National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List, 57155-57158 [05-19613]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
J. How Does Today’s Action Affect
Indian Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Montana?
Montana is not authorized to carry out
its hazardous waste program in Indian
country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.
This includes, but is not limited to:
A. Lands within the exterior
boundaries of the following Indian
Reservations located within or abutting
the State of Montana:
a. Blackfeet Indian Reservation.
b. Crow Tribe of Montana Indian
Reservation.
c. Flathead Indian Reservation.
d. Fort Belknap Indian Reservation.
e. Fort Peck Indian Reservation.
f. Northern Cheyenne Indian
Reservation.
g. Rocky Boy’s Indian Reservation.
B. Any land held in trust by the U.S.
for an Indian tribe, and
C. Any other land, whether on or off
a reservation that qualifies as Indian
country within the meaning of 18 U.S.C.
1151.
Therefore, this program revision does
not extend to Indian country where EPA
will continue to implement and
administer the RCRA program in these
lands.
K. What is Codification and is EPA
Codifying Montana’s Hazardous Waste
Program as Authorized in This Rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s authorized hazardous waste
program statutes and regulations into
the Code of Federal Regulations. We do
this by referencing the authorized State
rules in 40 CFR part 272. We reserve the
amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart
BB for this authorization of Montana’s
program until a later date.
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget
has exempted this action from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and
therefore this action is not subject to
review by OMB. This action authorizes
State requirements for the purpose of
RCRA 3006 and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. Accordingly, I certify that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this action authorizes
pre-existing requirements under State
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by State law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). For
the same reason, this action also does
not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely authorizes State requirements as
part of the State RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA section 3006(b), EPA
grants a State’s application for
authorization as long as the State meets
the criteria required by RCRA. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law
for EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary
steps to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR
8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in
accordance with the ‘‘Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’ issued under the
executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57155
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective November 29,
2005.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Incorporation-byreference, Indians-lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006 and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: September 22, 2005.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 05–19619 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL–7977–6]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct Final Deletion of the
Batavia Landfill Superfund Site from
the National Priorities List.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 2, announces the
deletion of the Batavia Landfill
Superfund Site (Site), located in the
Town of Batavia, Genesee County, New
York, from the National Priorities List
(NPL) and will consider public
comment on this action.
The NPL is Appendix B of the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances
Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 40
CFR part 300, which EPA promulgated
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
57156
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
pursuant to section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended.
This Direct Final Notice of Deletion is
being published by EPA with the
concurrence of the State of New York,
through the Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC).
EPA and NYSDEC have determined that
potentially responsible parties have
implemented all appropriate response
actions required. Moreover, EPA and
NYSDEC have determined that the Site
poses no significant threat to public
health or the environment.
DATES: This direct final deletion will be
effective November 29, 2005 unless EPA
receives significant adverse comments
by October 31, 2005. If significant
adverse comments are received, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final deletion in the Federal
Register, informing the public that the
deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed
to: Michael Walters, Remedial Project
Manager, Emergency and Remedial
Response Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2, 290
Broadway, 20th Floor, New York, New
York 10007–1866.
Information Repositories:
Comprehensive information about the
Site is available for viewing and copying
at the Site information repositories
located at: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2, Superfund
Records Center, 290 Broadway, Room
1828, New York, New York 10007–1866,
(212) 637–4308,
Hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday;
Batavia Town Hall, 3833 West Main
Street Road, Batavia, New York
14020, Telephone Number (585) 343–
1729, Hours: 9 a.m. to 8 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Richmond Public Library, 19 Ross
Street, Batavia, New York 14020,
Mon., Tues., Thurs. 9 a.m. to 9 p.m.,
Wed. 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Fri. 9 a.m. to
5 p.m. Closed on Saturday and
Sunday, Telephone (585) 343–9550.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Walters, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. EPA Region 2, 290
Broadway, 20th Floor, New York, New
York 10007–1866, (212) 637–4279; Fax
Number (212) 637–4284; E-mail address:
Walters.Michael@EPA.GOV.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
I. Introduction
EPA Region 2 announces the deletion
of the Batavia Landfill Superfund Site
from the NPL. The EPA maintains the
NPL as the list of those sites that appear
to present a significant risk to public
health, welfare, or the environment. As
described in 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP,
sites deleted from the NPL remain
eligible for remedial actions if
conditions at the deleted site warrant
such action.
