Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Utah; Rules Recodification, 59681-59688 [05-20518]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 197 / Thursday, October 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in
EDOCKET or in hard copy during
normal business hours at the Air and
Radiation Docket, (EPA/DC) EPA West,
Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
the telephone number for the Air Docket
is (202) 566–1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marcia L. Spink, Associate Director for
Air Programs, Air Protection Division,
Mail Code 3AP20, U.S. EPA Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA
19103, telephone (215) 814–2104, or by
e-mail at spink.marcia @epa.gov. To
schedule a meeting with EPA, please
contact David Sanders, U.S. EPA, Ozone
Policy & Strategies Group, Air Quality
Strategies & Standards Division, Mail
Code C539–02, Office of Air Quality
Planning & Standards, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone
(919) 541–3356, or by e-mail at
sanders.dave@epa.gov.
Dated: October 5, 2005.
William L. Wehrum,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air
and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 05–20520 Filed 10–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[RME Docket No. R08–OAR–2005–UT–0001,
FRL–7983–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Utah;
Rules Recodification
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the Governor of
Utah on September 20, 1999 and
February 5, 2001. The September 20,
1999 submittal revises the numbering
and format of the Utah Administrative
Code (UAC) rules within Utah’s SIP.
The February 5, 2001 submittal restores
a paragraph that was inadvertently
deleted from Utah’s rules when the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Oct 12, 2005
Jkt 208001
State submitted their September 20,
1999 SIP submittal that renumbered the
UAC rules. The intended effect of this
action is to make these provisions
federally enforceable. In addition, the
approval of Utah’s September 20, 1999
SIP revision supersedes and replaces
previous SIP revisions submitted by
Utah on October 26, 2000, September 7,
1999, two SIP revisions submitted
February 6, 1996, and one submitted on
January 27, 1995. Some of the
provisions of the rules submitted in
Utah’s SIP revisions will be addressed at
a later date by more recent SIP actions
that have been submitted which
supersede and replace the earlier SIP
submittal actions. EPA will be removing
Utah’s Asbestos Work Practices,
Contractor Certification, AHERA
Accreditation and AHERA
Implementation rule R307–1–8 and
Eligibility of Pollution Control
Expenditures for Sales Tax Exemption
rule R307–1–6 from Utah’s federally
enforceable SIP because these rules are
not generally related to attainment of
the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) and are therefore
not required to be in Utah’s SIP. Finally,
EPA will be removing Utah’s National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants rule R307–1–4.12. Utah has
delegation of authority for NESHAPs in
40 CFR part 61 (49 FR 36368), pursuant
to 110(k)(6) of the Act, therefore we are
removing the existing language (R307–
1–4.12) that was approved into Utah’s
current SIP because it is no longer
required to be in the SIP. This action is
being taken under section 110 of the
Clean Air Act.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. R08–OAR–
2005–UT–0001, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Website: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/index.jsp.
Regional Materials in EDOCKET (RME),
EPA’s electronic public docket and
comment system for regional actions, is
EPA’s preferred method for receiving
comments. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: long.richard@epa.gov and
faulk.libby@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Richard R. Long, Director, Air
and Radiation Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59681
Mailcode 8P–AR, 999 18th Street, Suite
200, Denver, Colorado 80202–2466.
• Hand Delivery: Richard R. Long,
Director, Air and Radiation Program,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 999
18th Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado
80202–2466. Such deliveries are only
accepted Monday through Friday, 8 a.m.
to 4:55 p.m., excluding federal holidays.
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. R08–OAR–2005–UT–
0001. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available at https://docket.epa.gov/
rmepub/index.jsp, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through EDOCKET,
regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA’s
Regional Materials in EDOCKET and
federal regulations.gov website are
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA, without going through
EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit
EDOCKET online or see the Federal
Register of May 31, 2002 (67 FR 38102).
For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I.
General Information of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the Regional Materials in
EDOCKET index at https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/index.jsp.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
59682
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 197 / Thursday, October 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in
Regional Materials in EDOCKET or in
hard copy at the Air and Radiation
Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, 999 18th
Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado
80202–2466. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding
federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Libby Faulk, EPA, Region 8, 999 18th
Street, Ste. 200 (8P–AR), Denver, CO,
80202–2466, (303) 312–6083,
faulk.libby@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, wherever
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, or ‘‘our’’ are used, we mean
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA).
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. What Is the Purpose of this Proposed
Action?
III. Utah Rules EPA is Proposing to Act On
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review
I. General Information
Definitions—For the purpose of this
document, we are giving meaning to
certain words or initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA
mean or refer to the Clean Air Act,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our
mean or refer to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to
State Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words State mean the State
of Utah, unless the context indicates
otherwise.
A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through Regional
Materials in EDOCKET, regulations.gov
or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be
CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD
ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the
outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI
and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD ROM the specific
information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Oct 12, 2005
Jkt 208001
claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
I. Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
II. Follow directions—The agency
may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by
referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section
number.
III. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
IV. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
V. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
VI. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
VII. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
Make sure to submit your comments by
the comment period deadline identified.
II. What Is the Purpose of This
Proposed Action?
In this document we are addressing
seven State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions, submitted by the Governor of
Utah dated: February 5, 2001, October
26, 2000, September 20, 1999,
September 7, 1999, two SIP revisions
submitted February 6, 1996, and one
submitted on January 27, 1995. These
SIP revisions modify the Utah
Administrative Code (UAC) rules within
Utah’s SIP. Each of these SIP submittals
is described in more detail below.
The September 20, 1999 submittal
revises the numbering and format of the
UAC rules within Utah’s SIP. The
renumbering and reformatting of the
UAC rules within Utah’s SIP provides
for a more consistent numbering system
and a coherent structure allowing
provisions to be located more easily
within Utah’s rules. Some provisions of
the rules submitted in Utah’s September
20, 1999 SIP revision will be addressed
at a later date.
We are not acting on a portion of
Utah’s September 7, 1999 SIP submittal
that deletes rule R307–150–1 (existing
rule number R307–1–2.2) and rule
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
R307–150–2 (existing rule number
R307–1–3.1.7) because the renumbering
of these rules have never been approved
into the SIP and have since been
superseded and replaced by Utah’s
February 5, 2001 and October 9, 1998
SIP submittals’. Rule R307–150–1 is
restored to its appropriate rule section
in Utah’s February 5, 2001 SIP submittal
which we’ll be acting on in this action.
The February 5, 2001 submittal contains
a non-substantive change to correct a
minor change that was submitted in the
September 20, 1999 submittal that
inadvertently deleted rule R307–102–
1(2) from Utah’s rules and moved the
rule to R307–150–1. Rule renumbering
R307–150–2 will not be addressed in
this action because it will be addressed
at a later date when EPA addresses
Utah’s October 9, 1998 SIP submittal.
Therefore, the existing rule R307–1–3.7
which would have been renumbered to
R307–150–2 will remain in Utah’s SIP.
We are proposing to not act on Utah’s
February 6, 1996 SIP submittal that
pertains to Utah’s rule R307–2 and
portions of Utah’s February 6, 1996 SIP
submittal that pertains to rule R307–1–
4. These SIP submittals, and portions
thereof, are superseded and replaced by
Utah’s September 20, 1999 SIP
submittal.
We are proposing to act on a portion
of Utah’s January 27, 1995 SIP submittal
that pertains to Utah’s rules R307–1–
2.3.2. Utah’s rule R307–1–2.3.2 adds a
reference to Utah’s Code to clarify
where to find further information
regarding Utah’s variance rule. We will
not be addressing Utah’s revisions to
rule R307–1–3.1.4 or R307–1–3.2.3.
Utah’s rule R307–1–3.1.4 will be
addressed at a later date when EPA
addresses Utah’s October 9, 1998 SIP
submittal. Therefore, rule R307–1–3.1.4
will remain in the current SIP. Utah’s
rule R307–1–3.2.3 will be addressed at
a later date when EPA addresses Utah’s
PM10 maintenance plan for Utah and
Salt Lake County. Therefore, Utah’s rule
R307–1–3.2.3 will remain in the current
SIP.
Finally, we are acting on removing
Utah’s asbestos rule R307–1–8 from
Utah’s federally enforceable SIP because
the rule is not generally related to
attainment of the NAAQS and is
therefore, not appropriate to be in
Utah’s SIP. We are also proposing to not
act on Utah’s October 26, 2000 SIP
submittal because the SIP pertains to
changes being made to Utah’s asbestos
rule R307–1–8 that we are removing
from Utah’s SIP in this action. EPA
informed UDAQ of our intent to not act
on Utah’s October 26, 2000 SIP
submittal and our intent to remove
existing asbestos rule language (R307–
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 197 / Thursday, October 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
1–8) from Utah’s federally approved SIP
in a letter to UDAQ, dated April 2, 2002.
By this action, EPA has reviewed the
Utah Department of Air Quality’s
(UDAQ) SIP submittals and found that
these SIP submittals only renumber and
restructure UDAQ’s rules. EPA has not
reviewed the substance of these rules as
part of this action; EPA approved these
state rules into the SIP in previous
rulemakings. The EPA is now merely
approving the renumbering system
submitted by the State. The current
version of UDAQ’s rules does not
contain substantive changes from the
prior codification that we approved into
the SIP. EPA acknowledges that there
are ongoing discussions with Utah to
address EPA’s concerns with some rule
language that EPA previously approved
into the Utah SIP. In an April 18, 2002
letter from Richard Sprott, Director of
Utah’s Division of Air Quality, to
Richard Long, Director of the Air and
Radiation Program in EPA Region 8,
UDAQ committed to work with us to
address our concerns with the Utah SIP.
Because the SIP submittals only
restructure and renumber the existing
SIP-approved regulations, contain no
substantive changes, and UDAQ has
committed to address EPA’s concerns,
we believe it is appropriate to propose
to approve the submittal. Approving the
restructured and renumbered Utah rules
into the SIP will also facilitate future
discussions on the rules. EPA will
continue to require the State to correct
any rule deficiencies despite EPA’s
approval of this recodificiation.
The specific changes being proposed
in this action are explained in more
detail below (see III.A., III.B., and III.C.).
