Special Conditions: Raytheon Model HS.125 Airplanes; High-Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF), 58605-58607 [05-20175]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, October 4, 2005.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05–20299 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM330; Special Conditions No.
25–301–SC]
Special Conditions: Raytheon Model
HS.125 Airplanes; High-Intensity
Radiated Fields (HIRF)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for a Raytheon Model HS.125
airplane modified by LJSC Ltd. This
modified airplane will have a novel or
unusual design feature when compared
to the state of technology envisioned in
the airworthiness standards for
transport category airplanes. The
modification incorporates the
installation of two Air Data Display
Units and two Air Data Sensors
manufactured by Innovative Solutions
and Support. These systems perform
critical functions. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the protection of these systems from
the effects of high-intensity radiated
fields (HIRF). These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is September 29,
2005.
Comments must be received on or
before November 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments on these special
conditions may be mailed in duplicate
to: Federal Aviation Administration,
Transport Airplane Directorate,
Attention: Rules Docket (ANM–113),
Docket No. NM330, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98055–4056;
or delivered in duplicate to the
Transport Airplane Directorate at the
above address. All comments must be
marked: Docket No. NM330.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg
Dunn, FAA, Airplane and Flight Crew
Interface Branch, ANM–111, Transport
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:00 Oct 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98055–4056;
telephone (425) 227–2799; facsimile
(425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA has determined that notice
and opportunity for prior public
comment is impracticable because these
procedures would significantly delay
certification of the airplane and thus
delivery of the affected aircraft. In
addition, the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA therefore finds that
good cause exists for making these
special conditions effective upon
issuance; however, the FAA invites
interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the special conditions,
explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning these special conditions.
The docket is available for public
inspection before and after the comment
closing date. If you wish to review the
docket in person, go to the address in
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these special conditions
based on the comments we receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge
receipt of your comments on these
special conditions, include with your
comments a pre-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the docket number
appears. We will stamp the date on the
postcard and mail it back to you.
Background
On July 11, 2005, LJSC Ltd., 8847
West Monroe Circle, Suite 300, Wichita,
Kansas 67209 applied for a
supplemental type certificate (STC) to
modify a Raytheon Model HS.125 Series
600A airplane, S/N 256066. This model
is currently approved under Type
Certificate No. A3EU. The Raytheon
Model HS.125 airplane is a small
transport category airplane powered by
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58605
two turbine engines. It operates with a
2-pilot crew and can seat up to 15
passengers. The modification
incorporates the installation of two Air
Data Display Units (ADDUs) and two
Air Data Sensors (ADSs) manufactured
by Innovative Solutions and Support
(IS&S). The avionics/electronics and
electrical systems installed in this
airplane have the potential to be
vulnerable to high-intensity radiated
fields (HIRF) external to the airplane.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR
21.101, LJSC Ltd. must show that
Raytheon Model HS.125 Series 600A
airplane S/N 256066, as changed,
continues to meet the applicable
provisions of the regulations
incorporated by reference in Type
Certificate No. A3EU, or the applicable
regulations in effect on the date of
application for the change. The
regulations incorporated by reference in
the type certificate are commonly
referred to as the ‘‘original type
certification basis.’’ The certification
basis for the Raytheon Model HS.125
airplane includes CAR 10, British Civil
Airworthiness Requirements and
Special Conditions. This certification is
equivalent to CAR.4b dated December
1953, Amendment 4b–1 through
Amendment 4b–11, exclusive of CAR
4b.350(e) and includes Special
Regulations SR.422B. Type Certificate
No. A3EU was amended to include
HS.125 Series 600A on January 6, 1976.
Compliance over and above certification
basis requirements has been met with
CAR Amendment 4B–12 and
Amendment 4B–14. Compliance has
been established with the special
retroactive requirements of 14 CFR 25.2
through Amendment 25–20, 14 CFR 21
Amendment 21–27, and 14 CFR 36
(1)(c)(2).
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., part 25, as amended) do not
contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for the Raytheon Model
HS.125 Series 600A airplane, S/N
256066, because of a novel or unusual
design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, Raytheon Model HS.125
Series 600A airplane, S/N 256066, must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
Special conditions, as defined in 14
CFR 11.19, are issued in accordance
with § 11.38 and become part of the type
E:\FR\FM\07OCR1.SGM
07OCR1
58606
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
certification basis in accordance with
§ 21.101.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should LJSC Ltd. apply at a
later date for a STC to modify any other
model included on Type Certificate No.
