Emergency Order Requiring Special Handling, Instruction and Testing of Railroad Operating Rules Pertaining to Hand-Operated Main Track Switches, 61496-61504 [05-21253]
Download as PDF
61496
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Notices
REPORTING BURDEN
Emergency order item No.
Respondent
universe
Total annual
responses
Average time per
response
Total annual
burden hours
(1)—Instruction On Railroad Operating Rule—Operation of manual
main track in non-signal territory.
—Instruction Records ..................
(2) Hand-Operated Main Track
Switches—Confirmation of Switch
Position.
—Review of SPAF by Train Dispatcher.
(3) Switch Position Awareness Form
(SPAF).
(4) Job Briefings ..................................
685 Railroads;
100,000 employees.
685 Railroads .......
6,000 Dispatchers
100,000 instruction
sessions.
60 minutes ...........
100,000 ................
$4,700,000.
100,000 records ...
60,000 verbal confirmations.
2 minutes .............
30 seconds ...........
3,333 ....................
500 .......................
126,654.
20,500.
6,000 Dispatchers
15,000 reviews .....
10 seconds ..........
42 .........................
1,974.
100,000 employees.
100,000 employees.
100,000 employees.
20,000 forms ........
3 minutes .............
1,000 ....................
47,000.
60,000 briefings ...
1 minute ...............
1,000 ....................
47,000.
60,000 verbal
communications.
15 seconds ...........
250 .......................
11,750.
900,000 Crew
members.
685 Railroads .......
500 form entries ...
5 seconds ............
3 ...........................
141.
Burden Covered
Under OMB No.
2130–0035.
100,000 copies ....
Burden Covered
Under OMB No.
2130–0035.
2 seconds ............
Burden Covered
Under OMB No.
2130–0035.
56 .........................
Burden Covered
Under OMB No.
2130–0035.
2,128.
100,000 receipts +
100,000 records.
1 second + 1 second.
56 .........................
2,380.
10 petitions ...........
60 minutes ...........
10 .........................
380.
(5) Radio Communication—Crewmember communication with engineer.
—Notation of Inoperable Radio
on SPAF.
(6) Operational Tests and Inspections
(7) Distribution of Emergency Order—
Copies to Employees.
—Written Receipt and Acknowledgment of Copy.
(8) Relief—Petitions For Special Approval.
685 Railroads;
100,000 Employees.
685 Railroads;
100,000 Employees.
685 Railroads .......
Form Number(s): N/A.
Respondent Universe: 685 Railroads;
100,000 Railroad Employees.
Frequency of Submission: One-time;
On occasion.
Total Responses: 715,510.
Total Annual Estimated Burden:
106,250 hours.
Status: Emergency Review.
Description: FRA has determined that
public safety compels the issuance of
Emergency Order No. 24 and
necessitates this collection of
information in order that railroads
modify their operating rules and take
certain other actions necessary to ensure
that their employees who operate handoperated main track switches in nonsignaled territory restore the switches to
their proper (normal) position after use.
The Emergency Order is intended to
reduce the risk of serious injury or death
both to railroad employees and the
general public.
Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5
CFR 1320.5(b), 1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA
informs all interested parties that it may
not conduct or sponsor, and a
respondent is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:19 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
Total annual
burden cost
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 19,
2005.
Belinda Ashton,
Acting Director, Office of Budget, Federal
Railroad Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–21250 Filed 10–21–05; 8:45 am]
compensated by a railroad or by a
contractor to a railroad to perform any
of the duties defined in this EO. This EO
is intended to reduce the risk of serious
injury or death both to railroad
employees and the general public.
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
Emergency Order Requiring Special
Handling, Instruction and Testing of
Railroad Operating Rules Pertaining to
Hand-Operated Main Track Switches
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Douglas H. Taylor, Staff Director,
Operating Practices Division, Office of
Safety Assurance and Compliance, FRA,
1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., RRS–11,
Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC 20590
(telephone 202–493–6255); or Alan H.
Nagler, Senior Trial Attorney, Office of
Chief Counsel, FRA, 1120 Vermont
Avenue, NW., RCC–11, Mail Stop 10,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202–
493–6038).
SUMMARY: The Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) of the United
States Department of Transportation
(DOT) has determined that public safety
compels issuance of this Emergency
Order (EO) requiring railroads to modify
their operating rules and take certain
other actions necessary to ensure that
railroad employees who dispatch nonsignaled territory or who operate handoperated main track switches (switches)
in non-signaled territory, ensure the
switches are restored to their proper
(normal) position after use. For
purposes of this EO, ‘‘employee’’ means
an individual who is engaged or
AUTHORITY: Authority to enforce Federal
railroad safety laws has been delegated
by the Secretary of Transportation to the
Federal Railroad Administrator. 49 CFR
1.49. Railroads are subject to FRA’s
safety jurisdiction under the Federal
railroad safety laws. 49 U.S.C. 20101,
20103. FRA is authorized to issue
emergency orders where an unsafe
condition or practice ‘‘causes an
emergency situation involving a hazard
of death or personal injury.’’ 49 U.S.C.
20104. These orders may immediately
impose ‘‘restrictions and prohibitions
* * * that may be necessary to abate the
situation.’’ (Ibid.)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[FRA Emergency Order No. 24; Docket No.
FRA–2005–22796, Notice No. 1]
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Notices
FRA’s regulations, at 49
CFR part 217, require each railroad to
instruct its employees on the meaning
and application of its code of operating
rules, and to periodically test its
employees to determine their level of
compliance. Railroad operating rules
pertaining to the operation of switches
provide that the normal position for a
main track switch is lined and locked
for movement on the main track when
not in use. Another related operating
rule provides that, where trains or
engines are required to report clear of
the main track, such a report must not
be made until the switch and derail, if
provided, have been secured in their
normal position. Where no signal or
other system is in service that indicates
through wayside or cab signals, or both,
the possibility that a main track switch
may not be in its normal position,
compliance with these railroad
operating rules is the critical element in
ensuring route integrity for main track
movements.
There may be more than one cause
that contributes to non-compliance with
these important operating rules. One
recurrent scenario of non-compliance
occurs when a train crew has exclusive
authority to occupy a specific track
segment until they release it for other
movements and that train crew goes off
duty without lining and locking a handoperated main track switch in its normal
position. In that scenario, the train
crew’s mistake in leaving a main track
switch lined for movement to a
secondary track was the last act or
omission that resulted in a catastrophic
accident.
During the years 2000 through 2003,
railroads reported no more than three
accidents per year that were caused by
improperly lined hand-operated main
track switches in non-signaled territory
and one of the most serious of those
wrecks was caused by vandalism.
During that four year period, there were
ten total injuries and two fatalities (all
to railroad employees).
