Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation, Shasta and Tehama Counties, CA, 58744-58746 [05-20169]
Download as PDF
58744
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Notices
individual of Native American ancestry.
Officials of Pacific Lutheran University
also have determined that, pursuant to
25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a
relationship of shared group identity
that can be reasonably traced between
the Native American human remains
and the Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup
Reservation, Washington.
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains
should contact David R. Huelsbeck,
Anthropology Department, Pacific
Lutheran University, Tacoma, WA
98447, telephone (253) 535–7196, before
November 7, 2005. Repatriation of the
human remains to the Puyallup Tribe of
the Puyallup Reservation, Washington
may proceed after that date if no
additional claimants come forward.
Pacific Lutheran University is
responsible for notifying the the
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the
Yakama Nation, Washington;
Confederated Tribes of the Colville
Reservation, Washington; Cowlitz
Indian Tribe, Washington; Muckleshoot
Indian Tribe of the Muckleshoot
Reservation, Washington; Nisqually
Indian Tribe of the Nisqually
Reservation, Washington; and Puyallup
Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation,
Washington that this notice has been
published.
Dated: September 1, 2005.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 05–20199 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
[FES 05–29]
Humboldt Project Conveyance,
Pershing, Churchill and Lander
Counties, NV
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act 102(2) of
1969, the Bureau of Reclamation has
prepared a FEIS for the Humboldt
Project Conveyance, Pershing,
Churchill, and Lander Counties,
Nevada. The FEIS assesses the impacts
of conveying title of the Humboldt
Project (Project) and associated lands to
the Pershing County Water Conservation
District (PCWCD), State of Nevada,
Lander County and Pershing County.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Oct 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
The action is needed to comply with
Title VIII of Pub. L. 107–282 which
directs Reclamation to transfer title of
the Project to the entities listed above.
DATES: Reclamation will not make a
decision on the proposed action until at
least 30 days after release of the FEIS.
At the end of the 30-day period,
Reclamation will complete a Record of
Decision (ROD). The ROD will state the
action that will be implemented and
will discuss all factors leading to the
decision.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request a copy of the document, please
call (775) 884–8352, or write or e-mail
Caryn Huntt DeCarlo, Bureau of
Reclamation, Lahontan Basin Area
Office, 705 N Plaza, Room 320, Carson
City, NV 89701, or e-mail
chunttdecarlo@mp.usbr.gov. The FEIS is
accessible from the following Web site:
https://www.usbr.gov/mp/nepa/
nepa_projdetails.cfm?Project_ID=550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Notice
of Intent to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement was published in the
Federal Register on February 26, 2003.
A Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
was published in the Federal Register
on January 28, 2005 (70 FR 4149). The
written comment period on the DEIS
ended on March 28, 2005. The FEIS
contains responses to all comments
received and reflects comments and any
additional information received during
the review period.
The Project is located along the
Humboldt River in northwestern
Nevada. Reclamation began Project
construction in 1935 and in 1941 the
first water was delivered to agricultural
lands in the Lovelock Valley from
storage in Rye Patch Reservoir. PCWCD
assumed operation of the Project in
1941. PCWCD has had several Project
repayment contracts with Reclamation
that have all been repaid. Project
features include Battle Mountain
Community Pasture, Rye Patch Dam and
Reservoir, and the Humboldt Sink.
Battle Mountain Community Pasture,
located near Battle Mountain, is
approximately 30,000 acres and is
managed for grazing by the PCWCD
under a lease agreement with
Reclamation. Rye Patch Reservoir is
located 26 miles upstream from
Lovelock, is 21 miles in length, and has
a capacity of 190,000 acre-feet. The
State of Nevada manages the recreation
at the reservoir under a management
agreement with Reclamation and the
PCWCD. The Humboldt Sink is also part
of the Project and is managed by the
State of Nevada under a management
agreement with Reclamation.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Public Comment Availability
Our practice is to make comments,
including names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public
review. Individual respondents may
request that we withhold their home
address from public disclosure, which
we will honor to the extent allowable by
law. There may also be circumstances in
which we would withhold a
respondent’s identity from public
disclosure, as allowable by law. If you
wish us to withhold your name and/or
address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. We will make all submissions
from organizations or businesses, and
from individuals identifying themselves
as representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public disclosure in their entirety.
