Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Connecticut; VOC RACT Orders for Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.; and Ross & Roberts, Inc., 61384-61388 [05-21194]
Download as PDF
61384
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by December 23,
2005. Interested parties should
comment in response to the proposed
rule rather than petition for judicial
review, unless the objection arises after
the comment period allowed for in the
proposal. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 28, 2005.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart U—Maine
2. Section 52.1020 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(57) to read as
follows:
I
§ 52.1020
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(57) Revisions to the State
Implementation Plan submitted by the
Maine Department of Environmental
Protection on August 27, 2004, and
September 8, 2004.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 152 of the Maine
Department of Environmental Protection
Regulations, ‘‘Control of Emissions of
Volatile Organic Compounds from
Consumer Products,’’ effective in the
State of Maine on September 1, 2004.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the
submittal.
I 3. In § 52.1031, Table 52.1031 is
amended by adding a new State citation,
152, to read as follows:
§ 52.1031 EPA-approved Maine
Regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 52.1031.—EPA-APPROVED RULES AND REGULATIONS
State
citation
Title/subject
*
152 ..............
*
*
Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer Products
*
Date adopted
by State
*
Date approved
by EPA
*
8/19/04
*
10/24/05
*
Federal Register
citation
*
[Insert FR citation
from published
date]
52.1020
*
*
*
*
(c)(57).
*
Note.—1. The regulations are effective statewide unless stated otherwise in comments section.
[FR Doc. 05–21192 Filed 10–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R01–OAR–2005–CT–0002; A–1–FRL–7967–
2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Connecticut; VOC RACT Orders for
Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly
Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.;
and Ross & Roberts, Inc.
SUMMARY: EPA is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Connecticut.
These revisions incorporate volatile
organic compound (VOC) reasonably
available control technology (RACT)
state consent orders into the
Connecticut SIP for four facilities:
Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly
Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.;
and Ross & Roberts, Inc. This action will
have a beneficial effect on air quality by
reducing VOC emissions which
contribute to ground-level ozone
formation. EPA is taking this action in
accordance with the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
This direct final rule will be
effective December 23, 2005, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by
November 23, 2005. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will
DATES:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Direct final rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:23 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R01–OAR–
2005–CT–0002 by one of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional
Material in EDocket (RME), EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key
in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the on-
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
line instructions for submitting
comments.
3. E-mail: conroy.dave@epa.gov.
4. Fax: (617) 918–0661.
5. Mail: ‘‘RME ID Number R01–OAR–
2005–CT–0002,’’ David Conroy, Chief,
Air Programs Branch, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, One
Congress Street, Suite 1100 (mail code
CAQ), Boston, MA 02114–2023.
6. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to: David Conroy, Chief,
Air Programs Branch, Office of
Ecosystem Protection, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, One
Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAQ),
Boston, MA 02114–2023. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID
Number R01–OAR–2005–CT–0002.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through Regional
Material in EDocket (RME),
regulations.gov, or e-mail, information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected. The EPA RME Web site and
the federal regulations.gov Web site are
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through RME or
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:23 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
Regional Material in EDocket (RME)
index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in hard copy at the Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street,
Suite 1100, Boston, MA. EPA requests
that if at all possible, you contact the
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alison C. Simcox, Air Quality Planning
Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA New England Regional
Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100
(CAQ), Boston, MA 02114–2023,
telephone number (617) 918–1684, fax
number (617) 918–0684, e-mail
simcox.alison@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. How Can I Get Copies of This
Document and Other Related
Information?
In addition to the publicly available
docket materials available for inspection
electronically in Regional Material in
EDocket, and the hard copy available at
the Regional Office, which are identified
in the ADDRESSES section above, copies
of the state submittal and EPA’s
technical support document are also
available for public inspection during
normal business hours, by appointment
at the State Air Agency. [The Bureau of
Air Management, Department of
Environmental Protection, State Office
Building, 79 Elm Street, Hartford, CT
06106–1630.]
II. Rulemaking Information
Organization of this document. The
following outline is provided to aid in
locating information in this preamble.
A. What action is EPA taking?
B. What are the requirements in the
Connecticut orders?
C. Why is EPA approving Connecticut’s
submittals?
D. What is the process for approving these
SIP revisions?