In comparison, in 2004 there was a
sharp increase in the frequency and
severity of collisions resulting from
improperly lined main track switches as
shown on the attached charts. In 2004,
there were a total of eight accidents
resulting in eight injuries to railroad
employees. The increase in the number
of accidents and injuries did not go
unnoticed by the industry as some
railroads amended their operating rules
to address this issue.
On January 6, 2005, the issue of
improperly lined main track switches
became national news as the media
reported on a catastrophic accident that
occurred in Graniteville, South
BACKGROUND:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:19 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
Carolina. This accident occurred when
a Norfolk Southern Railway Company
(NS) freight train was unexpectedly
diverted from the main track onto an
industrial lead. The NS train struck a
standing train on the industrial lead,
derailing three locomotives and 16 cars.
The collision resulted in the rupture of
a tank car containing chlorine, fatal
injuries to eight citizens and one
railroad employee, the evacuation of
5,400 local residents, and injuries to 630
people. Damages to equipment and track
totaled more than $2.3 million. FRA
immediately began deliberating on a
course of action to prevent this type of
accident. [The National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB) is investigating
this accident, and will officially
determine the probable cause of the
accident which FRA is expressly not
doing.]
On January 8, 2005, a BNSF Railway
Company (BNSF) freight train was
unexpectedly diverted onto an
industrial track in Bieber, California.
The BNSF train struck two loaded grain
cars, derailing seven locomotives and 14
cars. Two railroad employees were
injured. Damages to equipment and
track totaled more than $1 million.
FRA decided to start a rulemaking
proceeding and took action on January
10, 2005, to abate the safety risks during
the proceeding by issuing Safety
Advisory 2005–01, Position of Switches
in Non-Signaled Territory (Safety
Advisory). The issuance of a safety
advisory is an opportunity for the
agency to inform the industry and the
general public regarding a safety issue,
to articulate agency policy, and to make
recommendations. FRA explained in the
Safety Advisory that ‘‘[a] review of
FRA’s accident/incident data shows
that, overall, the safety of rail
transportation continues to improve.
However, FRA has particular concern
that recent accidents on Class I railroads
in non-signaled territory were caused, or
apparently caused, by the failure of
railroad employees to return manual
(hand-operated) main track switches to
their normal position, i.e., lined for the
main track, after use. As a result, rather
than continuing their intended
movement on the main track, trains
approaching these switches in a facingpoint direction were unexpectedly
diverted from the main track onto the
diverging route, and consequently
derailed.’’
FRA also explained what we could do
if the emergency situation did not abate.
That is, in the Safety Advisory, FRA
stated that we would consider ‘‘the need
for any additional action to address this
situation, such as regulatory action or
additional advisories. We are
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61497
considering the form that any additional
action might take, its specific content,
and any necessary variations based on
differing types of operations * * *. We
are committed to taking whatever action
appears necessary to prevent any further
death or serious injury that might arise
from additional failures to comply with
the basic operating rules concerning the
proper positioning of main track
switches.’’
FRA’s decision to make
recommendations was based in part on
the fact that several railroads had
already initiated voluntary actions to
enhance the applicable railroad
operating rules during the last few
months of 2004. FRA wanted to give all
railroads the same opportunity to selfcorrect in the expectation that it would
suffice to ameliorate this problem until,
as discussed below, a rule could be
issued. Furthermore, the purpose of the
Safety Advisory was to heighten
employee awareness of the importance
of restoring main track switches to their
normal position in non-signaled
territory. A key element of the Safety
Advisory was to promote and enhance
intra-crew communication about the
operation and position of main track
switches.
With the exception of a similar
accident that occurred on CSX
Transportation (CSX) in Banks,
Alabama, on January 11, 2005, one day
after publication of the Safety Advisory,
and an accident, with relatively minor
results, that was caused by an employee
of a contractor to the Nashville and
Eastern Railroad (NERR), in Mt. Juliet,
Tennessee on February 23, 2005, there
was a respite of nearly six months in
accidents resulting from improperly
lined main track switches in nonsignaled territory. During this respite,
FRA began a rulemaking on this subject
and other human factor causes of
accidents. For about the last decade,
FRA has sought recommendations from
its standing Federal advisory committee
on most of the subjects on which FRA
proposed to issue substantive safety
rules. In FRA’s view, this process
produces better rules because it
generates more substantive participation
in rulemakings from experts
representing both management and
labor, and yields better and faster
compliance with the final rule from the
regulated community which helped
craft it. On May 18, 2005, at the first
opportunity to address this subject, the
Railroad Safety Advisory Committee
(RSAC or Committee) agreed to take up
the task of reviewing how to reduce
human factor caused train accidents/
incidents and related employee injuries.
The full Committee formed a smaller
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
61498
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Notices
Operating Rules Working Group
(Working Group) comprised of people
expert in this subject to do the bulk of
the work in formulating
recommendations to complete the task,
and a target date of February 10, 2006,
was established for the Working Group
to report its findings and
recommendations back to the full RSAC.
Since May, the Working Group has
met twice and progress toward a
consensus recommendation has been
made. One of the key elements in those
discussions is the proper operation of
main track switches in non-signaled
territory. Through the Working Group’s
activities, FRA has already heard
comments on this issue from
organizations representing every
affected party within the industry. The
Working Group has three additional
meetings scheduled in order to meet the
February deadline for
recommendations. FRA’s goal is to
publish a proposed rule in 2006, and a
final rule soon thereafter.
Working with a Federal advisory
committee to generate consensus
recommendations takes many meetings
over a number of months, and
rulemaking can take many more
months. During the time it takes to
accomplish these tasks, new accidents
can occur that require more immediate
action. That has happened here. After
six months, the Safety Advisory no
longer worked well enough to prevent
more accidents.
First, in July 2005, two accidents,
with relatively minor results occurred.
As the results were minor, and, FRA
believed awareness was heightened due
to the publication of the Safety Advisory
and the RSAC’s activities, FRA did not
identify an emergency situation in July.
The following is a synopsis of those two
accidents.
• July 7, 2005—Willamette & Pacific
Railroad (WPRR), Sheridan, Oregon—a
maintenance of way work train was
parked in a siding and the switch was
left lined for the siding. A local freight
train, operating at a speed of 12 miles
per hour (mph), was unintentionally
diverted into the siding due to an
improperly lined switch. The freight
train struck the lead locomotive of the
standing work train. Both locomotives
derailed.
• July 9, 2005—Dakota, Minnesota
and Eastern Railroad (DME), Florence,
Minnesota—the crew of an eastward
BNSF light locomotive consist departing
DME property and returning to BNSF
trackage, failed to restore the junction
switch to its normal position.
Subsequently, an eastward DME train,
operating at a speed of 38 mph,
encountered an improperly lined
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:19 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
switch. As a result, the lead locomotive
derailed and was destroyed.
