Shipping; Technical, Organizational and Conforming Amendments, 57181-57183 [05-19723]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
57181
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Community
No.
State and location
Region V
Wisconsin:
Manitowoc,
Manitowoc County.
City
Effective date authorization/cancellation of
sale of flood insurance in community
Current effective
map date
Date certain federal assistance
no longer available in special
flood hazard
areas
of,
550240
May 21, 1971, Emerg; April 15, 1977, Reg;
September 30, 2005, Susp.
......do ...............
Do.
Region VII
Nebraska: Brule, Village of, Keith County.
Campbell, Village of, Franklin County. ..
310128
July 10, 1975, Emerg; September 27, 1985,
Reg; September 30, 2005, Susp.
January 6, 1998, Emerg; March 1, 2001,
Reg; September 30, 2005, Susp.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
Region VIII
Colorado: Castle Rock, Town of, Douglas County.
Larkspur, Town of, Douglas County ......
080050
April 22, 1975, Emerg; August 15, 1978,
Reg; September 30, 2005, Susp.
March 27, 1987, Emerg; September 30,
1987, Reg; September 30, 2005, Susp.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
February 10, 1994, Emerg; February 10,
1994, Reg; September 30, 2005, Susp.
September 15, 1972, Emerg; May 1, 1980,
Reg; September 30, 2005, Susp.
October 30, 1975, Emerg; December 1,
1982, Reg; September 30, 2005, Susp.
August 21, 1975, Emerg; April 30, 1982,
Reg; September 30, 2005, Susp..
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
......do ...............
Do.
310256
080309
Region IX
Arizona: Fountain Hills, Town of, Maricopa County.
Paradise Valley, Town of, Maricopa
County.
California: Fresno, City of, Santa Barbara County.
Guadalupe, City of, Santa Barbara
County.
040135
040049
060048
060333
*......do....=Ditto.
Code for reading third column: Emerg.-Emergency; Reg.-Regular; Susp.-Suspension.
Dated: September 21, 2005.
David I. Maurstad,
Acting Mitigation Division Director,
Emergency Preparedness and Response
Directorate.
[FR Doc. 05–19637 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
Documents as indicated in
this preamble are available for
inspection or copying under docket
number [USCG–2005–22329] at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, room PL–
401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. You may also find this
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call Mr.
Ray Davis, Project Manager, Standards
Evaluation and Development Division
(G–MSR–1), U.S. Coast Guard, at 202–
267–6826. If you have questions on
viewing, or submitting material to the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations,
Department of Transportation, at 202–
493–0402.
ACTION:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 3, 10, 114, 147, 151, and
175
[USCG–2005–22329]
RIN 1625–ZA05
Shipping; Technical, Organizational
and Conforming Amendments
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
SUMMARY: This rule makes nonsubstantive changes throughout Title 46
of the Code of Federal Regulations. The
purpose of this rule is to make
conforming amendments and technical
corrections to Coast Guard shipping and
transportation regulations. This rule
will have no substantive effect on the
regulated public.
DATES: This final rule is effective
September 30, 2005.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:40 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
ADDRESSES:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under both 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(A) and (b)(B), the Coast Guard
finds that this rule is exempt from
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements because some of these
changes involve agency organization
and practices, and all of these changes
are non-substantive. This rule consists
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
only of corrections and editorial,
organizational, and conforming
amendments. These changes will have
no substantive effect on the public;
therefore, it is unnecessary to publish an
NPRM. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that, for the same
reasons, good cause exists for making
this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Discussion of the Rule
Each year Title 46 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is updated on
October 1. This rule, which becomes
effective on September 30, 2005, makes
technical and editorial corrections
throughout Title 46. This rule does not
change any substantive requirements of
the existing regulations.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. We expect the economic impact
of this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
As this rule involves internal agency
practices and procedures and nonsubstantive changes, it will not impose
any costs on the public.
