Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Specifications and Management Measures; Inseason Adjustments; Correction, 61062-61067 [05-21088]
Download as PDF
61062
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 202 / Thursday, October 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
urbanized areas: New York, NY; Los
Angeles, CA; Chicago, IL; Philadelphia,
PA: San Francisco, CA; Detroit, MI;
Boston, MA; Houston, TX; Washington,
DC; Dallas-Fort Worth, TX; Miami, FL;
Cleveland, OH; St. Louis, MO; Atlanta,
GA; Pittsburgh, PA; Baltimore, MD;
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN; Seattle, WA;
San Diego, CA; and Tampa-St.
Petersburg, FL. The coordinates for the
centers of these areas are those
referenced in § 90.635, except that the
coordinates (referenced to North
American Datum 1983 (NAD83)) for
Tampa-St. Petersburg are latitude
28°00′1.1″ N, longitude 82°26′59.3″ W.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) The effective radiated power and
antenna height for base stations may not
exceed 1 kilowatt (30 dBw) and 304 m.
(1,000 ft.) above average terrain (AAT),
respectively, or the equivalent thereof as
determined from the Table. These are
maximum values, and applicants will be
required to justify power levels and
antenna heights requested.
(b) The maximum output power of the
transmitter for mobile stations is 100
watts (20 dBw).
TABLE.—EQUIVALENT POWER AND ANTENNA HEIGHTS FOR BASE STATIONS IN THE 851–869 MHZ AND
935–940 MHZ BANDS WHICH HAVE
A REQUIREMENT FOR A 32 KM (20
MI) SERVICE AREA RADIUS
Antenna height (ATT) meters
(feet)
Effective radiated power
(watts) 1 2 4
Above 1,372 (4,500) .............
Above 1,220 (4,000) to 1,372
(4,500) ...............................
Above 1,067 (3,500) to 1,220
(4,000) ...............................
Above 915 (3,000) to 1,067
(3,500) ...............................
Above 763 (2,500) to 915
(3,000) ...............................
Above 610 (2,000) to 763
(2,500) ...............................
Above 458 (1,500) to 610
(2,000) ...............................
Above 305 (1,000) to 458
(1,500) ...............................
Up to 305 (1,000) .................
65
70
75
100
140
200
350
600
3 1,000
1 Power is given in terms of effective radiated power (ERP).
2 Applicants in the Los Angeles, CA, area
who demonstrate a need to serve both the
downtown and fringe areas will be permitted to
utilize an ERP of 1 kw at the following mountaintop sites: Santiago Park, Sierra Peak,
Mount Lukens, and Mount Wilson.
15:59 Oct 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
I
§ 90.658
I
[Removed]
27. Section 90.653 is removed.
[Removed]
28. Section 90.658 is removed.
§ 90.693
[Removed]
29. Section 90.693 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read
as follows:
I
*
Limitations on power and antenna
VerDate Aug<31>2005
§ 90.653
§ 90.693 Grandfathering provisions for
incumbent licensees.
26. Section 90.635 is revised read as
follows:
I
§ 90.635
height.
3 Stations with antennas below 305 m
(1,000 ft) (AAT) will be restricted to a maximum power of 1 kw (ERP).
4 Licensees in San Diego, CA, will be permitted to utilize an ERP of 500 watts at the
following mountaintop sites: Palomar, Otay,
Woodson and Miguel.
*
*
*
*
(b) Spectrum blocks A through V. An
incumbent licensee’s service area shall
be defined by its originally licensed 40
dBµV/m field strength contour and its
interference contour shall be defined as
its originally-licensed 22 dBµV/m field
strength contour. The ‘‘originallylicensed’’ contour shall be calculated
using the maximum ERP and the actual
height of the antenna above average
terrain (HAAT) along each radial.
Incumbent licensees are permitted to
add, remove or modify transmitter sites
within their original 22 dBµV/m field
strength contour without prior
notification to the Commission so long
as their original 22 dBµV/m field
strength contour is not expanded.
Incumbent licensee protection extends
only to its 40 dBµV/m signal strength
contour. Pursuant to the minor
modification notification procedures set
forth in 1.947(b), the incumbent licensee
must notify the Commission within 30
days of any change in technical
parameters for stations that are
authorized under a waiver of
90.621(b)(4), or that are authorized
under 90.621(b)(5).
