Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Regulations Under the Federal Import Milk Act, 58709-58711 [05-20148]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Notices
and Human Services, is publishing the
following summary of proposed
collections for public comment.
Interested persons are invited to send
comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including any
of the following subjects: (1) The
necessity and utility of the proposed
information collection for the proper
performance of the agency’s functions;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology to
minimize the information collection
burden.
We are, however, requesting an
emergency review of the information
collection referenced below. In
compliance with the requirement of
section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we have
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) the following
requirements for emergency review. We
are requesting an emergency review
because the collection of this
information is needed before the
expiration of the normal time limits
under OMB’s regulations at 5 CFR part
1320. This is necessary to ensure
compliance with an initiative of the
Administration. We cannot reasonably
comply with the normal clearance
procedures because the normal
procedures are likely to cause a
statutory deadline to be missed which
may result in public harm.
Section 1860D–23 and 1860D–24 of
the Social Security Act, added by the
Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of
2003 (MMA), requires the Secretary to
establish requirements for prescription
drug plans to ensure the effective
coordination between Part D plans,
State pharmaceutical assistance
programs and other payers. These
requirements have been codified into
the Code of Federal Regulations at 42
CFR 423.464.
Part D sponsors will be responsible
for making system changes related to
enrollment file sharing, claims
processing and payment, reconciliation
and tracking of the true out-of-pocket
expenditures of beneficiaries prior to
the implementation of Part D (January 1,
2006). System changes must also be
implemented by State pharmaceutical
assistance programs so that they may
provide additional drug benefits at the
pharmacy to Part D beneficiaries. In
addition to making system changes,
these changes must be tested, which
will require additional time prior to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:29 Oct 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
January 1, 2006. Failure to make system
changes may result in the delay in the
implementation of the program and may
result in a direct harm to beneficiaries
since delays or mistakes in claims
processing may result in beneficiaries
not receiving their medications, or being
unable to pay for medications out-ofpocket until the system issue is
resolved.
CMS is requesting OMB review and
approval of this collection by November
8, 2005, with a 180-day approval period.
Written comments and
recommendations will be accepted from
the public if received by the individuals
designated below by November 7, 2005.
Type of Information Collection
Request: New Collection; Title of
Information Collection: Coordination of
Benefits between Part D Plans and Other
Prescription Coverage Providers; Use:
This information is necessary to assist
with coordination of prescription drug
benefits provided to the Medicare
beneficiary at the pharmacy; Form
Number: CMS–10171 (OMB#: 0938–
NEW); Frequency: On occasion and
monthly; Affected Public: Business or
other for-profit, Federal, State, Local
and Tribal Government; Number of
Respondents: 56,320; Total Annual
Responses: 2,153,767,270; Total Annual
Hours: 1,017,914.
To obtain copies of the supporting
statement and any related forms for the
proposed paperwork collections
referenced above, access CMS’ Web site
address at https://www.cms.hhs.gov/
regulations/pra or e-mail your request,
including your address, phone number,
OMB number, and CMS document
identifier, to paperwork@cms.hhs.gov,
or call the Reports Clearance Office at
(410) 786–1326.
Interested persons are invited to send
comments regarding the burden or any
other aspect of these collections of
information requirements. However, as
noted above, comments on these
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements must be
received by the designees referenced
below by November 7, 2005: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of
Strategic Operations and Regulatory
Affairs, Room C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850,
Attn: Melissa Musotto, CMS–10171.
and, OMB Human Resources and
Housing Branch, Attention: CMS Desk
Officer, New Executive Office Building,
Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58709
Dated: September 30, 2005.
Michelle Shortt,
Director, Regulations Development Group,
Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 05–20229 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005N–0178]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Regulations Under the Federal Import
Milk Act
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by November
7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: OMB is still experiencing
significant delays in the regular mail,
including first class and express mail,
and messenger deliveries are not being
accepted. To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that comments be
faxed to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Fumie
Yokota, Desk Officer for FDA, FAX:
202–395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peggy Robbins, Office of Management
Programs (HFA 250), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–1223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Under the regulations implementing
the Federal Import Milk Act (FIMA) (21
U.S.C. 141–149), milk or cream may be
imported into the United States only by
the holder of a valid import milk permit.
