Publication of Families First Business Rules, 60797-60798 [05-20900]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2005 / Notices
turtles annually. The applicant would
sample turtles captured incidentally
during other activities including the
shark gillnet fishery, longline fisheries,
the shrimp trawl fishery, and surveys
during oil/gas platform removal. The
capture would be authorized by the
incidental take statements of the
biological opinions that cover these
activities. The research would provide
data on the turtles that interact with
these activities and provide data useful
to better understanding turtle migration,
habitat use, genetics, and population
dynamics. The information would be
used to develop, implement, and
evaluate conservation recovery efforts
for sea turtles. The research would take
place in Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico,
Caribbean Sea, and tributaries. The
permit would be issued for 5 years.
Dated: October 13, 2005.
Carrie W. Hubard,
Acting Chief, Permits, Conservation and
Education Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–20894 Filed 10–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Publication of Families First Business
Rules
Department of the Army, DOD.
Final notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Military Surface
Deployment and Distribution Command
(SDDC), as the Department of Defense
(DoD) Traffic Manager for the Personal
Property Program published the Defense
Personal Property System (DPS) Phase II
Business Rules for Industry comment.
These rules were posted to the Families
First Web Site located at https://
www.sddc.army.mil under Families
First.
This announcement is being made to
provide an overview of the comments
received by SDDC from the Federal
Register notice published on April 26,
2005 (70 FR 21401). All stakeholders
were given 30 days to review these draft
business rules and provide SDDC their
comments. Responses were returned in
several ways, including letters,
spreadsheets and the Frequently Asked
Question process.
SDDC received approximately 1300
comments from the industry. Some of
the comments were unique, but there
were many duplicates.
After the initial review of the
comments and identification of
duplicates, the comments were assigned
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:50 Oct 18, 2005
Jkt 208001
to SDDC Subject Matter Experts (SME)
in each of the associated Functional
Areas related to the development of
DPS. These SME’s performed a detailed
review of these comments to determine
if revision to the business rules were
appropriate.
Our review indicated that there were
approximately 800 duplicates and 500
unique comments. Some of industries
major concerns were: the new best value
traffic distribution methodology,
establishment of minimum performance
score, claims metrics, issues with CWA/
invoicing, prompt payment, hard copy
documentation, low response customer
survey response rate, lack of statistically
valid number of Transportation Service
Providers (TSPs), non-availability of
interface with TSP systems, 13% cost
growth limitation on the new program,
access to rate filing instructions, tools
required to perform rate filing,
inadequate time to test the new system,
shipment management, TSP/agent
relationship and access to multiple
SCACs.
Our review indicated that all the
comments required clarification to the
business rules. SDDC is currently in the
process of providing these clarifications
in the business rules and will publish
the Final Business Rule when
incorporation of these changes is
completed. In the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section, SDDC has
identified Industry’s major concerns.
ADDRESSES: Surface Deployment and
Distribution Command, ATTN: SDPP,
Room 10N35–29 (Judith Tarbox),
Hoffman Building II, 200 Stovall Street,
Alexandria, VA 22332–5000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Judith Tarbox at (703) 428–3004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Industry’s
comments ranged from questions,
suggestions, rewording of business rules
and requesting of additional
information. SDDC will continue to
work with Industry to clarify
interpretations of the program and
develop the understanding necessary to
make the implementation of DPS a
success. During the review of these
comments, several consistent themes
emerged, including:
1. Requests for the release of SDDC
proprietary information. As part of
developing rules/logic for DPS; SDDC
has developed several DoD specific
logic, formulas, and additional
information to assist our System
Integrator (SI) to implement our new
Personal Property System. For example,
some of the logic involves computation
of targets per market to keep the
program cost growth under 13% etc.
This is DoD specific proprietary
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60797
information and is therefore acquisition
sensitive thus cannot be released
outside DoD.