EPA considers this action to be
noncontroversial and routine, and
therefore, EPA is taking it without prior
publication of a Notice of Intent to
Delete. This action will be effective
November 29, 2005 unless EPA receives
significant adverse comments by
October 31, 2005 on this action or the
parallel Notice of Intent to Delete
published in the Notice section of
today’s Federal Register. If significant
adverse comments are received within
the 30-day public comment period, EPA
Region 2 will publish a timely
withdrawal of this Direct Final Deletion
before the effective date of the deletion
and the deletion will not take effect.
EPA will, if appropriate, prepare a
response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of
the Notice of Intent to Delete and the
comments already received. There will
be no additional opportunity to
comment.
Section II explains the criteria for
deleting sites from the NPL. Section III
discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV discusses the
Batavia Landfill Superfund Site and
demonstrates how it meets the deletion
criteria.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP
provides that sites may be deleted from
the NPL where no further response is
appropriate. In making this
determination, EPA, in consultation
with the State, shall consider whether
any of the following criteria have been
met:
i. Responsible parties or other parties
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed
responses under CERCLA have been
implemented, and no further action by
responsible parties is appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore,
implementing remedial measures is not
appropriate.
Even if a site is deleted from the NPL,
where hazardous substances, pollutants,
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or contaminants remain at the deleted
site above levels that allow for
unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure, CERCLA section 121(c), 42
U.S.C. 9261(c) requires that a
subsequent review of the site be
conducted at least every five years after
initiation of the remedial action at the
deleted site to ensure that the action
remains protective of human health and
the environment. If new information
becomes available which indicates a
need for further action, EPA may initiate
remedial actions. Based upon Section
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, whenever
there is a significant release from a site
deleted from the NPL, the deleted site
may be restored to the NPL without
application of the hazard ranking
system. EPA proposes to delete this Site
because potentially responsible parties
have implemented all appropriate
response actions.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures were used
for the intended deletion of this Site:
(1) The Site was listed on the NPL in
September 1983.
(2) In August 1984, EPA entered into
an Administrative Order on Consent
with NL Industries for the performance
of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Study (RI/FS) for the Site.
(3) The RI Report was completed in
1992, the FS Report in 1994.
(4) On March 31, 1993, EPA signed a
Record of Decision (ROD) selecting an
interim remedy for the Site which
required the extension of the municipal
water supply system to residents
affected or potentially affected by the
Site.
(5) On September 21, 1993, EPA
issued a Unilateral Administrative
Order to the Potentially Responsible
Parties (PRPs) directing them to
implement the interim remedy.
(6) On January 30, 1996, EPA formally
approved the completion of the
extension of the municipal waterline
system and connection of the homes.
(7) On June 6, 1995, EPA issued a
ROD which selected a final remedy for
the Site which included engineered and
institutional controls.
(8) The first Five-Year Review was
signed by EPA on June 30, 2000.
(9) On July 10, 2003, EPA determined
that the engineered controls had been
constructed. A final Remedial Action
Report was approved on September 26,
2003.
(10) In June 2005, institutional
controls were recorded with the
Genesee County Register of Deeds.
(11) The EPA consulted with the
NYSDEC on the deletion of this Site and
NYSDEC concurred with the deletion of
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
the Site from the NPL on September 13,
2005.
(12) Concurrently with the
publication of this Direct Final Deletion,
a parallel Notice of Intent to Delete has
been published today in the Notice
section of the Federal Register. Notices
are also being published in local
newspapers and appropriate notice is
being provided to federal, state, and
local government officials and other
interested parties.
(13) The EPA placed copies of
documents supporting the deletion in
the Site information repositories
identified above.