Beginning six weeks later, three more
accidents occurred with more serious
results. The three recent accidents
described below occurred over a 28-day
period and clearly demonstrate the need
for additional action beyond the Safety
Advisory, as these three collisions,
overall, resulted in fatal injuries to one
railroad employee, non-fatal injuries to
eight additional railroad employees, an
evacuation of civilians, and railroad
property damage of approximately two
million dollars. Furthermore, each of
these accidents could have been worse,
as each had the potential for additional
deaths, injuries, property damage or
environmental damage. Two of the
accidents could have involved
catastrophic releases of hazardous
materials as these materials were
present in at least one of the train
consists that collided.
• August 19, 2005—Kansas &
Oklahoma Railroad (KO), Nickerson,
Kansas—an eastward loaded grain train
was operating at a speed of 26 mph
when it encountered an improperly
lined switch at the west end of the
siding. The train struck a standing cut
of cars, resulting in the derailment of
two locomotives and two freight cars.
The locomotive engineer was severely
injured.
• August 21, 2005—Union Pacific
Railroad (UP), Heber, California—an
eastward freight train operating at a
speed of 30 mph encountered an
improperly lined switch at the west end
of a siding. The train struck a standing
cut of cars, resulting in the derailment
of two locomotives and two freight cars.
The control compartment on the lead
locomotive was completely destroyed.
The three crewmembers survived only
by quickly throwing themselves on the
floor of the locomotive immediately
before impact. Considering the
destruction to the locomotive control
compartment, the crewmembers likely
would have been seriously injured or
killed, but for their quick action. The
locomotive engineer, conductor and
trainman were taken to a local hospital
where they were treated and released.
• September 15, 2005—UP,
Shepherd, Texas—a southward freight
train operating at a speed of 36 mph,
collided head-on with a northward UP
freight train that was standing in a
siding. The collision occurred when the
southward train encountered an
improperly lined switch at the north
end of the siding. The southward train
struck the standing train and derailed
two locomotives and 13 cars. The two
locomotives and the four leading cars of
the standing train were also derailed.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The engineer of the standing train was
fatally injured and four other
crewmembers were injured. Eleven of
the 13 cars contained hazardous
materials. Although, no hazardous
materials release occurred, a
precautionary evacuation of 500 people
was ordered by local authorities for a
period of 12 hours.
Each of the accidents that precipitated
the Safety Advisory and this EO either
resulted in, or had the potential to result
in, serious injuries, fatalities, and
catastrophic releases of hazardous
materials. As previously stated, the
industry achieved only a temporary
respite from accidents of this type after
the Safety Advisory’s publication,
instead of the long-term solution that
FRA expected. The sudden and recent
occurrence of five of this type of
accident is a clear indication that the
Safety Advisory has lost its
effectiveness. Only with additional
action can FRA secure compliance with
these important railroad operating rules.
FRA considered issuing another Safety
Advisory, but that might at best only
provide another temporary pause. As
described above, FRA is currently
seeking a permanent solution through
rulemaking. The issuance of this EO is
intended to accomplish what the Safety
Advisory could not: Implement safety
practices that will abate the emergency
until FRA can complete rulemaking
after receiving the RSAC’s expert
advice.
Finding and Order: Collisions, deaths
and injuries resulting from improperly
lined main track switches began in 2004
to rise very sharply as shown on the
attached charts. FRA’s issuance of a
Safety Advisory in early January 2005,
recommending practices designed to
prevent such events, led to a nearly six
month respite. The sharply rising and
accelerating trend of collisions, deaths
and injuries resulting from improperly
lined main track switches, which the
Safety Advisory abated only
temporarily, constitutes an emergency
situation involving a hazard of death or
personal injury which FRA must act to
stop.
Even considering the nearly sixmonth respite from January 12 through
July 6, the Nation has experienced more
accidents resulting from improperly
lined hand-operated switches on main
track in non-signaled territory than it
experienced in any of the previous five
years. To date in 2005, there were nine
accidents resulting in 640 injuries and
10 fatalities. Given the cloud of chlorine
that covered much of Graniteville,
South Carolina, on January 6, 2005, as
a result of one of these accidents, it is
fortuitous that the death toll is not
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Notices
significantly higher; in addition, the
same could be said for the Nickerson,
Kansas and Shepherd, Texas accidents
that occurred on August 19, 2005 and
September 15, 2005 respectively as
trains involved in those accidents were
transporting tank cars containing
hazardous materials. Any reasonable
extrapolation of the current trends of
wrecks, deaths, and injuries makes clear
that more accidents of this type will
occur in the absence of this EO, that
many of those accidents will result in
injuries or deaths, or both, that a
significant percentage of those wrecks
will involve trains carrying hazardous
materials, and that each of those wrecks
will pose a significant risk that a large
amount of hazardous material will be
released. Considering the severity of
accidents related to improperly lined
hand-operated main track switches in
non-signaled territory, the prevalence of
hazardous materials on trains in nonsignaled territory, and the recent and
dramatic increase in the rate of
occurrence of these accidents, decisive
action is necessary now.
FRA concludes that non-compliance
with certain operating rules and
practices on the Nation’s railroads
concerning the proper positioning of
hand-operated main track switches in
non-signaled territory lacking the
safeguards of facing point protection is
a combination of unsafe conditions and
practices which causes an emergency
situation involving an imminent and
unacceptable hazard of death or
personal injury. FRA further concludes
that reliance solely on employee
compliance with railroad operating
rules related to the operation of handoperated main track switches in nonsignaled territory, without a Federal
enforcement mechanism, is inadequate
to protect the public safety.
FRA also considered whether to apply
this EO nationwide or limit it to those
railroads that have had recent accidents.
A review of the 2005 accidents reveals
that four major railroads and four other,
smaller railroads were involved in
accidents. On June 12, 2004, an alert
Amtrak engineer made a full service
application of the train brake and
stopped three car lengths into a siding,
thereby avoiding a potentially serious
accident on CSX track in Apex, North
Carolina. Going back to 2000, five
additional smaller railroads were
involved in accidents. Over the last six
years, 41% of this type of accident has
had at least one train consist involved
that was carrying hazardous material,
i.e., 11 out of 27 accidents. Given the
wide distribution of the accidents across
various railroads, the similarity of
physical conditions and operating
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:19 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
practices among railroads of all sizes
nationwide, the high number of new
and inexperienced operating employees
on many railroads, and the very high
potential for serious harm, limiting the
EO’s effectiveness to only a small
number of railroads would be an
unjustifiable risk to public safety and
the safety of railroad employees.
