Prescription Drug User Fee Act; Public Meeting, 60536-60538 [05-20875]
Download as PDF
60536
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 18, 2005 / Notices
educational measures in the Head Start
Program. This includes the Head Start
National Reporting System (NRS). The
Committee is to provide
recommendations for integrating NRS
with other ongoing assessments of the
effectiveness of the program. The
Committee will make recommendations
as to how NRS and other assessment
data can be included in the broader
Head Start measurement efforts found in
the Family and Child Experiences
Survey (FACES), the national Head Start
Impact Study, Head Start’s Performance
Based Outcome System and the ongoing
evaluation of the Early Head Start
program.
Date: November 1, 2005, 8:30 a.m.–
5:30 p.m. (Dinner Recess). November 2,
2005, 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m.
Place: The Beacon Hotel, 1615 Rhode
Island Ave, NW., Washington, DC
20036.
Agenda: The Committee will hear
presentations related to existing Head
Start evaluations and NRS
implementation and will continue the
discussions begun at the first meeting in
June 2005.
This, the
second meeting of the Committee, is
open to the public. Persons wishing to
bring written statements or papers
focused on relevant, existing research
with Head Start populations or on
measures appropriate for low-income
four- and five-year-old children are
welcome to do so. Individuals may email such documents to
Secretaryadvisory-hs@esi-dc.com or
mail to: ESI, ATTN: Xzavier Wright,
Head Start Bureau—Secretary’s
Advisory Committee, 7735 Old
Georgetown Road, Suite 600, Bethesda,
Maryland 20814.
Documents received shall be
presented to the Committee.
The Committee meeting records shall
be kept at the Aerospace Center located
at 901 D Street, SW., Washington, DC
20447. The Head Start Bureau will also
make material related to this meeting
available on the Head Start Web site
https://www2.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/
hsb/.
An interpreter for the deaf and hard
of hearing will be available upon
advance request by contacting
xzavier@esi-dc.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005N–0410]
Prescription Drug User Fee Act; Public
Meeting
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing a
public meeting on the Prescription Drug
User Fee Act (PDUFA). The legislative
authority for PDUFA expires in
September 2007. Without further
legislation, we will no longer be able to
collect user fees for the prescription
drug program and resources critical to
running the program would become
unavailable to us. We invite public
comment on the PDUFA program and
suggestions regarding what features we
should propose for the next PDUFA
program.
The public meeting will be held
on November 14, 2005, from 9 a.m. to
5 p.m. Registration to attend the meeting
must be received by October 31, 2005.
You may register electronically at
CBERTraningSuggestions@cber.fda.gov.
Walk-in registration at the meeting site
will also be accepted. Submit written
comments by December 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Natcher Conference Center, National
Institutes of Health, Bldg. 45, Center Dr.,
9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD
20815. Parking is limited, and there may
be delays entering the NIH campus due
to increased security. All visitors’
vehicles will be inspected, and visitors
must show one form of identification
(ID) (such as a government-issued photo
ID, driver’s license, passport, etc.) We
recommend arriving by subway
(Metrorail) if possible. NIH is accessible
from the Metrorail’s ‘‘Red Line’’ at the
Medical Center/NIH station.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/
ecomments.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 4184–01–M
17:22 Oct 17, 2005
Jkt 208001
Notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY:
Naomi Goldstein,
Director, Office of Planning, Research and
Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 05–20758 Filed 10–17–05; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
PO 00000
For information regarding this notice:
Patricia A. Stewart, Office of Policy
and Planning (HFP–1), Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–
827–2647, FAX: 301–594–6777, email: Patricia.Stewart@oc.fda.gov.
For information regarding
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
registration: Melanie Whelan or
Kathy Eberhart, Office of
Communication, Training and
Manufacturers Assistance (HFM–
49), Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research, 1401 Rockville Pike,
suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852,
301–827–2000, FAX: 301–827–
3079.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
FDA is announcing its intention to
hold a public meeting on PDUFA. The
authority for PDUFA expires in
September 2007. Without further
legislation, FDA would no longer be
able to collect user fees for the
prescription drug program. Resources
critical to running the program would
become unavailable to FDA. We are now
considering what features we should
propose for the next PDUFA program.
We are convening a public meeting to
hear stakeholder views on this subject.
