Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 727C, 727-100, and 727-100C Series Airplanes, 59266-59268 [05-20075]
Download as PDF
59266
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1.—AFFECTED ELEVATOR PART NUMBERS AND SERIAL NUMBERS—Continued
Part
Right-hand elevator assembly
Affected part
numbers
F55280000001,
F55280000005
Inspections
(h) If the left- or right-hand elevator
assembly has a part number and serial
number combination identified in Table 1 of
this AD: Before further flight after
accomplishing paragraph (g) of this AD, do
the actions in paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), and
(h)(3) of this AD, as applicable.
(1) Perform an endoscopic inspection to
detect damage (such as a scratch, disbonding,
or a tear), and a tap test and a thermographic
inspection to detect signs of moisture
penetration, to the upper and lower elevator
panels on both sides of the airplane, in
accordance with the service bulletin.
(2) If any damage is found, before further
flight, do all applicable corrective actions
(including but not limited to repeating the
thermographic inspection to determine the
size of the damaged area, and performing a
tap test around the areas where moisture is
indicated), in accordance with the service
bulletin.
(3) Re-protect the elevator assembly
(including performing a general visual
inspection to determine if the drainage holes
are clean, a general visual inspection to
determine the condition of the sealant
covering the static discharges contour, and
applicable corrective actions), in accordance
with the service bulletin.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
general visual inspection is: ‘‘A visual
examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious
damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of
inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror
may be necessary to ensure visual access to
all surfaces in the inspection area. This level
of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as
daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or
opening of access panels or doors. Stands,
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.’’
Parts Installation
(i) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install, on any airplane, an
elevator assembly having a part number and
serial number combination identified in
Table 1 of this AD unless the actions required
by paragraph (h) of this AD are
accomplished.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Oct 11, 2005
Affected serial numbers
Jkt 208001
CG1002 through CG1094 inclusive, CG2001.
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
the appropriate principal inspector in the
FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding
District Office.
Related Information
(k) French airworthiness directive F–2004–
118 R1, dated October 13, 2004, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin
A330–55–3032, excluding Appendix 01,
dated December 22, 2003; or Airbus Service
Bulletin A340–55–4029, excluding Appendix
01, dated December 22, 2003; as applicable;
to perform the actions that are required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
The Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of these
documents in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Airbus, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France, for a copy of this service
information. You may review copies at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
Street SW., room PL–401, Nassif Building,
Washington, DC; on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at the NARA, call (202) 741–6030,
or go to https://www.archives.gov/federalregister/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 29, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–20064 Filed 10–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003–NM–238–AD; Amendment
39–14330; AD 2005–20–33]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 727, 727C, 727–100, and 727–
100C Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a
new airworthiness directive (AD),
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
applicable to certain Boeing Model 727,
727C, 727–100, and 727–100C series
airplanes. This AD requires repetitive
inspections of the frame inner chord,
outer chord, and web of the forward and
aft edge frames of the lower lobe
forward cargo door (FCD) cutout, and
corrective action if necessary. The
actions specified by this AD are
intended to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the forward and aft edge
frames of the lower lobe FCD cutout,
which could result in the loss of the
FCD and rapid decompression of the
airplane. This action is intended to
address the identified unsafe condition.
Effective November 16, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of a
certain publication listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of November
16, 2005.
DATES:
The service information
referenced in this AD may be obtained
from Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124–2207. This information may be
examined at the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel F. Kutz, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055–4056; telephone
(425) 917–6456; fax (425) 917–6590.
A
proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an airworthiness directive (AD)
that is applicable to certain Boeing
Model 727, 727C, 727–100, and 727–
100C series airplanes was published as
a supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register on August 22, 2005 (70 FR
48904). That action proposed to require
repetitive inspections of the frame inner
chord, outer chord, and web of the
forward and aft edge frames of the lower
lobe forward cargo door cutout, and
corrective action if necessary.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\12OCR1.SGM
12OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Clarification of Alternative Method of
Compliance (AMOC) Paragraph
We have revised this action to clarify
the appropriate procedure for notifying
the principal inspector before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comment received. The
commenter supports the supplemental
NPRM.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data, including the comments
received, and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described
previously. We have determined that
these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor
increase the scope of the AD.