Before such permit is issued: (1) All
cows from which import milk or cream
is produced must be physically
examined and found healthy; (2) if the
milk or cream is imported raw, all such
cows must pass a tuberculin test; (3) the
dairy farm and each plant in which the
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
58710
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Notices
milk or cream is processed or handled
must be inspected and found to meet
certain sanitary requirements; (4)
bacterial counts of the milk at the time
of importation must not exceed
specified limits; and (5) the temperature
of the milk or cream at time of
importation must not exceed 50° F. In
addition, the regulations in part 1210
(21 CFR part 1210) require that dairy
farmers and plants maintain
pasteurization records (§ 1210.15) and
that each container of milk or cream
imported into the United States bear a
tag with the product type, permit
number, and shipper’s name and
address (§ 1210.22).
In the Federal Register of May 31,
2005 (70 FR 30951), FDA published a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on the information collection
provisions.
FDA received one letter in response,
which contained several comments and
suggestions. These suggestions and
FDA’s responses follow.
The comment stated that the
collection of information in forms FDA
1815, FDA 1993, FDA 1994, FDA 1995,
FDA 1996, and FDA 1997 is necessary
and that most of these forms provide
practical information. However, the
comment requested a number of
changes to the forms. First, the comment
suggested that certification of
tuberculosis-free status in Form FDA
1815 and Form FDA 1994 should be
done in a manner consistent with the
U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
Animal Plant Health and Inspection
Service (APHIS) guidelines entitled
‘‘Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication
Uniform Methods and Rules’’ (APHIS
91–45–011). Another comment
suggested that that Form FDA 1815 and
Form FDA 1995 include a requirement
that the submitter certify that the dairy
cows are free from brucellosis and that
the certification of brucellosis-free
status should be done in a manner
consistent with the APHIS guidelines
published in the document entitled
‘‘Brucellosis Eradication: Uniform
Methods and Rules’’ (APHIS 91–45–
013).
FDA agrees that, where possible,
Federal agencies should act in a
consistent manner. However, FDA
declines to make the suggested changes
to its forms because such changes are
not necessary. The two referenced
documents are published by APHIS as
part of its national animal disease
eradication efforts undertaken by the
National Center for Animal Health
Programs under the statutory authority
provided by the Animal Health
Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 8301–8320).
These are domestic programs in the
United States which are designed to
address the general health status of U.S.
domestic cattle. Under the statutory
authority provided by FIMA, FDA
regulates all foreign-produced milk and
cream imported into the United States.
FIMA requires certification of the
general health of the animal, which
certification is obtained by FDA on
Form FDA 1995. Although the two
statutory authorities may differ, the
practices presented in the APHIS
documents already are being followed
by FDA. FDA considers the status of the
brucellosis and tuberculosis control
programs in the country offering milk
for importation into the United States
and bases its acceptance decision on
that status.
Another comment stated that Form
FDA 1996 and Form FDA 1997 do not
provide practical information and
should be made consistent with Form
FDA 2359a, which, the comment states,
is ‘‘utilized to ensure milk sanitation
standards are met at the farm level.’’
FDA disagrees that Form FDA 1996,
‘‘Dairy Farm Sanitation Report,’’ and
Form FDA 1997, ‘‘Score Card for
Sanitary Inspection of Milk Plants,’’ do
not provide practical information. The
information collected on these two
forms is used by the agency in
determining whether the imported milk
or cream offered for import meet FIMA’s
requirements for sanitary inspections of
dairy farms and plants (21 U.S.C. 142).
FDA also disagrees that the two forms
should be made consistent with Form
FDA 2359a because that form is used
domestically for inspection of facilities
producing Grade ‘‘A’’ milk products.