A3EU to incorporate the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, these
special conditions would also apply to
the other model under the provisions of
§ 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
As noted earlier, Raytheon Model
HS.125 airplane, S/N 256066, modified
by LJSC Ltd., will incorporate two
ADDUs and two ADSs manufactured by
IS&S that will perform critical
functions. These systems may be
vulnerable to high-intensity radiated
fields (HIRF) external to the airplane.
The current airworthiness standards of
part 25 do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the
protection of this equipment from the
adverse effects of HIRF. Accordingly,
this system is considered to be a novel
or unusual design feature.
Discussion
There is no specific regulation that
addresses protection requirements for
electrical and electronic systems from
HIRF. Increased power levels from
ground-based radio transmitters and the
growing use of sensitive avionics/
electronics and electrical systems to
command and control airplanes have
made it necessary to provide adequate
protection.
To ensure that a level of safety is
achieved equivalent to that intended by
the regulations incorporated by
reference, special conditions are needed
for Raytheon Model HS.125 Series 600A
airplane, S/N 256066, modified by LJSC
Ltd. These special conditions require
that new avionics/electronics and
electrical systems that perform critical
functions be designed and installed to
preclude component damage and
interruption of function due to both the
direct and indirect effects of HIRF.
High-Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
With the trend toward increased
power levels from ground-based
transmitters, and the advent of space
and satellite communications coupled
with electronic command and control of
the airplane, the immunity of critical
avionics/electronics and electrical
systems to HIRF must be established.
It is not possible to precisely define
the HIRF to which the airplane will be
exposed in service. There is also
uncertainty concerning the effectiveness
of airframe shielding for HIRF.
Furthermore, coupling of
electromagnetic energy to cockpitinstalled equipment through the cockpit
window apertures is undefined. Based
on surveys and analysis of existing HIRF
emitters, an adequate level of protection
exists when compliance with the HIRF
protection special condition is shown
with either paragraph 1 OR 2 below:
1. A minimum threat of 100 volts rms
(root-mean-square) per meter electric
field strength from 10 KHz to 18 GHz.
a. The threat must be applied to the
system elements and their associated
wiring harnesses without the benefit of
airframe shielding.
b. Demonstration of this level of
protection is established through system
tests and analysis.
2. A threat external to the airframe of
the field strengths identified in the table
below for the frequency ranges
indicated. Both peak and average field
strength components from the table are
to be demonstrated.
Field strength
(volts per meter)
Frequency
Peak
10 kHz–100 kHz ......................................................................................................................................................
100 kHz–500 kHz ....................................................................................................................................................
500 kHz–2 MHz .......................................................................................................................................................
2 MHz–30 MHz ........................................................................................................................................................
30 MHz–70 MHz ......................................................................................................................................................
70 MHz–100 MHz ....................................................................................................................................................
100 MHz–200 MHz ..................................................................................................................................................
200 MHz–400 MHz ..................................................................................................................................................
400 MHz–700 MHz ..................................................................................................................................................
700 MHz–1 GHz ......................................................................................................................................................
1 GHz–2 GHz ..........................................................................................................................................................
2 GHz–4 GHz ..........................................................................................................................................................
4 GHz–6 GHz ..........................................................................................................................................................
6 GHz–8 GHz ..........................................................................................................................................................
8 GHz–12 GHz ........................................................................................................................................................
12 GHz–18 GHz ......................................................................................................................................................
18 GHz–40 GHz ......................................................................................................................................................
Average
50
50
50
100
50
50
100
100
700
700
2000
3000
3000
1000
3000
2000
600
50
50
50
100
50
50
100
100
50
100
200
200
200
200
300
200
200
The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak of the root-mean-square (rms) over the complete modulation period.
The threat levels identified above are
the result of an FAA review of existing
studies on the subject of HIRF, in light
of the ongoing work of the
Electromagnetic Effects Harmonization
Working Group of the Aviation
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to a Raytheon
Model HS.125 Series 600A airplane, S/
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:00 Oct 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
N 256066, modified by LJSC Ltd.