Interim Action
We consider this final rule to be an
interim action. The manufacturer is
currently developing a modification that
will address the unsafe condition
identified in this AD. Once this
modification is developed, approved,
and available, we may consider
additional rulemaking.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 211
airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that
116 airplanes of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD, that it will take
approximately 6 to 8 work hours per
airplane to accomplish the required
inspections, and that the average labor
rate is $65 per work hour. Based on
these figures, the cost impact of the AD
on U.S. operators is estimated to be
between $45,240 and $60,320, or
between $390 and $520 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed
above is based on assumptions that no
operator has yet accomplished any of
the requirements of this AD action, and
that no operator would accomplish
those actions in the future if this AD
were not adopted. The cost impact
figures discussed in AD rulemaking
actions represent only the time
necessary to perform the specific actions
actually required by the AD. These
figures typically do not include
incidental costs, such as the time
required to gain access and close up,
planning time, or time necessitated by
other administrative actions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Oct 11, 2005
Jkt 208001
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, it is
determined that this final rule does not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this action (1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3)
will not have a significant economic
impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has
been prepared for this action and it is
contained in the Rules Docket. A copy
of it may be obtained from the Rules
Docket at the location provided under
the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59267
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
I
2005–20–33 Boeing: Amendment 39–14330.
Docket 2003–NM–238–AD.
Applicability: Model 727, 727C, 727–100,
and 727–100C series airplanes, line numbers
1 through 694 inclusive; certificated in any
category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless
accomplished previously.
To detect and correct fatigue cracking of
the forward and aft edge frames of the lower
lobe forward cargo door (FCD) cutout, which
could result in the loss of the FCD and rapid
decompression of the airplane, accomplish
the following:
Note 1: This AD is related to AD 98–11–
03 R1, amendment 39–10983, and affects
Structural Significant Item (SSI) F–11B of the
Boeing 727 Supplemental Structural
Inspection Document (SSID) program, D6–
48040–1, Revision H, dated June 1994.
Initial and Repetitive Inspections
(a) For airplanes on which the forward and
aft edge frames of the lower lobe FCD cutout
have not been inspected per AD 98–11–03 R1
as of the effective date of this AD: Prior to
the accumulation of 21,000 total flight cycles,
or within 3,000 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, do the inspections specified in
paragraph (c) of this AD.
(b) For airplanes on which the forward and
aft edge frames of the lower lobe FCD cutout
have been inspected per AD 98–11–03 R1 as
of the effective date of this AD: Within the
next scheduled inspection required by AD
98–11–03 R1, or within 3,000 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, do the inspections specified in
paragraph (c) of this AD.
(c) At the time specified in paragraph (a)
or paragraph (b) of this AD, as applicable:
Perform the detailed and high frequency
eddy current inspections for cracks in the
web and the inner and outer chords of the
forward and aft frames of the forward cargo
doorway in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 727–53A0229, dated March
24, 2005. Repeat the inspections thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles.
Corrective Action
(d) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (c) of this
AD: Before further flight, repair per a method
approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or according
to data meeting the certification basis of the
airplane approved by an Authorized
Representative for the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization
Organization who has been authorized by the
E:\FR\FM\12OCR1.SGM
12OCR1
59268
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those
findings. For a repair method to be approved,
the approval must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically reference this AD.
