Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho; Correcting Amendment, 58311-58313 [05-19615]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 193 / Thursday, October 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
2004, Public Law 108–419, 118 Stat.
2341.
h. In paragraph (b)(2), by removing
‘‘$189,800’’ each place it appears, and
adding ‘‘$263,800’’ in its place, and by
removing ‘‘$379,600’’ each place it
appears and adding ‘‘$527,600’’ in its
place.
I
List of Subjects
37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, Procedures.
Dated: September 13, 2005
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
Approved by:
James H. Billington,
The Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. 05–20096 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am]
37 CFR Part 256
Cable television, Royalties.
Final Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Library amends 37 CFR
parts 201 and 256 as follows:
I
BILLING CODE 1410–33–S
PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
I
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702
§ 201.17
40 CFR Part 52
[Amended]
2. Section 201.17 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (d)(2), by removing
‘‘$379,600’’ each place it appears and
adding ‘‘$527,600’’ in its place;
I b. In paragraph (e)(12), by removing
‘‘$98,600’’ and adding ‘‘$137,100’’ in its
place; and
I c. In paragraph (g)(2)(ii), by removing
‘‘0.956’’ and adding ‘‘1.013’’ in its place.
I
PART 256—ADJUSTMENT OF
ROYALTY FEE FOR CABLE
COMPULSORY LICENSE
3. The authority citation for part 256
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702, 802
§ 256.2
[Amended]
4. Section 256.2 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (a) introductory text,
by removing the phrase ‘‘the second
semiannual accounting period of 2000’’
and adding the phrase ‘‘the second
semiannual accounting period of 2005’’
in its place;
I b. In paragraph (a)(1), by removing
‘‘.956’’ and adding ‘‘1.013’’ in its place;
I c. In paragraph (a)(2), by removing
‘‘.956’’ and adding ‘‘1.013’’ in its place;
I d. In paragraph (a)(3), by removing
‘‘.630’’ and adding ‘‘.668’’ in its place;
I e. In paragraph (a)(4), by removing
‘‘.296’’ and adding ‘‘.314’’ in its place;
I f. In paragraph (b) introductory text,
by removing the phrase ‘‘the second
semiannual accounting period of 2000’’
and adding the phrase ‘‘the second
semiannual accounting period of 2005’’
in its place;
I g. In paragraph (b)(1), by removing
‘‘$189,800’’ each place it appears and
adding ‘‘$263,800’’ in its place, and by
removing $7,400’’ and adding ‘‘$10,400’’
in its place; and
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Oct 05, 2005
Jkt 208001
[R10–OAR–2005–ID–0002; FRL–7977–5]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Idaho;
Correcting Amendment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this final action, EPA is
correcting an error in the incorporation
by reference provisions in the approval
of revisions to the Rules for the Control
of Air Pollution in Idaho (IDAPA
58.01.01) published on January 16, 2003
(68 FR 2217). This correction removes
the list of State toxic air pollutants from
the definition of ‘‘regulated air
pollutant’’ in the EPA-approved Idaho
State implementation plan.
DATES: This action is effective on
November 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the State’s request
and other supporting information used
in developing this action are available
for inspection during normal business
hours at the following locations: EPA,
Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics (AWT–
107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,
Washington 98101. Interested persons
wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the
appropriate office at least 24 hours
before the visiting day. A reasonable fee
may be charged for copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David C. Bray, Office of Air, Waste and
Toxics, AWT–107, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200
Sixth Ave., Seattle, WA 98101; phone:
(206) 553–4253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. This Action
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58311
A. What Comments Did We Receive on the
Proposed Action?
B. What Is the Basis for This Action?
C. What Is our Final Action?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On January 16, 2003 (68 FR 2217),
EPA approved numerous changes to the
Idaho Department of Environmental
Quality (IDEQ) rules as revisions to the
Idaho State implementation plan (SIP).
In that rulemaking, EPA did not approve
the IDEQ rules for toxic air pollutants or
TAP’s and specifically excluded the
toxic air pollutant provisions (IDAPA
58.01.01.203.03, 210, 223, 585, and 586)
from its incorporation by reference. See
40 CFR 52.670(c)(37); 68 FR at 2224
(January 16, 2003); 67 FR 52666, 52668,
52672–73 (August 13, 2002). However,
EPA inadvertently incorporated a cross
reference to the toxic air pollutant
provisions (Sections 585 and 586)
within the IDEQ definition of ‘‘regulated
air pollutant’’ (IDAPA 58.01.01.006(84)).