We are offering the following two
general questions for consideration, and
we are interested in responses to these
questions and any other pertinent
information stakeholders would like to
share:
1. What is your assessment of the
overall performance of the PDUFA
program thus far?
2. What aspects of PDUFA should be
retained, or what should be changed to
further strengthen and improve the
program?
We provide the following background
on the PDUFA program so potential
participants can better understand the
history and evolution of the PDFUA
program and its current status.
II. What is PDUFA? What Does It Do?
PDUFA, in broad terms, is a series of
laws that have authorized us to collect
fees from companies that produce
certain human drug and biological
products. The original PDUFA (PDUFA
I) was enacted in 1992 (as the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act, Public
Law 102–571) and had a 5-year life. In
1997, as PDUFA I expired, Congress
passed the FDA Modernization Act
(FDAMA, Public Law 105–115).
FDAMA included, among other things,
an extension of PDUFA (PDUFA II) for
an additional 5 years. In 2002, Congress
extended PDUFA again for 5 years
(PDUFA III) through the Public Health
Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness
and Response Act (Public Law 107–
188).
PDUFA’s original intent was to
provide additional revenues to us so
that we could hire more staff to improve
the process for the review of human
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
18OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 18, 2005 / Notices
drugs to make important drug therapies
available to patients sooner without
compromising review quality.
Under PDUFA, the industry provided
additional funds through user fees that
would be available to FDA, in addition
to appropriated funds, to spend on the
process for the review of human drugs.
Our authority to collect user fees is
‘‘triggered’’ only when a base amount of
appropriated funds, adjusted for
inflation, is spent.
In conjunction with PDUFA, we set
review performance goals that became
more stringent each year. These goals
applied to the review of original new
human drug and biological product
applications, resubmissions of original
applications, and supplements to
approved applications. During the first
few years of PDUFA I, we eliminated
backlogs of original applications and
supplements that had formed in earlier
years when the program had fewer
resources. Phased in over the 5 years of
PDUFA I, the goals were to review and
act on 90 percent of priority new drug
applications (NDAs), biologics license
applications (BLAs), and efficacy
supplements (i.e., submissions for
products providing significant
therapeutic gains) within 6 months of
submission of a complete application; to
review and act on 90 percent of
nonpriority original NDAs, BLAs, and
efficacy supplements within 12 months,
and on resubmissions and
manufacturing supplements within 6
months. Over the course of PDUFA I, we
exceeded all of these performance goals.
Under PDUFA II, some review
performance goals continued to shorten.
For example, by 2002, the PDUFA II
goals called on us to review and act on
90 percent of the following:
• Standard new drug and biological
product applications and efficacy
supplements within 10 months;
• Chemistry and Manufacturing
Control supplements requiring prior
FDA approval within 4 months; and
• Class 1 resubmissions (that respond
to relatively minor deficiencies such as
labeling changes) within 2 months.
In addition, PDUFA II added a new
set of procedural goals intended to
improve our interactions with industry
sponsors during the early years of drug
development. For example, these goals
called for us to meet with sponsors and
provide followup meeting minutes
within a certain number of days, and
provide responses to questions on
industry submitted special study
protocols within a certain number of
days.
We met or exceeded nearly all of our
goals for application review and for
these other procedures under PDUFA II.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Oct 17, 2005
Jkt 208001
Under PDUFA III, additional money
from user fees was authorized, and a
mechanism placed in the act to annually
account for increases in workload
associated with the process for the
review of human drugs. For the first
time, PDUFA III also authorized us to
spend user fee funds on certain aspects
of postmarket risk management. The
review performance and procedural
goals associated with PDUFA III were
similar to those under PDUFA II for
fiscal year (FY) 2002 performance
levels, but the PDUFA III program
addressed drug safety issues and
established several new initiatives to
improve application submissions and
agency-sponsor interactions during drug
development and application review.
The goals under PDUFA III also
included new provisions, for example,
to develop guidance for industry on
good risk assessment, risk management,
and pharmacovigilance practices, to
fund outside expert consultants to help
evaluate and improve review
management processes, and to
centralize accountability and funding
for all PDUFA information technology
initiatives and activities.