Dated: August 30, 2005.
Kirk C. Rodgers,
Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 05–20187 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Shasta Lake Water Resources
Investigation, Shasta and Tehama
Counties, CA
AGENCY:
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and notice of public scoping meetings.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Bureau of Reclamation proposes to
prepare an EIS for the Shasta Lake
Water Resources Investigation (SLWRI).
Authorization for the investigation
comes from Pub. L. 96–375, 1980; which
directs the Secretary of the Interior to
engage in feasibility studies related to
enlarging Shasta Dam and Reservoir.
Other directing legislation includes
Title 34 of Pub. L. 102–575, the Central
Valley Project Improvement Act and
Pub. L. 108–137, the Energy and Water
Development Act. In addition,
enlargement of Shasta Dam was
identified in the CALFED Programmatic
Environmental Impact Report/Statement
and Record of Decision (ROD) and in
Pub. L. 108–361, the CALFED Bay-Delta
authority.
A series of public scoping
meetings will be held to solicit public
input on the scope of the environmental
document, alternatives, concerns, and
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Notices
issues to be addressed in the EIS. The
meeting dates are as follows:
• October 24, 2005, 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.,
Sacramento, CA.
• October 24, 2005, 6 to 9 p.m.,
Concord, CA.
• October 26, 2005, 1 to 4 p.m., Los
Angeles, CA.
• November 1, 2005, 6 to 9 p.m.,
Fresno, CA.
• November 2, 2005, 6 to 9 p.m.,
Dunsmuir, CA.
• November 3, 2005, 6 to 9 p.m., Red
Bluff, CA.
Submit written comments on or
before December 6, 2005 to the address
provided below.
ADDRESSES: The public scoping meeting
locations are:
• Federal Building, 2800 Cottage
Way, Rooms C–1001 and C–1002,
Sacramento, CA.
• Heald Conference Center, 5130
Commercial Circle, Concord, CA.
• Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California, 700 North Alameda
Street Room 1–102, Los Angeles, CA.
• Piccadilly Inn, 2305 West Shaw
Avenue, in Fresno, CA.
• Dunsmuir Community Building,
4835 Dunsmuir Avenue in Dunsmuir,
CA.
• Red Bluff Community Center,
Auditorium, 1500 South Jackson.
Written comments on the scope of the
environmental document should be sent
to: Ms. Sammie Cervantes, Bureau of
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, MP–
700, Sacramento CA 95825.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Donna Garcia, Reclamation Project
Manager, at the above address, at 916–
978–5009, TDD 916–978–5608, or via
fax at 916–978–5094 or e-mail at
dgarcia@mp.usbr.gov. If special
assistance is required, please contact
Ms. Cervantes at 916–978–5189, TDD
916–978–5608, or via e-mail at
scervantes@mp.usbr.gov no less than 5
working days prior to the meetings.
Further information on the
investigation, including interim results,
can be found on the SLWRI Web site at
https://www.usbr.gov/mp/slwri or
through the above contact persons.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Constructed from 1938 to 1945, Shasta
Dam serves multiple purposes including
flood control, irrigation and municipal
and industrial water supplies, and
hydropower generation. In addition,
Shasta Lake significantly contributes to
the regional economy through extensive
recreational activities.
Initial feasibility studies in partial
response to Pub. L. 96–375 culminated
in a 1988 Wrap-Up Report which
concluded that enlarging Shasta Dam
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Oct 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
and Reservoir could significantly
increase water supply reliability, if and
when water demands warranted the
required financing. The current
feasibility scope study primarily
involving enlargement of Shasta Dam
and Reservoir was reinitiated in 2000.
Raising Shasta Dam is one of five
surface water storage projects identified
in the August 2000 CALFED ROD which
includes North of Delta Off-Stream
Storage, In-Delta Storage, Los Vaqueros
Enlargement, and Upper San Joaquin
River Basin Storage Investigation. These
surface water storage projects are being
developed further in separate feasibility
studies.