III. Utah Rules EPA Is Proposing To Act
On
We reviewed Utah’s seven submittals
and placed each rule section into a
category based on the changes that were
made in the rule and/or our action on
the rule. The first category (see III.A.
below) consists of those rules (and all
subsections of the rule) which have
been recodified and contain nonsubstantive changes to the text of the
rule. We are proposing to approve the
recodified rules and the non-substantive
changes. The second category (see III.B.
below) consists of rules (and all
subsections of the rule) that we are
proposing to take no action on or are
acting to remove the rule language from
Utah’s SIP. The rule(s) listed under
category two have either never been
approved into the SIP or have been
approved into the SIP and are not
appropriate to be in the federally
approved SIP because the rule is not
generally related to attainment of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Oct 12, 2005
Jkt 208001
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). The third category (see III.C.
below) consists of rules (and all
subsections of the rule) that have been
superseded and replaced by other Utah
SIP submittals that recodifies Utah’s
rules or consists of rule(s) (and all
subsections of the rule) that we will be
addressing at a later date.
A. Category 1
We are proposing to approve the
following rule changes of the Utah Air
Quality Rules because the rules have
only been renumbered, contain nonsubstantive changes to the rule that do
not effect the meaning of the rule and/
or have been modified to move
definitions that have already been
approved into the SIP to specific rule
sections in which the definitions apply.
These renumbered rules and all
subsections within these rules
supersede and replace the prior
numbered rules and subsections in
Utah’s federally approved SIP. These
rule changes were submitted under
UDAQ’s SIP submittals dated January
27, 1995, September 7, 1999, September
20, 1999, and February 5, 2001. Any SIP
revision submitted by the State after
February 5, 2001 that is not addressed
in this notice and has been approved by
EPA will remain effective in the SIP and
will not be replaced by this action.
1. Rule R307–101—General
Requirements (previously found under
R307–1). This section contains UDAQ’s
Forward and Definitions that apply to
Utah’s air quality rules. We are
approving the renumbering of this rule
section and all subsections of this rule
with the exception of the definitions for
‘‘actual emissions,’’ ‘‘major
modification,’’ ‘‘Part 70 Source,’’
‘‘significant,’’ and ‘‘volatile organic
compound.’’ (See III.B.1.a. and b.
below). R307–101 has only been
renumbered and contains no changes to
the language of the rule that would
affect the meaning of the rule. UDAQ
relocated some definitions from rule
R307–101 to specific rule sections
throughout Utah’s rules to better
coordinate specific definitions that
apply in specific rule sections. The
definitions that were relocated to other
rule sections contain no changes to the
language that would affect the meaning
of the rule.
2. Rule R307–102—General
Requirements: Broadly Applicable
Requirements (previously found under
R307–1–2.1, R307–1–2.3, R307–1.2.5,
and R307–1–4.8). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule that were
submitted in Utah’s September 20, 1999
and February 5, 2001 SIP submittals’’. In
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59683
Utah’s September 20, 1999 SIP
submittal Utah inadvertently moved
rule R307–1–2.2 to rule section R307–
150–1 (State effective September 15,
1998). When Utah realized their error,
Utah submitted a SIP revision, dated
September 7, 1999 (State effective
March 4, 1999), deleting the rule from
R307–150–1 and submitted a new SIP
revision, dated February 5, 2001 (State
effective August 3, 2000), that relocated
the original rule R307–1–2.2 that was
inadvertently moved to R307–150–1 to
its appropriate location under the new
numbering R307–102–1. We are also
acting to approve a portion of Utah’s
January 27, 1995 SIP submittal that
pertains to rule R307–1–2.3.1 which in
this action is being renumbered to
R307–102–4(1) through the approval of
Utah’s September 20, 1999 SIP
submittal. Utah’s January 27, 1995 SIP
submittal that pertains to rule R307–1–
2.3.2 (renumbered under this action as
R307–102–4(1)) added a reference to
Utah’s code 19–2–113 clarifying where
to find further information regarding
applications for variances. EPA
considers this change to be a nonsubstantive change that does not affect
the meaning of the rule and is therefore
being approved. EPA is also approving
rule R307–102–6 which adds language
to clarify that should there be more
stringent controls listed within Utah’s
R307 rules, those requirements must be
met. EPA considers this change to be a
non-substantive change that does not
affect the meaning of the rule, but
simply clarifies rules which should be
met within the SIP.
3. Rule R307–105—General
Requirements: Emergency Controls
(previously found under R307–1–5.1
through R307–1–5.4). We are approving
the renumbering of this rule section and
all subsections of this rule. Rule R307–
105 and all subsections of the rule have
only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
4. Rule R307–107—General
Requirements: Unavoidable Breakdown
(previously found under R307–1–4.7
through R307–1–4.7.4). We are
approving the renumbering of this rule
section and all subsections of this rule.
Rule R307–107–1 through R307–4 and
all subsections of the rule have only
been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
We are also approving the addition of
rule R307–107–6 which adds language
to clarify that should there be more
stringent controls listed within Utah’s
R307 rules, those requirements must be
met. EPA considers this change to be a
non-substantive change that does not
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
59684
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 197 / Thursday, October 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
affect the meaning of the rule but simply
clarifies rules which should be met
within the SIP.
5. Rule R307–110—General
Requirements: State Implementation
Plan (previously found under R307–2).
We are approving the renumbering and
adoption of the following rules because
the rules have only been renumbered
and contain no changes to the language
of the rule that would effect the
meaning of the rule: R307–110–1
through R307–110–9, R307–110–11,
R307–110–13 through R307–110–15,
R307–110–18, R307–110–20 through
R307–110–28, R307–110–30, and R307–
110–32. EPA will not be addressing the
remainder of rule section R307–110 for
reasons discussed under III.C.4. below.
6. Rule R307–115—General
Conformity (previously found under
R307–19). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. Rule R307–115
and all subsections of the rule have only
been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
7. Rule R307–130—General Penalty
Policy (previously found under R307–4–
1 through R307–4–4). We are approving
the renumbering of this rule section and
all subsections of this rule. Rule R307–
130 and all subsections of the rule have
only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
8. Rule R307–165—Emission Testing
(previously found under R307–1–3.4.1
through R307–1–3.4.4). We are
approving the renumbering of this rule
section and all subsections of this rule.
Rule R307–165 and all subsections of
the rule have only been renumbered and
contain no changes to the language of
the rule that would affect the meaning
of the rule.
9. Rule R307–201—Emission
Standards: General Emission Standards
(previously found under R307–1–4.1,
R307–1–4.9, R307–1–4.13.2, and R307–
4.1.2 through R307–4.1.9). We are
approving the renumbering of this rule
section and all subsections of this rule.
Rule R307–201 and all subsections of
the rule have only been renumbered and
contain no changes to the language of
the rule that would affect the meaning
of the rule.
10. Rule R307–202—Emission
Standards: General Burning (previously
found under R307–1–2.4 through R307–
1–2.4.5). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. Rule R307–202
and all subsections of the rule have only
been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Oct 12, 2005
Jkt 208001
11. Rule R307–203—Emission
Standards: Sulfur Content of Fuels
(previously found under R307–1–4.2
and R307–1–4.13.1). We are approving
the renumbering of this rule section and
all subsections of this rule. Rule R307–
203 and all subsections of the rule have
only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
EPA is also approving rule R307–203–
3 which adds language to clarify that
should there be more stringent controls
listed within Utah’s R307 rules, those
requirements must be met. EPA
considers this change to be a nonsubstantive change that does not affect
the meaning of the rule, but simply
clarifies rules which should be met
within the SIP.
12. Rule R307–206—Emission
Standards: Abrasive Blasting
(previously found under R307–1–4.10.1,
2 and 3). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. Rule R307–206
and all subsections of the rule have only
been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
EPA is also approving the addition of
rule R307–206–1 which includes
definitions that are already approved in
the existing SIP. EPA is also approving
rule R307–206–5 which adds language
to clarify that should there be more
stringent controls listed within Utah’s
R307 rules, those requirements must be
met. EPA considers these changes to be
a non-substantive change that does not
affect the meaning of the rule but simply
clarifies rules which should be met
within the SIP.
13. Rule R307–302—Davis, Salt Lake,
Utah Counties: Residential Fireplaces
and Stoves (previously found under
R307–1–4.13.3). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule with the
exception of rule section R307–302–2(4)
and R307–302–3 (see III.C.10. below).
EPA is also approving the addition of
rule R307–302–1 which includes
definitions that are already approved in
the existing SIP. The remainder of rule
R307–302 and all subsections of the rule
have only been renumbered and contain
no changes to the language of the rule
that would affect the meaning of the
rule.
14. Rule R307–305—Davis, Salt Lake
and Utah Counties and Ogden City, and
Nonattainment Areas for PM10:
Particulates (previously found under
R307–1–4.1.1, R307–1–3.2.1 through
R307–1–3.2.6). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. Rule R307–305
and all subsections of the rule have only
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule. In
addition to the approval of renumbering
of rule R307–305, EPA is retaining
Utah’s rule R307–1–3.2.3. Utah
submitted a SIP revision, dated January
27, 1995, requesting the deletion of rule
R307–1–3.2.3(E) which EPA will be
addressing at a later date; therefore, this
rule will remain in the current SIP.
15. Rule R307–307—Davis, Salt Lake,
and Utah Counties: Road Salting and
Sanding (previously found under R307–
1–3.2.7.A, B and C). We are approving
the renumbering of this rule section and
all subsections of this rule. Rule R307–
307 and all subsections of the rule have
only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
16. Rule R307–325—Davis and Salt
Lake counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Ozone Provisions
(previously found under R307–1–4.9.8
and R307–14–1.F). We are approving
the renumbering of this rule section and
all subsections of this rule. Rule R307–
325 and all subsections of the rule have
only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
17. Rule R307–326—Davis and Salt
Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Control of
Hydrocarbon Emissions in Refineries
(previously found under R307–1–4.9.3).
We are approving the renumbering of
this rule section and all subsections of
this rule. EPA is also approving the
addition of rule R307–326–1 which
includes definitions that are already
approved in the existing SIP. Rule
R307–326 and all subsections of the rule
have only been renumbered and contain
no changes to the language of the rule
that would affect the meaning of the
rule.
18. Rule R307–327—Davis and Salt
Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Petroleum Liquid
Storage (previously found under R307–
1–4.9.1). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. EPA is also
approving the addition of rule R307–
327–1(2) which includes definitions
that are already approved in the existing
SIP. Rule R307–327 and all subsections
of the rule have only been renumbered
and contain no changes to the language
of the rule that would affect the
meaning of the rule.
19. Rule R307–328—Davis and Salt
Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Gasoline Transfer
and Storage (previously found under
R307–1–4.9.2). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 197 / Thursday, October 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
subsections of this rule. EPA is also
approving the addition of rule R307–
328–1 which includes definitions that
are already approved in the existing SIP.