If no significant adverse comments are
received, the Site will be deleted. If
significant adverse comments are
received within the 30-day public
comment period on this action, EPA
will publish a timely notice of
withdrawal of this deletion before its
effective date. EPA will prepare, if
appropriate, a response to comments
and continue with the deletion process
on the basis of the Notice of Intent to
Delete and the comments already
received.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does
not itself create, alter, or revoke any
individual’s rights or obligations.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not
in any way alter EPA’s right to take
appropriate enforcement actions.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following summary provides a
brief description and actions taken at
the Batavia Landfill Superfund Site
which provides the Agency’s rationale
for recommending deletion of the Site
from the NPL.
The Batavia Landfill Superfund Site
(the Site or the Landfill) is located in the
Town of Batavia, Genesee County,
approximately three miles westnorthwest of the City of Batavia, New
York. The Site is approximately 35 acres
in area and is bounded to the north and
portions of the east by the Galloway
Swamp, to the east by the Town’s
former Sanitary Landfill (now closed),
to the south by Harloff Road (the New
York State Thruway is approximately
200 feet south of the Landfill), and to
the west by vacant property. The Town
of Batavia owns the Site and the
adjoining sanitary landfill to the east.
The Landfill accepted wastes,
including industrial wastes, for on-site
disposal from 1968 until 1980, when the
NYSDEC declared the property an open
dump based on noncompliance with
surface water criteria (40 CFR Part 257).
Poor housekeeping practices and the
disposal of industrial and hazardous
wastes resulted in the closure of the
Landfill.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
During the active years of waste
management approximately 800,000
cubic yards of industrial wastes have
been disposited at the Site. In December
1982, Fred C. Hart Associates, under
contract with EPA, conducted a
groundwater sampling survey in the
area of the Site. Sampling data from onsite monitoring wells revealed the
presence of hazardous organic and
inorganic chemical constituents
(including methylene chloride, 1,1
dichloroethane, and barium) which
exceeded New York State and Federal
drinking water standards.
On December 20, 1982, the Site was
proposed for inclusion on the NPL and
was added to the NPL by publication in
the Federal Register on September 8,
1983 (48 FR 40658).
On August 9, 1984, EPA entered into
an Administrative Order on Consent
(AOC) with NL Industries, a Potentially
Responsible Party (PRP), for the
performance of a RI/FS at the Site.
A residential well program conducted
by the New York State Department of
Health in 1992 at homes in close
proximity to the Site revealed levels of
contaminants in the wells above the
Federal Maximum Contaminant Levels.
A subsequent risk assessment performed
by EPA revealed that the continued
ingestion of the groundwater posed a
significant endangerment to the area
residents.
On March 31, 1993, EPA signed a
Record of Decision (ROD) selecting an
interim remedy for the Site which
required the extension of the municipal
water supply system to residents
affected or potentially affected by the
Site.
On September 21, 1993, EPA issued a
Unilateral Administrative Order to the
PRPs directing them to implement the
interim remedy outlined in the 1993
ROD. On January 30, 1996, EPA
approved the completion of the
replacement and/or retrofitting of
residential groundwater well piping
systems with new piping and
appurtenances connecting each home to
the waterline.
On June 6, 1995, EPA selected the
final remedy: (a) The excavation of
approximately 50,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil from the northern
area of the Landfill and consolidation of
these materials under a landfill cap in
the southern area of the Landfill; (b)
excavation of approximately 150 drums
from the southern area of the Landfill
and their off-site treatment and disposal;
(c) construction of a cap over the
southern region of the Landfill; (d) the
restoration of the surrounding wetlands
at the Landfill impacted by past waste
disposal activities; and, (e)
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57157
establishment of institutional controls to
preclude certain uses of the property.
In September 1995, EPA issued an
AOC for the performance of the
remedial design (RD) for the site
remedy. The RD was completed in
December 1999. The site remedy was
modified on September 16, 1999 in an
Explanation of Significant Difference
(ESD) which called for the excavation
and removal of 126,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soils from the northern
and central areas of the Site, an increase
of 76,000 cubic yards of wastes from the
previous estimate.