The primary study area for the SLWRI
is Shasta Dam and Reservoir; tributary
rivers and streams, including the upper
reaches of the Sacramento River,
McCloud River, Pit River, and Squaw
Creek; and the Sacramento River
downstream from Shasta Dam to about
the Red Bluff Diversion Dam. Because of
the potential influence of a Shasta Dam
modification on natural resources along
the Sacramento River and on programs
and projects in the Central Valley, the
extended study area includes other
major tributaries to the Sacramento
River, the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta, San Joaquin River basin, and
service areas of the Central Valley
Project (CVP) and State Water Project
(SWP).
Planning studies to date have focused
on identifying water resources problems
and needs in the primary study area,
developing a set of planning objectives
to help guide the remainder of the
feasibility study, and formulating
several initial alternatives. These three
important elements of the study are
summarized below.
Problems and Needs
Major water and related resources
problems and needs identified in the
primary study area include:
• Anadromous Fish Restoration: The
population of Chinook salmon has
declined in the Central Valley. To
address this salmon decline in the
Sacramento River, various actions have
been taken, ranging from establishing
minimum flow requirements in the river
to making structural changes at Shasta
Dam. However, a need still exists for
additional actions to benefit
anadromous fish, especially in dry and
critically dry water years.
• Water Supply Reliability: Demand
for water in California exceeds available
supplies. As the population of the
Central Valley grows, the need to
maintain a healthy and vibrant
industrial and agricultural economy will
increase while the demand for an
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58745
adequate water supply becomes more
acute.
• Other Resource Needs: Other
identified problems and needs include
the need for environmental restoration
in the Shasta Lake area and downstream
along the Sacramento River; the need for
additional flood control along the upper
Sacramento River; and growing
demands for new energy sources in
California and outdoor recreation in the
primary study area.
Planning Objectives
The Problems and Needs in the study
area were translated into Primary and
Secondary Planning Objectives.
• Primary Planning Objectives:
Alternatives will be formulated to
address the primary objectives. The
primary objectives for the SLWRI are:
(1) Increase the restoration of
anadromous fish populations in the
Sacramento River primarily upstream
from the Red Bluff Diversion Dam and
(2) increase water supplies and water
supply reliability for agricultural,
municipal and industrial, and
environmental purposes to help meet
future water demands, with a focus on
enlarging Shasta Dam and Reservoir.
• Secondary Planning Objectives:
Through pursuit of the primary
planning objectives, the following
secondary objectives will be met to the
extent possible: (1) Preserve and restore
ecosystem resources in the Shasta Lake
area and along the upper Sacramento
River, (2) reduce flood damages along
the Sacramento River; (3) develop
additional hydropower capabilities at
Shasta Dam, and (4) preserve outdoor
recreation opportunities at Shasta Lake.
Initial Alternatives
From the Planning Objectives and a
resulting planning constraints and
criteria, a number of water resources
management measures were identified.
The most effective of measures were
used to formulate a set of concept plans
from which five initial alternatives were
developed. Specific measures and
combinations of measures in these
initial alternatives will likely change in
future studies and some may be
combined with others or dropped from
further consideration. In addition, other
measures and combination of measures
may emerge and warrant development
into alternatives during the scoping
process. These five initial alternatives
are summarized below.
• No-Action (No Federal Action):
Under the No-Action Alternative, the
Federal Government would take no
action toward implementing a specific
plan to help increase anadromous fish
survival opportunities in the upper
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
58746
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Notices
Sacramento River nor help address the
growing water reliability issues in the
Central Valley of California through the
assistance of Shasta Dam and Reservoir.
• Increase Water Supply Reliability
with Shasta Enlargement: The primary
purpose of this initial alternative is to be
consistent with the goals of the CALFED
ROD, which focus on increasing CVP
and SWP water supply reliability while
contributing to increased anadromous
fish survival. It includes raising Shasta
Dam between 6.5 to 18.5 feet, which
would increase storage space in Shasta
Reservoir by 290,000 acre-feet and
640,000 acre-feet, respectively. The
increased pool depth and volume also
could contribute to incidental benefits
for flood control, hydropower, and
outdoor recreation.