Rule R307–328 and all subsections of
the rule have only been renumbered and
contain no changes to the language of
the rule that would affect the meaning
of the rule.
20. Rule R307–335—Davis and Salt
Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Degreasing and
Solvent Cleaning Operations (previously
found under R307–1–4.9.4). We are
approving the renumbering of this rule
section and all subsections of this rule.
EPA is also approving the addition of
rule R307–335–1 which includes
definitions that are already approved in
the existing SIP. Rule R307–335 and all
subsections of the rule have only been
renumbered and contain no changes to
the language of the rule that would
affect the meaning of the rule.
21. Rule R307–340 Davis and Salt
Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Surface Coating
Processes (previously found under
R307–1–4.9.6). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. EPA is also
approving the addition of rule R307–
340–1 which includes definitions that
are already approved in the existing SIP.
Rule R307–340 and all subsections of
the rule have only been renumbered and
contain no changes to the language of
the rule that would affect the meaning
of the rule.
22. Rule R307–341—Davis and Salt
Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Cutback Asphalt
(previously found under R307–1–4.9.5).
EPA is also approving the addition of
rule R307–341–1 which includes
definitions that are already approved in
the existing SIP. We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. Rule R307–341
and all subsections of the rule have only
been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
23. Rule R307–342—Davis and Salt
Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Qualification of
Contractors, Test Procedures for Testing
of Vapor Recovery Systems for Gasoline
Delivery Tanks (previously found under
R307–3). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. Rule R307–342
and all subsections of the rule have only
been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
24. Rule R307–401—Permit: Notice of
Intent and Approval Order. In this
action we are acting only to approve the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Oct 12, 2005
Jkt 208001
recodification of subsections R307–401–
9 and R307–401–10(1) (previously
found under R307–1–3.1.11 and 12). All
subsections of rule R307–401–9 and
R307–401–10(1) have only been
renumbered and contain no changes to
the language of the rule that would
affect the meaning of the rule. For EPA’s
action on the remainder of the rules
located under R307–401 (see III.C.11
below).
25. Rule R307–403 ‘‘ Permits: New
and Modified Sources in Nonattainment
Areas and Maintenance Areas
(previously found under R307–1–3.3).
We are approving the renumbering of
this rule section and all subsections of
this rule. EPA is also approving the
addition of rule R307–403–1 which
includes definitions that are already
approved in the existing SIP. Rule
R307–403 and all subsections of the rule
have only been renumbered and contain
no changes to the language of the rule
that would affect the meaning of the
rule.
26. Rule R307–405—Permits:
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
of Air Quality (PSD) (previously found
under R307–1–3.6). We are approving
the renumbering of this rule section and
all subsections of this rule. EPA is also
approving the addition of rule R307–
405–1 which includes definitions that
are already approved in the existing SIP.
Rule R307–405 and all subsections of
the rule have only been renumbered and
contain no changes to the language of
the rule that would affect the meaning
of the rule.
27. Rule R307–406—Visibility
(previously found under R307–1–3.10).
We are approving the renumbering of
this rule section and all subsections of
this rule. EPA is also approving the
addition of rule R307–406–1 which
includes definitions that are already
approved in the existing SIP. Rule
R307–406 and all subsections of the rule
have only been renumbered and contain
no changes to the language of the rule
that would affect the meaning of the
rule.
28. Rule R307–413—Permits:
Exemption and Special Provisions
(previously found under R307–7–2 and
3). In this action we are approving the
recodification of rule R307–413–7
(previously found under R307–7–2 and
3). Rule R307–413–7 has only been
renumbered and contains no changes to
the language of the rule that would
affect the meaning of the rule. We will
not be acting on rule sections R307–
413–1 through R307–413–6, R307–413–
8 and R307–413–9 for the reasons
explained in III.C.12. below.
29. Rule R307–414—Permits: Fees for
Approval Orders (previously found
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59685
under R307–1–3.9). We are approving
the renumbering of this rule section and
all subsections of this rule. Rule R307–
414 and all subsections of the rule have
only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
B. Category 2
Category two consists of some of
Utah’s rules (and includes all
subsections of the rule) that we are not
acting on approving into the SIP or are
acting to remove the rule language from
the SIP and a discussion of why we
believe we cannot act to approve the
rules in the SIP. These rule changes
were submitted by UDAQ on January
27, 1995, September 20, 1999, and
October 26, 2000.
1. We will not be acting on the
following rule definition(s) into Utah’s
SIP either because the definition(s) is
not required to be approved into Utah’s
SIP or because the definition(s) has been
superseded and replaced by more recent
SIP submittal actions and will therefore
be addressed in those actions:
a. Utah’s September 20, 1999 SIP
submittal wherein Utah recodified
Utah’s rules included the definition
‘‘Part 70 Source.’’ We will not be
approving this definition in this action.
This definition has never been approved
into Utah’s SIP and is not required to be
in Utah’s SIP.
b. Utah’s September 20, 1999 SIP
submittal wherein Utah recodified
Utah’s rules included the definition
‘‘actual emissions,’’ ‘‘major
modification,’’ ‘‘significant’’ and
‘‘volatile organic compound.’’ The
‘‘actual emissions’’ and ‘‘major
modification’’ definitions have been
revised by the State and were approved
by EPA August 19, 2004 (69 FR 51368).
The ‘‘significant’’ and ‘‘volatile organic
compound’’ definitions have been
revised by the State and were approved
by EPA on February 21, 2002 (67 FR
7961).
2. R307–121—General Requirements:
Eligibility of Expenditures for Purchase
of Vehicles that Use Cleaner Burning
Fuels or Conversion of Vehicles and
Special Fuel Mobile Equipment to Use
Cleaner Burning Fuels for Corporate and
Individual Income Tax Credits. This
rule section has never been approved
into Utah’s SIP. We are not taking action
to incorporate rule R307–121 that
pertains to corporate and individual
income tax credit into the SIP because
the provisions of R307–122 are not
generally related to attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS. In a letter
to EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005,
UDAQ agreed with EPA’s action to not
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
59686
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 197 / Thursday, October 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
approve this rule section into Utah’s
SIP.
3. R307–122—General Requirements:
Eligibility of Expenditures for Purchase
and Installation Costs of Fireplaces and
Wood Stoves that Use Cleaner Burning
Fuels. This rule section has never been
approved into Utah’s SIP. We are not
taking action to incorporate rule R307–
122 into the SIP that pertains to tax
credit because the provisions of R307–
122 are not generally related to
attainment or maintenance of the
NAAQS. In a letter to EPA from UDAQ,
dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with
EPA’s action to not approve this rule
section into Utah’s SIP.
4. R307–135—Enforcement Response
Policy for Asbestos Hazard Emergency
Response Act. We are not taking action
to incorporate rule R307–135 (formerly
R307–4–5 through R307–4–11 in Utah’s
State rules) into the SIP because
provisions of R307–135 are not
generally related to attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS and have
never been approved into Utah’s SIP.
Rule R307–135 provisions implement
requirements from the Asbestos Hazard
Emergency Response Act (AHERA) of
1986, while SIP rules implement Clean
Air Act (CAA) Title I provisions. In a
letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated April
7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA’s
action to not approve this rule section
into Utah’s SIP.
5. R307–214—National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants.
Rule R307–214 (formerly rule R307–10
in Utah’s State rules) is the rule the
State uses to implement our national
emission standards for hazardous air
pollutants (NESHAPs) regulations in 40
CFR part 61. Given that the State has
delegation of authority for NESHAPs in
40 CFR part 61 (49 FR 36368), pursuant
to 110(k)(6) of the Act, we are not
approving the new codification of
R307–214 into the SIP and are removing
existing language that was approved
into Utah’s current SIP, rule R307–1–
4.12, for the same reason stated above.
In a letter to EPA from the UDAQ, dated
April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA’s
action to not approve this rule section
into Utah’s SIP.
6. R307–215—Emission Standards:
Acid Rain Requirements. We are not
taking action to incorporate rule R307–
215 (formerly R307–16–02 in Utah’s
State rules) into the SIP. The provisions
of R307–215 have never been approved
into Utah’s SIP and are not required to
be incorporated into the SIP. Rule
R307–215 incorporates by reference
Acid Rain NOX emission limitation
requirements (40 CFR Part 76) from
Title IV of the CAA, while SIP rules
implement CAA Title I provisions. In a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Oct 12, 2005
Jkt 208001
letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated April
7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA’s
action to not approve this rule section
into Utah’s SIP.
7. R307–220—Emission Standards:
Plan for Designated Facilities. On
October 3, 2002, the State adopted rules
for Plans for Designated Facilities. We
believe we have no legal basis in the Act
for approving Utah’s rule for Plans for
Designated Facilities, rule R307–220,
into the SIP because these rules are not
generally related to attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS and have
never been approved into Utah’s SIP.
Therefore, we are not taking action to
incorporate R307–220 into Utah’s SIP.
However, on January 14, 1998 (63 FR
2156), we did approve these rules as
meeting section 111(d) of the Act. See
40 CFR 62.11110–11112. In a letter to
EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005,
UDAQ agreed with EPA’s action to not
approve this rule section into Utah’s
SIP.
8. R307–221—Emission Standards:
Emission Controls for Existing
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. On
September 3, 1999, the State adopted
rules for Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills. We believe we have no legal
basis in the Act for approving Utah’s
rule for Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills, rule R307–221, into the SIP
because these rules are not generally
related to attainment or maintenance of
the NAAQS and have never been
approved into Utah’s SIP. Therefore, we
are not taking action to incorporate
R307–221 into the SIP. However, on
January 14, 1998 (63 FR 2156), we did
approve these rules as meeting section
111(d) of the Act. See 40 CFR 62.11110–
11112. In a letter to EPA from UDAQ,
dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with
EPA’s action to not approve this rule
section into Utah’s SIP.
9. R307–320—Davis, Salt Lake and
Utah Counties, and Ogden City:
Employer Based Trip Reduction
Program. We are not acting to approve
rule section R307–320 into the SIP. Rule
R307–320 has never been approved into
Utah’s SIP and is not required to be
incorporated into the SIP. In a letter to
EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005,
UDAQ agreed with EPA’s action to not
approve this rule section into Utah’s
SIP.
10. R307–332—Davis and Salt Lake
Counties and Ozone Nonattainment
Areas: Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems.