Certain Actions Constitute Compliance With
AD 98–11–03 R1
(e) Accomplishment of the inspections
specified in paragraph (c) of this AD is
terminating action for the inspections
required by AD 98–11–03 R1 that pertain to
SSI F–11B of Boeing Document D6–48040–1,
Boeing 727 SSID, Revision H, dated June
1994, for the areas specified in paragraph (c)
of this AD only. Accomplishment of the
actions required by paragraph (c) of this AD
does not terminate the inspections required
by AD 98–11–03 R1 for the remaining areas
of SSI F–11B and does not terminate the
remaining requirements of AD 98–11–03 R1.
No Reporting Required
(f) Although the service bulletin referenced
in this AD specifies to provide certain
information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(g)(1) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the
Manager, Seattle ACO, is authorized to
approve alternative methods of compliance
(AMOCs) for this AD.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Incorporation by Reference
(h) Unless otherwise specified in this AD,
the actions must be done in accordance with
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727–53A0229,
dated March 24, 2005. This incorporation by
reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To get copies of
this service information, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207. To inspect
copies of this service information, go to the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or to
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at the NARA,
call (202) 741–6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Effective Date
(i) This amendment becomes effective on
November 16, 2005.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 29, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–20075 Filed 10–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Oct 11, 2005
Jkt 208001
40 CFR Part 180
DC 20460–0001; telephone
number:(703) 308–9367; e-mail address:
Sec-18-Mailbox@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[OPP–2005–0260; FRL–7738–8]
I. General Information
Imidacloprid; Pesticide Tolerances for
Emergency Exemptions
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a
time-limited tolerance for the combined
residues of imidacloprid, (1-[6-chloro-3pyridinyl) methyl]-N-nitro-2imidazolidinimine) and its metabolites
containing the 6-chloropyridinyl
moiety, all expressed as parent in or on
pomegranates. This action is in response
to EPA’s granting of an emergency
exemption under section 18 of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizing
use of the pesticide on pomegranates.
This regulation establishes a maximum
permissible level for residues of
imidacloprid in this food commodity.
The tolerance will expire and is revoked
on December 31, 2008.
DATES: This regulation is effective
October 12, 2005. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before December 12, 2005.
ADDRESSES: To submit a written
objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in
Unit VII. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number OPP–2005–
0260. All documents in the docket are
listed in the EDOCKET index at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed
in the index, some information is not
publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the Public Information and
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm.
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Ertman, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111)
• Animal production (NAICS code
112)
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311)
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532)
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document and Other Related
Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET (https://
www.epa.gov/edocket/), you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A
frequently updated electronic version of
40 CFR part 180 is available on E-CFR
Beta Site Two at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
EPA, on its own initiative, in
accordance with sections 408(e) and 408
(l)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a,
is establishing a tolerance for the
combined residues of imidacloprid, (1[6-chloro-3-pyridinyl) methyl]-N-nitro2-imidazolidinimine) and its
metabolites containing the 6chloropyridinyl moiety, all expressed as
parent in or on pomegranates at 0.20
parts per million (ppm). This tolerance
will expire and is revoked on December
31, 2008. EPA will publish a document
in the Federal Register to remove the
revoked tolerance from the Code of
Federal Regulations.
E:\FR\FM\12OCR1.SGM
12OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59266-59268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20075]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003-NM-238-AD; Amendment 39-14330; AD 2005-20-33]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727, 727C, 727-100, and
727-100C Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Boeing Model 727, 727C, 727-100, and 727-100C
series airplanes. This AD requires repetitive inspections of the frame
inner chord, outer chord, and web of the forward and aft edge frames of
the lower lobe forward cargo door (FCD) cutout, and corrective action
if necessary. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect
and correct fatigue cracking of the forward and aft edge frames of the
lower lobe FCD cutout, which could result in the loss of the FCD and
rapid decompression of the airplane. This action is intended to address
the identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective November 16, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of November 16, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel F. Kutz, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
917-6456; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 727, 727C,
727-100, and 727-100C series airplanes was published as a supplemental
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register on August
22, 2005 (70 FR 48904). That action proposed to require repetitive
inspections of the frame inner chord, outer chord, and web of the
forward and aft edge frames of the lower lobe forward cargo door
cutout, and corrective action if necessary.