• Increase Water Supply Reliability
with Shasta Enlargement and
Conjunctive Water Management: The
primary purpose of this initial
alternative is to increase CVP and SWP
water supply reliability through a
combination of enlargement of Shasta
Dam and Reservoir and conjunctive
water management, consistent with the
goals of the CALFED ROD. This plan is
similar to the above initial alternative
and includes raising Shasta Dam up to
about 18.5 feet. It also includes
implementing a conjunctive water
management component consisting
primarily of contract agreements
between Reclamation and Sacramento
River basin water users.
• Increase Anadromous Fish Habitat
and Water Supply Reliability with
Shasta Enlargement: The primary
purpose of this initial alternative is to
address both primary objectives with a
focus on increasing anadromous fish
habitat and enlarging Shasta Reservoir
up to about 18.5 feet. In addition to
increasing the cold water pool in Shasta
Lake, this alternative includes restoring
inactive gravel mines along the
Sacramento River to help benefit
anadromous fish.
• Multipurpose with Shasta
Enlargement: This initial alternative
also consists of raising Shasta Dam up
to about 18.5 feet. In addition, to
address the primary objectives, it
includes conjunctive water management
and restoring inactive gravel mines and
floodplain habitat along the upper
Sacramento River. Features that address
the secondary objectives include
constructing warm water fish habitat in
the Shasta Lake area, restoring one or
more riparian habitat areas between
Redding and Red Bluff on the
Sacramento River, and possibly reoperating Shasta Dam for increased
flood control.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Oct 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
These and other possible alternatives
will be considered and developed
through comments received during the
scoping process. During scoping,
Reclamation will be seeking input about
possible methods for evaluating water
management that will meet the
identified water resources problems and
needs consistent with the planning
objectives.
Written comments, including names
and home addresses of respondents,
will be made available for public
review. Individual respondents may
request that their home address be
withheld from public disclosure, which
will be honored to the extent allowable
by law. There may be circumstances in
which respondents’ identity may also be
withheld from public disclosure, as
allowable by law. If you wish to have
your name and/or address withheld,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comment. All
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public disclosure in
their entirety.
Dated: August 26, 2005.
Michael Nepstad,
Deputy Regional Environmental Officer, MidPacific Region.
[FR Doc. 05–20169 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. TA–421–6]
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
From China
Determination
On the basis of information developed
in the subject investigation, the United
States International Trade Commission
determines, pursuant to section
421(b)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974,1 that
circular welded non-alloy steel pipe 2
1 19
U.S.C. 2451(b)(1).
products subject to this investigation
include certain welded carbon quality steel pipes
and tubes, of circular cross-section, with an outside
diameter of 0.372 inches (9.45 mm) or more, but not
more than 16 inches (406.4 mm), regardless of wall
thickness, surface finish (black, galvanized, or
painted), end finish (plain end, beveled end,
grooved, threaded, or threaded and coupled), or
industry specification (ASTM, proprietary, or
other), generally known as standard pipe and
structural pipe (they may also be referred to as
structural or mechanical tubing). The term carbon
quality steel may include certain low alloy steel
imported as other alloy steel pipes and tubes.
All pipe meeting the physical description set
forth above that is used in, or intended for use in,
2 The
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
from the People’s Republic of China is
being imported into the United States in
such increased quantities or under such
conditions as to cause or threaten to
cause market disruption to the domestic
producers of like or directly competitive
products.3
Background
Following receipt of a petition, on
August 2, 2005, on behalf of Allied Tube
and Conduit Corp., Harvey, IL; IPSCO
Tubulars, Inc., Camanche, IA; Maruichi
American Corp., Santa Fe Springs, CA;
Maverick Tube Corp., Chesterfield, MO;
Sharon Tube Co., Sharon, PA; Western
Tube Conduit Corp., Long Beach, CA;
Wheatland Tube Co., Wheatland, PA.;
and the United Steelworkers of
America, AFL–CIO, Pittsburgh, PA; the
Commission instituted investigation No.
