Notice of Intent To Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Pinedale Anticline Oil and Gas and Exploration and Development Project, Sublette County, Wyoming, and Possible Amendment to the Pinedale Resource Management Plan, 61302-61304 [05-21170]
Download as PDF
61302
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Notices
water supply pump station with the
water filtration/injection plants.
The BLM consulted with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service about potential
effects on listed threatened and
endangered species from project
construction and operation. The Service
reviewed the DEIS and provided
comments. In March 2005, the BLM
submitted a Biological Assessment to
the Service, concluding that the project
may adversely affect the Uintah Basin
hookless cactus; may adversely affect
the Colorado pikeminnow, humpback
chub, bonytail and razorback sucker;
and may adversely modify designated
Critical Habitat for the four fish species
through depletions from the Upper
Colorado River System. In its Biological
Opinion, the Service concurred with the
BLM’s conclusions for these species.
The Biological Opinion contains
recommended conservation measures to
protect and recover the Uinta Basin
hookless cactus and the four Colorado
River native fish. The BLM has adopted
nearly all these conservation measures
(with minor modifications), and has
included these measures in the
conditions of approval. One exception is
the Service’s recommendation that no
further surface occupancy by oil and gas
facilities be approved in the Pariette
ACEC. Due to valid existing lease rights,
the BLM cannot stipulate a blanket ‘‘no
surface occupancy’’ requirement for oil
and gas development within this ACEC.
However, BLM has decided to defer
authorization of new wells and access
roads within the ACEC boundaries until
the needed inventories are completed.
The FEIS is a complete document. It
includes the Biological Opinion
received from the Service, plus a
presentation of substantive public
comments received on the DEIS. The
FEIS also includes BLM’s responses to
these comments. The FEIS includes
changes to the text in response to public
comments on the DEIS. These changes
were made to clarify, correct and/or
expand information to aid the public’s
understanding of the proposed project,
reasonable alternatives and their effects
on the environment.
Dated: August 31, 2005.
William Stringer,
Field Manager, Vernal Field Office.
[FR Doc. 05–21043 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–22–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 Oct 20, 2005
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and Initiate the Public Scoping
Process
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 and the Federal Land Policy
and Management Act of 1976, notice is
hereby given that the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), Challis Field
Office, will be directing the preparation
of an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) that will analyze the mining
impacts resulting from L&W Stone’s
Amended Plan of Operations in Custer
County, Idaho.
DATES: The scoping comment period
will commence with the publication of
this notice and will end 45 days after
publication of this notice. Two public
meetings will be held during the
scoping comment period. Comments on
the scope of the EIS, including
concerns, issues, or proposed
alternatives that should be considered
in the EIS should be submitted in
writing to the address below. The dates
of public meetings to be held in Challis
and Boise, Idaho will be announced
through the local media, newsletters,
and BLM’s National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) mailing list. The
draft EIS is expected to be available for
public review and comment in June
2006 and the final EIS is expected to be
available in August 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to Chuck Horsburgh, Project
Leader, Idaho Falls District Office, 1405
Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho
83401. Faxes should be sent to 208–
524–7505. Comments received on this
proposal, including names and
addresses, will be considered part of the
public record and will be available for
public inspection during regular office
hours, Monday–Friday, 8–4:30 p.m.
Individual respondents may request
confidentiality. If you wish to withhold
your name and street address from
public review or from disclosure under
the Freedom of Information Act, you
must state this prominently at the
beginning of your written comment.
Such requests will be honored to the
extent allowed by law. All submissions
from organizations and businesses, and
from individuals identifying themselves
as representatives or officials for
organizations or businesses, will be
available for public inspection in their
entirety.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chuck Horsburgh, Project Leader, Idaho
Falls District Office, 1405 Hollipark
Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401; or
phone at (208) 524–7530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: L&W
Stone Corporation mines locatable
flagstone on public lands administered
by the BLM’s Challis Field Office in
Custer County, Idaho. L&W Stone
submitted an Amended Plan of
Operations for their quarry under the 43
CFR 3809 Regulations in December
2002. The BLM completed an
Environmental Assessment (EA)
regarding the Amended Plan of
Operations, signed a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI), and
approved the project. As a result of a
lawsuit that was filed objecting to that
approval, the BLM was ordered by a
Federal District Court judge to prepare
an EIS for the Amended Plan of
Operations. The Amended Plan of
Operations will serve as the basis for the
EIS project description. The BLM will
analyze a range of alternatives in the
EIS. As proposed in the Amended Plan
of Operations, the quarry would operate
for up to 40 years. The main product
that is mined is large-diameter sheets of
rock called flagstone which is used in
both indoor and outdoor decorative
construction.
