Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Falcon 2000 Airplanes, 58634-58635 [05-20272]
Download as PDF
58634
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, New York ACO, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
the appropriate principal inspector in the
FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding
District Office.
Related Information
(k) Canadian airworthiness directive CF–
2005–23, dated June 29, 2005, also addresses
the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 30, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–20271 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box
2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey
07606, for service information identified
in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–1137;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Aviation Administration
Comments Invited
14 CFR Part 39
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2005–22633; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–155–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22633; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–155–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Model Falcon 2000 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Dassault Model Falcon 2000
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require an inspection for the presence of
fail-safe pins, nuts, and washers on each
engine, and replacement of the fail-safe
fastener assembly with a new assembly
if necessary. This proposed AD results
from a report of a missing pin of a failsafe fastener. We are proposing this AD
to prevent reduced structural integrity
of an engine mount due to a missing pin
of a fail-safe fastener, and possible
separation of an engine from the
airplane during flight.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Oct 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
´ ´
The Direction Generale de l’Aviation
Civile (DGAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for France,
notified us that an unsafe condition may
exist on certain Dassault Model Falcon
2000 airplanes. The DGAC advises that
the inner pin of a fail-safe fastener,
which ensures the link between the rear
of the engine and the fuselage, has been
found missing on an in-service airplane.
Lack of clarity in a production
procedure is suspected to be the cause
of this event. A missing pin of a fail-safe
fastener, if not corrected, could result in
reduced structural integrity of an engine
mount, and possible separation of an
engine from the airplane during flight.
Relevant Service Information
Dassault has issued Service Bulletin
F2000–301, dated February 2, 2005. The
service bulletin describes procedures for
a detailed inspection for the presence of
fail-safe pins, nuts, and washers on each
engine, and replacement of the fail-safe
fastener assembly with a new assembly
if necessary. Accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the
unsafe condition. The DGAC mandated
the service information and issued
French airworthiness directive F–2005–
018, dated February 2, 2005, to ensure
the continued airworthiness of these
airplanes in France.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This airplane model is manufactured
in France and is type certificated for
operation in the United States under the
provisions of section 21.29 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.29) and the applicable bilateral
airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to
this bilateral airworthiness agreement,
the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. We
have examined the DGAC’s findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and
determined that we need to issue an AD
for airplanes of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United
States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the
actions specified in the service
information described previously,
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Proposed Rules
except as discussed under ‘‘Difference
Between Proposed Rule, French
Airworthiness Directive, and Referenced
Service Bulletin.’’
Difference Between Proposed Rule,
French Airworthiness Directive, and
Referenced Service Bulletin
The French airworthiness directive
requires operators to inform the airplane
manufacturer of inspection results. The
Accomplishment Instructions of the
referenced service bulletin describe
procedures for submitting a comment
sheet related to service bulletin quality,
a sheet recording compliance with the
service bulletin, and reply card noting
the precise location of any missing
component. However, this proposed AD
would not require those actions. We do
not need this information from
operators.
Costs of Compliance
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
This proposed AD would affect about
149 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
proposed inspection would take about 1
work hour per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based
on these figures, the estimated cost of
the inspection proposed by this AD for
U.S. operators is $9,685, or $65 per
airplane.
The Proposed Amendment
Authority for This Rulemaking
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Oct 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA–2005–
22633; Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–
155–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by November 7, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
58635
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection and Replacement
(f) Before the accumulation of 3,750 total
landings, or within 2 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, do a detailed inspection for the
presence of fail-safe pins, nuts, and washers
on each engine, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault
Service Bulletin F2000–301, dated February
2, 2005. If any component is found missing
at an attachment point, before further flight,
replace the fail-safe fastener assembly with a
new assembly, in accordance with the service
bulletin.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
(g) Inspections and replacements done in
accordance with Chapter 54–003 of the
Dassault Falcon 2000 Maintenance Manual
are acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
No Reporting
(h) Although the service bulletin
referenced in this AD specifies to submit
certain information to the manufacturer, this
AD does not include that requirement.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model
Falcon 2000 airplanes, certificated in any
category; up to and including serial number
212, excluding serial number 208.