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
57182
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Small Entities
Civil Justice Reform
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000. This
rule does not require a general NPRM
and, therefore, is exempt from the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. Although this rule is
exempt, we have reviewed it for
potential economic impact on small
entities.
This rule will have no substantive
effect on the regulated public.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraphs (34)(a) and (b), of
the Instruction from further
environmental documentation because
this rule involves editorial, procedural,
and internal agency functions. An
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects
46 CFR Part 3
Oceanographic research vessels,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Research.
46 CFR Part 10
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Schools, Seamen.
46 CFR Part 114
Marine safety, Passenger vessels,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
46 CFR Part 147
Hazardous materials transportation,
Labeling, Marine safety, Packaging and
containers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
46 CFR Part 151
Cargo vessels, Hazardous materials
transportation, Marine safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Water
pollution control.
46 CFR Part 175
Marine safety, Passenger vessels,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 46
CFR parts 3, 10, 114, 147, 151 and 175
as follows:
PART 3—DESIGNATION OF
OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH
VESSELS
1. The authority citation for part 3
continues to read as follows:
I
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2113, 3306;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
§ 3.03–1
[Amended]
I 2. In § 3.03–1, remove the words ‘‘in
this subchapter’’ and add, in their place,
the words ‘‘in this part’’.
PART 10—LICENSING OF MARITIME
PERSONNEL
3. The authority citation for part 10
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 633; 31 U.S.C. 9701;
46 U.S.C. 2101, 2103, and 2110; 46 U.S.C.
chapter 71; 46 U.S.C. 7502, 7505, 7701, and
8906; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation 0170.1. Section 10.107 is also
issued under the authority of 44 U.S.C. 3507.
4. In § 10.201(c), remove the text
‘‘§ 10.464(i)’’ and add, in its place, the
text ‘‘10.467(h)’’.
[Amended]
5. In § 10.467(b), after the words
‘‘under paragraph’’, remove the text
‘‘(f)’’ and add, in its place, the text ‘‘(g)’’.
I
PART 114—GENERAL PROVISIONS
[Amended]
7. In § 114.400(b) in the definition for
‘‘High speed craft’’, after the text
‘‘V=3.7xdispl .1667’’, remove the text ‘‘h’’.
I
PART 147—HAZARDOUS SHIPS’
STORES
8 . The authority citation for part 147
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306; E.O. 12234, 45
FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
[Amended]
9. In § 147.30(b), after the words
‘‘Federal Hazardous Substances Act
Regulations in’’, remove the text ‘‘26
CFR’’ and add, in its place, the text ‘‘16
CFR’’.
I
PART 151—BARGES CARRYING BULK
LIQUID HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
CARGOES
10. The authority citation for part 151
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1903; 46 U.S.C. 3703;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
§ 175.400
[Amended]
13. In § 175.400 in the definition for
‘‘High speed craft’’, after the text
‘‘V=3.7xdispl .1667’’, remove the text ‘‘h’’.
I
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[WT Docket No. 97–82; FCC 04–295]
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3306, 3703;
Pub. L. 103–206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C.
App. 1804; Department of Homeland
Security No. 0170.1; Sec. 114.900 also issued
under 44 U.S.C. 3507.
§ 147.30
12. The authority citation for part 175
continues to read as follows:
I
47 CFR Part 1
6. The authority citation for part 114
continues to read as follows:
I
§ 114.400
PART 175—GENERAL PROVISIONS
Dated: September 15, 2005.
Stefan G. Venckus,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, United States Coast
Guard.
[FR Doc. 05–19723 Filed 9–28–05; 1:31 pm]
[Amended]
I
§ 10.467
[Amended]
11. In § 151.15–10(b), remove the text
‘‘151.03–43’’ and add, in its place,
‘‘151.03–49’’
I
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3205, 3306,
3703; Pub. L 103–206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49
U.S.C. App. 1804; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 175.900 also
issued under authority of 44 U.S.C. 3507.