2. Questions that SDDC believes have
already been addressed. Many of the
industry’s comments are addressed in
other sections of the business rules or
other business rules documents. For
example, distribution of shipments,
spread and blackout dates, filing and
settlement of claims, new rate filing
process and timeline etc.
3. Recurring questions. Several unique
questions were asked by Industry, but
most of these questions were recurring
questions from the past two years that
have been previously responded to by
SDDC. SDDC believes that these
questions reveal areas where Industry
may need more information, and SDDC
will provide responses as part of the
FAQ section of the Families First Web
site. Additionally, topics of some of
these questions will be considered for
future Families First info-grams.
4. Documentation Edits and Changes.
Industry identified areas in the
documentation where editorial changes
or updates to the documentation are
necessary that are not related to the
content of the Business Rules. Where
applicable, SDDC will make all
appropriate updates to the
documentation to correct these items.
For example: mileage guide reference in
the new domestic 400NG tariff, business
rules and international tender language
changes for clarity and some changes to
footnotes in the business rules and cross
referencing of business rules etc.
5. Industry opinion. In many cases
Industry reiterated opinions and
concerns with regards to the Families
First Program. SDDC continues to
provide a monthly In-Process Review
(IPR) to the Industry to discuss these
concerns and work towards a better
understanding and resolution of issues.
6. Business Rules Changes. In some
cases, Industry identified perceived
gaps in the business rules or divergent
business rule explanations in the
documentation. In such cases SDDC will
work to provide clarification to the
business rule document. For example:
Historical tonnage will be provided to
all DoD qualified TSPs per market.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action is not considered rule
making within the meaning of
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. 3051 et seq., does not apply
because no information collection or
record keeping requirements are
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
60798
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2005 / Notices
imposed on contractors, offerors or
members of the public.
Steven L. Amato,
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Air Force, Deputy
Chief of Staff for Passenger and Personal
Property.
[FR Doc. 05–20900 Filed 10–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
Baltimore District has prepared a Final
General Reevaluation Report (GRR) and
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS) for the Poplar Island
Environmental Restoration Project
(PIERP). The GRR/SEIS evaluated the
vertical and/or lateral expansion of the
PIERP, design modifications to the
existing project, the addition of
recreational/educational opportunities
to the existing project, and the potential
to accept dredged material from
additional channels not specified in the
1996 EIS for the existing project. A
Notice of Availability (NOA) for the
Draft GRR/SEIS was published by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) in the Federal Register on June
22, 2005 (70 FR 36129).
The preferred alternative includes a
northern lateral expansion consisting of
approximately 575 acres, which would
include wetland and upland habitat,
and a protected open water embayment;
construction of a 5-ft vertical raising of
the existing upland Cells 2 and 6 at the
PIERP; amending the existing project
authorization and Project Cooperation
Agreement to include the placement of
dredged material from the southern
approach channels to the Chesapeake
and Delaware (C&D) Canal;
incorporation of design modifications
required for the completion of the
existing project, and development of
recreational and educational
enhancement for the PIERP.
DATES: USACE filed the final document
with EPA on September 30, 2005. EPA
published a Notice of Availability in the
14:50 Oct 18, 2005
Jkt 208001
U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore
District, Attn: Mr. Mark Medelsohn,
CENAB–PL–P, P.O. Box 1715,
Baltimore, MD 21203–1715 or
electronically at
mark.mendelsohn@usace.army.mil or
by telephone at (410) 962–9499 or (800)
295–1610.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PIERP is
located in the Chesapeake Bay,
approximately 39 miles south-southeast
of the Port of Baltimore, and two miles
northwest of Tilghman Island in Talbot
County, MD. Approximately 10,000
acres of remote island habitat has been
lost throughtout the Chesapeake Bay in
the last 150 years. Dredged material
from the Upper Chesapeake Bay
Approach Channels to the Port of
Balitmore is being beneficially used to
restore 1,140 acres of wetland and
upland habitat (approximately 570 acres
of wetland habitat and 570 acres of
upland habitat), and it is estimated that
by 2014 the PIERP will provide up to 40
million cubic yards (mcy) of dredged
material placement capacity. To date,
approximately 12 mcy of dredged
material have been placed at the site.
