Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Potomac River, Washington, DC., 57150-57152 [05-19584]
Download as PDF
57150
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
regatta or marine parade permit are
specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under that
section.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g.. specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
I
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol
and then proceed only as directed.
(ii) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Official Patrol.
(iii) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course that minimizes
wake near the swim course.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 6:30 a.m. to 10:30
a.m. on October 1, 2005.
Dated: September 21, 2005.
S. Ratti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth
Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. 05–19585 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary §§ 100.35–T05–
105 to read as follows:
I
§ 100.35–T05–105
Cambridge, MD.
Choptank River,
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
includes all waters of the Choptank
River within 200 yards either side of
a line drawn northwesterly from a point
on the shoreline at latitude 38°33′45″ N,
076°02′38″ W, thence to latitude
38°35′06″ N, 076°04′42″ W, a position
located at Great Marsh Park, Cambridge,
MD. All coordinates reference Datum
NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions.
(1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander
means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
on board and displaying a Coast Guard
ensign.
(3) Participant includes all persons
participating in the Chesapeakeman
Ultra Triathlon swim under the auspices
of the Marine Event Permit issued to the
event sponsor and approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(c) Special local regulations.
(1) Except for event participants and
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area must:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05–05–122]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display,
Potomac River, Washington, DC.
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone on the waters
of the Potomac River. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
and property during a fireworks display
on the Potomac River. The safety zone
will allow for control of designated
areas of the river and safeguard
spectators and participants.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:30
p.m. to 10 p.m. on October 1, 2005.
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket CGD05–05–
122 and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point
Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21226–1791,
between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ronald Houck, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, at (410) 576–2674.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing
an NPRM and delaying its effective date
would be contrary to public interest,
since there is not sufficient time to
publish a proposed rule in advance of
the event and immediate action is
needed to protect persons and vessels
against the hazards associated with a
fireworks display from a barge, such as
premature detonation or falling burning
debris.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. This safety zone of short
duration is needed to provide for the
safety of persons and vessels on the
Potomac River.
Background and Purpose
On October 1, 2005, The Kennedy
Center of Performing Arts in
Washington, DC will sponsor an event
entitled ‘‘Festival of China’’ that will
include a fireworks display launched
from two barges located on the Potomac
River, approximately 1,000 feet
upstream of the Theodore Roosevelt
Memorial Bridge, in Washington, DC. A
fleet of spectator vessels is anticipated
for this event. Due to the need for vessel
control during the fireworks display,
vessel traffic will be restricted to
provide for the safety of spectators and
transiting vessels.
The purpose of this regulation is to
promote maritime safety, and to protect
the environment and mariners transiting
the area from the potential hazards due
to a fireworks display from a barge. This
rule establishes a safety zone on the
waters of the Potomac River in
Washington, DC, approximately 1,000
feet upstream of the Theodore Roosevelt
Memorial Bridge, within a radius of 200
yards around two fireworks barges
which will be located at position
latitude 38°53′ 45.7″ N, longitude
077°03′ 31.6″ W.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone on specified waters of the
Potomac River. The safety zone will be
in effect from 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on
October 1, 2005. This safety zone will
protect spectators and mariners
transiting the area from the potential
hazards associated with a fireworks
display launched from a barge on the
Potomac River. This rule limits access to
the safety zone to those vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Baltimore. Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Baltimore, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the zone. The Captain
of the Port will notify the maritime
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
community via marine broadcasts of the
safety zone.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the Potomac River from 7:30
p.m. to 10 p.m. on October 1, 2005. This
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This rule will be in
effect for two-and-a-half hours,
commercial vessel traffic in this area is
limited, vessels not constrained by their
draft may proceed safely around the
safety zone, and the Coast Guard will
issue maritime advisories to users of the
river before the effective period.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we offered to assist small entities
in understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57151
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
57152
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g.), of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule establishes a
safety zone.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
I
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–122 to
read as follows:
I
§ 165.T05–122 Safety zone; Fireworks
Display, Potomac River, Washington, DC.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the Potomac
River in Washington, DC, surface to
bottom, within a radius of 200 yards
around two fireworks barges which will
be located approximately 1,000 feet
upstream of the Theodore Roosevelt
Memorial Bridge, at position latitude
38°53′45.7″ N, longitude 077°03′31.6″
W. All coordinates reference Datum
NAD.
(b) Definition. The Captain of the Port
Baltimore means the Commander, Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations. The general
regulations governing safety zones,
found in Sec. 165.23, apply to the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(1) All vessels and persons are
prohibited from entering this zone,
except as authorized by the Captain of
the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage within the zone must
request authorization from the Captain
of the Port or his designated
representative by telephone at (410)
576–2693 or by marine band radio on
VHF channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing
this safety zone can be contacted on
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
marine band radio VHF channel 16
(156.8 MHz).