Dated: August 30, 2005.
David Rosenkrance,
Challis Field Manager, BLM.
[FR Doc. 05–21042 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[WY–100–05–1310–DB]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS) for the Pinedale
Anticline Oil and Gas and Exploration
and Development Project, Sublette
County, Wyoming, and Possible
Amendment to the Pinedale Resource
Management Plan
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI) to
conduct public scoping and prepare an
SEIS to the Pinedale Anticline Oil and
Gas, and Exploration and Development
Project Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) and Record of Decision
(ROD), July 2000.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Notices
Bureau of Land Management (BLM),
Pinedale Field Office, announces its
intent to prepare an SEIS on the
potential impacts of authorizing year
round natural gas and condensate/oil
development activities within the
Pinedale Anticline Oil and Gas and
Exploration and Development Project
Area (PAPA). This supplemental
environmental impact analysis may be
used to amend the Pinedale Resource
Management Plan (1988). The Pinedale
Field Manager is the authorized officer
for this project.
This notice initiates the public
scoping process. The BLM can best use
public input if comments and resources
information are submitted within 30
days of the publication of this notice. To
provide the public with an opportunity
to review the proposal and project
information, the BLM will host a
meeting in Pinedale, Wyoming. The
BLM will notify the public of the
meeting date, time, and location at least
15 days prior to the event.
Announcement will be made by news
release to the media, individual letter
mailings, and posting on the BLM Web
site listed below if it is available.
DATES:
Please send written
comments or resource information to
the Bureau of Land Management,
Pinedale Field Office, Matt Anderson,
Project Manager, 432 East Mill Street,
P.O. Box 768, Pinedale, Wyoming
82941. Electronic mail may be sent to:
WYMail_PAPA_YRA@blm.gov.
Your response is important and will
be considered in the environmental
analysis process. If you do respond, we
will keep you informed of decisions
resulting from this analysis. Please note
that public comments and information
submitted regarding this project
including names, street addresses, and
e-mail addresses of the respondents will
be available for public review and
disclosure at the above address during
regular business hours (7:45 a.m. to 4:30
p.m.) Monday through Friday, except
holidays. Individual respondents may
request confidentiality. If you wish to
withhold your name, address, or e-mail
address from public review or from
disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act, you must state this
plainly at the beginning of your written
comment. Such requests will be
honored to the extent allowed by the
law. All submissions from organizations
or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public inspection in
their entirety.
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 Oct 20, 2005
Jkt 208001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bureau of Land Management, Matt
Anderson, Project Manager, 432 East
Mill Street, P.O. Box 768, Pinedale,
Wyoming 82941. Mr. Anderson may
also be reached by telephone at (307)
367–5328, or by sending an electronic
message to: matt_anderson@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM
completed an FEIS and issued a ROD for
the PAPA in July 2000. The BLM
conducted this analysis in response to
oil and gas field development activities
on the Pinedale Anticline. The previous
analysis considered three (3)
exploration and development scenarios
based on the density of well pad
development by aliquot section, each
with its own mitigation. To protect big
game crucial winter range, the FEIS
delineated areas within the PAPA where
oil and gas development and its
associated human activities would be
restricted during the winter months
from November 15 through April 30.
The FEIS and ROD provided that the
BLM could grant limited exceptions to
this winter closure period based on
conditions at the time of authorization
such as presence of wintering animals
or depth of snow cover. However, each
exception was to be made on a case-bycase basis, annually, and usually with
the condition that should winter
conditions prevail, activities would
cease.
Starting in winter 2002–2003, the
BLM authorized Questar Exploration
and Development Company (Questar) to
continue gas development operations at
one well pad within big game crucial
winter range under the condition that
Questar cooperate fully with Wyoming
Game and Fish in conducting studies on
the impacts of these operations
consistent with the ongoing Sublette
Mule Deer Study. In November 2004,
the BLM approved a proposal made by
Questar to expand its winter
development activities and continue
conducting studies on the impacts to
wildlife (Questar Year-Round Drilling
Proposal Environmental Assessment,
November 2004).
Since then, other operators within the
Pinedale Anticline have expressed
interest in conducting development
activities, including year-round drilling
and completion within big game crucial
winter range, leading to BLM’s decision
to supplement the PAPA FEIS and ROD.
