Medicare Program; Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems and Fiscal Year 2006 Rates; Correcting Amendment, 57785-57786 [05-19924]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations from the production of carbamates and carbamoyl oximes (EPA Hazardous Waste No. K157)—Provided that the maximum weekly usage of formaldehyde, methyl chloride, methylene chloride, and triethylamine (including all amounts that cannot be demonstrated to be reacted in the process, destroyed through treatment, or is recovered, i.e., what is discharged or volatilized) divided by the average weekly flow of process wastewater prior to any dilution into the headworks of the facility’s wastewater treatment system does not exceed a total of 5 parts per million by weight OR the total measured concentration of these chemicals entering the headworks of the facility’s wastewater treatment system (at facilities subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act as amended, at 40 CFR parts 60, 61, or 63, or at facilities subject to an enforceable limit in a federal operating permit that minimizes fugitive emissions), does not exceed 5 parts per million on an average weekly basis. Facilities that choose to measure concentration levels must file copy of their sampling and analysis plan with the Regional Administrator, or State Director, as the context requires, or an authorized representative (‘‘Director’’ as defined in 40 CFR 270.2). A facility must file a copy of a revised sampling and analysis plan only if the initial plan is rendered inaccurate by changes in the facility’s operations. The sampling and analysis plan must include the monitoring point location (headworks), the sampling frequency and methodology, and a list of constituents to be monitored. A facility is eligible for the direct monitoring option once they receive confirmation that the sampling and analysis plan has been received by the Director. The Director may reject the sampling and analysis plan if he/she finds that, the sampling and analysis plan fails to include the above information; or the plan parameters would not enable the facility to calculate the weekly average concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the Director rejects the sampling and analysis plan or if the Director finds that the facility is not following the sampling and analysis plan, the Director shall notify the facility to cease the use of the direct monitoring option until such time as the bases for rejection are corrected; or (G) Wastewaters derived-from the treatment of one or more of the following wastes listed in § 261.32— organic waste (including heavy ends, still bottoms, light ends, spent solvents, filtrates, and decantates) from the production of carbamates and VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:33 Oct 03, 2005 Jkt 208002 carbamoyl oximes (EPA Hazardous Waste No. K156).—Provided, that the maximum concentration of formaldehyde, methyl chloride, methylene chloride, and triethylamine prior to any dilutions into the headworks of the facility’s wastewater treatment system does not exceed a total of 5 milligrams per liter OR the total measured concentration of these chemicals entering the headworks of the facility’s wastewater treatment system (at facilities subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act as amended, at 40 CFR parts 60, 61, or 63, or at facilities subject to an enforceable limit in a federal operating permit that minimizes fugitive emissions), does not exceed 5 milligrams per liter on an average weekly basis. Facilities that choose to measure concentration levels must file copy of their sampling and analysis plan with the Regional Administrator, or State Director, as the context requires, or an authorized representative (‘‘Director’’ as defined in 40 CFR 270.2). A facility must file a copy of a revised sampling and analysis plan only if the initial plan is rendered inaccurate by changes in the facility’s operations. The sampling and analysis plan must include the monitoring point location (headworks), the sampling frequency and methodology, and a list of constituents to be monitored. A facility is eligible for the direct monitoring option once they receive confirmation that the sampling and analysis plan has been received by the Director. The Director may reject the sampling and analysis plan if he/she finds that, the sampling and analysis plan fails to include the above information; or the plan parameters would not enable the facility to calculate the weekly average concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the Director rejects the sampling and analysis plan or if the Director finds that the facility is not following the sampling and analysis plan, the Director shall notify the facility to cease the use of the direct monitoring option until such time as the bases for rejection are corrected. * * * * * [FR Doc. 05–19841 Filed 10–3–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 57785 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 42 CFR Parts 405, 412, 413, 415, 419, 422, and 485 [CMS–1500–F2] RIN–0938–AN57 Medicare Program; Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems and Fiscal Year 2006 Rates; Correcting Amendment Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document corrects technical errors in the final rule that appeared in the August 12, 2005 Federal Register entitled ‘‘Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems and Fiscal Year 2006 Rates.’’ EFFECTIVE DATE: This correcting amendment is effective August 12, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marc Hartstein, (410) 786–4548. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background and Summary of Errors In FR Doc. 05–15406 (70 FR 47278), the final rule entitled ‘‘Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems and Fiscal Year 2006 Rates’’ (hereinafter referred to as the FY 2006 final rule), there were technical errors that are identified and corrected in the regulations text of this correcting amendment. The provisions of this correcting amendment are effective August 12, 2005. On page 47487 of the FY 2006 final rule, we made technical errors in the regulation text of § 412.230(d)(2)(iii). In this paragraph, we inadvertently omitted qualifying language related to our reclassification policy. Accordingly, we are revising § 412.230(d)(2)(iii) to accurately reflect our policy on reclassification of a campus of a multicampus hospital. Therefore, on page 47487 first column, lines 23 through 25, the phrase ‘‘may seek reclassification to a CBSA in which another campus(es) is located’’ would be corrected to read ‘‘may seek reclassification only to a CBSA in which another campus(es) is located’’ and on lines 29 and 30, the phrase ‘‘may submit’’ would be corrected to read ‘‘must submit.’’ E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM 04OCR1 57786 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations II. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date We ordinarily publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register to provide a period for public comment before the provisions of a rule take effect in accordance with section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However, we can waive the notice and comment procedures if the Secretary finds, for good cause, that the notice and comment process is impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates a statement of the finding and the reasons therefore in the rule. We can also waive the 30-day delay in effective date under the APA (5 U.S.C. 553(d)) when there is good cause to do so and we publish in the rule an explanation of our good cause. Our policy on reclassification of a campus of a multicampus hospital in the FY 2006 final rule has previously been subjected to notice and comment procedures. These corrections are consistent with the discussion of this policy in the FY2006 final rule and do not make substantive changes to this policy. This correcting amendment merely corrects technical errors in the regulations text of the FY 2006 final rule. As a result, this correcting amendment is intended to ensure that the FY 2006 final rule accurately reflects the policy adopted in the final rule. Therefore, we find that undertaking further notice and comment procedures to incorporate these corrections into the final rule is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest. For the same reasons, we are also waiving the 30-day delay in effective date for this correcting amendment. We believe that it is in the public interest to ensure that the FY 2006 final rule accurately states our policy on reclassification of a campus of a multicampus hospital. Thus delaying the effective date of these corrections would be contrary to the public interest. Therefore, we also find good cause to waive the 30-day delay in effective date. § 412.230 Criteria for an individual hospital seeking redesignation to another rural area or an urban area. * III. Correction of Regulation Text Errors Given the errors summarized in section I of this correcting amendment, we are making the following correcting amendments to 42 CFR Part 412: PART 412—PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Section 412.230 is amended by revising paragraph (d)(2)(iii) to read as follows: I VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:33 Oct 03, 2005 Jkt 208002 * * * * (d) (2) * * * (iii) For applications submitted for reclassifications effective in FYs 2006 through 2008, a campus of a multicampus hospital may seek reclassification only to a CBSA in which another campus(es) is located. If the campus is seeking reclassification to a CBSA in which another campus(es) is located, as part of its reclassification request, the requesting entity must submit the composite wage data for the entire multicampus hospital as its hospital-specific data. * * * * * (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare—Supplementary Medical Insurance Program) Dated: September 29, 2005. Ann C. Agnew, Executive Secretary to the Department. [FR Doc. 05–19924 Filed 9–30–05; 11:06 am] BILLING CODE 4120–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency 44 CFR Part 65 [Docket No. FEMA–P–7646] Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Interim rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This interim rule lists communities where modification of the Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) is appropriate because of new scientific or technical data. New flood insurance premium rates will be calculated from the modified BFEs for new buildings and their contents. DATES: These modified BFEs are currently in effect on the dates listed in the table below and revise the Flood Insurance Rate Map(s) in effect prior to this determination for the listed communities. From the date of the second publication of these changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90) days in which to PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 request through the community that the Mitigation Division Director of the Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate reconsider the changes. The modified BFEs may be changed during the 90-day period. ADDRESSES: The modified BFEs for each community are available for inspection at the office of the Chief Executive Officer of each community. The respective addresses are listed in the table below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Bellomo, P.E., Hazard Identification Section, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2903. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The modified BFEs are not listed for each community in this interim rule. However, the address of the Chief Executive Officer of the community where the modified BFE determinations are available for inspection is provided. Any request for reconsideration must be based on knowledge of changed conditions or new scientific or technical data. The modifications are made pursuant to Section 201 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR Part 65. For rating purposes, the currently effective community number is shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals. The modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management measures that the community is required to either adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or to remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). These modified BFEs, together with the floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter requirements of its own, or pursuant to policies established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. The changes in BFEs are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4. National Environmental Policy Act. This rule is categorically excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR Part 10, Environmental Consideration. No E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM 04OCR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57785-57786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19924]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