Rule R307–332 (formerly R307–14–10 in
Utah’s State rules) had never been
approved into the Utah SIP. On April 6,
1994 (59 FR 16262) EPA removed the
requirements of this rule for ‘‘moderate’’
and ‘‘attainment’’ areas, and the rule
was preserved among the State air
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
quality rules for the eventuality that
Davis and Salt Lake Counties would
become a non-attainment area.
However, since 1994 more effective
methods have emerged to achieve
meeting the NAAQS if Davis and Salt
Lake County should become a
nonattainment area, therefore, we are
not taking action to incorporate this rule
section into the SIP. In a letter to EPA
from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ
agreed with EPA’s action to not approve
this rule section into Utah’s SIP.
11. R307–410—Permits: Emissions
Impact Analysis. We will not be acting
to approve the renumbering of rule
section R307–410. Revisions were made
to this rule section by Utah and
submitted to EPA in a SIP submittal,
dated November 20, 1996 and May 12,
1998, and were subsequently withdrawn
by Utah in a letter addressed to EPA,
Regional Administrator, William
Yellowtail, dated October 16, 2000.
Because Utah’s September 20, 1999 SIP,
which reorganizes the States rules, still
includes the revisions that were made to
R307–410 that were ultimately
withdrawn by the State, EPA cannot act
to approve this rule section. Therefore,
the existing rules R307–1–3.7 will
remain current in the SIP.
12. R307–415—Permits: Operating
Permit Requirements. We are not taking
action to incorporate rule R307–415
(formerly R307–15 in Utah’s State rules)
into the SIP. Provisions of R307–415
have never been approved into Utah’s
SIP and are not required to be approved
into the SIP. Rule R307–415 provisions
implement operating permit program
requirements from Title V of the CAA,
while SIP rules implement CAA Title I
provisions. In a letter to EPA from the
UDAQ dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ
agreed with EPA’s action to not approve
this rule section into Utah’s SIP.
13. R307–417—Permits: Acid Rain
Sources. We are not taking action to
incorporate R307–417 (formerly R307–
17–1 in Utah’s State rules) into the SIP.
Provisions of R307–417 have never been
approved into Utah’s SIP and are not
required to be approved into the SIP.
Rule R307–417 incorporates by
reference Acid Rain permitting (40 CFR
part 72) requirements from Title IV of
the CAA, while SIP rules implement the
CAA Title I provisions. In a letter to
EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005,
UDAQ agreed with EPA’s action to not
approve this rule section into Utah’s
SIP.
14. R307–1–6 (revised number R307–
120)—General Requirements: Tax
Exemption for Air and Water Pollution
Control Equipment. We are removing
from Utah’s SIP rule R307–1–6 and all
subsections of this rule. EPA is also not
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 197 / Thursday, October 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
acting on approving the new recodified
number for R307–1–6 which is R307–
120. This rule language pertains to State
Sales Tax Exemptions for Pollution
Control Expenditures and is not
generally related to attainment of the
NAAQS and is, therefore, not
appropriate to be in Utah’s SIP. In a
letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated April
7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA’s
action to remove rule R307–1–6 from
Utah’s SIP and to not approve rule
R307–120.
15. R307–1–8 (revised number R307–
801)—Asbestos. We are removing from
Utah’s SIP rule R307–1–8 and all
subsections of this rule. EPA is also not
acting on approving the new recodified
number for R307–1–8 which is R307–
801. Finally, we are not acting on Utah’s
October 26, 2000 SIP submittal because
the SIP pertains to changes being made
to Utah’s asbestos rule R307–1–8 that
we are removing from Utah’s SIP in this
action. This rule language pertains to
the regulation of asbestos and is
generally not related to attainment of
the NAAQS; therefore, it is not
appropriate to be in Utah’s SIP. EPA
informed UDAQ of our intent to not act
on Utah’s October 26, 2000 SIP
submittal and our intent to remove
existing asbestos rule language (R307–
1–8) from Utah’s federally approved SIP
in a letter to UDAQ, dated April 2, 2002.
In a letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated
April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA’s
action to remove rule R307–1–8 from
Utah’s SIP and to not approve rule
R307–801.
C. Category 3
Category three consists of rule(s) (and
all subsections of the rule) that we will
be addressing at a later date through
other SIP submittal revisions that Utah
has or intends to submit that supersede
and replace the existing rules. These
rule changes were submitted by UDAQ
on January 27, 1995, February 6, 1996,
and September 20, 1999.
1. Utah’s February 6, 1996 SIP
submittal titled ‘‘Expansion of R307–2’’
that recodified and expanded Utah’s
R307–2. We will not be acting on this
SIP submittal because the September 20,
1999 SIP submittal that we are acting on
in this notice supersedes and replaces
the February 6, 1996 SIP submittal and
relocates rules that would have been
found under R307–2 to new rule section
R307–110.
2. Portions of Utah’s February 6, 1996
SIP submittal that recodifies Utah’s
Emission Standards rule(s) that pertain
to subsections: R307–1–4.9 and R307–
1–4.12. We will not be acting on these
specific rules within this SIP submittal
because the September 20, 1999 SIP
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Oct 12, 2005
Jkt 208001
submittal that we are acting on in this
notice supersedes and replaces this
revision and relocates rule R307–1–4.9
to rule section R307–325 and rule R307–
1–4.12 to rule section R307–203.
3. Utah’s February 6, 1996 SIP
submittal that recodifies Utah’s
Emission Standards rule R307–1–4 that
pertains to changes made in subsection
R307–1–4.6. We will not be acting on
subsection R307–1–4.6 of this SIP
submittal because this subsection has
been superseded and replaced in Utah’s
SIP submittal dated September 7, 1999
and February 11, 2003 and was
approved by EPA on May 15, 2003 (68
FR 26210). Rule R307–1–4.6 is now
located under rule section R307–170.
4. Rule R307–110—General
Requirements: State Implementation
Plan. We are not proposing to act on
R307–110–10, R307–110–17, R307–110–
19, R307–110–33, and R307–110–35
because these rules were superseded by
more recent SIP submittal that have
already been approved into Utah’s
federally approved SIP (see 65 FR
37286, 67 FR 57744, and 67 FR 62891).
We are also not addressing rule R307–
110–12, R307–110–31, R307–110–34,
and R307–110–35 because this rule
section will be addressed when EPA
addresses Utah’s April 1, 2004 and
November 29, 2004 SIP submittals.
Therefore, the existing rule R307–2–12
that would have been renumbered to
R307–110–12 will remain in the SIP. We
are also not acting to approve R307–
110–16 because Utah repealed this rule
from the federally approved SIP in their
June 17, 1998 SIP submittal that EPA
approved on May 20, 2002 (67 FR
35442). We are not addressing rule
R307–110–29 because this rule was
revised in Utah’s February 6, 1996 SIP
submittal which EPA will be addressing
at a later date. Therefore, the existing
rule R307–2–18 that would have been
renumbered to R307–110–29 will
remain in the SIP.
5. Utah’s September 20, 1999 SIP
submittal that recodifies Utah’s
Continuous Emission Monitoring
Systems rule R307–170. We will not be
acting on this rule section of the
September 20, 1999 SIP submittal
because this rule section was already
approved by EPA on May 15, 2003 (68
FR 26210).
6. Utah’s January 27, 1995 SIP
submittal pertaining to rule R307–1–
3.1.4 which deletes a reference to
unspecify other state, local and federal
requirements. We will not be addressing
this specific rule revision because the
revision has been superseded and
replaced by Utah’s October 9, 1998 SIP
submittal which will be addressed at a
later date. Therefore, current rule
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59687
section R307–1–3.1.4 will remain in the
existing SIP.
7. Utah’s February 6, 1996 SIP
submittal that recodifies Utah’s
Emission Standards rule R307–1–4 that
pertains to changes made in subsection
R307–1–4.5. We will not be addressing
this rule section of this SIP submittal.
This rule section will be addressed at a
later date when the UDAQ submits
revisions to UDAQ’s September 20,
1999 SIP submittal that pertains to
Utah’s fugitive emissions and fugitive
dust rules. Therefore, current rule
section R307–1–4.5 will remain in the
existing SIP.
8. Utah’s September 20, 1999 SIP
submittal that recodifies Utah’s rules
includes rules R307–150 titled
‘‘Periodic Inventories’’ and rule R307–
155 titled ‘‘Emission Inventories’’.
Utah’s rule section R307–150 has been
superseded and replaced by Utah’s
February 5, 2001 SIP which we are
specifically acting on approving in this
action for rule section R307–150–1 (see
III.A.2. above) and Utah’s rule section
R307–150–2 and R307–155 will be
addressed at a later date when EPA
takes action on Utah’s October 9, 1998
SIP submittal. Therefore, current rule
R307–1–3.1.7 which would have been
renumbered to R307–150–2 and current
rule R307–1–3.5 which would have
been renumbered to R307–155 will
remain in the existing SIP.
9. Rule R307–301—Utah and Weber
Counties: Oxygenated Gasoline Program
(previously found under R307–8). We
will not be acting on this rule section in
this action. This rule section will be
addressed when EPA addresses Utah’s
April 1, 2004 SIP submittal in which
UDAQ requested that EPA remove this
rule language from Utah’s current SIP.
10. Utah’s September 20, 1999 SIP
submittal that recodifies Utah’s rules
includes rules R307–302–2(4) and
R307–302–3 which we will not be
acting on in this action. Rule section
R307–302–2(4) has never been approved
into the SIP and is not required to be in
the federally enforceable SIP. In a letter
to UDAQ from EPA, dated October 6,
2000, EPA informed UDAQ that if a
PM10 nonattainment area attained the
standard with at least 3 years of clean
air quality data, and as long as that area
continues to attain the standard, the
section 172(c)(9) contingency measure
requirement will not apply. Rule section
R307–302–3 will be addressed when
EPA addresses Utah’s April 1, 2004 SIP
submittal.
11. R307–401—Permit: Notice of
Intent and Approval Order. We will not
be addressing the renumbering of rules
R307–401–1 through R307–401–8 and
R307–401–11 in this action. These rule
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
59688
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 197 / Thursday, October 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
sections have been superseded and
replaced by Utah’s October 9, 1998 SIP
submittal which EPA will be addressing
at a later date. Therefore, current rule
sections R307–1–3.1.1, R307–1–3.1.2,
R307–1–3.1.3, R307–1–3.1.4, R307–1–
3.1.5, R307–1–3.1.6, R307–1–3.1.8,
R307–1–3.1.9, and R307–1–3.1.10
which would have been renumbered to
rule section R307–401 will remain in
the existing SIP. We will also not be
acting to approve R307–401–10(2). Rule
section R307–401–10(2) has never been
approved into the SIP and is not
required to be in the federally
enforceable SIP.
