Use of Ancillary Service Endorsement for Mailing Certain Types of Checks, 60036 [05-20563]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
60036
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Proposed Rules
5. Technical information on test and
evaluation methods for defining ATV
characteristics that are specifically
relevant to the vehicles’ stability.
6. Technical information on motion
sensing technology that can be used to
measure displacement, velocity, and
acceleration of both the test operator
and test vehicle.
7. Technical reports and evaluations
of any prototype ATVs with enhanced
safety designs.
8. Technical reports and evaluations
of ATV low pressure tire performance
on various surfaces.
9. Information about ATV rider
training programs, including
descriptions of these programs, copies
of materials used, expertise of
instructors, consumer reactions to the
programs, evaluations of the
effectiveness of these programs, etc.
10. Information about ATV rider
training and education programs
(including public service campaigns,
videos, school materials, Web sites, etc.)
targeted to children and teenagers and/
or targeted to parents and any
evaluations of the effectiveness of these
programs.
11. Studies, reports, focus group
information, etc. dealing with children
and teenagers’ attitudes and/or behavior
regarding ATVs or other off-road
vehicles.
12. Information about the feasibility
and marketability of a transitional ATV
geared to larger children and/or small
adults, and the effect such an ATV
might have on safety.
13. Information about the
applicability of sensor technology to
improve the safety of ATVs;
14. Studies documenting the
effectiveness of state and local
legislation;
15. Studies documenting the
effectiveness of ATV helmet use; and
16. Information about tandem ATVs,
particularly their similarities to and
differences from traditional ATVs.
17. All other relevant information and
suggestions about ways in which ATV
safety might be improved, including
proposals and specific suggestions for
greater public information efforts,
enhanced safety activities by ATV
dealers, associations and clubs, etc.
Comments should be e-mailed to
cpsc-os@cpsc.gov. and should be
captioned ‘‘ATV ANPR.’’ Comments
may also be mailed, preferably in five
copies, to the Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Washington, DC 20207–0001, or
delivered to the Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 502, 4330 East-West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814; telephone
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Oct 13, 2005
Jkt 208001
(301) 504–0800. Comments also may be
filed by telefacsimile to (301) 504–0127.
All comments and submissions should
be received no later than December 13,
2005.
Dated: October 7, 2005.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–20557 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
Use of Ancillary Service Endorsement
for Mailing Certain Types of Checks
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Postal Service.
Proposed rule; withdrawal.
SUMMARY: The Postal Service is
withdrawing a proposed rule that would
require ancillary service endorsements
on mailpieces containing certain types
of checks.
DATES:
Withdrawal effective October 14,
2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Chatfield, Mailing Standards,
United States Postal Service, 202–268–
7278.
In a
proposed rule published in the Federal
Register on October 27, 2004 (69 FR
6263), the Postal Service presented for
public comment a proposed revision to
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM) to require the use of ancillary
service endorsements on mailpieces
containing certain types of checks
mailed at Standard Mail postage rates.
The proposed revision was intended to
protect postal customers.
We received comments from the
financial industry discussing a number
of safeguards for customers that reduce
the incidence of fraud and the misuse of
information on these checks. We have
concluded that the requirements in our
proposal are unnecessary, and we
withdraw our proposal.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 05–20563 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R09–OAR–2005–CA–0009; FRL–7975–2]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Monterey Bay
United Air Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Monterey Bay United
Air Pollution Control District
(MBUAPCD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) and sulfur compounds emitted by
various sources. We are proposing to
approve a local rule to regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air
Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act).
Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by November 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number R09–OAR–
2005–CA–0009, by one of the following
methods:
1. Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. EPA prefers
receiving comments through this
electronic public docket and comment
system. Follow the on-line instructions
to submit comments.
2. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
3. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
4. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at
https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through the
agency Web site, eRulemaking portal or
e-mail. The agency Web site and
eRulemaking portal are ‘‘anonymous
access’’ systems, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send e-mail
directly to EPA, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\14OCP1.SGM
14OCP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 60036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20563]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
Use of Ancillary Service Endorsement for Mailing Certain Types of
Checks
AGENCY: Postal Service.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service is withdrawing a proposed rule that would
require ancillary service endorsements on mailpieces containing certain
types of checks.
DATES: Withdrawal effective October 14, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Chatfield, Mailing Standards,
United States Postal Service, 202-268-7278.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a proposed rule published in the Federal
Register on October 27, 2004 (69 FR 6263), the Postal Service presented
for public comment a proposed revision to Mailing Standards of the
United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM[supreg]) to
require the use of ancillary service endorsements on mailpieces
containing certain types of checks mailed at Standard Mail postage
rates. The proposed revision was intended to protect postal customers.
We received comments from the financial industry discussing a
number of safeguards for customers that reduce the incidence of fraud
and the misuse of information on these checks. We have concluded that
the requirements in our proposal are unnecessary, and we withdraw our
proposal.
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 05-20563 Filed 10-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