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority of 49 U.S.C. 20104, delegated
to me by the Secretary of Transportation
(49 CFR 1.49), it is hereby ordered that
each railroad and its employees,
including employees of a contractor to
a railroad, who operate hand-operated
main track switches in non-signaled
territory and who dispatch non-signaled
territory, do, at a minimum, the
following:
(1) Instruction
Each employee subject to this EO
shall be instructed on this EO and the
railroad’s operating rules relating to the
operation of hand-operated main track
switches in non-signaled territory. The
subject matter of the instruction shall
include, but not be limited to:
• Operation of main track switches;
• Position of main track switches;
• Restoring main track switches to
their normal position;
• Securing (locking) main track
switches;
• Correspondence of switch targets to
switch position;
• Clearing limits of main track
authority;
• Job briefings; and
• Switch Position Awareness Form
(SPAF).
After receiving initial instruction, all
employees must receive periodic
instruction, in accordance with 49 CFR
217.11. Railroads shall maintain records
of both initial and periodic instruction
available for inspection and copying by
representatives of the FRA during
normal business hours. These records
shall be maintained for a period of at
least two years following the end of the
calendar year during which the
instruction was conducted.
(2) Hand-Operated Main Track
Switches
Employees operating hand-operated
main track switches in non-signaled
territory shall be qualified on the
railroad’s operating rules relating to
their operation. No employee is
permitted to operate or verify the
position of a hand-operated main track
switch in non-signaled territory unless
that person is qualified on the railroad’s
operating rules relating to their
operation.
Employees operating hand-operated
main track switches in non-signaled
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61499
territory are individually responsible for
the proper operation of these switches,
including restoration to their normal
position after use. Employees operating
hand-operated main track switches in
non-signaled territory must visually
ensure that:
• Hand-operated main track switches
are properly lined for the intended
route; and
• The switch points fit properly and
the switch target, if so equipped,
corresponds with the switch’s position.
The normal position of a main track
switch shall be designated by the
railroad and the switch must be lined
and locked in that position when not in
use, except when the switch is left in
the charge of a crewmember of another
train or the train dispatcher directs
otherwise. When switches are not being
operated, they must be locked, hooked
or latched if so equipped.
Before releasing the limits of a main
track authority, the employee releasing
the limits must report to the train
dispatcher that all hand-operated main
track switches operated have been
restored to their normal position, unless
the train dispatcher directs otherwise.
The train dispatcher must confirm the
switch positions with the employee
releasing the limits before clearing the
limits of the authority. Additionally, in
the case of a train, the train dispatcher
must confirm that both the conductor
and engineer have initialed the SPAF as
required.
(3) Switch Position Awareness Form
(SPAF)
Employees operating hand-operated
main track switches in non-signaled
territory shall complete a SPAF.
Employees are individually responsible
for the proper completion of these
forms. The form must contain:
• Train symbol, job number or other
unique identifier;
• Date;
• Subdivision;
• Employee’s name; in the case of a
train, both the Engineer’s and
Conductor’s names;
• Name and location of each main
track switch operated by any employee;
• Time switch was initially reversed;
• Time switch was finally returned to
the normal position;
• Initials of the employee handling
the switch;
• Engineer’s initials for each entry;
and
• Conductor’s signature when the
form is completed.
Entries made with respect to a
specific hand-operated main track
switch in non-signaled territory must be
recorded as soon as practicable after the
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
61500
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Notices
switch is reversed, and as soon as
practicable after the switch is returned
to its normal position before leaving the
location. All information required on
the SPAF must be entered before an
employee reports clear of the limits of
the main track authority. SPAFs shall be
retained for a period of five days and
made available to representatives of the
FRA for inspection and copying.
(4) Job Briefings
Job briefings shall be conducted by
employees in connection with the
operation of hand-operated main track
switches in non-signaled territory:
• Before work is begun;
• Each time a work plan is changed;
and
• At completion of the work.
(5) Radio Communication
In the case of a train, each time a
crewmember operates, i.e., changes the
position of, a hand-operated main track
switch in non-signaled territory, the
crewmember shall communicate with
the engineer by radio while physically
at the switch location, stating the switch
name and location, and the position of
the switch (normal/reverse). Before
movement may occur, the engineer must
acknowledge that information by radio.
If radios become inoperable, all
crewmembers must conduct a job
briefing regarding the use of handoperated main track switches in nonsignaled territory before use, noting the
inoperable radio on the SPAF.
(6) Operational Tests and Inspections
The railroad’s program of operational
tests and inspections under 49 CFR part
217 shall be revised as necessary to
include the requirements of this EO, and
shall specifically provide for a
minimum number of such tests per year.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:19 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
(7) Distribution of Emergency Order
A copy of this EO shall be provided
to all employees affected by this EO. A
written receipt or acknowledgment must
be retained permanently for each
affected employee.
Relief: Petitions for special approval
to take actions not in accordance with
this EO may be submitted to the
Associate Administrator for Safety, who
shall be authorized to dispose of those
requests without the necessity of
amending this EO. In reviewing any
petition for special review, the
Associate Administrator for Safety shall
only grant petitions in which a
petitioner has clearly articulated an
alternative action that will provide, in
the Associate Administrator for Safety’s
judgment, at least an equivalent level of
safety as this EO provides. A copy of
this petition should be submitted to the
Docket Clerk, Department of
Transportation Central Docket
Management System, Nassif Building,
Room Pl-401, 400 Seventh St., SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. The form of
such request may be in written or
electronic form consistent with the
standards and requirements established
by the Central Docket Management
System and posted on its Web site at
https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA recognizes that certain railroad
operating rules or equipment used by
some railroads already provide a level of
safety equivalent to this EO. If all of a
railroad’s hand-operated main track
switches in non-signaled territory are
covered by one or more of the protective
measures identified below, a railroad
need not apply for relief from this EO
as relief shall be deemed automatically
granted. Relief from this EO is
automatically granted when:
• Operating rules require trains to
approach all facing point hand-operated
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
switches in non-signaled territory
prepared to stop;
• Hand-operated main track switches
in non-signaled territory (unless out of
service) are protected by distant switch
indicators; or
• Hand-operated main track switches
in non-signaled territory are protected
by switch point indicators, e.g., BNSF’s
automatic switches and CSX’s self
restoring switches, unless these
switches are operated by hand.
Penalties: Any violation of this EO
shall subject the person committing the
violation to a civil penalty of up to
$27,000. 49 U.S.C. 21301, 28 U.S.C.
2461, and see 69 FR 30591 (May 28,
2004). ‘‘Person’’ is defined by statute to
include corporations, companies,
associations, firms, partnerships,
societies, and joint stock companies, as
well as individuals. 1 U.S.C. 1. FRA
may, through the Attorney General, also
seek injunctive relief to enforce this EO.
49 U.S.C. 20112.
Effective Date and Notice to Affected
Persons: Upon issuance of this EO,
railroads shall immediately initiate
steps to implement this EO. Railroads
shall complete implementation no later
than November 22, 2005. Notice of this
EO will be provided by publishing it in
the Federal Register.
Review: Opportunity for review of this
EO will be provided in accordance with
49 U.S.C. 20104(b) and section 554 of
Title 5 of the United States Code.