12. R307–413—Permits: Exemption
and Special Provisions. We will not be
addressing the renumbering of rules
R307–413–1 through R307–413–6.
These rule sections will be addressed
when EPA addresses Utah’s October 9,
1998 SIP submittal. We will also not be
addressing rules R307–413–8 and R308–
413–9 because these rule sections will
be addressed when EPA addresses
Utah’s January 8, 1999 SIP submittal.
Therefore, the definitions that would
have been relocated to rule section
R307–413 will remain in the current
rule section R307–1–1 and current rule
section R307–1–3.1.7 and rule section
R307–6–1 that would have been
renumbered to rule section R307–413
will remain in the existing SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this proposed
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and therefore is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This proposed action merely
proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies
that this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
proposes to approve pre-existing
requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable
duty beyond that required by state law,
it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Oct 12, 2005
Jkt 208001
This proposed rule also does not have
tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This proposed rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission;
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This proposed
rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Carbon Monoxide, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic
compounds, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Dated: September 30, 2005.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 05–20518 Filed 10–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R03–OAR–2005–MD–0012; FRL–7982–8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Ambient Air Quality
Standard for Ozone and Fine
Particulate Matter
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Maryland
Department of the Environment. The
revision consists of modifications to the
ambient air quality standards for ozone
and fine particulate matter and the
replacement of the abbreviation ‘‘ppm’’
with parts per million in existing
standards. This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the
Act).
Written comments must be
received on or before November 14,
2005.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R03–OAR–
2005–MD–0012 by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ RME, EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Campbell.dave@epa.gov.
Mail: R03–OAR–2005–MD–0012,
David Campbell, Chief, Air Quality
Planning and Analysis Branch,
Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.
Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
RME ID No. R03–OAR–2005–MD–0012.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 197 (Thursday, October 13, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59681-59688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20518]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[RME Docket No. R08-OAR-2005-UT-0001, FRL-7983-2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Utah; Rules Recodification
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the Governor of Utah on September 20, 1999 and
February 5, 2001. The September 20, 1999 submittal revises the
numbering and format of the Utah Administrative Code (UAC) rules within
Utah's SIP. The February 5, 2001 submittal restores a paragraph that
was inadvertently deleted from Utah's rules when the State submitted
their September 20, 1999 SIP submittal that renumbered the UAC rules.
The intended effect of this action is to make these provisions
federally enforceable. In addition, the approval of Utah's September
20, 1999 SIP revision supersedes and replaces previous SIP revisions
submitted by Utah on October 26, 2000, September 7, 1999, two SIP
revisions submitted February 6, 1996, and one submitted on January 27,
1995. Some of the provisions of the rules submitted in Utah's SIP
revisions will be addressed at a later date by more recent SIP actions
that have been submitted which supersede and replace the earlier SIP
submittal actions. EPA will be removing Utah's Asbestos Work Practices,
Contractor Certification, AHERA Accreditation and AHERA Implementation
rule R307-1-8 and Eligibility of Pollution Control Expenditures for
Sales Tax Exemption rule R307-1-6 from Utah's federally enforceable SIP
because these rules are not generally related to attainment of the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and are therefore not
required to be in Utah's SIP. Finally, EPA will be removing Utah's
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants rule R307-1-
4.12. Utah has delegation of authority for NESHAPs in 40 CFR part 61
(49 FR 36368), pursuant to 110(k)(6) of the Act, therefore we are
removing the existing language (R307-1-4.12) that was approved into
Utah's current SIP because it is no longer required to be in the SIP.
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 14, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. R08-OAR-
2005-UT-0001, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Website: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/index.jsp.
Regional Materials in EDOCKET (RME), EPA's electronic public docket and
comment system for regional actions, is EPA's preferred method for
receiving comments. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
E-mail: long.richard@epa.gov and faulk.libby@epa.gov.
Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please alert the individual listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing comments).
Mail: Richard R. Long, Director, Air and Radiation
Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-
AR, 999 18th Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466.
Hand Delivery: Richard R. Long, Director, Air and
Radiation Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
Mailcode 8P-AR, 999 18th Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado 80202-
2466. Such deliveries are only accepted Monday through Friday, 8 a.m.
to 4:55 p.m., excluding federal holidays. Special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. R08-OAR-2005-
UT-0001. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available at https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/index.jsp, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through EDOCKET,
regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA's Regional Materials in EDOCKET and
federal regulations.gov website are ``anonymous access'' systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA, without going through EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your
e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit EDOCKET online or see the
Federal Register of May 31, 2002 (67 FR 38102). For additional
instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I. General
Information of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the Regional
Materials in EDOCKET index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/index.jsp.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information whose
[[Page 59682]]
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in Regional Materials in
EDOCKET or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 200, Denver,
Colorado 80202-2466. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy of the
docket Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Libby Faulk, EPA, Region 8, 999 18th
Street, Ste. 200 (8P-AR), Denver, CO, 80202-2466, (303) 312-6083,
faulk.libby@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we'',
``us'', or ``our'' are used, we mean the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. What Is the Purpose of this Proposed Action?
III. Utah Rules EPA is Proposing to Act On
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review
I. General Information
Definitions--For the purpose of this document, we are giving
meaning to certain words or initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air
Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words State mean the State of Utah, unless the context
indicates otherwise.
A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
Regional Materials in EDOCKET, regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside
of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the comment that includes
information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain
the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
I. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
II. Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
III. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
IV. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
V. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
VI. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
VII. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
II. What Is the Purpose of This Proposed Action?
In this document we are addressing seven State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revisions, submitted by the Governor of Utah dated: February 5,
2001, October 26, 2000, September 20, 1999, September 7, 1999, two SIP
revisions submitted February 6, 1996, and one submitted on January 27,
1995. These SIP revisions modify the Utah Administrative Code (UAC)
rules within Utah's SIP. Each of these SIP submittals is described in
more detail below.
The September 20, 1999 submittal revises the numbering and format
of the UAC rules within Utah's SIP. The renumbering and reformatting of
the UAC rules within Utah's SIP provides for a more consistent
numbering system and a coherent structure allowing provisions to be
located more easily within Utah's rules. Some provisions of the rules
submitted in Utah's September 20, 1999 SIP revision will be addressed
at a later date.
We are not acting on a portion of Utah's September 7, 1999 SIP
submittal that deletes rule R307-150-1 (existing rule number R307-1-
2.2) and rule R307-150-2 (existing rule number R307-1-3.1.7) because
the renumbering of these rules have never been approved into the SIP
and have since been superseded and replaced by Utah's February 5, 2001
and October 9, 1998 SIP submittals'. Rule R307-150-1 is restored to its
appropriate rule section in Utah's February 5, 2001 SIP submittal which
we'll be acting on in this action. The February 5, 2001 submittal
contains a non-substantive change to correct a minor change that was
submitted in the September 20, 1999 submittal that inadvertently
deleted rule R307-102-1(2) from Utah's rules and moved the rule to
R307-150-1. Rule renumbering R307-150-2 will not be addressed in this
action because it will be addressed at a later date when EPA addresses
Utah's October 9, 1998 SIP submittal. Therefore, the existing rule
R307-1-3.7 which would have been renumbered to R307-150-2 will remain
in Utah's SIP.
We are proposing to not act on Utah's February 6, 1996 SIP
submittal that pertains to Utah's rule R307-2 and portions of Utah's
February 6, 1996 SIP submittal that pertains to rule R307-1-4. These
SIP submittals, and portions thereof, are superseded and replaced by
Utah's September 20, 1999 SIP submittal.
We are proposing to act on a portion of Utah's January 27, 1995 SIP
submittal that pertains to Utah's rules R307-1-2.3.2. Utah's rule R307-
1-2.3.2 adds a reference to Utah's Code to clarify where to find
further information regarding Utah's variance rule. We will not be
addressing Utah's revisions to rule R307-1-3.1.4 or R307-1-3.2.3.
Utah's rule R307-1-3.1.4 will be addressed at a later date when EPA
addresses Utah's October 9, 1998 SIP submittal. Therefore, rule R307-1-
3.1.4 will remain in the current SIP. Utah's rule R307-1-3.2.3 will be
addressed at a later date when EPA addresses Utah's PM10 maintenance
plan for Utah and Salt Lake County. Therefore, Utah's rule R307-1-3.2.3
will remain in the current SIP.
Finally, we are acting on removing Utah's asbestos rule R307-1-8
from Utah's federally enforceable SIP because the rule is not generally
related to attainment of the NAAQS and is therefore, not appropriate to
be in Utah's SIP. We are also proposing to not act on Utah's October
26, 2000 SIP submittal because the SIP pertains to changes being made
to Utah's asbestos rule R307-1-8 that we are removing from Utah's SIP
in this action. EPA informed UDAQ of our intent to not act on Utah's
October 26, 2000 SIP submittal and our intent to remove existing
asbestos rule language (R307-
[[Page 59683]]
1-8) from Utah's federally approved SIP in a letter to UDAQ, dated
April 2, 2002.
By this action, EPA has reviewed the Utah Department of Air
Quality's (UDAQ) SIP submittals and found that these SIP submittals
only renumber and restructure UDAQ's rules. EPA has not reviewed the
substance of these rules as part of this action; EPA approved these
state rules into the SIP in previous rulemakings. The EPA is now merely
approving the renumbering system submitted by the State. The current
version of UDAQ's rules does not contain substantive changes from the
prior codification that we approved into the SIP. EPA acknowledges that
there are ongoing discussions with Utah to address EPA's concerns with
some rule language that EPA previously approved into the Utah SIP. In
an April 18, 2002 letter from Richard Sprott, Director of Utah's
Division of Air Quality, to Richard Long, Director of the Air and
Radiation Program in EPA Region 8, UDAQ committed to work with us to
address our concerns with the Utah SIP. Because the SIP submittals only
restructure and renumber the existing SIP-approved regulations, contain
no substantive changes, and UDAQ has committed to address EPA's
concerns, we believe it is appropriate to propose to approve the
submittal. Approving the restructured and renumbered Utah rules into
the SIP will also facilitate future discussions on the rules. EPA will
continue to require the State to correct any rule deficiencies despite
EPA's approval of this recodificiation.
The specific changes being proposed in this action are explained in
more detail below (see III.A., III.B., and III.C.).
