Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Spa Creek, Annapolis, MD, 61034-61037 [05-21018]
Download as PDF
61034
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 202 / Thursday, October 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
analysis and documentation under those
sections. Under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are not required for this
rule.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a
regatta or marine event permit are
specifically excluded from further
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:59 Oct 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
I
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233, Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 100.35–T05–098
to read as follows:
I
§ 100.35–T05–098,
Norfolk, Virginia.
North
North
North
North
North
North
North
Longitude
076°18′42.0″
076°18′00.0″
076°18′14.0″
076°17′55.0″
076°18′06.0″
076°19′08.0″
076°18′42.0″
West
West
West
West
West
West
West
All coordinates reference Datum NAD
1983.
(b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Hampton Roads.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads
with a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels
participating in the Hampton Roads
Sailboard Classic under the auspices of
the Marine Event Permit issued to the
event sponsor and approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Hampton Roads.
(c) Special Local Regulations: (1)
Except for persons or vessels authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area must:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Dated: October 11, 2005.
S. Ratti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth
Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. 05–21017 Filed 10–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
Willoughby Bay,
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
is established for the waters of
Willoughby Bay contained within the
following coordinates:
Latitude
36°58′36.0″
36°58′00.0″
36°57′49.0″
36°57′36.0″
36°57′26.0″
36°58′15.0″
36°58′36.0″
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol
and then proceed only as directed.
(ii) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Official Patrol.
(iii) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course that minimizes
wake near the race course.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
on October 29 and 30, 2005.
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–05–104]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Spa Creek, Annapolis, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: On September 1, 2005, the
Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register requesting public
comments regarding establishment of
permanent special local regulations for
‘‘Tug-of-War’’, a marine event
conducted over the waters of Spa Creek
between Eastport and Annapolis,
Maryland. These special local
regulations are necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters
during the event. This action is
intended to restrict vessel traffic in
portions of Spa Creek during the event.
DATES: Effective October 20, 2005. For
2005 only, this rule is enforced from
9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. on October 29,
2005. Thereafter, this rule will be
enforced annually from 10:30 a.m. to
2:30 p.m. on the first Saturday in
November.
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket CGD05–05–104 and are available
for inspection or copying at Commander
(oax), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 202 / Thursday, October 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
23704–5004, between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis M. Sens, Project Manager,
Auxiliary and Recreational Boating
Safety Branch, at (757) 398–6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On September 1, 2005, we published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ‘‘Special Local
Regulations for Marine Events; Spa
Creek, Annapolis, MD’’ in the Federal
Register (70 FR 52054). We received no
letters commenting on the proposed
rule. The Coast Guard did receive
telephonic comments from the
Annapolis Harbormaster. No public
meeting was requested, and none was
held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying its effective date
would be contrary to public interest,
since immediate action is needed to
protect event participations, spectator
craft and other vessels transiting the
event area. However advance
notifications will be made to affected
waterway users via marine information
broadcasts, local radio stations and area
newspapers.
Background and Purpose
On October 29, 2005, the City of
Annapolis will sponsor the ‘‘Tug-ofWar’’, across the waters of Spa Creek
between Eastport and Annapolis,
Maryland. The event will consist of a
tug of war between teams on the
Eastport side of Spa Creek pulling
against teams on the Annapolis side of
Spa Creek. The opposing teams will pull
a floating rope approximately 1700 feet
in length, spanning Spa Creek. A fleet
of spectator vessels is anticipated to
gather nearby to view the competition.
Due to the need for vessel control while
the rope is spanned across Spa Creek,
vessel traffic will be temporarily
restricted to provide for the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
One comment was received in
response to the notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) published in the
Federal Register.
The Coast Guard received comment
from the Annapolis, MD Harbormaster
that recommended a change in the times
of the event scheduled for October 29,
2005 than previously announced in the
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:59 Oct 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
that was published on September 1,
2005. This final rule will change the
time of the special local regulations. For
2005 only, this special local regulation
will be enforced from 9:30 a.m. until 12
p.m. on October 29, 2005.