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61385
A. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving VOC RACT state
consent orders issued to the following
facilities and incorporating these orders
into the Connecticut SIP: Hitchcock
Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly Clark Corp.;
Watson Laboratories, Inc. (formerly
Danbury Pharmacal); and Ross &
Roberts, Inc.
B. What are the requirements in the
Connecticut orders?
Consent Order 8229A for the
Hitchcock Chair Company requires the
wood-furniture manufacturing facility to
meet VOC emission limits, work
practice standards, and recordkeeping
and reporting requirements. The
requirements of the order are consistent
with EPA’s Control Techniques
Guideline (CTG) for wood furniture
manufacturers.1 Specifically, the order
contains VOC content limits for topcoats
and sealers and for spray-booth
cleaning. Work practice standards
include requirements to develop a
written leak inspection and
maintenance plan and to conduct
training for facility personnel. In
addition, the requirements prohibit use
of conventional air-spray guns except
under specified limited conditions.
Recordkeeping and reporting
requirements include requirements to
maintain records of VOC content and
viscosity of topcoats and sealers and of
solvent additions, and to submit
semiannual compliance reports and
compliance certifications to DEP.
Consent Order 8190 for the Kimberly
Clark Corporation requires the tissue
and healthcare-products manufacturing
facility to meet VOC emission limits,
monitoring requirements, and
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements. Specifically, the order
contains VOC emissions limits for the
tissue-manufacturing machines and the
wastewater-treatment process. The
facility is required to continue to
research and test low VOC-content
additives for its manufacturing process,
and to submit a biennial report to DEP
that summarizes research activities and
evaluates the feasibility of switching to
lower VOC content additives. In
addition, Kimberly Clark must submit
annual compliance reports and
compliance certifications to DEP.
Consent Order 8200 for Watson
Laboratories, Inc., requires the
pharmaceutical company to meet VOC
emission limits, monitoring
requirements, and recordkeeping and
reporting requirements. Specifically, the
1 ‘‘Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing
Operations,’’ EPA–453/R–96–007, April 1996.
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
61386
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
facility has reformulated some of its
coatings and the order requires the
facility to continue to use non-VOC
coatings and materials when
manufacturing several specified
products. The order also contains
monthly and annual VOC emissions
caps and prohibits the facility from
using methylene chloride and methanol
in the existing process equipment and
cleaning of this equipment. Also, the
company is required to continue to
research the availability of U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA)
approved non-VOC coatings and
materials for any new product produced
at the facility. In addition, the facility
must maintain records that include a list
of coatings and materials used to
manufacture specified products, and the
amount and method of usage of
methylene chloride and methanol.
Watson Laboratories must submit
annual compliance reports and
compliance certifications to DEP.
Consent Order 8237 for Ross &
Roberts, Inc. requires the vinyl-sheet
products manufacturing business to
meet VOC emission limits, monitoring
requirements, and recordkeeping and
reporting requirements. Specifically, the
order includes a limit on the average
monthly VOC emissions generated from
the facility’s calendar lines. Also, the
facility is required to continue to use its
fiberbed emission control (FEC) system
(or DEP- and EPA-approved
replacement system) to limit VOC
emissions from the calender lines, and
to monitor the performance of the FEC
system (or its replacement). The facility
also must conduct emissions testing,
and submit testing results to DEP. In
addition, the facility must maintain
records that include the weight of
material produced in the calender lines,
results of VOC emission testing, FEC
system performance, and operating time
for the calendar equipment and capture
and control devices. Watson Labs must
submit annual compliance reports and
compliance certifications to DEP.
C. Why is EPA approving Connecticut’s
submittals?
EPA has evaluated the orders issued
to Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly
Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.;
and Ross & Roberts, Inc., and has found
that they are generally consistent with
EPA guidance and impose VOC RACT at
these facilities. Therefore, EPA is
approving these orders as VOC RACT.
The specific requirements of these
orders and EPA’s evaluation of these
requirements are detailed in a
memorandum entitled ‘‘Technical
Support Document—Connecticut—VOC
RACT Orders’’ (TSD). The TSD and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:23 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
Connecticut’s orders are available in the
docket supporting this action.