[[Page 59267]]
Clarification of Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) Paragraph
We have revised this action to clarify the appropriate procedure
for notifying the principal inspector before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comment received. The
commenter supports the supplemental NPRM.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Interim Action
We consider this final rule to be an interim action. The
manufacturer is currently developing a modification that will address
the unsafe condition identified in this AD. Once this modification is
developed, approved, and available, we may consider additional
rulemaking.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 211 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 116 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 6 to 8
work hours per airplane to accomplish the required inspections, and
that the average labor rate is $65 per work hour. Based on these
figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be
between $45,240 and $60,320, or between $390 and $520 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2005-20-33 Boeing: Amendment 39-14330. Docket 2003-NM-238-AD.
Applicability: Model 727, 727C, 727-100, and 727-100C series
airplanes, line numbers 1 through 694 inclusive; certificated in any
category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct fatigue cracking of the forward and aft
edge frames of the lower lobe forward cargo door (FCD) cutout, which
could result in the loss of the FCD and rapid decompression of the
airplane, accomplish the following:
Note 1: This AD is related to AD 98-11-03 R1, amendment 39-
10983, and affects Structural Significant Item (SSI) F-11B of the
Boeing 727 Supplemental Structural Inspection Document (SSID)
program, D6-48040-1, Revision H, dated June 1994.
Initial and Repetitive Inspections
(a) For airplanes on which the forward and aft edge frames of
the lower lobe FCD cutout have not been inspected per AD 98-11-03 R1
as of the effective date of this AD: Prior to the accumulation of
21,000 total flight cycles, or within 3,000 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do the
inspections specified in paragraph (c) of this AD.
(b) For airplanes on which the forward and aft edge frames of
the lower lobe FCD cutout have been inspected per AD 98-11-03 R1 as
of the effective date of this AD: Within the next scheduled
inspection required by AD 98-11-03 R1, or within 3,000 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, do the
inspections specified in paragraph (c) of this AD.
(c) At the time specified in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) of
this AD, as applicable: Perform the detailed and high frequency eddy
current inspections for cracks in the web and the inner and outer
chords of the forward and aft frames of the forward cargo doorway in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 727-53A0229, dated March 24, 2005. Repeat the
inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight
cycles.
Corrective Action
(d) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (c) of this AD: Before further flight, repair per a method
approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA; or according to data meeting the certification basis of
the airplane approved by an Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization Organization
who has been authorized by the
[[Page 59268]]
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the approval must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically reference this AD.
Certain Actions Constitute Compliance With AD 98-11-03 R1
(e) Accomplishment of the inspections specified in paragraph (c)
of this AD is terminating action for the inspections required by AD
98-11-03 R1 that pertain to SSI F-11B of Boeing Document D6-48040-1,
Boeing 727 SSID, Revision H, dated June 1994, for the areas
specified in paragraph (c) of this AD only. Accomplishment of the
actions required by paragraph (c) of this AD does not terminate the
inspections required by AD 98-11-03 R1 for the remaining areas of
SSI F-11B and does not terminate the remaining requirements of AD
98-11-03 R1.
No Reporting Required
(f) Although the service bulletin referenced in this AD
specifies to provide certain information to the manufacturer, this
AD does not include that requirement.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(g)(1) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, Seattle
ACO, is authorized to approve alternative methods of compliance
(AMOCs) for this AD.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Incorporation by Reference
(h) Unless otherwise specified in this AD, the actions must be
done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-53A0229,
dated March 24, 2005. This incorporation by reference was approved
by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To get copies of this service information,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. To inspect copies of this service
information, go to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or to the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or
go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Effective Date
(i) This amendment becomes effective on November 16, 2005.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 29, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-20075 Filed 10-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P