Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; Consumer Products Regulation, 61382-61384 [05-21192]
Download as PDF
61382
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R01–OAR–2005–ME–0004; A–1–FRL–7982–
3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Maine;
Consumer Products Regulation
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maine. This
revision establishes requirements to
reduce volatile organic compound
(VOC) emissions from consumer
products. The intended effect of this
action is to approve these requirements
into the Maine SIP. EPA is taking this
action in accordance with the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective December 23, 2005, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by
November 23, 2005. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R01–OAR–
2005–ME–0004 by one of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional
Material in EDocket (RME), EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key
in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
3. E-mail: conroy.dave@epa.gov.
4. Fax: (617) 918–0661.
5. Mail: ‘‘RME ID Number R01–OAR–
2005–ME–0004,’’ David Conroy, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, One
Congress Street, Suite 1100 (mail code
CAQ), Boston, MA 02114–2023.
6. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to: David Conroy, Chief,
Air Programs Branch, Office of
Ecosystem Protection, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, One
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:23 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAQ),
Boston, MA 02114–2023. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID
Number R01–OAR–2005–ME–0004.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through Regional Material in
EDocket (RME), regulations.gov, or email. The EPA RME Web site and the
federal regulations.gov Web site are
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through RME or
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
Regional Material in EDocket (RME)
index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in hard copy at the Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street,
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Suite 1100, Boston, MA. EPA requests
that if at all possible, you contact the
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anne Arnold, Air Quality Planning
Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA New England Regional
Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100
(CAQ), Boston, MA 02114–2023, (617)
918–1047, arnold.anne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. How Can I Get Copies of This
Document and Other Related
Information?
In addition to the publicly available
docket materials available for inspection
electronically in Regional Material in
EDocket, and the hard copy available at
the Regional Office, which are identified
in the ADDRESSES section above, copies
of the state submittal and EPA’s
technical support document are also
available for public inspection during
normal business hours, by appointment
at the Bureau of Air Quality Control,
Department of Environmental
Protection, First Floor of the Tyson
Building, Augusta Mental Health
Institute Complex, Augusta, ME 04333–
0017.
II. Rulemaking Information
This section is organized as follows:
A. What Action Is EPA Taking?
B. What Are the Requirements of Maine’s
New Regulation?
C. Why Is EPA Approving Maine’s
Regulation?
D. What Is the Process for EPA To Approve
This SIP Revision?
A. What Action Is EPA Taking?
EPA is approving Maine’s Chapter
152, ‘‘Control of Emissions of Volatile
Organic Compounds from Consumer
Products,’’ and incorporating this
regulation into the Maine SIP.
B. What Are the Requirements of
Maine’s New Regulation?
Maine’s Chapter 152 includes VOC
content limits for many categories of
consumer products such as deodorants,
hairsprays, and glass cleaners. Certain
products are, however, exempt from
these limits. Specifically, the rule
allows the use of innovative products
exemptions, variances, or alternative
control plans provided that they have
been approved by EPA into the Maine
SIP. In addition, Chapter 152 includes
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
the appropriate testing and
recordkeeping requirements to ensure
compliance with the specified
standards. Finally, the rule requires
compliance with the specified VOC
content limits by May 1, 2005.
C. Why Is EPA Approving Maine’s
Regulation?
EPA has evaluated Maine’s Chapter
152 and has found that this regulation
is consistent with EPA guidance and the
Ozone Transport Commission (OTC)
model rule for consumer products. The
specific requirements of the regulation
and EPA’s evaluation of these
requirements are detailed in a
memorandum, dated June 16, 2005,
entitled ‘‘Technical Support
Document—Maine—Consumer Products
Regulation’’ (TSD). The TSD and
Maine’s Chapter 152 are available in the
docket supporting this action.
The OTC has developed model rules
for several VOC source categories and
the OTC states, including Maine, have
signed a memorandum of understanding
(MOU) committing to adopt these model
rules. One of the categories for which a
model rule has been developed is
consumer products. (See ‘‘OTC Model
Rule for Consumer Products,’’ issued
March 28, 2001, revised November 29,
2001, and April 23, 2002.)
Several other OTC states have also
recently adopted a consumer products
rule based on the OTC model rule and
EPA has already approved some of these
states’ rules.1 The emission limits in
Maine’s rule are identical to those
contained in the OTC model rule. These
emission limits are at least as stringent
as, and in some cases more stringent
than, EPA’s national consumer products
rule, ‘‘National Volatile Organic
Compound Emission Standards for
Consumer Products,’’ 40 CFR Part 59,
Subpart C. Also, Maine’s rule includes
additional categories of consumer
products that are not included in EPA’s
rule.
Maine did not submit its August 27,
2004 Chapter 152 SIP submittal to meet
any specific control requirements under
the Clean Air Act. However,
subsequently, on June 9, 2005, Maine
submitted its 5 percent increment of
progress plan which relies on
reductions from Chapter 152. In today’s
action, EPA is approving Chapter 152
because it will strengthen Maine’s SIP.