The final landfill cap, constructed in
the southern area of the Site, covers an
approximate area of 15.5 acres and is
consistent with New York State
hazardous waste management
regulations. Approximately 210,000
cubic yards of excavated wastes from
the northern, central and wetland areas
of the Site were consolidated under the
southern area landfill cap. The landfill
cap was constructed with 18 inches of
compacted clay, a drainage and leachate
collection system, a gas venting system
and a 24-inch barrier protection layer of
soil and 6 inches of topsoil suitable to
maintain vegetative growth.
A perimeter chain-linked fence
around the Site, including three access
gates, has been installed. Approximately
seven acres of waste-impacted wetlands
(including some areas of standing water
which support a submergent vegetative
community) were remediated and
restored during the conclusion of
remedial construction activities in
September and October 2002.
Institutional controls have been put in
place at the Site to restrict future
activities at the Site that may negatively
impact the effectiveness of the
implemented site remedy or threaten
human health and the environment.
These site restrictions include a ban on
the construction of drinking water wells
and new building structures that may
impede the effectiveness of the landfill
cap systems.
Implementation of the interim and
final remedies have utilized permanent
solutions in the effective short-term and
long-term abatement of the human
health and ecological risks posed by the
Site. The final remedy is reducing the
toxicity, mobility, and volume of
contaminants by reducing infiltration
through the landfilled wastes and
collecting and treating the leachate. In
addition, the final remedy also involved
the remediation and restoration of seven
acres of wetlands at the Site.
EPA has determined that all
appropriate response measures under
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
57158
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Act have been implemented and that no
further cleanup is required. The Site
poses no significant threat to public
health or the environment.
Consequently, this Site no longer needs
to be listed on the NPL; however, this
decision does not preclude future
actions under Superfund should they
become necessary.
A Remedial Action Work Plan
(RAWP) for the implementation of longterm operation and maintenance for the
landfill cap systems is in place. The
Town of Batavia is required to manage
the required operation and maintenance
(O&M) activities in accordance with the
RAWP. Required O&M activities include
the long-term implementation of a semiannual groundwater monitoring
program, periodic Site inspections, and
regular landfill cap maintenance
activities. The inspections are required
to ensure and maintain the operational
effectiveness and structural integrity of
the Site remedy to protect human health
and the environment.
Institutional controls consisting of an
easement and deed restriction limiting
access to the Site and preventing the use
of contaminated water as a drinking
source were filed with the Genesee
County Register of Deeds on June 10,
2005.
Public participation activities for this
Site have been satisfied as required by
CERCLA Section 113(k), 42 U.S.C.
9613(k), and, CERCLA Section 117,42
U.S.C. 9617. The RI/FS and the 1993
and 1995 RODs were both subject to the
public review process. All documents
and information which EPA relied on or
considered in reaching the conclusion
that this Site can be deleted from the
NPL are available for the public to
review at the information repositories.
The final remedy implemented at this
Site results in contaminants remaining
at the Site above levels that allow for
unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure. In accordance with CERCLA
Section 121(c), EPA and/or NYSDEC
will conduct a review of this remedy no
less often than every five years. A first
Five-Year Review Report for the Site
was completed in June 2000. EPA has
determined that the remedies protect
public health and the environment and
that they function as intended by the
decision documents. All construction
activities for the Site required by the
final ROD were completed in July 2003.
A second Five-Year Review was
completed in September 2005.
One of the three criteria for site
deletion specifies that a site may be
deleted from the NPL if ‘‘responsible
parties or others parties have
implemented all appropriate response
actions required.’’ [ 40 CFR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
300.425(e)(1) (i)]. EPA, with
concurrence of the State of New York,
through the NYSDEC, believes that this
criterion for deletion has been met and
therefore, EPA is deleting this Site from
the NPL.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
waste, Hazardous substances,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: September 21, 2005.