Should LJSC Ltd. apply at a later date
for a STC to modify any other model
included on Type Certificate No. A3EU
to incorporate the same or similar novel
or unusual design feature, these special
conditions would apply to that model as
well under the provisions of § 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on a
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Raytheon Model HS.125 Series 600A
airplane, S/N 256066, modified by LJSC
Ltd. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the
airplane.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment procedure in
several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change
E:\FR\FM\07OCR1.SGM
07OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
from those previously issued. Because a
delay would significantly affect the
certification of the airplane, which is
imminent, the FAA has determined that
prior public notice and comment are
unnecessary and impracticable, and
good cause exists for adopting these
special conditions upon issuance. The
FAA is requesting comments to allow
interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in
response to the prior opportunities for
comment described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the
supplemental type certification basis for
the Raytheon Model HS.125 Series 600A
airplane, S/N 256066, modified by LJSC
Ltd.
1. Protection from Unwanted Effects
of HIRF. Each electrical and electronic
system that performs critical functions
must be designed and installed to
ensure that the operation and
operational capability of these systems
to perform critical functions are not
adversely affected when the airplane is
exposed to high-intensity radiated
fields.
2. For the purpose of these special
conditions, the following definition
applies: Critical Functions: Functions
whose failure would contribute to or
cause a failure condition that would
prevent the continued safe flight and
landing of the airplane.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 29, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–20175 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am]
13:00 Oct 06, 2005
Federal Aviation Administration
13 CFR Part 71
Jkt 208001
Issued in Kansas City, MO, on September
16, 2005.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services
Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–20179 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am]
[Docket No. FAA–2005–21703; Airspace
Docket No. 05–ACE–19]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
Modification of Class D and Class E
Airspace; Topeka, Forbes Field, KS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for
comments; correction.
Federal Aviation Administration
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action corrects an error
in the legal description of Class D
airspace in a direct final rule, request for
comments that was published in the
Federal Register on Tuesday, July 12,
2005 (70 FR 39914).
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
on 0901 UTC, October 27, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division,
Airspace Branch, ACE–520A, DOT
Regional Headquarters Building, Federal
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone:
(816) 329–2524.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
Federal Register Document 2005–
21703 published on Tuesday, July 12,
2005 (70 FR 39914), modified Class D
and Class E Airspace at Topeka, Forbes
Field, KS. The phrase ‘‘This Class D
airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in
advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Airport/
Facility Directory.’’ was incorrectly
deleted from the legal description of
Class D airspace. This action corrects
that error.
I Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me, the error in the legal
description of Class D Airspace, Topeka,
Forbes Field, KS as published in the
Federal Register Tuesday July 12, 2005
(70 FR 39914), (FR Doc. 2005–21703), is
corrected as follows:
§ 71.1
[Corrected]
On page 39915, Column 2, at the end
of the legal description of ACE KS D
Topeka, Forbes Field, KS, add the
phrase ‘‘This Class D airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and
times established in advance by the
Notice to Airmen. The effective date and
time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility
Directory.’’
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
58607
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22600; Airspace
Docket No. 05–AWP–11]
RIN 2120–AA66
Change of Controlling Agency for
Restricted Areas; HI
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action changes the
controlling agency of Restricted Areas
R–3101 PMRFAC Four, R–3103
Humuula, R–3107 Kaula Rock, R–
3109A, B & C Schofield-Makua, Oahu,
and R–3110A, B & C Schofield-Makua,
Oahu, HI. The FAA is taking this action
to reflect an administrative change of
controlling agencies for the restricted
areas. There are no changes to the
boundaries; designated altitudes; time of
designation; or activities conducted
within the affected restricted areas.
EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, December
22, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken
McElroy, Airspace and Rules, Office of
System Operations Airspace and AIM,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)
267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 73 by
changing the name of the controlling
agency for R–3101 PMRFAC Four, R–
3103 Humuula, R–3107 Kaula Rock, R–
3109A, B & C Schofield-Makua, Oahu,
R–3110A, B & C Schofield-Makua,
Oahu, HI, from ‘‘FAA, Honolulu CERAP
or FAA, Honolulu ATCT’’ to ‘‘FAA,
Honolulu Control Facility.’’ The FAA is
taking this action to reflect an
administrative change of controlling
agencies for the restricted areas. There
are no changes to the boundaries;
designated altitudes; time of
designation; or activities conducted
within the affected restricted areas.
Therefore, notice and public procedures
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary.