EPA will evaluate the reductions Maine
is claiming from Chapter 152 in its 5
percent increment of progress plan
1 For example, on January 23, 2004, EPA
approved New York’s consumer products rule (69
FR 3237), and on December 9, 2003, EPA approved
Maryland’s consumer products rule (68 FR 68523).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:23 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
when the Agency takes action on that
plan.
D. What Is the Process for EPA To
Approve This SIP Revision?
The EPA is publishing this rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register
publication, EPA is publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision
should adverse comments be filed. This
action will be effective December 23,
2005 without further notice unless the
EPA receives adverse comments by
November 23, 2005.
If the EPA receives such comments,
then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period.
Parties interested in commenting should
do so at this time. If no such comments
are received, the public is advised that
this rule will be effective on December
23, 2005 and no further action will be
taken on the proposed rule. Please note
that if EPA receives adverse comment
on an amendment, paragraph, or section
of this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Maine’s Chapter
152, ‘‘Control of Emissions of Volatile
Organic Compounds from Consumer
Products,’’ and incorporating this
regulation into the Maine SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61383
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
federal government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
approves a state rule implementing a
federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the state to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
61384
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by December 23,
2005. Interested parties should
comment in response to the proposed
rule rather than petition for judicial
review, unless the objection arises after
the comment period allowed for in the
proposal. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 28, 2005.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart U—Maine
2. Section 52.1020 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(57) to read as
follows:
I
§ 52.1020
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(57) Revisions to the State
Implementation Plan submitted by the
Maine Department of Environmental
Protection on August 27, 2004, and
September 8, 2004.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 152 of the Maine
Department of Environmental Protection
Regulations, ‘‘Control of Emissions of
Volatile Organic Compounds from
Consumer Products,’’ effective in the
State of Maine on September 1, 2004.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the
submittal.
I 3. In § 52.1031, Table 52.1031 is
amended by adding a new State citation,
152, to read as follows:
§ 52.1031 EPA-approved Maine
Regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 52.1031.—EPA-APPROVED RULES AND REGULATIONS
State
citation
Title/subject
*
152 ..............
*
*
Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer Products
*
Date adopted
by State
*
Date approved
by EPA
*
8/19/04
*
10/24/05
*
Federal Register
citation
*
[Insert FR citation
from published
date]
52.1020
*
*
*
*
(c)(57).
*
Note.—1. The regulations are effective statewide unless stated otherwise in comments section.
[FR Doc. 05–21192 Filed 10–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R01–OAR–2005–CT–0002; A–1–FRL–7967–
2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Connecticut; VOC RACT Orders for
Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly
Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.;
and Ross & Roberts, Inc.
SUMMARY: EPA is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Connecticut.
These revisions incorporate volatile
organic compound (VOC) reasonably
available control technology (RACT)
state consent orders into the
Connecticut SIP for four facilities:
Hitchcock Chair Co., Ltd.; Kimberly
Clark Corp.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.;
and Ross & Roberts, Inc. This action will
have a beneficial effect on air quality by
reducing VOC emissions which
contribute to ground-level ozone
formation. EPA is taking this action in
accordance with the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
This direct final rule will be
effective December 23, 2005, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by
November 23, 2005. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will
DATES:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Direct final rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:23 Oct 21, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R01–OAR–
2005–CT–0002 by one of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional
Material in EDocket (RME), EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key
in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the on-
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 204 (Monday, October 24, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61382-61384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21192]
[[Page 61382]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R01-OAR-2005-ME-0004; A-1-FRL-7982-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maine; Consumer Products Regulation
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maine. This revision establishes requirements
to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from consumer
products. The intended effect of this action is to approve these
requirements into the Maine SIP. EPA is taking this action in
accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective December 23, 2005,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by November 23, 2005. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R01-OAR-2005-ME-0004 by one of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
2. Agency Web site: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional Material
in EDocket (RME), EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is
EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system,
select ``quick search,'' then key in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
3. E-mail: conroy.dave@epa.gov.
4. Fax: (617) 918-0661.
5. Mail: ``RME ID Number R01-OAR-2005-ME-0004,'' David Conroy, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, One
Congress Street, Suite 1100 (mail code CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023.
6. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: David
Conroy, Chief, Air Programs Branch, Office of Ecosystem Protection,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office,
One Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Regional Material in EDocket
(RME) ID Number R01-OAR-2005-ME-0004. EPA's policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public docket without change and may
be made available online at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including
any personal information provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not
submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected
through Regional Material in EDocket (RME), regulations.gov, or e-mail.
The EPA RME Web site and the federal regulations.gov Web site are
``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
Regional Material in EDocket (RME) index at https://docket.epa.gov/
rmepub/. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or in hard copy at the Office of
Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New
England Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA.
EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Arnold, Air Quality Planning
Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional
Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023,
(617) 918-1047, arnold.anne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information?