Alan J. Steinberg,
Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region II.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble Part 300 Title 40 of Chapter I
of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
I
PART 300—[AMENDED]
The authority citation for Part 300
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O.12580, 52 FR 2923,
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B—[Amended]
I 2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300
is amended under New York (NY) by
removing the site name ‘‘Batavia
Landfill’’ and the corresponding city
designation ‘‘Town of Batavia.’’
[FR Doc. 05–19613 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL–7976–8]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance
Pollution Contingency Plan; National
Priorities List
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final notice of partial
deletion of the Jacobs Smelter
Superfund Site from the National
Priorities List.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 8 is publishing a
direct final notice of partial deletion of
the Jacobs Smelter Superfund Site from
the National Priorities List (NPL).
Specifically EPA intends to delete
Operable Unit 3 from the site,
comprised only of soils within the
Union Pacific Rail Road (UPRR) right-ofway in Tooele County, Utah.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The NPL, promulgated pursuant to
section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which
is the National Oil and Hazardous
Substance Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP). The EPA is publishing this direct
final notice of partial deletion with the
concurrence of the State of Utah,
through the Utah Department of
Environmental Quality (UDEQ) because
the EPA has determined that all
appropriate response actions under
CERCLA have been completed at these
properties and, therefore, further
remedial action pursuant to CERCLA is
not appropriate.
This partial deletion pertains to
Operable Unit 3 described in section IV
of this document and does not alter the
status of any other portion of the Jacobs
Smelter Superfund Site. Operable Unit
1 was deleted from the NPL in 2001.
DATES: This direct final partial deletion
will be effective November 29, 2005
unless EPA receives adverse comments
by October 31, 2005. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final partial deletion in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the partial deletion will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
Jennifer Lane, Community Involvement
Coordinator, U.S. EPA Region 8 (8OC),
999 18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, CO
80202–2466, (303) 312–6813.
Information Repositories:
Comprehensive information about the
site is available for viewing and copying
at the site information repositories
located at:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 8 Records Center, 999 18th St.,
Suite 300, Denver, CO 80202–2466,
Hours: Monday–Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m.
Tooele City Public Library, 128 West
Vine Street, Tooele, UT 84074, Hours:
Tuesday–Friday 11 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.;
Saturday 10:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Utah Department of Environmental
Quality, 168 North 1950 West, 1st
Floor, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801)
536–4400, Hours: Monday–Friday, 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Lloyd, Remedial Project Manager
(8EPR–SR), U.S. EPA Region 8, 999 18th
Street, Suite 300, Denver, CO 80202–
2466, (303) 312–6537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57155-57158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19613]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL-7977-6]
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct Final Deletion of the Batavia Landfill Superfund Site
from the National Priorities List.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 2, announces
the deletion of the Batavia Landfill Superfund Site (Site), located in
the Town of Batavia, Genesee County, New York, from the National
Priorities List (NPL) and will consider public comment on this action.
The NPL is Appendix B of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances
Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR part 300, which EPA
promulgated
[[Page 57156]]
pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. This
Direct Final Notice of Deletion is being published by EPA with the
concurrence of the State of New York, through the Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). EPA and NYSDEC have determined
that potentially responsible parties have implemented all appropriate
response actions required. Moreover, EPA and NYSDEC have determined
that the Site poses no significant threat to public health or the
environment.
DATES: This direct final deletion will be effective November 29, 2005
unless EPA receives significant adverse comments by October 31, 2005.
If significant adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of this direct final deletion in the Federal Register,
informing the public that the deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Michael Walters, Remedial Project
Manager, Emergency and Remedial Response Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 20th Floor, New York, New
York 10007-1866.
