Safety Modifications for Folsom Dam and Appurtenant Structures (Folsom Safety of Dams Project)- Sacramento, El Dorado, and Placer Counties, CA, 58469-58470 [05-20051]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 193 / Thursday, October 6, 2005 / Notices
Dated: September 19, 2005.
Edwin L. Roberson,
District Manager, Las Cruces.
[FR Doc. 05–20086 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am]
Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Reclamation
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
Notice of Filing of Plat of
Survey; Wisconsin.
ACTION:
[WO–300–1330–EO]
Notice of a 120-Day Public Comment
Period To Affirm the Policy for the
Standards To Establish the Potash
Enclave as Used To Administer the
Secretarial Order of 1986 Entitled ‘‘Oil
and Gas and Potash Leasing and
Development Within the Designated
Potash Area of Eddy and Lea Counties,
New Mexico’’
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ES–960–1420–BJ–TRST] ES–053597,
Group No. 161, Wisconsin
BILLING CODE 4310–VC–P
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) will file the plat of
survey of the lands described below in
the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield,
Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date
of publication in the Federal Register.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) originally published
this notice on Tuesday, August 30, 2005
[70 FR 51364] and solicited public
comments on the report which affirms
the existing policy on the criteria used
to establish the potash enclave. The
BLM gave the public 30 days to
comment on these Policy Standards.
The public comment period ended on
Thursday, September 29, 2005. The
BLM received numerous requests to
lengthen the comment period. The BLM
will re-issue a comment period for 120
days.
Comments should be submitted
to the address below no later than
February 3, 2006.
DATES:
Written comments should
be addressed to Group Manager, Solid
Minerals, 1620 L, Street, NW., Mail Stop
501 LS, Washington, DC 20036.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charlie Beecham, Mining Engineer,
1620 L, St., NW., Mail Stop 501 LS,
Washington, DC 20036, telephone (202)
785–6570.
Thomas Lonnie,
Assistant Director, Minerals, Realty and
Resource Protection.
[FR Doc. 05–20087 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am]
The plat of survey represents the
dependent resurvey of the Fourth
Standard Parallel North in Range 6
West, a portion of the Fourth Standard
Parallel North in Range 7 West, a
portion of the south and west
boundaries, a portion of the
subdivisional lines; and the subdivision
of certain sections, the reestablishment
of a portion of the record meander line
and a survey of a portion of the present
shore line of James Lake, and the
apportionment of the shore line frontage
to the original lots 2 and 3 in section 20,
Township 40 North, Range 6 West,
Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin,
and was accepted September 29, 2005.
We will place a copy of the plat we
described in the open files. It will be
available to the public as a matter of
information.
If BLM receives a protest against this
survey, as shown on the plat, prior to
the date of the official filing, we will
stay the filing pending our
consideration of the protest. We will not
officially file the plat until the day after
we have accepted or dismissed all
protests and they have become final,
including decisions on appeals.
ADDRESSES:
Bureau of Land Management, 7450
Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia
22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.
This
survey was requested by the Bureau of
Indian Affairs.
The lands we surveyed are:
BILLING CODE 4310–GJ–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:52 Oct 05, 2005
Jkt 208001
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and notice of public scoping meetings.
AGENCY:
Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin
T. 40 N., R. 6 W.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: September 29, 2005.
Stephen D. Douglas,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 05–20052 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P
Safety Modifications for Folsom Dam
and Appurtenant Structures (Folsom
Safety of Dams Project)— Sacramento,
El Dorado, and Placer Counties, CA
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Bureau of
Reclamation (Reclamation) intends to
prepare an EIS for the implementation
of the safety modifications for Folsom
Dam and Appurtenant Structures
(Folsom Safety of Dams Project).
Reclamation seeks to improve public
safety by modifying Folsom Facilities
and its appurtenant structures (Folsom
Facilities) to mitigate issues identified
in previous and ongoing safety
evaluations. Studies are being
conducted by Reclamation to identify
alternatives (modifications) to address
these conditions.
Engineering, Economic, and
Environmental studies are being
conducted to help determine reasonable
design alternatives. Information
gathered from the EIS process will be
used in conjunction with engineering
and economic principles to determine
preferred alternatives.
DATES: Reclamation will seek public
input on alternatives, concerns, and
issues to be addressed in the EIS
through scoping meetings on Tuesday,
November 1 and Thursday, November 3,
2005, from 6:30 to 9 p.m. in Folsom,
California.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice.
58469
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The public scoping
meetings will be held at the Folsom
Community Center, 52 Natoma Street in
Folsom, California 95630.