FDA does not use it for inspections of
facilities producing manufacturinggrade milk domestically. Thus, it would
be inappropriate for FDA to use it for
inspection of foreign facilities
manufacturing non-Grade ‘‘A’’ milk
products.
The comment also opposed electronic
submission of the forms and suggested
that several changes should be made to
the requirements of FIMA and the
agency’s related Compliance Policy
Guide. These comments are outside the
scope of the four collection of
information topics on which the notice
solicits comments and, thus, will not be
addressed here.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1.— ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
Form No.
21 CFR Section
No. of
Respondents
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
Total Hours
FDA 1815/Permits granted
on certificates
1210.23
8
1
8
0.5
4.0
FDA 1993/Application of
permit
1210.20
8
1
8
0.5
4.0
FDA 1994/Tuberculin test
1210.13
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
FDA 1995/Physical
examination of
cows
1210.12
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
FDA 1996/Sanitary inspection of dairy
farms
1210.11
8
200
1,600
1.5
2,400
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Oct 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
58711
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 194 / Friday, October 7, 2005 / Notices
TABLE 1.— ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1—Continued
Form No.
No. of
Respondents
21 CFR Section
FDA 1997/Sanitary
inspections of
plants
Annual Frequency
per Response
1210.14
8
Total Annual
Responses
1
Hours per
Response
8
Total Hours
2.0
Totals
16.0
2,425.0
1There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 2.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN1
21 CFR Section
No. of
Recordkeepers
1210.15
1There
Annual Frequency
per Record
8
Total Annual
Records
1
Hours per
Recordkeeper
8
.05
Total Hours
0.40
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
These estimates are based on the
number of current permit holders and
the number of inquiries that FDA has
received regarding requests for
applications in the past 3 years. No
burden has been estimated for the
tagging requirement in § 1210.22
because the information on the tag is
either supplied by FDA (permit number)
or is disclosed to third parties as a usual
and customary part of the shipper’s
normal business activities (type of
product, shipper’s name and address).
Under 5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2), the public
disclosure of information originally
supplied by the Federal Government to
the recipient for the purpose of
disclosure to the public is not a
collection of information. Under 5 CFR
1320.3(b)(2)), the time, effort, and
financial resources necessary to comply
with a collection of information are
excluded from the burden estimate if
the reporting, recordkeeping, or
disclosure activities needed to comply
are usual and customary because they
would occur in the normal course of
activities. Low burden has been
estimated for Forms FDA 1994 and 1995
because they are not are not used often.
The Secretary of Health and Human
Services has the discretion to allow
Form FDA 1815, a duly certified
statement signed by an accredited
official of a foreign government, to be
submitted in lieu of Forms FDA 1994
and 1995. To date, Form FDA 1815 has
been submitted in lieu of these forms.
Dated: October 3, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–20148 Filed 10–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Oct 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005N–0404]
Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of the
Pediatric Advisory Committee; Notice
of Meeting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice announces a forthcoming
meeting of the Pediatric Ethics
Subcommittee of the Pediatric Advisory
Committee of the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). The meeting will
be open to the public.
Name of Committee: Pediatric Ethics
Subcommittee of the Pediatric Advisory
Committee.
General Function of the Committee:
To provide advice and
recommendations to the Pediatric
Advisory Committee on FDA, and
certain Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS), regulatory
issues.
Date and Time: The meeting will be
held on November 15, 2005, from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m.
Addresses: Electronic copies of the
documents for public review can be
viewed at the Pediatric Advisory
Committee (PAC) Docket site at https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/
acmenu.htm. (Click on the year 2005
and scroll down to Pediatric Ethics
Subcommittee meeting for 11–15–05.)
Electronic comments should be
submitted to https://www.fda.gov/
dockets/ecomments. Select Docket No.
2005N–0404 entitled ‘‘Leuprolide IRB
Referral’’ and follow the prompts to
submit your statement. Written
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comments should be submitted to
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852. Please submit comments by
4:30 p.m. on November 1, 2005.
