESS solicitation and
contracts but other enforcement support type solicitations and
contracts that involve removal actions, mandatory notices to
Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs), penalty assessments, public
comment periods, negotiations with PRPs, and statutes of limitations
for pursuing cost recovery. The enforcement support services required
under the contract may be conducted to support EPA enforcement actions
under any environmental statute.
(5) Alternate V shall be used in all Superfund Headquarters Support
solicitations and contracts. The Contracting Officer is authorized to
modify paragraph (c) of Alternate V to reflect any unique limitations
applicable to the program requirements.
(6) Alternate VI shall be used in all Site Specific solicitations
and contracts.
* * * * *
PART 1529--TAXES
1529.401-70 [Removed]
0
4. Remove section 1529.401-70.
PART 1536--CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS
0
5. Revise section 1536.602-2(a) to read as follows:
1536.602-2 Establishment of evaluation boards.
(a) The Environmental Protection Agency Architect-Engineer
Evaluation Board is established as a central permanent Board located at
Headquarters EPA under authority delegated to the Director, Office of
Acquisition Management, which may be re-delegated.
* * * * *
PART 1537--SERVICE CONTRACTING
1537.110 [Amended]
0
6. Remove section 1537.110(d) and redesignate paragraphs (e) through
(g) as paragraphs (d) through (f).
[[Page 61570]]
PART 1552--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
1552.204-70 [Removed and reserved]
0
7. Remove and reserve section 1552.204-70.
0
8. Section 1552.208-70 is amended by adding an ``Incidental''
definition after the definition of ``Requirement'' in paragraph (a),
and revising the heading of the clause and paragraphs (b) and (d)(2)
through (d)(4) to read as follows:
1552.208-70 Printing.
* * * * *
Printing (Dec 2005)
(a) * * *
``Incidental'' means a draft and/or proofed document (not a
final document) that is not prohibited from printing under EPA
contracts.
(b) Prohibition. (1) The contractor shall not engage in, nor
subcontract for, any printing in connection with the performance of
work under this contract. Duplication of more than 5,000 copies of
one page or more than 25,000 copies of multiple pages in the
aggregate per requirement constitutes printing. The intent of the
printing limitation is to eliminate duplication of final documents.
(2) In compliance with EPA Order 2200.4a, EPA Publication Review
Procedure, the Office of Communications, Education, and Media
Relations is responsible for the review of materials generated under
a contract published or issued by the Agency under a contract
intended for release to the public.
(c) * * *
(d) * * *
(2) The contractor may perform a requirement involving the
duplication of less than 5,000 copies of only one page, or less than
25,000 copies of multiple pages in the aggregate, using one color
(black), such pages shall not exceed the maximum image size of 10\3/
4\ by 14\1/4\ inches, or 11 by 17 paper stock. Duplication services
below these thresholds are not considered printing. If performance
of the contract will require duplication in excess of these
thresholds, contractors must immediately notify the contracting
officer in writing. The contracting officer must obtain a waiver
from the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Printing if it is deemed
appropriate to exceed the duplication thresholds. Duplication
services of ``incidentals'' in excess of the thresholds, are
allowable.
(3) The contractor may perform a requirement involving the
multi-color duplication of no more than 100 pages in the aggregate
using color copier technology, such pages shall not exceed the
maximum image size of 10\3/4\ by 14\1/4\ inches, or 11 by 17 paper
stock. Duplication services below these thresholds are not
considered printing. If performance of the contract will require
duplication in excess of these limits, contractors must immediately
notify the contracting officer in writing. The contracting officer
must obtain a waiver from the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on
Printing.
(4) The contractor may perform the duplication of no more than a
total of 100 diskettes or CD-ROM's. Duplication services below these
thresholds are not considered printing. If performance of the
contract will require duplication in excess of these thresholds,
contractors must immediately notify the contracting officer in
writing. The contracting officer must obtain a waiver from the U.S.
Congress Joint Committee on Printing.
* * * * *
0
9. In section 1552.209-74, revise the clause heading; revise paragraphs
(c) through (i) and remove paragraph (j), revise the heading and
paragraph (d) of Alternate I; revise the heading and paragraph (d) of
Alternate II; revise the headings of Alternate III and Alternate IV;
revise the heading and paragraph (c) of Alternate V; and revise the
heading and paragraphs (d) introductory text and (d)(1) of Alternate VI
to read as follows:
1552.209-74 Limitation of future contracting.
* * * * *
Limitation of Future Contracting (RAC) (Apr 2004)
* * * * *
(c) The following applies when work is performed under this
contract: Unless prior written approval is obtained from the
cognizant EPA Contracting Officer, the Contractor, during the life
of the work assignment, task order, or tasking document and for a
period of five (5) years after the completion of the work
assignment, task order, or tasking document, agrees not to enter
into a contract with or to represent any party, other than EPA, with
respect to: (1) Any work relating to CERCLA activities which pertain
to a site where the Contractor previously performed work for EPA
under this contract; or (2) any work that may jeopardize CERCLA
enforcement actions which pertain to a site where the Contractor
previously performed work for the EPA under this contract.
