Internal-Combustion Forklift Trucks from Japan; Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 58373-58374 [E5-5517]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 193 / Thursday, October 6, 2005 / Notices
58373
PROPOSED FY 2007 ANNUAL MATERIALS PLAN—Continued
Material
Unit
Bauxite, Metallurgical Jamaican ........................................................................................................
Bauxite, Metallurgical Surinam ..........................................................................................................
Bauxite, Refractory ............................................................................................................................
Beryl Ore ............................................................................................................................................
Beryllium Metal ..................................................................................................................................
Beryllium Copper Master Alloy ..........................................................................................................
Chromite, Chemical ...........................................................................................................................
Chromite, Refractory ..........................................................................................................................
Chromium, Ferro ................................................................................................................................
Chromium, Metal ...............................................................................................................................
Cobalt .................................................................................................................................................
Columbium Concentrates ..................................................................................................................
Columbium Metal Ingots ....................................................................................................................
Diamond Stone ..................................................................................................................................
Fluorspar, Acid Grade .......................................................................................................................
Fluorspar, Metallurgical Grade ..........................................................................................................
Germanium ........................................................................................................................................
Graphite .............................................................................................................................................
Iodine .................................................................................................................................................
Jewel Bearings ..................................................................................................................................
Lead ...................................................................................................................................................
Manganese, Battery Grade, Natural ..................................................................................................
Manganese, Battery Grade, Synthetic ..............................................................................................
Manganese, Chemical Grade ............................................................................................................
Manganese, Ferro .............................................................................................................................
Manganese, Metallurgical Grade .......................................................................................................
Mica, All .............................................................................................................................................
Platinum .............................................................................................................................................
Platinum—Iridium ...............................................................................................................................
Quinidine ............................................................................................................................................
Talc ....................................................................................................................................................
Tantalum Carbide Powder .................................................................................................................
Tantalum Metal Powder .....................................................................................................................
Tantalum Minerals .............................................................................................................................
Tantalum Oxide .................................................................................................................................
Tin ......................................................................................................................................................
Tungsten Ferro ..................................................................................................................................
Tungsten Metal Powder .....................................................................................................................
Tungsten Ores & Concentrates .........................................................................................................
VTE, Chestnut ...................................................................................................................................
VTE, Quebracho ................................................................................................................................
VTE, Wattle ........................................................................................................................................
Zinc ....................................................................................................................................................
LDT ..........
LDT ..........
LCT ..........
ST ............
ST ............
ST ............
SDT .........
SDT .........
ST ............
ST ............
LB Co ......
LB Cb ......
LB Cb ......
ct ..............
SDT .........
SDT .........
Kg ............
ST ............
LB ............
PC ............
ST ............
SDT .........
SDT .........
SDT .........
ST ............
SDT .........
LB ............
Tr Oz .......
Tr Oz .......
Av Oz .......
ST ............
LB Ta .......
LB Ta .......
LB Ta .......
LB Ta .......
MT ...........
LB W ........
LB W ........
LB W ........
LT ............
LT ............
LT ............
ST ............
Quantity
Footnote
2,000,000
2,000
10,000
4,000
40
1,200
5,000
93,000
150,000
1,000
2,000,000
560,000
20,000
520,000
12,000
60,000
8,000
60
1,000,000
82,051,558
35,000
30,000
3,011
40,000
100,000
500,000
17,000
9,000
6,000
21,000
1,000
4,000
10,000
500,000
20,000
12,000
300,000
300,000
8,000,000
120
6,000
300
50,000
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Notes:
1. Actual quantity will be limited to remaining inventory.
[FR Doc. 05–20044 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–588–703)
Internal–Combustion Forklift Trucks
from Japan; Final Results of the
Expedited Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 1, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated a sunset review
of the antidumping duty order on
internal–combustion forklift trucks from
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:52 Oct 05, 2005
Jkt 208001
Japan pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’). The Department conducted an
expedited (120-day) sunset review of
this order. As a result of this sunset
review, the Department finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping.
The dumping margins are identified in
the Final Results of Review section of
this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 6, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Layton or David Goldberger, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
telephone: (202) 482–0371 and (202)
482–0182, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background:
On March 1, 2005, the Department
published the notice of initiation of the
second sunset review of the
antidumping duty order covering
internal–combustion forklift trucks from
Japan pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Act. See Initiation of Five-year (Sunset)
Reviews, 70 FR 9919 (March 1, 2005).