Description of the Proposed Action
On September 16, 2005, the BLM
received from Anschutz Pinedale
Corporation (Anschutz), Shell
Exploration and Production Company
(Shell), and Ultra Resources Inc. (Ultra)
representing themselves and other lease
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61303
holders in the area (collectively referred
to as the Operators), a proposal for yearround access to drill and develop
leaseholds within the PAPA. The
Operators propose to conduct year
round drilling and development
activities within the PAPA including
areas the State deems to be big game
crucial winter range. The PAPA
encompasses approximately 197,345
acres of primarily Federal lands (nearly
80 percent), and State and private land.
Approximately 83 percent of the
mineral estate underlying the PAPA is
Federally-owned. The Operators have
proposed developing the oil and gas
resources from between 400 and 475
pad locations with multiple wells from
each pad. The bottom hole well spacing
is proposed at approximately 1 well per
10 acres. The Operators propose to
conduct natural gas drilling and
development, including placement of
ancillary facilities such as gas gathering
lines and road construction on a yearround basis. Development is expected to
take 15 to 18 years as proposed with an
operational field life of approximately
50 years.
To develop an entire aliquot section
(640 acres) at a bottom hole spacing of
approximately 1 well per 10 acres, the
Operators propose to place one large
well pad in a central location where
feasible. Where topographical
conditions are limiting, the Operators
propose to construct two well pads per
section. The centralized well pads are
estimated to range in size from 10 to 15
acres for a pad with 16 well bores and
20 to 30 acres for a pad with 64 well
bores.
Whenever possible the Operators
propose to reuse and expand existing
pads before constructing new pads. Well
pads would accommodate the
simultaneous drilling of multiple
directional wells and completion and
production operations. Concurrent with
the drilling and development activities,
the Operators propose to collect data,
monitor, and study and evaluate the
effects of these types of activities during
the winter months (November 15
through April 30) on big game, sagegrouse and other sage brush obligates
and their habitats. This proposal is in
accordance with BLM’s multiple-use
mandate and the goals and objectives of
the President’s National Energy Policy.
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the year-round
drilling proposal is to exercise existing
lease rights and expedite production of
domestic oil and gas resources from the
PAPA in an efficient and orderly
manner and deliver those resources to
the market and consumers. One of the
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
61304
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Notices
identified needs for the EIS at this time
is based on the continuing increase in
the United States’ demand for natural
gas. Year round development will
expedite delivery of trillions of cubic
feet of natural gas and thousands of
barrels of oil/condensate to the market.
Identified benefits that may be derived
from oil and gas development also
include increased royalty and tax
revenue to local, State and Federal
governments and additional
opportunities for employment and
economic benefits at the local and
regional level. This proposal meets the
goals and objectives of the National
Energy Policy.
Anticipated Issues and Management
Concerns
Preliminary issues identified at this
time include: (1) Paleontological,
archaeological, historic and cultural
resources; (2) wildlife, including big
game species (mule deer, antelope, etc.);
(3) Threatened and Endangered plant
and animal species; (4) BLM sensitive
species such as the greater sage-grouse;
(5) surface and ground water resources;
(6) transportation and road access; (7)
vegetation (including the potential
introduction of noxious weeds, shortterm re-vegetation and rehabilitation of
disturbed areas, and long-term
establishment and stabilization of
perennial vegetation through
recommended reclamation measures);
(8) air quality and existing scenic
quality of the landscape; (9) socioeconomic impact; and (10) potential for
amendment to the Pinedale Resource
Management Plan.
This list of preliminary issues is not
final. Identification of additional issues
and/or issue refinement through the
public participation process is
anticipated. Comments should address:
(1) Issues to be considered for analysis;
(2) reasonable alternatives; and (3)
relevant information for consideration
relating to the analysis of year-round
field development in the PAPA. The EIS
will consider comments and other
issues/concerns raised during the
scoping period in addition to those
issues identified in this notice. The
BLM may use the information collected
during the scoping period to: (1)
Develop/analyze appropriate mitigation
as Conditions of Approval under which
the proposed development may take
place; (2) consider potential reasonable
alternatives to the proposed action; or
(3) both.