(d) The Contractor and any subcontractors, during the life of
this contract, shall be ineligible to enter into an EPA contract or
a subcontract under an EPA contract, which supports EPA's
performance of Superfund Headquarters policy work including support
for the analysis and development of regulations, policies, or
guidance that govern, affect, or relate to the conduct of response
action activities, unless otherwise authorized by the Contracting
Officer. Examples of such contracts include, but are not limited to,
Superfund Management and Analytical support contracts, and Superfund
Technical and Analytical support contracts.
(e) The Contractor agrees in advance that if any bids/proposals
are submitted for any work that would require written approval of
the Contracting Officer prior to entering into a contract subject to
the restrictions of this clause, then the bids/proposals are
submitted at the Contractor's own risk. Therefore, no claim shall be
made against the Government to recover bid/proposal costs as a
direct cost whether the request for authorization to enter into the
contract is denied or approved.
(f) To the extent that the work under this contract requires
access to proprietary or confidential business or financial data of
other companies, and as long as such data remains proprietary or
confidential, the Contractor shall protect such data from
unauthorized use and disclosure.
(g) The Contractor agrees to insert in each subcontract or
consultant agreement placed hereunder, except for subcontracts or
consultant agreements for nondiscretionary technical or engineering
services, including treatability studies, well drilling, fence
erecting, plumbing, utility hookups, security guard services, or
electrical services, provisions which shall conform substantially to
the language of this clause, including this paragraph (g) unless
otherwise authorized by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor may
request in writing that the Contracting Officer exempt from this
clause a particular subcontract or consultant agreement for
nondiscretionary technical or engineering services not specifically
listed above, including laboratory analysis. The Contracting Officer
will review and evaluate each request on a case-by-case basis before
approving or disapproving the request.
(h) If the Contractor seeks an expedited decision regarding its
initial future contracting request, the Contractor may submit its
request to both the Contracting Officer and the next administrative
level within the Contracting Officer's organization.
(i) A review process available to the Contractor when an adverse
determination is received shall consist of a request for
reconsideration to the Contracting Officer or a request for review
submitted to the next administrative level within the Contracting
Officer's organization. An adverse determination resulting from a
request for reconsideration by the Contracting Officer will not
preclude the contractor from requesting a review by the next
administrative level. Either a request for review or a request for
reconsideration must be submitted to the appropriate level within 30
calendar days after receipt of the initial adverse determination.
(End of Clause)
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate I (ERRS) (Apr 2004)
* * * * *
(d) During the life of this contract, including any options, the
Contractor agrees that unless otherwise authorized by the
Contracting Officer:
(1) It will not provide any Superfund Technical Assistance and
Removal Team (START); type activities (e.g., START contracts) to EPA
within the Contractor's ERRS assigned geographical area(s), either
as a prime contractor, subcontractor, or consultant.
(2) It will not provide any START type activities (e.g., START
contracts) to EPA as a prime contractor, subcontractor or consultant
at a site where it has performed or plans to perform ERRS work.
(3) It will be ineligible for award of START type activities
contracts for sites within its respective ERRS assigned geographical
[[Page 61571]]
area(s) which result from a CERCLA administrative order, a CERCLA or
RCRA consent decree or a court order.
* * * * *
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate II (Start) (Apr 2004)
* * * * *
(d) During the life of this contract, including any options, the
Contractor agrees that unless otherwise authorized by the
Contracting Officer:
(1) It will not provide to EPA cleanup services (e.g., Emergency
and Rapid Response Services (ERRS) contracts) within the
Contractor's START assigned geographical area(s), either as a prime
Contractor, subcontractor, or consultant.
(2) Unless an individual design for the site has been prepared
by a third party, it will not provide to EPA as a prime contractor,
subcontractor or consultant any remedial construction services at a
site where it has performed or plans to perform START work. This
clause will not preclude START contractors from performing
construction management services under other EPA contracts.
(3) It will be ineligible for award of ERRS type activities
contracts for sites within its respective START assigned
geographical area(s) which result from a CERCLA administrative
order, a CERCLA or RCRA consent decree or a court order.
* * * * *
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate III (ESAT) (Apr 2004)
* * * * *
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate IV (TES) (Apr 2004)
* * * * *
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate V (Headquarters Support)
(Apr 2004)
* * * * *
(c) The Contractor, during the life of this contract, will be
ineligible to enter into a contract with EPA to perform response
action work (e.g., Response Action Contract (RAC), Emergency and
Rapid Response Services (ERRS), Superfund Technical Assistance and
Removal Team (START), and Enforcement Support Services (ESS)
contracts), unless otherwise authorized by the Contracting Officer.
* * * * *
Limitation of Future Contracting Alternate VI (Site Specific) (Apr
2004)
* * * * *
(d) During the life of this contract, including any options, the
Contractor agrees that unless otherwise authorized by the
Contracting Officer:
(1) It will not provide any Superfund Technical Assistance and
Removal Team (START) type activities (e.g., START contracts) to EPA
on the site either as a prime contractor, subcontractor, or
consultant.
* * * * *
1552.215-76 [Removed and reserved]
0
10. Remove and reserve section 1552.215-76.
1552.229-70 [Removed and reserved]
0
11. Remove and reserve section 1552.229-70.
1552.237-73 [Removed and reserved]
0
12. Remove and reserve section 1552.237-73.
[FR Doc. 05-21196 Filed 10-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P