Administrative procedures governing
such review are found at 49 CFR part
211. See 49 CFR 211.47, 211.71, 211.73,
211.75, and 211.77.
Issued in Washington, DC on October 19,
2005.
Joseph H. Boardman,
Administrator.
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:19 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
61501
EN24OC05.000
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Notices
15:19 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
EN24OC05.001
61502
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:19 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
61503
EN24OC05.002
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Notices
61504
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Notices
[FR Doc. 05–21253 Filed 10–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–C
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket: RSPA–98–4957]
Request for Public Comments and
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Approval of an Existing
Information Collection (2137–0601)
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
SUMMARY: This notice requests public
participation in the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval process for the renewal of an
existing PHMSA information collection.
In compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) described
below has been forwarded to OMB for
extension of the currently approved
collection. The ICR describes the nature
of the information collection and the
expected burden. PHMSA published a
Federal Register Notice soliciting
comments on the following information
collection and received none. The
purpose of this notice is to allow the
public an additional 30 days from the
date of this notice to submit comments.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before November 23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, Attention DOT
Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Fuentevilla, (202) 366–6199, by
e-mail at William.Fuentevilla@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments
are invited on whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Department, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
Department’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed information collections;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques of
other forms of information technology.
PHMSA published a Federal Register
Notice with a 60-day comment period
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:19 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
for this ICR on August 11, 2005 (70 FR
46915).
Underwater pipelines are being
abandoned at an increasing rate as older
facilities reach the end of their useful
life. This trend is expected to continue.
In 1992, Congress responded to this
issue by amending the Pipeline Safety
Act (49 U.S.C. 60108(c)(6)(B)). The Act
directs the Secretary of Transportation
to require operators of an offshore
pipeline facility, or a pipeline crossing
navigable waters, to report the
abandonment to the Secretary of
Transportation in a way that specifies
whether the facility has been abandoned
properly according to applicable Federal
and State requirements. PHMSA’s
regulations for abandonment reporting
can be found at 49 CFR 192.727 and
195.402.
This information collection supports
the DOT strategic goal of safety by
reducing the number of fatalities,
injuries, and amount of property
damage.
As used in this notice, ‘‘information
collection’’ includes all work related to
preparing and disseminating
information related to this
recordkeeping requirement including
completing paperwork, gathering
information and conducting telephone
calls.
Type of Information Collection
Request: Renewal of Existing Collection.
Title of Information Collection:
Pipeline Safety Reports of Abandoned
Underwater Pipelines
Respondents: Gas and hazardous
liquid pipeline operators.
Estimated Number of Respondents
per Year: 10.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 60 hours.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 18,
2005.
Florence L. Hamn,
Director of Regulations, Office of Pipeline
Safety.
[FR Doc. 05–21140 Filed 10–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket: RSPA–98–4957]
Request for Public Comments and
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Approval of an Existing
Information Collection (2137–0600)
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(PHMSA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
SUMMARY: This notice requests public
participation in the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval process for the renewal of an
existing PHMSA information collection.
In compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) described
below has been forwarded to OMB for
extension of the currently approved
collection. The ICR describes the nature
of the information collection and the
expected burden. PHMSA published a
Federal Register Notice soliciting
comments on the following collection of
information and received none. The
purpose of this notice is to allow the
public an additional 30 days from the
date of this notice to submit comments.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before November 23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725–17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, Attention DOT
Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Fuentevilla, (202) 366–6199, by
e-mail at William.Fuentevilla@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments
are invited on whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Department, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
Department’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed information collections;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques of
other forms of information technology.
PHMSA published a Federal Register
Notice with a 60-day comment period
for this ICR on August 11, 2005 (70 FR
46914).
Congress expressed concern with
unskilled pipeline personnel in the
Pipeline Safety and Reauthorization Act
of 1988 (Pub. L. 100–561). This Act
authorized the Secretary of
Transportation to require all individuals
responsible for the operation and
maintenance of pipeline facilities to be
properly qualified to safely perform
their tasks. The operator qualification
requirements are described in the
pipeline safety regulations at 49 CFR
part 192, subpart N and 49 CFR part
195, subpart G.
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 204 (Monday, October 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61496-61504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21253]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[FRA Emergency Order No. 24; Docket No. FRA-2005-22796, Notice No. 1]
Emergency Order Requiring Special Handling, Instruction and
Testing of Railroad Operating Rules Pertaining to Hand-Operated Main
Track Switches
Summary: The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) of the United States
Department of Transportation (DOT) has determined that public safety
compels issuance of this Emergency Order (EO) requiring railroads to
modify their operating rules and take certain other actions necessary
to ensure that railroad employees who dispatch non-signaled territory
or who operate hand-operated main track switches (switches) in non-
signaled territory, ensure the switches are restored to their proper
(normal) position after use. For purposes of this EO, ``employee''
means an individual who is engaged or compensated by a railroad or by a
contractor to a railroad to perform any of the duties defined in this
EO. This EO is intended to reduce the risk of serious injury or death
both to railroad employees and the general public.
For Further Information Contact: Douglas H. Taylor, Staff Director,
Operating Practices Division, Office of Safety Assurance and
Compliance, FRA, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., RRS-11, Mail Stop 25,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202-493-6255); or Alan H. Nagler,
Senior Trial Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel, FRA, 1120 Vermont
Avenue, NW., RCC-11, Mail Stop 10, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202-
493-6038).
Authority: Authority to enforce Federal railroad safety laws has been
delegated by the Secretary of Transportation to the Federal Railroad
Administrator. 49 CFR 1.49. Railroads are subject to FRA's safety
jurisdiction under the Federal railroad safety laws. 49 U.S.C. 20101,
20103. FRA is authorized to issue emergency orders where an unsafe
condition or practice ``causes an emergency situation involving a
hazard of death or personal injury.'' 49 U.S.C. 20104. These orders may
immediately impose ``restrictions and prohibitions * * * that may be
necessary to abate the situation.'' (Ibid.)
[[Page 61497]]
Background: FRA's regulations, at 49 CFR part 217, require each
railroad to instruct its employees on the meaning and application of
its code of operating rules, and to periodically test its employees to
determine their level of compliance. Railroad operating rules
pertaining to the operation of switches provide that the normal
position for a main track switch is lined and locked for movement on
the main track when not in use. Another related operating rule provides
that, where trains or engines are required to report clear of the main
track, such a report must not be made until the switch and derail, if
provided, have been secured in their normal position. Where no signal
or other system is in service that indicates through wayside or cab
signals, or both, the possibility that a main track switch may not be
in its normal position, compliance with these railroad operating rules
is the critical element in ensuring route integrity for main track
movements.