The Coast Guard has modified the
time of the event to accommodate local
waterway users. Accordingly, the Coast
Guard is establishing permanent special
local regulations on specified waters of
Spa Creek. The regulated area will
include a 400 foot buffer on either side
of the rope that spans Spa Creek from
shoreline to shoreline.
This rule will be enforced annually
from 10:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the first
Saturday in November and will restrict
general navigation in the regulated area
during the event. Except for participants
and vessels authorized by the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander, no person or
vessel shall enter or remain in the
regulated area. The Coast Guard Patrol
Commander may stop the event to allow
vessels to transit the regulated area.
For 2005 only, the enforcement period
of the regulation will be changed from
the first Saturday in November to the
last Saturday in October.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this permanent rule to be so minimal
that a full Regulatory Evaluation under
the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this regulation prevents
traffic from transiting a segment of Spa
Creek during the event, the impact of
this regulation will not be significant
due to the limited duration that the
regulated area will be in effect and the
extensive advance notifications that will
be made to the maritime community via
marine information broadcasts, local
radio stations and area newspapers so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61035
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit this section
of Spa Creek during the event.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This rule will be in
effect for only a short period, from 9:30
a.m. to 12 p.m. on October 29, 2005, and
annually thereafter from 10:30 a.m. to
2:30 p.m. on the first Saturday in
November. Although the regulated area
will apply to the entire width of Spa
Creek, traffic may be allowed to pass
through the regulated area with the
permission of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander. Before the enforcement
period, we will issue maritime
advisories so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
the address listed under ADDRESSES. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
61036
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 202 / Thursday, October 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:59 Oct 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
Energy Effects
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
Technical Standards
(a) Regulated area. A regulated area is
established for the waters of Spa Creek
from shoreline to shoreline, extending
400 feet from either side of a rope
spanning Spa Creek from a position at
latitude 38°58′36.9″ N, longitude
076°29′03.8″ W on the Annapolis
shoreline to a position at latitude
38°58′26.4″ N, longitude 076°28′53.7″ W
on the Eastport shoreline. All
coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
on board and displaying a Coast Guard
ensign.
(3) Participant means all vessels
participating in the ‘‘Tug of War’’ under
the auspices of the Marine Event Permit
issued to the event sponsor and
approved by Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore.
(c) Special Local Regulations: (1) No
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area unless participating
in the event or authorized by the Patrol
Commander. The Patrol Commander
may intermittently authorize general
navigation to pass through the regulated
area. Notice of these opportunities will
be given via marine safety radio
broadcast on VHF–FM marine band
radio, channel 16 (156.8 MHz) and
channel 22 (157.1 MHz).
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol
and then proceed only as directed.
(ii) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Official Patrol.
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a
regatta or marine event permit are
specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under those
sections. Under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are not required for this
rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233, Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
I
2. Add § 100.534 to read as follows:
§ 100.534, Tug-of-War; Spa Creek,
Annapolis, Maryland.
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 202 / Thursday, October 20, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced annually from 10:30
a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the first Saturday
in November. In 2005 the section will be
enforced from 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. on
October 29, instead of the first Saturday
in November.
Dated: October 11, 2005.
S. Ratti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth
Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. 05–21018 Filed 10–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 668, 674, 682, and 685
Federal Student Aid Programs
(Student Assistance General
Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan
Program, Federal Direct Loan Program,
Federal Family Education Loan
Program)
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice extending the expiration
date for the waivers and modifications
of statutory and regulatory provisions
pursuant to the Higher Education Relief
Opportunities for Students (HEROES)
Act of 2003, Public Law 108–76.
AGENCY:
We extend the expiration date
for the waivers and modifications of
statutory and regulatory provisions
issued by the Secretary pursuant to the
HEROES Act of 2003 and announced in
a notice published in the Federal
Register on December 12, 2003 (68 FR
69312).
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 30, 2005.
The waivers and modifications
announced in the December 12, 2003
Federal Register notice expire on
September 30, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wendy Macias, Office of Postsecondary
Education, U.S. Department of
Education, 1990 K Street, NW., room
8017, Washington, DC 20006–8544.