Consistency With Land Use Plans,
NEPA, and Potential Plan Amendments
The Pinedale RMP/EIS revision is
currently under development. The BLM
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 Oct 20, 2005
Jkt 208001
will ensure that its actions with respect
to future decisions are consistent with
the applicable laws and regulations. In
the event the decision on this EIS
includes an amendment to the existing
Pinedale RMP, the amendment will be
based on the following preliminary
Planning Criteria: (1) The plan
amendment will recognize the existence
of valid existing rights; (2) lands
covered in the RMP amendment will be
public lands, which include federal
mineral estate with private surface; (3)
the BLM will use a collaborative and
multi-jurisdictional approach, where
possible, to jointly determine the
desired future condition of public lands;
(4) the BLM will make all possible
attempts to ensure that its management
prescriptions and amended planning
actions are as complementary as
possible to other planning jurisdictions,
within the boundaries described by law
and policy; (5) the BLM will consider
the management prescriptions on
adjoining lands to minimize
inconsistent management and, to the
extent possible, BLM will coordinate
inventories, planning, and management
programs with other federal, state,
tribal, and local governments and
agencies; (6) management prescriptions
will focus on the relative values of
resources and not necessarily the
combination of uses that will give the
greatest economic return or economic
output; (7) to the extent possible, the
BLM will use current scientific
information, research, new technologies
and the results of resource assessments,
monitoring and coordination to
determine appropriate local and
regional management strategies that will
enhance or recover impaired
ecosystems; and (8) the plan
amendment will be completed in
compliance with FLPMA, NEPA, and all
other relevant federal laws, executive
orders and management policies of the
BLM.
Alternatives
The BLM has identified three
preliminary alternatives including the
proposed action:
• The no action alternative which
would continue to allow drilling and
development subject to winter
restrictions.
• An alternative that would provide
for year-round drilling and development
activities without winter restrictions.
• An alternative that would provide
for limited year-round drilling and
development activities combined with
application of timing restrictions to only
the most critical wildlife habitats.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Site-Specific NEPA
While this EIS is intended to analyze
site-specific impacts, additional sitespecific NEPA analysis and/or
documentation may be required before
individual activities are approved based
on a review of the specific conditions
and any new information on
environmental effects not considered in
existing NEPA documentation at the
time activities are proposed.
Alan L. Kesterke,
Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 05–21170 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[CO–923–1430–ET; COC–28810]
Public Land Order No. 7647;
Revocation of 2 Secretarial Orders and
15 Executive Orders; Colorado
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Public land order.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This order revokes 2
Secretarial Orders and 15 Executive
Orders insofar as they affect
approximately 1,189,600 acres of public
lands, National Forest System lands,
and patented lands with federallyreserved mineral interests which were
withdrawn for coal classifications in
Colorado. These lands are no longer
needed for the purpose for which they
were withdrawn. This order will open
the public lands to surface entry and
nonmetalliferous mining, the National
Forest System lands to such forms of
disposition as may by law be authorized
on National Forest System lands and to
nonmetalliferous mining, and the
federally-reserved mineral interests to
nonmetalliferous mining.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 21, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris E. Chelius, BLM Colorado State
Office, 2850 Youngfield Street,
Lakewood, Colorado 80215, 303–230–
3706.
These
withdrawals were made to protect the
coal reserves for the United States. Coal
was declared a leasable mineral by the
Mineral Leasing Act and the protection
from these withdrawals is no longer
needed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Order
By virtue of the authority vested in
the Secretary of the Interior by section
204(a) of the Federal Land Policy and
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61302-61304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21170]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[WY-100-05-1310-DB]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS) for the Pinedale Anticline Oil and Gas and Exploration
and Development Project, Sublette County, Wyoming, and Possible
Amendment to the Pinedale Resource Management Plan
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI) to conduct public scoping and prepare an
SEIS to the Pinedale Anticline Oil and Gas, and Exploration and
Development Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and
Record of Decision (ROD), July 2000.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the
[[Page 61303]]
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Pinedale Field Office, announces its
intent to prepare an SEIS on the potential impacts of authorizing year
round natural gas and condensate/oil development activities within the
Pinedale Anticline Oil and Gas and Exploration and Development Project
Area (PAPA). This supplemental environmental impact analysis may be
used to amend the Pinedale Resource Management Plan (1988). The
Pinedale Field Manager is the authorized officer for this project.
DATES: This notice initiates the public scoping process. The BLM can
best use public input if comments and resources information are
submitted within 30 days of the publication of this notice. To provide
the public with an opportunity to review the proposal and project
information, the BLM will host a meeting in Pinedale, Wyoming. The BLM
will notify the public of the meeting date, time, and location at least
15 days prior to the event. Announcement will be made by news release
to the media, individual letter mailings, and posting on the BLM Web
site listed below if it is available.