Information Repositories: Comprehensive information about the Site
is available for viewing and copying at the Site information
repositories located at: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
2, Superfund Records Center, 290 Broadway, Room 1828, New York, New
York 10007-1866, (212) 637-4308,
Hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday;
Batavia Town Hall, 3833 West Main Street Road, Batavia, New York 14020,
Telephone Number (585) 343-1729, Hours: 9 a.m. to 8 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Richmond Public Library, 19 Ross Street, Batavia, New York 14020, Mon.,
Tues., Thurs. 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., Wed. 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Fri. 9 a.m. to 5
p.m. Closed on Saturday and Sunday, Telephone (585) 343-9550.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Walters, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. EPA Region 2, 290 Broadway, 20th Floor, New York, New
York 10007-1866, (212) 637-4279; Fax Number (212) 637-4284; E-mail
address: Walters.Michael@EPA.GOV.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
I. Introduction
EPA Region 2 announces the deletion of the Batavia Landfill
Superfund Site from the NPL. The EPA maintains the NPL as the list of
those sites that appear to present a significant risk to public health,
welfare, or the environment. As described in 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP,
sites deleted from the NPL remain eligible for remedial actions if
conditions at the deleted site warrant such action.
EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and routine, and
therefore, EPA is taking it without prior publication of a Notice of
Intent to Delete. This action will be effective November 29, 2005
unless EPA receives significant adverse comments by October 31, 2005 on
this action or the parallel Notice of Intent to Delete published in the
Notice section of today's Federal Register. If significant adverse
comments are received within the 30-day public comment period, EPA
Region 2 will publish a timely withdrawal of this Direct Final Deletion
before the effective date of the deletion and the deletion will not
take effect. EPA will, if appropriate, prepare a response to comments
and continue with the deletion process on the basis of the Notice of
Intent to Delete and the comments already received. There will be no
additional opportunity to comment.
Section II explains the criteria for deleting sites from the NPL.
Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using for this action.
Section IV discusses the Batavia Landfill Superfund Site and
demonstrates how it meets the deletion criteria.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP provides that sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making this
determination, EPA, in consultation with the State, shall consider
whether any of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other parties have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed responses under CERCLA have been
implemented, and no further action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
implementing remedial measures is not appropriate.
Even if a site is deleted from the NPL, where hazardous substances,
pollutants, or contaminants remain at the deleted site above levels
that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, CERCLA section
121(c), 42 U.S.C. 9261(c) requires that a subsequent review of the site
be conducted at least every five years after initiation of the remedial
action at the deleted site to ensure that the action remains protective
of human health and the environment. If new information becomes
available which indicates a need for further action, EPA may initiate
remedial actions. Based upon Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, whenever
there is a significant release from a site deleted from the NPL, the
deleted site may be restored to the NPL without application of the
hazard ranking system. EPA proposes to delete this Site because
potentially responsible parties have implemented all appropriate
response actions.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures were used for the intended deletion of
this Site:
(1) The Site was listed on the NPL in September 1983.
(2) In August 1984, EPA entered into an Administrative Order on
Consent with NL Industries for the performance of the Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) for the Site.
(3) The RI Report was completed in 1992, the FS Report in 1994.
(4) On March 31, 1993, EPA signed a Record of Decision (ROD)
selecting an interim remedy for the Site which required the extension
of the municipal water supply system to residents affected or
potentially affected by the Site.
(5) On September 21, 1993, EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative
Order to the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) directing them to
implement the interim remedy.
(6) On January 30, 1996, EPA formally approved the completion of
the extension of the municipal waterline system and connection of the
homes.
(7) On June 6, 1995, EPA issued a ROD which selected a final remedy
for the Site which included engineered and institutional controls.
(8) The first Five-Year Review was signed by EPA on June 30, 2000.
(9) On July 10, 2003, EPA determined that the engineered controls
had been constructed. A final Remedial Action Report was approved on
September 26, 2003.
(10) In June 2005, institutional controls were recorded with the
Genesee County Register of Deeds.
(11) The EPA consulted with the NYSDEC on the deletion of this Site
and NYSDEC concurred with the deletion of
[[Page 57157]]
the Site from the NPL on September 13, 2005.
(12) Concurrently with the publication of this Direct Final
Deletion, a parallel Notice of Intent to Delete has been published
today in the Notice section of the Federal Register. Notices are also
being published in local newspapers and appropriate notice is being
provided to federal, state, and local government officials and other
interested parties.