Construction and site operation at the
PIERP is a collaborative effort that is
cost shared between the Federal
sponsor, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers—Baltimore District and the
non-Federal sponsor, Maryland Port
Administration (MPA).
To address a predicted dredged
material placement capacity shortfall,
USACE-Baltimore and MPA initiated
the Poplar Island Expansion Study
(PIES) under the existing PIERP
Congressional Authorization, Section
537 of the Water Resources
Development Act (WRDA) of 1996.
Authorization for ecosystem restoration
projects using dredged material is
included in Section 204 of the WRDA of
1992, as amended by Section 207 of the
WRDA of 1996. A Notice of Intent (NOI)
to initiate the preparation of the GRR/
SEIS was published in the Federal
Register in June 2003 (68 FR 33685).
The Final Integrated GRR/SEIS
documents NEPA compliance for the
proposed expansion of the PIERP,
provides information specific to the
actions of the GRR, and supplements the
Poplar Island Restoration Study,
Maryland: Integrated Feasibility Report
and Environmental Impact Statement
(ERP No. D–COE–D350557–MD)
(USACE/MPA, 1996).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Final General
Reevaluation Report and Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Poplar Island Environmental
Restoration Project, Talbot County, MD
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register on October 7, 2005 (70
FR 58700). A Record of Decision may be
signed no earlier than 30 days after the
EPA notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Public meetings on the draft
document were held on July 19, 2005,
in Easton Maryland, and on July 20,
2005, at Tilghman, Maryland. Both
meetings provided an opportunity for
the public to present oral and/or written
comments.
You may view the Final GRR/SEIS
and related information on our Web
page at: https://
www.nab.usace.army.mil./projects/
Maryland/PoplarIsland/expansion.html.
The Final and Draft GRR/SEIS have
been prepared in accordance with (1)
NEPA of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), and
(3) USACE regulations implementing
NEPA (ER–200–2–2).
Mark Mendelsohn,
Study Manager.
[FR Doc. 05–20902 Filed 10–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–41–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Dredged Material Management Plan for
the Lower Atchafalaya, Bayous Chene,
Boeuf, and Black Navigation Channel,
and the Gulf of Mexico, in Assumption,
St. Mary, and Terrebone Parishes in
the Vicinity of Morgan City, LA
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Vicksburg District Corps
of Engineers is preparing the Dredged
Material Management Plan (DMMP) for
the existing Atchafalaya River and
Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black,
Louisiana, navigation project. The
DMMP will require a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS)
No. 3 to the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) for the Atchafalaya
River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and
Black, Louisiana (March 1973),
navigation project. The project was
authorized by the River and Harbor Act
of 1968 in accordance with House
Document 155, 90th Congress, 1st
Session. The purpose of the DMMP is to
develop a long term management
strategy to accomplish the placement of
dredged material associated with the
navigation project in the least costly
manner, that is consistent with sound
engineering practice, and that meets all
applicable Federal environmental laws.
The Atchafalaya River and Bayous
Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana,
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60797-60798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20900]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Publication of Families First Business Rules
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.
ACTION: Final notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
(SDDC), as the Department of Defense (DoD) Traffic Manager for the
Personal Property Program published the Defense Personal Property
System (DPS) Phase II Business Rules for Industry comment. These rules
were posted to the Families First Web Site located at https://
www.sddc.army.mil under Families First.
This announcement is being made to provide an overview of the
comments received by SDDC from the Federal Register notice published on
April 26, 2005 (70 FR 21401). All stakeholders were given 30 days to
review these draft business rules and provide SDDC their comments.
Responses were returned in several ways, including letters,
spreadsheets and the Frequently Asked Question process.
SDDC received approximately 1300 comments from the industry. Some
of the comments were unique, but there were many duplicates.