I
§ 10.201
§ 151.15–10
Competitive Bidding Procedures
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In the Second Order on
Reconsideration of the Fifth Report and
Order the Commission grants two
petitions for reconsideration filed in
response to the Commission’s Part 1
Order on Reconsideration of the Fifth
Report and Order, 68 FR 42984 (July 21,
2003) (Part 1 Reconsideration Order).
The Commission revises one element of
the exemption from part 1 attribution
rules for certain rural telephone
cooperatives that participate in the
Commission’s spectrum auction
program. The revised rule permits a
rural telephone cooperative applicant or
its controlling interest to demonstrate
that either it is eligible for tax-exempt
status under the Internal Revenue Code
or it adheres to the cooperative
principles enumerated in a previous
decision of the United States Tax Court.
DATES: Effective December 9, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Huber, Auctions and Spectrum
Access Division, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418–
0660.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Second Order on
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57183
Reconsideration of the Fifth Report and
Order adopted December 22, 2004 and
released on January 31, 2005. The
complete text of the Second Order on
Reconsideration of the Fifth Report and
Order, is available for public inspection
and copying during regular business
hours at the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
The Second Order on Reconsideration
of the Fifth Report and Order and
related Commission documents may
also be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI),
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room
CY–B402, Washington, DC, 20554,
telephone 202–488–5300, facsimile
202–488–5563, or you may contact BCPI
at its Web site: https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. When ordering
documents from BCPI, please make sure
you provide the appropriate FCC
document number (for example, FCC
04–295 for the Second Order on
Reconsideration of the Fifth Report and
Order) and related documents are also
available on the Internet at the
Commission’s Web site: https://
wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/.
I. Overview
1. In the Second Order on
Reconsideration of the Part 1 Fifth
Report and Order, the Commission
grants two petitions for reconsideration
of the Commission’s Part 1
Reconsideration Order. The petitioners
seek to modify one of the elements of
the three-part test that rural telephone
cooperatives must satisfy to receive a
limited exemption from the attribution
rules that are part of the Commission’s
part 1 competitive bidding rules. In
particular, petitioners seek to refine a
portion of the rule that defines the
category of eligible rural telephone
cooperatives so as not to limit the
flexibility of rural telephone
cooperatives to provide new
telecommunications and other advanced
communications services to consumers
in rural areas. In this decision, the
Commission revises the third element of
the exemption to permit a rural
telephone cooperative applicant (or its
controlling interest) to demonstrate that
either it is eligible for tax-exempt status
pursuant to section 501(c)(12) of the
Internal Revenue Code or it adheres to
the cooperative principles enumerated
in Puget Sound Plywood, Inc. v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(Puget Sound), 44 T.C. 305 (1965). The
Commission also clarifies how the first
element of this rule applies in cases
where a rural telephone cooperative
applicant is organized in a jurisdiction
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57181-57183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19723]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 3, 10, 114, 147, 151, and 175
[USCG-2005-22329]
RIN 1625-ZA05
Shipping; Technical, Organizational and Conforming Amendments
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule makes non-substantive changes throughout Title 46 of
the Code of Federal Regulations. The purpose of this rule is to make
conforming amendments and technical corrections to Coast Guard shipping
and transportation regulations. This rule will have no substantive
effect on the regulated public.
DATES: This final rule is effective September 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents as indicated in this preamble are available for
inspection or copying under docket number [USCG-2005-22329] at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, room PL-
401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find
this docket on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call Mr. Ray Davis, Project Manager, Standards Evaluation and
Development Division (G-MSR-1), U.S. Coast Guard, at 202-267-6826. If
you have questions on viewing, or submitting material to the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, Department of
Transportation, at 202-493-0402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under both 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A) and (b)(B), the Coast Guard
finds that this rule is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking
requirements because some of these changes involve agency organization
and practices, and all of these changes are non-substantive. This rule
consists only of corrections and editorial, organizational, and
conforming amendments. These changes will have no substantive effect on
the public; therefore, it is unnecessary to publish an NPRM. Under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that, for the same reasons,
good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register.