(13) The EPA placed copies of documents supporting the deletion in
the Site information repositories identified above.
If no significant adverse comments are received, the Site will be
deleted. If significant adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period on this action, EPA will publish a timely notice
of withdrawal of this deletion before its effective date. EPA will
prepare, if appropriate, a response to comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the Notice of Intent to Delete and the
comments already received.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual's rights or obligations. Deletion of a site from
the NPL does not in any way alter EPA's right to take appropriate
enforcement actions.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following summary provides a brief description and actions
taken at the Batavia Landfill Superfund Site which provides the
Agency's rationale for recommending deletion of the Site from the NPL.
The Batavia Landfill Superfund Site (the Site or the Landfill) is
located in the Town of Batavia, Genesee County, approximately three
miles west-northwest of the City of Batavia, New York. The Site is
approximately 35 acres in area and is bounded to the north and portions
of the east by the Galloway Swamp, to the east by the Town's former
Sanitary Landfill (now closed), to the south by Harloff Road (the New
York State Thruway is approximately 200 feet south of the Landfill),
and to the west by vacant property. The Town of Batavia owns the Site
and the adjoining sanitary landfill to the east.
The Landfill accepted wastes, including industrial wastes, for on-
site disposal from 1968 until 1980, when the NYSDEC declared the
property an open dump based on noncompliance with surface water
criteria (40 CFR Part 257). Poor housekeeping practices and the
disposal of industrial and hazardous wastes resulted in the closure of
the Landfill.
During the active years of waste management approximately 800,000
cubic yards of industrial wastes have been disposited at the Site. In
December 1982, Fred C. Hart Associates, under contract with EPA,
conducted a groundwater sampling survey in the area of the Site.
Sampling data from on-site monitoring wells revealed the presence of
hazardous organic and inorganic chemical constituents (including
methylene chloride, 1,1 dichloroethane, and barium) which exceeded New
York State and Federal drinking water standards.
On December 20, 1982, the Site was proposed for inclusion on the
NPL and was added to the NPL by publication in the Federal Register on
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658).
On August 9, 1984, EPA entered into an Administrative Order on
Consent (AOC) with NL Industries, a Potentially Responsible Party
(PRP), for the performance of a RI/FS at the Site.
A residential well program conducted by the New York State
Department of Health in 1992 at homes in close proximity to the Site
revealed levels of contaminants in the wells above the Federal Maximum
Contaminant Levels. A subsequent risk assessment performed by EPA
revealed that the continued ingestion of the groundwater posed a
significant endangerment to the area residents.
On March 31, 1993, EPA signed a Record of Decision (ROD) selecting
an interim remedy for the Site which required the extension of the
municipal water supply system to residents affected or potentially
affected by the Site.
On September 21, 1993, EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order
to the PRPs directing them to implement the interim remedy outlined in
the 1993 ROD. On January 30, 1996, EPA approved the completion of the
replacement and/or retrofitting of residential groundwater well piping
systems with new piping and appurtenances connecting each home to the
waterline.
On June 6, 1995, EPA selected the final remedy: (a) The excavation
of approximately 50,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil from the
northern area of the Landfill and consolidation of these materials
under a landfill cap in the southern area of the Landfill; (b)
excavation of approximately 150 drums from the southern area of the
Landfill and their off-site treatment and disposal; (c) construction of
a cap over the southern region of the Landfill; (d) the restoration of
the surrounding wetlands at the Landfill impacted by past waste
disposal activities; and, (e) establishment of institutional controls
to preclude certain uses of the property.
In September 1995, EPA issued an AOC for the performance of the
remedial design (RD) for the site remedy. The RD was completed in
December 1999. The site remedy was modified on September 16, 1999 in an
Explanation of Significant Difference (ESD) which called for the
excavation and removal of 126,000 cubic yards of contaminated soils
from the northern and central areas of the Site, an increase of 76,000
cubic yards of wastes from the previous estimate.