III. Utah Rules EPA Is Proposing To Act On
We reviewed Utah's seven submittals and placed each rule section
into a category based on the changes that were made in the rule and/or
our action on the rule. The first category (see III.A. below) consists
of those rules (and all subsections of the rule) which have been
recodified and contain non-substantive changes to the text of the rule.
We are proposing to approve the recodified rules and the non-
substantive changes. The second category (see III.B. below) consists of
rules (and all subsections of the rule) that we are proposing to take
no action on or are acting to remove the rule language from Utah's SIP.
The rule(s) listed under category two have either never been approved
into the SIP or have been approved into the SIP and are not appropriate
to be in the federally approved SIP because the rule is not generally
related to attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). The third category (see III.C. below) consists of rules (and
all subsections of the rule) that have been superseded and replaced by
other Utah SIP submittals that recodifies Utah's rules or consists of
rule(s) (and all subsections of the rule) that we will be addressing at
a later date.
A. Category 1
We are proposing to approve the following rule changes of the Utah
Air Quality Rules because the rules have only been renumbered, contain
non-substantive changes to the rule that do not effect the meaning of
the rule and/or have been modified to move definitions that have
already been approved into the SIP to specific rule sections in which
the definitions apply. These renumbered rules and all subsections
within these rules supersede and replace the prior numbered rules and
subsections in Utah's federally approved SIP. These rule changes were
submitted under UDAQ's SIP submittals dated January 27, 1995, September
7, 1999, September 20, 1999, and February 5, 2001. Any SIP revision
submitted by the State after February 5, 2001 that is not addressed in
this notice and has been approved by EPA will remain effective in the
SIP and will not be replaced by this action.
1. Rule R307-101--General Requirements (previously found under
R307-1). This section contains UDAQ's Forward and Definitions that
apply to Utah's air quality rules. We are approving the renumbering of
this rule section and all subsections of this rule with the exception
of the definitions for ``actual emissions,'' ``major modification,''
``Part 70 Source,'' ``significant,'' and ``volatile organic compound.''
(See III.B.1.a. and b. below). R307-101 has only been renumbered and
contains no changes to the language of the rule that would affect the
meaning of the rule. UDAQ relocated some definitions from rule R307-101
to specific rule sections throughout Utah's rules to better coordinate
specific definitions that apply in specific rule sections. The
definitions that were relocated to other rule sections contain no
changes to the language that would affect the meaning of the rule.
2. Rule R307-102--General Requirements: Broadly Applicable
Requirements (previously found under R307-1-2.1, R307-1-2.3, R307-
1.2.5, and R307-1-4.8). We are approving the renumbering of this rule
section and all subsections of this rule that were submitted in Utah's
September 20, 1999 and February 5, 2001 SIP submittals''. In Utah's
September 20, 1999 SIP submittal Utah inadvertently moved rule R307-1-
2.2 to rule section R307-150-1 (State effective September 15, 1998).
When Utah realized their error, Utah submitted a SIP revision, dated
September 7, 1999 (State effective March 4, 1999), deleting the rule
from R307-150-1 and submitted a new SIP revision, dated February 5,
2001 (State effective August 3, 2000), that relocated the original rule
R307-1-2.2 that was inadvertently moved to R307-150-1 to its
appropriate location under the new numbering R307-102-1. We are also
acting to approve a portion of Utah's January 27, 1995 SIP submittal
that pertains to rule R307-1-2.3.1 which in this action is being
renumbered to R307-102-4(1) through the approval of Utah's September
20, 1999 SIP submittal. Utah's January 27, 1995 SIP submittal that
pertains to rule R307-1-2.3.2 (renumbered under this action as R307-
102-4(1)) added a reference to Utah's code 19-2-113 clarifying where to
find further information regarding applications for variances. EPA
considers this change to be a non-substantive change that does not
affect the meaning of the rule and is therefore being approved. EPA is
also approving rule R307-102-6 which adds language to clarify that
should there be more stringent controls listed within Utah's R307
rules, those requirements must be met. EPA considers this change to be
a non-substantive change that does not affect the meaning of the rule,
but simply clarifies rules which should be met within the SIP.
3. Rule R307-105--General Requirements: Emergency Controls
(previously found under R307-1-5.1 through R307-1-5.4). We are
approving the renumbering of this rule section and all subsections of
this rule. Rule R307-105 and all subsections of the rule have only been
renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
4. Rule R307-107--General Requirements: Unavoidable Breakdown
(previously found under R307-1-4.7 through R307-1-4.7.4). We are
approving the renumbering of this rule section and all subsections of
this rule. Rule R307-107-1 through R307-4 and all subsections of the
rule have only been renumbered and contain no changes to the language
of the rule that would affect the meaning of the rule. We are also
approving the addition of rule R307-107-6 which adds language to
clarify that should there be more stringent controls listed within
Utah's R307 rules, those requirements must be met. EPA considers this
change to be a non-substantive change that does not
[[Page 59684]]
affect the meaning of the rule but simply clarifies rules which should
be met within the SIP.
5. Rule R307-110--General Requirements: State Implementation Plan
(previously found under R307-2). We are approving the renumbering and
adoption of the following rules because the rules have only been
renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the rule that
would effect the meaning of the rule: R307-110-1 through R307-110-9,
R307-110-11, R307-110-13 through R307-110-15, R307-110-18, R307-110-20
through R307-110-28, R307-110-30, and R307-110-32. EPA will not be
addressing the remainder of rule section R307-110 for reasons discussed
under III.C.4. below.
6. Rule R307-115--General Conformity (previously found under R307-
19). We are approving the renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. Rule R307-115 and all subsections of the rule
have only been renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the
rule that would affect the meaning of the rule.
7. Rule R307-130--General Penalty Policy (previously found under
R307-4-1 through R307-4-4). We are approving the renumbering of this
rule section and all subsections of this rule. Rule R307-130 and all
subsections of the rule have only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that would affect the meaning of
the rule.
8. Rule R307-165--Emission Testing (previously found under R307-1-
3.4.1 through R307-1-3.4.4). We are approving the renumbering of this
rule section and all subsections of this rule. Rule R307-165 and all
subsections of the rule have only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that would affect the meaning of
the rule.
9. Rule R307-201--Emission Standards: General Emission Standards
(previously found under R307-1-4.1, R307-1-4.9, R307-1-4.13.2, and
R307-4.1.2 through R307-4.1.9). We are approving the renumbering of
this rule section and all subsections of this rule. Rule R307-201 and
all subsections of the rule have only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that would affect the meaning of
the rule.
10. Rule R307-202--Emission Standards: General Burning (previously
found under R307-1-2.4 through R307-1-2.4.5). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all subsections of this rule. Rule
R307-202 and all subsections of the rule have only been renumbered and
contain no changes to the language of the rule that would affect the
meaning of the rule.
11. Rule R307-203--Emission Standards: Sulfur Content of Fuels
(previously found under R307-1-4.2 and R307-1-4.13.1). We are approving
the renumbering of this rule section and all subsections of this rule.
Rule R307-203 and all subsections of the rule have only been renumbered
and contain no changes to the language of the rule that would affect
the meaning of the rule. EPA is also approving rule R307-203-3 which
adds language to clarify that should there be more stringent controls
listed within Utah's R307 rules, those requirements must be met. EPA
considers this change to be a non-substantive change that does not
affect the meaning of the rule, but simply clarifies rules which should
be met within the SIP.
12. Rule R307-206--Emission Standards: Abrasive Blasting
(previously found under R307-1-4.10.1, 2 and 3). We are approving the
renumbering of this rule section and all subsections of this rule. Rule
R307-206 and all subsections of the rule have only been renumbered and
contain no changes to the language of the rule that would affect the
meaning of the rule. EPA is also approving the addition of rule R307-
206-1 which includes definitions that are already approved in the
existing SIP. EPA is also approving rule R307-206-5 which adds language
to clarify that should there be more stringent controls listed within
Utah's R307 rules, those requirements must be met. EPA considers these
changes to be a non-substantive change that does not affect the meaning
of the rule but simply clarifies rules which should be met within the
SIP.
13. Rule R307-302--Davis, Salt Lake, Utah Counties: Residential
Fireplaces and Stoves (previously found under R307-1-4.13.3). We are
approving the renumbering of this rule section and all subsections of
this rule with the exception of rule section R307-302-2(4) and R307-
302-3 (see III.C.10. below). EPA is also approving the addition of rule
R307-302-1 which includes definitions that are already approved in the
existing SIP. The remainder of rule R307-302 and all subsections of the
rule have only been renumbered and contain no changes to the language
of the rule that would affect the meaning of the rule.
14. Rule R307-305--Davis, Salt Lake and Utah Counties and Ogden
City, and Nonattainment Areas for PM10: Particulates (previously found
under R307-1-4.1.1, R307-1-3.2.1 through R307-1-3.2.6). We are
approving the renumbering of this rule section and all subsections of
this rule. Rule R307-305 and all subsections of the rule have only been
renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule. In addition to the approval of
renumbering of rule R307-305, EPA is retaining Utah's rule R307-1-
3.2.3. Utah submitted a SIP revision, dated January 27, 1995,
requesting the deletion of rule R307-1-3.2.3(E) which EPA will be
addressing at a later date; therefore, this rule will remain in the
current SIP.
15. Rule R307-307--Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties: Road
Salting and Sanding (previously found under R307-1-3.2.7.A, B and C).
We are approving the renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. Rule R307-307 and all subsections of the rule
have only been renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the
rule that would affect the meaning of the rule.
16. Rule R307-325--Davis and Salt Lake counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Ozone Provisions (previously found under R307-1-
4.9.8 and R307-14-1.F). We are approving the renumbering of this rule
section and all subsections of this rule. Rule R307-325 and all
subsections of the rule have only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that would affect the meaning of
the rule.
17. Rule R307-326--Davis and Salt Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions in Refineries
(previously found under R307-1-4.9.3). We are approving the renumbering
of this rule section and all subsections of this rule. EPA is also
approving the addition of rule R307-326-1 which includes definitions
that are already approved in the existing SIP. Rule R307-326 and all
subsections of the rule have only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that would affect the meaning of
the rule.
18. Rule R307-327--Davis and Salt Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Petroleum Liquid Storage (previously found under
R307-1-4.9.1). We are approving the renumbering of this rule section
and all subsections of this rule. EPA is also approving the addition of
rule R307-327-1(2) which includes definitions that are already approved
in the existing SIP. Rule R307-327 and all subsections of the rule have
only been renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the rule
that would affect the meaning of the rule.