On May 16, 2005, the Department
extended the period of time for making
its determination by 90 days pursuant to
section 751(c)(5)(B) of the Act. See
Extension of Time Limits for the Final
Results of Sunset Reviews of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders, 70 FR 25808 (May 16, 2005).
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
58374
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 193 / Thursday, October 6, 2005 / Notices
The Department received the Notice of
Intent to Participate from NACCO
Materials Handling Group, Inc.
(NMHG), a domestic interested party,
within the deadline specified in section
351.218(d)(1)(i) of the Department’s
regulations (Sunset Regulations). NMHG
claimed interested party status under
section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a
manufacturer of the domestic like
product in the United States.
We received complete substantive
responses from NMHG within the 30day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no
responses from the respondent
interested parties. As a result, pursuant
to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the
Department conducted an expedited
(120-day) sunset review of this order.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order
are certain internal–combustion,
industrial forklift trucks, with lifting
capacity of 2,000 to 15,000 lbs. Imports
of these products were classified under
item numbers 692.4025, 692.4030, and
692.4070 of the Tariff Schedules of the
United States Annotated (TSUSA) and
are currently classifiable under
Harmonized System (HTSUS) item
numbers 8427.20.00, 8427.90.00, and
8431.20.00. Although the HTSUS item
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description remains dispositive.
The products covered by this order
are further described as follows:
Assembled, not assembled, and less
than complete, finished and not
finished, operator–riding forklift trucks
powered by gasoline, propane, or diesel
fuel internal–combustion engines of off–
the-highway types used in factories,
warehouses, or transportation terminals
for short–distance transport, towing, or
handling of articles. Less than complete
forklift trucks are defined as imports
which include a frame by itself or a
frame assembled with one or more
component parts. Component parts of
the subject forklift trucks which are not
assembled with a frame are not covered
by this order.
Products not covered by this order are
genuinely used forklifts. For the
purposes of this antidumping duty
order, we consider any forklift to be
used if, at the time of entry into the
United States, the importer can
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) that the forklift was manufactured
in a calendar year at least three years
prior to the year of entry into the United
States. The importer must show
documentation from industrial
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:52 Oct 05, 2005
Jkt 208001
publications that reconcile the serial
number and year of manufacture of the
forklift. If the calendar year of
manufacture is at least three years prior
to its year of entry into the United
States, it will not be subject to the
suspension of liquidation or any
assessment of antidumping duties. For
example, if a forklift is entered or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption in June 1988 and if the
importer demonstrates through
industrial publications that the forklift
was manufactured in or before calendar
year 1985, that forklift will not be
covered by this order.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Internal–Combustion Forklift Trucks
from Japan Final Results (Decision
Memo) from Barbara E. Tillman, Acting
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, to Holly A. Kuga,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated September 27,
2005, which is hereby adopted by this
notice. The issues discussed in the
Decision Memo include the likelihood
of continuation or recurrence of
dumping and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the order
were to be revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in these reviews and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in room
B–099 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn.
The paper copy and electronic version
of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on internal–
combustion forklift trucks from Japan
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping at the
following weighted–average percentage
margins:
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers
Toyota Motor Corp .....................
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd ................
Komatsu Forklift Co., Ltd ............
Sumitomo–Yale Co., Ltd ............
Toyo Umpanki Co., Ltd ..............
Sanki Industrial Co., Ltd .............
Kasagi Forklift, Inc ......................
All Others ....................................
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders
(‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305 of the Department’s regulations.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: September 27, 2005.
Holly A. Kuga,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–5517 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–843, A–560–818 and A–570–901]
Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Investigations: Certain Lined Paper
Products From India, Indonesia, and
the People’s Republic of China
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective October 6, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Hargett (India), Brandon
Farlander (Indonesia), or Charles Riggle
(People’s Republic of China), AD/CVD
Operations, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4161, (202) 482–0182 and (202)
482–0650, respectively.