Previously, Connecticut submitted to
EPA Section 22a–174–32 ‘‘Reasonably
Available Control Technology (RACT)
for volatile organic compounds.’’ EPA
issued an approval of this rule on
October 19, 2000 (65 FR 62620). EPA’s
approval noted that Connecticut must
define explicitly, and have approved by
EPA, RACT for all those sources
complying with Section 22a–174–32
through options (C) and (D) of the rule.
Therefore, the DEP subsequently
submitted SIP revisions to EPA for
Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly
Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.;
and Ross & Roberts, Inc.
D. What is the process for approving
these SIP revisions?
The EPA is publishing this action
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register
publication, EPA is publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision
should relevant adverse comments be
filed. This rule will be effective
December 23, 2005, without further
notice unless the Agency receives
relevant adverse comments by
November 23, 2005.
If the EPA receives such comments,
then EPA will publish a notice
withdrawing the final rule and
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on
the proposed rule. Only parties
interested in commenting on the
proposed rule should do so at this time.
If no such comments are received, the
public is advised that this rule will be
effective on December 23, 2005 and no
further action will be taken on the
proposed rule. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving VOC RACT orders
issued to the following facilities and
incorporating these orders into the
Connecticut SIP: Hitchcock Chair Co.,
Ltd.; Kimberly Clark Corp.; Watson
Laboratories, Inc. (formerly Danbury
Pharmacal); and Ross & Roberts, Inc.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
approves a state rule implementing a
federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
61387
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by December 23,
2005. Interested parties should
comment in response to the proposed
rule rather than petition for judicial
review, unless the objection arises after
the comment period allowed for in the
proposal. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: August 11, 2005.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
§ 52.370
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(96) Revisions to the State
Implementation Plan submitted by the
Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection on April 30,
2002, and October 17, 2002.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Consent Order No. 8229A issued
by the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection to Hitchcock
Chair Company, Ltd., on April 15, 2002.
(B) Consent Order No. 8190 issued by
the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection to Kimberly
Clark Corporation on April 23, 2002.
(C) Consent Order No. 8200 issued by
the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection to Watson
Laboratories, Inc., on October 3, 2002.
(D) Consent Order No. 8237 issued by
the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection to Ross &
Roberts, Inc., on October 4, 2002.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the
submittal.
3. In § 52.385, Table 52.385 is
amended by adding new entries to
existing state citation 22a–174–32 to
read as follows:
I
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart H—Connecticut
§ 52.385 EPA-approved Connecticut
regulations.
2. Section 52.370 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(96) to read as
follows:
I
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 52.385.—EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS
Dates
Connecticut
State
citation
*
22a–174–32
22a–174–32
22a–174–32
22a–174–32
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Title/subject
*
Reasonably available
control technology for
volatile organic compounds.
Reasonably available
control technology for
volatile organic compounds.
Reasonably available
control technology for
volatile organic compounds.
Reasonably available
control technology for
volatile organic compounds.
*
13:23 Oct 21, 2005
Federal Register
citation
Date
approved by
EPA
*
4/15/02
10/24/05
*
*
[Insert FR citation from
published date].
(c)(96)
*
*
VOC RACT for Hitchcock Chair.
4/23/01
10/24/05
[Insert FR citation from
published date].
(c)(96)
VOC RACT for Kimberly Clark.
10/03/02
10/24/05
[Insert FR citation from
published date].
(c)(96)
VOC RACT for Watson Laboratories.
10/04/02
10/24/05
[Insert FR citation from
published date].
(c)(96)
VOC RACT for Ross & Roberts.
*
Jkt 208001
Section
52.370
Date adopted by State
PO 00000
*
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Comments/description
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
*
24OCR1
*
61388
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
[FR Doc. 05–21194 Filed 10–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 64
[Docket No. FEMA–7897]
Suspension of Community Eligibility
Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA),
Emergency Preparedness and Response
Directorate, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule identifies
communities, where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under
the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP), that are scheduled for
suspension on the effective dates listed
within this rule because of
noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the
program. If FEMA receives
documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain
management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this
rule, the suspension will not occur and
a notice of this will be provided by
publication in the Federal Register on a
subsequent date.
EFFECTIVE DATES: The effective date of
each community’s scheduled
suspension is the third date (‘‘Susp.’’)
listed in the third column of the
following tables.