Received comments may be viewed on
the FDA Web site at: https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets, or may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Location: Washington DC North/
Gaithersburg Hilton, 620 Perry Pkwy.,
Gaithersburg, MD.
Contact Person: Jan N. Johannessen,
Office of the Commissioner (HF–33),
Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane (for express delivery, rm.
14C–06), Rockville, MD 20857, 301–
827–6687, or by e-mail:
jjohannessen@fda.gov. Please call the
FDA Advisory Information Line, 1–800–
741–8138 (301–443–0572 in the
Washington, DC area), code
8732310001, for up-to-date information
on this meeting.
Agenda: The Pediatric Ethics
Subcommittee of the Pediatric Advisory
Committee will meet to discuss a
referral by an Institutional Review
Board (IRB) of a proposed clinical
investigation involving children as
subjects, that is regulated by FDA and
may be supported by HHS. The
proposed clinical investigation is
entitled ‘‘Gonadotropin Releasing
Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Test in
Disorders of Puberty.’’ Because the
proposed clinical investigation would
be regulated by FDA, and conducted or
supported by HHS, both FDA and the
Office for Human Research Protections,
HHS, will participate in the meeting.
After presentation of an overview of
the IRB referral process, background
information on disorders of puberty and
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 194 (Friday, October 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58709-58711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20148]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005N-0178]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Regulations Under the Federal Import
Milk Act
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
November 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: OMB is still experiencing significant delays in the regular
mail, including first class and express mail, and messenger deliveries
are not being accepted. To ensure that comments on the information
collection are received, OMB recommends that comments be faxed to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Fumie Yokota,
Desk Officer for FDA, FAX: 202-395-6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management
Programs (HFA 250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Under the regulations implementing the Federal Import Milk Act
(FIMA) (21 U.S.C. 141-149), milk or cream may be imported into the
United States only by the holder of a valid import milk permit. Before
such permit is issued: (1) All cows from which import milk or cream is
produced must be physically examined and found healthy; (2) if the milk
or cream is imported raw, all such cows must pass a tuberculin test;
(3) the dairy farm and each plant in which the
[[Page 58710]]
milk or cream is processed or handled must be inspected and found to
meet certain sanitary requirements; (4) bacterial counts of the milk at
the time of importation must not exceed specified limits; and (5) the
temperature of the milk or cream at time of importation must not exceed
50[deg] F. In addition, the regulations in part 1210 (21 CFR part 1210)
require that dairy farmers and plants maintain pasteurization records
(Sec. 1210.15) and that each container of milk or cream imported into
the United States bear a tag with the product type, permit number, and
shipper's name and address (Sec. 1210.22).
In the Federal Register of May 31, 2005 (70 FR 30951), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the information
collection provisions.
FDA received one letter in response, which contained several
comments and suggestions. These suggestions and FDA's responses follow.
The comment stated that the collection of information in forms FDA
1815, FDA 1993, FDA 1994, FDA 1995, FDA 1996, and FDA 1997 is necessary
and that most of these forms provide practical information. However,
the comment requested a number of changes to the forms. First, the
comment suggested that certification of tuberculosis-free status in
Form FDA 1815 and Form FDA 1994 should be done in a manner consistent
with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal Plant Health and
Inspection Service (APHIS) guidelines entitled ``Bovine Tuberculosis
Eradication Uniform Methods and Rules'' (APHIS 91-45-011). Another
comment suggested that that Form FDA 1815 and Form FDA 1995 include a
requirement that the submitter certify that the dairy cows are free
from brucellosis and that the certification of brucellosis-free status
should be done in a manner consistent with the APHIS guidelines
published in the document entitled ``Brucellosis Eradication: Uniform
Methods and Rules'' (APHIS 91-45-013).
