Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wisconsin, 60037-60038 [05-20613]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Proposed Rules included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ´˜ Francisco Donez, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–3956, Donez.Francisco@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local rule: MBUAPCD 404. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are approving this local rule in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct final action. Dated: September 13, 2005. Laura Yoshii, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 05–20602 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [R05–OAR–2005–WI–0002; FRL–7974–5] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wisconsin Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP) for an VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:37 Oct 13, 2005 Jkt 208001 alternative volatile organic compounds (VOC) control device for Serigraph, Incorporated (Serigraph). On May 18, 2005, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources submitted a request to revise the Wisconsin SIP. The proposed revision approves Serigraph’s use of a biofilter to control VOC emissions from its printing facility in Washington County, Wisconsin. The biofilter system will reliably control emissions at or below the level of the control methods listed in the SIP. Serigraph has designed one of its plants as a permanent total enclosure (PTE), which captures all VOC emissions and routes them to the biofilter. There are no fugitive emissions from the plant. This reduces the total VOC emissions from Serigraph’s facility. In the final rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal, because EPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. We do not intend to take any further action in relation to this proposed rule unless we receive adverse comment this action. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will withdraw the direct final rule and will respond to all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 14, 2005. Submit comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID No. R05–OAR–2005– WI–0002 by one of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. Agency Web site: https:// docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA’s electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA’s preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov. Fax: (312) 886–5824. Mail: You may send written comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 60037 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Hand delivery: Deliver your comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office’s normal hours of operation. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R05–OAR–2005–WI–0002. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and the Federal regulations.gov Web site are ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I(B) of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the RME index at https://www.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in RME or in hard copy at Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, E:\FR\FM\14OCP1.SGM 14OCP1 60038 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Proposed Rules Illinois 60604. Please telephone Matt Rau at (312) 886–6524 before visiting the Region 5 Office. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), USEPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6524. Rau.matthew@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives. g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats. h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. I. General Information A. Does This Action Apply to Me? B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA? II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the Corresponding Direct Final Rule? EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Wisconsin VOC SIP for Serigraph. The revision approves Serigraph’s use of a biofilter to control VOC emissions from several lines in Plant 2 at its facility. This is an alternative to the controls listed in the SIP. Section NR 422.04(2)(d) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code allows an alternative control method that is demonstrated to reliably control emissions to a level at or below the applicable SIP limit and is approved by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. The biofilter will reliably control VOC emissions at a level in line with other control techniques for surface printing facilities. An eighty percent overall control efficiency for VOC emissions is required for a control device. Overall control efficiency includes both capture and destruction efficiencies. Plant 2 is designed as a PTE ensuring all the emissions are captured and exhausted into the biofilter. Serigraph has operated its biofilter since May 1997. An average of 54 tons of VOC emissions are vented to the biofilter each year. The average exhaust from the biofilter is about 8 tons of VOC per year. This comfortably exceeds the control requirement. I. General Information A. Does This Action Apply to Me? This action applies to a single source, Serigraph, Incorporated of Washington County, Wisconsin. B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI to EPA through RME, regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, remember to: a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number). b. Follow directions—The agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number. c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes. d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/ or data that you used. e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:37 Oct 13, 2005 Jkt 208001 II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the Corresponding Direct Final Rule? For additional information, see the Direct Final Rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. Copies of the request and the EPA’s analysis are available electronically at RME or in hard copy at the above address. Please telephone Matt Rau at (312) 886–6524 before visiting the Region 5 Office. Dated: September 15, 2005. Bharat Mathur, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 05–20613 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families 45 CFR Parts 302, 303 and 307 State Parent Locator Service; Safeguarding Child Support Information Administration for Children and Families, Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE). ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) created and expanded State and Federal title IV–D child support enforcement databases and significantly enhanced access to information for title IV–D child support purposes. States are moving toward integrated service delivery and developing enterprise architecture initiatives to link their program databases. This proposed rule is designed to prescribe requirements for: State Parent Locator Service responses to authorized location requests; and State IV–D agency safeguarding of confidential information and authorized disclosures of this information. This proposed rule would restrict the use of confidential data and information to child support purposes, with exceptions for certain disclosures permitted by statute. Consideration will be given to comments received by December 13, 2005. DATES: Send comments to: Office of Child Support Enforcement, Administration for Children and Families, 370 L’Enfant Promenade, SW., 4th floor, Washington, DC 20447. Attention: Director, Policy Division, Mail Stop: OCSE/DP. Comments will be available for public inspection Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on the 4th floor of the Department’s offices at the above address. You may also transmit written comments electronically via the Internet at: https://www.regulations.acf.gov. To download an electronic version of the rule, you may access https:// www.regulations.gov. ADDRESSES: Yvette Hilderson Riddick, Policy and Automation Liaison, OCSE, 202–401– 4885, e-mail: yriddick@acf.hhs.gov. Deaf and hearing-impaired individuals may call the Federal Dual Party Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. eastern time. FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: E:\FR\FM\14OCP1.SGM 14OCP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60037-60038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[R05-OAR-2005-WI-0002; FRL-7974-5]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Wisconsin