42 CFR Parts 405, 412, 413, 415, 419, 422, and 485

[CMS-1500-F2]
RIN-0938-AN57


Medicare Program; Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective 
Payment Systems and Fiscal Year 2006 Rates; Correcting Amendment

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects technical errors in the final rule that 
appeared in the August 12, 2005 Federal Register entitled ``Changes to 
the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems and Fiscal Year 2006 
Rates.''

EFFECTIVE DATE: This correcting amendment is effective August 12, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marc Hartstein, (410) 786-4548.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background and Summary of Errors

    In FR Doc. 05-15406 (70 FR 47278), the final rule entitled 
``Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems and 
Fiscal Year 2006 Rates'' (hereinafter referred to as the FY 2006 final 
rule), there were technical errors that are identified and corrected in 
the regulations text of this correcting amendment. The provisions of 
this correcting amendment are effective August 12, 2005.
    On page 47487 of the FY 2006 final rule, we made technical errors 
in the regulation text of Sec.  412.230(d)(2)(iii). In this paragraph, 
we inadvertently omitted qualifying language related to our 
reclassification policy. Accordingly, we are revising Sec.  
412.230(d)(2)(iii) to accurately reflect our policy on reclassification 
of a campus of a multicampus hospital. Therefore, on page 47487 first 
column, lines 23 through 25, the phrase ``may seek reclassification to 
a CBSA in which another campus(es) is located'' would be corrected to 
read ``may seek reclassification only to a CBSA in which another 
campus(es) is located'' and on lines 29 and 30, the phrase ``may 
submit'' would be corrected to read ``must submit.''

[[Page 57786]]

II. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date

    We ordinarily publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the 
Federal Register to provide a period for public comment before the 
provisions of a rule take effect in accordance with section 553(b) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However, we 
can waive the notice and comment procedures if the Secretary finds, for 
good cause, that the notice and comment process is impracticable, 
unnecessary or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates a 
statement of the finding and the reasons therefore in the rule. We can 
also waive the 30-day delay in effective date under the APA (5 U.S.C. 
553(d)) when there is good cause to do so and we publish in the rule an 
explanation of our good cause.
    Our policy on reclassification of a campus of a multicampus 
hospital in the FY 2006 final rule has previously been subjected to 
notice and comment procedures. These corrections are consistent with 
the discussion of this policy in the FY2006 final rule and do not make 
substantive changes to this policy. This correcting amendment merely 
corrects technical errors in the regulations text of the FY 2006 final 
rule. As a result, this correcting amendment is intended to ensure that 
the FY 2006 final rule accurately reflects the policy adopted in the 
final rule. Therefore, we find that undertaking further notice and 
comment procedures to incorporate these corrections into the final rule 
is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest.
    For the same reasons, we are also waiving the 30-day delay in 
effective date for this correcting amendment. We believe that it is in 
the public interest to ensure that the FY 2006 final rule accurately 
states our policy on reclassification of a campus of a multicampus 
hospital. Thus delaying the effective date of these corrections would 
be contrary to the public interest. Therefore, we also find good cause 
to waive the 30-day delay in effective date.

III. Correction of Regulation Text Errors

    Given the errors summarized in section I of this correcting 
amendment, we are making the following correcting amendments to 42 CFR 
Part 412:

PART 412--PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL 
SERVICES

0
Section 412.230 is amended by revising paragraph (d)(2)(iii) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  412.230  Criteria for an individual hospital seeking 
redesignation to another rural area or an urban area.

* * * * *
    (d)
    (2) * * *
    (iii) For applications submitted for reclassifications effective in 
FYs 2006 through 2008, a campus of a multicampus hospital may seek 
reclassification only to a CBSA in which another campus(es) is located. 
If the campus is seeking reclassification to a CBSA in which another 
campus(es) is located, as part of its reclassification request, the 
requesting entity must submit the composite wage data for the entire 
multicampus hospital as its hospital-specific data.
* * * * *

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, 
Medicare--Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare--
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)

    Dated: September 29, 2005.
Ann C. Agnew,
Executive Secretary to the Department.
[FR Doc. 05-19924 Filed 9-30-05; 11:06 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.