International Conference on Harmonisation; Draft Guidance on E2B(R) Clinical Safety Data Management: Data Elements for Transmission of Individual Case Safety Reports; Availability, 57610-57611 [05-19655]
Download as PDF
57610
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 190 / Monday, October 3, 2005 / Notices
the Collection of Platelets, Pheresis.’’ In
addition, in recent years, many
improvements have been made in
automated blood cell separator
technology and blood cell counting
methods. Automated blood cell
separator devices are now capable of
various plateletpheresis collection
procedures including, but not limited
to, collection of double and triple
platelet components obtained during a
single procedure; use of in-process
leukocyte reduction; collection of
concurrent plasma components; and
collection of concurrent Red Blood Cell
components. When finalized, the draft
guidance will replace the October 1988
guideline.
The draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent FDA’s current thinking on this
topic. It does not create or confer any
rights for or on any person and does not
operate to bind FDA or the public. An
alternative approach may be used if
such approach satisfies the requirement
of the applicable statutes and
regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance contains information
collection provisions that are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
this guidance are under FDA’s
regulations at parts 211, 601, 606, 610,
and 640 (21 CFR parts 211, 601, 606,
610, and 640). Part 211, subpart J
(Records and Reports) was approved
under OMB control number 0910–0139;
part 606, subpart I (Records and
Reports) was approved under OMB
control numbers 0910–0116 and 0910–
0458. Sections 606.100(b) and (c),
606.110(a), 606.121, 606.122, 640.25,
and 640.27 were approved under OMB
control number 0910–0116; §§ 211.22,
211.80, 211.100(b), and 211.160 were
approved under OMB control number
0910–0139; § 610.2 was approved under
OMB control number 0910–0206; and
§§ 601.12 and 610.60 were approved
under OMB Control No. 0910–0338.
III. Comments
The draft guidance is being
distributed for comment purposes only
and is not intended for implementation
at this time. Interested persons may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments regarding the draft
guidance. Submit a single copy of
electronic comments or two paper
copies of any mailed comments, except
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:26 Sep 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
that individuals may submit one paper
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in the
brackets in the heading of this
document. A copy of the draft guidance
and received comments are available for
public examination in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the draft guidance at either
https://www.fda.gov/cber/guidelines.htm
or https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/
default.htm.
Dated: September 12, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–19727 Filed 9–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005D–0390]
International Conference on
Harmonisation; Draft Guidance on
E2B(R) Clinical Safety Data
Management: Data Elements for
Transmission of Individual Case Safety
Reports; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance entitled
‘‘E2B(R) Clinical Safety Data
Management: Data Elements for
Transmission of Individual Case Safety
Reports.’’ The draft guidance was
prepared under the auspices of the
International Conference on
Harmonisation of Technical
Requirements for Registration of
Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH).
The draft guidance, which revises
previous guidance on the same topic,
provides standardized data elements for
the transmission of individual case
safety reports for preapproval and
postapproval reporting periods. The
revisions in this draft guidance include
additional information and
clarifications for the electronic
transmission of individual case safety
reports. The draft guidance is intended
to be used with other ICH
recommendations for electronic
transmissions.
Submit written or electronic
comments on the draft guidance by
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
October 28, 2005. General comments on
agency guidance documents are
welcome at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on the draft guidance to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
Submit written requests for single
copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Drug Information (HFD–
240), Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857; or the Office of
Communication, Training and
Manufacturers Assistance (HFM–40),
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, MD 20852–1448. The draft
guidance may also be obtained by mail
by calling the Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER) Voice
Information System at 1–800–835–4709
or 301–827–1800. Send two selfaddressed adhesive labels to assist the
office in processing your requests. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the draft
guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regarding the guidance: Roger
Goetsch, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research (HFD–410), Food and
Drug Administration, 12300
Twinbrook Pkwy., Rockville, MD
20851, 301–770–9299, or Lise
Stevens-Hawkins, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(HFM–220), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, 301–
827–6085.
Regarding the ICH: Michelle Limoli,
Office of International Programs
(HFG–1), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–
4480.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In recent years, many important
initiatives have been undertaken by
regulatory authorities and industry
associations to promote international
harmonization of regulatory
requirements. FDA has participated in
many meetings designed to enhance
harmonization and is committed to
seeking scientifically based harmonized
technical procedures for pharmaceutical
development. One of the goals of
harmonization is to identify and then
reduce differences in technical
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 190 / Monday, October 3, 2005 / Notices
requirements for drug development
among regulatory agencies.