Discussion of the Rule
Each year Title 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations is updated on
October 1. This rule, which becomes effective on September 30, 2005,
makes technical and editorial corrections throughout Title 46. This
rule does not change any substantive requirements of the existing
regulations.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. We expect the economic impact of this
rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
As this rule involves internal agency practices and procedures and non-
substantive changes, it will not impose any costs on the public.
[[Page 57182]]
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
This rule does not require a general NPRM and, therefore, is exempt
from the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Although this
rule is exempt, we have reviewed it for potential economic impact on
small entities.
This rule will have no substantive effect on the regulated public.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraphs (34)(a) and (b), of the Instruction from further
environmental documentation because this rule involves editorial,
procedural, and internal agency functions. An ``Environmental Analysis
Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects
46 CFR Part 3
Oceanographic research vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Research.
46 CFR Part 10
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Schools, Seamen.
46 CFR Part 114
Marine safety, Passenger vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
46 CFR Part 147
Hazardous materials transportation, Labeling, Marine safety,
Packaging and containers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
46 CFR Part 151
Cargo vessels, Hazardous materials transportation, Marine safety,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution control.
46 CFR Part 175
Marine safety, Passenger vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 46
CFR parts 3, 10, 114, 147, 151 and 175 as follows:
PART 3--DESIGNATION OF OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH VESSELS
0
1. The authority citation for part 3 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 57183]]
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2113, 3306; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 3.03-1 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 3.03-1, remove the words ``in this subchapter'' and add, in
their place, the words ``in this part''.
PART 10--LICENSING OF MARITIME PERSONNEL
0
3. The authority citation for part 10 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 633; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 46 U.S.C. 2101, 2103,
and 2110; 46 U.S.C. chapter 71; 46 U.S.C. 7502, 7505, 7701, and
8906; Department of Homeland Security Delegation 0170.1. Section
10.107 is also issued under the authority of 44 U.S.C. 3507.
Sec. 10.201 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 10.201(c), remove the text ``Sec. 10.464(i)'' and add, in
its place, the text ``10.467(h)''.
Sec. 10.467 [Amended]
0
5. In Sec. 10.467(b), after the words ``under paragraph'', remove the
text ``(f)'' and add, in its place, the text ``(g)''.
PART 114--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
6. The authority citation for part 114 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103-206, 107
Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. App. 1804; Department of Homeland Security No.
0170.1; Sec. 114.900 also issued under 44 U.S.C. 3507.
Sec. 114.400 [Amended]
0
7. In Sec. 114.400(b) in the definition for ``High speed craft'',
after the text ``V=3.7xdispl .1667'', remove the text ``h''.
PART 147--HAZARDOUS SHIPS' STORES
0
8 . The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980
Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
Sec. 147.30 [Amended]
0
9. In Sec. 147.30(b), after the words ``Federal Hazardous Substances
Act Regulations in'', remove the text ``26 CFR'' and add, in its place,
the text ``16 CFR''.
PART 151--BARGES CARRYING BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS MATERIAL CARGOES
0
10. The authority citation for part 151 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1903; 46 U.S.C. 3703; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 151.15-10 [Amended]
0
11. In Sec. 151.15-10(b), remove the text ``151.03-43'' and add, in
its place, ``151.03-49''
PART 175--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
12. The authority citation for part 175 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3205, 3306, 3703; Pub. L 103-206, 107
Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. App. 1804; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 175.900 also issued under authority of 44
U.S.C. 3507.
Sec. 175.400 [Amended]
0
13. In Sec. 175.400 in the definition for ``High speed craft'', after
the text ``V=3.7xdispl .1667'', remove the text ``h''.
Dated: September 15, 2005.
Stefan G. Venckus,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, United States
Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 05-19723 Filed 9-28-05; 1:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