Send written comments on the scope
of alternatives and impacts to be
considered to Mr. Shawn Oliver at the
address below, no later than 2 weeks
after the second scheduled public
scoping meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Shawn Oliver, Bureau of Reclamation,
7794 Folsom Dam Road, Folsom,
California 95630; telephone number
(916) 989–7256; e-mail
soliver@mp.usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Reclamation seeks to mitigate potential
safety issues identified in previous and
ongoing studies for the Folsom Dam
complex, including Main Folsom Dam,
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
58470
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 193 / Thursday, October 6, 2005 / Notices
the two wing dams, Mormon Island
Auxiliary Dam, and the eight dikes.
Retrofitting and increasing the flood
control capacity of the Folsom Dam and
its appurtenant structures are currently
being studied. Locating and extracting
adequate borrow materials for
embankment modifications will be a
major component of the project.
Reclamation has determined that an EIS
is warranted to examine the potential
impacts for implementation of the
Folsom CAS Project on the natural and
human environment.
Potential Modification Alternatives to
the Folsom Dam and appurtenant
structures are being identified to reduce
risks associated with:
1. Major Flood Events
2. Earthquakes
3. Seepage and Piping through
Embankments
Folsom Dam and Embankment
Hydrologic Alternatives include, but are
not limited to:
1. Embankment Raise Options
2. Auxiliary Spillway on the Left
Abutment Options
Folsom Dam and Embankment
Seismic and Static Alternatives include,
but are not limited to:
1. Mormon Island Auxiliary Dam
Seismic Alternatives
2. Concrete Dam Seismic Options
3. Folsom Dam and Embankment
Static Alternatives
If special assistance is required at the
scoping meetings, please contact Mr.
Shawn Oliver, Bureau of Reclamation,
at (916) 989–7256. Please notify Mr.
Oliver as far in advance of the meetings
as possible to enable Reclamation to
secure the needed services. If a request
cannot be honored, the requestor will be
notified.
Reclamation’s policy is to make
comments, including names and home
addresses of respondents, available for
public review. Individual respondents
may request that we withhold their
name and/or home address from public
disclosure, which Reclamation will
honor to the extent allowable by law. If
you wish us to withhold your name
and/or address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. Reclamation will make all
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public disclosure in their entirety.
Dated: August 25, 2005.
Michael Nepstad,
Deputy Regional Environmental Officer, MidPacific Region.
[FR Doc. 05–20051 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MW–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:52 Oct 05, 2005
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on
September 19, 2005, a proposed Consent
Decree (‘‘Consent Decree’’) in United
States v. Eliskim, Inc. et al., Civil Action
No. 1:05CV2196 was lodged with the
United States District Court for the
Northern District of Ohio, Eastern
Division.
In this action, the United States, on
behalf of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency
(‘‘EPA’’), sought to recover response
costs from Eliskim, Inc. (‘‘Eliskim’’) and
the City of Geneva, Ohio (‘‘City’’)
pursuant to Section 107 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 107. The
response costs were incurred in
response to releases and threatened
releases of hazardous substances from
the True Temper Sports Superfund Site
located in the City of Geneva, Ohio (the
‘‘Site’’). The Consent Decree would
require Eliskim and the City to pay
respectively $56,500 and $12,500
toward the response costs incurred by
EPA, which are presently estimated to
be $118,000. The Consent Decree would
resolve Eliskim’s liability for: (1) Past
response costs at the Site; and (2) costs,
penalties, and fees pursuant to an
Administrative Order by Consent at the
Site. To the extent provided by the
Consent Decree, certain specified
benefits of the settlement would also
extend to Eliskim’s parent corporation,
American Household, Inc. Finally, the
Consent Decree would grant the City a
de minimis covenant not to sue
pursuant to Section 122(g) of CERCLA,
42 U.S.C. 9622(g).
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States v. Eliskim, Inc., et al., No.
1:05CV2196 (N.D. Ohio), D.J. Ref. 90–
11–2–1310/1.
The Consent Decree may be examined
at the Office of the United States
Attorney, 801 West Superior Avenue,
Suite 400, Cleveland, Ohio 44113–1852,
and at U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, 14th Floor, Chicago,
Illinois. During the public comment
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
period, the Consent Decree may also be
examined on the following Department
of Justice Web site, https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. A copy
of the Consent Decree may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a
request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library,
please enclose a check in the amount of
$17.25 (25 cents per page reproduction
cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury.