TA–421–06, Circular Welded Non-Alloy
Steel Pipe from China, under section
421(b) of the Act to determine whether
circular welded non-alloy steel pipe
standard and structural pipe applications is covered
by the scope of this investigation. Standard pipe
applications include the low-pressure conveyance
of water, steam, natural gas, air and other liquids
and gases in plumbing and heating systems, air
conditioning units, automatic sprinkler systems,
and other related uses. Standard pipe may also be
used for light load-bearing and mechanical
applications, such as for fence tubing, and as an
intermediate product for protection of electrical
wiring, such as conduit shells. Structural pipe is
used in construction applications.
Products not included in this investigation are
mechanical tubing (whether or not cold-drawn)
provided for in HTS subheading 7306.30.50, tube
and pipe hollows for redrawing provided for in
HTS 7306.30.5035, or finished electrical conduit
provided for in HTS 7306.30.5028. API line pipe
used in oil or gas applications requiring API
certifications is also not included in this
investigation. Similarly, pipe produced to the API
specifications for oil country tubular goods use are
not included in this investigation.
The subject imported products are currently
provided for in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTS) subheadings 7306.30.10
and 7306.30.50. Specifically, the various HTS
statistical reporting numbers under which the
subject standard pipe has been provided for since
January 1, 1992, are as follows: 7306.30.1000,
7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040,
7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090.
Although the HTS category is provided for
convenience and Customs purposes, the written
description of the merchandise under investigation
is dispositive.
Pipe multiple-stenciled to the ASTM A–53
specification and to any other specification, such as
the API-fL or 5L X–42 specifications, or singlecertified pipe that enters under HTS subheading
7306.10.10, is covered by this investigation when
used in, or intended for use in, one of the standard
pipe applications listed above, regardless of the
HTS category in which it is entered. Pipe shells that
enter the United States under HTS subheading
7306.30.50, including HTS statistical reporting
number 7306.30.5028, are also covered by this
investigation. The investigation also covers pipe
used for the production of scaffolding (but does not
include finished scaffolding).
3 Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun and
Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson make a negative
determination.
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58744-58746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20169]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation, Shasta and Tehama
Counties, CA
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and notice of public scoping meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Bureau of Reclamation proposes to prepare an EIS for the Shasta Lake
Water Resources Investigation (SLWRI). Authorization for the
investigation comes from Pub. L. 96-375, 1980; which directs the
Secretary of the Interior to engage in feasibility studies related to
enlarging Shasta Dam and Reservoir. Other directing legislation
includes Title 34 of Pub. L. 102-575, the Central Valley Project
Improvement Act and Pub. L. 108-137, the Energy and Water Development
Act. In addition, enlargement of Shasta Dam was identified in the
CALFED Programmatic Environmental Impact Report/Statement and Record of
Decision (ROD) and in Pub. L. 108-361, the CALFED Bay-Delta authority.
DATES: A series of public scoping meetings will be held to solicit
public input on the scope of the environmental document, alternatives,
concerns, and
[[Page 58745]]
issues to be addressed in the EIS. The meeting dates are as follows:
October 24, 2005, 10 a.m. to 1 p.m., Sacramento, CA.
October 24, 2005, 6 to 9 p.m., Concord, CA.
October 26, 2005, 1 to 4 p.m., Los Angeles, CA.
November 1, 2005, 6 to 9 p.m., Fresno, CA.
November 2, 2005, 6 to 9 p.m., Dunsmuir, CA.
November 3, 2005, 6 to 9 p.m., Red Bluff, CA.
Submit written comments on or before December 6, 2005 to the
address provided below.
ADDRESSES: The public scoping meeting locations are:
Federal Building, 2800 Cottage Way, Rooms C-1001 and C-
1002, Sacramento, CA.
Heald Conference Center, 5130 Commercial Circle, Concord,
CA.