ADDRESSES: If you want to determine
whether a particular community was
suspended on the suspension date,
contact the appropriate FEMA Regional
Office or the NFIP servicing contractor.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael M. Grimm, Mitigation Division,
500 C Street, SW., Room 412,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2878.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP
enables property owners to purchase
flood insurance which is generally not
otherwise available. In return,
communities agree to adopt and
administer local floodplain management
aimed at protecting lives and new
construction from future flooding.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:23 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
Section 1315 of the National Flood
Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance
coverage as authorized under the NFIP,
42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; unless an
appropriate public body adopts
adequate floodplain management
measures with effective enforcement
measures. The communities listed in
this document no longer meet that
statutory requirement for compliance
with program regulations, 44 CFR part
59 et seq. Accordingly, the communities
will be suspended on the effective date
in the third column. As of that date,
flood insurance will no longer be
available in the community. However,
some of these communities may adopt
and submit the required documentation
of legally enforceable floodplain
management measures after this rule is
published but prior to the actual
suspension date. These communities
will not be suspended and will continue
their eligibility for the sale of insurance.
A notice withdrawing the suspension of
the communities will be published in
the Federal Register.
In addition, FEMA has identified the
Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) in
these communities by publishing a
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The
date of the FIRM, if one has been
published, is indicated in the fourth
column of the table. No direct Federal
financial assistance (except assistance
pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act not in connection with a
flood) may legally be provided for
construction or acquisition of buildings
in identified SFHAs for communities
not participating in the NFIP and
identified for more than a year, on
FEMA’s initial flood insurance map of
the community as having flood-prone
areas (section 202(a) of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42
U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This
prohibition against certain types of
Federal assistance becomes effective for
the communities listed on the date
shown in the last column. The
Administrator finds that notice and
public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)
are impracticable and unnecessary
because communities listed in this final
rule have been adequately notified.
Each community receives 6-month,
90-day, and 30-day notification letters
addressed to the Chief Executive Officer
stating that the community will be
suspended unless the required
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
floodplain management measures are
met prior to the effective suspension
date. Since these notifications were
made, this final rule may take effect
within less than 30 days.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule is categorically excluded
from the requirements of 44 CFR Part
10, Environmental Considerations. No
environmental impact assessment has
been prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Administrator has determined
that this rule is exempt from the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act because the National
Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, prohibits
flood insurance coverage unless an
appropriate public body adopts
adequate floodplain management
measures with effective enforcement
measures. The communities listed no
longer comply with the statutory
requirements, and after the effective
date, flood insurance will no longer be
available in the communities unless
remedial action takes place.
Regulatory Classification
This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993, Regulatory
Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not involve any
collection of information for purposes of
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64
Flood insurance, Floodplains.
Accordingly, 44 CFR Part 64 is
amended as follows:
I
PART 64—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 64
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
3 CFR, 1979 Comp.; p. 376.
§ 64.6
[Amended]
The tables published under the
authority of § 64.6 are amended as
follows:
I
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 204 (Monday, October 24, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61384-61388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21194]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R01-OAR-2005-CT-0002; A-1-FRL-7967-2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Connecticut; VOC RACT Orders for Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly
Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.; and Ross & Roberts, Inc.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Connecticut. These revisions incorporate
volatile organic compound (VOC) reasonably available control technology
(RACT) state consent orders into the Connecticut SIP for four
facilities: Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly Clark Corp.; Watson
Laboratories, Inc.; and Ross & Roberts, Inc. This action will have a
beneficial effect on air quality by reducing VOC emissions which
contribute to ground-level ozone formation. EPA is taking this action
in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective December 23, 2005,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by November 23, 2005. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R01-OAR-2005-CT-0002 by one of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
2. Agency Web site: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional Material
in EDocket (RME), EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is
EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system,
select ``quick search,'' then key in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the on-
[[Page 61385]]
line instructions for submitting comments.
3. E-mail: conroy.dave@epa.gov.
4. Fax: (617) 918-0661.
5. Mail: ``RME ID Number R01-OAR-2005-CT-0002,'' David Conroy,
Chief, Air Programs Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (mail code
CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023.
6. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: David
Conroy, Chief, Air Programs Branch, Office of Ecosystem Protection,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office,
One Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Regional Material in EDocket
(RME) ID Number R01-OAR-2005-CT-0002. EPA's policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public docket without change and may
be made available online at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including
any personal information provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not
submit through Regional Material in EDocket (RME), regulations.gov, or
e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The EPA RME Web site and the federal regulations.gov Web site are
``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
Regional Material in EDocket (RME) index at https://docket.epa.gov/
rmepub/. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or in hard copy at the Office of
Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New
England Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA.
EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alison C. Simcox, Air Quality Planning
Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional
Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023,
telephone number (617) 918-1684, fax number (617) 918-0684, e-mail
simcox.alison@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information?
In addition to the publicly available docket materials available
for inspection electronically in Regional Material in EDocket, and the
hard copy available at the Regional Office, which are identified in the
ADDRESSES section above, copies of the state submittal and EPA's
technical support document are also available for public inspection
during normal business hours, by appointment at the State Air Agency.
[The Bureau of Air Management, Department of Environmental Protection,
State Office Building, 79 Elm Street, Hartford, CT 06106-1630.]
II. Rulemaking Information
Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to
aid in locating information in this preamble.
A. What action is EPA taking?
B. What are the requirements in the Connecticut orders?
C. Why is EPA approving Connecticut's submittals?
D. What is the process for approving these SIP revisions?
A. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving VOC RACT state consent orders issued to the
following facilities and incorporating these orders into the
Connecticut SIP: Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly Clark Corp.;
Watson Laboratories, Inc. (formerly Danbury Pharmacal); and Ross &
Roberts, Inc.
B. What are the requirements in the Connecticut orders?
Consent Order 8229A for the Hitchcock Chair Company requires the
wood-furniture manufacturing facility to meet VOC emission limits, work
practice standards, and recordkeeping and reporting requirements. The
requirements of the order are consistent with EPA's Control Techniques
Guideline (CTG) for wood furniture manufacturers.\1\ Specifically, the
order contains VOC content limits for topcoats and sealers and for
spray-booth cleaning. Work practice standards include requirements to
develop a written leak inspection and maintenance plan and to conduct
training for facility personnel. In addition, the requirements prohibit
use of conventional air-spray guns except under specified limited
conditions. Recordkeeping and reporting requirements include
requirements to maintain records of VOC content and viscosity of
topcoats and sealers and of solvent additions, and to submit semiannual
compliance reports and compliance certifications to DEP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wood
Furniture Manufacturing Operations,'' EPA-453/R-96-007, April 1996.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consent Order 8190 for the Kimberly Clark Corporation requires the
tissue and healthcare-products manufacturing facility to meet VOC
emission limits, monitoring requirements, and recordkeeping and
reporting requirements. Specifically, the order contains VOC emissions
limits for the tissue-manufacturing machines and the wastewater-
treatment process. The facility is required to continue to research and
test low VOC-content additives for its manufacturing process, and to
submit a biennial report to DEP that summarizes research activities and
evaluates the feasibility of switching to lower VOC content additives.
In addition, Kimberly Clark must submit annual compliance reports and
compliance certifications to DEP.
Consent Order 8200 for Watson Laboratories, Inc., requires the
pharmaceutical company to meet VOC emission limits, monitoring
requirements, and recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Specifically, the
[[Page 61386]]
facility has reformulated some of its coatings and the order requires
the facility to continue to use non-VOC coatings and materials when
manufacturing several specified products. The order also contains
monthly and annual VOC emissions caps and prohibits the facility from
using methylene chloride and methanol in the existing process equipment
and cleaning of this equipment. Also, the company is required to
continue to research the availability of U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) approved non-VOC coatings and materials for any
new product produced at the facility. In addition, the facility must
maintain records that include a list of coatings and materials used to
manufacture specified products, and the amount and method of usage of
methylene chloride and methanol. Watson Laboratories must submit annual
compliance reports and compliance certifications to DEP.