Telephone: (202) 502–7526 or by e-mail:
wendy.macias@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact person
listed in this section.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:59 Oct 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
In
accordance with the requirements of the
HEROES Act of 2003, on December 12,
2003, the Secretary announced in a
notice published in the Federal
Register, the waivers or modifications of
statutory or regulatory provisions that
were appropriate to assist individuals
who are applicants and recipients of
student financial assistance under Title
IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965,
as amended (HEA), and who—
• Are serving on active duty during a
war or other military operation or
national emergency;
• Are performing qualifying National
Guard duty during a war or other
military operation or national
emergency;
• Reside or are employed in an area
that is declared a disaster area by any
Federal, State, or local official in
connection with a national emergency;
or
• Suffered direct economic hardship
as a direct result of a war or other
military operation or national
emergency, as determined by the
Secretary.
Under the terms of the HEROES Act
of 2003, these waivers and
modifications were scheduled to expire
on September 30, 2005. However, on
September 30, 2005, the President
signed into law Pub. L. 109–78, which
extended the expiration date of the
HEROES Act of 2003, from September
30, 2005 to September 30, 2007. As a
result, we are extending the waivers and
modifications announced in the
December 12, 2003, Federal Register
notice through September 30, 2007.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You may view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.htm1.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers: 84.007 Federal Supplemental
Educational Opportunity Grant Program;
84.032 Federal Family Education Loan
Program; 84.032 Federal PLUS Program;
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61037
84.033 Federal Work Study Program; 84.038
Federal Perkins Loan Program; and 84.268
William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan
Program.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1071, 1082,
1087a, 1087aa, Pub. L. 108–76, Pub. L. 109–
78.
Dated: October 14, 2005.
Sally L. Stroup,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
[FR Doc. 05–21012 Filed 10–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
Address Visibility on Bundles of FlatSize and Irregular Parcel Mail
Postal Service.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal ServiceTM is
adopting new mailing standards to
ensure that address and presort
information on bundles of flat-size and
irregular parcel mail remains visible and
readable during processing. The new
standards apply only to bundles of
Periodicals, Standard Mail, and Package
Services mail intended for processing
on our Automated Package Processing
System equipment.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 27, 2005.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bill
Chatfield, Mailing Standards, U.S.
Postal Service, at (202) 268–7278 or
Susan Hawes, Operational
Requirements and Integration, U.S.
Postal Service, at (202) 268–8980.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Postal Service uses automated
equipment whenever possible to reduce
mail processing costs and help maintain
stable postage rates. Our new
Automated Package Processing System
(APPS) for bundles of flat-size and
irregular parcel mail has optical
character reader (OCR) technology,
enabling it to read delivery information
and process mail more efficiently. APPS
will replace many of our small parcel
and bundle sorters.
We published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register on September 2, 2004
(69 FR 53666), concerning address
visibility on bundles of flat-size and
irregular parcel mail. Our proposed rule
included the following changes in
mailing standards for bundles of
Periodicals, Standard Mail, and Package
Services mailpieces intended for
processing on APPS equipment:
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 202 (Thursday, October 20, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61034-61037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21018]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05-05-104]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Spa Creek,
Annapolis, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On September 1, 2005, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register requesting public
comments regarding establishment of permanent special local regulations
for ``Tug-of-War'', a marine event conducted over the waters of Spa
Creek between Eastport and Annapolis, Maryland. These special local
regulations are necessary to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. This action is intended to restrict
vessel traffic in portions of Spa Creek during the event.
DATES: Effective October 20, 2005. For 2005 only, this rule is enforced
from 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. on October 29, 2005. Thereafter, this rule
will be enforced annually from 10:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the first
Saturday in November.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket CGD05-05-104 and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (oax), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford
Street, Portsmouth, Virginia
[[Page 61035]]
23704-5004, between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis M. Sens, Project Manager,
Auxiliary and Recreational Boating Safety Branch, at (757) 398-6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On September 1, 2005, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Spa
Creek, Annapolis, MD'' in the Federal Register (70 FR 52054). We
received no letters commenting on the proposed rule. The Coast Guard
did receive telephonic comments from the Annapolis Harbormaster. No
public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying its effective date would
be contrary to public interest, since immediate action is needed to
protect event participations, spectator craft and other vessels
transiting the event area. However advance notifications will be made
to affected waterway users via marine information broadcasts, local
radio stations and area newspapers.