There may be more than one cause that contributes to non-compliance
with these important operating rules. One recurrent scenario of non-
compliance occurs when a train crew has exclusive authority to occupy a
specific track segment until they release it for other movements and
that train crew goes off duty without lining and locking a hand-
operated main track switch in its normal position. In that scenario,
the train crew's mistake in leaving a main track switch lined for
movement to a secondary track was the last act or omission that
resulted in a catastrophic accident.
During the years 2000 through 2003, railroads reported no more than
three accidents per year that were caused by improperly lined hand-
operated main track switches in non-signaled territory and one of the
most serious of those wrecks was caused by vandalism. During that four
year period, there were ten total injuries and two fatalities (all to
railroad employees).
In comparison, in 2004 there was a sharp increase in the frequency
and severity of collisions resulting from improperly lined main track
switches as shown on the attached charts. In 2004, there were a total
of eight accidents resulting in eight injuries to railroad employees.
The increase in the number of accidents and injuries did not go
unnoticed by the industry as some railroads amended their operating
rules to address this issue.
On January 6, 2005, the issue of improperly lined main track
switches became national news as the media reported on a catastrophic
accident that occurred in Graniteville, South Carolina. This accident
occurred when a Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NS) freight train was
unexpectedly diverted from the main track onto an industrial lead. The
NS train struck a standing train on the industrial lead, derailing
three locomotives and 16 cars. The collision resulted in the rupture of
a tank car containing chlorine, fatal injuries to eight citizens and
one railroad employee, the evacuation of 5,400 local residents, and
injuries to 630 people. Damages to equipment and track totaled more
than $2.3 million. FRA immediately began deliberating on a course of
action to prevent this type of accident. [The National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB) is investigating this accident, and will officially
determine the probable cause of the accident which FRA is expressly not
doing.]
On January 8, 2005, a BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) freight train was
unexpectedly diverted onto an industrial track in Bieber, California.
The BNSF train struck two loaded grain cars, derailing seven
locomotives and 14 cars. Two railroad employees were injured. Damages
to equipment and track totaled more than $1 million.
FRA decided to start a rulemaking proceeding and took action on
January 10, 2005, to abate the safety risks during the proceeding by
issuing Safety Advisory 2005-01, Position of Switches in Non-Signaled
Territory (Safety Advisory). The issuance of a safety advisory is an
opportunity for the agency to inform the industry and the general
public regarding a safety issue, to articulate agency policy, and to
make recommendations. FRA explained in the Safety Advisory that ``[a]
review of FRA's accident/incident data shows that, overall, the safety
of rail transportation continues to improve. However, FRA has
particular concern that recent accidents on Class I railroads in non-
signaled territory were caused, or apparently caused, by the failure of
railroad employees to return manual (hand-operated) main track switches
to their normal position, i.e., lined for the main track, after use. As
a result, rather than continuing their intended movement on the main
track, trains approaching these switches in a facing-point direction
were unexpectedly diverted from the main track onto the diverging
route, and consequently derailed.''
FRA also explained what we could do if the emergency situation did
not abate. That is, in the Safety Advisory, FRA stated that we would
consider ``the need for any additional action to address this
situation, such as regulatory action or additional advisories. We are
considering the form that any additional action might take, its
specific content, and any necessary variations based on differing types
of operations * * *. We are committed to taking whatever action appears
necessary to prevent any further death or serious injury that might
arise from additional failures to comply with the basic operating rules
concerning the proper positioning of main track switches.''
FRA's decision to make recommendations was based in part on the
fact that several railroads had already initiated voluntary actions to
enhance the applicable railroad operating rules during the last few
months of 2004. FRA wanted to give all railroads the same opportunity
to self-correct in the expectation that it would suffice to ameliorate
this problem until, as discussed below, a rule could be issued.
Furthermore, the purpose of the Safety Advisory was to heighten
employee awareness of the importance of restoring main track switches
to their normal position in non-signaled territory. A key element of
the Safety Advisory was to promote and enhance intra-crew communication
about the operation and position of main track switches.
With the exception of a similar accident that occurred on CSX
Transportation (CSX) in Banks, Alabama, on January 11, 2005, one day
after publication of the Safety Advisory, and an accident, with
relatively minor results, that was caused by an employee of a
contractor to the Nashville and Eastern Railroad (NERR), in Mt. Juliet,
Tennessee on February 23, 2005, there was a respite of nearly six
months in accidents resulting from improperly lined main track switches
in non-signaled territory. During this respite, FRA began a rulemaking
on this subject and other human factor causes of accidents. For about
the last decade, FRA has sought recommendations from its standing
Federal advisory committee on most of the subjects on which FRA
proposed to issue substantive safety rules. In FRA's view, this process
produces better rules because it generates more substantive
participation in rulemakings from experts representing both management
and labor, and yields better and faster compliance with the final rule
from the regulated community which helped craft it. On May 18, 2005, at
the first opportunity to address this subject, the Railroad Safety
Advisory Committee (RSAC or Committee) agreed to take up the task of
reviewing how to reduce human factor caused train accidents/incidents
and related employee injuries. The full Committee formed a smaller
[[Page 61498]]
Operating Rules Working Group (Working Group) comprised of people
expert in this subject to do the bulk of the work in formulating
recommendations to complete the task, and a target date of February 10,
2006, was established for the Working Group to report its findings and
recommendations back to the full RSAC.
Since May, the Working Group has met twice and progress toward a
consensus recommendation has been made. One of the key elements in
those discussions is the proper operation of main track switches in
non-signaled territory. Through the Working Group's activities, FRA has
already heard comments on this issue from organizations representing
every affected party within the industry. The Working Group has three
additional meetings scheduled in order to meet the February deadline
for recommendations. FRA's goal is to publish a proposed rule in 2006,
and a final rule soon thereafter.
Working with a Federal advisory committee to generate consensus
recommendations takes many meetings over a number of months, and
rulemaking can take many more months. During the time it takes to
accomplish these tasks, new accidents can occur that require more
immediate action. That has happened here. After six months, the Safety
Advisory no longer worked well enough to prevent more accidents.
First, in July 2005, two accidents, with relatively minor results
occurred. As the results were minor, and, FRA believed awareness was
heightened due to the publication of the Safety Advisory and the RSAC's
activities, FRA did not identify an emergency situation in July. The
following is a synopsis of those two accidents.
July 7, 2005--Willamette & Pacific Railroad (WPRR),
Sheridan, Oregon--a maintenance of way work train was parked in a
siding and the switch was left lined for the siding. A local freight
train, operating at a speed of 12 miles per hour (mph), was
unintentionally diverted into the siding due to an improperly lined
switch. The freight train struck the lead locomotive of the standing
work train. Both locomotives derailed.
July 9, 2005--Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad
(DME), Florence, Minnesota--the crew of an eastward BNSF light
locomotive consist departing DME property and returning to BNSF
trackage, failed to restore the junction switch to its normal position.