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, 700
North Alameda Street Room 1-102, Los Angeles, CA.
Piccadilly Inn, 2305 West Shaw Avenue, in Fresno, CA.
Dunsmuir Community Building, 4835 Dunsmuir Avenue in
Dunsmuir, CA.
Red Bluff Community Center, Auditorium, 1500 South
Jackson.
Written comments on the scope of the environmental document should
be sent to: Ms. Sammie Cervantes, Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage
Way, MP-700, Sacramento CA 95825.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Donna Garcia, Reclamation Project
Manager, at the above address, at 916-978-5009, TDD 916-978-5608, or
via fax at 916-978-5094 or e-mail at dgarcia@mp.usbr.gov. If special
assistance is required, please contact Ms. Cervantes at 916-978-5189,
TDD 916-978-5608, or via e-mail at scervantes@mp.usbr.gov no less than
5 working days prior to the meetings. Further information on the
investigation, including interim results, can be found on the SLWRI Web
site at https://www.usbr.gov/mp/slwri or through the above contact
persons.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Constructed from 1938 to 1945, Shasta Dam
serves multiple purposes including flood control, irrigation and
municipal and industrial water supplies, and hydropower generation. In
addition, Shasta Lake significantly contributes to the regional economy
through extensive recreational activities.
Initial feasibility studies in partial response to Pub. L. 96-375
culminated in a 1988 Wrap-Up Report which concluded that enlarging
Shasta Dam and Reservoir could significantly increase water supply
reliability, if and when water demands warranted the required
financing. The current feasibility scope study primarily involving
enlargement of Shasta Dam and Reservoir was reinitiated in 2000.
Raising Shasta Dam is one of five surface water storage projects
identified in the August 2000 CALFED ROD which includes North of Delta
Off-Stream Storage, In-Delta Storage, Los Vaqueros Enlargement, and
Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation. These surface
water storage projects are being developed further in separate
feasibility studies.
The primary study area for the SLWRI is Shasta Dam and Reservoir;
tributary rivers and streams, including the upper reaches of the
Sacramento River, McCloud River, Pit River, and Squaw Creek; and the
Sacramento River downstream from Shasta Dam to about the Red Bluff
Diversion Dam. Because of the potential influence of a Shasta Dam
modification on natural resources along the Sacramento River and on
programs and projects in the Central Valley, the extended study area
includes other major tributaries to the Sacramento River, the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, San Joaquin River basin, and service
areas of the Central Valley Project (CVP) and State Water Project
(SWP).
Planning studies to date have focused on identifying water
resources problems and needs in the primary study area, developing a
set of planning objectives to help guide the remainder of the
feasibility study, and formulating several initial alternatives. These
three important elements of the study are summarized below.
Problems and Needs
Major water and related resources problems and needs identified in
the primary study area include:
Anadromous Fish Restoration: The population of Chinook
salmon has declined in the Central Valley. To address this salmon
decline in the Sacramento River, various actions have been taken,
ranging from establishing minimum flow requirements in the river to
making structural changes at Shasta Dam. However, a need still exists
for additional actions to benefit anadromous fish, especially in dry
and critically dry water years.
Water Supply Reliability: Demand for water in California
exceeds available supplies. As the population of the Central Valley
grows, the need to maintain a healthy and vibrant industrial and
agricultural economy will increase while the demand for an adequate
water supply becomes more acute.
Other Resource Needs: Other identified problems and needs
include the need for environmental restoration in the Shasta Lake area
and downstream along the Sacramento River; the need for additional
flood control along the upper Sacramento River; and growing demands for
new energy sources in California and outdoor recreation in the primary
study area.
Planning Objectives
The Problems and Needs in the study area were translated into
Primary and Secondary Planning Objectives.
Primary Planning Objectives: Alternatives will be
formulated to address the primary objectives. The primary objectives
for the SLWRI are: (1) Increase the restoration of anadromous fish
populations in the Sacramento River primarily upstream from the Red
Bluff Diversion Dam and (2) increase water supplies and water supply
reliability for agricultural, municipal and industrial, and
environmental purposes to help meet future water demands, with a focus
on enlarging Shasta Dam and Reservoir.