ADDRESSES: Please send written comments or resource information to the
Bureau of Land Management, Pinedale Field Office, Matt Anderson,
Project Manager, 432 East Mill Street, P.O. Box 768, Pinedale, Wyoming
82941. Electronic mail may be sent to: WYMail--PAPA--YRA@blm.gov.
Your response is important and will be considered in the
environmental analysis process. If you do respond, we will keep you
informed of decisions resulting from this analysis. Please note that
public comments and information submitted regarding this project
including names, street addresses, and e-mail addresses of the
respondents will be available for public review and disclosure at the
above address during regular business hours (7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.)
Monday through Friday, except holidays. Individual respondents may
request confidentiality. If you wish to withhold your name, address, or
e-mail address from public review or from disclosure under the Freedom
of Information Act, you must state this plainly at the beginning of
your written comment. Such requests will be honored to the extent
allowed by the law. All submissions from organizations or businesses,
and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or
officials of organizations or businesses, will be made available for
public inspection in their entirety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Matt
Anderson, Project Manager, 432 East Mill Street, P.O. Box 768,
Pinedale, Wyoming 82941. Mr. Anderson may also be reached by telephone
at (307) 367-5328, or by sending an electronic message to: matt_
anderson@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM completed an FEIS and issued a ROD
for the PAPA in July 2000. The BLM conducted this analysis in response
to oil and gas field development activities on the Pinedale Anticline.
The previous analysis considered three (3) exploration and development
scenarios based on the density of well pad development by aliquot
section, each with its own mitigation. To protect big game crucial
winter range, the FEIS delineated areas within the PAPA where oil and
gas development and its associated human activities would be restricted
during the winter months from November 15 through April 30.
The FEIS and ROD provided that the BLM could grant limited
exceptions to this winter closure period based on conditions at the
time of authorization such as presence of wintering animals or depth of
snow cover. However, each exception was to be made on a case-by-case
basis, annually, and usually with the condition that should winter
conditions prevail, activities would cease.
Starting in winter 2002-2003, the BLM authorized Questar
Exploration and Development Company (Questar) to continue gas
development operations at one well pad within big game crucial winter
range under the condition that Questar cooperate fully with Wyoming
Game and Fish in conducting studies on the impacts of these operations
consistent with the ongoing Sublette Mule Deer Study. In November 2004,
the BLM approved a proposal made by Questar to expand its winter
development activities and continue conducting studies on the impacts
to wildlife (Questar Year-Round Drilling Proposal Environmental
Assessment, November 2004).
Since then, other operators within the Pinedale Anticline have
expressed interest in conducting development activities, including
year-round drilling and completion within big game crucial winter
range, leading to BLM's decision to supplement the PAPA FEIS and ROD.
Description of the Proposed Action
On September 16, 2005, the BLM received from Anschutz Pinedale
Corporation (Anschutz), Shell Exploration and Production Company
(Shell), and Ultra Resources Inc. (Ultra) representing themselves and
other lease holders in the area (collectively referred to as the
Operators), a proposal for year-round access to drill and develop
leaseholds within the PAPA. The Operators propose to conduct year round
drilling and development activities within the PAPA including areas the
State deems to be big game crucial winter range. The PAPA encompasses
approximately 197,345 acres of primarily Federal lands (nearly 80
percent), and State and private land. Approximately 83 percent of the
mineral estate underlying the PAPA is Federally-owned. The Operators
have proposed developing the oil and gas resources from between 400 and
475 pad locations with multiple wells from each pad. The bottom hole
well spacing is proposed at approximately 1 well per 10 acres. The
Operators propose to conduct natural gas drilling and development,
including placement of ancillary facilities such as gas gathering lines
and road construction on a year-round basis. Development is expected to
take 15 to 18 years as proposed with an operational field life of
approximately 50 years.
To develop an entire aliquot section (640 acres) at a bottom hole
spacing of approximately 1 well per 10 acres, the Operators propose to
place one large well pad in a central location where feasible. Where
topographical conditions are limiting, the Operators propose to
construct two well pads per section. The centralized well pads are
estimated to range in size from 10 to 15 acres for a pad with 16 well
bores and 20 to 30 acres for a pad with 64 well bores.