Furthermore, in conjunction with
PDUFA’s reauthorization in 2002, we
committed to the creation of a guidance
for our review staff and industry on
good review management principles and
practices as they apply to the first cycle
review of NDAs, BLAs, and efficacy
supplements, and we announced the
guidance’s availability in the Federal
Register of March 31, 2005 (70 FR
16507). We also set a goal of testing
whether providing early review of
selected applications and additional
feedback and advice to sponsors during
drug development for selected products
can shorten drug development and
review times. There were two
continuous marketing application
(CMA) pilot programs; CMA Pilot 1
provides for the review of a limited
number of presubmitted portions of
NDAs and BLAs. Under CMA Pilot 2,
FDA and applicants can enter into
agreements to engage in frequent
scientific feedback and interactions
during the investigational new drug
phase of product development. The
first-cycle and CMA initiatives are
currently being evaluated to determine
their impact on the effectiveness and
efficiency of FDA-sponsor
communications, product development,
and regulatory review.
We have published a number of
reports that may help inform the public
about PDUFA and its implementation.
Key Federal Register documents, such
as, PDUFA-related guidances,
legislation, performance reports, and
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60537
financial reports, can be found at https://
www.fda.gov/oc/pdufa/ and
www.fda.gov/cder/pdufa. We may make
additional information about PDUFA
available on our Web site at https://
www.fda.gov/oc/pdufa. Additional
information about the activities of the
involved FDA product centers can be
found in the Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research 2004 Report to the Nation
(https://www.fda.gov/cder/reports/rtn/
2004/rtn2004.htm), and the Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research FY
2004 Annual Report (https://
www.fda.gov/cber/inside/annrpt.htm).
III. What Information Should You
Know About the Meeting?
A. When and Where Will the Meeting
Occur? What Format Will We Use?
Through this notice, we are
announcing that we will convene a
public meeting to hear stakeholder
views on what features we should
advance in proposing the PDUFA IV
program.
We will conduct the meeting on
November 14, 2005, at the Natcher
Conference Center, National Institutes of
Health (NIH) (see ADDRESSES). In
general, the meeting format will include
presentations by FDA and a series of
panels representing different
stakeholder interest groups (such as
patient advocates, consumer protection,
industry, health professionals, and
academic researchers). We will also
provide an opportunity for individuals
to make presentations at the meeting,
and for organizations and individuals to
submit written comments to the docket
after the meeting
B. What Questions Would We Like the
Public to Consider?
Please consider the following
questions for this meeting:
1. What is your assessment of the
overall performance of the PDUFA
program thus far?
2. What aspects of PDUFA should be
retained, or what should be changed to
further strengthen and improve the
program?
C. How Do You Register for the Meeting
or Submit Comments?
If you wish to attend and/or make a
presentation at the meeting, please send
an e-mail message to:
CBERTrainingSuggestions@cber.fda.gov
by October 31, 2005. Your e-mail should
include the following information:
Name, company, company address,
company phone number, and e-mail
address. You will receive a confirmation
within 2 business days.
We also will accept walk-in
registration at the meeting site, but
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
18OCN1
60538
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 18, 2005 / Notices
space is limited, and we will close
registration when maximum seating
capacity (approximately 500) is reached.
We will try to accommodate all
persons who wish to make a
presentation. The time allotted for
presentations may depend on the
number of persons who wish to speak.
If you require special
accommodations due to a disability,
please contact Patricia A. Stewart at
least 7 days in advance.
If you would like to submit comments
regarding PDUFA IV, please send your
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES). Submit a
single copy of electronic comments or
two paper copies of any written
comments, except that individuals may
submit one paper copy. Comments are
to be identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
D. Will Meeting Transcripts Be
Available?
We will prepare a meeting transcript,
and we will make the transcript
available on our Web site (https://
www.fda.gov) after the meeting. We
anticipate that transcripts will be
available approximately 30 working
days after the meeting. The transcript
will also be available for public
examination at the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES), between
9 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through
Friday.
Dated: October 12, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–20875 Filed 10–14–05; 8:57 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Submission for OMB Review,
Comment Request; 5 A Day
Customized Survey
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
requirement of Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
National Cancer Institute (NCI),
National Institutes of Health (NIH) will
publish periodic summaries of proposed
projects to be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval. The proposed
information collection below was
previously published in the Federal
Register on May 18, 2005, page 28544–
28545 and allowed 60-days for public
comment. No public comments were
received. The purpose of this notice is
to allow an additional 30 days for public
comment. The National Institutes of
Health may not conduct or sponsor, and
the respondent is not required to
respond to, an information collection
that has been extended, revised or
implemented after October 1, 1995,
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Proposed Collection: Title: 5 A Day
Customized Survey. Type of
Information Collection Request: New.