Subsequently, an eastward DME train, operating at a speed of 38 mph,
encountered an improperly lined switch. As a result, the lead
locomotive derailed and was destroyed.
Beginning six weeks later, three more accidents occurred with more
serious results. The three recent accidents described below occurred
over a 28-day period and clearly demonstrate the need for additional
action beyond the Safety Advisory, as these three collisions, overall,
resulted in fatal injuries to one railroad employee, non-fatal injuries
to eight additional railroad employees, an evacuation of civilians, and
railroad property damage of approximately two million dollars.
Furthermore, each of these accidents could have been worse, as each had
the potential for additional deaths, injuries, property damage or
environmental damage. Two of the accidents could have involved
catastrophic releases of hazardous materials as these materials were
present in at least one of the train consists that collided.
August 19, 2005--Kansas & Oklahoma Railroad (KO),
Nickerson, Kansas--an eastward loaded grain train was operating at a
speed of 26 mph when it encountered an improperly lined switch at the
west end of the siding. The train struck a standing cut of cars,
resulting in the derailment of two locomotives and two freight cars.
The locomotive engineer was severely injured.
August 21, 2005--Union Pacific Railroad (UP), Heber,
California--an eastward freight train operating at a speed of 30 mph
encountered an improperly lined switch at the west end of a siding. The
train struck a standing cut of cars, resulting in the derailment of two
locomotives and two freight cars. The control compartment on the lead
locomotive was completely destroyed. The three crewmembers survived
only by quickly throwing themselves on the floor of the locomotive
immediately before impact. Considering the destruction to the
locomotive control compartment, the crewmembers likely would have been
seriously injured or killed, but for their quick action. The locomotive
engineer, conductor and trainman were taken to a local hospital where
they were treated and released.
September 15, 2005--UP, Shepherd, Texas--a southward
freight train operating at a speed of 36 mph, collided head-on with a
northward UP freight train that was standing in a siding. The collision
occurred when the southward train encountered an improperly lined
switch at the north end of the siding. The southward train struck the
standing train and derailed two locomotives and 13 cars. The two
locomotives and the four leading cars of the standing train were also
derailed. The engineer of the standing train was fatally injured and
four other crewmembers were injured. Eleven of the 13 cars contained
hazardous materials. Although, no hazardous materials release occurred,
a precautionary evacuation of 500 people was ordered by local
authorities for a period of 12 hours.
Each of the accidents that precipitated the Safety Advisory and
this EO either resulted in, or had the potential to result in, serious
injuries, fatalities, and catastrophic releases of hazardous materials.
As previously stated, the industry achieved only a temporary respite
from accidents of this type after the Safety Advisory's publication,
instead of the long-term solution that FRA expected. The sudden and
recent occurrence of five of this type of accident is a clear
indication that the Safety Advisory has lost its effectiveness. Only
with additional action can FRA secure compliance with these important
railroad operating rules. FRA considered issuing another Safety
Advisory, but that might at best only provide another temporary pause.
As described above, FRA is currently seeking a permanent solution
through rulemaking. The issuance of this EO is intended to accomplish
what the Safety Advisory could not: Implement safety practices that
will abate the emergency until FRA can complete rulemaking after
receiving the RSAC's expert advice.
Finding and Order: Collisions, deaths and injuries resulting from
improperly lined main track switches began in 2004 to rise very sharply
as shown on the attached charts. FRA's issuance of a Safety Advisory in
early January 2005, recommending practices designed to prevent such
events, led to a nearly six month respite. The sharply rising and
accelerating trend of collisions, deaths and injuries resulting from
improperly lined main track switches, which the Safety Advisory abated
only temporarily, constitutes an emergency situation involving a hazard
of death or personal injury which FRA must act to stop.
Even considering the nearly six-month respite from January 12
through July 6, the Nation has experienced more accidents resulting
from improperly lined hand-operated switches on main track in non-
signaled territory than it experienced in any of the previous five
years. To date in 2005, there were nine accidents resulting in 640
injuries and 10 fatalities. Given the cloud of chlorine that covered
much of Graniteville, South Carolina, on January 6, 2005, as a result
of one of these accidents, it is fortuitous that the death toll is not
[[Page 61499]]
significantly higher; in addition, the same could be said for the
Nickerson, Kansas and Shepherd, Texas accidents that occurred on August
19, 2005 and September 15, 2005 respectively as trains involved in
those accidents were transporting tank cars containing hazardous
materials. Any reasonable extrapolation of the current trends of
wrecks, deaths, and injuries makes clear that more accidents of this
type will occur in the absence of this EO, that many of those accidents
will result in injuries or deaths, or both, that a significant
percentage of those wrecks will involve trains carrying hazardous
materials, and that each of those wrecks will pose a significant risk
that a large amount of hazardous material will be released. Considering
the severity of accidents related to improperly lined hand-operated
main track switches in non-signaled territory, the prevalence of
hazardous materials on trains in non-signaled territory, and the recent
and dramatic increase in the rate of occurrence of these accidents,
decisive action is necessary now.
FRA concludes that non-compliance with certain operating rules and
practices on the Nation's railroads concerning the proper positioning
of hand-operated main track switches in non-signaled territory lacking
the safeguards of facing point protection is a combination of unsafe
conditions and practices which causes an emergency situation involving
an imminent and unacceptable hazard of death or personal injury. FRA
further concludes that reliance solely on employee compliance with
railroad operating rules related to the operation of hand-operated main
track switches in non-signaled territory, without a Federal enforcement
mechanism, is inadequate to protect the public safety.
FRA also considered whether to apply this EO nationwide or limit it
to those railroads that have had recent accidents. A review of the 2005
accidents reveals that four major railroads and four other, smaller
railroads were involved in accidents. On June 12, 2004, an alert Amtrak
engineer made a full service application of the train brake and stopped
three car lengths into a siding, thereby avoiding a potentially serious
accident on CSX track in Apex, North Carolina. Going back to 2000, five
additional smaller railroads were involved in accidents. Over the last
six years, 41% of this type of accident has had at least one train
consist involved that was carrying hazardous material, i.e., 11 out of
27 accidents. Given the wide distribution of the accidents across
various railroads, the similarity of physical conditions and operating
practices among railroads of all sizes nationwide, the high number of
new and inexperienced operating employees on many railroads, and the
very high potential for serious harm, limiting the EO's effectiveness
to only a small number of railroads would be an unjustifiable risk to
public safety and the safety of railroad employees.
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority of 49 U.S.C. 20104,
delegated to me by the Secretary of Transportation (49 CFR 1.49), it is
hereby ordered that each railroad and its employees, including
employees of a contractor to a railroad, who operate hand-operated main
track switches in non-signaled territory and who dispatch non-signaled
territory, do, at a minimum, the following:
(1) Instruction
Each employee subject to this EO shall be instructed on this EO and
the railroad's operating rules relating to the operation of hand-
operated main track switches in non-signaled territory. The subject
matter of the instruction shall include, but not be limited to:
Operation of main track switches;
Position of main track switches;
Restoring main track switches to their normal position;
Securing (locking) main track switches;
Correspondence of switch targets to switch position;
Clearing limits of main track authority;
Job briefings; and
Switch Position Awareness Form (SPAF).