ICH was organized to provide an
opportunity for tripartite harmonization
initiatives to be developed with input
from both regulatory and industry
representatives. FDA also seeks input
from consumer representatives and
others. ICH is concerned with
harmonization of technical
requirements for the registration of
pharmaceutical products among three
regions: The European Union, Japan,
and the United States. The six ICH
sponsors are the European Commission;
the European Federation of
Pharmaceutical Industries Associations;
the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour,
and Welfare; the Japanese
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Association; the Centers for Drug
Evaluation and Research and Biologics
Evaluation and Research, FDA; and the
Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America. The ICH
Secretariat, which coordinates the
preparation of documentation, is
provided by the International
Federation of Pharmaceutical
Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA).
The ICH Steering Committee includes
representatives from each of the ICH
sponsors and the IFPMA, as well as
observers from the World Health
Organization, Health Canada, and the
European Free Trade Area.
The ICH guidance entitled ‘‘E2B Data
Elements for Transmission of Individual
Case Safety Reports’’ was signed off by
ICH in July 1997 and issued by FDA in
January 1998 (63 FR 2396, January 15,
1998). ICH subsequently issued a
revised guidance entitled ‘‘E2B(M)
Clinical Safety Data Management: Data
Elements for Transmission of Individual
Case Safety Reports’’ (E2B(M)), to
provide additional information and
clarification. ICH signed off on E2B(M)
in November 2001, and FDA issued the
revised guidance in April 2002.
In May 2005, the ICH Steering
Committee agreed that the E2B(M) draft
guidance should be made available for
public comment. The draft guidance is
the product of the E2B(R) Expert
Working Group of the ICH. Comments
about the draft guidance will be
considered by FDA and the E2B(R)
Expert Working Group.
FDA is announcing the availability of
the draft guidance entitled ‘‘E2B(R)
Clinical Safety Data Management: Data
Elements for Transmission of Individual
Case Safety Reports,’’ which revises the
previous E2B guidances to include
additional information and clarification
for the electronic transmission of
individual case safety reports. The draft
guidance incorporates adjustments
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:26 Sep 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
based on experience gained after
implementation of the guidance in the
three ICH regions and expands the use
of the standard data elements to support
vaccine reporting. For electronic
transmissions, the draft guidance is
intended to be used with the ICH M2
individual case safety report (ICSR)
message specification. The draft
guidance recommends that electronic
transmission of individual case safety
reports be implemented using the
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory
Activities (MedDRA) and ICH M5 data
elements and standards where
applicable.
FDA has identified in public Docket
No. 1992S–0251 (formerly Docket No.
92S–0251) postmarketing individual
case safety reports as submission types
that the agency can accept in electronic
format. FDA believes the ICH
recommendations for the electronic
transmission of these reports will result
in more effective and efficient safety
reporting to regulatory authorities
worldwide.
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the agency’s current thinking
on this topic. It does not create or confer
any rights for or on any person and does
not operate to bind FDA or the public.
An alternative approach may be used if
such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments on the draft guidance. Submit
a single copy of electronic comments or
two paper copies of any mailed
comments, except that individuals may
submit one paper copy. Comments are
to be identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. The draft guidance and
received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/
default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/cder/
guidance/index.htm, or https://
www.fda.gov/cber/publications.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57611
Dated: September 26, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–19655 Filed 9–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
Waiver of Compliance With Navigation
and Inspection Laws; Gulf Coast
States
Office of the Secretary, DHS.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The combined effect of Hurricanes
Rita and Katrina is one of the largest
natural disasters to ever strike the
United States. The hurricanes have
significantly disrupted production of oil
and gas in the Gulf of Mexico, have
caused many Gulf Coast oil refineries to
go out of service because of flooding,
lack of electric power or other reasons,
and have significantly disrupted the
pipeline transportation of oil and
refined products from the Gulf Coast
States. These production losses, outages,
and disruptions have caused increases
in the price of oil, gasoline and other
refined products. The Department of
Homeland Security has received reports
of threatened or actual shortages of
gasoline, jet fuel, and/or other refined
products as a result of the hurricanes.
Companies that produce and/or ship
petroleum and/or refined petroleum
products have submitted to the
Department requests for waivers of the
Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (the
‘‘Jones Act’’). See, 46 U.S.C. App.
section 1; 46 U.S.C. App. section 883.
This and related laws are generally
referred to as the ‘‘coastwise laws.’’
These laws provide, among other things,
that only vessels built and owned by
citizens of the United States and flagged
in the United States can carry
merchandise between U.S. ports.
The Secretary of Homeland Security
is vested with the authority and
discretion to waive the coastwise laws
‘‘to such extent and in such manner and
upon such terms as he may prescribe,
either upon his own initiative or upon
the written recommendation of the head
of any other Government agency,
whenever he deems that such action is
necessary in the interest of national
defense.’’ In consultation with and upon
the recommendation of the Secretary of
Energy, I have determined that such a
waiver, in accordance with the terms set
forth below, is in the interest of the
national defense.