(4) The operator of any vessel within
or in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State and local agencies.
(e) Effective period. This section is
effective from 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on
October 1, 2005.
Dated: September 19, 2005.
Jonathan C. Burton,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. 05–19584 Filed 9–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[FRL–7977–4]
Montana: Final Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Montana has applied to EPA
for Final authorization of changes to its
hazardous waste program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). EPA has determined that
these changes satisfy all requirements
for Final authorization and is
authorizing the State’s changes through
this immediate Final action. EPA is
publishing this rule to authorize the
changes without a prior proposed rule
because we believe this action is not
controversial. Unless we get written
comments opposing this authorization
during the comment period, the
decision to authorize Montana’s changes
to their hazardous waste program will
take effect as provided below. If we
receive comments that oppose this
action, we will publish a document in
the Federal Register withdrawing this
rule before it takes effect. A separate
document in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register will serve as the
proposal to authorize the State’s
changes.
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57150-57152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19584]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05-05-122]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Potomac River, Washington, DC.
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the waters of
the Potomac River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety
of life and property during a fireworks display on the Potomac River.
The safety zone will allow for control of designated areas of the river
and safeguard spectators and participants.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on October 1,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket CGD05-05-122 and are available for
inspection or copying at Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401
Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21226-1791, between 9 a.m. and
3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ronald Houck, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, at (410) 576-2674.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists
[[Page 57151]]
for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM and delaying its
effective date would be contrary to public interest, since there is not
sufficient time to publish a proposed rule in advance of the event and
immediate action is needed to protect persons and vessels against the
hazards associated with a fireworks display from a barge, such as
premature detonation or falling burning debris.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. This safety zone of short duration
is needed to provide for the safety of persons and vessels on the
Potomac River.
Background and Purpose
On October 1, 2005, The Kennedy Center of Performing Arts in
Washington, DC will sponsor an event entitled ``Festival of China''
that will include a fireworks display launched from two barges located
on the Potomac River, approximately 1,000 feet upstream of the Theodore
Roosevelt Memorial Bridge, in Washington, DC. A fleet of spectator
vessels is anticipated for this event. Due to the need for vessel
control during the fireworks display, vessel traffic will be restricted
to provide for the safety of spectators and transiting vessels.
The purpose of this regulation is to promote maritime safety, and
to protect the environment and mariners transiting the area from the
potential hazards due to a fireworks display from a barge. This rule
establishes a safety zone on the waters of the Potomac River in
Washington, DC, approximately 1,000 feet upstream of the Theodore
Roosevelt Memorial Bridge, within a radius of 200 yards around two
fireworks barges which will be located at position latitude 38[deg]53'
45.7'' N, longitude 077[deg]03' 31.6'' W.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on specified waters
of the Potomac River. The safety zone will be in effect from 7:30 p.m.
to 10 p.m. on October 1, 2005. This safety zone will protect spectators
and mariners transiting the area from the potential hazards associated
with a fireworks display launched from a barge on the Potomac River.
This rule limits access to the safety zone to those vessels authorized
by the Captain of the Port Baltimore. Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port Baltimore, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the zone. The Captain of the Port will notify
the maritime community via marine broadcasts of the safety zone.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the Potomac River from 7:30 p.m. to
10 p.m. on October 1, 2005. This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons. This rule will be in effect for two-and-a-half
hours, commercial vessel traffic in this area is limited, vessels not
constrained by their draft may proceed safely around the safety zone,
and the Coast Guard will issue maritime advisories to users of the
river before the effective period.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
[[Page 57152]]
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g.), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule establishes a safety zone.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-122 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-122 Safety zone; Fireworks Display, Potomac River,
Washington, DC.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Potomac River in Washington, DC, surface to bottom, within a radius
of 200 yards around two fireworks barges which will be located
approximately 1,000 feet upstream of the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial
Bridge, at position latitude 38[deg]53[min]45.7[sec] N, longitude
077[deg]03[min]31.6[sec] W. All coordinates reference Datum NAD.
(b) Definition. The Captain of the Port Baltimore means the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations. The general regulations governing safety zones,
found in Sec. 165.23, apply to the safety zone described in paragraph
(a) of this section.
(1) All vessels and persons are prohibited from entering this zone,
except as authorized by the Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage within the
zone must request authorization from the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative by telephone at (410) 576-2693 or by marine
band radio on VHF channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this safety zone can be
contacted on marine band radio VHF channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(4) The operator of any vessel within or in the immediate vicinity
of this safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on board a vessel displaying a
Coast Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on board a vessel displaying a Coast Guard Ensign.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State and local agencies.
(e) Effective period. This section is effective from 7:30 p.m. to
10 p.m. on October 1, 2005.
Dated: September 19, 2005.
Jonathan C. Burton,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Baltimore,
Maryland.
[FR Doc. 05-19584 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P