Privacy Act; Implementation, 61589-61590 [05-21113]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth. * * * * * AAL AK E5 Tok Junction, AK [New] Tok Junction Airport, AK (Lat. 63°19′46″ N., long. 142°57′13″ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile radius of the Tok Junction Airport, and that airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within a 64.8-mile radius of the Tok Junction Airport. * * * * * Issued in Anchorage, AK, on October 14, 2005. Judith G. Heckl, Area Director, Alaska Flight Service Operations. [FR Doc. 05–21232 Filed 10–24–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Minerals Management Service 30 CFR Part 250 RIN 1010–AD10 Oil and Gas and Sulphur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)— Plans and Information—Protection of Marine Mammals and Threatened and Endangered Species Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period. AGENCY: SUMMARY: MMS is extending to January 6, 2006, the comment period of the proposed rule titled, ‘‘Oil and Gas and Sulphur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)—Plans and Information—Protection of Marine Mammals and Threatened and Endangered Species’’ published on September 6, 2005 (70 FR 52953). The previous deadline for comments was November 7, 2005. This notice will extend the original 60-day comment period to 120 days. This extension is necessary because of damage caused in the New Orleans area by Hurricane Katrina and the Louisiana/Texas area by Hurricane Rita and subsequent flooding. The extension will provide additional time to the oil and gas industry for reviewing and preparing comments to the rule as it recovers from these disasters. DATES: MMS will consider all comments received by January 6, 2006. MMS will begin reviewing comments then and may not fully consider comments received after January 6, 2006. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:22 Oct 24, 2005 Jkt 208001 You may submit comments on the rulemaking by any of the following methods listed below. Please use the Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) 1010–AD10 in your message. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions on the website for submitting comments. • E-mail MMS at rules.comments@mms.gov. Use 1010– AD10 in the subject line. • Fax: 703–787–1546. Identify with 1010–AD10. • Mail or hand-carry comments to the Department of the Interior; Minerals Management Service; Attention: Rules Processing Team (RPT); 381 Elden Street, MS–4024; Herndon, Virginia 20170–4817. Please reference ‘‘Plans and Information—Protection of Marine Mammals and Threatened and Endangered Species—1010–AD10’’ in your comments. You may also send comments on the information collection aspects of this rule directly to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB Attention: Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior (1010–10) via OMB e-mail: (OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov); or by fax (202) 395–6566; identify with 1010– AD10. Please also send a copy to MMS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kumkum Ray, Regulations and Standards Branch at (703) 787–1604. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Lessees and operators with operations in the Gulf of Mexico Region are engaged in the restoration of normal operations following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The extension of the comment period will allow them, and the public, additional time to review the proposed rule and to comment on it. Accordingly, the Department of the Interior is extending the comment period date by 60 days to end on January 6, 2006. ADDRESSES: Dated: October 17, 2005. Chad Calvert, Acting Assistant Secretary—Land and Minerals Management. [FR Doc. 05–21282 Filed 10–24–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army 32 CFR Part 505 Department of the Army ACTION: Proposed rule. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 SUMMARY: The Department of the Army is proposing to exempt those records contained in A0600–20 DCS, G–1, entitled ‘‘Sexual Assault Data Management System (SADMS) Files’’ when an exemption has been previously claimed for the records in another Privacy Act system of records. The exemption is intended to preserve the exempt status of the record when the purposes underlying the exemption for the original records are still valid and necessary to protect the contents of the records. DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 27, 2005 to be considered by this agency. ADDRESSES: Department of the Army, Freedom of Information/Privacy Division, U.S. Army Records Management and Declassification Agency, Attn: AHRC–PDD–FPZ, 7701 Telegraph Road, Casey Building, Suite 144, Alexandria, VA 22325–3905. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Janice Thornton at (703) 428–6497. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive order. Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they are concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department of Defense. Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) Privacy Act; Implementation AGENCY: 61589 It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense impose no information requirements E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM 25OCP1 61590 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules beyond the Department of Defense and that the information collected within the Department of Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the Privacy Act of 1974. Section 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rulemaking for the Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. claimed for the original record and (B) the purpose underlying the exemption for the original record still pertain to the record which is now contained in this system of records. In general, the exemptions are claimed in order to protect properly classified information relating to national defense and foreign policy, to avoid interference during the conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative actions or investigations, to ensure protective services provided the President and others are not compromised, to protect the identity of confidential sources incident to Federal employment, military service, contract, and security clearance determinations, and to preserve the confidentiality and integrity of Federal evaluation materials. The exemption rule for the original records will identify the specific reasons why the records are exempt from specific provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a. Dated: October 17, 2005. L.M. Bynum, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 05–21113 Filed 10–24–05; 8:45 am] List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 505 Privacy. Accordingly, 32 CFR part 505 is proposed to be amended as follows: BILLING CODE 5001–06–M PART 505—[AMENDED] 40 CFR Part 52 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 505 continues to read as follows: [R09–OAR–2005–CA–0005; FRL–7986–9] Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a). Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Ventura County Air Pollution Control District ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 2. Section 505.5 is amended by adding paragraph (e)(34) as follows: § 505.5 (e) * * * (34) System identifier and name: A0600–20 DCS, G–1, Sexual Assault Data Management System (SADMS) Files. (i) Exemptions: This system of records is a compilation of information from other Department of Defense and U.S. Government systems of records. To the extent that copies of exempt records from those ‘‘other’’ systems of records are entered into this system, OSD hereby claims the same exemptions for the records from those ‘‘other’’ systems that are entered into this system, as claimed for the original primary system of which they are a part. (ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), (k)(4), (k)(5), (k)(6), and (k)(7). (iii) Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a to the extent (A) such provisions have been identified and an exemption VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:22 Oct 24, 2005 Jkt 208001 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: Exemptions. SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from surface cleaning operations. We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by November 25, 2005. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number R09–OAR– 2005–CA–0005, by one of the following methods: 1. Agency Web site: http:// docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. EPA prefers receiving comments through this electronic public docket and comment PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 system. Follow the on-line instructions to submit comments. 2. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions. 3. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 4. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air–4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ , including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through the agency Web site, eRulemaking portal or e-mail. The agency Web site and eRulemaking portal are ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at http://docket.epa.gov/rmepub and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia G. Allen, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local rules: VCAPCD Rules 74.6, 74.6.1, 74.12, 74.13, 74.19, 74.19.1, 74.24, and 74.30. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are approving these local rules in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM 25OCP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 25, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 61589-61590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21113]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