(c) Special provisions for spectrum
blocks F1 through V. Incumbent
licensees that have received the consent
of all affected parties or a certified
frequency coordinator to utilize an 18
dBµV/m signal strength interference
contour shall have their service area
defined by their originally-licensed 36
dBµV/m field strength contour and their
interference contour shall be defined as
their originally-licensed 18 dBµV/m
field strength contour. The ‘‘originallylicensed’’ contour shall be calculated
using the maximum ERP and the actual
HAAT along each radial. Incumbent
licensees seeking to utilize an 18 dBµV/
m signal strength interference contour
shall first seek to obtain the consent of
affected co-channel incumbents. When
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the consent of a co-channel licensee is
withheld, an incumbent licensee may
submit to any certified frequency
coordinator an engineering study
showing that interference will not
occur, together with proof that the
incumbent licensee has sought consent.
Incumbent licensees are permitted to
add, remove or modify transmitter sites
within their original 18 dBµV/m field
strength contour without prior
notification to the Commission so long
as their original 18 dBµV/m field
strength contour is not expanded.
Incumbent licensee protection extends
only to its 36 dBµV/m signal strength
contour. Pursuant to the minor
modification notification procedures set
forth in 1.947(b), the incumbent licensee
must notify the Commission within 30
days of any change in technical
parameters for stations that are
authorized under a waiver of
90.621(b)(4), or that are authorized
under 90.621(b)(5).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 90.737
I
[Removed]
30. Section 90.737 is removed.
31. Section 90.743 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) introductory text
and (c) to read as follows:
I
§ 90.743
Renewal expectancy.
(a) All licensees seeking renewal of
their authorizations at the end of their
license term must file a renewal
application in accordance with the
provisions of § 1.949 of this chapter.
Licensees must demonstrate, in their
application, that:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Phase I non-nationwide licensees
have license terms of 10 years, and
therefore must meet these requirements
10 years from the date of initial
authorization in order to receive a
renewal expectancy. Phase I nationwide
licensees and all Phase II licensees have
license terms of 10 years, and therefore
must meet these requirements 10 years
from the date of initial authorization in
order to receive a renewal expectancy.
[FR Doc. 05–20927 Filed 10–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 202 / Thursday, October 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 051014263-5263-01; I.D.
093005A]
RIN 0648 AU00
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries off West Coast States and in
the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery; Specifications and
Management Measures; Inseason
Adjustments; Correction
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains
corrections to the inseason adjustments
that became effective on October 1,
2005. The inseason adjustment
contained an error in the limited entry
trawl trip limit table, Table 3 (South), on
page 58076. The trip limit for petrale
sole on line 16 should have been closed
only south of 38° N. lat., as stated in the
preamble, rather than south of 40°10′ N.
lat. as depicted in the table. These
regulations implemented changes to the
2005–2006 fishery specifications and
management measures for groundfish
taken in the U.S. exclusive economic
zone off the coasts of Washington,
Oregon, and California.
DATES: Effective 0001 hours (local time)
October 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jamie Goen (Northwest Region, NMFS),
phone: 206–526–4646; fax: 206–526–
6736 and; e-mail: jamie.goen@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This correcting notification also is
accessible via the Internet at the Office
of the Federal Register’s website at
https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/
index.html. Background information
and documents are available at the
NMFS Northwest Region website https://
www.nwr.noaa.govlsustfsh/gdfsh01.htm
and at the Council’s website at https://
www.pcouncil.org.
Background
The regulations that are the subject of
this correction are at 50 CFR 660,
subpart G. These regulations affect
persons operating in the limited entry
trawl fishery for groundfish species off
the U.S. West Coast.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:59 Oct 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
Need for Correction
As published, the inseason
adjustment contained an error which
needs to be corrected. This action
provides one correction to the inseason
adjustment. The inseason adjustment
published in the Federal Register on
October 5, 2005 (70 FR 58066),
contained an error in the limited entry
trawl trip limit table, Table 3 (South), on
page 58076. The trip limit for petrale
sole on line 16 should have been closed
only south of 38° N. lat., as stated in the
preamble, rather than south of 40°10′ N.
lat. as depicted in the table.
As stated in the preamble to the
inseason adjustment (70 FR 58066,
October 5, 2005), the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Pacific Council)
recommended at its September 18–23,
2005, meeting in Portland, OR, that
NMFS implement a seaward limited
entry trawl Rockfish Conservation Area
(RCA) boundary line approximating the
250–fm (457-m) depth contour
coastwide in order to nearly eliminate
the catch of petrale sole. However,
NMFS was not able to implement this
line south of 38° N. lat. to the U.S./
Mexico border because there are no
coordinates for this line in Federal
regulations. In order to be used as
boundary lines for inseason groundfish
management, coordinates must be
published in Federal regulations at 50
CFR Part 660. Therefore, in order to
implement the intent of the Pacific
Council recommendation as much as
possible, NMFS implemented a
boundary line approximating the 200–
fm (366–m) depth contour and a
prohibition on the retention of petrale
sole in this area during October.