The final landfill cap, constructed in the southern area of the
Site, covers an approximate area of 15.5 acres and is consistent with
New York State hazardous waste management regulations. Approximately
210,000 cubic yards of excavated wastes from the northern, central and
wetland areas of the Site were consolidated under the southern area
landfill cap. The landfill cap was constructed with 18 inches of
compacted clay, a drainage and leachate collection system, a gas
venting system and a 24-inch barrier protection layer of soil and 6
inches of topsoil suitable to maintain vegetative growth.
A perimeter chain-linked fence around the Site, including three
access gates, has been installed. Approximately seven acres of waste-
impacted wetlands (including some areas of standing water which support
a submergent vegetative community) were remediated and restored during
the conclusion of remedial construction activities in September and
October 2002.
Institutional controls have been put in place at the Site to
restrict future activities at the Site that may negatively impact the
effectiveness of the implemented site remedy or threaten human health
and the environment. These site restrictions include a ban on the
construction of drinking water wells and new building structures that
may impede the effectiveness of the landfill cap systems.
Implementation of the interim and final remedies have utilized
permanent solutions in the effective short-term and long-term abatement
of the human health and ecological risks posed by the Site. The final
remedy is reducing the toxicity, mobility, and volume of contaminants
by reducing infiltration through the landfilled wastes and collecting
and treating the leachate. In addition, the final remedy also involved
the remediation and restoration of seven acres of wetlands at the Site.
EPA has determined that all appropriate response measures under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
[[Page 57158]]
Act have been implemented and that no further cleanup is required. The
Site poses no significant threat to public health or the environment.
Consequently, this Site no longer needs to be listed on the NPL;
however, this decision does not preclude future actions under Superfund
should they become necessary.
A Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP) for the implementation of long-
term operation and maintenance for the landfill cap systems is in
place. The Town of Batavia is required to manage the required operation
and maintenance (O&M) activities in accordance with the RAWP. Required
O&M activities include the long-term implementation of a semi-annual
groundwater monitoring program, periodic Site inspections, and regular
landfill cap maintenance activities. The inspections are required to
ensure and maintain the operational effectiveness and structural
integrity of the Site remedy to protect human health and the
environment.
Institutional controls consisting of an easement and deed
restriction limiting access to the Site and preventing the use of
contaminated water as a drinking source were filed with the Genesee
County Register of Deeds on June 10, 2005.
Public participation activities for this Site have been satisfied
as required by CERCLA Section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and, CERCLA
Section 117,42 U.S.C. 9617. The RI/FS and the 1993 and 1995 RODs were
both subject to the public review process. All documents and
information which EPA relied on or considered in reaching the
conclusion that this Site can be deleted from the NPL are available for
the public to review at the information repositories.
The final remedy implemented at this Site results in contaminants
remaining at the Site above levels that allow for unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure. In accordance with CERCLA Section 121(c), EPA
and/or NYSDEC will conduct a review of this remedy no less often than
every five years. A first Five-Year Review Report for the Site was
completed in June 2000. EPA has determined that the remedies protect
public health and the environment and that they function as intended by
the decision documents. All construction activities for the Site
required by the final ROD were completed in July 2003. A second Five-
Year Review was completed in September 2005.
One of the three criteria for site deletion specifies that a site
may be deleted from the NPL if ``responsible parties or others parties
have implemented all appropriate response actions required.'' [ 40 CFR
300.425(e)(1) (i)]. EPA, with concurrence of the State of New York,
through the NYSDEC, believes that this criterion for deletion has been
met and therefore, EPA is deleting this Site from the NPL.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: September 21, 2005.
Alan J. Steinberg,
Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region II.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble Part 300 Title 40 of Chapter I
of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 300--[AMENDED]
0
The authority citation for Part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O.12580, 52 FR
2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B--[Amended]
0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300 is amended under New York (NY) by
removing the site name ``Batavia Landfill'' and the corresponding city
designation ``Town of Batavia.''
[FR Doc. 05-19613 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P