William D. Brighton,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. 05–20041 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Amended Notice of Lodging of
Settlement Agreement Pursuant to the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act and the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
In accordance with 28 CFR 50.7 and
42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given
that on September 13, 2005, a
Settlement Agreement was lodged with
the United States District Court for the
District of Puerto Rico in United States
v. Tropical Fruit, S.E., et al., Civil
Action No. 97–1442–DRD. On October
25, 2001, the Court entered a Consent
Decree between the United States, on
behalf of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), and
Defendants pursuant to the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (‘‘FIFRA’’), 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq., and
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.,
with respect to a Farm located in Rural
Zone Boca, Guayanilla, Puerto Rico. The
Consent Decree required Defendants to
pay $35,000 in penalties and CERCLA
response costs and to comply with
extensive injunctive relief measures,
including the creation of a no-spray
buffer zone on the northern and a
portion of the western perimeter of the
Farm which will vary in width up to
173 feet. In December 2004, the United
States filed a Motion to Enforce the
Consent Decree and for stipulated
penalties in that the United States
alleged that Defendants violated certain
provisions of the Consent Decree
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58469-58470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20051]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Safety Modifications for Folsom Dam and Appurtenant Structures
(Folsom Safety of Dams Project)-- Sacramento, El Dorado, and Placer
Counties, CA
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and notice of public scoping meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation)
intends to prepare an EIS for the implementation of the safety
modifications for Folsom Dam and Appurtenant Structures (Folsom Safety
of Dams Project). Reclamation seeks to improve public safety by
modifying Folsom Facilities and its appurtenant structures (Folsom
Facilities) to mitigate issues identified in previous and ongoing
safety evaluations. Studies are being conducted by Reclamation to
identify alternatives (modifications) to address these conditions.
Engineering, Economic, and Environmental studies are being
conducted to help determine reasonable design alternatives. Information
gathered from the EIS process will be used in conjunction with
engineering and economic principles to determine preferred
alternatives.
DATES: Reclamation will seek public input on alternatives, concerns,
and issues to be addressed in the EIS through scoping meetings on
Tuesday, November 1 and Thursday, November 3, 2005, from 6:30 to 9 p.m.
in Folsom, California.
ADDRESSES: The public scoping meetings will be held at the Folsom
Community Center, 52 Natoma Street in Folsom, California 95630.
Send written comments on the scope of alternatives and impacts to
be considered to Mr. Shawn Oliver at the address below, no later than 2
weeks after the second scheduled public scoping meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Shawn Oliver, Bureau of
Reclamation, 7794 Folsom Dam Road, Folsom, California 95630; telephone
number (916) 989-7256; e-mail soliver@mp.usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Reclamation seeks to mitigate potential
safety issues identified in previous and ongoing studies for the Folsom
Dam complex, including Main Folsom Dam,
[[Page 58470]]
the two wing dams, Mormon Island Auxiliary Dam, and the eight dikes.
Retrofitting and increasing the flood control capacity of the Folsom
Dam and its appurtenant structures are currently being studied.
Locating and extracting adequate borrow materials for embankment
modifications will be a major component of the project. Reclamation has
determined that an EIS is warranted to examine the potential impacts
for implementation of the Folsom CAS Project on the natural and human
environment.
Potential Modification Alternatives to the Folsom Dam and
appurtenant structures are being identified to reduce risks associated
with:
1. Major Flood Events
2. Earthquakes
3. Seepage and Piping through Embankments
Folsom Dam and Embankment Hydrologic Alternatives include, but are
not limited to:
1. Embankment Raise Options
2. Auxiliary Spillway on the Left Abutment Options
Folsom Dam and Embankment Seismic and Static Alternatives include,
but are not limited to:
1. Mormon Island Auxiliary Dam Seismic Alternatives
2. Concrete Dam Seismic Options
3. Folsom Dam and Embankment Static Alternatives
If special assistance is required at the scoping meetings, please
contact Mr. Shawn Oliver, Bureau of Reclamation, at (916) 989-7256.
Please notify Mr. Oliver as far in advance of the meetings as possible
to enable Reclamation to secure the needed services. If a request
cannot be honored, the requestor will be notified.
Reclamation's policy is to make comments, including names and home
addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual
respondents may request that we withhold their name and/or home address
from public disclosure, which Reclamation will honor to the extent
allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address,
you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comment.
Reclamation will make all submissions from organizations or businesses,
and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or
officials of organizations or businesses, available for public
disclosure in their entirety.
Dated: August 25, 2005.
Michael Nepstad,
Deputy Regional Environmental Officer, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 05-20051 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MW-P