Because there is catch of petrale
between 200–fm (366–m) and 250–fm
(457–m), including some targeting on
petrale sole, moving the RCA boundary
line from 150–fm (274–m) to 200–fm
(366–m) for October through December
would likely not keep total catch of
petrale sole within its ABC/OY for the
year. A reduction of the petrale sole trip
limit during the middle of a cumulative
trip limit period (in this case, September
through October) would make
enforcement of such limits difficult.
Mid-cumulative trip limit reductions are
difficult to enforce because some fishers
may have already achieved the higher
limits earlier in the period while others
who have not achieved their limit
previously are restricted to the lower
limits. It is difficult to query a paperbased fish landing ticket system midcumulative limit period to see if a fisher
is in violation. Thus, NMFS determined
that a closure is the best method for
achieving the goals of this action.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61063
Therefore, in addition to the line
change, NMFS also implemented a
prohibition on the retention of petrale
sole between 38° N. lat. and the U.S./
Mexico border during the month of
October in order to prevent targeting on
petrale sole. During November and
December, the Pacific Council
recommendation of decreasing the trip
limit for petrale sole to 2,000 lb (0.9 mt)
per 2 months was determined to be
sufficient to allow retention of
incidentally caught petrale sole while
not encouraging targeting. Therefore,
while the analysis suggested a
prohibition on the retention of petrale
sole between 38° N. lat. and the U.S./
Mexico border during the month of
October, the trip limit table, Table 3
(South), mistakenly showed the
prohibition on the retention of petrale
sole between 40°10′ N. lat. and the U.S./
Mexico border during the month of
October. This was an inadvertent
mistake resulting from the design of the
trip limit table (i.e., trip limits for a
species in Table 3 (South) apply
between 40°10′ N. lat. and the U.S./
Mexico border unless otherwise stated).
The prohibition on retention of petrale
sole should have been stated within that
table as applying south of 38° N. lat.
Without a correction to Federal
regulations, this fishery would be closed
between 38° N. lat. and 40°10′ N. lat.,
which is inconsistent with the intent of
the Pacific Council and NMFS. Between
38° N. lat. and 40°10′ N. lat., the limited
entry trawl RCA, which extends from
the shoreline to 250–fm (457–m), as
well as the reduced petrale sole trip
limits for November and December, are
expected to sufficiently reduce the take
of petrale sole to near zero through the
end of the year.
For these reasons, NMFS is amending
Federal regulations to correctly prohibit
the retention of petrale sole between 38°
N. lat. and the U.S./Mexico border
during the month of October in the trip
limit table, Table 3 (South).
Classification
The Assistant Administrator (AA) for
Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause to
waive the requirement to provide prior
notice and opportunity for public
comment on this action pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), because providing
prior notice and opportunity for
comment would be contrary to the
public interest. The correction is to
indicate that participants in the limited
entry trawl fishery are prohibited from
retaining petrale sole between 38° N. lat.
and the U.S./Mexico border during the
month of October in the trip limit table,
Table 3 (South). NMFS had mispublished this closure in its inseason
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
61064
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 202 / Thursday, October 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
adjustment for this action (70 FR 58066,
October 5, 2005). Prior notice and
opportunity for comment would
contravene the intent of this action,
which was to allow fishing for petrale
sole between 40°10′ N. lat. and 38° N.
lat. during October 2005. Providing
prior notice and opportunity for
comment would cost fishermen in lost
fishing opportunity during October and
to compound this loss by going through
prior notice and opportunity for
comment would in effect make the
action meaningless. Therefore, it is
contrary to the public interest to provide
prior notice and an opportunity for
public comment on this correction.
For these reasons, the AA finds also
finds good cause to waive the 30-day
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:59 Oct 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
delay in effectiveness requirement
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES AND IN THE
WESTERN PACIFIC
Administrative practice and
procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian Natives,
Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I
Dated: October 17, 2005.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
l. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In part 660, subpart G, Table 3
(South) is revised to read as follows:
I
Accordingly, 50 CFR part 660 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:59 Oct 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
61065
ER20OC05.009
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 202 / Thursday, October 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
61066
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 202 / Thursday, October 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
[FR Doc. 05–21088 Filed 10–18–05; 1:11 pm]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Oct 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
ER20OC05.010
BILLING CODE 3510–22–C
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 202 / Thursday, October 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 041126333–5040–02; I.D.