32 CFR Part 505


Privacy Act; Implementation

AGENCY: Department of the Army

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army is proposing to exempt those 
records contained in A0600-20 DCS, G-1, entitled ``Sexual Assault Data 
Management System (SADMS) Files'' when an exemption has been previously 
claimed for the records in another Privacy Act system of records. The 
exemption is intended to preserve the exempt status of the record when 
the purposes underlying the exemption for the original records are 
still valid and necessary to protect the contents of the records.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 27, 2005 to be 
considered by this agency.

ADDRESSES: Department of the Army, Freedom of Information/Privacy 
Division, U.S. Army Records Management and Declassification Agency, 
Attn: AHRC-PDD-FPZ, 7701 Telegraph Road, Casey Building, Suite 144, 
Alexandria, VA 22325-3905.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Janice Thornton at (703) 428-6497.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual 
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a 
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; 
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, 
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious 
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by 
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of 
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and 
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy 
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or 
the principles set forth in this Executive order.

Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number 
of small entities because they are concerned only with the 
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department 
of Defense.

Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense impose no information requirements

[[Page 61590]]

beyond the Department of Defense and that the information collected 
within the Department of Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 
U.S.C. 552a, known as the Privacy Act of 1974.

Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rulemaking for the 
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may 
result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and 
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments.

Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of 
Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have 
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 505

    Privacy.

    Accordingly, 32 CFR part 505 is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 505--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 505 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).

    2. Section 505.5 is amended by adding paragraph (e)(34) as follows:


Sec.  505.5  Exemptions.

    (e) * * *
    (34) System identifier and name: A0600-20 DCS, G-1, Sexual Assault 
Data Management System (SADMS) Files.
    (i) Exemptions: This system of records is a compilation of 
information from other Department of Defense and U.S. Government 
systems of records. To the extent that copies of exempt records from 
those ``other'' systems of records are entered into this system, OSD 
hereby claims the same exemptions for the records from those ``other'' 
systems that are entered into this system, as claimed for the original 
primary system of which they are a part.
    (ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), 
(k)(4), (k)(5), (k)(6), and (k)(7).
    (iii) Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C. 
552a to the extent (A) such provisions have been identified and an 
exemption claimed for the original record and (B) the purpose 
underlying the exemption for the original record still pertain to the 
record which is now contained in this system of records. In general, 
the exemptions are claimed in order to protect properly classified 
information relating to national defense and foreign policy, to avoid 
interference during the conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative 
actions or investigations, to ensure protective services provided the 
President and others are not compromised, to protect the identity of 
confidential sources incident to Federal employment, military service, 
contract, and security clearance determinations, and to preserve the 
confidentiality and integrity of Federal evaluation materials. The 
exemption rule for the original records will identify the specific 
reasons why the records are exempt from specific provisions of 5 U.S.C. 
552a.

    Dated: October 17, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-21113 Filed 10-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M