E:\FR\FM\07OCR1.SGM
07OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58605-58607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20175]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM330; Special Conditions No. 25-301-SC]
Special Conditions: Raytheon Model HS.125 Airplanes; High-
Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for a Raytheon Model
HS.125 airplane modified by LJSC Ltd. This modified airplane will have
a novel or unusual design feature when compared to the state of
technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport
category airplanes. The modification incorporates the installation of
two Air Data Display Units and two Air Data Sensors manufactured by
Innovative Solutions and Support. These systems perform critical
functions. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards for the protection of these
systems from the effects of high-intensity radiated fields (HIRF).
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that
the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is September 29,
2005.
Comments must be received on or before November 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments on these special conditions may be mailed in
duplicate to: Federal Aviation Administration, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Attention: Rules Docket (ANM-113), Docket No. NM330, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; or delivered in
duplicate to the Transport Airplane Directorate at the above address.
All comments must be marked: Docket No. NM330.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Dunn, FAA, Airplane and Flight
Crew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2799; facsimile (425) 227-
1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA has determined that notice and opportunity for prior public
comment is impracticable because these procedures would significantly
delay certification of the airplane and thus delivery of the affected
aircraft. In addition, the substance of these special conditions has
been subject to the public comment process in several prior instances
with no substantive comments received. The FAA therefore finds that
good cause exists for making these special conditions effective upon
issuance; however, the FAA invites interested persons to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send us two copies of written
comments.
We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning these special conditions. The docket is available for public
inspection before and after the comment closing date. If you wish to
review the docket in person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section
of this preamble between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change
these special conditions based on the comments we receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge receipt of your comments on
these special conditions, include with your comments a pre-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the docket number appears. We will stamp the
date on the postcard and mail it back to you.
Background
On July 11, 2005, LJSC Ltd., 8847 West Monroe Circle, Suite 300,
Wichita, Kansas 67209 applied for a supplemental type certificate (STC)
to modify a Raytheon Model HS.125 Series 600A airplane, S/N 256066.
This model is currently approved under Type Certificate No. A3EU. The
Raytheon Model HS.125 airplane is a small transport category airplane
powered by two turbine engines. It operates with a 2-pilot crew and can
seat up to 15 passengers. The modification incorporates the
installation of two Air Data Display Units (ADDUs) and two Air Data
Sensors (ADSs) manufactured by Innovative Solutions and Support (IS&S).
The avionics/electronics and electrical systems installed in this
airplane have the potential to be vulnerable to high-intensity radiated
fields (HIRF) external to the airplane.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, LJSC Ltd. must show that
Raytheon Model HS.125 Series 600A airplane S/N 256066, as changed,
continues to meet the applicable provisions of the regulations
incorporated by reference in Type Certificate No. A3EU, or the
applicable regulations in effect on the date of application for the
change. The regulations incorporated by reference in the type
certificate are commonly referred to as the ``original type
certification basis.'' The certification basis for the Raytheon Model
HS.125 airplane includes CAR 10, British Civil Airworthiness
Requirements and Special Conditions. This certification is equivalent
to CAR.4b dated December 1953, Amendment 4b-1 through Amendment 4b-11,
exclusive of CAR 4b.350(e) and includes Special Regulations SR.422B.
Type Certificate No. A3EU was amended to include HS.125 Series 600A on
January 6, 1976. Compliance over and above certification basis
requirements has been met with CAR Amendment 4B-12 and Amendment 4B-14.
Compliance has been established with the special retroactive
requirements of 14 CFR 25.2 through Amendment 25-20, 14 CFR 21
Amendment 21-27, and 14 CFR 36 (1)(c)(2).
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., part 25, as amended) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Raytheon Model HS.125 Series 600A
airplane, S/N 256066, because of a novel or unusual design feature,
special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, Raytheon Model HS.125 Series 600A airplane, S/N 256066,
must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14
CFR part 34 and the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
Special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, are issued in
accordance with Sec. 11.38 and become part of the type
[[Page 58606]]
certification basis in accordance with Sec. 21.101.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should LJSC Ltd. apply at a later date for a STC to
modify any other model included on Type Certificate No. A3EU to
incorporate the same or similar novel or unusual design feature, these
special conditions would also apply to the other model under the
provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
As noted earlier, Raytheon Model HS.125 airplane, S/N 256066,
modified by LJSC Ltd., will incorporate two ADDUs and two ADSs
manufactured by IS&S that will perform critical functions. These
systems may be vulnerable to high-intensity radiated fields (HIRF)
external to the airplane. The current airworthiness standards of part
25 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for the
protection of this equipment from the adverse effects of HIRF.