101705A]
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Pollock in Statistical
Area 630 of the Gulf of Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; modification of
a closure.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS is opening directed
fishing for pollock in Statistical Area
630 of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) for 48
hours. This action is necessary to fully
use the 2005 total allowable catch (TAC)
of pollock specified for Statistical Area
630.
DATES: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local
time (A.l.t.), October 17, 2005, through
1200 hrs, A.l.t., October 19, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh
Keaton, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the groundfish fishery in the
GOA exclusive economic zone
according to the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Oct 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
under authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act. Regulations governing
fishing by U.S. vessels in accordance
with the FMP appear at subpart H of 50
CFR part 600 and 50 CFR part 679.
NMFS closed the directed fishery for
pollock in Statistical Area 630 of the
GOA under § 679.20(d)(1)(iii) on
October 8, 2005 (70 FR 59676, October
13, 2005).
NMFS has determined that
approximately 1,700 mt of pollock
remain in the directed fishing
allowance. Therefore, in accordance
with 679.25(a)(2)(i)(C) and (a)(2)(iii)(D),
and to fully utilize the 2005 TAC of
pollock in Statistical Area 630, NMFS is
terminating the previous closure and is
reopening directed fishing for pollock in
Statistical Area 630 of the GOA. In
accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(iii), the
Regional Administrator finds that the
directed fishing allowance for pollock in
Statistical Area 630 of the GOA will be
reached after 48 hours. Consequently,
NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing for
pollock in Statistical Area 630 of the
GOA effective 1200 hrs, A.l.t., October
19, 2005.
Classification
This action responds to the best
available information recently obtained
from the fishery. The Assistant
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61067
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA
(AA), finds good cause to waive the
requirement to provide prior notice and
opportunity for public comment
pursuant to the authority set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. This requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest as it would prevent NMFS from
responding to the most recent fisheries
data in a timely fashion and would
delay the opening of pollock in
Statistical Area 630 of the GOA. NMFS
was unable to publish a notice
providing time for public comment
because the most recent, relevant data
only became available as of October 13,
2005.
The AA also finds good cause to
waive the 30-day delay in the effective
date of this action under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). This finding is based upon
the reasons provided above for waiver of
prior notice and opportunity for public
comment.
This action is required by section
679.20 and is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: October 17, 2005.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–20994 Filed 10–17–05; 1:14 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 202 (Thursday, October 20, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61062-61067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21088]
[[Page 61063]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 051014263-5263-01; I.D. 093005A]
RIN 0648 AU00
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries off West Coast States
and in the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;
Specifications and Management Measures; Inseason Adjustments;
Correction
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the inseason adjustments
that became effective on October 1, 2005. The inseason adjustment
contained an error in the limited entry trawl trip limit table, Table 3
(South), on page 58076. The trip limit for petrale sole on line 16
should have been closed only south of 38[deg] N. lat., as stated in the
preamble, rather than south of 40[deg]10' N. lat. as depicted in the
table. These regulations implemented changes to the 2005-2006 fishery
specifications and management measures for groundfish taken in the U.S.
exclusive economic zone off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and
California.
DATES: Effective 0001 hours (local time) October 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Goen (Northwest Region, NMFS),
phone: 206-526-4646; fax: 206-526-6736 and; e-mail:
jamie.goen@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This correcting notification also is accessible via the Internet at
the Office of the Federal Register's website at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/. Background information and documents
are available at the NMFS Northwest Region website https://
www.nwr.noaa.govlsustfsh/gdfsh01.htm and at the Council's website at
https://www.pcouncil.org.
Background
The regulations that are the subject of this correction are at 50
CFR 660, subpart G. These regulations affect persons operating in the
limited entry trawl fishery for groundfish species off the U.S. West
Coast.
Need for Correction
As published, the inseason adjustment contained an error which
needs to be corrected. This action provides one correction to the
inseason adjustment. The inseason adjustment published in the Federal
Register on October 5, 2005 (70 FR 58066), contained an error in the
limited entry trawl trip limit table, Table 3 (South), on page 58076.
The trip limit for petrale sole on line 16 should have been closed only
south of 38[deg] N. lat., as stated in the preamble, rather than south
of 40[deg]10' N. lat. as depicted in the table.