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57610-57611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19655]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005D-0390]
International Conference on Harmonisation; Draft Guidance on
E2B(R) Clinical Safety Data Management: Data Elements for Transmission
of Individual Case Safety Reports; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance entitled ``E2B(R) Clinical Safety Data
Management: Data Elements for Transmission of Individual Case Safety
Reports.'' The draft guidance was prepared under the auspices of the
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for
Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). The draft
guidance, which revises previous guidance on the same topic, provides
standardized data elements for the transmission of individual case
safety reports for preapproval and postapproval reporting periods. The
revisions in this draft guidance include additional information and
clarifications for the electronic transmission of individual case
safety reports. The draft guidance is intended to be used with other
ICH recommendations for electronic transmissions.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the draft guidance by
October 28, 2005. General comments on agency guidance documents are
welcome at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the draft guidance to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic
comments to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. Submit written
requests for single copies of the draft guidance to the Division of
Drug Information (HFD-240), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857;
or the Office of Communication, Training and Manufacturers Assistance
(HFM-40), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-1448. The
draft guidance may also be obtained by mail by calling the Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Voice Information System at 1-
800-835-4709 or 301-827-1800. Send two self-addressed adhesive labels
to assist the office in processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft guidance
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regarding the guidance: Roger Goetsch, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research (HFD-410), Food and Drug Administration, 12300 Twinbrook
Pkwy., Rockville, MD 20851, 301-770-9299, or Lise Stevens-Hawkins,
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-220), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-827-6085.
Regarding the ICH: Michelle Limoli, Office of International
Programs (HFG-1), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4480.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In recent years, many important initiatives have been undertaken by
regulatory authorities and industry associations to promote
international harmonization of regulatory requirements. FDA has
participated in many meetings designed to enhance harmonization and is
committed to seeking scientifically based harmonized technical
procedures for pharmaceutical development. One of the goals of
harmonization is to identify and then reduce differences in technical
[[Page 57611]]
requirements for drug development among regulatory agencies.
ICH was organized to provide an opportunity for tripartite
harmonization initiatives to be developed with input from both
regulatory and industry representatives. FDA also seeks input from
consumer representatives and others. ICH is concerned with
harmonization of technical requirements for the registration of
pharmaceutical products among three regions: The European Union, Japan,
and the United States. The six ICH sponsors are the European
Commission; the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries
Associations; the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare; the
Japanese Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association; the Centers for Drug
Evaluation and Research and Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA; and
the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. The ICH
Secretariat, which coordinates the preparation of documentation, is
provided by the International Federation of Pharmaceutical
Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA).
The ICH Steering Committee includes representatives from each of
the ICH sponsors and the IFPMA, as well as observers from the World
Health Organization, Health Canada, and the European Free Trade Area.
The ICH guidance entitled ``E2B Data Elements for Transmission of
Individual Case Safety Reports'' was signed off by ICH in July 1997 and
issued by FDA in January 1998 (63 FR 2396, January 15, 1998). ICH
subsequently issued a revised guidance entitled ``E2B(M) Clinical
Safety Data Management: Data Elements for Transmission of Individual
Case Safety Reports'' (E2B(M)), to provide additional information and
clarification. ICH signed off on E2B(M) in November 2001, and FDA
issued the revised guidance in April 2002.
In May 2005, the ICH Steering Committee agreed that the E2B(M)
draft guidance should be made available for public comment. The draft
guidance is the product of the E2B(R) Expert Working Group of the ICH.
Comments about the draft guidance will be considered by FDA and the
E2B(R) Expert Working Group.
FDA is announcing the availability of the draft guidance entitled
``E2B(R) Clinical Safety Data Management: Data Elements for
Transmission of Individual Case Safety Reports,'' which revises the
previous E2B guidances to include additional information and
clarification for the electronic transmission of individual case safety
reports. The draft guidance incorporates adjustments based on
experience gained after implementation of the guidance in the three ICH
regions and expands the use of the standard data elements to support
vaccine reporting. For electronic transmissions, the draft guidance is
intended to be used with the ICH M2 individual case safety report
(ICSR) message specification. The draft guidance recommends that
electronic transmission of individual case safety reports be
implemented using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities
(MedDRA) and ICH M5 data elements and standards where applicable.
FDA has identified in public Docket No. 1992S-0251 (formerly Docket
No. 92S-0251) postmarketing individual case safety reports as
submission types that the agency can accept in electronic format. FDA
believes the ICH recommendations for the electronic transmission of
these reports will result in more effective and efficient safety
reporting to regulatory authorities worldwide.
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the agency's current thinking on this topic.
It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does
not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be
used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments on the draft guidance.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. The draft guidance and received
comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/cder/
guidance/index.htm, or https://www.fda.gov/cber/publications.htm.
Dated: September 26, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-19655 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S