AGENCY:
Initiation of Investigations
The Petitions
On September 9, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Weighted
Average
Department’’) received Petitions (‘‘the
Margin
Petitions’’) concerning imports of
(percent)
certain lined paper products (‘‘CLPP’’)
47.79 from India, Indonesia, and the People’s
51.33 Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) filed in
47.50 proper form by the Association of
51.33 American School Paper Suppliers and
51.33 its individual members (MeadWestvaco
13.65 Corporation; Norcom, Inc.; and Top
56.81
Flight, Inc.) (‘‘Petitioner’’) on behalf of
39.45
the domestic industry and workers
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58373-58374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-5517]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A-588-703)
Internal-Combustion Forklift Trucks from Japan; Final Results of
the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 1, 2005, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty order
on internal-combustion forklift trucks from Japan pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). The
Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of this
order. As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping. The dumping margins are
identified in the Final Results of Review section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 6, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Layton or David Goldberger, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0371 and (202)
482-0182, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background:
On March 1, 2005, the Department published the notice of initiation
of the second sunset review of the antidumping duty order covering
internal-combustion forklift trucks from Japan pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of Five-year (Sunset) Reviews, 70 FR
9919 (March 1, 2005). On May 16, 2005, the Department extended the
period of time for making its determination by 90 days pursuant to
section 751(c)(5)(B) of the Act. See Extension of Time Limits for the
Final Results of Sunset Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders, 70 FR 25808 (May 16, 2005).
[[Page 58374]]
The Department received the Notice of Intent to Participate from NACCO
Materials Handling Group, Inc. (NMHG), a domestic interested party,
within the deadline specified in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the
Department's regulations (Sunset Regulations). NMHG claimed interested
party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a manufacturer of
the domestic like product in the United States.
We received complete substantive responses from NMHG within the 30-
day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no
responses from the respondent interested parties. As a result, pursuant
to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2),
the Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of this
order.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order are certain internal-combustion,
industrial forklift trucks, with lifting capacity of 2,000 to 15,000
lbs. Imports of these products were classified under item numbers
692.4025, 692.4030, and 692.4070 of the Tariff Schedules of the United
States Annotated (TSUSA) and are currently classifiable under
Harmonized System (HTSUS) item numbers 8427.20.00, 8427.90.00, and
8431.20.00. Although the HTSUS item numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description remains
dispositive.
The products covered by this order are further described as
follows: Assembled, not assembled, and less than complete, finished and
not finished, operator-riding forklift trucks powered by gasoline,
propane, or diesel fuel internal-combustion engines of off-the-highway
types used in factories, warehouses, or transportation terminals for
short-distance transport, towing, or handling of articles. Less than
complete forklift trucks are defined as imports which include a frame
by itself or a frame assembled with one or more component parts.
Component parts of the subject forklift trucks which are not assembled
with a frame are not covered by this order.
Products not covered by this order are genuinely used forklifts.
For the purposes of this antidumping duty order, we consider any
forklift to be used if, at the time of entry into the United States,
the importer can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) that the forklift was manufactured in a
calendar year at least three years prior to the year of entry into the
United States. The importer must show documentation from industrial
publications that reconcile the serial number and year of manufacture
of the forklift. If the calendar year of manufacture is at least three
years prior to its year of entry into the United States, it will not be
subject to the suspension of liquidation or any assessment of
antidumping duties. For example, if a forklift is entered or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption in June 1988 and if the importer
demonstrates through industrial publications that the forklift was
manufactured in or before calendar year 1985, that forklift will not be
covered by this order.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Internal-Combustion Forklift Trucks from Japan Final
Results (Decision Memo) from Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to Holly A. Kuga, Acting
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated September 27,
2005, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in
the Decision Memo include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence
of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the
order were to be revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all
issues raised in these reviews and the corresponding recommendations in
this public memorandum which is on file in room B-099 of the main
Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memo can be
accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper
copy and electronic version of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty order on
internal-combustion forklift trucks from Japan would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the following weighted-
average percentage margins:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
Average
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toyota Motor Corp........................................... 47.79
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd....................................... 51.33
Komatsu Forklift Co., Ltd................................... 47.50
Sumitomo-Yale Co., Ltd...................................... 51.33
Toyo Umpanki Co., Ltd....................................... 51.33
Sanki Industrial Co., Ltd................................... 13.65
Kasagi Forklift, Inc........................................ 56.81
All Others.................................................. 39.45
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 of the
Department's regulations. Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective
orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 27, 2005.
Holly A. Kuga,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-5517 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