As stated in the preamble to the inseason adjustment (70 FR 58066,
October 5, 2005), the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Pacific
Council) recommended at its September 18-23, 2005, meeting in Portland,
OR, that NMFS implement a seaward limited entry trawl Rockfish
Conservation Area (RCA) boundary line approximating the 250-fm (457-m)
depth contour coastwide in order to nearly eliminate the catch of
petrale sole. However, NMFS was not able to implement this line south
of 38[deg] N. lat. to the U.S./Mexico border because there are no
coordinates for this line in Federal regulations. In order to be used
as boundary lines for inseason groundfish management, coordinates must
be published in Federal regulations at 50 CFR Part 660. Therefore, in
order to implement the intent of the Pacific Council recommendation as
much as possible, NMFS implemented a boundary line approximating the
200-fm (366-m) depth contour and a prohibition on the retention of
petrale sole in this area during October. Because there is catch of
petrale between 200-fm (366-m) and 250-fm (457-m), including some
targeting on petrale sole, moving the RCA boundary line from 150-fm
(274-m) to 200-fm (366-m) for October through December would likely not
keep total catch of petrale sole within its ABC/OY for the year. A
reduction of the petrale sole trip limit during the middle of a
cumulative trip limit period (in this case, September through October)
would make enforcement of such limits difficult. Mid-cumulative trip
limit reductions are difficult to enforce because some fishers may have
already achieved the higher limits earlier in the period while others
who have not achieved their limit previously are restricted to the
lower limits. It is difficult to query a paper-based fish landing
ticket system mid-cumulative limit period to see if a fisher is in
violation. Thus, NMFS determined that a closure is the best method for
achieving the goals of this action. Therefore, in addition to the line
change, NMFS also implemented a prohibition on the retention of petrale
sole between 38[deg] N. lat. and the U.S./Mexico border during the
month of October in order to prevent targeting on petrale sole. During
November and December, the Pacific Council recommendation of decreasing
the trip limit for petrale sole to 2,000 lb (0.9 mt) per 2 months was
determined to be sufficient to allow retention of incidentally caught
petrale sole while not encouraging targeting. Therefore, while the
analysis suggested a prohibition on the retention of petrale sole
between 38[deg] N. lat. and the U.S./Mexico border during the month of
October, the trip limit table, Table 3 (South), mistakenly showed the
prohibition on the retention of petrale sole between 40[deg]10' N. lat.
and the U.S./Mexico border during the month of October. This was an
inadvertent mistake resulting from the design of the trip limit table
(i.e., trip limits for a species in Table 3 (South) apply between
40[deg]10' N. lat. and the U.S./Mexico border unless otherwise stated).
The prohibition on retention of petrale sole should have been stated
within that table as applying south of 38[deg] N. lat.
Without a correction to Federal regulations, this fishery would be
closed between 38[deg] N. lat. and 40[deg]10' N. lat., which is
inconsistent with the intent of the Pacific Council and NMFS. Between
38[deg] N. lat. and 40[deg]10' N. lat., the limited entry trawl RCA,
which extends from the shoreline to 250-fm (457-m), as well as the
reduced petrale sole trip limits for November and December, are
expected to sufficiently reduce the take of petrale sole to near zero
through the end of the year.
For these reasons, NMFS is amending Federal regulations to
correctly prohibit the retention of petrale sole between 38[deg] N.
lat. and the U.S./Mexico border during the month of October in the trip
limit table, Table 3 (South).
Classification
The Assistant Administrator (AA) for Fisheries, NOAA, finds good
cause to waive the requirement to provide prior notice and opportunity
for public comment on this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
because providing prior notice and opportunity for comment would be
contrary to the public interest. The correction is to indicate that
participants in the limited entry trawl fishery are prohibited from
retaining petrale sole between 38[deg] N. lat. and the U.S./Mexico
border during the month of October in the trip limit table, Table 3
(South). NMFS had mis-published this closure in its inseason
[[Page 61064]]
adjustment for this action (70 FR 58066, October 5, 2005). Prior notice
and opportunity for comment would contravene the intent of this action,
which was to allow fishing for petrale sole between 40[deg]10' N. lat.
and 38[deg] N. lat. during October 2005. Providing prior notice and
opportunity for comment would cost fishermen in lost fishing
opportunity during October and to compound this loss by going through
prior notice and opportunity for comment would in effect make the
action meaningless. Therefore, it is contrary to the public interest to
provide prior notice and an opportunity for public comment on this
correction.
For these reasons, the AA finds also finds good cause to waive the
30-day delay in effectiveness requirement under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian Natives, Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 17, 2005.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
0
Accordingly, 50 CFR part 660 is corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES AND IN THE WESTERN
PACIFIC
0
l. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In part 660, subpart G, Table 3 (South) is revised to read as
follows:
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
[[Page 61065]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR20OC05.009
[[Page 61066]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR20OC05.010
[FR Doc. 05-21088 Filed 10-18-05; 1:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-C