19. Rule R307-328--Davis and Salt Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Gasoline Transfer and Storage (previously found
under R307-1-4.9.2). We are approving the renumbering of this rule
section and all
[[Page 59685]]
subsections of this rule. EPA is also approving the addition of rule
R307-328-1 which includes definitions that are already approved in the
existing SIP. Rule R307-328 and all subsections of the rule have only
been renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
20. Rule R307-335--Davis and Salt Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Degreasing and Solvent Cleaning Operations
(previously found under R307-1-4.9.4). We are approving the renumbering
of this rule section and all subsections of this rule. EPA is also
approving the addition of rule R307-335-1 which includes definitions
that are already approved in the existing SIP. Rule R307-335 and all
subsections of the rule have only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that would affect the meaning of
the rule.
21. Rule R307-340 Davis and Salt Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Surface Coating Processes (previously found under
R307-1-4.9.6). We are approving the renumbering of this rule section
and all subsections of this rule. EPA is also approving the addition of
rule R307-340-1 which includes definitions that are already approved in
the existing SIP. Rule R307-340 and all subsections of the rule have
only been renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the rule
that would affect the meaning of the rule.
22. Rule R307-341--Davis and Salt Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Cutback Asphalt (previously found under R307-1-
4.9.5). EPA is also approving the addition of rule R307-341-1 which
includes definitions that are already approved in the existing SIP. We
are approving the renumbering of this rule section and all subsections
of this rule. Rule R307-341 and all subsections of the rule have only
been renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
23. Rule R307-342--Davis and Salt Lake Counties and Ozone
Nonattainment Areas: Qualification of Contractors, Test Procedures for
Testing of Vapor Recovery Systems for Gasoline Delivery Tanks
(previously found under R307-3). We are approving the renumbering of
this rule section and all subsections of this rule. Rule R307-342 and
all subsections of the rule have only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that would affect the meaning of
the rule.
24. Rule R307-401--Permit: Notice of Intent and Approval Order. In
this action we are acting only to approve the recodification of
subsections R307-401-9 and R307-401-10(1) (previously found under R307-
1-3.1.11 and 12). All subsections of rule R307-401-9 and R307-401-10(1)
have only been renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the
rule that would affect the meaning of the rule. For EPA's action on the
remainder of the rules located under R307-401 (see III.C.11 below).
25. Rule R307-403 `` Permits: New and Modified Sources in
Nonattainment Areas and Maintenance Areas (previously found under R307-
1-3.3). We are approving the renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. EPA is also approving the addition of rule
R307-403-1 which includes definitions that are already approved in the
existing SIP. Rule R307-403 and all subsections of the rule have only
been renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
26. Rule R307-405--Permits: Prevention of Significant Deterioration
of Air Quality (PSD) (previously found under R307-1-3.6). We are
approving the renumbering of this rule section and all subsections of
this rule. EPA is also approving the addition of rule R307-405-1 which
includes definitions that are already approved in the existing SIP.
Rule R307-405 and all subsections of the rule have only been renumbered
and contain no changes to the language of the rule that would affect
the meaning of the rule.
27. Rule R307-406--Visibility (previously found under R307-1-3.10).
We are approving the renumbering of this rule section and all
subsections of this rule. EPA is also approving the addition of rule
R307-406-1 which includes definitions that are already approved in the
existing SIP. Rule R307-406 and all subsections of the rule have only
been renumbered and contain no changes to the language of the rule that
would affect the meaning of the rule.
28. Rule R307-413--Permits: Exemption and Special Provisions
(previously found under R307-7-2 and 3). In this action we are
approving the recodification of rule R307-413-7 (previously found under
R307-7-2 and 3). Rule R307-413-7 has only been renumbered and contains
no changes to the language of the rule that would affect the meaning of
the rule. We will not be acting on rule sections R307-413-1 through
R307-413-6, R307-413-8 and R307-413-9 for the reasons explained in
III.C.12. below.
29. Rule R307-414--Permits: Fees for Approval Orders (previously
found under R307-1-3.9). We are approving the renumbering of this rule
section and all subsections of this rule. Rule R307-414 and all
subsections of the rule have only been renumbered and contain no
changes to the language of the rule that would affect the meaning of
the rule.
B. Category 2
Category two consists of some of Utah's rules (and includes all
subsections of the rule) that we are not acting on approving into the
SIP or are acting to remove the rule language from the SIP and a
discussion of why we believe we cannot act to approve the rules in the
SIP. These rule changes were submitted by UDAQ on January 27, 1995,
September 20, 1999, and October 26, 2000.
1. We will not be acting on the following rule definition(s) into
Utah's SIP either because the definition(s) is not required to be
approved into Utah's SIP or because the definition(s) has been
superseded and replaced by more recent SIP submittal actions and will
therefore be addressed in those actions:
a. Utah's September 20, 1999 SIP submittal wherein Utah recodified
Utah's rules included the definition ``Part 70 Source.'' We will not be
approving this definition in this action. This definition has never
been approved into Utah's SIP and is not required to be in Utah's SIP.
b. Utah's September 20, 1999 SIP submittal wherein Utah recodified
Utah's rules included the definition ``actual emissions,'' ``major
modification,'' ``significant'' and ``volatile organic compound.'' The
``actual emissions'' and ``major modification'' definitions have been
revised by the State and were approved by EPA August 19, 2004 (69 FR
51368). The ``significant'' and ``volatile organic compound''
definitions have been revised by the State and were approved by EPA on
February 21, 2002 (67 FR 7961).
2. R307-121--General Requirements: Eligibility of Expenditures for
Purchase of Vehicles that Use Cleaner Burning Fuels or Conversion of
Vehicles and Special Fuel Mobile Equipment to Use Cleaner Burning Fuels
for Corporate and Individual Income Tax Credits. This rule section has
never been approved into Utah's SIP. We are not taking action to
incorporate rule R307-121 that pertains to corporate and individual
income tax credit into the SIP because the provisions of R307-122 are
not generally related to attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS. In a
letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA's
action to not
[[Page 59686]]
approve this rule section into Utah's SIP.
3. R307-122--General Requirements: Eligibility of Expenditures for
Purchase and Installation Costs of Fireplaces and Wood Stoves that Use
Cleaner Burning Fuels. This rule section has never been approved into
Utah's SIP. We are not taking action to incorporate rule R307-122 into
the SIP that pertains to tax credit because the provisions of R307-122
are not generally related to attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS. In
a letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA's
action to not approve this rule section into Utah's SIP.
4. R307-135--Enforcement Response Policy for Asbestos Hazard
Emergency Response Act. We are not taking action to incorporate rule
R307-135 (formerly R307-4-5 through R307-4-11 in Utah's State rules)
into the SIP because provisions of R307-135 are not generally related
to attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS and have never been approved
into Utah's SIP. Rule R307-135 provisions implement requirements from
the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) of 1986, while SIP
rules implement Clean Air Act (CAA) Title I provisions. In a letter to
EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA's action to
not approve this rule section into Utah's SIP.
5. R307-214--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants. Rule R307-214 (formerly rule R307-10 in Utah's State rules)
is the rule the State uses to implement our national emission standards
for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPs) regulations in 40 CFR part 61.
Given that the State has delegation of authority for NESHAPs in 40 CFR
part 61 (49 FR 36368), pursuant to 110(k)(6) of the Act, we are not
approving the new codification of R307-214 into the SIP and are
removing existing language that was approved into Utah's current SIP,
rule R307-1-4.12, for the same reason stated above. In a letter to EPA
from the UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA's action to
not approve this rule section into Utah's SIP.
6. R307-215--Emission Standards: Acid Rain Requirements. We are not
taking action to incorporate rule R307-215 (formerly R307-16-02 in
Utah's State rules) into the SIP. The provisions of R307-215 have never
been approved into Utah's SIP and are not required to be incorporated
into the SIP. Rule R307-215 incorporates by reference Acid Rain
NOX emission limitation requirements (40 CFR Part 76) from
Title IV of the CAA, while SIP rules implement CAA Title I provisions.
In a letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with
EPA's action to not approve this rule section into Utah's SIP.
7. R307-220--Emission Standards: Plan for Designated Facilities. On
October 3, 2002, the State adopted rules for Plans for Designated
Facilities. We believe we have no legal basis in the Act for approving
Utah's rule for Plans for Designated Facilities, rule R307-220, into
the SIP because these rules are not generally related to attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS and have never been approved into Utah's SIP.
Therefore, we are not taking action to incorporate R307-220 into Utah's
SIP. However, on January 14, 1998 (63 FR 2156), we did approve these
rules as meeting section 111(d) of the Act. See 40 CFR 62.11110-11112.
In a letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with
EPA's action to not approve this rule section into Utah's SIP.
8. R307-221--Emission Standards: Emission Controls for Existing
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. On September 3, 1999, the State
adopted rules for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. We believe we have
no legal basis in the Act for approving Utah's rule for Municipal Solid
Waste Landfills, rule R307-221, into the SIP because these rules are
not generally related to attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS and
have never been approved into Utah's SIP. Therefore, we are not taking
action to incorporate R307-221 into the SIP. However, on January 14,
1998 (63 FR 2156), we did approve these rules as meeting section 111(d)
of the Act. See 40 CFR 62.11110-11112. In a letter to EPA from UDAQ,
dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA's action to not approve this
rule section into Utah's SIP.
9. R307-320--Davis, Salt Lake and Utah Counties, and Ogden City:
Employer Based Trip Reduction Program. We are not acting to approve
rule section R307-320 into the SIP. Rule R307-320 has never been
approved into Utah's SIP and is not required to be incorporated into
the SIP. In a letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed
with EPA's action to not approve this rule section into Utah's SIP.
10. R307-332--Davis and Salt Lake Counties and Ozone Nonattainment
Areas: Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems. Rule R307-332 (formerly R307-
14-10 in Utah's State rules) had never been approved into the Utah SIP.
On April 6, 1994 (59 FR 16262) EPA removed the requirements of this
rule for ``moderate'' and ``attainment'' areas, and the rule was
preserved among the State air quality rules for the eventuality that
Davis and Salt Lake Counties would become a non-attainment area.
However, since 1994 more effective methods have emerged to achieve
meeting the NAAQS if Davis and Salt Lake County should become a
nonattainment area, therefore, we are not taking action to incorporate
this rule section into the SIP. In a letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated
April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA's action to not approve this rule
section into Utah's SIP.