After the initial review of the comments and identification of
duplicates, the comments were assigned to SDDC Subject Matter Experts
(SME) in each of the associated Functional Areas related to the
development of DPS. These SME's performed a detailed review of these
comments to determine if revision to the business rules were
appropriate.
Our review indicated that there were approximately 800 duplicates
and 500 unique comments. Some of industries major concerns were: the
new best value traffic distribution methodology, establishment of
minimum performance score, claims metrics, issues with CWA/invoicing,
prompt payment, hard copy documentation, low response customer survey
response rate, lack of statistically valid number of Transportation
Service Providers (TSPs), non-availability of interface with TSP
systems, 13% cost growth limitation on the new program, access to rate
filing instructions, tools required to perform rate filing, inadequate
time to test the new system, shipment management, TSP/agent
relationship and access to multiple SCACs.
Our review indicated that all the comments required clarification
to the business rules. SDDC is currently in the process of providing
these clarifications in the business rules and will publish the Final
Business Rule when incorporation of these changes is completed. In the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section, SDDC has identified Industry's major
concerns.
ADDRESSES: Surface Deployment and Distribution Command, ATTN: SDPP,
Room 10N35-29 (Judith Tarbox), Hoffman Building II, 200 Stovall Street,
Alexandria, VA 22332-5000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Judith Tarbox at (703) 428-3004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Industry's comments ranged from questions,
suggestions, rewording of business rules and requesting of additional
information. SDDC will continue to work with Industry to clarify
interpretations of the program and develop the understanding necessary
to make the implementation of DPS a success. During the review of these
comments, several consistent themes emerged, including:
1. Requests for the release of SDDC proprietary information. As
part of developing rules/logic for DPS; SDDC has developed several DoD
specific logic, formulas, and additional information to assist our
System Integrator (SI) to implement our new Personal Property System.
For example, some of the logic involves computation of targets per
market to keep the program cost growth under 13% etc. This is DoD
specific proprietary information and is therefore acquisition sensitive
thus cannot be released outside DoD.
2. Questions that SDDC believes have already been addressed. Many
of the industry's comments are addressed in other sections of the
business rules or other business rules documents. For example,
distribution of shipments, spread and blackout dates, filing and
settlement of claims, new rate filing process and timeline etc.
3. Recurring questions. Several unique questions were asked by
Industry, but most of these questions were recurring questions from the
past two years that have been previously responded to by SDDC. SDDC
believes that these questions reveal areas where Industry may need more
information, and SDDC will provide responses as part of the FAQ section
of the Families First Web site. Additionally, topics of some of these
questions will be considered for future Families First info-grams.
4. Documentation Edits and Changes. Industry identified areas in
the documentation where editorial changes or updates to the
documentation are necessary that are not related to the content of the
Business Rules. Where applicable, SDDC will make all appropriate
updates to the documentation to correct these items. For example:
mileage guide reference in the new domestic 400NG tariff, business
rules and international tender language changes for clarity and some
changes to footnotes in the business rules and cross referencing of
business rules etc.
5. Industry opinion. In many cases Industry reiterated opinions and
concerns with regards to the Families First Program. SDDC continues to
provide a monthly In-Process Review (IPR) to the Industry to discuss
these concerns and work towards a better understanding and resolution
of issues.
6. Business Rules Changes. In some cases, Industry identified
perceived gaps in the business rules or divergent business rule
explanations in the documentation. In such cases SDDC will work to
provide clarification to the business rule document. For example:
Historical tonnage will be provided to all DoD qualified TSPs per
market.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action is not considered rule making within the meaning of
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3051 et seq., does not apply
because no information collection or record keeping requirements are
[[Page 60798]]
imposed on contractors, offerors or members of the public.
Steven L. Amato,
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Air Force, Deputy Chief of Staff for Passenger
and Personal Property.
[FR Doc. 05-20900 Filed 10-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M