Whenever possible the Operators propose to reuse and expand
existing pads before constructing new pads. Well pads would accommodate
the simultaneous drilling of multiple directional wells and completion
and production operations. Concurrent with the drilling and development
activities, the Operators propose to collect data, monitor, and study
and evaluate the effects of these types of activities during the winter
months (November 15 through April 30) on big game, sage-grouse and
other sage brush obligates and their habitats. This proposal is in
accordance with BLM's multiple-use mandate and the goals and objectives
of the President's National Energy Policy.
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the year-round drilling proposal is to exercise
existing lease rights and expedite production of domestic oil and gas
resources from the PAPA in an efficient and orderly manner and deliver
those resources to the market and consumers. One of the
[[Page 61304]]
identified needs for the EIS at this time is based on the continuing
increase in the United States' demand for natural gas. Year round
development will expedite delivery of trillions of cubic feet of
natural gas and thousands of barrels of oil/condensate to the market.
Identified benefits that may be derived from oil and gas development
also include increased royalty and tax revenue to local, State and
Federal governments and additional opportunities for employment and
economic benefits at the local and regional level. This proposal meets
the goals and objectives of the National Energy Policy.
Anticipated Issues and Management Concerns
Preliminary issues identified at this time include: (1)
Paleontological, archaeological, historic and cultural resources; (2)
wildlife, including big game species (mule deer, antelope, etc.); (3)
Threatened and Endangered plant and animal species; (4) BLM sensitive
species such as the greater sage-grouse; (5) surface and ground water
resources; (6) transportation and road access; (7) vegetation
(including the potential introduction of noxious weeds, short-term re-
vegetation and rehabilitation of disturbed areas, and long-term
establishment and stabilization of perennial vegetation through
recommended reclamation measures); (8) air quality and existing scenic
quality of the landscape; (9) socio-economic impact; and (10) potential
for amendment to the Pinedale Resource Management Plan.
This list of preliminary issues is not final. Identification of
additional issues and/or issue refinement through the public
participation process is anticipated. Comments should address: (1)
Issues to be considered for analysis; (2) reasonable alternatives; and
(3) relevant information for consideration relating to the analysis of
year-round field development in the PAPA. The EIS will consider
comments and other issues/concerns raised during the scoping period in
addition to those issues identified in this notice. The BLM may use the
information collected during the scoping period to: (1) Develop/analyze
appropriate mitigation as Conditions of Approval under which the
proposed development may take place; (2) consider potential reasonable
alternatives to the proposed action; or (3) both.
Consistency With Land Use Plans, NEPA, and Potential Plan Amendments
The Pinedale RMP/EIS revision is currently under development. The
BLM will ensure that its actions with respect to future decisions are
consistent with the applicable laws and regulations. In the event the
decision on this EIS includes an amendment to the existing Pinedale
RMP, the amendment will be based on the following preliminary Planning
Criteria: (1) The plan amendment will recognize the existence of valid
existing rights; (2) lands covered in the RMP amendment will be public
lands, which include federal mineral estate with private surface; (3)
the BLM will use a collaborative and multi-jurisdictional approach,
where possible, to jointly determine the desired future condition of
public lands; (4) the BLM will make all possible attempts to ensure
that its management prescriptions and amended planning actions are as
complementary as possible to other planning jurisdictions, within the
boundaries described by law and policy; (5) the BLM will consider the
management prescriptions on adjoining lands to minimize inconsistent
management and, to the extent possible, BLM will coordinate
inventories, planning, and management programs with other federal,
state, tribal, and local governments and agencies; (6) management
prescriptions will focus on the relative values of resources and not
necessarily the combination of uses that will give the greatest
economic return or economic output; (7) to the extent possible, the BLM
will use current scientific information, research, new technologies and
the results of resource assessments, monitoring and coordination to
determine appropriate local and regional management strategies that
will enhance or recover impaired ecosystems; and (8) the plan amendment
will be completed in compliance with FLPMA, NEPA, and all other
relevant federal laws, executive orders and management policies of the
BLM.
Alternatives
The BLM has identified three preliminary alternatives including the
proposed action:
The no action alternative which would continue to allow
drilling and development subject to winter restrictions.
An alternative that would provide for year-round drilling
and development activities without winter restrictions.
An alternative that would provide for limited year-round
drilling and development activities combined with application of timing
restrictions to only the most critical wildlife habitats.
Site-Specific NEPA
While this EIS is intended to analyze site-specific impacts,
additional site-specific NEPA analysis and/or documentation may be
required before individual activities are approved based on a review of
the specific conditions and any new information on environmental
effects not considered in existing NEPA documentation at the time
activities are proposed.
Alan L. Kesterke,
Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 05-21170 Filed 10-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P