11. R307-410--Permits: Emissions Impact Analysis. We will not be
acting to approve the renumbering of rule section R307-410. Revisions
were made to this rule section by Utah and submitted to EPA in a SIP
submittal, dated November 20, 1996 and May 12, 1998, and were
subsequently withdrawn by Utah in a letter addressed to EPA, Regional
Administrator, William Yellowtail, dated October 16, 2000. Because
Utah's September 20, 1999 SIP, which reorganizes the States rules,
still includes the revisions that were made to R307-410 that were
ultimately withdrawn by the State, EPA cannot act to approve this rule
section. Therefore, the existing rules R307-1-3.7 will remain current
in the SIP.
12. R307-415--Permits: Operating Permit Requirements. We are not
taking action to incorporate rule R307-415 (formerly R307-15 in Utah's
State rules) into the SIP. Provisions of R307-415 have never been
approved into Utah's SIP and are not required to be approved into the
SIP. Rule R307-415 provisions implement operating permit program
requirements from Title V of the CAA, while SIP rules implement CAA
Title I provisions. In a letter to EPA from the UDAQ dated April 7,
2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA's action to not approve this rule section
into Utah's SIP.
13. R307-417--Permits: Acid Rain Sources. We are not taking action
to incorporate R307-417 (formerly R307-17-1 in Utah's State rules) into
the SIP. Provisions of R307-417 have never been approved into Utah's
SIP and are not required to be approved into the SIP. Rule R307-417
incorporates by reference Acid Rain permitting (40 CFR part 72)
requirements from Title IV of the CAA, while SIP rules implement the
CAA Title I provisions. In a letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7,
2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA's action to not approve this rule section
into Utah's SIP.
14. R307-1-6 (revised number R307-120)--General Requirements: Tax
Exemption for Air and Water Pollution Control Equipment. We are
removing from Utah's SIP rule R307-1-6 and all subsections of this
rule. EPA is also not
[[Page 59687]]
acting on approving the new recodified number for R307-1-6 which is
R307-120. This rule language pertains to State Sales Tax Exemptions for
Pollution Control Expenditures and is not generally related to
attainment of the NAAQS and is, therefore, not appropriate to be in
Utah's SIP. In a letter to EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ
agreed with EPA's action to remove rule R307-1-6 from Utah's SIP and to
not approve rule R307-120.
15. R307-1-8 (revised number R307-801)--Asbestos. We are removing
from Utah's SIP rule R307-1-8 and all subsections of this rule. EPA is
also not acting on approving the new recodified number for R307-1-8
which is R307-801. Finally, we are not acting on Utah's October 26,
2000 SIP submittal because the SIP pertains to changes being made to
Utah's asbestos rule R307-1-8 that we are removing from Utah's SIP in
this action. This rule language pertains to the regulation of asbestos
and is generally not related to attainment of the NAAQS; therefore, it
is not appropriate to be in Utah's SIP. EPA informed UDAQ of our intent
to not act on Utah's October 26, 2000 SIP submittal and our intent to
remove existing asbestos rule language (R307-1-8) from Utah's federally
approved SIP in a letter to UDAQ, dated April 2, 2002. In a letter to
EPA from UDAQ, dated April 7, 2005, UDAQ agreed with EPA's action to
remove rule R307-1-8 from Utah's SIP and to not approve rule R307-801.
C. Category 3
Category three consists of rule(s) (and all subsections of the
rule) that we will be addressing at a later date through other SIP
submittal revisions that Utah has or intends to submit that supersede
and replace the existing rules. These rule changes were submitted by
UDAQ on January 27, 1995, February 6, 1996, and September 20, 1999.
1. Utah's February 6, 1996 SIP submittal titled ``Expansion of
R307-2'' that recodified and expanded Utah's R307-2. We will not be
acting on this SIP submittal because the September 20, 1999 SIP
submittal that we are acting on in this notice supersedes and replaces
the February 6, 1996 SIP submittal and relocates rules that would have
been found under R307-2 to new rule section R307-110.
2. Portions of Utah's February 6, 1996 SIP submittal that
recodifies Utah's Emission Standards rule(s) that pertain to
subsections: R307-1-4.9 and R307-1-4.12. We will not be acting on these
specific rules within this SIP submittal because the September 20, 1999
SIP submittal that we are acting on in this notice supersedes and
replaces this revision and relocates rule R307-1-4.9 to rule section
R307-325 and rule R307-1-4.12 to rule section R307-203.
3. Utah's February 6, 1996 SIP submittal that recodifies Utah's
Emission Standards rule R307-1-4 that pertains to changes made in
subsection R307-1-4.6. We will not be acting on subsection R307-1-4.6
of this SIP submittal because this subsection has been superseded and
replaced in Utah's SIP submittal dated September 7, 1999 and February
11, 2003 and was approved by EPA on May 15, 2003 (68 FR 26210). Rule
R307-1-4.6 is now located under rule section R307-170.
4. Rule R307-110--General Requirements: State Implementation Plan.
We are not proposing to act on R307-110-10, R307-110-17, R307-110-19,
R307-110-33, and R307-110-35 because these rules were superseded by
more recent SIP submittal that have already been approved into Utah's
federally approved SIP (see 65 FR 37286, 67 FR 57744, and 67 FR 62891).
We are also not addressing rule R307-110-12, R307-110-31, R307-110-34,
and R307-110-35 because this rule section will be addressed when EPA
addresses Utah's April 1, 2004 and November 29, 2004 SIP submittals.
Therefore, the existing rule R307-2-12 that would have been renumbered
to R307-110-12 will remain in the SIP. We are also not acting to
approve R307-110-16 because Utah repealed this rule from the federally
approved SIP in their June 17, 1998 SIP submittal that EPA approved on
May 20, 2002 (67 FR 35442). We are not addressing rule R307-110-29
because this rule was revised in Utah's February 6, 1996 SIP submittal
which EPA will be addressing at a later date. Therefore, the existing
rule R307-2-18 that would have been renumbered to R307-110-29 will
remain in the SIP.
5. Utah's September 20, 1999 SIP submittal that recodifies Utah's
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems rule R307-170. We will not be
acting on this rule section of the September 20, 1999 SIP submittal
because this rule section was already approved by EPA on May 15, 2003
(68 FR 26210).
6. Utah's January 27, 1995 SIP submittal pertaining to rule R307-1-
3.1.4 which deletes a reference to unspecify other state, local and
federal requirements. We will not be addressing this specific rule
revision because the revision has been superseded and replaced by
Utah's October 9, 1998 SIP submittal which will be addressed at a later
date. Therefore, current rule section R307-1-3.1.4 will remain in the
existing SIP.
7. Utah's February 6, 1996 SIP submittal that recodifies Utah's
Emission Standards rule R307-1-4 that pertains to changes made in
subsection R307-1-4.5. We will not be addressing this rule section of
this SIP submittal. This rule section will be addressed at a later date
when the UDAQ submits revisions to UDAQ's September 20, 1999 SIP
submittal that pertains to Utah's fugitive emissions and fugitive dust
rules. Therefore, current rule section R307-1-4.5 will remain in the
existing SIP.
8. Utah's September 20, 1999 SIP submittal that recodifies Utah's
rules includes rules R307-150 titled ``Periodic Inventories'' and rule
R307-155 titled ``Emission Inventories''. Utah's rule section R307-150
has been superseded and replaced by Utah's February 5, 2001 SIP which
we are specifically acting on approving in this action for rule section
R307-150-1 (see III.A.2. above) and Utah's rule section R307-150-2 and
R307-155 will be addressed at a later date when EPA takes action on
Utah's October 9, 1998 SIP submittal. Therefore, current rule R307-1-
3.1.7 which would have been renumbered to R307-150-2 and current rule
R307-1-3.5 which would have been renumbered to R307-155 will remain in
the existing SIP.
9. Rule R307-301--Utah and Weber Counties: Oxygenated Gasoline
Program (previously found under R307-8). We will not be acting on this
rule section in this action. This rule section will be addressed when
EPA addresses Utah's April 1, 2004 SIP submittal in which UDAQ
requested that EPA remove this rule language from Utah's current SIP.
10. Utah's September 20, 1999 SIP submittal that recodifies Utah's
rules includes rules R307-302-2(4) and R307-302-3 which we will not be
acting on in this action. Rule section R307-302-2(4) has never been
approved into the SIP and is not required to be in the federally
enforceable SIP. In a letter to UDAQ from EPA, dated October 6, 2000,
EPA informed UDAQ that if a PM10 nonattainment area attained the
standard with at least 3 years of clean air quality data, and as long
as that area continues to attain the standard, the section 172(c)(9)
contingency measure requirement will not apply. Rule section R307-302-3
will be addressed when EPA addresses Utah's April 1, 2004 SIP
submittal.
11. R307-401--Permit: Notice of Intent and Approval Order. We will
not be addressing the renumbering of rules R307-401-1 through R307-401-
8 and R307-401-11 in this action. These rule
[[Page 59688]]
sections have been superseded and replaced by Utah's October 9, 1998
SIP submittal which EPA will be addressing at a later date. Therefore,
current rule sections R307-1-3.1.1, R307-1-3.1.2, R307-1-3.1.3, R307-1-
3.1.4, R307-1-3.1.5, R307-1-3.1.6, R307-1-3.1.8, R307-1-3.1.9, and
R307-1-3.1.10 which would have been renumbered to rule section R307-401
will remain in the existing SIP. We will also not be acting to approve
R307-401-10(2). Rule section R307-401-10(2) has never been approved
into the SIP and is not required to be in the federally enforceable
SIP.
12. R307-413--Permits: Exemption and Special Provisions. We will
not be addressing the renumbering of rules R307-413-1 through R307-413-
6. These rule sections will be addressed when EPA addresses Utah's
October 9, 1998 SIP submittal. We will also not be addressing rules
R307-413-8 and R308-413-9 because these rule sections will be addressed
when EPA addresses Utah's January 8, 1999 SIP submittal. Therefore, the
definitions that would have been relocated to rule section R307-413
will remain in the current rule section R307-1-1 and current rule
section R307-1-3.1.7 and rule section R307-6-1 that would have been
renumbered to rule section R307-413 will remain in the existing SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This
proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve pre-
existing requirements under state law and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does
not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect
small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Public Law 104-4).
This proposed rule also does not have tribal implications because
it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not
have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action
merely proposes to approve a state rule implementing a Federal
standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This
proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission; to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This proposed rule does
not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Carbon Monoxide, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic
compounds, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 30, 2005.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 05-20518 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P