FDA agrees that, where possible, Federal agencies should act in a
consistent manner. However, FDA declines to make the suggested changes
to its forms because such changes are not necessary. The two referenced
documents are published by APHIS as part of its national animal disease
eradication efforts undertaken by the National Center for Animal Health
Programs under the statutory authority provided by the Animal Health
Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 8301-8320). These are domestic programs in the
United States which are designed to address the general health status
of U.S. domestic cattle. Under the statutory authority provided by
FIMA, FDA regulates all foreign-produced milk and cream imported into
the United States. FIMA requires certification of the general health of
the animal, which certification is obtained by FDA on Form FDA 1995.
Although the two statutory authorities may differ, the practices
presented in the APHIS documents already are being followed by FDA. FDA
considers the status of the brucellosis and tuberculosis control
programs in the country offering milk for importation into the United
States and bases its acceptance decision on that status.
Another comment stated that Form FDA 1996 and Form FDA 1997 do not
provide practical information and should be made consistent with Form
FDA 2359a, which, the comment states, is ``utilized to ensure milk
sanitation standards are met at the farm level.''
FDA disagrees that Form FDA 1996, ``Dairy Farm Sanitation Report,''
and Form FDA 1997, ``Score Card for Sanitary Inspection of Milk
Plants,'' do not provide practical information. The information
collected on these two forms is used by the agency in determining
whether the imported milk or cream offered for import meet FIMA's
requirements for sanitary inspections of dairy farms and plants (21
U.S.C. 142). FDA also disagrees that the two forms should be made
consistent with Form FDA 2359a because that form is used domestically
for inspection of facilities producing Grade ``A'' milk products. FDA
does not use it for inspections of facilities producing manufacturing-
grade milk domestically. Thus, it would be inappropriate for FDA to use
it for inspection of foreign facilities manufacturing non-Grade ``A''
milk products.
The comment also opposed electronic submission of the forms and
suggested that several changes should be made to the requirements of
FIMA and the agency's related Compliance Policy Guide. These comments
are outside the scope of the four collection of information topics on
which the notice solicits comments and, thus, will not be addressed
here.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1.-- Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per
Form No. 21 CFR Section Respondents per Response Responses Response Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA 1815/Permits granted on 1210.23 8 1 8 0.5 4.0
certificates
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA 1993/Application of 1210.20 8 1 8 0.5 4.0
permit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA 1994/Tuberculin test 1210.13 1 1 1 0.5 0.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA 1995/Physical 1210.12 1 1 1 0.5 0.5
examination of cows
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA 1996/Sanitary inspection of dairy 1210.11 8 200 1,600 1.5 2,400
farms
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 58711]]
FDA 1997/Sanitary 1210.14 8 1 8 2.0 16.0
inspections of plants
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals ................. ................. ................. ................. ................. 2,425.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Table 2.--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual Frequency per Total Annual Hours per
21 CFR Section Recordkeepers Record Records Recordkeeper Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1210.15 8 1 8 .05 0.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
These estimates are based on the number of current permit holders
and the number of inquiries that FDA has received regarding requests
for applications in the past 3 years. No burden has been estimated for
the tagging requirement in Sec. 1210.22 because the information on the
tag is either supplied by FDA (permit number) or is disclosed to third
parties as a usual and customary part of the shipper's normal business
activities (type of product, shipper's name and address). Under 5 CFR
1320.3(c)(2), the public disclosure of information originally supplied
by the Federal Government to the recipient for the purpose of
disclosure to the public is not a collection of information. Under 5
CFR 1320.3(b)(2)), the time, effort, and financial resources necessary
to comply with a collection of information are excluded from the burden
estimate if the reporting, recordkeeping, or disclosure activities
needed to comply are usual and customary because they would occur in
the normal course of activities. Low burden has been estimated for
Forms FDA 1994 and 1995 because they are not are not used often. The
Secretary of Health and Human Services has the discretion to allow Form
FDA 1815, a duly certified statement signed by an accredited official
of a foreign government, to be submitted in lieu of Forms FDA 1994 and
1995. To date, Form FDA 1815 has been submitted in lieu of these forms.
Dated: October 3, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-20148 Filed 10-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