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Wisconsin State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) for an alternative volatile organic compounds 
(VOC) control device for Serigraph, Incorporated (Serigraph). On May 
18, 2005, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources submitted a 
request to revise the Wisconsin SIP. The proposed revision approves 
Serigraph's use of a biofilter to control VOC emissions from its 
printing facility in Washington County, Wisconsin. The biofilter system 
will reliably control emissions at or below the level of the control 
methods listed in the SIP. Serigraph has designed one of its plants as 
a permanent total enclosure (PTE), which captures all VOC emissions and 
routes them to the biofilter. There are no fugitive emissions from the 
plant. This reduces the total VOC emissions from Serigraph's facility.
    In the final rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is 
approving the SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior 
proposal, because EPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and 
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval 
is set forth in the direct final rule. We do not intend to take any 
further action in relation to this proposed rule unless we receive 
adverse comment this action. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will 
withdraw the direct final rule and will respond to all public comments 
in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 14, 
2005.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket 
(RME) ID No. R05-OAR-2005-WI-0002 by one of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    Agency Web site: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/.
    RME, EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's 
preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system, select 
``quick search,'' then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification 
number. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
    E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
    Fax: (312) 886-5824.
    Mail: You may send written comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    Hand delivery: Deliver your comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief, 
Criteria Pollutant Section (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604.
    Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's 
normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of 
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding 
Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R05-OAR-2005-WI-
0002. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in 
the public docket without change, including any personal information 
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you 
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov, 
or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and the Federal regulations.gov Web 
site are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know 
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body 
of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without 
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be 
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is 
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you 
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name 
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any 
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA 
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid 
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of 
any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting 
comments, go to Section I(B) of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 
of this document.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the 
RME index at https://www.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the index, 
some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 
information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Publicly 
available docket materials are available either electronically in RME 
or in hard copy at Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and 
Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

[[Page 60038]]

Illinois 60604. Please telephone Matt Rau at (312) 886-6524 before 
visiting the Region 5 Office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), USEPA, Region 
5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6524. 
Rau.matthew@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information
    A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
    B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the 
Corresponding Direct Final Rule?

I. General Information

A. Does This Action Apply to Me?

    This action applies to a single source, Serigraph, Incorporated of 
Washington County, Wisconsin.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI to EPA through RME, 
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, 
remember to:
    a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying 
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    b. Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific 
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and 
substitute language for your requested changes.
    d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information 
and/or data that you used.
    e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you 
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be 
reproduced.
    f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and 
suggest alternatives.
    g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of 
profanity or personal threats.
    h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline 
identified.

II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?

    EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Wisconsin VOC SIP for 
Serigraph. The revision approves Serigraph's use of a biofilter to 
control VOC emissions from several lines in Plant 2 at its facility. 
This is an alternative to the controls listed in the SIP. Section NR 
422.04(2)(d) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code allows an alternative 
control method that is demonstrated to reliably control emissions to a 
level at or below the applicable SIP limit and is approved by the 
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. The biofilter will reliably 
control VOC emissions at a level in line with other control techniques 
for surface printing facilities. An eighty percent overall control 
efficiency for VOC emissions is required for a control device. Overall 
control efficiency includes both capture and destruction efficiencies. 
Plant 2 is designed as a PTE ensuring all the emissions are captured 
and exhausted into the biofilter. Serigraph has operated its biofilter 
since May 1997. An average of 54 tons of VOC emissions are vented to 
the biofilter each year. The average exhaust from the biofilter is 
about 8 tons of VOC per year. This comfortably exceeds the control 
requirement.

III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the 
Corresponding Direct Final Rule?

    For additional information, see the Direct Final Rule which is 
located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. Copies of the 
request and the EPA's analysis are available electronically at RME or 
in hard copy at the above address. Please telephone Matt Rau at (312) 
886-6524 before visiting the Region 5 Office.

    Dated: September 15, 2005.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 05-20613 Filed 10-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.