Need and Use of Information Collection:
The purpose of the 5 A Day Customized
Survey is to further the development of
standardized measures of consumer
knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors
regarding the consumption of fruits and
vegetables. Specifically, the Customized
Survey will allow for validation of the
new ‘‘cup’’ portion sizes (consistent
with the 2005 Dietary Guidelines) and
identify the most efficacious short
screener methods of fruit and vegetable
intake. In addition, the Customized
Survey will measure established
predictors of fruit and vegetable
consumption at the national level and
explore new predictors and constructs
not previously examined for fruit and
vegetable consumption. The sample will
be drawn from a consumer opinion
panel methodology using balancing
techniques to mirror the U.S. general
population on a set of key demographic
variables. A separate sample of African
Americans will be drawn from the
panel.
Prior to fielding the Customized
Survey, two pilot studies will be
completed as the first phase of this
research. Pilot respondents will be
drawn from the same consumer panel
and have similar demographics as
respondents in the main study. A brief
description of the two pilot studies
follows. In pilot study 1, respondents
will initially complete a brief screener
questionnaire, three 24-hour dietary
recalls over the phone, followed by the
Customized Survey by mail. To account
for diversity in eating habits, dietary
recalls will be obtained for 2 weekdays
and 1 weekend per respondent. The
recalls will be conducted via phone by
trained interviewers using the
University of Minnesota’s Nutrition
Data System (NDS). After completing
the dietary recalls pilot respondents will
be mailed the Customized Survey
within 2 weeks. Fruit and vegetable
consumption as assessed by the average
of the three 24-hour recalls will be
compared with the fruit and vegetable
consumption measures from the
Customized Survey. In pilot study 2,
respondents will complete the
Customized Survey by mail at two
points in time, six to eight weeks apart.
The analysis in pilot study 2 will focus
on a rigorous evaluation of the
psychometric properties of the
Customized Survey instrument to
ensure that item-level and instrumentlevel reliability and validity has been
achieved before proceeding to the main
data collection phase of the study.
Based on the findings of the pilot
studies, minor modifications may be
made to the Customized Survey prior to
the implementation of the main study.
Frequency of response: Main study, one
time response (5 A Day Customized
Survey). Pilot study 1, five times
(screener, three 24-hour dietary recalls,
5 A Day Customized Survey). Pilot
study 2, two times (5 A Day Customized
Survey at two points in time). Affected
Public: Individuals. Type of
Respondents: U.S. adults. The annual
reporting burden is as follows:
Estimated Number of Respondents:
5,875; Estimated Number of Responses
per Respondent: 1, 2 or 5; Average
Burden Hours per Response: .416; and
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours
Requested: 2,467.90. The annualized
cost to respondents is estimated at:
$46,384.28. The annual reporting
burden is summarized in exhibit 1
below. There are no Operating or
Maintenance Costs to report.
EXHIBIT 1
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents *
Pilot Study 1:
Screener ...................................................................................................
Dietary Recall 1 ........................................................................................
Dietary Recall 2 ........................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Oct 17, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Frequency of
response
480
380
325
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
1
1
1
18OCN1
Average
burden hours
.08
.50
.50
Annual hour
burden
38.4
190
162.5
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60536-60538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20875]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005N-0410]
Prescription Drug User Fee Act; Public Meeting
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public
meeting on the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA). The legislative
authority for PDUFA expires in September 2007. Without further
legislation, we will no longer be able to collect user fees for the
prescription drug program and resources critical to running the program
would become unavailable to us. We invite public comment on the PDUFA
program and suggestions regarding what features we should propose for
the next PDUFA program.
DATES: The public meeting will be held on November 14, 2005, from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. Registration to attend the meeting must be received by
October 31, 2005. You may register electronically at
CBERTraningSuggestions@cber.fda.gov. Walk-in registration at the
meeting site will also be accepted. Submit written comments by December
14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Natcher Conference Center,
National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 45, Center Dr., 9000 Rockville
Pike, Bethesda, MD 20815. Parking is limited, and there may be delays
entering the NIH campus due to increased security. All visitors'
vehicles will be inspected, and visitors must show one form of
identification (ID) (such as a government-issued photo ID, driver's
license, passport, etc.) We recommend arriving by subway (Metrorail) if
possible. NIH is accessible from the Metrorail's ``Red Line'' at the
Medical Center/NIH station.
Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to https://www.fda.gov/
dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For information regarding this notice: Patricia A. Stewart, Office
of Policy and Planning (HFP-1), Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-2647, FAX: 301-594-6777, e-
mail: Patricia.Stewart@oc.fda.gov.
For information regarding registration: Melanie Whelan or Kathy
Eberhart, Office of Communication, Training and Manufacturers
Assistance (HFM-49), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, 1401
Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-827-2000, FAX:
301-827-3079.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
FDA is announcing its intention to hold a public meeting on PDUFA.
The authority for PDUFA expires in September 2007. Without further
legislation, FDA would no longer be able to collect user fees for the
prescription drug program. Resources critical to running the program
would become unavailable to FDA. We are now considering what features
we should propose for the next PDUFA program. We are convening a public
meeting to hear stakeholder views on this subject. We are offering the
following two general questions for consideration, and we are
interested in responses to these questions and any other pertinent
information stakeholders would like to share:
1. What is your assessment of the overall performance of the PDUFA
program thus far?
2. What aspects of PDUFA should be retained, or what should be
changed to further strengthen and improve the program?
We provide the following background on the PDUFA program so
potential participants can better understand the history and evolution
of the PDFUA program and its current status.
II. What is PDUFA? What Does It Do?
PDUFA, in broad terms, is a series of laws that have authorized us
to collect fees from companies that produce certain human drug and
biological products. The original PDUFA (PDUFA I) was enacted in 1992
(as the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, Public Law 102-571) and had a
5-year life. In 1997, as PDUFA I expired, Congress passed the FDA
Modernization Act (FDAMA, Public Law 105-115). FDAMA included, among
other things, an extension of PDUFA (PDUFA II) for an additional 5
years. In 2002, Congress extended PDUFA again for 5 years (PDUFA III)
through the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act (Public Law 107-188).
PDUFA's original intent was to provide additional revenues to us so
that we could hire more staff to improve the process for the review of
human
[[Page 60537]]
drugs to make important drug therapies available to patients sooner
without compromising review quality.
Under PDUFA, the industry provided additional funds through user
fees that would be available to FDA, in addition to appropriated funds,
to spend on the process for the review of human drugs. Our authority to
collect user fees is ``triggered'' only when a base amount of
appropriated funds, adjusted for inflation, is spent.
In conjunction with PDUFA, we set review performance goals that
became more stringent each year. These goals applied to the review of
original new human drug and biological product applications,
resubmissions of original applications, and supplements to approved
applications. During the first few years of PDUFA I, we eliminated
backlogs of original applications and supplements that had formed in
earlier years when the program had fewer resources. Phased in over the
5 years of PDUFA I, the goals were to review and act on 90 percent of
priority new drug applications (NDAs), biologics license applications
(BLAs), and efficacy supplements (i.e., submissions for products
providing significant therapeutic gains) within 6 months of submission
of a complete application; to review and act on 90 percent of
nonpriority original NDAs, BLAs, and efficacy supplements within 12
months, and on resubmissions and manufacturing supplements within 6
months. Over the course of PDUFA I, we exceeded all of these
performance goals.
Under PDUFA II, some review performance goals continued to shorten.
For example, by 2002, the PDUFA II goals called on us to review and act
on 90 percent of the following:
Standard new drug and biological product applications and
efficacy supplements within 10 months;
Chemistry and Manufacturing Control supplements requiring
prior FDA approval within 4 months; and
Class 1 resubmissions (that respond to relatively minor
deficiencies such as labeling changes) within 2 months.
In addition, PDUFA II added a new set of procedural goals intended
to improve our interactions with industry sponsors during the early
years of drug development. For example, these goals called for us to
meet with sponsors and provide followup meeting minutes within a
certain number of days, and provide responses to questions on industry
submitted special study protocols within a certain number of days.
We met or exceeded nearly all of our goals for application review
and for these other procedures under PDUFA II.