It was EPA’s intention to exclude all
aspects of the IDEQ toxic air pollutant
program from the federally-approved
SIP.
EPA also received a request from the
IDEQ to correct the inadvertent
incorporation by reference. In an
October 20, 2004 letter to EPA, the
Administrator of the IDEQ Air Quality
Division requested that EPA clarify or
correct its approval of the Idaho SIP.
On July 20, 2005, EPA proposed to
correct this error by amending the
incorporation by reference of the Idaho
SIP to exclude paragraph (f) from the
definition of ‘‘regulated air pollutant’’ at
IDAPA 58.01.01.006(84).
II. This Action
A. What Comments Did We Receive on
the Proposed Action?
EPA provided a 30-day review and
comment period on the proposal
published in the Federal Register on
July 20, 2005. 70 FR 41652. We received
no comments on our proposed
rulemaking.
B. What Is the Basis for This Action?
Under section 110(k)(6) of the Clean
Air Act, whenever EPA determines that
its action approving, disapproving, or
promulgating any plan or plan revision
(or part thereof), area designation,
redesignation, classification, or
reclassification was in error, EPA may
in the same manner as the approval,
disapproval, or promulgation revise
such action as appropriate without
requiring any further submission from
the state. Such determination and the
basis thereof shall be provided to the
state and public. Pursuant to section
E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM
06OCR1
58312
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 193 / Thursday, October 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
110(k)(6), EPA proposed a revision to
the Idaho SIP to correct the inadvertent
incorporation by reference of the Idaho
toxic air pollutant provisions within the
definition of ‘‘regulated air pollutant.’’
C. What Is Our Final Action?
EPA is taking final action to correct
the incorporation by reference of the
Idaho toxic air pollutant provisions so
that IDEQ’s list of toxic air pollutants
will not be considered to be ‘‘regulated
air pollutants’’ for purposes of the
federally-approved SIP. All of the air
pollutants regulated under the federal
Clean Air Act will still be ‘‘regulated air
pollutants’’ for SIP purposes in
accordance with the IDEQ definition.
The corrected definition meets or
exceeds the requirements of the federal
Clean Air Act and EPA’s regulations for
State implementation plans. The
corrected definition is also consistent
with IDEQ’s SIP submittal and EPA’s
January 16, 2003 approval action which
specifically excluded IDEQ’s toxic air
pollutant rules from the EPA-approved
SIP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this final action
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
and therefore is not subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget.
For this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely corrects
the incorporation by reference of the list
of toxic air pollutants used in regulatory
provisions that are not part of the EPAapproved SIP and does not impose any
additional requirements on state, local
or tribal governments or the private
sector. Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Oct 05, 2005
Jkt 208001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
corrects the incorporation by reference
of the list of State toxic air pollutants as
initially requested by the State and does
not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045, ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by December 5,
2005. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: September 20, 2005.
Julie M. Hagensen,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N—Idaho
2. In § 52.670(c), the table is amended
by revising the entry for 006 to read as
follows:
I
§ 52.670
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM
06OCR1
*
*
58313
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 193 / Thursday, October 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED IDAHO REGULATIONS
State citation
State effective
date
Title/subject
EPA approval date
Explanations
Idaho Administrative Procedures Act (IDAPA) Chapter 58, Rules for Control of Air Pollution in Idaho, Previously Codified at IDAPA
Chapter 39 (Appendix A.3)
58.01.01—RULES FOR THE CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION IN IDAHO
*
*
*
006 ........................................ General Definitions ...............
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–19615 Filed 10–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R03–OAR–2004–PA–0001, R03–OAR–2004–
PA–0002; FRL–7980–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Revision to the Motor
Vehicle Enhanced I/M Program—
Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, South
Central, and Northern Regions and
Safety Inspection Program
Enhancements for Non-I/M Regions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving several
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These
revisions amend Pennsylvania‘s
existing, Federally-approved enhanced
vehicle inspection and maintenance
program (or I/M program) SIP. EPA is
herein taking a single final rulemaking
action to finalize two separately issued
proposed rulemakings on the subject of
Pennsylvania’s I/M program. The
intended effect of this combined final
action is to approve the
Commonwealth’s revised I/M program
SIP for the Philadelphia, Pittsburgh,
South Central and Northern Regions.