Consent Order 8237 for Ross & Roberts, Inc. requires the vinyl-
sheet products manufacturing business to meet VOC emission limits,
monitoring requirements, and recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Specifically, the order includes a limit on the average monthly VOC
emissions generated from the facility's calendar lines. Also, the
facility is required to continue to use its fiberbed emission control
(FEC) system (or DEP- and EPA-approved replacement system) to limit VOC
emissions from the calender lines, and to monitor the performance of
the FEC system (or its replacement). The facility also must conduct
emissions testing, and submit testing results to DEP. In addition, the
facility must maintain records that include the weight of material
produced in the calender lines, results of VOC emission testing, FEC
system performance, and operating time for the calendar equipment and
capture and control devices. Watson Labs must submit annual compliance
reports and compliance certifications to DEP.
C. Why is EPA approving Connecticut's submittals?
EPA has evaluated the orders issued to Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.;
Kimberly Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.; and Ross & Roberts,
Inc., and has found that they are generally consistent with EPA
guidance and impose VOC RACT at these facilities. Therefore, EPA is
approving these orders as VOC RACT.
The specific requirements of these orders and EPA's evaluation of
these requirements are detailed in a memorandum entitled ``Technical
Support Document--Connecticut--VOC RACT Orders'' (TSD). The TSD and
Connecticut's orders are available in the docket supporting this
action.
Previously, Connecticut submitted to EPA Section 22a-174-32
``Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for volatile organic
compounds.'' EPA issued an approval of this rule on October 19, 2000
(65 FR 62620). EPA's approval noted that Connecticut must define
explicitly, and have approved by EPA, RACT for all those sources
complying with Section 22a-174-32 through options (C) and (D) of the
rule. Therefore, the DEP subsequently submitted SIP revisions to EPA
for Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly Clark Corp.; Watson
Laboratories, Inc.; and Ross & Roberts, Inc.
D. What is the process for approving these SIP revisions?
The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates
no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
relevant adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective
December 23, 2005, without further notice unless the Agency receives
relevant adverse comments by November 23, 2005.
If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on the proposed rule. Only parties
interested in commenting on the proposed rule should do so at this
time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this
rule will be effective on December 23, 2005 and no further action will
be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving VOC RACT orders issued to the following facilities
and incorporating these orders into the Connecticut SIP: Hitchcock
Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.
(formerly Danbury Pharmacal); and Ross & Roberts, Inc.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely approves a state rule
implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus
[[Page 61387]]
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission
for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable
law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a
SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air
Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 23, 2005. Interested
parties should comment in response to the proposed rule rather than
petition for judicial review, unless the objection arises after the
comment period allowed for in the proposal. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 11, 2005.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
0
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart H--Connecticut
0
2. Section 52.370 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(96) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.370 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(96) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the
Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection on April 30, 2002,
and October 17, 2002.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Consent Order No. 8229A issued by the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection to Hitchcock Chair Company, Ltd., on April 15,
2002.
(B) Consent Order No. 8190 issued by the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection to Kimberly Clark Corporation on April 23,
2002.
(C) Consent Order No. 8200 issued by the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection to Watson Laboratories, Inc., on October 3,
2002.
(D) Consent Order No. 8237 issued by the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection to Ross & Roberts, Inc., on October 4, 2002.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
0
3. In Sec. 52.385, Table 52.385 is amended by adding new entries to
existing state citation 22a-174-32 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.385 EPA-approved Connecticut regulations.
* * * * *
Table 52.385.--EPA-Approved Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dates
--------------------------
Connecticut State citation Title/subject Date Date Federal Register Section Comments/description
adopted by approved by citation 52.370
State EPA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
22a-174-32..................... Reasonably 4/15/02 10/24/05 [Insert FR (c)(96) VOC RACT for Hitchcock Chair.
available citation from
control published date].
technology for
volatile organic
compounds.
22a-174-32..................... Reasonably 4/23/01 10/24/05 [Insert FR (c)(96) VOC RACT for Kimberly Clark.
available citation from
control published date].
technology for
volatile organic
compounds.
22a-174-32..................... Reasonably 10/03/02 10/24/05 [Insert FR (c)(96) VOC RACT for Watson Laboratories.
available citation from
control published date].
technology for
volatile organic
compounds.
22a-174-32..................... Reasonably 10/04/02 10/24/05 [Insert FR (c)(96) VOC RACT for Ross & Roberts.
available citation from
control published date].
technology for
volatile organic
compounds.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 61388]]
[FR Doc. 05-21194 Filed 10-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P