Under PDUFA III, additional money from user fees was authorized,
and a mechanism placed in the act to annually account for increases in
workload associated with the process for the review of human drugs. For
the first time, PDUFA III also authorized us to spend user fee funds on
certain aspects of postmarket risk management. The review performance
and procedural goals associated with PDUFA III were similar to those
under PDUFA II for fiscal year (FY) 2002 performance levels, but the
PDUFA III program addressed drug safety issues and established several
new initiatives to improve application submissions and agency-sponsor
interactions during drug development and application review.
The goals under PDUFA III also included new provisions, for
example, to develop guidance for industry on good risk assessment, risk
management, and pharmacovigilance practices, to fund outside expert
consultants to help evaluate and improve review management processes,
and to centralize accountability and funding for all PDUFA information
technology initiatives and activities.
Furthermore, in conjunction with PDUFA's reauthorization in 2002,
we committed to the creation of a guidance for our review staff and
industry on good review management principles and practices as they
apply to the first cycle review of NDAs, BLAs, and efficacy
supplements, and we announced the guidance's availability in the
Federal Register of March 31, 2005 (70 FR 16507). We also set a goal of
testing whether providing early review of selected applications and
additional feedback and advice to sponsors during drug development for
selected products can shorten drug development and review times. There
were two continuous marketing application (CMA) pilot programs; CMA
Pilot 1 provides for the review of a limited number of presubmitted
portions of NDAs and BLAs. Under CMA Pilot 2, FDA and applicants can
enter into agreements to engage in frequent scientific feedback and
interactions during the investigational new drug phase of product
development. The first-cycle and CMA initiatives are currently being
evaluated to determine their impact on the effectiveness and efficiency
of FDA-sponsor communications, product development, and regulatory
review.
We have published a number of reports that may help inform the
public about PDUFA and its implementation. Key Federal Register
documents, such as, PDUFA-related guidances, legislation, performance
reports, and financial reports, can be found at https://www.fda.gov/oc/
pdufa/ and www.fda.gov/cder/pdufa. We may make additional information
about PDUFA available on our Web site at https://www.fda.gov/oc/pdufa.
Additional information about the activities of the involved FDA product
centers can be found in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
2004 Report to the Nation (https://www.fda.gov/cder/reports/rtn/2004/
rtn2004.htm), and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FY
2004 Annual Report (https://www.fda.gov/cber/inside/annrpt.htm).
III. What Information Should You Know About the Meeting?
A. When and Where Will the Meeting Occur? What Format Will We Use?
Through this notice, we are announcing that we will convene a
public meeting to hear stakeholder views on what features we should
advance in proposing the PDUFA IV program.
We will conduct the meeting on November 14, 2005, at the Natcher
Conference Center, National Institutes of Health (NIH) (see ADDRESSES).
In general, the meeting format will include presentations by FDA and a
series of panels representing different stakeholder interest groups
(such as patient advocates, consumer protection, industry, health
professionals, and academic researchers). We will also provide an
opportunity for individuals to make presentations at the meeting, and
for organizations and individuals to submit written comments to the
docket after the meeting
B. What Questions Would We Like the Public to Consider?
Please consider the following questions for this meeting:
1. What is your assessment of the overall performance of the PDUFA
program thus far?
2. What aspects of PDUFA should be retained, or what should be
changed to further strengthen and improve the program?
C. How Do You Register for the Meeting or Submit Comments?
If you wish to attend and/or make a presentation at the meeting,
please send an e-mail message to: CBERTrainingSuggestions@cber.fda.gov
by October 31, 2005. Your e-mail should include the following
information: Name, company, company address, company phone number, and
e-mail address. You will receive a confirmation within 2 business days.
We also will accept walk-in registration at the meeting site, but
[[Page 60538]]
space is limited, and we will close registration when maximum seating
capacity (approximately 500) is reached.
We will try to accommodate all persons who wish to make a
presentation. The time allotted for presentations may depend on the
number of persons who wish to speak.
If you require special accommodations due to a disability, please
contact Patricia A. Stewart at least 7 days in advance.
If you would like to submit comments regarding PDUFA IV, please
send your comments to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES). Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper
copies of any written comments, except that individuals may submit one
paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
D. Will Meeting Transcripts Be Available?
We will prepare a meeting transcript, and we will make the
transcript available on our Web site (https://www.fda.gov) after the
meeting. We anticipate that transcripts will be available approximately
30 working days after the meeting. The transcript will also be
available for public examination at the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES), between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Dated: October 12, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20875 Filed 10-14-05; 8:57 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S