Related Information
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of a
missing pin of a double fail-safe fastener. We
are issuing this AD to prevent reduced
structural integrity of an engine mount due
to a missing pin of a fail-safe fastener, and
possible separation of an engine from the
airplane during flight.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 29, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–20272 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am]
(j) French airworthiness directive F–2005–
018, dated February 2, 2005, also addresses
the subject of this AD.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58634-58635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20272]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-22633; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-155-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Falcon 2000 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Dassault Model Falcon 2000 airplanes. This proposed AD
would require an inspection for the presence of fail-safe pins, nuts,
and washers on each engine, and replacement of the fail-safe fastener
assembly with a new assembly if necessary. This proposed AD results
from a report of a missing pin of a fail-safe fastener. We are
proposing this AD to prevent reduced structural integrity of an engine
mount due to a missing pin of a fail-safe fastener, and possible
separation of an engine from the airplane during flight.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 7,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, New
Jersey 07606, for service information identified in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2005-
22633; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-155-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System
receives them.
Discussion
The Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC),
which is the airworthiness authority for France, notified us that an
unsafe condition may exist on certain Dassault Model Falcon 2000
airplanes. The DGAC advises that the inner pin of a fail-safe fastener,
which ensures the link between the rear of the engine and the fuselage,
has been found missing on an in-service airplane. Lack of clarity in a
production procedure is suspected to be the cause of this event. A
missing pin of a fail-safe fastener, if not corrected, could result in
reduced structural integrity of an engine mount, and possible
separation of an engine from the airplane during flight.
Relevant Service Information
Dassault has issued Service Bulletin F2000-301, dated February 2,
2005. The service bulletin describes procedures for a detailed
inspection for the presence of fail-safe pins, nuts, and washers on
each engine, and replacement of the fail-safe fastener assembly with a
new assembly if necessary. Accomplishing the actions specified in the
service information is intended to adequately address the unsafe
condition. The DGAC mandated the service information and issued French
airworthiness directive F-2005-018, dated February 2, 2005, to ensure
the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in France.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This airplane model is manufactured in France and is type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. We have examined the DGAC's findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that we need to
issue an AD for airplanes of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in the service information
described previously,
[[Page 58635]]
except as discussed under ``Difference Between Proposed Rule, French
Airworthiness Directive, and Referenced Service Bulletin.''
Difference Between Proposed Rule, French Airworthiness Directive, and
Referenced Service Bulletin
The French airworthiness directive requires operators to inform the
airplane manufacturer of inspection results. The Accomplishment
Instructions of the referenced service bulletin describe procedures for
submitting a comment sheet related to service bulletin quality, a sheet
recording compliance with the service bulletin, and reply card noting
the precise location of any missing component. However, this proposed
AD would not require those actions. We do not need this information
from operators.
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD would affect about 149 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The proposed inspection would take about 1 work hour per airplane, at
an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the inspection proposed by this AD for U.S. operators
is $9,685, or $65 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA-2005-22633; Directorate Identifier
2005-NM-155-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by November
7, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model Falcon 2000 airplanes,
certificated in any category; up to and including serial number 212,
excluding serial number 208.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of a missing pin of a double
fail-safe fastener. We are issuing this AD to prevent reduced
structural integrity of an engine mount due to a missing pin of a
fail-safe fastener, and possible separation of an engine from the
airplane during flight.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection and Replacement
(f) Before the accumulation of 3,750 total landings, or within 2
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
do a detailed inspection for the presence of fail-safe pins, nuts,
and washers on each engine, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Dassault Service Bulletin F2000-301, dated February
2, 2005. If any component is found missing at an attachment point,
before further flight, replace the fail-safe fastener assembly with
a new assembly, in accordance with the service bulletin.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
(g) Inspections and replacements done in accordance with Chapter
54-003 of the Dassault Falcon 2000 Maintenance Manual are acceptable
for compliance with the requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
No Reporting
(h) Although the service bulletin referenced in this AD
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Related Information
(j) French airworthiness directive F-2005-018, dated February 2,
2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 29, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-20272 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P