Accordingly, this system is considered to be a novel or unusual design
feature.
Discussion
There is no specific regulation that addresses protection
requirements for electrical and electronic systems from HIRF. Increased
power levels from ground-based radio transmitters and the growing use
of sensitive avionics/electronics and electrical systems to command and
control airplanes have made it necessary to provide adequate
protection.
To ensure that a level of safety is achieved equivalent to that
intended by the regulations incorporated by reference, special
conditions are needed for Raytheon Model HS.125 Series 600A airplane,
S/N 256066, modified by LJSC Ltd. These special conditions require that
new avionics/electronics and electrical systems that perform critical
functions be designed and installed to preclude component damage and
interruption of function due to both the direct and indirect effects of
HIRF.
High-Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
With the trend toward increased power levels from ground-based
transmitters, and the advent of space and satellite communications
coupled with electronic command and control of the airplane, the
immunity of critical avionics/electronics and electrical systems to
HIRF must be established.
It is not possible to precisely define the HIRF to which the
airplane will be exposed in service. There is also uncertainty
concerning the effectiveness of airframe shielding for HIRF.
Furthermore, coupling of electromagnetic energy to cockpit-installed
equipment through the cockpit window apertures is undefined. Based on
surveys and analysis of existing HIRF emitters, an adequate level of
protection exists when compliance with the HIRF protection special
condition is shown with either paragraph 1 OR 2 below:
1. A minimum threat of 100 volts rms (root-mean-square) per meter
electric field strength from 10 KHz to 18 GHz.
a. The threat must be applied to the system elements and their
associated wiring harnesses without the benefit of airframe shielding.
b. Demonstration of this level of protection is established through
system tests and analysis.
2. A threat external to the airframe of the field strengths
identified in the table below for the frequency ranges indicated. Both
peak and average field strength components from the table are to be
demonstrated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field strength (volts per
meter)
Frequency -------------------------------
Peak Average
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 kHz-100 kHz.......................... 50 50
100 kHz-500 kHz......................... 50 50
500 kHz-2 MHz........................... 50 50
2 MHz-30 MHz............................ 100 100
30 MHz-70 MHz........................... 50 50
70 MHz-100 MHz.......................... 50 50
100 MHz-200 MHz......................... 100 100
200 MHz-400 MHz......................... 100 100
400 MHz-700 MHz......................... 700 50
700 MHz-1 GHz........................... 700 100
1 GHz-2 GHz............................. 2000 200
2 GHz-4 GHz............................. 3000 200
4 GHz-6 GHz............................. 3000 200
6 GHz-8 GHz............................. 1000 200
8 GHz-12 GHz............................ 3000 300
12 GHz-18 GHz........................... 2000 200
18 GHz-40 GHz........................... 600 200
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak of the root-mean-
square (rms) over the complete modulation period.
The threat levels identified above are the result of an FAA review
of existing studies on the subject of HIRF, in light of the ongoing
work of the Electromagnetic Effects Harmonization Working Group of the
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to a
Raytheon Model HS.125 Series 600A airplane, S/N 256066, modified by
LJSC Ltd. Should LJSC Ltd. apply at a later date for a STC to modify
any other model included on Type Certificate No. A3EU to incorporate
the same or similar novel or unusual design feature, these special
conditions would apply to that model as well under the provisions of
Sec. 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on a Raytheon Model HS.125 Series 600A airplane, S/N 256066, modified
by LJSC Ltd. It is not a rule of general applicability and affects only
the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these features on
the airplane.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment procedure in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change
[[Page 58607]]
from those previously issued. Because a delay would significantly
affect the certification of the airplane, which is imminent, the FAA
has determined that prior public notice and comment are unnecessary and
impracticable, and good cause exists for adopting these special
conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting comments to allow
interested persons to submit views that may not have been submitted in
response to the prior opportunities for comment described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the supplemental type certification basis for the Raytheon Model HS.125
Series 600A airplane, S/N 256066, modified by LJSC Ltd.
1. Protection from Unwanted Effects of HIRF. Each electrical and
electronic system that performs critical functions must be designed and
installed to ensure that the operation and operational capability of
these systems to perform critical functions are not adversely affected
when the airplane is exposed to high-intensity radiated fields.
2. For the purpose of these special conditions, the following
definition applies: Critical Functions: Functions whose failure would
contribute to or cause a failure condition that would prevent the
continued safe flight and landing of the airplane.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 29, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-20175 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P