Secondary Planning Objectives: Through pursuit of the
primary planning objectives, the following secondary objectives will be
met to the extent possible: (1) Preserve and restore ecosystem
resources in the Shasta Lake area and along the upper Sacramento River,
(2) reduce flood damages along the Sacramento River; (3) develop
additional hydropower capabilities at Shasta Dam, and (4) preserve
outdoor recreation opportunities at Shasta Lake.
Initial Alternatives
From the Planning Objectives and a resulting planning constraints
and criteria, a number of water resources management measures were
identified. The most effective of measures were used to formulate a set
of concept plans from which five initial alternatives were developed.
Specific measures and combinations of measures in these initial
alternatives will likely change in future studies and some may be
combined with others or dropped from further consideration. In
addition, other measures and combination of measures may emerge and
warrant development into alternatives during the scoping process. These
five initial alternatives are summarized below.
No-Action (No Federal Action): Under the No-Action
Alternative, the Federal Government would take no action toward
implementing a specific plan to help increase anadromous fish survival
opportunities in the upper
[[Page 58746]]
Sacramento River nor help address the growing water reliability issues
in the Central Valley of California through the assistance of Shasta
Dam and Reservoir.
Increase Water Supply Reliability with Shasta Enlargement:
The primary purpose of this initial alternative is to be consistent
with the goals of the CALFED ROD, which focus on increasing CVP and SWP
water supply reliability while contributing to increased anadromous
fish survival. It includes raising Shasta Dam between 6.5 to 18.5 feet,
which would increase storage space in Shasta Reservoir by 290,000 acre-
feet and 640,000 acre-feet, respectively. The increased pool depth and
volume also could contribute to incidental benefits for flood control,
hydropower, and outdoor recreation.
Increase Water Supply Reliability with Shasta Enlargement
and Conjunctive Water Management: The primary purpose of this initial
alternative is to increase CVP and SWP water supply reliability through
a combination of enlargement of Shasta Dam and Reservoir and
conjunctive water management, consistent with the goals of the CALFED
ROD. This plan is similar to the above initial alternative and includes
raising Shasta Dam up to about 18.5 feet. It also includes implementing
a conjunctive water management component consisting primarily of
contract agreements between Reclamation and Sacramento River basin
water users.
Increase Anadromous Fish Habitat and Water Supply
Reliability with Shasta Enlargement: The primary purpose of this
initial alternative is to address both primary objectives with a focus
on increasing anadromous fish habitat and enlarging Shasta Reservoir up
to about 18.5 feet. In addition to increasing the cold water pool in
Shasta Lake, this alternative includes restoring inactive gravel mines
along the Sacramento River to help benefit anadromous fish.
Multipurpose with Shasta Enlargement: This initial
alternative also consists of raising Shasta Dam up to about 18.5 feet.
In addition, to address the primary objectives, it includes conjunctive
water management and restoring inactive gravel mines and floodplain
habitat along the upper Sacramento River. Features that address the
secondary objectives include constructing warm water fish habitat in
the Shasta Lake area, restoring one or more riparian habitat areas
between Redding and Red Bluff on the Sacramento River, and possibly re-
operating Shasta Dam for increased flood control.
These and other possible alternatives will be considered and
developed through comments received during the scoping process. During
scoping, Reclamation will be seeking input about possible methods for
evaluating water management that will meet the identified water
resources problems and needs consistent with the planning objectives.
Written comments, including names and home addresses of
respondents, will be made available for public review. Individual
respondents may request that their home address be withheld from public
disclosure, which will be honored to the extent allowable by law. There
may be circumstances in which respondents' identity may also be
withheld from public disclosure, as allowable by law. If you wish to
have your name and/or address withheld, you must state this prominently
at the beginning of your comment. All submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public disclosure in their entirety.
Dated: August 26, 2005.
Michael Nepstad,
Deputy Regional Environmental Officer, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 05-20169 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P