After receiving initial instruction, all employees must receive
periodic instruction, in accordance with 49 CFR 217.11. Railroads shall
maintain records of both initial and periodic instruction available for
inspection and copying by representatives of the FRA during normal
business hours. These records shall be maintained for a period of at
least two years following the end of the calendar year during which the
instruction was conducted.
(2) Hand-Operated Main Track Switches
Employees operating hand-operated main track switches in non-
signaled territory shall be qualified on the railroad's operating rules
relating to their operation. No employee is permitted to operate or
verify the position of a hand-operated main track switch in non-
signaled territory unless that person is qualified on the railroad's
operating rules relating to their operation.
Employees operating hand-operated main track switches in non-
signaled territory are individually responsible for the proper
operation of these switches, including restoration to their normal
position after use. Employees operating hand-operated main track
switches in non-signaled territory must visually ensure that:
Hand-operated main track switches are properly lined for
the intended route; and
The switch points fit properly and the switch target, if
so equipped, corresponds with the switch's position.
The normal position of a main track switch shall be designated by
the railroad and the switch must be lined and locked in that position
when not in use, except when the switch is left in the charge of a
crewmember of another train or the train dispatcher directs otherwise.
When switches are not being operated, they must be locked, hooked or
latched if so equipped.
Before releasing the limits of a main track authority, the employee
releasing the limits must report to the train dispatcher that all hand-
operated main track switches operated have been restored to their
normal position, unless the train dispatcher directs otherwise. The
train dispatcher must confirm the switch positions with the employee
releasing the limits before clearing the limits of the authority.
Additionally, in the case of a train, the train dispatcher must confirm
that both the conductor and engineer have initialed the SPAF as
required.
(3) Switch Position Awareness Form (SPAF)
Employees operating hand-operated main track switches in non-
signaled territory shall complete a SPAF. Employees are individually
responsible for the proper completion of these forms. The form must
contain:
Train symbol, job number or other unique identifier;
Date;
Subdivision;
Employee's name; in the case of a train, both the
Engineer's and Conductor's names;
Name and location of each main track switch operated by
any employee;
Time switch was initially reversed;
Time switch was finally returned to the normal position;
Initials of the employee handling the switch;
Engineer's initials for each entry; and
Conductor's signature when the form is completed.
Entries made with respect to a specific hand-operated main track
switch in non-signaled territory must be recorded as soon as
practicable after the
[[Page 61500]]
switch is reversed, and as soon as practicable after the switch is
returned to its normal position before leaving the location. All
information required on the SPAF must be entered before an employee
reports clear of the limits of the main track authority. SPAFs shall be
retained for a period of five days and made available to
representatives of the FRA for inspection and copying.
(4) Job Briefings
Job briefings shall be conducted by employees in connection with
the operation of hand-operated main track switches in non-signaled
territory:
Before work is begun;
Each time a work plan is changed; and
At completion of the work.
(5) Radio Communication
In the case of a train, each time a crewmember operates, i.e.,
changes the position of, a hand-operated main track switch in non-
signaled territory, the crewmember shall communicate with the engineer
by radio while physically at the switch location, stating the switch
name and location, and the position of the switch (normal/reverse).
Before movement may occur, the engineer must acknowledge that
information by radio.
If radios become inoperable, all crewmembers must conduct a job
briefing regarding the use of hand-operated main track switches in non-
signaled territory before use, noting the inoperable radio on the SPAF.
(6) Operational Tests and Inspections
The railroad's program of operational tests and inspections under
49 CFR part 217 shall be revised as necessary to include the
requirements of this EO, and shall specifically provide for a minimum
number of such tests per year.
(7) Distribution of Emergency Order
A copy of this EO shall be provided to all employees affected by
this EO. A written receipt or acknowledgment must be retained
permanently for each affected employee.
Relief: Petitions for special approval to take actions not in
accordance with this EO may be submitted to the Associate Administrator
for Safety, who shall be authorized to dispose of those requests
without the necessity of amending this EO. In reviewing any petition
for special review, the Associate Administrator for Safety shall only
grant petitions in which a petitioner has clearly articulated an
alternative action that will provide, in the Associate Administrator
for Safety's judgment, at least an equivalent level of safety as this
EO provides. A copy of this petition should be submitted to the Docket
Clerk, Department of Transportation Central Docket Management System,
Nassif Building, Room Pl-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC
20590. The form of such request may be in written or electronic form
consistent with the standards and requirements established by the
Central Docket Management System and posted on its Web site at https://
dms.dot.gov.
FRA recognizes that certain railroad operating rules or equipment
used by some railroads already provide a level of safety equivalent to
this EO. If all of a railroad's hand-operated main track switches in
non-signaled territory are covered by one or more of the protective
measures identified below, a railroad need not apply for relief from
this EO as relief shall be deemed automatically granted. Relief from
this EO is automatically granted when:
Operating rules require trains to approach all facing
point hand-operated switches in non-signaled territory prepared to
stop;
Hand-operated main track switches in non-signaled
territory (unless out of service) are protected by distant switch
indicators; or
Hand-operated main track switches in non-signaled
territory are protected by switch point indicators, e.g., BNSF's
automatic switches and CSX's self restoring switches, unless these
switches are operated by hand.
Penalties: Any violation of this EO shall subject the person
committing the violation to a civil penalty of up to $27,000. 49 U.S.C.
21301, 28 U.S.C. 2461, and see 69 FR 30591 (May 28, 2004). ``Person''
is defined by statute to include corporations, companies, associations,
firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as
individuals. 1 U.S.C. 1. FRA may, through the Attorney General, also
seek injunctive relief to enforce this EO. 49 U.S.C. 20112.
Effective Date and Notice to Affected Persons: Upon issuance of
this EO, railroads shall immediately initiate steps to implement this
EO. Railroads shall complete implementation no later than November 22,
2005. Notice of this EO will be provided by publishing it in the
Federal Register.
Review: Opportunity for review of this EO will be provided in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 20104(b) and section 554 of Title 5 of the
United States Code. Administrative procedures governing such review are
found at 49 CFR part 211. See 49 CFR 211.47, 211.71, 211.73, 211.75,
and 211.77.
Issued in Washington, DC on October 19, 2005.
Joseph H. Boardman,
Administrator.
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
[[Page 61501]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24OC05.000
[[Page 61502]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24OC05.001
[[Page 61503]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24OC05.002
[[Page 61504]]
[FR Doc. 05-21253 Filed 10-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-C