This action also serves to incorporate
into the SIP a visual emission
component inspection program done
under the Commonwealth’s annual
safety inspection program in those 42
counties of Pennsylvania not subject to
Federal I/M program requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
November 7, 2005.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Oct 05, 2005
*
4/5/00, 3/20/97,
5/1/95, 5/1/94
Jkt 208001
*
*
*
01/16/03, 68 FR 2217 10/6/
Except (84)(f)
05 [Insert page number
where the document begins].
*
EPA has established two
dockets for this action under Regional
Material in E-Docket (RME) ID Number
R03–OAR–2004–PA–0001 and Number
R03–OAR–2004–PA–0002. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the RME index at https://
www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Once in
the system, select Aquick search,’’ then
key in the appropriate RME
identification number for each docket.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in hard copy for public inspection
during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O.
Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Rehn, at (215) 814–2176, or by email at rehn.brian@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Background
EPA published two concurrent
notices of proposed rulemaking (NPR)
on April 26, 2005 proposing to approve
two separate SIP revisions submitted by
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
One of these April 26, 2005 NPRs (70 FR
21384) proposed approval of the
Commonwealth’s revised motor vehicle
enhanced I/M program as it applies to
select geographic regions of
Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania regions
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
affected by that rulemaking action
include the South Central Region
(Berks, Cumberland, Dauphin,
Lancaster, Lebanon, Lehigh,
Northampton, and York Counties) and
the Northern Region (Blair, Cambria,
Centre, Lackawanna, Luzerne,
Lycoming, and Mercer Counties). EPA
also proposed to approve portions of
Pennsylvania’s revised safety inspection
program (for areas not subject to Federal
enhanced I/M requirements) related to
visual inspection of certain vehicle
components that serve to reduce
emissions. This emission component
visual inspection element of the state
safety inspection program is a new
requirement for 42 Pennsylvania
counties (see EPA’s NPR for the
complete list of affected counties). The
Commonwealth’s formal SIP revision,
which was the subject of this notice,
was submitted by Pennsylvania on
December 1, 2003, and was revised via
a technical SIP amendment submitted
by Pennsylvania on April 29, 2004.
In the second of April 26, 2005 (70 FR
21380) rulemaking actions regarding
Pennsylvania’s I/M, EPA proposed
approval of the revised enhanced I/M
programs applicable in the Pittsburgh
Region (Allegheny, Beaver, Washington,
and Westmoreland Counties) and the
Philadelphia Region (Bucks, Chester,
Delaware, Montgomery, and
Philadelphia Counties). The
Commonwealth submitted a formal SIP
revision on January 30, 2004 applicable
only to these two Regions. This SIP
revision was also revised by
Pennsylvania via a technical SIP
amendment submitted to EPA on April
29, 2004.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
EPA granted prior SIP approval to
Pennsylvania’s previously adopted I/M
SIP in June 1999. Pennsylvania
submitted formal SIP revisions to
amend that SIP-approved I/M program
E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM
06OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58311-58313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19615]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R10-OAR-2005-ID-0002; FRL-7977-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho;
Correcting Amendment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this final action, EPA is correcting an error in the
incorporation by reference provisions in the approval of revisions to
the Rules for the Control of Air Pollution in Idaho (IDAPA 58.01.01)
published on January 16, 2003 (68 FR 2217). This correction removes the
list of State toxic air pollutants from the definition of ``regulated
air pollutant'' in the EPA-approved Idaho State implementation plan.