Background and Purpose
On October 29, 2005, the City of Annapolis will sponsor the ``Tug-
of-War'', across the waters of Spa Creek between Eastport and
Annapolis, Maryland. The event will consist of a tug of war between
teams on the Eastport side of Spa Creek pulling against teams on the
Annapolis side of Spa Creek. The opposing teams will pull a floating
rope approximately 1700 feet in length, spanning Spa Creek. A fleet of
spectator vessels is anticipated to gather nearby to view the
competition. Due to the need for vessel control while the rope is
spanned across Spa Creek, vessel traffic will be temporarily restricted
to provide for the safety of participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
One comment was received in response to the notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register.
The Coast Guard received comment from the Annapolis, MD
Harbormaster that recommended a change in the times of the event
scheduled for October 29, 2005 than previously announced in the notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that was published on September 1, 2005.
This final rule will change the time of the special local regulations.
For 2005 only, this special local regulation will be enforced from 9:30
a.m. until 12 p.m. on October 29, 2005.
The Coast Guard has modified the time of the event to accommodate
local waterway users. Accordingly, the Coast Guard is establishing
permanent special local regulations on specified waters of Spa Creek.
The regulated area will include a 400 foot buffer on either side of the
rope that spans Spa Creek from shoreline to shoreline.
This rule will be enforced annually from 10:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on
the first Saturday in November and will restrict general navigation in
the regulated area during the event. Except for participants and
vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or
vessel shall enter or remain in the regulated area. The Coast Guard
Patrol Commander may stop the event to allow vessels to transit the
regulated area.
For 2005 only, the enforcement period of the regulation will be
changed from the first Saturday in November to the last Saturday in
October.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this permanent rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting a segment
of Spa Creek during the event, the impact of this regulation will not
be significant due to the limited duration that the regulated area will
be in effect and the extensive advance notifications that will be made
to the maritime community via marine information broadcasts, local
radio stations and area newspapers so mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit this section of Spa Creek during the event.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will be in effect for only a short period, from 9:30 a.m. to 12
p.m. on October 29, 2005, and annually thereafter from 10:30 a.m. to
2:30 p.m. on the first Saturday in November. Although the regulated
area will apply to the entire width of Spa Creek, traffic may be
allowed to pass through the regulated area with the permission of the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Before the enforcement period, we will
issue maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the address listed under
ADDRESSES. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork
[[Page 61036]]
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special local regulations issued in
conjunction with a regatta or marine event permit are specifically
excluded from further analysis and documentation under those sections.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233, Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 100.534 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.534, Tug-of-War; Spa Creek, Annapolis, Maryland.
(a) Regulated area. A regulated area is established for the waters
of Spa Creek from shoreline to shoreline, extending 400 feet from
either side of a rope spanning Spa Creek from a position at latitude
38[deg]58[min]36.9[sec] N, longitude 076[deg]29[min]03.8[sec] W on the
Annapolis shoreline to a position at latitude 38[deg]58[min]26.4[sec]
N, longitude 076[deg]28[min]53.7[sec] W on the Eastport shoreline. All
coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(3) Participant means all vessels participating in the ``Tug of
War'' under the auspices of the Marine Event Permit issued to the event
sponsor and approved by Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(c) Special Local Regulations: (1) No person or vessel may enter or
remain in the regulated area unless participating in the event or
authorized by the Patrol Commander. The Patrol Commander may
intermittently authorize general navigation to pass through the
regulated area. Notice of these opportunities will be given via marine
safety radio broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio, channel 16 (156.8
MHz) and channel 22 (157.1 MHz).
(2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by any
Official Patrol and then proceed only as directed.
(ii) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Official Patrol.
[[Page 61037]]
(iii) When authorized to transit the regulated area, all vessels
shall proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced annually from
10:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the first Saturday in November. In 2005 the
section will be enforced from 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. on October 29,
instead of the first Saturday in November.
Dated: October 11, 2005.
S. Ratti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District,
Acting.
[FR Doc. 05-21018 Filed 10-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P