In addition to the publicly available docket materials available
for inspection electronically in Regional Material in EDocket, and the
hard copy available at the Regional Office, which are identified in the
ADDRESSES section above, copies of the state submittal and EPA's
technical support document are also available for public inspection
during normal business hours, by appointment at the Bureau of Air
Quality Control, Department of Environmental Protection, First Floor of
the Tyson Building, Augusta Mental Health Institute Complex, Augusta,
ME 04333-0017.
II. Rulemaking Information
This section is organized as follows:
A. What Action Is EPA Taking?
B. What Are the Requirements of Maine's New Regulation?
C. Why Is EPA Approving Maine's Regulation?
D. What Is the Process for EPA To Approve This SIP Revision?
A. What Action Is EPA Taking?
EPA is approving Maine's Chapter 152, ``Control of Emissions of
Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer Products,'' and incorporating
this regulation into the Maine SIP.
B. What Are the Requirements of Maine's New Regulation?
Maine's Chapter 152 includes VOC content limits for many categories
of consumer products such as deodorants, hairsprays, and glass
cleaners. Certain products are, however, exempt from these limits.
Specifically, the rule allows the use of innovative products
exemptions, variances, or alternative control plans provided that they
have been approved by EPA into the Maine SIP. In addition, Chapter 152
includes
[[Page 61383]]
the appropriate testing and recordkeeping requirements to ensure
compliance with the specified standards. Finally, the rule requires
compliance with the specified VOC content limits by May 1, 2005.
C. Why Is EPA Approving Maine's Regulation?
EPA has evaluated Maine's Chapter 152 and has found that this
regulation is consistent with EPA guidance and the Ozone Transport
Commission (OTC) model rule for consumer products. The specific
requirements of the regulation and EPA's evaluation of these
requirements are detailed in a memorandum, dated June 16, 2005,
entitled ``Technical Support Document--Maine--Consumer Products
Regulation'' (TSD). The TSD and Maine's Chapter 152 are available in
the docket supporting this action.
The OTC has developed model rules for several VOC source categories
and the OTC states, including Maine, have signed a memorandum of
understanding (MOU) committing to adopt these model rules. One of the
categories for which a model rule has been developed is consumer
products. (See ``OTC Model Rule for Consumer Products,'' issued March
28, 2001, revised November 29, 2001, and April 23, 2002.)
Several other OTC states have also recently adopted a consumer
products rule based on the OTC model rule and EPA has already approved
some of these states' rules.\1\ The emission limits in Maine's rule are
identical to those contained in the OTC model rule. These emission
limits are at least as stringent as, and in some cases more stringent
than, EPA's national consumer products rule, ``National Volatile
Organic Compound Emission Standards for Consumer Products,'' 40 CFR
Part 59, Subpart C. Also, Maine's rule includes additional categories
of consumer products that are not included in EPA's rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For example, on January 23, 2004, EPA approved New York's
consumer products rule (69 FR 3237), and on December 9, 2003, EPA
approved Maryland's consumer products rule (68 FR 68523).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maine did not submit its August 27, 2004 Chapter 152 SIP submittal
to meet any specific control requirements under the Clean Air Act.
However, subsequently, on June 9, 2005, Maine submitted its 5 percent
increment of progress plan which relies on reductions from Chapter 152.
In today's action, EPA is approving Chapter 152 because it will
strengthen Maine's SIP. EPA will evaluate the reductions Maine is
claiming from Chapter 152 in its 5 percent increment of progress plan
when the Agency takes action on that plan.
D. What Is the Process for EPA To Approve This SIP Revision?
The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
adverse comments be filed. This action will be effective December 23,
2005 without further notice unless the EPA receives adverse comments by
November 23, 2005.
If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on December 23, 2005 and no
further action will be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if
EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Maine's Chapter 152, ``Control of Emissions of
Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer Products,'' and incorporating
this regulation into the Maine SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the federal government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the federal
government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely approves a state rule
implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
state to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule
[[Page 61384]]
may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule
report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and other required information to
the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the
Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after
it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 23, 2005. Interested
parties should comment in response to the proposed rule rather than
petition for judicial review, unless the objection arises after the
comment period allowed for in the proposal. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 28, 2005.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
0
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart U--Maine
0
2. Section 52.1020 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(57) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.1020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(57) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the
Maine Department of Environmental Protection on August 27, 2004, and
September 8, 2004.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 152 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection
Regulations, ``Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from
Consumer Products,'' effective in the State of Maine on September 1,
2004.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
0
3. In Sec. 52.1031, Table 52.1031 is amended by adding a new State
citation, 152, to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1031 EPA-approved Maine Regulations.
* * * * *
Table 52.1031.--EPA-Approved Rules and Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date adopted Date approved
State citation Title/subject by State by EPA Federal Register citation 52.1020
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
152................... Control of Emissions 8/19/04 10/24/05 [Insert FR citation from (c)(57)...........
of Volatile Organic published date]
Compounds from
Consumer Products
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note.--1. The regulations are effective statewide unless stated otherwise in comments section.
[FR Doc. 05-21192 Filed 10-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P