DATES: This action is effective on November 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the State's request and other supporting
information used in developing this action are available for inspection
during normal business hours at the following locations: EPA, Office of
Air, Waste, and Toxics (AWT-107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,
Washington 98101. Interested persons wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the appropriate office at least 24
hours before the visiting day. A reasonable fee may be charged for
copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David C. Bray, Office of Air, Waste
and Toxics, AWT-107, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200
Sixth Ave., Seattle, WA 98101; phone: (206) 553-4253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. This Action
A. What Comments Did We Receive on the Proposed Action?
B. What Is the Basis for This Action?
C. What Is our Final Action?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On January 16, 2003 (68 FR 2217), EPA approved numerous changes to
the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) rules as revisions
to the Idaho State implementation plan (SIP). In that rulemaking, EPA
did not approve the IDEQ rules for toxic air pollutants or TAP's and
specifically excluded the toxic air pollutant provisions (IDAPA
58.01.01.203.03, 210, 223, 585, and 586) from its incorporation by
reference. See 40 CFR 52.670(c)(37); 68 FR at 2224 (January 16, 2003);
67 FR 52666, 52668, 52672-73 (August 13, 2002). However, EPA
inadvertently incorporated a cross reference to the toxic air pollutant
provisions (Sections 585 and 586) within the IDEQ definition of
``regulated air pollutant'' (IDAPA 58.01.01.006(84)). It was EPA's
intention to exclude all aspects of the IDEQ toxic air pollutant
program from the federally-approved SIP.
EPA also received a request from the IDEQ to correct the
inadvertent incorporation by reference. In an October 20, 2004 letter
to EPA, the Administrator of the IDEQ Air Quality Division requested
that EPA clarify or correct its approval of the Idaho SIP.
On July 20, 2005, EPA proposed to correct this error by amending
the incorporation by reference of the Idaho SIP to exclude paragraph
(f) from the definition of ``regulated air pollutant'' at IDAPA
58.01.01.006(84).
II. This Action
A. What Comments Did We Receive on the Proposed Action?
EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period on the proposal
published in the Federal Register on July 20, 2005. 70 FR 41652. We
received no comments on our proposed rulemaking.
B. What Is the Basis for This Action?
Under section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act, whenever EPA
determines that its action approving, disapproving, or promulgating any
plan or plan revision (or part thereof), area designation,
redesignation, classification, or reclassification was in error, EPA
may in the same manner as the approval, disapproval, or promulgation
revise such action as appropriate without requiring any further
submission from the state. Such determination and the basis thereof
shall be provided to the state and public. Pursuant to section
[[Page 58312]]
110(k)(6), EPA proposed a revision to the Idaho SIP to correct the
inadvertent incorporation by reference of the Idaho toxic air pollutant
provisions within the definition of ``regulated air pollutant.''
C. What Is Our Final Action?
EPA is taking final action to correct the incorporation by
reference of the Idaho toxic air pollutant provisions so that IDEQ's
list of toxic air pollutants will not be considered to be ``regulated
air pollutants'' for purposes of the federally-approved SIP. All of the
air pollutants regulated under the federal Clean Air Act will still be
``regulated air pollutants'' for SIP purposes in accordance with the
IDEQ definition. The corrected definition meets or exceeds the
requirements of the federal Clean Air Act and EPA's regulations for
State implementation plans. The corrected definition is also consistent
with IDEQ's SIP submittal and EPA's January 16, 2003 approval action
which specifically excluded IDEQ's toxic air pollutant rules from the
EPA-approved SIP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
final action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore
is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely corrects the incorporation by reference of the list of toxic air
pollutants used in regulatory provisions that are not part of the EPA-
approved SIP and does not impose any additional requirements on state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely corrects the
incorporation by reference of the list of State toxic air pollutants as
initially requested by the State and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045,
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 5, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: September 20, 2005.
Julie M. Hagensen,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
0
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N--Idaho
0
2. In Sec. 52.670(c), the table is amended by revising the entry for
006 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.670 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 58313]]
EPA-Approved Idaho Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective
State citation Title/subject date EPA approval date Explanations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Idaho Administrative Procedures Act (IDAPA) Chapter 58, Rules for Control of Air Pollution in Idaho, Previously
Codified at IDAPA Chapter 39 (Appendix A.3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
58.01.01--RULES FOR THE CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION IN IDAHO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
006............................. General Definitions 4/5/00, 3/20/97, 01/16/03, 68 FR Except (84)(f)
5/1/95, 5/1/94 2217 10/6/05
[Insert page
number where the
document begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 05-19615 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P